Thesaurus

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

A thesaurus (pl.: thesauri or thesauruses), sometimes called a synonym dictionary or dictionary of synonyms, is a

antonyms
. They are often used by writers to help find the best word to express an idea:

...to find the word, or words, by which [an] idea may be most fitly and aptly expressed

Synonym dictionaries have a long history. The word 'thesaurus' was used in 1852 by Peter Mark Roget for his Roget's Thesaurus.

While some works called "thesauri", such as Roget's Thesaurus, group words in a

taxonomy of concepts, others are organised alphabetically[4][2]
or in some other way.

Most thesauri do not include definitions, but many dictionaries include listings of synonyms.

Some thesauri and dictionary synonym notes characterise the distinctions between similar words, with notes on their "connotations and varying shades of meaning".

appropriate usage of synonyms.

Writers sometimes use thesauri to avoid repetition of words – elegant variation – which is often criticised by usage manuals: "Writers sometimes use them not just to vary their vocabularies but to dress them up too much".[6]

Etymology

The word "thesaurus" comes from Latin thēsaurus, which in turn comes from Greek θησαυρός (thēsauros) 'treasure, treasury, storehouse'.[7] The word thēsauros is of uncertain etymology.[7][8][9]

Until the 19th century, a thesaurus was any dictionary or encyclopedia,[9] as in the Thesaurus Linguae Latinae (Dictionary of the Latin Language, 1532), and the Thesaurus Linguae Graecae (Dictionary of the Greek Language, 1572). It was Roget who introduced the meaning "collection of words arranged according to sense", in 1852.[7]

History

Peter Mark Roget, author of Roget's thesaurus

In antiquity, Philo of Byblos authored the first text that could now be called a thesaurus. In Sanskrit, the Amarakosha is a thesaurus in verse form, written in the 4th century.

The study of synonyms became an important theme in 18th-century philosophy, and

Condillac wrote, but never published, a dictionary of synonyms.[10][11]

Some early synonym dictionaries include:

Roget's Thesaurus, first compiled in 1805 by Peter Mark Roget, and published in 1852, follows John Wilkins' semantic arrangement of 1668. Unlike earlier synonym dictionaries, it does not include definitions or aim to help the user choose among synonyms. It has been continuously in print since 1852 and remains widely used across the English-speaking world.[20] Roget described his thesaurus in the foreword to the first edition:[21]

It is now nearly fifty years since I first projected a system of verbal classification similar to that on which the present work is founded. Conceiving that such a compilation might help to supply my deficiencies, I had, in the year 1805, completed a classed catalogue of words on a small scale, but on the same principle, and nearly in the same form, as the Thesaurus now published.

Organization

Conceptual

Roget's original thesaurus was organized into 1000 conceptual Heads (e.g., 806 Debt) organized into a four-level

taxonomy. For example, debt is classed under V.ii.iv:[22]

Class five, Volition: the exercise of the will
Division Two: Social volition
Section 4: Possessive Relations
Subsection 4: Monetary relations.

Each head includes direct synonyms: Debt, obligation, liability, ...; related concepts: interest, usance, usury; related persons: debtor, debitor, ... defaulter (808); verbs: to be in debt, to owe, ... see Borrow (788); phrases: to run up a bill or score, ...; and adjectives: in debt, indebted, owing, .... Numbers in parentheses are cross-references to other Heads.

The book starts with a Tabular Synopsis of Categories laying out the hierarchy,[23] then the main body of the thesaurus listed by the Head, and then an alphabetical index listing the different Heads under which a word may be found: Liable, subject to, 177; debt, 806; duty, 926.[24]

Some recent versions have kept the same organization, though often with more detail under each Head.[25] Others have made modest changes such as eliminating the four-level taxonomy and adding new heads: one has 1075 Heads in fifteen Classes.[26]

Some non-English thesauri have also adopted this model.[27]

In addition to its taxonomic organization, the Historical Thesaurus of English (2009) includes the date when each word came to have a given meaning. It has the novel and unique goal of "charting the semantic development of the huge and varied vocabulary of English".

Different senses of a word are listed separately. For example, three different senses of "debt" are listed in three different places in the taxonomy:[28]
A sum of money that is owed or due; a liability or obligation to pay

Society
Trade and Finance
Management of Money
Insolvency
Indebtedness [noun]


An immaterial debt; is an obligation to do something

Society
Morality
Duty or obligation
[noun]


An offence requiring expiation (figurative, Biblical)

Society
Faith
Aspects of faith
Spirituality
Sin
[noun]
instance of

Alphabetical

Other thesauri and synonym dictionaries are organized alphabetically.

Most repeat the list of synonyms under each word.[29][30][31][32]

Some designate a principal entry for each concept and cross-reference it.[33][34][35]

A third system interfiles words and conceptual headings. Francis March's Thesaurus Dictionary gives for liability: CONTINGENCY, CREDIT–DEBT, DUTY–DERELICTION, LIBERTY–SUBJECTION, MONEY, each of which is a conceptual heading.[36] The CREDIT—DEBT article has multiple subheadings, including Nouns of Agent, Verbs, Verbal Expressions, etc. Under each are listed synonyms with brief definitions, e.g. "Credit. Transference of property on promise of future payment." The conceptual headings are not organized into a taxonomy.

Benjamin Lafaye's Synonymes français (1841) is organized around morphologically related families of synonyms (e.g. logis, logement),[37] and his Dictionnaire des synonymes de la langue française (1858) is mostly alphabetical, but also includes a section on morphologically related synonyms, which is organized by prefix, suffix, or construction.[11]

Contrasting senses

Before Roget, most thesauri and dictionary synonym notes included discussions of the differences among near-synonyms, as do some modern ones.[32][31][30][5]

Merriam-Webster's Dictionary of Synonyms is a stand-alone modern English synonym dictionary that does discuss differences.[33] In addition, many general English dictionaries include synonym notes.

Several modern synonym dictionaries in French are primarily devoted to discussing the precise demarcations among synonyms.[38][11]

Additional elements

Some include short definitions.[36]

Some give illustrative phrases.[32]

Some include lists of objects within the category (

hyponyms), e.g. breeds of dogs.[32]

Bilingual

Bilingual synonym dictionaries are designed for language learners. One such dictionary gives various French words listed alphabetically, with an English translation and an example of use.[39] Another one is organized taxonomically with examples, translations, and some usage notes.[40]

Information science and natural language processing

In

library and information science, a thesaurus is a kind of controlled vocabulary
.

A thesaurus can form part of an

ontology and be represented in the Simple Knowledge Organization System (SKOS).[41]

Thesauri are used in natural language processing for word-sense disambiguation[42] and text simplification for machine translation systems.[43]

See also

Bibliography

References

  1. ^ "thesaurus, n.", OED Online, Oxford University Press, retrieved 2023-01-21
  2. ^
    OCLC 321014234.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: others (link
    )
  3. ^ Roget, Peter. 1852. Thesaurus of English Language Words and Phrases.
  4. OCLC 57506786
    .
  5. ^ , p. xxvii
  6. Edwin L. Battistella, "Beware the thesaurus", OUPblog, "Oxford University Press's Academic Insights for the Thinking World", February 11, 2018
  7. ^ a b c "thesaurus". Online Etymology Dictionary.
  8. ^ R. S. P. Beekes, Etymological Dictionary of Greek, Brill, 2009, p. 548.
  9. ^ a b Oxford English Dictionary s.v.
  10. ^ Embleton
  11. ^ a b c B. Lafaye, Dictionnaire des synonymes de la langue française, Hachette 1869, 3rd edition
  12. ^ John Wilkins, An Essay Towards a Real Character, and a Philosophical Language, London 1668 full text
  13. ^ John Wilkins, William Lloyd (anonymously), An Alphabetical Dictionary Wherein all English Words According to their Various Significations, Are either referred to their Places in the Philosophical Tables, Or explained by such Words as are in those Tables, London 1668 full text
  14. , p. 39-52
  15. ^ Gabriel Girard, La Justesse de la langue françoise, ou les différentes significations des mots qui passent pour synonymes, Paris 1718, full text
  16. ^ John Trusler (anonymously), The Difference between Words esteemed Synonyms, in the English Language; and the proper choice of them determined, London, 1766 full text
  17. ^ Hester Lynch Piozzi, British Synonymy; or, an Attempt Regulating the Choice of Words in Familiar Conversation, Dublin 1794 full text
  18. ^ James Leslie, Dictionary of the Synonymous Words and Technical Terms in the English Language, Edinburgh, 1806 full text
  19. ^ George Crabb, English Synonyms Explained, in Alphabetical Order with Copious Illustrations and Examples Drawn from the Best Writers, 2nd edition, London 1818 full text
  20. . Retrieved 26 March 2018.
  21. ^ Roget, P. M. (1982). "Prefact to the first edition, 1852". In Lloyd, Susan M. (ed.). Roget's Thesaurus of English Words and Phrases (New ed.). Harlow: Longman. p. xix.
  22. ^ Peter Mark Roget, Thesaurus of English words and phrases, classified so as to facilitate the expression of ideas, 1853, V.ii.iv, p. 204
  23. ^ Roget, op.cit. p. xxvi
  24. ^ Roget, op.cit. p. 349
  25. , p. 454
  26. , p. ix
  27. ^
  28. ^
  29. ^
  30. ^ uses an asterisk
  31. ^ a b Francis Andrew March, Francis A. March, Jr., March's Thesaurus and Dictionary of the English Language (issued under the editorial supervision of Norman Cousins), Doubleday, 1968, p. 598 full text, 1906 edition
  32. ^ Pierre Benjamin Lafaye, Synonymes français, Paris 1841 full text
  33. (1982 edition)
  34. ^ Miles, Alistair; Bechhofer, Sean (2009). "SKOS simple knowledge organization system reference". W3C Recommendation. 18: W3C.
  35. ^ Yarowsky, David. "Word-sense disambiguation using statistical models of Roget's categories trained on large corpora." Proceedings of the 14th conference on Computational linguistics-Volume 2. Association for Computational Linguistics, 1992.
  36. ^ Siddharthan, Advaith. "An architecture for a text simplification system." Language Engineering Conference, 2002. Proceedings. IEEE, 2002.

External links