Third Council of Constantinople

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Third Council of Constantinople
Miniature 45 from the Constantine Manasses Chronicle, 14 century: Sixth Ecumenical Council
Date680–681
Accepted by
Previous council
Second Council of Constantinople
Next council
Convoked byEmperor
Jesus Christ as having two energies and two wills (divine and human).[2]

Background

Main article: Monothelitism

The council settled a set of theological controversies that went back to the sixth century but had intensified under the emperors

attempted to silence discussion by outlawing speaking either in favor or against the doctrine.[3] Pope Martin I and the monk Maximus, the foremost opponents of monothelitism (which they interpreted as denying a human faculty of will to Christ), held a synod in Rome in 649 that condemned monoenergism and monothelitism.[4] At Constantinople in around 653, some accused the Pope of supporting revolution; this was regarded as high treason, and Martin was accordingly arrested, tried, condemned and sent into exile, where he soon died. Martin and Maximus's position was supported by others at the Council of Constantinople.[5][page needed][6]

Preparations

After Constans' son and successor, Constantine IV had overcome the Muslim siege of Constantinople in 678, he immediately set his sights on restoring communion with Rome: he wrote to Pope Donus suggesting a conference on the matter. When the letter reached Rome, Donus had died. Still, his successor, Pope Agatho, agreed to the Emperor's suggestion and ordered councils held throughout the West so that legates could present the tradition of the Western Church. There was a synod in Milan under Archbishop Mausuetus; another synod was held in 680 at Hatfield, over which Theodore, Archbishop of Canterbury presided. Pope Agatho then convened a synod at Rome at Easter 680, with representatives from the regional synods.[citation needed]

Then he sent a delegation to meet the Easterners at Constantinople.[7] The delegates set out bearing two letters, one from Pope Agatho to the Emperor and the other from the bishops of the Rome synod to those gathered in Constantinople.[8]

In the meantime, Constantine summoned

Patriarch George I of Constantinople and all bishops of his jurisdiction of Constantinople to a council. He also summoned Patriarch Macarius of Antioch, a Byzantine appointee permanently resident in Constantinople because of the Muslim occupation of his see.[citation needed
]

Proceedings

On 7 November 680, a mere 37 bishops and several presbyters convened in the imperial palace, the domed hall called the Trullus. The patriarchs of Constantinople and Antioch participated in person. In contrast, the patriarchates of Alexandria and

Muslim conquest, there was, at this date, no patriarch in either of these sees). The Pope and a council he had held in Rome were represented (as was customary at eastern ecumenical councils) by a few priests and bishops. In its opening session, the council assumed the authority of an ecumenical council. The emperor attended and presided over the first eleven sessions, participated in the discussions, and returned for the closing session on 16 September 681, attended by 151 bishops.[2]

During the council, a letter by Pope Agatho was read, which asserted the traditional belief of the Church that Christ was of two wills, divine and human. Most of the bishops present accepted the letter, proclaiming that

Jesus Christ possessed two energies and two wills but that the human will was 'in subjection to his divine and all-powerful will'. The council carefully avoided any mention of Maximus the Confessor, who was still regarded with suspicion. It condemned both monoenergism and monothelitism as heretical and included those who had supported this heresy, including Pope Honorius I and four previous patriarchs of Constantinople.[2] When the council had concluded, the decrees were sent to Rome where they were accepted by Agatho's successor, Pope Leo II.[7] In his letter of confirmation of the council, Leo accuses, "Honorius who did not attempt to sanctify this Apostolic Church with the teaching of Apostolic tradition, but by profane treachery permitted its purity to be polluted".[9]

At some point during the council's proceedings, a Monothelite priest claimed he could raise the dead, thereby proving his faith supreme. He had a corpse brought forth, but after whispering prayers into its ears, he could not revive the body.[10]

See also

References

  1. ^ Continuity and Change in Creed and Confessions, Credo: Historical and Theological Guide to Creeds and Confessions of Faith, ed. Jaroslav Pelikan (Yale University Press, 2013), 15.
  2. ^ a b c George Ostrogorsky, History of the Byzantine State (Rutgers University Press, 1995), 127.
  3. ^ The Acts of the Council of Chalcedon, Volume 1, transl. Richard Price and Michael Gaddis (Liverpool University Press, 2005), 55.
  4. ISBN 0-87840-399-X
    .
  5. ISBN 978-0-7391-1977-8.[page needed
    ]
  6. ^ Siecienski 2010, p. 74.
  7. ^ a b c Joseph Brusher, S.J., Popes Through the Ages Archived 6 February 2006 at the Wayback Machine.
  8. ^ Hefele, Karl Joseph von. A History of the Councils of the Church, T. & T. Clark, 1896, §313
  9. ^ Chapman, John. "The Condemnation of Pope Honorius". London : Catholic Truth Society, 1907. p. 114.
  10. ^ Kelly, Joseph F. "Chapter Three: The Byzantine Councils." The Ecumenical Councils of the Catholic Church: A History. Collegeville, MN: Liturgical, 2009. p. 59. [ISBN 0814653766]

Bibliography

External links
Early Middle AgesHigh Middle AgesLate Middle Ages19th century20th century21st century
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Third_Council_of_Constantinople&oldid=1186663222"