Third Silesian War
Third Silesian War | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Part of the Seven Years' War and the Silesian Wars | |||||||
Prussian grenadiers advancing at the Battle of Leuthen, as depicted by Carl Röchling | |||||||
| |||||||
Belligerents | |||||||
Prussia |
Habsburg monarchy Saxony Russia (until 1762) France (until 1758) | ||||||
Commanders and leaders | |||||||
Casualties and losses | |||||||
180,000 dead | Over 145,000 dead or missing |
The Third Silesian War (German: Dritter Schlesischer Krieg) was a war between
This conflict can be viewed as a continuation of the First and Second Silesian Wars of the previous decade. After the Treaty of Aix-la-Chapelle ended the War of the Austrian Succession, Austria enacted broad reforms and upended its traditional diplomatic policy to prepare for renewed war with Prussia. As with the previous Silesian Wars, no particular triggering event initiated the conflict; rather, Prussia struck opportunistically to disrupt its enemies' plans. The war's cost in blood and treasure was high on both sides, and it ended inconclusively when neither of the main belligerents could sustain the conflict any longer.
The war began with a Prussian invasion of
Context and causes
While the Seven Years' War was a global conflict among many belligerents, its Central European theatre turned on lingering grudges from the War of the Austrian Succession (1741–1748). The Treaty of Aix-la-Chapelle, which had concluded the latter war, confirmed Prussian King Frederick II's seizure of the region of Silesia from the Habsburg monarchy through two Silesian Wars.[1] The defeated Empress Maria Theresa of Austria nevertheless fully intended to retake the lost province and reassert Austria's hegemony in the Holy Roman Empire; after peace was restored, she set about rebuilding her armed forces and seeking out new alliances.[2]
Unresolved conflicts
Though
In 1746 Maria Theresa formed a defensive agreement with Elizabeth known as the
Diplomatic Revolution
Britain elevated tensions in 1755 by offering to
Austria was now seeking warmer relations with France to ensure that the French would not take Prussia's side in a future conflict over Silesia. King
Preparations for war
As Austria and Russia made open preparations for renewed war, Frederick became convinced that Prussia would be attacked in early 1757. Rather than wait for his enemies to move at a time of their choosing, he resolved instead to act preemptively, beginning with an attack against the neighbouring
To begin, Frederick divided Prussia's armies in three. He placed a force of 20,000 under
Methods and technologies
European warfare in the
The Silesian Wars, like most European wars of the 18th century, were fought as so-called
Course
1756
Invasion of Saxony
Prussian troops crossed the Saxon frontier on 29 August 1756.
Frederick and the main Prussian army pressed on into northern Bohemia, looking to engage the Austrians under General
1757
Winter diplomacy
Over the winter of 1756–1757 the belligerents worked to secure their respective alliances and coordinate strategy with their allies. In February William Pitt, the new Leader of the House of Commons and a determined foe of France, persuaded the British Parliament to firmly and finally commit to the Prussian cause against Austria and France, after which Britain began delivering supplies and badly needed subsidies to Berlin. Parliament also approved the deployment of an army of observation to defend Hanover (and Brandenburg) against the coming French invasion from the west,[25] and Frederick again called for a British naval deployment in the Baltic to deter Russia and an increasingly unfriendly Sweden, though nothing came of it.[26]
However, Prussia's aggressive attack on Saxony galvanised the Austrian coalition, and in particular increased France's commitment to offensive war against Prussia. The
In return, Austria promised that after the victory was won it would grant France control of the Austrian Netherlands, a long-coveted prize for the French. Russia also committed 80,000 men to the conflict, hoping to seize East Prussia and then exchange that territory with Poland for control of Courland. Sweden also agreed to invade Prussian Pomerania, looking to recovering the territories lost to Prussia after the Great Northern War. In all, then, the Austrian coalition sought a total partition of the Kingdom of Prussia,[28] all while portraying Frederick as the aggressor for making the first move to open war.[29]
Bohemian campaign and Battle of Kolín
After wintering in Saxony, Frederick decided to immediately invade Bohemia again, before French or Russian forces could reach the area and support the Austrians.[30] On 18 April 1757 the main Prussian army advanced in multiple columns through the Ore Mountains, seeking a decisive engagement with Browne's forces,[31] while the Silesian garrison under Schwerin advanced from Glatz to join them.[30] On 21 April Bevern's column encountered an Austrian corps led by Count Königsegg near Reichenberg; the ensuing Battle of Reichenberg ended in a Prussian victory, and the Prussian forces continued to advance on Prague.[32]
The invading columns reunited north of Prague, while the retreating Austrians reformed under the command of
Trying to simultaneously besiege Prague and face Daun, the Prussians were compelled to divide their forces. Frederick led 5,000 troops from the siege to reinforce a 19,000-man army under Bevern at nearby Kolín and assess the situation.[36] Without sufficient force to resist Daun's advance, Frederick decided to withdraw more men from the siege and preemptively attack the Austrian position. The resulting Battle of Kolín on 18 June ended in a decisive Austrian victory; the Prussian position was ruined, and the invaders were forced to lift the siege and withdraw from Bohemia altogether, pursued by Daun's army, which was enlarged by the Prague garrison. The failure to take Bohemia meant the ruin of Frederick's strategy, leaving no prospect of a march on Vienna.[33]
East Prussia and Pomerania
Prussia's reversal in Bohemia paralleled the entry of new belligerents on the Austrian side. In mid-1757 a Russian force of 75,000 troops under Field Marshal Stepan Fyodorovich Apraksin invaded East Prussia and took the fortress at Memel.[37] Advancing further, the Russians engaged and defeated a smaller Prussian force led by Lehwaldt in the Battle of Gross-Jägersdorf on 30 August. However, the victorious Russians were unable to take Königsberg, having expended their supplies at Memel and Gross-Jägersdorf, and retreated soon afterwards; recurring difficulties with logistics limited the offensive capabilities of the large Russian army and allowed East Prussia to hold out longer than might have been expected.[38] Sweden, too, declared war on Prussia in September, invading Prussian Pomerania on 13 September with 17,000 men and beginning the Pomeranian War.[37] The need to defend core territories on these fronts reduced Prussia's offensive capacity in Bohemia and Silesia.[39]
Battle of Rossbach
In mid-1757 Austrian forces gradually pushed into Prussian-controlled Lusatia, while a combined French and Reichsarmee force under the
Deterred by the overwhelming Austrian force in Lusatia, Frederick instead led a Prussian army westward into Thuringia to seek a decisive engagement with the approaching Franco-Imperial army before it could unite with Prince Charles and Daun. The Imperials evaded the Prussians, however, and on 10 September Hanover and the British army of observation surrendered to France with the Convention of Klosterzeven, further exposing Prussia's western flank.[43] Meanwhile, between 10 and 17 October a small hussar force under Hungarian Count András Hadik ranged ahead of the main Austrian force to briefly occupy Berlin, ransoming the city for 200,000 thalers and then retreating.[44] In late October the Prussian army reversed course and moved back eastward to Leipzig to defend Prussia's core territory against the various threats it now faced.[43]
After this series of manoeuvres, on 5 November a Prussian corps under Frederick located and engaged Soubise's much larger force near the village of
Battle of Leuthen
While Frederick's army manoeuvred in western Saxony and Thuringia, the Austrian army of Prince Charles and Daun pressed eastward into Lower Silesia. In November they reached
When Frederick learned of the fall of Breslau, his 22,000 men marched 274 kilometres (170 mi) in twelve days to regroup with the retreating Prussian troops from Breslau at
Winter manoeuvres
After this major defeat, Prince Charles was removed from his command and replaced by Daun, who was now promoted to Field Marshal. Frederick hoped the major victories at Rossbach and Leuthen would bring Maria Theresa to the peace table,
1758
Moravian campaign
In January 1758 a Russian army commanded by Count
At length, on 11 April the British formalised their alliance with Prussia in the Anglo-Prussian Convention, in which they committed to provide Prussia with a subsidy of £670,000 annually (equivalent to £101 million in 2023) and to make no separate peace, as well as deploying 9,000 troops to reinforce Prince Ferdinand's army in the Rhineland.[59] Frederick decided that the time had come to invade Moravia and seize the fortified city of Olmütz, as he had planned the previous year, as soon as the last Austrians could be driven from Silesia. Schweidnitz, the last Austrian-occupied stronghold in Silesia, surrendered on 16 April, after which Frederick led a field army into Moravia, reaching Olmütz on 29 April and besieging it on 20 May.[60][61]
Olmütz was well defended, and the siege was slow and difficult.[62] Frederick hoped to provoke an Austrian counter-attack, but Daun chose to avoid direct engagements with the Prussian force, focusing instead on harassing its supply lines. By late June the city's defences were badly damaged, but the besieging army's supplies were acutely low. On 30 June Austrian forces commanded by General Ernst von Laudon intercepted a massive supply convoy from Silesia bound for the Prussian army at Olmütz and destroyed it in the Battle of Domstadtl. After this loss, the Prussians were forced to break off the siege and withdraw from Moravia, abandoning their final major invasion of Austrian territory during the war.[63]
Battles of Zorndorf and Hochkirch
Frustrated in Moravia, the Prussians fortified Saxony and Silesia, while Frederick led an army northward to repel the advancing Russians, who had by then reached the borders of Brandenburg, where they besieged and burned Küstrin. The Prussian troops who had besieged Stralsund through the winter now withdrew to bolster Frederick's force, joining them near the ruins of Küstrin on 22 August.[64] On 25 August a Prussian army of 35,000 men under Frederick engaged a Russian army of 43,000 under Fermor just east of the Oder in Neumark at the Battle of Zorndorf.[65] Both sides fought to exhaustion and suffered heavy casualties, but the Russians withdrew, and Frederick claimed victory.[66]
The Prussians regrouped and marched back to Saxony, where they manoeuvred against Daun's advancing Austrians through September and into October, probing the Austrians' communications but avoiding any decisive engagement.[67] On 14 October Daun surprised the main Prussian army led by Frederick and Keith near Hochkirch in Lusatia, overwhelming them in the Battle of Hochkirch.[68] The Prussians abandoned much of their artillery and supplies, and Keith was killed in action, but the survivors retreated in good order, and Daun declined to pursue them.[69] The Prussians hastily regrouped and entered Silesia to break an Austrian siege of Neisse on 7 November. After this they returned westward to reinforce Dresden in case of an attack by Daun, but the Austrians withdrew to the west without further attacks.[70]
Winter quarters
After taking heavy losses at Zorndorf, Fermor's Russian army pulled back to the Baltic coast and across the Vistula, making no further attacks against Prussia in 1758.[71] The withdrawal of Prussian soldiers from Swedish Pomerania led to a renewed Swedish offensive in September, which progressed as far as Neuruppin; but, after failing to unite with either Russian or Austrian forces, the Swedes fell back to Swedish Pomerania for the winter for supplies.[72] Despite their victory at Hochkirch, Daun's Austrians, too, ultimately made little strategic progress in Saxony and were unable to retake Dresden. Eventually, the Austrians were forced to withdraw into Bohemia for the winter, leaving Saxony under Prussian control,[69] while the decimated Prussian army worked to rebuild itself in Saxony and Silesia.[73]
1759
Battle of Kunersdorf
In April 1759 Frederick led his main army from Saxony into Lower Silesia to keep the Russian army in western Poland separated from Daun's Austrians in Bohemia. Meanwhile, a smaller Prussian force under Frederick's younger brother,
On 3 August Saltykov reached and occupied
Heavy Russian casualties at Kunersdorf and disagreement between the Russian and Austrian leadership led the cautious Count Saltykov to hold back his forces, giving the Prussians time to regroup.[78] The Russian army's tenuous supply lines through Poland made it difficult to press home the victory so deep in enemy territory,[74] and Prince Henry's manoeuvres in Saxony threatened to cut the Austrians' supply lines, upon which the Russians also partially depended. In September, despite the coalition's overwhelming superiority of force in Brandenburg, both the Russians and Austrians withdrew into Silesia. The coalition's internal conflicts and hesitant leadership had given Prussia a second chance, an event that Frederick later termed the "Miracle of the House of Brandenburg".[79]
Saxon campaign
In early September Austrian forces in Bohemia pressed into Saxony, which had been largely emptied of defenders in preparation for Kunersdorf, forcing the surrender of Dresden on 4 September and quickly occupying most of the electorate.[80] Prince Henry's force marched west to contest Saxony again, where a contingent under General Friedrich August von Finck sharply defeated a larger Austrian force at the Battle of Korbitz on 21 September.[81] In response, Daun sent a relief force of his own into Saxony, only to have it destroyed by Prince Henry's Prussians on 25 September at the Battle of Hoyerswerda. Chagrined at the prospect of losing Saxony again, Daun then moved his own main force westward into Saxony,[82] leaving behind the Russians, who withdrew into Poland for the winter.[78]
In November, while the Prussian army worked to rebuild itself in Brandenburg and Silesia, a Prussian corps under Finck positioned itself at
1760
Lower Silesian campaign
In early 1760 Laudon was given his own command in Silesia, independent of Daun,[85] and began campaigning there in March. After an inconclusive engagement with the Prussian garrison near Neustadt on 15 March,[86] Laudon's Austrians gradually advanced through Lower Silesia, besieging Glatz on 7 June. De la Motte Fouqué led a force to relieve the fortress, but Laudon engaged and destroyed them on 23 June at the Battle of Landeshut, taking de la Motte Fouqué prisoner. The principal Prussian force under Frederick started eastward to defend Silesia, but it reversed course upon learning that Daun's main army was moving in the same direction.[87] Temporarily abandoning Silesia to Austrian siege, Frederick led his army back into Saxony and besieged Dresden from 13 July.[88] The Prussians hoped either to take Dresden quickly or at least to divide the Austrians' attention; instead, Daun's army marched westward and forced the Prussians to lift the siege and withdraw on 21 July.[87]
Glatz was taken by the Austrians on 29 July, followed shortly by Liegnitz and
Battle of Torgau
A secondary Prussian force under General
The main Prussian and Austrian armies under Frederick, Daun and Lacy finally faced each other on 3 November near Torgau, where the succeeding Battle of Torgau proved very costly for both sides. In the end the Prussians controlled the field and claimed victory, but both armies were badly weakened and soon retreated to winter quarters. Prussia's pyrrhic victory at Torgau resulted in few strategic gains, since Daun still controlled Dresden, and Laudon's army still had the run of Silesia;[94] the Prussian currency had to again be devalued over the winter to stabilise the army's finances.[95] On the other hand, the Austrians, who had hoped to decide the war once and for all at Torgau, were bitterly disappointed to have suffered still another defeat at the hands of a smaller Prussian force, and Maria Theresa's deteriorating finances were beginning to constrain the Austrian war effort. The battle left the war-making capacity of both sides so depleted that neither retained any realistic prospect of bringing the Silesian War to a decisive close without outside help.[94]
1761
Dwindling resources
By early 1761 neither side retained the men or supplies needed to mount a major offensive. Prussia could field only 104,000 troops, many of them raw recruits, and there were shortages of even basic supplies like muskets for the infantry. The Prussian army was no longer fit for the sort of aggressive manoeuvers that had previously characterised Frederick's tactics,[96] and the kingdom's situation was desperate.[97] Daun, the chief Austrian commander, also ruled out major offensives for the year and made no plans to even attempt to reconquer Silesia, preferring to concentrate his efforts in Saxony against Prince Henry. Austria's finances were in a state of chaos, and its economy was choked by heavy war taxes. Cooperation between Russian and Austrian forces was breaking down, as the two allied powers grew less willing to pursue each other's goals in the field.[98]
Russian advances
Russian Marshal Alexander Buturlin, the new commander of Russia's forces in the theatre, coordinated with Laudon's Austrians to begin an advance in southern Silesia in April.[99] The Prussian garrison under General Karl Christoph von der Goltz dug in around Schweidnitz, while field armies under Frederick, Laudon and Buturlin engaged in a prolonged campaign of manoeuver with no major engagements. The allies ended the campaign with a modest victory by storming the fortress at Schweidnitz on 1 October, after which the Prussians fell back to winter quarters in northern Silesia and Brandenburg.[100]
Meanwhile, Russian forces under
1762
The "second miracle"
As 1762 began, the Prussian armies had dwindled to only sixty thousand men, and it was doubtful whether they could prevent a renewed Russian and Austrian advance to Berlin. A total Prussian collapse seemed imminent; the British now threatened to withdraw their subsidies if Prussia did not offer concessions to secure peace, a threat made good later that year by the new British prime minister, Lord Bute.[103] Then, on 5 January 1762, the ailing Russian Empress Elizabeth died. Her nephew and successor, Emperor Peter III, was an ardent admirer of Frederick's, and he at once reversed Elizabeth's foreign policy and ordered a ceasefire with Prussia.[104]
Peter agreed to an
Meanwhile, French morale had been sapped by prolonged British blockades, defeats in
Final campaigns
With its flanks now secured, Prussia concentrated all of its remaining strength against Austria. The Prussian army, swollen by forces recalled from the north and soon to be augmented by Chernyshev's Russians, could once again match the Austrians' strength in the field, and in June the Prussians marched again to contest Silesia.[109] However, on 9 July Peter was deposed and replaced by his wife, Empress Catherine II (later to be known as Catherine the Great); Catherine immediately withdrew from the alliance her husband had formed with Prussia, but she did not rejoin the war on the Austrian side.[104]
Despite the loss of their Russian auxiliaries, the Prussians engaged Daun's army on 21 July near
In the following months Prince Henry led a secondary army into Saxony, where he engaged the Austrian defenders of Dresden near Freiberg on 29 October; the Battle of Freiberg saw the defenders shattered and pursued back to Dresden, after which Prussian forces occupied the majority of Saxony.[112] Prince Henry's army pursued some Reichsarmee forces into Franconia and raided pro-Austrian principalities in the Holy Roman Empire in November and December.[113] In November Maria Theresa proposed to open peace negotiations, to which Frederick immediately agreed; on 24 November the two belligerents declared an armistice in Saxony and Silesia,[112] and formal peace talks began in late December.[114]
Stalemate
By the end of 1762 Prussia had recovered nearly all of Silesia from the Austrians, and after the Battle of Freiberg it controlled most of Saxony outside of Dresden; Austria still held Dresden and the southeastern edge of Saxony, along with the County of Glatz to the south of Silesia. The warring powers in Central Europe had essentially fought to a stalemate. Prussia's finances were stable, but the country had been devastated by battle and enemy occupation, and its manpower was spent.[115] Austria was facing a severe financial crisis and had to reduce the size of its army, greatly decreasing its offensive power; without Russian troops or French subsidies, it had little hope of reconquering Silesia.[116] The other belligerents in the wider Seven Years' War had already begun peace talks; now, negotiators from Austria, Prussia and Saxony convened on 30 December at Hubertusburg palace, near the front lines in Saxony, to discuss terms of peace.[113][117]
1763
Treaty of Hubertusburg
Frederick had earlier considered offering East Prussia to Russia in return for Peter's support for his seizure of Saxony, but Catherine's withdrawal meant that Russia was no longer a belligerent and did not participate in the negotiations. The warring parties eventually agreed to simply restore their respective conquests to each other: Austria would withdraw from Glatz, restoring full Prussian control of Silesia, in exchange for Prussia's evacuation of Saxony, which would be returned to Frederick Augustus, who would receive no other reparations from Prussia. With these swaps, the borders in the region arrived precisely back at the
Outcomes
The return to territorial status quo ante meant that none of the belligerents in the Silesian War gained the prize it had aimed at: Prussia failed to keep any part of Saxony, while Austria was unable to recover its lost province of Silesia, nor did Russia gain any territory at Prussia's expense. Nonetheless, the outcome of the war has generally been considered a diplomatic victory for Prussia,
Prussia
Prussia emerged from the war as a new European
Though sometimes depicted as a key moment in Prussia's rise to greatness, the war nonetheless left the kingdom's economy and population devastated, and much of the remainder of Frederick's reign was spent repairing the damage. To mitigate population losses, the King continued his
Prussia's armed forces had experienced heavy casualties in the war, with around 180,000 men killed,
Austria
The war left the Habsburg monarchy deeply in debt,[128] and its armed forces were greatly weakened, with more than 145,000 men dead or missing in the conflict.[124] Austria was not able to retake Silesia or realise any other territorial gains, but it did preserve Saxony from Prussian control, slowing the growth of its new northern rival. Its military performed far more respectably than during the War of the Austrian Succession, which seemed to vindicate Maria Theresa's administrative and military reforms since that war. Thus, the war in great part restored Austria's prestige and preserved its position as a major player in the European system.[129] By agreeing to vote for Archduke Joseph in the Imperial election, Frederick accepted the continuation of Habsburg pre-eminence in the Holy Roman Empire, though this was far less than Austria had hoped to win in the war.[130]
Prussia's confirmation as a first-rate power and the enhanced prestige of its king and army were long-term threats to Austria's hegemony in Germany.
References
- ^ a b c Fraser (2000), p. 202.
- ^ Wilson (2016), pp. 478–479.
- ^ a b Shennan (2005), p. 49.
- ^ Clark (2006), pp. 197–198.
- ^ Fraser (2000), pp. 297–301.
- ^ Horn (1957), pp. 449–464.
- ^ Black (1990), pp. 301–323.
- ^ Fraser (2000), pp. 293–294.
- ^ Fraser (2000), p. 310.
- ^ a b Asprey (1986), p. 427.
- ^ Fraser (2000), p. 308.
- ^ Fraser (2000), pp. 317–318.
- ^ a b Black (1994), pp. 38–52.
- ^ Black (1994), pp. 67–80.
- ^ Clark (2006), p. 209.
- ^ Creveld (1977), pp. 26–28.
- ^ Clark (2006), pp. 198–199.
- ^ Fraser (2000), p. 317.
- ^ Asprey (1986), p. 428.
- ^ Fraser (2000), pp. 318–319.
- ^ Asprey (1986), pp. 430–438.
- ^ Fraser (2000), p. 324.
- ^ Fraser (2000), pp. 324–326.
- ^ Asprey (1986), p. 465.
- ^ Fraser (2000), pp. 334–336.
- ^ Fraser (2000), p. 333.
- ^ Fraser (2000), pp. 331–332.
- ^ a b c Clark (2006), pp. 199–200.
- ^ Fraser (2000), pp. 311–312.
- ^ a b Fraser (2000), p. 337.
- ^ Marston (2001), p. 37.
- ^ Fraser (2000), p. 340.
- ^ a b Luvaas (2009), p. 6.
- ^ Marston (2001), p. 39.
- ^ Fraser (2000), pp. 348–349.
- ^ Asprey (1986), p. 454.
- ^ a b Asprey (1986), p. 460.
- ^ Marston (2001), p. 22.
- ^ Anderson (2000), p. 176.
- ^ a b c d Marston (2001), p. 41.
- ^ Anderson (2000), p. 302.
- ^ Fraser (2000), p. 359.
- ^ a b Fraser (2000), pp. 359–362.
- ^ Asprey (1986), p. 467.
- ^ Asprey (1986), pp. 469–472.
- ^ Fraser (2000), p. 369.
- ^ Kohlrausch (1844), p. 573.
- ^ Fraser (2000), pp. 370–373.
- ^ Asprey (1986), pp. 476–481.
- ^ Redman (2014), pp. 161–167.
- ^ Redman (2014), p. 166.
- ^ Kohlrausch (1844), pp. 575–576.
- ^ Redman (2014), p. 173.
- ^ Asprey (1986), p. 473.
- ^ Asprey (1986), p. 486.
- ^ Fraser (2000), pp. 380–381.
- ^ Clark (2006), pp. 254–255.
- ^ Fraser (2000), pp. 377–379.
- ^ Szabo (2008), pp. 179–182.
- ^ Fraser (2000), pp. 381–384.
- ^ Asprey (1986), p. 489.
- ^ Fraser (2000), pp. 384–385.
- ^ Szabo (2008), pp. 148–155.
- ^ Fraser (2000), pp. 387–389.
- ^ Asprey (1986), pp. 494–499.
- ^ Szabo (2008), pp. 162–169.
- ^ Fraser (2000), pp. 398–399.
- ^ Asprey (1986), pp. 501–506.
- ^ a b Szabo (2008), pp. 195–202.
- ^ Fraser (2000), pp. 404–405.
- ^ Fraser (2000), p. 395.
- ^ Asprey (1986), p. 500.
- ^ Fraser (2000), p. 406.
- ^ a b c Szabo (2008), pp. 232–233.
- ^ Fraser (2000), p. 414.
- ^ Showalter (2012), p. 250.
- ^ Luvaas (2009), p. 9.
- ^ a b c Stone (2006), p. 74.
- ^ Fraser (2000), pp. 419–421.
- ^ Fraser (2000), pp. 421–422.
- ^ Chisholm (1911), p. 353.
- ^ Carlyle (1865a). Chapter VI – Prince Henri Makes a March of Fifty Hours; The Russians Cannot Find Lodging in Silesia. Vol. Book XIX. pp. 544–549.
- ^ Fraser (2000), p. 423.
- ^ Carlyle (1865a). Chapter VIII – Miscellanea in Winter-Quarters, 1759–60. Vol. Book XIX. p. 615.
- ^ Carlyle (1865a). Chapter IX – Preliminaries to a Fifth Campaign, January–April 1760. Vol. Book XIX. pp. 629–630.
- ^ Carlyle (1865a). Chapter IX – Preliminaries to a Fifth Campaign, January–April 1760. Vol. Book XIX. pp. 632–636.
- ^ a b Fraser (2000), pp. 430–432
- ^ Szabo (2008), pp. 279–283.
- ^ Fraser (2000), pp. 432–433.
- ^ a b Carlyle (1865b). Chapter III – Battle of Liegnitz. Vol. Book XX. pp. 60–77.
- ^ a b Fraser (2000), p. 438
- ^ Duffy (1974), p. 194.
- ^ Szabo (2008), p. 293.
- ^ a b Duffy (1974), p. 196.
- ^ Redman (2014), p. 424.
- ^ Redman (2014), pp. 427–428.
- ^ Anderson (2000), p. 491.
- ^ Redman (2014), pp. 429–431.
- ^ Redman (2014), p. 435.
- ^ Redman (2014), p. 452.
- ^ Anderson (2000), p. 492.
- ^ Stone (2006), p. 75.
- ^ Redman (2014), p. 472.
- ^ a b Clark (2006), pp. 204–205.
- ^ Fraser (2000), pp. 457–460.
- ^ Anderson (2000), p. 498.
- ^ a b Fraser (2000), p. 469.
- ^ Mitford & Schillinger (2013), pp. 242–243.
- ^ Fraser (2000), p. 461.
- ^ Carlyle (1865b). Chapter XI – Seventh Campaign Opens. Vol. Book XX. pp. 289–299.
- ^ Fraser (2000), p. 464.
- ^ a b Carlyle (1865b). Chapter XII – Siege of Schweidnitz: Seventh Campaign Ends. Vol. Book XX. pp. 311–321.
- ^ a b c d e Schweizer (1989), p. 250.
- ^ Fraser (2000), pp. 467–468.
- ^ Hochedlinger (2003), p. 343.
- ^ Hochedlinger (2003), p. 345.
- ^ a b Carlyle (1865b). Chapter XIII – Peace of Hubertsburg. Vol. Book XX. pp. 329–332.
- ^ Browning (2005), p. 530.
- ^ Clark (2006), pp. 215–219.
- ^ a b Marston (2001), p. 90.
- ^ Clark (2006), p. 200.
- ^ a b Clark (2006), pp. 212–214.
- ^ Redman (2014), p. 425.
- ^ a b Clodfelter (2017), p. 85.
- ^ Clark (2006), pp. 210–213.
- ^ Duffy (1985), p. 245.
- ^ Clark (2006), p. 313.
- ^ Ingrao (1994), p. 198.
- ^ a b Clark (2006), p. 216.
- ^ Hochedlinger (2003), p. 346.
- ^ Clark (2006), p. 212.
- ^ Ingrao (1994), pp. 198–200.
- ^ Vocelka (2000), pp. 157–158.
- ^ Ingrao (1994), pp. 208–210.
- ^ Ingrao (1994), pp. 210–212.
- ^ Hochedlinger (2003), p. 267.
Sources
- ISBN 978-0-375-70636-3.
- ISBN 978-0-89919-352-6.
- .
- Black, Jeremy (1994). European Warfare, 1660–1815. London: ISBN 978-1-85728-172-9.
- Browning, Reed (April 2005). "New Views on the Silesian Wars". S2CID 159463824.
- )
- Carlyle, Thomas (1865b). Book XX – Friedrich Is Not to Be Overwhelmed: the Seven Years' War Gradually Ends – 25th April 1760 – 15th February 1763. Vol. VI. London: Chapman & Hall. )
- OCLC 873787655.
- ISBN 978-0-674-02385-7.
- Clodfelter, Micheal (2017). Warfare and Armed Conflicts: A Statistical Encyclopedia of Casualty and Other Figures, 1492–2015 (4th ed.). Jefferson, North Carolina: ISBN 978-0-7864-7470-7.
- ISBN 978-0-521-21730-9.
- ISBN 978-0-88254-277-5.
- Duffy, Christopher (1985). Frederick the Great: A Military Life. London: ISBN 978-0-415-00276-9.
- ISBN 978-0-7139-9377-6.
- Hochedlinger, Michael (2003). Austria's Wars of Emergence: War, State and Society in the Habsburg Monarchy, 1683–1797. London: ISBN 978-0-582-29084-6.
- ISBN 978-0-521-04545-2.
- ISBN 978-0-521-38009-6.
- Kohlrausch, Friedrich (1844). A History of Germany: From the Earliest Period to the Present Time. London: Chapman & Hall.
- ISBN 978-0-7867-4977-5.
- ISBN 978-1-4728-9564-6.
- ISBN 978-1-59017-623-8.
- Redman, Herbert (2014). Frederick the Great and the Seven Years' War, 1756–1763. Jefferson, North Carolina: ISBN 978-0-7864-7669-5.
- Schweizer, Karl W. (1989). England, Prussia, and the Seven Years War: Studies in Alliance Policies and Diplomacy. Lewiston, New York: ISBN 978-0-88946-465-0.
- Shennan, J. H. (2005). International Relations in Europe, 1689–1789. London: ISBN 978-1-134-89996-8.
- ISBN 978-1-78303-479-6.
- Stone, David (2006). A Military History of Russia: From Ivan the Terrible to the War in Chechnya. Westport, Connecticut: ISBN 978-0-275-98502-8.
- Szabo, Franz A. J. (2008). The Seven Years' War in Europe 1756–1763. London: ISBN 978-0-582-29272-7.
- Vocelka, Karl (2000). Geschichte Österreichs: Kultur, Gesellschaft, Politik (in German). Graz: ISBN 978-3-222-12825-7.
- ISBN 978-0-674-05809-5.
External links
- Hannay, David McDowall (1911). . Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 24 (11th ed.). pp. 715–723.