Topoisomerase inhibitor
Topoisomerase inhibitors are chemical compounds that block the action of topoisomerases, which are broken into two broad subtypes: type I topoisomerases (TopI) and type II topoisomerases (TopII).[1][2][3] Topoisomerase plays important roles in cellular reproduction and DNA organization, as they mediate the cleavage of single and double stranded DNA to relax supercoils, untangle catenanes, and condense chromosomes in eukaryotic cells.[1][2][3] Topoisomerase inhibitors influence these essential cellular processes. Some topoisomerase inhibitors prevent topoisomerases from performing DNA strand breaks while others, deemed topoisomerase poisons, associate with topoisomerase-DNA complexes and prevent the re-ligation step of the topoisomerase mechanism.[3] These topoisomerase-DNA-inhibitor complexes are cytotoxic agents, as the un-repaired single- and double stranded DNA breaks they cause can lead to apoptosis and cell death.[2][3] Because of this ability to induce apoptosis, topoisomerase inhibitors have gained interest as therapeutics against infectious and cancerous cells.
History
In the 1940s, great strides were made in the field of antibiotic discovery by researchers like Albert Schatz, Selman A. Waksman, and H. Boyd Woodruff that inspired significant effort to be allocated to the search for novel antibiotics.[4][5][6][7] Studies searching for antibiotic and anticancer agents in the mid to late 20th century have illuminated the existence of numerous unique families of both TopI and TopII inhibitors, with the 1960s alone resulting in the discovery of the camptothecin, anthracycline and epipodophyllotoxin classes.[8] Knowledge of the first topoisomerase inhibitors, and their medical potential as anticancer drugs and antibiotics, predates the discovery of the first topoisomerase (Escherichia. coli omega protein, a TopI) by Jim Wang in 1971.[9][10][11] In 1976, Gellert et al. detailed the discovery of the bacterial TopII DNA gyrase and discussed its inhibition when introduced to coumarin and quinolone class inhibitors, sparking greater interest in topoisomerase-targeting antibiotic and antitumor agents.[3][12] Topoisomerase inhibitors have been used as important experimental tools that have contributed to the discovery of some topoisomerases, as the quinolone nalidixic acid helped elucidate the bacterial TopII proteins it binds to.[11] Topoisomerase inhibitor classes have been derived from a wide variety of disparate sources, with some being natural products first extracted from plants (camptothecin,[10] etoposide[13]) or bacterial samples (doxorubicin,[14] indolocarbazole[15]), while others possess purely synthetic, and often accidental, origins (quinolone,[11] indenoisoquinoline[16]). After their initial discoveries, the structures of these classes have been fine tuned through the creation of derivatives in order to make safer, more effective, and are more easily administered variants.[10][11][16][17] Currently, topoisomerase inhibitors hold a prominent place among antibiotics and anticancer drugs in active medical use, as inhibitors like doxorubicin (anthracycline, TopII inhibitor[14]), etoposide (TopII inhibitor[13]), ciprofloxacin (fluoroquinolone, TopII inhibitor[18]), and irinotecan (camptothecin derivative, TopI inhibitor[19]) were all included in the 2019 WHO Model List for Essential Medicines.[20]
Topoisomerase I inhibitors
Mechanism
TopI relaxes DNA supercoiling during replication and transcription.[21][2] Under normal circumstances, TopI attacks the backbone of DNA, forming a transient TopI-DNA intermediate that allows for the rotation of the cleaved strand around the helical axis. TopI then re-ligates the cleaved strand to reestablish duplex DNA.[22][2] Treatment with TopI inhibitors stabilizes the intermediate cleavable complex, preventing DNA re-ligation, and inducing lethal DNA strand breaks.[22][23] Camptothecin-derived TopI inhibitors function by forming a ternary complex with TopI-DNA and are able to stack between the base pairs that flank the cleavage site due to their planar structure.[24] Normal cells have multiple DNA checkpoints that can initiate the removal of these stabilized complexes, preventing cell death. In cancer cells, however, these checkpoints are typically inactivated, making them selectively sensitive to TopI inhibitors.[22][23] Non-camptothecins, such as indenoisoquinolines and indolocarbazoles, also associate with TopI itself, forming hydrogen bonds with residues that typically confer resistance to camptothecin.[24] Indenosioquinolines and indolocarbazoles also lack the lactone ring present in camptothecin, making them more chemically stable and less prone to hydrolysis at biological pH.[22]
Anticancer drugs
Camptothecins
One of important structural feature of CPT is its planar pentacyclic ring and
Non-camptothecins
Despite the clinical success of the many CPT derivatives, they require long infusions, have low water solubility, and possess many side effects such as temporary liver dysfunction, severe diarrhea, and bone marrow damage.[28] Additionally, there has been an increase in observed single point mutations that have shown to prompt TopI resistance to CPT.[37] Therefore, three clinically relevant non-CPT inhibitors, indenoisoquinoline, phenanthridines, and indolocarbazoles, are currently being considered by the FDA as possible chemotherapies.[19] Among the non-CPT inhibitors, indolocarbazoles have shown the most promise. These inhibitors have unique advantages compared with the CPT. First, they are more chemically stable due to the absence of the lactone E-ring.[19] Second, indolocarbazoles attach to TopI at different sections of the DNA. Third, this inhibitor expresses less reversibility than CPT.[38] Therefore, they require shorter infusion times because the TopI inhibitor complex is less likely to dissociate.[19][38] Currently, several other indolocarbazoles are also undergoing clinical trials.[39] Other than indocarbazoles, topovale (ARC-111) is considered one of the most clinically developed phenanthridine. They have been promising in fighting colon cancer, but have shown limited effectiveness against breast cancer.[40]
The first member of the indolocarbazole family of topoisomerase inhibitors, BE-13793C, was discovered in 1991 by Kojiri et al.[15] It was produced by a streptomycete similar to Streptoverticillium mobaraense, and DNA relaxation assays revealed that BE-13793C is capable of inhibiting both TopI and TopII.[15] Soon after, more indolocarbazole variants were found with TopI specificity.[41]
Cushman et al. (1978) details the discovery of the first indenoisoquinoline, indeno[1,2-c]isoquinoline (NSC 314622), which was made accidentally in an attempt to synthesize nitidine chloride, an anticancer agent that does not inhibit topoisomerases.[16][38][42] Research on the anticancer activity of indenoisoquinoline ceased until the late 90s as interest grew for CPT class alternatives.[16] Since then, work on developing effective derivatives has been spearheaded by researchers like Dr. Mark Cushman at Purdue University and Dr. Yves Pommier at the National Cancer Institute.[16][43][44] As of 2015, indotecan (LMP-400) and indimitecan (LMP-776), derivatives of indeno[1,2-c]isoquinoline, were in phase one clinical trials for the treatment of relapsed solid tumors and lymphomas.[45][46]
Topoisomerase II inhibitors
Mechanism
Antibiotics
Aminocoumarins
Aminocoumarins (coumarins and simocyclinones) and quinolones are the two main classes of TopII inhibitors that function as antibiotics.[48] The aminocoimarins can be further divided into two groups:
- Traditional coumarin
- Simocyclioners
The coumarins group, which includes
Simocyclinones are another class of TopII antibiotics but differ from aminocoumarins in that they are composed of both aminocoumarins and a polyketide element. They also inhibit DNA gyrase's ability to bind to DNA instead of inhibiting ATPase activity, and produces several antibiotic classes.[30] These antibiotics are further divided into two group: actinomycin A and actinomycin B.[30] It was shown that both actinomycin A and actinomycin B were highly effective in killing gram-positive bacteria. Although simocyclinones are effective antibiotics, research has shown that one strain of aimocyclioners, S. antibioticus, cause streptomyces to produce antibiotics.[54]
Quinolones
Quinolones are amongst the most commonly used antibiotics for bacterial infections in humans, and are used to treat illness such as urinary infections, skin infections, sexually transmitted diseases (STD), tuberculosis and some anthrax infections.[53][30][10] The effectiveness of quinolones is proposed to be from chromosome fragments, which initiate the accumulation of reactive oxygen species that leads to apoptosis.[53] Quinolones can be divided into four generations:
- First generation: nalidixic acid[11]
- Second generation: cinoxacin, norfloxacin, ciprofloxacin[11]
- Third generation: levofloxacin, sparfloxacin[11]
- Fourth generation: moxifloxacin[11]
The first quinolone was discovered in 1962 by George Lesher and his co-workers at Sterling Drug (now owned by Sanofi) as an impurity collected while manufacturing
Currently, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has updated the public on eight new-generation fluoroquinolones: moxifloxacin, delafloxacin, ciprofloxacin, ciprofloxacin extended-release, gemifloxacin, levofloxacin, and ofloxacin.[18] It was observed that the new fluoroquinolones can cause hypoglycemia, high blood pressure, and mental health effects such as agitation, nervousness, memory impairment and delirium.[57][18]
Although quinolones are successful as antibiotics, their effectiveness is limited due to accumulation of small mutations and
Mechanically, the since disproven, Shen et al. (1989) model of quinolone inhibitor binding proposed that, in each DNAgyrase-DNA complex, four quinolone molecules associate with one another via hydrophobic interactions and form hydrogen bonds with the bases of separated, single stranded segments of DNA.[11][61][56] Shen et al. based their hypothesis on observations regarding the increased affinity and site specificity of quinolone binding to single stranded DNA compared to relaxed double stranded DNA.[61] A modified version of the Shen et al. model was still regarded as a likely mechanism in the mid to late 2000s,[11][62] but X-ray crystallography-based models of inhibitor-DNA-TopII complex stable intermediates developed in 2009 have since contradicted this hypothesis.[63][56] This newer model suggests that two quinolone molecules intercalate at the two DNA nick sites created by TopII, aligning with a hypothesis proposed by Leo et al. (2005).[64][56][47]
Anticancer therapeutics
Intercalating poison
TopII inhibitors have two main identification: poisons and catalytic inhibitors.[65][62] TopII poisons are characterized by their ability to create irreversible covalent bonds with DNA.[62] Furthermore, TopII poisons are divided into two groups: intercalating or non-intercalating poisons.[62][8] The anthracycline family, one of the most medically prevalent types of intercalating poisons, are able to treat a variety of cancer due to its diverse derivations and are often prescribed in combination with other chemotherapeutic medications.[14][62]
The first anthracycline (doxorubicin) was isolated from the bacteria Streptomyces peucetius in the 1960s.[14][17] Anthracyclines are composed of a core of four hexane rings, the central two of which are quinone and hydroquinone rings. A ring adjacent to the hydroquinone is connected to two substituents, a daunosamine sugar and a carbonyl with a varying side chain.[17] Currently, there are four main anthracyclines in medical use:
- Doxorubicin
- Daunorubicin (doxorubicin precursor)
- Epirubicin (a doxorubicin stereoisomer)
- Idarubicin (a daunorubicin derivative)[17]
Idarubicin is able to pass through cell membranes easier than daunorubicin and doxorubicin because it possesses less polar subunits, making it more lipophilic.[17][66] It is hypothesized that doxorubicin, which possesses a hydroxyl group and a methoxy group not present in idarubicin, can form hydrogen bonding aggregates with itself on the surface of phospholipid membranes, further reducing its ability to enter cells.[66]
Despite the success of these poisons, they have been shown that interaction poisons have a few limitations including 1) little inhibitor success of small compounds 2) anthracyclines' adverse effects such as membrane damage and secondary cancers due to oxygen-free radical generation 3) congestive heart failure.
Non-intercalating poisons
Another category of TopII poisons is known as non-intercalating poisons. The main non-intercalating TopII poisons are etoposide and teniposide. These non-intercalating poisons specifically target prokaryotic TopII in DNA by blocking transcription and replication.[62] Studies have shown that non-intercalating poisons play an important role in confining TopII-DNA covalent complexes.[62] Etoposide, a semi-synthetic derivative of epipodophyllotoxin is commonly used to study this apoptotic mechanism and include:
Both etoposide and teniposide are naturally occurring semi-synthetic derivatives of
Similarly, teniposide is another drug that helps treat leukemia. Teniposide functions very similarly to etoposide in that they are both phase specific and act during the late S and early G2 phases of the cell cycle.[70] However, teniposide is more protein-bound than etoposide.[70] Additionally, teniposide has a greater uptake, higher potency and greater binding affinity to cells compared to etoposide. Studies have shown that teniposide is an active anti-tumor agent and have been used in clinical settings to evaluate the efficacy of teniposide.[70] In a study performed by the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) and Lung Cancer Cooperative Group (LCCG), the results of toxicity of teniposide indicated hematologic and mild symptoms similar to etoposide.[70] However, the study found that the treatment outcome for patients with brain metastasis of SCLC had low survival and improvement rates.[70]
Mutations
Although the function of TopII poisons are not completely understood there is evidence that there is differences in structural specificity between intercalating and non-intercalating poisons. It is known that the difference between the two classifications of poisons rely on their biological activity and its role in the formation of the TopII-DNA covalent complexes.[71] More specifically, this difference occurs between the chromophore framework and the base pairs of DNA.[71] As a result of their structural specificity, slight differences in chemical amplification between antibiotics are seen.[71] Thus, this provides explanation on why theses drugs show differences in clinical activity in patients.[71]
Despite the difference in structural specificity, they both present mutations that result in anticancer drug resistance[71] In relation to intercalating poisons, it has been found that there are recurrent somatic mutations in the anthracyclines family.[72] Studies have shown that in DNA methyltransferase 3A (DNMT3A) the most frequent mutation is seen at arginine 882 (DNMT3AR882).[72] This mutation impacts patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) by initially responding to chemotherapy but relapsing afterwards.[72] The persistence of DNMT3AR882 cells induce hematopoietic stem cell expansion and promotes resistance to anthracycline chemotherapy.[72]
While there has not been enough research on specific mutations occurring among non-intercalating poisons, some studies have presented data regarding resistance to etoposide specifically in human leukemia cells (HL-60).[73] R. Ganapathi et al. reported that the alteration in activity of TopII as well as a reduced drug accumulation effect tumor cell resistance to epipodophyllotoxins and anthracyclines.[14] It has been proposed that the level of TopII activity is an important determination factor in drug sensitivity.[74] This study also indicated that hypophosphorylation of TopII in HL-60 cells when treated with calcium chelator (1,2-bis-(2-aminophenoxy)ethane-N,N,N',N'-tetraacetic acid acetoxymethyl ester) resulted in a > 2-fold reduction in etoposide-induced TopII-mediated DNA cleavable complex formation.[14] Scientists have indicated that this could be a plausible relationship between etoposide drug resistance and hypophosphorylation of HL-60 cells.[14] Additionally, a study reported by Yoshihito Matsumoto et al. showed an incidence of mutation and deletion in TopIIα mRNA of etoposide and m-amsacrine (mAMSA)-resistant cell lines.[75] TopIIα showed a decrease in activity and expression and an increase of multidrug resistance protein (MRP) levels. As a result, this diminished the intracellular target to etoposide and other TopII poisons.[75] Furthermore, it was found that phosphorylation of TopIIα from the resistant cells was more hypophsophorylated compared to the parental cells as well as loss of phosphorylation sites located in the C-terminal domain.[75] Other sources have seen this same trend and have reported hyperphosphorylation of TopII in etoposide-resistant cells and that the TopIIα located in these etoposide-resistant cells have a mutation at the amino acid residues Ser861-Phe.[74]
Catalytic inhibitors
Catalytic inhibitors are the other main identification of TopII inhibitors. Common catalytic inhibitors are Bisdioxopiperazine compounds and sometimes act competitively against TopII poisons. They function to target enzymes inside the cell thus inhibiting genetic processes such as DNA replication, and chromosome dynamics.[76] Additionally, catalytic poisons can interfere with ATPase and DNA strand passageways leading to stabilization of the DNA intermediate covalent complex.[77] Because of these unique functions, research has suggested that bis(2,6-dioxopiperazines) could potentially solve issues with cardiac toxicity caused by anti-tumor antibiotics.[78] Furthermore, in preclinical and clinical settings, bis(2,6-dioxopiperazines) is used to reduce the side effects of TopII poisons.[78] Common catalytic inhibitors that target TopII are dexrazoxane, novobiocin, merbarone and anthrycycline aclarubicin.
- Dexrazoxane
- Novobiocin
- Merbarone
- Anthrycycline aclarubicin
Dexrazoxane also known as ICRF-187 is currently the only clinically approved drug used in cancer patients to target and prevent anthrycycline mediated cardiotoxicity as well as prevent tissue injuries post extravasation of anthrocyclines.[79][80] Dexrazoxane functions to inhibit TopII and its effects on iron homeostasis regulation.[80] Dexrazoxane is a bisdioxopiperazine with iron-chelating, chemoprotective, cardioprotective, and antineoplastic activities.[81]
Novobiocin is also known as cathomycin, albamycin or streptonivicin and is an aminocoumarin antibiotic compound that functions to bind to DNA gyrase and inhibits ATPase activity.[82] It acts as a competitive inhibitor and specifically inhibits Hsp90 and TopII.[83] Novobiocin has been investigated and used in metastatic breast cancer clinical trials, non-small lung cancer cells and treatments for psoriasis when combined with nalidixic acid. Additionally, it is regularly used as a treatment for infections by gram-positive bacteria.[84] Novobiocin is derived from coumarin and the structure of novobiocin is similar to that of coumarin.
Synthetic lethality with deficient WRN expression
The analysis of 630 human primary tumors in 11 tissues shows that
A 2006 retrospective study, with long clinical follow-up, was made of colon cancer patients treated with the topoisomerase inhibitor irinotecan. In this study, 45 patients had hypermethylated WRN gene promoters and 43 patients had unmethylated WRN promoters.[85] Irinotecan was more strongly beneficial for patients with hypermethylated WRN promoters (39.4 months survival) than for those with unmethylated WRN promoters (20.7 months survival). Thus, a topoisomerase inhibitor appeared to be especially synthetically lethal with deficient WRN expression. Further evaluations have also indicated synthetic lethality of deficient expression of WRN and topoisomerase inhibitors.[87][88][89][90][91]
References
- ^ ISBN 9781605357072.
- ^ ISBN 9781464126116.
- ^ PMID 29363591.
- PMID 16560371.
- S2CID 205935691.
- S2CID 52889274.
- ^ PMID 7049379.
- ^ PMID 30404148.
- PMID 32975138.
- ^ S2CID 41392556.
- ^ PMID 15700957.
- PMID 186775.
- ^ S2CID 31424235.
- ^ S2CID 208060979.
- ^ PMID 1652582.
- ^ PMID 11020283.
- ^ PMID 28185035.
- ^ a b c Research Cf (2019-04-15). "FDA reinforces safety information about serious low blood sugar levels and mental health side effects with fluoroquinolone antibiotics; requires label changes". FDA.
- ^ PMID 29312794.
- ^ World Health Organization Model List of Essential Medicines, 21st List, 2019. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2019. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.
- S2CID 46985043.
- ^ PMID 19476377.
- ^ PMID 20534341.
- ^ S2CID 25135019.
- .
- ISBN 978-0-444-63929-5, retrieved 2020-12-20
- PMID 25808858.
- ^ PMID 11880543.
- PMID 2997227.
- ^ PMID 15801827.
- S2CID 25448878.
- S2CID 195692628.
- ISSN 0300-5127.
- ^ PMID 8955649.
- ^ S2CID 14747493.
- ^ Arno Therapeutics (2014-12-08). "A Phase 2 Study of AR-67 (7-t-butyldimethylsiltyl-10-hydroxy-camptothecin) in Adult Patients With Recurrence of Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM) or Gliosarcoma".
- PMID 11504505.
- ^ ISSN 0022-3263.
- PMID 12678746.
- PMID 14679002.
- PMID 1333791.
- PMID 31956371.
- PMID 28177250.
- ^ "Yves Pommier, M.D., Ph.D." Center for Cancer Research. 2014-08-12. Retrieved 2020-12-13.
- PMID 26287259.
- ^ "A Phase I Study of Indenoisoquinolines LMP400 and LMP776 in Adults with Relapsed Solid Tumors and Lymphomas". 15 June 2021.
- ^ PMID 24576155.
- ^ PMID 30505655.
- ^ PMID 12963818.
- PMID 21048526.
- PMID 26600742.
- PMID 8635474.
- ^ PMID 11254893.
- ISSN 0922-338X.
- ^ S2CID 24531327.
- ^ S2CID 23776629.
- PMID 1767803.
- PMID 21904817.
- PMID 19747119.
- ^ PMID 1656869.
- ^ PMID 2546585.
- ^ PMID 19377506.
- S2CID 24498996.
- S2CID 29092424.
- PMID 31399497.
- ^ PMID 32771749.
- PMID 9615861.
- ^ S2CID 33161084.
- ^ PMID 6277188.
- ^ PMID 11013281.
- ^ ISBN 978-94-011-1934-4, retrieved 2020-12-15
- ^ PMID 27841873.
- PMID 8700130.
- ^ PMID 23914174.
- ^ PMID 11676865.
- PMID 9748552.
- PMID 3041238.
- ^ PMID 9615863.
- PMID 25246808.
- ^ PMID 9888268.
- ^ PubChem. "Dexrazoxane". pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. Retrieved 2020-12-10.
- ^ "Novobiocin". go.drugbank.com. Retrieved 2020-12-10.
- ^ "NCATS Inxight: Drugs — NOVOBIOCIN". drugs.ncats.io. Retrieved 2020-12-10.
- ^ PubChem. "Novobiocin". pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. Retrieved 2020-12-10.
- ^ PMID 16723399.
- PMID 20934517.
- PMID 24359226.
- S2CID 18189226.
- PMID 22797812.
- PMID 17917271.
- S2CID 21078795.
Bibliography
- Antony S, Agama KK, Miao ZH, Takagi K, Wright MH, Robles AI, Varticovski L, Nagarajan M, Morrell A, Cushman M, Pommier Y (Nov 2007). "Novel indenoisoquinolines NSC 725776 and NSC 724998 produce persistent topoisomerase I cleavage complexes and overcome multidrug resistance". Cancer Res. 67 (21): 10397–405. PMID 17974983.
- Antony S, Agama KK, Miao ZH, Hollingshead M, Holbeck SL, Wright MH, Varticovski L, Nagarajan M, Morrell A, Cushman M, Pommier Y (2006). "Bisindenoisoquinoline bis-1,3-{(5,6-dihydro-5,11-diketo-11H-indeno[1,2-c]isoquinoline)-6-propylamino}propane bis(trifluoroacetate) (NSC 727357), a DNA intercalator and topoisomerase inhibitor with antitumor activity". Mol. Pharmacol. 70 (3): 1109–1120. S2CID 15829471.
- Antony S, Kohlhagen G, Agama K, Jayaraman M, Cao S, Durrani FA, Rustum YM, Cushman M, Pommier Y (Feb 2005). "Cellular topoisomerase I inhibition and antiproliferative activity by MJ-III-65 (NSC 706744), an indenoisoquinoline topoisomerase I poison". Mol. Pharmacol. 67 (2): 523–30. S2CID 6220324.
- Antony S, Jayaraman M, Laco G, Kohlhagen G, Kohn KW, Cushman M, Pommier Y (Nov 2003). "Differential induction of topoisomerase I-DNA cleavage complexes by the indenoisoquinoline MJ-III-65 (NSC 706744) and camptothecin: base sequence analysis and activity against camptothecin-resistant topoisomerases I.". Cancer Res. 63 (21): 7428–35. PMID 14612542.
- Bakshi RP, Sang D, Morrell A, Cushman M, Shapiro TA (Jan 2009). "Activity of indenoisoquinolines against African trypanosomes". Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 53 (1): 123–8. PMID 18824603.
- Baxter J, Diffley JF (Jun 2008). "Topoisomerase II inactivation prevents the completion of DNA replication in budding yeast". Molecular Cell. 30 (6): 790–802. PMID 18570880.
- Burgess DJ, Doles J, Zender L, Xue W, Ma B, McCombie WR, Hannon GJ, Lowe SW, Hemann MT (Jul 2008). "Topoisomerase levels determine chemotherapy response in vitro and in vivo". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 105 (26): 9053–8. PMID 18574145.
- Cho WJ, Le QM, My Van HT, Youl Lee K, Kang BY, Lee ES, Lee SK, Kwon Y (Jul 2007). "Design, docking, and synthesis of novel indeno[1,2-c]isoquinolines for the development of antitumor agents as topoisomerase I inhibitors". Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 17 (13): 3531–4. PMID 17498951.
- Cinelli MA, Cordero B, Dexheimer TS, Pommier Y, Cushman M (Oct 2009). "Synthesis and biological evaluation of 14-(aminoalkyl-aminomethyl)aromathecins as topoisomerase I inhibitors: investigating the hypothesis of shared structure-activity relationships". Bioorg. Med. Chem. 17 (20): 7145–55. PMID 19783447.
- Cinelli MA, Morrell AE, Dexheimer TS, Agama K, Agrawal S, Pommier Y, Cushman M (Aug 2010). "The structure-activity relationships of A-ring-substituted aromathecin topoisomerase I inhibitors strongly support a camptothecin-like binding mode". Bioorg. Med. Chem. 18 (15): 5535–52. PMID 20630766.
- Cinelli MA, Morrell A, Dexheimer TS, Scher ES, Pommier Y, Cushman C (Aug 2008). "Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of 14-substituted aromathecins as Topoisomerase I inhibitors". J. Med. Chem. 51 (15): 4609–19. PMID 18630891.
- Cushman M, Jayaraman M, Vroman JA, Fukunaga AK, Fox BM, Kohlhagen G, Strumberg D, Pommier Y (Oct 2000). "Synthesis of new indeno[1,2-c]isoquinolines: cytotoxic non-camptothecin topoisomerase I inhibitors". J. Med. Chem. 43 (20): 3688–98. PMID 11020283.
- Holleran JL, Parise RA, Yellow-Duke AE, Egorin MJ, Eiseman JL, Covey JM, Beumer JH (Sep 2010). "Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometric assay for the quantitation in human plasma of the novel indenoisoquinoline topoisomerase I inhibitors, NSC 743400 and NSC 725776". J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 52 (5): 714–20. PMID 20236781.
- Ioanoviciu A, Antony S, Pommier Y, Staker BL, Stewart L, Cushman M (2005). "Synthesis and mechanism of action studies of a series of norindenoisoquinoline topoisomerase I poisons reveal an inhibitor with a flipped orientation in the ternary DNA-enzyme-inhibitor complex as determined by X-ray crystallographic analysis". J. Med. Chem. 48 (15): 4803–14. PMID 16033260.
- Kinders RJ, Hollingshead M, Lawrence S, Ji J, Tabb B, Bonner WM, Pommier Y, Rubinstein L, Evrard YA, Parchment RE, Tomaszewski J, Doroshow JH (Nov 2010). "Development of a validated immunofluorescence assay for yH2AX as a pharmacodynamic marker of topoisomerase I inhibitor activity". Clin. Cancer Res. 16 (22): 5447–57. PMID 20924131.
- Kiselev E, Dexheimer TS, Pommier Y, Cushman M (Dec 2010). "Design, synthesis, and evaluation of dibenzo[c,h][1,6]naphthyridines as topoisomerase I inhibitors and potential anticancer agents". J. Med. Chem. 53 (24): 8716–26. PMID 21090809.
- Marchand C, Antony S, Kohn KW, Cushman M, Ioanoviciu A, Staker BL, Burgin AB, Stewart L, Pommier Y (Feb 2006). "A novel norindenoisoquinoline structure reveals a common interfacial inhibitor paradigm for ternary trappingof topoisomerase I-DNA covalent complexes". Mol. Cancer Ther. 5 (2): 287–95. PMID 16505102.
- Morrell A, Placzek M, Parmley S, Grella B, Antony S, Pommier Y, Cushman M (Sep 2007). "Optimization of the indenone ring of indenoisoquinoline topoisomerase I inhibitors". J. Med. Chem. 50 (18): 4388–404. PMID 17676830.
- Morrell A, Placzek M, Parmley S, Antony S, Dexheimer TS, Pommier Y, Cushman M (Sep 2007). "Nitrated indenoisoquinolines as topoisomerase I inhibitors: a systematic study and optimization". J. Med. Chem. 50 (18): 4419–30. PMID 17696418.
- Morrell A, Jayaraman M, Nagarajan M, Fox BM, Meckley MR, Ioanoviciu A, Pommier Y, Antony S, Hollingshead M, Cushman M (Aug 2006). "Evaluation of indenoisoquinoline topoisomerase I inhibitors usinga hollow fiber assay". Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 16 (16): 4395–9. PMID 16750365.
- Nagarajan M, Morrell A, Antony S, Kohlhagen G, Agama K, Pommier Y, Ragazzon PA, Garbett NC, Chaires JB, Hollingshead M, Cushman M (Aug 2006). "Synthesis and biological evaluation of bisindenoisoquinolines as topoisomerase I inhibitors" (PDF). J. Med. Chem. 49 (17): 5129–40. PMID 16913702.
- Nagarajan M, Xiao X, Antony S, Kohlhagen G, Pommier Y, Cushman M (2003). "Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of indenoisoquinoline topoisomerase I inhibitors featuring polyamine side chains on the lactam nitrogen". J. Med. Chem. 46 (26): 5712–24. PMID 14667224.
- Pfister TD, Reinhold WC, Agama K, Gupta S, Khin SA, Kinders RJ, Parchment RE, Tomaszewski JE, Doroshow JH, Pommier Y (Jul 2009). "Topoisomerase I levels in the NCI-60 cancer cell line panel determined by validated ELISA and microarray analysis and correlation with indenoisoquinoline sensitivity". Mol. Cancer Ther. 8 (7): 1878–84. PMID 19584232.
- Pommier Y, Cushman M (May 2009). "The indenoisoquinoline noncamptothecin topoisomerase I inhibitors: update and perspectives". Mol. Cancer Ther. 8 (5): 1008–14. PMID 19383846.
- Pommier Y, Leo E, Zhang H, Marchand C (May 2010). "DNA topoisomerases and their poisoning by anticancer and antibacterial drugs". Chem. Biol. 17 (5): 421–33. PMID 20534341.
- Pommier Y (Jul 2009). "DNA topoisomerase I inhibitors: chemistry, biology, and interfacial inhibition". Chem. Rev. 109 (7): 2894–902. PMID 19476377.
- Pommier Y (2006). "Topoisomerase I inhibitors: camptothecins and beyond". Nat. Rev. Cancer. 6 (10): 789–802. S2CID 25135019.
- Pommier Y (2004). "Camptothecins and topoisomerase I: a foot in the door. Targeting the genome beyond topoisomerase I with camptothecins and novel anticancer drugs: importance of DNA replication, repair and cell cycle checkpoints". Curr. Med. Chem. Anti-Cancer Agents. 4 (5): 429–34. S2CID 1468756.
- Song Y, Shao Z, Dexheimer TS, Scher ES, Pommier Y, Cushman M (Mar 2010). "Structure-based design, synthesis, and biological studies of new anticancer norindenoisoquinoline topoisomerase I inhibitors". J. Med. Chem. 53 (5): 1979–89. PMID 20155916.
- Sordet O, Goldman A, Redon C, Solier S, Rao VA, Pommier Y (Aug 2008). "Topoisomerase I requirement for death receptor-induced apoptotic nuclear fission". J. Biol. Chem. 283 (34): 23200–8. PMID 18556653.
- Staker BL, Feese MD, Cushman M, Pommier Y, Zembower D, Stewart L, Burgin AB (Apr 2005). "Structures of three classes of anticancer agents bound to the human topoisomerase I-DNA covalent complex". J. Med. Chem. 48 (7): 2336–45. PMID 15801827.
- Teicher BA (2008). "Next generation topoisomerase I inhibitors: rationale and biomarker strategies". Biochem. Pharmacol. 75 (6): 1262–71. PMID 18061144.
- Seng CH, Chen YL, Lu PJ, Yang CN, Tzeng CC (2008). "Synthesis and antiproliferative evaluation of certain indeno[1,2-c]quinoline derivatives". Bioorg. Med. Chem. 16 (6): 3153–62. PMID 18180162.
- Tuduri S, Crabbé L, Conti C, Tourrière H, Holtgreve-Grez H, Jauch A, Pantesco V, DeVos J, Thomas A, Theillet C, Pommier Y, Tazi J, Coquelle A, Pasero P (Nov 2009). "Topoisomerase I suppresses genomic instability by preventing interference between replication and transcription". Nat. Cell Biol. 11 (11): 1315–24. PMID 19838172.
- Van HT, Le QM, Lee KY, Lee ES, Kwon Y, Kim TS, Le TN, Lee SH, Cho WJ (Nov 2007). "Convenient synthesis of indeno[1,2-c]isoquinolines as constrained forms of 3-arylisoquinolines and docking study of a topoisomerase I inhibitor into DNA-topoisomerase I complex". Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 17 (21): 5763–7. PMID 17827007.)
{{cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link - Nagarajan M., Morrell A., Ioanoviciu A., Antony S., Kohlhagen G., Hollingshead M., Pommier Y., Cushman M. (2006). "Synthesis and Evaluation of Indenoisoquinoline Topoisomerase I Inhibitors Substituted with Nitrogen Heterocycles". J. Med. Chem. 49 (21): 6283–6289. PMID 17034134.