Torvosaurus

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Torvosaurus
Temporal range:
Ma
Mounted T. tanneri skeletal reconstruction,
Museum of Ancient Life
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Domain: Eukaryota
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Clade: Dinosauria
Clade: Saurischia
Clade: Theropoda
Family: Megalosauridae
Subfamily:
Megalosaurinae
Genus: Torvosaurus
Galton & Jensen, 1979
Type species
Torvosaurus tanneri
Galton & Jensen, 1979
Other species
  • T. gurneyi
    Hendrickx & Mateus, 2014
Synonyms

Torvosaurus (

megalosaurine theropod dinosaur that lived approximately 165 to 148 million years ago during the Callovian to Tithonian ages of the late Middle and Late Jurassic period in what is now Colorado, Portugal, Germany, and possibly England, Spain, Tanzania, and Uruguay. It contains two currently recognized species, Torvosaurus tanneri and Torvosaurus gurneyi, plus a third unnamed species from Germany.[1]

In 1979, the

bipedal carnivore that could grow to a length of about 9 meters (30 ft) and weigh approximately 2 metric tons (2.2 short tons). T. tanneri was among the largest terrestrial carnivores of its time, alongside Epanterias and Saurophaganax (which could both be synonymous with Allosaurus). Specimens of Torvosaurus gurneyi were measured up to 10–11 meters (33–36 ft) in length and 4–5 metric tons (4.4–5.5 short tons) in body mass,[2][3]
suggesting that it was much larger than T. tanneri and was the largest terrestrial carnivore in Europe during the late Jurassic. Based on bone morphology, Torvosaurus is thought to have had very powerful short arms.

Discovery

Reconstructed T. tanneri skull, Museo Capellini of Bologna, Italy


Fossilized remains of Torvosaurus have been found in

Elmer Riggs in the "Freeze-out Hills" of southeastern Wyoming, 18 kilometers (11 mi) northwest of Medicine Bow. The material consisted of part of the left foot and right hand and they were taken to the Field Museum of Natural History in Chicago, where they were stored until being re-discovered around 2010. The specimen was assigned to Torvosaurus tanneri after being described in 2014.[4]

More remains of a large

theropod that is now believed to have been Torvosaurus were discovered in the Tendaguru Formation of Tanzania and was named "Megalosaurus" ingens by Werner Janensch in 1920, based on the specimen MB R 1050, a 12-centimeter (4.7 in) long tooth from German East Africa (now Tanzania).[5] It was eventually reclassified as a probable member of Carcharodontosauridae before being reclassified as a probable member of the Torvosaurus genus in 2020.[6] Although it was only referred to as Torvosaurus sp., one commentator has noted it could potentially be called Torvosaurus ingens.[7][8] Soto et al. described teeth of a member of the genus Torvosaurus from the Tacuarembó Formation of Uruguay. The authors noted that some of the specimens of “Megalosaurus” ingens figured by Werner Janensch share the features of the Uruguayan material and stated that the materials from Tanzania and Uruguay may represent the same taxon, due to geographical proximity, but ultimately concluded that, based on only teeth, they do not share any derived characteristics to distinguish them from the described species of the genus, T. tanneri and T. gurneyi.[6][9] However, Rauhut et al. consider the teeth to be undiagnostic, being coherent in size and shape with a variety of other theropods (including carcharodontosaurids), thus considering their attribution to the genus to be problematic.[1]

In 1971, Vivian Jones of

Peter Malcolm Galton and Jensen.[10] The genus name Torvosaurus derives from the Latin word torvus, meaning "savage", and the Greek word sauros (σαυρος), meaning "lizard".[11] The specific name tanneri comes from the, first counselor in the First Presidency of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, Nathan Eldon Tanner
.

In 1985, Jensen could report a considerable amount of additional material, among it being the first skull elements.[12] The fossils from Colorado were further described by Brooks Britt in 1991.[13] The holotype, BYU 2002, originally consisted of upper and lower arm bones. The paratypes included some back bones, hip bones, and hand bones.[10] When the material described in 1985 is added, the main missing elements are the shoulder girdle and the thighbone.[13] The original thumb claw, specimen BYUVP 2020, was only provisionally referred, as it had been found in a site 195 kilometers (121 mi) away from the Dry Mesa Quarry.[10] The holotype and paratypes represented at least three individuals, these being two adults and a juvenile.[13] In 1991, Britt concluded that there was no proof that the front limbs of the holotype were associated and chose the left humerus as the lectotype.[13] Several single bones and teeth found in other American sites have been referred to Torvosaurus.[13]

Maxillae of T. gurneyi and T. tanneri compared

In 1992, fossils of a large theropod found at

junior synonym of Torvosaurus,[15] but a detailed analysis has not been carried out yet.[16] The same site has rendered comparable remains for which the nomen nudum Brontoraptor has been used.[17][18] Most researchers now regard both specimens as belonging to Torvosaurus tanneri.[2] However, Edmarka rex and Brontoraptor require reclassification to determine whether or not they actually belong to T. tanneri, as all the specimens described prior to their discovery indicate that they reached their adult size and both incomplete specimens lack detailed osteological descriptions.[19]

In 2012, a still undescribed, 55% complete specimen was discovered in Colorado in the Skull Creek Quarry, which is an exposure of the Morrison Formation. The specimen, nicknamed "Elvis", included the pelvic, spine, and hind limb bones, a complete, associated backbone, as well as cranial elements. It is the most complete specimen of Torvosaurus found to date.[20] A mounted skeleton of the specimen, with missing parts reconstructed with casts from other Torvosaurus specimens, is currently on display in the Museum of Natural History & Science in Cincinnati.[20][21]

In 2000, material from Portugal was referred to a Torvosaurus sp. by Octávio Mateus and Miguel Telles Antunes.[22] In 2006, fossils from the Portuguese Lourinhã Formation were referred to Torvosaurus tanneri.[3] In 2012, however, Matthew Carrano et al. concluded that this material could not be more precisely determined than a Torvosaurus sp.[23] In 2013 and 2014, eggs with and without embryos were reported from Portugal and referred to Torvosaurus.[24][25] The species from Portugal was named T. gurneyi in honor of James Gurney in 2014, the creator of the Dinotopia series of books. It is the largest named theropod known from Europe, although an isolated anterior caudal vertebra from the Vega Formation in Spain, which may belong to Torvosaurus or a closely related taxon, is about 15% larger than the one found on T. gurneyi.[2][26] It was the morphological distinctiveness of the holotype maxilla ML1100 that led to the naming of the Portuguese species.[2] In 2017, a set of Portuguese cranial material assigned to Torvosaurus was described, including a specimen interpreted as belonging to the same individual as the holotype of Torvosaurus gurneyi.[27]

In 2020, Soto et al. described FC-DPV 2971, a tooth from Uruguay, as belonging to a new unnamed species of Torvosaurus.[6] They also assigned Megalosaurus/Ceratosaurus ingens (specimen MB R 1050) from Tanzania to Torvosaurus.[6] Also in 2020, a fragmentary maxilla referable to Torvosaurus was described from the middle Callovian Ornatenton Formation of Germany. This is the oldest record of the genus and suggests that megalosaurines originated in Europe, or at least that Europe was a biogeographical turntable for them from the Middle to the early Late Jurassic. Other possible Torvosaurus instances in Europe include fragmentary remains from the Kimmeridge Clay of England that possibly belong to the genus.[1] These consist of a tibia (OUMNH J.29886) and a maxilla fragment that were collected separately from each other.[23]

Description

Restoration of T. tanneri

Torvosaurus was a very large and robust predatory dinosaur, with an estimated maximum body length of 10–11 meters (33–36 ft) and mass of 4–5 metric tons (4.4–5.5 short tons) for the Portuguese species T. gurneyi,[2][3] making T. gurneyi among the largest terrestrial carnivores of the Jurassic. Claims have been made indicating even larger sizes for the American species T. tanneri up to 12 m (39 ft) in length and more than 4 t (4.4 short tons) based on incomplete remains of Edmarka rex and Brontoraptor.[28][16][29] However, these claims regarding T. tanneri are likely erroneous, as the discovered remains of T. tanneri indicate that they reached adult size at 9 meters (30 ft) in length and approximately 2 metric tons (2.2 short tons) in body mass.[13][30][31][32] Furthermore, Edmarka rex and Brontoraptor lack detailed analyses to verify whether or not they actually belong to T. tanneri.[19][16]

Among the differentiating features originally recognized between T. gurneyi and T. tanneri are the number of teeth, alongside the size and shape of the mouth. While the upper jaw of T. tanneri has more than 11 teeth, that of T. gurneyi has less.[2] However, later examination of a new right maxilla, probably belonging to the same individual as the holotype of T. gurneyi, has determined that, while the two species can be distinguished based on the morphology of the maxillary medial wall and interdental plates, the supposedly lower number of maxillary teeth in the Portuguese form may be an artifact of preservation, since it is not possible to know the exact number of teeth in the complete maxilla at the moment.[27]

The material from Germany is further distinguished by the other two species by a temporal difference of c. 10 Ma and a few morphological differences which indicate that it was the third species outside a sister taxon relationship between T. tanneri and T. gurneyi. The material is only 10% smaller than the maxilla of T. tanneri, although the ontogenetic stage of the specimen is unknown. This indicates that derived megalosaurines were already among the largest terrestrial predators of the late Middle Jurassic, with only a moderate increase in size in the genus by the Late Jurassic.[1]

Skeletal restoration showing the size of T. gurneyi, known remains highlighted

Torvosaurus had an elongated, narrow snout, with a kink in its profile just above the large nostrils. The frontmost snout bone, the

pubic bones and the ischia contacting each other and forming a vaulted closed underside.[13]

Systematics and classification

Torvosaurus sp. in Japan

When first described in 1979 by Galton and Jensen,

spinosaurids.[15]

The following is a cladogram based on the phylogenetic analysis conducted by Carrano, Benson, and Sampson (2012) showing the relationships of Torvosaurus:[15]

Megalosauroidea

Distinguishing anatomical features

Caudal vertebra of T. gurneyi

According to Carrano et al. (2012), Torvosaurus can be distinguished based on the following characteristics:[38]

  • The presence of a very shallow maxillary fossa (it lacks a fenestra maxillaris piercing the bone wall)
  • The presence of fused interdental plates
  • The pneumatic fossae in the posterior dorsal and the anterior caudal vertebrae centra being expanded to form enlarged, deep openings
  • The puboischiadic plate being highly ossified (the paired bony plates of both sides connect and close off the entire underside of the pelvis, a very basal trait that Galton & Jensen saw as an indication that Theropoda was polyphyletic, with Carnosauria having independently evolved from carnivorous Prosauropoda)[10]
  • A distal expansion of the ischium shaft with a prominent lateral midline crest and an ovalur outline when examined in lateral view
  • The cervical vertebrae are opisthocoelous with a pronounced flat rim around the anterior ball (according to Rauhut, 2000)
  • A transverse fenestra is situated in the neural arch of the dorsal vertebrae in front of the hyposphene (according to Rauhut, 2000)[39]

Paleobiology

Teeth of Torvosaurus gurneyi.

The study of fossilized embryos of Torvosaurus provides researchers with information about the transformation of the embryo over time, the different developmental pathways present in dinosaur lineages, dinosaur reproductive behavior, and dinosaur parental care.[40][41][42] In 2013, Araújo et al. announced the discovery of specimen ML1188, a clutch of crushed dinosaur eggs and embryonic material attributed to Torvosaurus.[43] This discovery further supports the hypothesis that large theropods were oviparous, meaning that they laid eggs and hence that embryonic development occurred outside the body of female dinosaurs. This discovery was made in 2005 by the Dutch amateur fossil-hunter Aart Walen at the Lourinhã Formation in Western Portugal in fluvial overbank sediments that are considered to be from the Tithonian age of the Jurassic, approximately 152 to 145 million years ago. This discovery is paleontologically significant for a number of reasons: (a) these are the most primitive dinosaur embryos known; (b) these are the only basal theropod embryos known; (c) fossilized eggs and embryos are rarely found together; (d) it represents the first evidence of a one-layered eggshell for theropod dinosaurs; and (e) it allows researchers to link a new eggshell morphology to the osteology of a particular group of theropod dinosaurs.[24] The specimen is housed at the Museu da Lourinhã in Portugal. As the eggs were abandoned due to unknown circumstances, it is not known if Torvosaurus provided parental care to its eggs and young or abandoned them shortly after laying.[44] However, the eggshells are highly porous, allowing efficient gaseous exchange between the external and internal media, thus indicating the eggs were buried for incubation within substrate in a manner similar to modern seaturtles. This is also corroborated by the undisturbed taphonomic setting and low-energy geological context.[24]

All documented Torvosaurus specimens from the Morrison Formation are from similarly sized, likely adult individuals and the lack of immature individuals may be explained by many factors, none of which are mutually exclusive. For one thing, the formation is known to preserve large vertebrates better than smaller ones. Immature individuals may also have occupied a different ecological niche from adults in habitats where their remains were likely to preserve as fossils and they may have been the prey of choice of larger predators as well. Torvosaurus may also have experienced Type B1 population survivorship, as has been found in other dinosaurs, with mortality increasing after sexual maturity was achieved, leading to an abundance of mature individuals in the fossil record. A final possibility is that immature Torvosaurus remains could be misidentified due to having different proportions compared to the very large and robust adults.[4]

Paleoecology

Claw cast of T. tanneri, Natural History Museum, London

Provenance and occurrence

The type specimen of Torvosaurus tanneri, BYU 2002, was recovered in the Dry Mesa Quarry of the Brushy Basin Member of the Morrison Formation in Montrose County, Colorado. The specimen was collected by James A. Jensen and Kenneth Stadtman in 1972 in medium-grained, coarse sandstone that was deposited during the Tithonian and Kimmeridgian ages of the Jurassic, approximately 153 to 148 million years ago.[45] This specimen is housed in the collection of Brigham Young University in Provo, Utah.

Fauna and habitat in North America

Studies suggest that the

Othnielosaurus, Gargoyleosaurus, and Stegosaurus.[47]

The flora of the period has been revealed by fossils of

Fauna and habitat in Europe

Femur and tibia referred to T. gurneyi

The Ornatenton Formation is a Callovian aged shallow marine deposit, within the formation Torvosaurus was sympatric with the closely related and also large Wiehenvenator. The Lourinhã Formation is Kimmeridgian-Tithonian in age. The environment is coastal and therefore has a strong marine influence. Its flora and fauna are very similar to that of the Morrison. Torvosaurus appears to be the top predator here. It lived alongside the European species of Allosaurus (A. europaeus), Ceratosaurus, Stegosaurus, and presumably Camptosaurus. The theropod Lourinhanosaurus also stalked the area. Lusotitan was the largest sauropod in the region, while the diplodocids Dinheirosaurus and Lourinhasaurus were also present. Dacentrurus and Miragaia were both stegosaurs, while Dracopelta was an ankylosaurian. Draconyx was an iguanodontid related to Camptosaurus. Due to the marine nature of the Lourinhã Formation, sharks, plesiochelyid turtles, and teleosaurid crocodyliforms are also present.[48]

Fauna and habitat in Africa

The small-scale trough and ripple cross-bedded fine-grained sandstone at the base of the Upper Dinosaur Member of the Tendaguru Formation, of which possible Torvosaurus material is known from, is interpreted as tidal flat deposits. Stagnant water bodies, such as small lakes and ponds, were present and a freshwater depositional environment close to the sea was also probably present.

The possible unnamed Torvosaurus species from the Tendaguru Formation would have shared its habitat with many species of

amphibians, including an unnamed lissamphibian, and sharks are also present.[49]

Fauna and habitat in South America

Within South America, possible Torvosaurus remains are only present within the

lakes
.

If present, Torvosaurus would probably have been the

bivalves, such as Diplodon, are also present.[51][52]

Coexistence with other large carnivores

Torvosaurus coexisted with other large theropods such as Allosaurus, Ceratosaurus, and Saurophaganax in the United States, Allosaurus, Ceratosaurus, and Lourinhanosaurus in Portugal, possibly Veterupristisaurus in Tanzania, and possibly cf. Ceratosaurus (?) in Uruguay. The three, possibly four, species appear to have had different ecological niches, based on anatomy and the location of fossils. Torvosaurus and Ceratosaurus may have preferred to be active around waterways and had lower, more sinuous, bodies that would have given them an advantage in forest and underbrush terrains, whereas Allosaurus had shorter bodies, longer legs, were faster and less maneuverable, and seem to have preferred dry floodplains.[53] Also, Rauhut et al. (2016) proposed that allosaurids and megalosaurids would have had different environmental preferences, the former being more common in inland areas, while the latter being dominant in marine and coastal environments.[54]

On the other hand, the majority of Torvosaurus remains from the Morrison Formation have been found in localities preserving multiple taxa, including Allosaurus, with Torvosaurus itself being a minor component of the bonebeds. This pattern has been interpreted as indicative of Torvosaurus sharing habitats with other predators, most notably Allosaurus, but at much lower abundances.[4] The three may also have had different dietary preferences, with Allosaurus being more suited for bone slicing (thanks to its short and stout serrated teeth, deep and narrow skull, and powerful dorsoventral movement capacity of the neck), while Ceratosaurus, with its long and blade-like teeth and relatively straight neck, would have probably been incapable of doing so, instead concentrating on the deepest organs of a carcass. While probably capable of some bone consumption, Torvosaurus, with its large skull and teeth and large, powerful, and lithe body may have been specialized in opening up and dismembering exceptionally large sauropod carcasses. This would have allowed smaller theropods, like Allosaurus, better access in a possible commensalism relationship.[55]

Allosaurus was itself a potential food item to other carnivores, as illustrated by an Allosaurus pubic foot marked by the teeth of another theropod, probably Ceratosaurus or Torvosaurus. The location of the bone in the body (along the bottom margin of the torso and partially shielded by the legs) and the fact that it was among the most massive in the skeleton indicates that the Allosaurus was being scavenged.[56]

Dry season at the Mygatt-Moore Quarry, showing Ceratosaurus and Allosaurus, two theropods with which Torvosaurus lived, fighting over the desiccated carcass of another theropod.

Bite marks on Allosaurus and Mymoorapelta remains were found among other bones with feeding traces in the Upper Jurassic Mygatt-Moore Quarry. Unlike the others, these have left striations that, when measured to determine denticle width, produced tooth and body size extrapolations greater than any known specimen of Allosaurus or Ceratosaurus, the two large predators known for osteological remains from the quarry. The extrapolations are instead coherent, either with an unusually large specimen of Allosaurus or a separate large taxon, like Torvosaurus or Saurophaganax, both of which are not known from the quarry. The result either increases the known diversity of the site based on ichnological evidence alone or represents powerful evidence of cannibalism in Allosaurus. Based on the position and nutrient value associated with the various skeletal elements with bite marks, it is predicted that while Mymoorapelta was either predated upon or scavenged shortly after death, Allosaurus was scavenged some time after death.[57]

References

  1. ^ a b c d Oliver W. M. Rauhut; Achim H. Schwermann; Tom R. Hübner; Klaus-Peter Lanser (2020). "The oldest record of the genus Torvosaurus (Theropoda: Megalosauridae) from the Callovian Ornatenton Formation of north-western Germany" (PDF). Geologie und Paläontologie in Westfalen. 93: 1–13.
  2. ^
    PMID 24598585
    .
  3. ^ a b c d Mateus, Octávio; Walen, Aart; Antunes, Miguel Telles (2006). "The large theropod fauna of the Lourinha Formation (Portugal) and its similarity to that of the Morrison Formation, with a description of a new species of Allosaurus". In Foster, John R.; Lucas, Spencer G. (eds.). Paleontology and Geology of the Upper Jurassic Morrison Formation. New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science Bulletin, 36. Albuquerque, New Mexico: New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science. pp. 123–129.
  4. ^
    Elmer Riggs". Historical Biology, volume 26, issue 6 (2014). Pages 775-784. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08912963.2013.853056?scroll=top&needAccess=true&journalCode=ghbi20
    .
  5. ^ Janensch, W. (1920). "Ueber Elaphrosaurus bambergi und die Megalosaurier aus den Tendaguru Schichten Deutsch-Ostafrikas". Sitzungsberichte der Gesellschaft Naturforschender Freunde zu Berlin: 225–235.
  6. ^
    S2CID 213672502
    .
  7. ^ "Torvosaurus: The Grizzly Bear of the Jurassic". Dinosaurs and Barbarians. August 8, 2015. Retrieved March 22, 2021.
  8. .
  9. ^ Tacuarembó Formation at Fossilworks.org
  10. ^ a b c d e P. M. Galton and J. A. Jensen. 1979. A new large theropod dinosaur from the Upper Jurassic of Colorado. Brigham Young University Geology Studies 26(1):1–12
  11. .
  12. ^ a b Jensen, J.A., 1985, "Uncompahgre dinosaur fauna: A preliminary report", Great Basin Naturalist, 45: 710–720
  13. ^ a b c d e f g Britt, B., 1991, "Theropods of Dry Mesa Quarry (Morrison Formation, Late Jurassic), Colorado, with emphasis on the osteology of Torvosaurus tanneri", Brigham Young University Geology Studies 37: 1–72
  14. ^ Bakker, R.T., Siegwarth, J., Kralis, D. & Filla, J., 1992, "Edmarka rex, a new, gigantic theropod dinosaur from the middle Morrison Formation, Late Jurassic of the Como Bluff outcrop region", Hunteria, 2(9): 1–24
  15. ^ a b c d e f Carrano, M. T.; Benson, R. B. J.; Sampson, S. D. (2012). "The phylogeny of Tetanurae (Dinosauria: Theropoda)". Journal of Systematic Palaeontology 10 (2): 211–300. doi:10.1080/14772019.2011.630927
  16. ^ .
  17. ^ Redman, P.D., 1995, Paleo Horizons, Winter Issue
  18. ^ Siegwarth, J., Linbeck, R., Bakker, R. and Southwell, B. (1996). Giant carnivorous dinosaurs of the family Megalosauridae. Hunteria 3:1–77.
  19. ^ a b Dalman, S. G. (2014). "New data on small theropod dinosaurs from the Upper Jurassic Morrison Formation of Como Bluff, Wyoming, USA" (PDF). Volumina Jurassica. 7 (2): 181–196.
  20. ^ a b "Torvosaurus – King of the Real Jurassic World Unearthed". FossilEra. Retrieved March 21, 2021.
  21. ^ "Museum of Natural History & Science (MNHS)". Cincinnati Museum Center. Retrieved March 21, 2021.
  22. ^ Mateus, O., & Antunes, M. T. (2000). Torvosaurus sp.(Dinosauria: Theropoda) in the late Jurassic of Portugal. In I Congresso Ibérico de Paleontologia/XVI Jornadas de la Sociedad Española de Paleontología (pp. 115–117)
  23. ^
    S2CID 85354215
    .
  24. ^ .
  25. .
  26. .
  27. ^ .
  28. ^ Holtz, Thomas R. (2012). "Dinosaurs: The Most Complete, Up-to-date Encyclopedia for Dinosaur Lovers of All Ages" (PDF).
  29. ^ Siegwarth, J., Linbeck, R., Bakker, R. and Southwell, B., 1996, "Giant carnivorous dinosaurs of the family Megalosauridae", Hunteria 3: 1–77
  30. .
  31. .
  32. .
  33. ^ R. E. Molnar, S. M. Kurzanov, and Z. Dong. 1990. "Carnosauria". In: D. B. Weishampel, H. Osmólska, and P. Dodson (eds.), The Dinosauria. University of California Press, Berkeley
  34. ^ O. W. M. Rauhut. 2003. The interrelationships and evolution of basal theropod dinosaurs. Special Papers in Palaeontology 69:1–213
  35. ^ T.R. Holtz, 1994, "The phylogenetic position of the Tyrannosauridae: implications for theropod systematics", Journal of Paleontology 68(5): 1100–1117
  36. ^ P.C. Sereno, J.A. Wilson, H.C.E. Larsson, D.B. Dutheil, and H.-D. Sues, 1994, "Early Cretaceous dinosaurs from the Sahara", Science 266(5183): 267–271
  37. ^ P.C. Sereno, 1998, "A rationale for phylogenetic definitions, with application to the higher-level taxonomy of Dinosauria", Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Abhandlungen 210(1): 41–83
  38. ^ Carrano, Benson and Sampson, 2012. The phylogeny of Tetanurae (Dinosauria: Theropoda). Journal of Systematic Palaeontology. 10(2), 211–300
  39. ^ Rauhut, 2000. The interrelationships and evolution of basal theropods (Dinosauria, Saurischia). Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. Bristol [U.K.], 1–440.
  40. ^ Long, J. A. & McNamara, K. J. Heterochrony: The key to dinosaur evolution. in The Dinofest International (Wolberg, D.L., Stump, E. & Rosenberg, G. D., eds.) 113–123 ( Acad. Nat. Sci. Phil. , 1997).
  41. ^ Balanoff, A. M., Norell, M. A., Grellet-Tinner, G. & Lewin, M. R. Digital preparation of a probable neoceratopsian preserved within an egg, with comments on microstructural anatomy of ornithischian eggshells. Naturwissenschaften 95 , 493–500 (2008).
  42. ^ Varricchio, D. J. et al., 2008. Avian paternal care had dinosaur origin. Science 322 , 1826– 1828.
  43. PMID 23722524
    .
  44. ^ "A rare find: Abandoned dinosaur nests with eggshells". NBC News. August 5, 2013.
  45. ^ Jensen, J. A. and Ostrom, J. H. (1977). A second Jurassic pterosaur from North America. Journal of Paleontology 51(4):867–870
  46. ^ Richmond, D.R. and Morris, T.H., 1999, Stratigraphy and cataclysmic deposition of the Dry Mesa Dinosaur Quarry, Mesa County, Colorado, in Carpenter, K., Kirkland, J., and Chure, D., eds., The Upper Jurassic Morrison Formation: An Interdisciplinary Study, Modern Geology v. 22, no. 1-4, pp. 121–143.
  47. ^ a b Chure, Daniel J.; Litwin, Ron; Hasiotis, Stephen T.; Evanoff, Emmett; Carpenter, Kenneth (2006). "The fauna and flora of the Morrison Formation: 2006". In Foster, John R.; Lucas, Spencer G. (eds.). Paleontology and Geology of the Upper Jurassic Morrison Formation. New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science Bulletin, 36. Albuquerque, New Mexico: New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science. pp. 233–248.
  48. ^ OCTÁVIO MATEUS LATE JURASSIC DINOSAURS FROM THE MORRISON FORMATION (USA), THE LOURINHÃ AND ALCOBAÇA FORMATIONS (PORTUGAL), AND THE TENDAGURU BEDS (TANZANIA): A COMPARISON Foster, J.R. and Lucas, S. G. R.M., eds., 2006, Paleontology and Geology of the Upper Jurassic Morrison Formation. New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science Bulletin 36.
  49. . Retrieved April 2, 2019.
  50. .
  51. .
  52. .
  53. .
  54. .
  55. ^ Nash, Duane (August 10, 2015). "Antediluvian Salad: Allosaurus - More of a Vulture Than a Falcon". Antediluvian Salad. Retrieved April 24, 2021.
  56. ISSN 0871-5424
    .
  57. .

External links