Transcranial magnetic stimulation

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Transcranial magnetic stimulation
Transcranial magnetic stimulation
(schematic diagram)
SpecialtyPsychiatry, neurology
MeSHD050781

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a noninvasive form of

magnetic coil connected to the scalp. The stimulator generates a changing electric current within the coil which creates a varying magnetic field, inducing a current within a region in the brain itself.[1]: 3 [2]

TMS has shown diagnostic and therapeutic potential in the central nervous system with a wide variety of disease states in neurology and mental health, with research still evolving.[3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]

Adverse effects of TMS appear rare and include

defibrillators.[12]

Medical uses

A magnetic coil is positioned on the patient's head.[13]

TMS does not require surgery or electrode implantation.

Its use can be diagnostic and/or therapeutic. Effects vary based on frequency and intensity of the magnetic pulses as well as the length of treatment, which dictates the total number of pulses given.[14] TMS treatments are approved by the FDA in the US and by NICE in the UK for the treatment of depression and are predominantly provided by private clinics. TMS stimulates cortical tissue without the pain sensations produced in transcranial electrical stimulation.[15]

Diagnosis

TMS can be used clinically to measure activity and function of specific brain circuits in humans, most commonly with single or paired magnetic pulses.

amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, and multiple sclerosis.[19]

Treatment

Repetitive high frequency TMS (rTMS) has been investigated as a possible treatment option with various degrees of success in conditions including[19][20]

Adverse effects

Although TMS is generally regarded as safe, risks are increased for therapeutic rTMS compared to single or paired diagnostic TMS.[21] Adverse effects generally increase with higher frequency stimulation.[12]

The greatest immediate risk from TMS is

Seizures have been reported, but are rare.[12][22][23] Other adverse effects include short term discomfort, pain, brief episodes of hypomania, cognitive change, hearing loss, impaired working memory, and the induction of electrical currents in implanted devices such as cardiac pacemakers.[12]

Procedure

During the procedure, a magnetic coil is positioned at the head of the person receiving the treatment using anatomical landmarks on the skull, in particular the inion and nasion.[13] The coil is then connected to a pulse generator, or stimulator, that delivers electric current to the coil.[2]

Physics

TMS – butterfly coils

TMS uses

skull.[24][25] A plastic-enclosed coil of wire is held next to the skull and when activated, produces a varying magnetic field oriented orthogonally to the plane of the coil. The changing magnetic field then induces an electric current in the brain that activates nearby nerve cells in a manner similar to a current applied superficially at the cortical surface.[26]

The magnetic field is about the same strength as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and the pulse generally reaches no more than 5 centimeters into the brain unless using a modified coil and technique for deeper stimulation.[25]

Transcranial magnetic stimulation is achieved by quickly discharging current from a large

magnetic fields between 2 and 3 teslas in strength.[27] Directing the magnetic field pulse at a targeted area in the brain causes a localized electrical current which can then either depolarize or hyperpolarize
neurons at that site. The induced electric field inside the brain tissue causes a change in transmembrane potentials resulting in depolarization or hyperpolarization of neurons, causing them to be more or less excitable, respectively.[27]

TMS usually stimulates to a depth from 2 to 4 cm below the surface, depending on the coil and intensity used. Consequently, only superficial brain areas can be affected.

conduction throughout its tissues.[29]

Frequency and duration

The effects of TMS can be divided based on frequency, duration and intensity (amplitude) of stimulation:[30]

Coil types

Most devices use a coil shaped like a figure-eight to deliver a shallow magnetic field that affects more superficial neurons in the brain.[9] Differences in magnetic coil design are considered when comparing results, with important elements including the type of material, geometry and specific characteristics of the associated magnetic pulse.

The core material may be either a magnetically inert substrate ('air core'), or a solid,

ferromagnetically active material ('solid core'). Solid cores result in more efficient transfer of electrical energy to a magnetic field and reduce energy loss to heat, and so can be operated with the higher volume of therapy protocols without interruption due to overheating. Varying the geometric shape of the coil itself can cause variations in focality, shape, and depth of penetration. Differences in coil material and its power supply also affect magnetic pulse width and duration.[35]

A number of different types of coils exist, each of which produce different magnetic fields. The round coil is the original used in TMS. Later, the figure-eight (butterfly) coil was developed to provide a more focal pattern of activation in the brain, and the four-leaf coil for focal stimulation of peripheral nerves. The double-cone coil conforms more to the shape of the head.[36] The Hesed (H-core), circular crown and double cone coils allow more widespread activation and a deeper magnetic penetration. They are supposed to impact deeper areas in the motor cortex and cerebellum controlling the legs and pelvic floor, for example, though the increased depth comes at the cost of a less focused magnetic pulse.[12]

History

electrical current had a corresponding magnetic field, and that changing one could induce its counterpart.[38]

Work to directly stimulate the human brain with electricity started in the late 1800s, and by the 1930s the Italian physicians

mental illness, and ultimately overused, as it began to be seen as a panacea. This led to a backlash in the 1970s.[37]

In 1980 Merton and Morton successfully used transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) to stimulate the motor cortex. However, this process was very uncomfortable, and subsequently Anthony T. Barker began to search for an alternative to TES.[39] He began exploring the use of magnetic fields to alter electrical signaling within the brain, and the first stable TMS devices were developed in 1985.[37][38] They were originally intended as diagnostic and research devices, with evaluation of their therapeutic potential being a later development.[37][38] The United States' FDA first approved TMS devices in October 2008.[37]

Research

TMS has shown potential therapeutic effect on

With Parkinson's disease, early results suggest that low frequency stimulation may have an effect on medication associated dyskinesia, and that high frequency stimulation improves motor function.[46][47] The most effective treatment protocols appear to involve high frequency stimulation of the motor cortex, particularly on the dominant side,[48] but with more variable results for treatment of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex.[49] It is less effective than electroconvulsive therapy for motor symptoms, though both appear to have utility.[50][51][52] Cerebellar stimulation has also shown potential for the treatment of levodopa associated dyskinesia.[53]

In

autism,[57] substance abuse,[4] addiction,[4][58][59] and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).[4] For treatment-resistant major depressive disorder, high-frequency (HF) rTMS of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) appears effective and low-frequency (LF) rTMS of the right DLPFC has probable efficacy.[4][5][7][8][9] Research on the efficacy of rTMS in non-treatment-resistant depression is limited.[60]

TMS can also be used to map functional connectivity between the cerebellum and other areas of the brain.[61]

A study on alternative Alzheimer's treatments at the Wahrendorff Clinic in Germany in 2021[62] reported that 84% of participants in the study have experienced positive effects after using the treatment.

Under the supervision of Professor Marc Ziegenbein, a psychiatry and psychotherapy specialist, the study of 77 subjects with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease received frequent transcranial magnetic stimulation applications and observed over a period of time.

Improvements were mainly found in the areas of orientation in the environment, concentration, general well-being and satisfaction.

Study blinding

Mimicking the physical discomfort of TMS with

subjective measures of improvement.[12] Placebo responses in trials of rTMS in major depression are negatively associated with refractoriness to treatment.[66]

A 2011 review found that most studies did not report

unblinding. In the minority that did, participants in real and sham rTMS groups were not significantly different in their ability to correctly guess their therapy, though there was a trend for participants in the real group to more often guess correctly.[67]

Animal model limitations

TMS research in animal studies is limited due to its early US Food and Drug Administration approval for treatment-resistant depression, limiting development of animal specific magnetic coils.[68]

Treatments for the general public

Regulatory approvals

Neurosurgery planning

Nexstim obtained United States Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act§Section 510(k) clearance for the assessment of the primary motor cortex for pre-procedural planning in December 2009[69] and for neurosurgical planning in June 2011.[70]

Depression

The National Institutes of Health estimates depression medications work for 60 percent to 70 percent of people who take them.[71][72] TMS is approved as a Class II medical device under the "de novo pathway".[73][74] In addition, the World Health Organization reports that the number of people living with depression has increased nearly 20 percent since 2005.[75] In a 2012 study, TMS was found to improve depression significantly in 58 percent of patients and provide complete remission of symptoms in 37 percent of patients.[76] In 2002, Cochrane Library reviewed randomized controlled trials using TMS to treat depression. The review did not find a difference between rTMS and sham TMS, except for a period 2 weeks after treatment.[77] In 2018, Cochrane Library stated a plan to contact authors about updating the review of rTMS for depression.[78]

Obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD)

In August 2018, the US Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) authorized the use of TMS developed by the Israeli company Brainsway in the treatment of obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD).[79]

In 2020, US FDA authorized the use of TMS developed by the U.S. company MagVenture Inc. in the treatment of OCD.[80]

In 2023, US FDA authorized the use of TMS developed by the U.S. company Neuronetics Inc. in the treatment of OCD.[81]

Other neurological areas

In the European Economic Area, various versions of Deep TMS H-coils have CE marking for Alzheimer's disease,[82]

autism,[82]
bipolar disorder,[83] epilepsy,[84] chronic pain,[83] major depressive disorder,[83] Parkinson's disease,[48][85] post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD),[83][86] schizophrenia (negative symptoms)[83] and to aid smoking cessation.[82] One review found tentative benefit for cognitive enhancement in healthy people.[87]

Coverage by health services and insurers

United Kingdom

The United Kingdom's

hospital trusts) make decisions about funding after considering the clinical effectiveness of the procedure and whether the procedure represents value for money for the NHS.[88]

NICE evaluated TMS for severe depression (IPG 242) in 2007, and subsequently considered TMS for reassessment in January 2011 but did not change its evaluation.[89] The Institute found that TMS is safe, but there is insufficient evidence for its efficacy.[89]

In January 2014, NICE reported the results of an evaluation of TMS for treating and preventing migraine (IPG 477). NICE found that short-term TMS is safe but there is insufficient evidence to evaluate safety for long-term and frequent uses. It found that evidence on the efficacy of TMS for the treatment of migraine is limited in quantity, that evidence for the prevention of migraine is limited in both quality and quantity.[90]

Subsequently, in 2015, NICE approved the use of TMS for the treatment of depression in the UK and IPG542 replaced IPG242.[91] NICE said "The evidence on repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for depression shows no major safety concerns. The evidence on its efficacy in the short-term is adequate, although the clinical response is variable. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for depression may be used with normal arrangements for clinical governance and audit."

United States: commercial health insurance

In 2013, several commercial health insurance plans in the United States, including

Regence.[97][98][99]

United States: Medicare

Policies for Medicare coverage vary among local jurisdictions within the Medicare system,[100] and Medicare coverage for TMS has varied among jurisdictions and with time. For example:

  • In early 2012 in New England, Medicare covered TMS for the first time in the United States.[101][102][103][104] However, that jurisdiction later decided to end coverage after October, 2013.[105]
  • In August 2012, the jurisdiction covering Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Colorado, Texas, Oklahoma, and New Mexico determined that there was insufficient evidence to cover the treatment,[106] but the same jurisdiction subsequently determined that Medicare would cover TMS for the treatment of depression after December 2013.[107]
  • Subsequently,[when?] some other Medicare jurisdictions added Medicare coverage for depression.[citation needed]

See also

References

  1. ^ NICE. January 2014 Transcranial magnetic stimulation for treating and preventing migraine
  2. ^ a b Michael Craig Miller for Harvard Health Publications. July 26, 2012 Magnetic stimulation: a new approach to treating depression?
  3. ^
    PMID 22349304
    .
  4. ^ .
  5. ^ .
  6. .
  7. ^ .
  8. ^ a b Perera, Tarique; George, Mark; Grammer, Geoffrey; Janicak, Philip; Pascual-Leone, Alvaro; Wirecki, Theodore (April 27, 2015). TMS Therapy For Major Depressive Disorder: Evidence Review and Treatment Recommendations for Clinical Practice (PDF) (Report).
  9. ^
    S2CID 29053871
    .
  10. ^ .
  11. ^ "Pupil response may shed light on who responds best to transcranial magnetic stimulation for depression". www.uclahealth.org. Retrieved 2024-01-06.
  12. ^
    S2CID 225049093
    .
  13. ^ .
  14. .
  15. . Retrieved 29 March 2024.
  16. .
  17. ^ .
  18. ^ .
  19. ^ .
  20. .
  21. .
  22. .
  23. .
  24. .
  25. ^ a b "Brain Stimulation Therapies". NIMH.
  26. .
  27. ^ a b V. Walsh and A. Pascual-Leone, "Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: A Neurochronometrics of Mind." Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 2003.
  28. .
  29. ^ See:
    1. Zangen A, Roth Y, Voller B, Hallett M (April 2005). "Transcranial magnetic stimulation of deep brain regions: evidence for efficacy of the H-coil". Clinical Neurophysiology. 116 (4): 775–779.
      S2CID 25101101
      .
    2. Huang YZ, Sommer M, Thickbroom G, Hamada M, Pascual-Leonne A, Paulus W, et al. (January 2009). "Consensus: New methodologies for brain stimulation". Brain Stimulation. 2 (1): 2–13.
      PMID 20633398
      .
  30. .
  31. .
  32. .
  33. .
  34. ^ Baur D, Galevska D, Hussain S, Cohen LG, Ziemann U, Zrenner C. Induction of LTD-like corticospinal plasticity by low-frequency rTMS depends on pre-stimulus phase of sensorimotor μ-rhythm. Brain Stimul. 2020 Nov-Dec;13(6):1580-1587. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2020.09.005. Epub 2020 Sep 17. PMID 32949780; PMCID: PMC7710977.
  35. .
  36. .
  37. ^ .
  38. ^ .
  39. .
  40. .
  41. .
  42. .
  43. .
  44. .
  45. .
  46. .
  47. .
  48. ^ .
  49. .
  50. .
  51. .
  52. .
  53. .
  54. .
  55. .
  56. .
  57. .
  58. PMID 22846200. Archived from the original
    on 2014-02-26.
  59. .
  60. .
  61. .
  62. ^ "Alternative Alzheimer's Treatments Offering Hope - 84% of the subjects surveyed rated their psychological well-being after the TPS treatment as medium to good". Hitoshin. 11 April 2023.
  63. PMID 25767458
    .
  64. .
  65. .
  66. .
  67. .
  68. .
  69. ^ "FDA clears Nexstim´s Navigated Brain Stimulation for non-invasive cortical mapping prior to neurosurgery – Archive – Press Releases". nexstim.com.
  70. ^ "Nexstim Announces FDA Clearance for NexSpeech® – Enabling Noninvasive Speech Mapping Prior to Neurosurgery". businesswire.com. 11 June 2012.
  71. ^ Information about Mental Illness and the Brain. National Institutes of Health (US). 2007.
  72. ^ In addition, the World Health Organization reports that the number of people living with depression has increased nearly 20 percent since 2005.
  73. ^ Michael Drues, for Med Device Online. 5 February 2014 Secrets Of The De Novo Pathway, Part 1: Why Aren't More Device Makers Using It?
  74. PMID 26177612
    .
  75. ^ ""Depression: let's talk" says WHO, as depression tops list of causes of ill health". www.who.int. Retrieved 2022-08-10.
  76. S2CID 22968810
    .
  77. . Retrieved 11 December 2023.
  78. .
  79. ^ "FDA permits marketing of transcranial magnetic stimulation for treatment of obsessive compulsive disorder". Food and Drug Administration. 2020-02-20.
  80. ^ "MagVenture receives FDA clearance for OCD | Clinical TMS Society". www.clinicaltmssociety.org. Retrieved 2023-10-11.
  81. ^ "FDA clears OCD motor threshold cap for transcranial magnetic stimulation system". www.healio.com. Retrieved 2023-10-11.
  82. ^ a b c "Brainsway reports positive Deep TMS system trial data for OCD". Medical Device Network. Medicaldevice-network. September 6, 2013. Retrieved December 16, 2013.
  83. ^ a b c d e "Brainsway's Deep TMS EU Cleared for Neuropathic Chronic Pain". medGadget. July 3, 2012. Retrieved December 16, 2013.
  84. PMID 27114902
    .
  85. .
  86. .
  87. .
  88. ^ NICE About NICE: What we do
  89. ^ a b "Transcranial magnetic stimulation for severe depression (IPG242)". London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. 2011-03-04.
  90. ^ "Transcranial magnetic stimulation for treating and preventing migraine". London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. January 2014.
  91. ^ "Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for depression". National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. 16 December 2015. Retrieved 6 December 2019.
  92. ^ "Medical Policy: Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Depression and Other Neuropsychiatric Disorders". Policy No. BEH.00002. Anthem, Inc. 2013-04-16. Archived from the original on 2013-07-29. Retrieved 2013-12-11.
  93. ^ Health Net (March 2012). "National Medical Policy: Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation" (PDF). Policy Number NMP 508. Health Net. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2012-10-11. Retrieved 2012-09-05.
  94. ^ "Medical Policy Manual" (PDF). Section IV.67. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Nebraska. 2011-05-18. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2012-10-28.
  95. ^ "Medical Coverage Policy: Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Treatment of Depression and Other Psychiatric/Neurologic Disorders" (PDF). Blue Cross Blue Shield of Rhode Island. 2012-05-15. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2013-05-26. Retrieved 2012-09-05.
  96. UnitedHealthcare (2013-12-01). "Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation" (PDF). UnitedHealthCare. p. 2. Archived from the original
    (PDF) on 2013-05-20. Retrieved 2013-12-11.
  97. ^ Aetna (2013-10-11). "Clinical Policy Bulletin: Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Cranial Electrical Stimulation". Number 0469. Aetna. Archived from the original on 2013-10-22. Retrieved 2013-12-11.
  98. ^ Cigna (2013-01-15). "Cigna Medical Coverage Policy: Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation" (PDF). Coverage Policy Number 0383. Cigna. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2017-02-04. Retrieved 2013-12-11.
  99. (PDF) on 2014-12-09. Retrieved 2013-12-11.
  100. on 2014-02-14. Retrieved 2014-02-14.
  101. on 2014-02-17. Retrieved 2014-02-17.
  102. ^ "Important Treatment Option for Depression Receives Medicare Coverage". Press Release. PBN.com: Providence Business News. 2012-03-30. Archived from the original on 2013-04-05. Retrieved 2012-10-11.
  103. ^ The Institute for Clinical and Economic Review (June 2012). "Coverage Policy Analysis: Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS)" (PDF). The New England Comparative Effectiveness Public Advisory Council (CEPAC). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2013-12-13. Retrieved 2013-12-11.
  104. ^ "Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Cites Influence of New England Comparative Effectiveness Public Advisory Council (CEPAC)". Berlin, Vermont: Central Vermont Medical Center. 2012-02-06. Archived from the original on 2012-03-25. Retrieved 2012-10-12.
  105. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
    . Retrieved 2014-02-17.
  106. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
    . Retrieved 2014-02-17.
  107. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
    . Retrieved 2014-02-17.