Tricholomataceae

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Tricholomataceae
Temporal range: Turonian–recent [1]
Tricholoma flavovirens, near Wellfleet, Massachusetts, USA
Tricholoma flavovirens, near Wellfleet, Massachusetts
, USA
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Domain: Eukaryota
Kingdom: Fungi
Division: Basidiomycota
Class: Agaricomycetes
Order: Agaricales
Suborder: Tricholomatineae
Family: Tricholomataceae
R.Heim ex Pouzar (1983)
Type genus
Tricholoma
(Fr.) Staude (1857)
Genera

The Tricholomataceae are a large

.

The name derives from the

Greek trichos (τριχος) meaning hair and loma (λωμα) meaning fringe or border, although not all members display this feature.[2]

The name "Tricholomataceae" is seen as having validity in describing Tricholoma and other genera that form part of a monophyletic family including Tricholoma. To that end, the International Botanical Congress has voted on two occasions (1988 and 2006) to conserve the name "Tricholomataceae" against competing names.[3][4] This decision does not invalidate the use of segregate families from the Tricholomataceae, but simply validates the continued use of Tricholomataceae.[5]

Taxonomy

molecular phylogenetics. As of 2006, validly published families segregated from the Tricholomataceae include the Hydnangiaceae, Lyophyllaceae, Marasmiaceae, Mycenaceae, Omphalotaceae, Physalacriaceae, and Pleurotaceae
.

In 2014 a study recovered seven

polyphyletic. This study suggests that the genus is distributed in four groups within the Trichlomatoid clade; Porpoloma s.str, Corneriella, Pseudotricholoma. and Pogonoloma.[6]

In 2015, a phylogenomic study improved the resolution of Agaricales. A new suborder

Clitocybe gibba. It roughly matches the "Tricholomatoid clade" of previous studies.[9]

Examples

Some species of fungus-growing ants in the genus Apterostigma cultivate species of Tricholomataceae.[10][11]

The extinct genus Archaeomarasmius, described from Turonian-age New Jersey amber,[1] is one of four known genera of Agaricales in the fossil record.[12]

See also

References

  1. ^
    JSTOR 2446289
    .
  2. .
  3. ^ Redhead SA. (2003). (1571) Proposal to conserve the name Tricholomataceae nom. cons. against two additional names, Mycenaceae and Hygrophoraceae (Fungi). Taxon 52(1):135–136.
  4. ^ McNeill J, Redhead SA, Wiersema JH. (2006). Report of the General Committee: 9. Taxon 55(3):795–800.
  5. ^ (Young, 2002)[full citation needed]
  6. ^ a b Sánchez-García M, Matheny PB, Palfner G, Lodge DG. (2014) Deconstructing the Tricholomataceae (Agaricales) and introduction of the new genera Albomagister, Corneriella, Pogonoloma and Pseudotricholoma. Taxon 63(5): 993–1007.
  7. ^ Matheny PB, Curtis JM, Hofstetter V, Aime MC, Moncalvo JM, Ge ZW, Slot JC, Ammirati JF, Baroni TJ, Bougher NL, Hughes KW, Lodge DJ, Kerrigan RW, Seidl MT, Aanen D, DeNitis M, Daniel GM, Desjardin,D.E., Kropp, B.R., Norvell, L.L., Parker, A., Vellinga EC, Vilgalys R. & Hibbet DS (2006). Major clades of Agaricales: A multilocus phylogenetic overview. Mycologia 98: 982–995. https://dx.doi.org/10.3852/mycologia.98.6.982
  8. ^ Binder M, Larsson KH, Matheny PB & Hibbett DS (2010). Amylocorticiales ord. nov. and Jaapiales ord. nov.: Early diverging clades of Agaricomycetidae dominated by corticioid forms. Mycologia 102: 865–880. https://dx.doi.org/10.3852/09-288
  9. .
  10. .
  11. .
  12. . (subscription required)