Trung sisters' rebellion

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Trung sisters' rebellion
Part of the
Han Empire (today Northern Vietnam, Central Vietnam, Southern Guangxi
)
Result Han victory
Belligerents Han dynasty
Lac Viet
Commanders and leaders Su Ding (Governor)
Ma Yuan[a]
Liu Long
Trưng Nhị Executed
Đô Dương Surrendered
Chu Bá Executed[2]
Strength 20,000 soldiers
2,000
tower-ships[1] unknownCasualties and losses 40–50% of Han soldiers (mostly from epidemic)[3] Trưng sisters' forces:
• several tens to hundreds killed;
• over 20,000 surrendered[4][5]
Đô Dương's forces:
• over 5,000 (both killed and surrendered);[4]
• over 300 exiled[6]
Chu Bá's forces:
• several tens to hundreds executed[2]
Timeline flag Vietnam portal

The Trưng sisters' rebellion was an armed civil uprising in the southern provinces (today

Luoyue rebellion of the Trưng sisters. In 43 AD, the Han army fully suppressed the uprising and regained complete control. The Trưng sisters were captured and beheaded by the Han forces,[7][8] although Vietnamese chronicles of the defeat records that the two sisters, having lost to Han forces, decided to commit suicide by jumping down the Hát Giang river, so as not to surrender to the Han.[9][10][11]

Background

Thanh Hoa, excavated by Swedish archaeologist Olov Janse in 1934. Guimet Museum, Paris, France
.

One prominent group of ancient people in Northern Vietnam (

Eastern Han, while two Han governors of Jiaozhi Xi Guang (?-30 AD) and Ren Yan, with support from Chinese scholar-immigrants, conducted the first "sinicization" on the local tribes by introducing Chinese-style marriage, opening the first Chinese schools, and introducing Chinese philosophies, therefore provoking cultural conflict.[15] American philologist Stephen O'Harrow indicates that the introduction of Chinese-style marriage customs might have come in the interest of transferring land rights to Chinese immigrants in the area, replacing the matrilineal tradition of the area.[16]

The

Hou Hanshu, Thi Sách was "of a fierce temperament".[20] Trưng Trắc, who was likewise described as "possessing mettle and courage",[21] fearlessly stirred her husband to action. As a result, Su Ding attempted to restrain Thi Sách with laws, literally beheading him without trial.[22] Trưng Trắc became the central figure in mobilizing the Lac lords against the Chinese.[23]

Revolt

In March

Lac Viet people to rise up in rebellion against the Han.[7][8][24] The Hou Han Shu recorded that Trưng Trắc launched the rebellion in avenge the killing of her dissent husband.[18][verification needed] Other sources indicate that Trưng Trắc's movement towards rebellion was influenced by the loss of land intended for her inheritance due to the replacement of traditional matrilineal customs.[16] It began at the Red River Delta, but soon spread to other Lac tribes and non-Han people from an area stretching from Hepu to Rinan.[17] Chinese settlements were overrun, and Su Ting fled.[23] The uprising gained the control of about sixty-five towns and settlements.[8] Trưng Trắc was proclaimed as the queen.[7] Even though she gained control over the countryside, she was not able to capture major fortified towns.[7]

Han counterattack

Han dynasty army represents as terracotta miniatures, from the site of Yangjiawan, Xianyang, Shaanxi province, circa 200 BCE–220 CE.

The Han government (situated in Luoyang) responded rather slowly to the emerging situation.[7] In May or June of 41 AD, Emperor Guangwu gave the orders to initiate a military campaign. The strategic importance of Jiaozhi is underscored by the fact that the Han sent their most trusted generals, Ma Yuan and Duan Zhi to suppress the rebellion.[25] Ma Yuan was given the title Fubo Jiangjun (伏波將軍; General who Calms the Waves).[7] He would later go down in Chinese history as a great official who brought Han civilization to the barbarians.[25]

Ma Yuan and his staff began mobilizing a Han army in southern China.[7] It consisted 20,000 regulars and 12,000 regional auxiliaries.[8][26] From Guangdong, Ma Yuan dispatched a fleet of supply ships along the coast.[7]

In the spring of 42, the imperial army reached high ground at Lãng Bạc, in the Tiên Du mountains of what is now

Tản Viên
, where her ancestral estates were located; and defeated them several times. Increasingly isolated and cut off from supplies, the two women were unable to sustain their last stand and the Chinese captured both sisters in early 43.[28] Trắc's husband, Thi Sách, escaped to Mê Linh, ran to a place called Jinxijiu and was not captured until three years later.[27] The rebellion was brought under control by April or May.[7] Ma Yuan decapitated Trưng Trắc and Trưng Nhị,[7][8] and sent their heads to the Han court at Luoyang.[27] By the end of 43 AD, the Han army had taken full control over the region by defeating the last pockets of resistance.[7] Yuan reported his victories, and added: “Since I came to Jiaozhi, the current troop has been the most magnificent."[27]

Aftermath

Book of Later Han, in 43 CE after putting down the Trung sisters' revolt, Ma Yuan confiscated Luoyue drums and melted them together into a bronze horse to present to the Emperor of China.[7]
A Chinese bronze ewer with intricate Dongsonian elephant-headed spout, later Han period (2nd-3rd century CE), Northern Vietnam. Metropolitan Museum of Art.

In their reconquest of Jiaozhi and Jiuzhen, Han forces also appear to have massacred most of the Lạc Việt aristocracy, beheading five to ten thousand people and deporting several hundred families to China.[29] After the Trưng sisters were dead, Ma Yuan spent most of the year 43 building up Han administration in the Red River Delta and preparing the local society for direct Han rule.

Cổ Loa.[31] Later, Chinese historians writing of Ma Yuan's expedition referred to the Luo/Lạc as the "Luoyue" or simply as the "Yue".[32] "Yue" had become a category of Chinese perception designating myriad groups of non-Chinese peoples in the south. The Chinese considered the Lac to be a "Yue" people, and it was customary to attribute certain cliched cultural traits to the Lạc in order to identify them as "Yue".[33][34]

Demise of the Dongson culture and the rise of Li-Lao culture

A local Funanese imitation of aureus issued by Roman emperor Commodus, circa 180 CE, from Óc Eo, Mekong Delta, located 1,000 miles south of Han-controlled Jiaozhi (Northern Vietnam). Excavated by Louis Malleret in 1942. Legend: L(ucius) AEL(ius) AVREL(ius) COMMO(odus) AVG(ustus) P(ius) FEL(ix)

The Trung sisters' defeat in 43 AD also subsequently coincided with the end of Dong Son culture and Dong Son metallurgical drum tradition that had been flourished in Northern Vietnam for centuries,[35] as the Han tightened their grips over the region and culminated the civilizing progress that transforms and affects on non-Sinic people.[36] Local Red River Delta elites pledged themselves to Chinese cultural norms and Chinese hierarchy. Chinese techniques, religions, and taxation were forced upon or voluntarily embraced by indigenous tribes. The regions' demographics and history shifted.[36] Jiaozhou or the Red River Delta gradually became semi-integrated into Chinese empires through Han to Jin dynasty. No large-scale uprising occurred in the region for roughly 400 years.[37] The successful reconquest of Northern Vietnam also gave the Han dynasty secured gateways to access southern maritime trade routes and establish ties with various polities in Southeast Asia and beyond, and increasing relationships between China and the Indian Ocean world.[38] The Han records mention a distant Daqin (whether Rome or not) embassy came from the South and entered the Han empire through Rinan (Central Vietnam) in 166 AD.[39] Along with trade and knowledge, religions such as Buddhism, possibly spread to China via Northern Vietnam from southern sea, along with obvious inland Silk Road, during the second and third centuries.[40]

The decline of Dong Son culture in the

Li people in Hainan.[44] After the collapse of the Han dynasty in the early third century AD and China being in the state of turmoil for approximately 400 years, no Chinese dynasty was strong enough to exert its control and influence over this region until the powerful Tang dynasty, while numerous independent Dong chiefdoms represent the Li Lao drum culture's autonomy, created the voidness of imperial authorities in the regions that were inside the empire.[45] According to researcher Catherine Churchman in her 2016 book The People Between the Rivers: The Rise and Fall of a Bronze Drum Culture, 200–750 CE, due to Li-Lao culture's massive dominantly influences, instead of becoming more assimilated into China, the Red River Delta from 200 to 750 AD experienced a reverse effect on sinicization or "de-Sinifying effect", therefore the history of sinicization of the region should be reconsidered.[46]

Perception

Luoyue chief, 500 BCE-200 CE. Metropolitan Museum of Art
.

The Trưng sisters' rebellion marked a brilliant epoch for women in ancient southern China and reflected the importance of women in early Vietnamese society.[28] One reason for the defeat is the desertion by rebels because they did not believe they could win under a woman's leadership.[47] The fact that women were in charge was blamed as a reason for the defeat by historical Vietnamese texts. Vietnamese historians were ridiculing and mocking men for the fact that they did nothing while "mere girls", whom they viewed with revulsion, took up the banner of revolt-the Vietnamese poem which talked about the revolt of the Trung Sisters while the men did nothing was not intended to praise women nor view war as women's work as it has been wrongly interpreted.[48][49][50][51][52][53]

The Vietnamese proverb Giặc đến nhà, đàn bà cũng đánh ("when the enemy is at the gate, even the women go out fighting") has been recited as evidence of Lạc women's respected status.[54] The quote means that fighting in war is inappropriate for women and its only when the situation is so desperate that the war has spread to their home then women should enter the war.[55][56][57]

See also

Notes

  1. ^ Tower-ship General Duan Zhi, was also dispatched but died of illness before Han forces engaged Trưng sisters' forces; Ma Yuan took command of Duan Zhi's troops[1]
  2. HHS mentions nothing about his whereabouts or activities during or after the rebellion. ĐVSKTT
    claims that he had been executed by Han grand-administrator Su Ding before the rebellion.

Citation

  1. ^ a b Hou Hanshuvol. 24 "Account of Ma Yuan"
  2. ^ a b Jiaozhou Waiyu Ji, as quoted in Li Daoyuan's Shuijing zhu vol. 37
  3. ^ Hou Hanshu, vol. 24 "Account of Ma Yuan" quote: "軍吏經瘴疫死者十四五。"
  4. ^ a b Hou Hanshu, vol. 24 "Account of Ma Yuan"
  5. ^ Hou Hanshu, vol. 22 "Account of Liu Long"
  6. ^ Hou Hanshu, Vol. 86 "Account of the Southern Barbarians"
  7. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n Bielestein (1986), p. 271.
  8. ^ a b c d e Yü (1986), p. 454.
  9. ^ "Đại Việt Sử Ký Toàn Thư (Complete History of Dai Viet)" (in Vietnamese). Retrieved 2024-02-16.
  10. ^ "Đại Việt Sử Ký Toàn Thư (Complete History of Dai Viet)" (in Vietnamese). Retrieved 2024-02-16.
  11. ^ Book 3: kỷ thuộc Tây Hán, kỷ Trưng Nữ Vương, kỷ thuộc Đông Hán, kỷ Sĩ Vương, book of History of Greater Vietnam (Đại Việt Sử Ký Toàn Thư)
  12. ^ Kiernan (2019), pp. 41–42.
  13. ^ Kiernan (2019), p. 28.
  14. ^ Kiernan (2019), pp. 63–64.
  15. ^ Kiernan (2019), pp. 76–77.
  16. ^
    JSTOR 42928006
    – via JSTOR.
  17. ^ a b Brindley (2015), p. 235.
  18. ^ a b Lai (2015), p. 253.
  19. ^ Scott (1918), p. 312.
  20. ^ Hou Hanshu, Vol. 86. text: "甚雄勇"
  21. ^ Jiaozhou Waiyu Ji, as quoted in Li Daoyuan's Shuijing zhu vol. 37. text: "側爲人有膽勇"
  22. ^ Scott (1918), p. 313.
  23. ^ a b Taylor (1983), p. 38.
  24. ^ Kiernan (2019), p. 78.
  25. ^ a b Brindley (2015), p. 236.
  26. ^ Kiernan (2019), p. 79.
  27. ^ a b c d Kiernan (2019), p. 80.
  28. ^ a b Lai (2015), p. 254.
  29. ^ a b Kiernan (2019), p. 81.
  30. ^ Taylor (1983), p. 45.
  31. ^ Kiernan (2019), p. 82.
  32. ^ Taylor (1983), p. 33.
  33. ^ Taylor (1983), pp. 42–43.
  34. ^ Brindley (2015), p. 31.
  35. ^ Korolkov 2021, p. 187.
  36. ^ a b Kiernan (2019), p. 84.
  37. ^ Churchman 2016, pp. 61–62.
  38. ^ Kiernan (2019), p. 85.
  39. ^ Kiernan (2019), p. 86.
  40. ^ Kiernan (2019), p. 92.
  41. ^ Korolkov 2021, p. 8.
  42. ^ Churchman 2016, p. 12.
  43. ^ Korolkov 2021, p. 192.
  44. ^ Churchman 2016, p. 9.
  45. ^ Churchman 2016, pp. 107, 113.
  46. ^ Churchman 2016, p. 204.
  47. ^ Taylor (1983), p. 41.
  48. ^ McKay et al. (2012), p. 134.
  49. ^ Gilbert, Marc Jason (2007). "When Heroism is Not Enough: Three Women Warriors of Vietnam, Their Historians and World History". World History Connected. 4 (3).
  50. ^ Taylor (1983), p. 334.
  51. ^ Dutton, Werner & Whitmore (2012), p. 80.
  52. ^ Hood (2019), p. 7.
  53. ^ Crossroads. Northern Illinois University, Center for Southeast Asian Studies. 1995. p. 35. "TRUNG SISTERS © Chi D. Nguyen". viettouch.com. Retrieved 17 June 2016. "State and Empire in Eurasia/North Africa" (PDF). Fortthomas.kyschools.us. Retrieved 2016-06-17. "Ways of the World" (PDF). Cartershistories.com. Retrieved 2016-06-17. "Strayer textbook ch03". slideshare.net. 30 September 2014. Retrieved 17 June 2016. "Bà Trưng quê ở châu Phong - web". viethoc.com. Retrieved 17 June 2016.
  54. ^ Nguyˆen, Van Ky. "Rethinking the Status of Vietnamese Women in Folklore and Oral History" (PDF). University of Michigan Press. pp. 87–107 (21 pages as PDF file).
  55. ^ Tai (2001), p. 1.
  56. ^ Tai (2001), p. 48.
  57. ^ Tai (2001), p. 159.

Bibliography