Type II supernova
A Type II supernova or SNII
Stars generate energy by the
When the compacted mass of the inert core exceeds the
There exist several categories of Type II supernova explosions, which are categorized based on the resulting
Formation
Stars far more massive than the sun evolve in complex ways. In the core of the star,
In stars of less than eight solar masses, the carbon produced by helium fusion does not fuse, and the star gradually cools to become a white dwarf.[4][5] If they accumulate more mass from another star, or some other source, they may become Type Ia supernovae. But a much larger star is massive enough to continue fusion beyond this point.
The cores of these massive stars directly create temperatures and pressures needed to cause the carbon in the core to begin to fuse when the star contracts at the end of the helium-burning stage. The core gradually becomes layered like an onion, as progressively heavier atomic nuclei build up at the center, with an outermost layer of hydrogen gas, surrounding a layer of hydrogen fusing into helium, surrounding a layer of helium fusing into carbon via the triple-alpha process, surrounding layers that fuse to progressively heavier elements. As a star this massive evolves, it undergoes repeated stages where fusion in the core stops, and the core collapses until the pressure and temperature are sufficient to begin the next stage of fusion, reigniting to halt collapse.[4][5]
Core-burning nuclear fusion stages for a 25-solar mass star Process Main fuel Main products 25 M☉ star[6] Temperature
(K)Density
(g/cm3)Duration hydrogen burning hydrogen helium 7×107 10 107 years triple-alpha process helium carbon, oxygen 2×108 2000 106 years carbon-burning process carbon Ne, Na, Mg, Al 8×108 106 1000 years neon-burning process neon O, Mg 1.6×109 107 3 years oxygen-burning process oxygen Si, S, Ar, Ca 1.8×109 107 0.3 years silicon-burning process silicon nickel (decays into iron) 2.5×109 108 5 days
Core collapse
The factor limiting this process is the amount of energy that is released through fusion, which is dependent on the
When the core's mass exceeds the
For Type II supernovae, the collapse is eventually halted by short-range repulsive neutron-neutron interactions, mediated by the
The core collapse phase is so dense and energetic that only neutrinos are able to escape. As the protons and electrons combine to form neutrons by means of electron capture, an electron neutrino is produced. In a typical Type II supernova, the newly formed neutron core has an initial temperature of about 100 billion kelvins, 104 times the temperature of the Sun's core. Much of this thermal energy must be shed for a stable neutron star to form, otherwise the neutrons would "boil away". This is accomplished by a further release of neutrinos.[14] These 'thermal' neutrinos form as neutrino-antineutrino pairs of all flavors, and total several times the number of electron-capture neutrinos.[15] The two neutrino production mechanisms convert the gravitational potential energy of the collapse into a ten-second neutrino burst, releasing about 1046 joules (100 foe).[16]
Through a process that is not clearly understood, about 1%, or 1044 joules (1 foe), of the energy released (in the form of
When the progenitor star is below about 20 M☉ – depending on the strength of the explosion and the amount of material that falls back – the degenerate remnant of a core collapse is a neutron star.[11] Above this mass, the remnant collapses to form a black hole.[5][17] The theoretical limiting mass for this type of core collapse scenario is about 40–50 M☉. Above that mass, a star is believed to collapse directly into a black hole without forming a supernova explosion,[18] although uncertainties in models of supernova collapse make calculation of these limits uncertain.
Theoretical models
The
The major unsolved problem with Type II supernovae is that it is not understood how the burst of neutrinos transfers its energy to the rest of the star producing the shock wave which causes the star to explode. From the above discussion, only one percent of the energy needs to be transferred to produce an explosion, but explaining how that one percent of transfer occurs has proven extremely difficult, even though the particle interactions involved are believed to be well understood. In the 1990s, one model for doing this involved convective overturn, which suggests that convection, either from neutrinos from below, or infalling matter from above, completes the process of destroying the progenitor star. Heavier elements than iron are formed during this explosion by neutron capture, and from the pressure of the neutrinos pressing into the boundary of the "neutrinosphere", seeding the surrounding space with a cloud of gas and dust which is richer in heavy elements than the material from which the star originally formed.[23]
In fact, some theoretical models incorporate a hydrodynamical instability in the stalled shock known as the "Standing Accretion Shock Instability" (SASI). This instability comes about as a consequence of non-spherical perturbations oscillating the stalled shock thereby deforming it. The SASI is often used in tandem with neutrino theories in computer simulations for re-energizing the stalled shock.[25]
Light curves for Type II-L and Type II-P supernovae
When the
When the luminosity of a Type II supernova is plotted over a period of time, it shows a characteristic rise to a peak brightness followed by a decline. These light curves have an average decay rate of 0.008
The difference in the shape of the light curves is believed to be caused, in the case of Type II-L supernovae, by the expulsion of most of the hydrogen envelope of the progenitor star.
Type IIn supernovae
The "n" denotes narrow, which indicates the presence of narrow or intermediate width hydrogen emission lines in the spectra. In the intermediate width case, the ejecta from the explosion may be interacting strongly with gas around the star – the circumstellar medium.[31][32] The estimated circumstellar density required to explain the observational properties is much higher than that expected from the standard stellar evolution theory.[33] It is generally assumed that the high circumstellar density is due to the high mass-loss rates of the Type IIn progenitors. The estimated mass-loss rates are typically higher than 10−3 M☉ per year. There are indications that they originate as stars similar to luminous blue variables with large mass losses before exploding.[34] SN 1998S and SN 2005gl are examples of Type IIn supernovae; SN 2006gy, an extremely energetic supernova, may be another example.[35]
Some supernovae of type IIn show interactions with the circumstellar medium, which leads to an increased temperature of the
Type IIb supernovae
A Type IIb supernova has a weak hydrogen line in its initial spectrum, which is why it is classified as a Type II. However, later on the H emission becomes undetectable, and there is also a second peak in the light curve that has a spectrum which more closely resembles a
See also
References
- Bibcode:1996A&AS..120C.303P– via SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System (ADS).
- S2CID 116987470.
- ^ "Introduction to Supernova Remnants". NASA Goddard/SAO. 2006-09-07. Archived from the original on 2020-05-28. Retrieved 2007-05-01.
- ^ a b Richmond, Michael. "Late stages of evolution for low-mass stars". Rochester Institute of Technology. Archived from the original on 2020-06-11. Retrieved 2006-08-04.
- ^ a b c d Hinshaw, Gary (2006-08-23). "The Life and Death of Stars". NASA Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Mission. Archived from the original on 2013-06-03. Retrieved 2006-09-01.
- S2CID 118974639.
- ISBN 978-0-226-10953-4.
- ^
Fewell, M. P. (1995). "The atomic nuclide with the highest mean binding energy". doi:10.1119/1.17828.
- ^ Fleurot, Fabrice. "Evolution of Massive Stars". Laurentian University. Archived from the original on 2017-05-21. Retrieved 2007-08-13.
- doi:10.1086/165813. Archivedfrom the original on 2022-01-25. Retrieved 2020-03-18.
- ^ a b Fryer, C. L.; New, K. C. B. (2006-01-24). "Gravitational Waves from Gravitational Collapse". Max Planck Institute for Gravitational Physics. Archived from the original on 2006-12-13. Retrieved 2006-12-14.
- ^
Hayakawa, T.; Iwamoto, N.; Kajino, T.; Shizuma, T.; Umeda, H.; Nomoto, K. (2006). "Principle of Universality of Gamma-Process Nucleosynthesis in Core-Collapse Supernova Explosions". The Astrophysical Journal. 648 (1): L47–L50. doi:10.1086/507703.
- ^ a b Fryer, C.L.; New, K.B.C. (2006-01-24). "Gravitational Waves from Gravitational Collapse, section 3.1". Los Alamos National Laboratory. Archived from the original on 2006-10-13. Retrieved 2006-12-09.
- ^ ISBN 978-0-7167-3097-2. Archived from the originalon 2008-05-05. Retrieved 2007-11-19.
- ISBN 978-0-300-09097-0. Archivedfrom the original on 2014-12-10. Retrieved 2007-11-19.
- ^ Barwick, S.; Beacom, J.; et al. (2004-10-29). "APS Neutrino Study: Report of the Neutrino Astrophysics and Cosmology Working Group" (PDF). American Physical Society. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2018-12-16. Retrieved 2006-12-12.
- from the original on 2020-10-31. Retrieved 2019-11-29.
- ^
Fryer, Chris L. (1999). "Mass Limits For Black Hole Formation". The Astrophysical Journal. 522 (1): 413–418. S2CID 14227409.
- ^
Izzard, R. G.; Ramírez Ruiz, E.; Tout, C. A. (2004). "Formation rates of core-collapse supernovae and gamma-ray bursts". S2CID 119447717.
- ^ a b
Rampp, M.; Buras, R.; Janka, H.-T.; Raffelt, G. (February 11–16, 2002). "Core-collapse supernova simulations: Variations of the input physics". Proceedings of the 11th Workshop on "Nuclear Astrophysics". Ringberg Castle, Tegernsee, Germany. pp. 119–125. Bibcode:2002nuas.conf..119R.
- from the original on 2007-03-21. Retrieved 2007-03-18.
- ^ "The Nobel Prize in Physics 2004". Nobel Foundation. 2004-10-05. Archived from the original on 2007-05-03. Retrieved 2007-05-30.
- ^ Stover, Dawn (2006). "Life In A Bubble". Popular Science. 269 (6): 16.
- ^ Janka, H.-T.; Langanke, K.; Marek, A.; Martínez Pinedo, G.; Mueller, B. (2007). "Theory of Core-Collapse Supernovae". Bethe Centennial Volume of Physics Reports. 142 (1–4): 38–74. .
- ^ Iwakami, Wakana; Kotake, Kei; Ohnishi, Naofumi; Yamada, Shoichi; Sawada, Keisuke (March 10–15, 2008). "3D Simulations of Standing Accretion Shock Instability in Core-Collapse Supernovae" (PDF). 14th Workshop on Nuclear Astrophysics. Archived from the original (PDF) on 15 March 2011. Retrieved 30 January 2013.
- S2CID 15493284.
- ^
Young, Timothy R. (2004). "A Parameter Study of Type II Supernova Light Curves Using 6 M He Cores". S2CID 16722121.
- ^
Rauscher, T.; Heger, A.; Hoffman, R. D.; Woosley, S. E. (2002). "Nucleosynthesis in Massive Stars With Improved Nuclear and Stellar Physics". S2CID 59039933.
- ^ a b
Doggett, J. B.; Branch, D. (1985). "A Comparative Study of Supernova Light Curves". Astronomical Journal. 90: 2303–2311. doi:10.1086/113934.
- ^ "Type II Supernova Light Curves". Swinburne University of Technology. Archived from the original on 2019-10-17. Retrieved 2007-03-17.
- S2CID 25194088.
- S2CID 119347211.
- S2CID 119288581.
- S2CID 119267259.)
{{cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link - S2CID 16959330.
- ISSN 0004-637X.
- S2CID 237554659.
- ISSN 2515-5172.
2017hcc is first mentioned in this research note as 2010jl-like, but sadly Moran et al. missed this research note.
- S2CID 253107572.
- ^ Bibcode:1996A&A...306..219U.
- S2CID 4363061.
- S2CID 118321359.
- S2CID 40884513.
- doi:10.1086/165402.
- doi:10.1086/114940.
- doi:10.1086/187043.
External links
- "List of all known Type II supernovae". The Open Supernova Catalog.
- Merrifield, Michael. Haran, B. (ed.). Type II supernovae. Sixty Symbols (video lecture). Nottingham, UK: University of Nottingham.
- Gibney, Elizabeth (2018-04-18). "How to blow up a star". S2CID 4956943.