Undergrounding

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
A former pylon transformer south of Markgröningen, Germany. Today, the pylon carries only a switch fed by two underground cables.

In

power lines less susceptible to outages during high winds, thunderstorms or heavy snow or ice storms. An added benefit of undergrounding is the aesthetic quality of the landscape without the powerlines. Undergrounding can increase the capital cost of electric power transmission and distribution but may decrease operating costs
over the lifetime of the cables.

History

Early undergrounding had a basis in the detonation of mining explosives and in undersea telegraph cables. Electric cables were used in Russia to detonate mining explosives in 1812, and to carry telegraph signals across the English Channel in 1850.[1]

With the spread of early electrical power systems, undergrounding began to increase as well. Thomas Edison used underground DC “street pipes” in his early distribution networks; they were insulated first with jute in 1880, before progressing to rubber insulation in 1882.[1]

Subsequent developments occurred in both insulation and fabrication techniques:[1]

  • 1925: Pressurized paper insulation used on cables
  • 1930: PVC insulation used on cables
  • 1942: Polyethylene insulation first used on cables
  • 1962: Ethylene propylene rubber-insulated cables become commercially available
  • 1963: Preformed cable accessories become available
  • 1970s: Shrinkable cable accessories become available

During the 20th century direct-buried cable became commonplace.

Comparison

The aerial cables that carry

pylons
are generally considered an unattractive feature of the countryside. Underground cables can transmit power across densely populated areas or areas where land is costly or environmentally or aesthetically sensitive. Underground and underwater crossings may be a practical alternative for crossing rivers.

Advantages

Disadvantages

An underground cable marker. Markers are put at regular intervals to show the route and warn of the hazard of digging into the cable.
  • Undergrounding is more expensive, since the cost of burying cables at transmission voltages is several times greater than overhead power lines, and the life-cycle cost of an underground power cable is two to four times the cost of an overhead power line. Above-ground lines cost around $10 per 1-foot (0.30 m) and underground lines cost in the range of $20 to $40 per 1-foot (0.30 m).[9] In highly urbanized areas, the cost of underground transmission can be 10–14 times as expensive as overhead.[10] However, these calculations may neglect the cost of power interruptions. The lifetime cost difference is smaller for lower-voltage distribution networks, on the range of 12-28% higher than overhead lines of equivalent voltage.[11]
  • Whereas finding and repairing overhead wire breaks can be accomplished in hours, underground repairs can take days or weeks,[12] and for this reason redundant lines are run.
  • Underground cable locations are not always obvious, which can lead to unwary diggers damaging cables or being electrocuted.
  • Operations are more difficult since the high
    reactive power of underground cables produces large charging currents and so makes voltage control more difficult. Large charging currents arise due to the higher capacitance from underground power lines and thus limits how long an AC line can be. In order to avoid the capacitance issues when undergrounding long distance transmission lines, HVDC lines can be used as they do not suffer from the same issue.[13]
  • Whereas overhead lines can easily be uprated by modifying line clearances and power poles to carry more power, underground cables cannot be uprated and must be supplemented or replaced to increase capacity. Transmission and distribution companies generally future-proof underground lines by installing the highest-rated cables while being still cost-effective.
  • Underground cables are more subject to damage by ground movement. The 2011 Christchurch earthquake in New Zealand caused damage to 360 kilometres (220 mi) of high voltage underground cables and subsequently cut power to large parts of Christchurch city, whereas only a few kilometres of overhead lines were damaged, largely due to pole foundations being compromised by liquefaction.
  • As underground repair and check up require street digging, it creates patches and potholes, leading to bumpy and unsafe ride for cars and bicycles. Utility work also increase lane closure which leads to the traffic jam and increasing cost of resurfacing work by the local government.[14][15]

The advantages can in some cases outweigh the disadvantages of the higher investment cost, and more expensive maintenance and management.

Methods

Cables under Broadway in 2013
  • Horizontal Boring – This is a method in which one uses a drill bit to bore horizontal starting at one point on the surface of the ground and creating an arc underground to come back out of the surface. This method is used when minimal damage to the surface is preferred.
  • Trench Undergrounding - Another method for undergrounding power lines is to dig trenches, lay power lines into the trench and cover them back up. This is done for the length of the power line.[16]
  • Duct Bank - A third method uses parallel conduits held by spacers with sand or concrete filled in-between the conduits. Installation methods: conduit and spacers placed directly into a trench, conduit and spacers placed in concrete forms, or pre-made sections of concrete and conduit.[17]

Regulations

Europe

The UK regulator

Dorset AONB. Similar schemes are planned for Snowdonia, the Peak District and the North Wessex Downs.[18]

The most visually intrusive overhead cables of the core transmission network are excluded from the scheme. Some undergrounding projects are funded by the proceeds of national lottery.

All low and medium voltage electrical power (<50 kV) in the Netherlands is now supplied underground.

In Germany, 73% of the medium voltage cables are underground and 87% of low voltage cables are underground. The high percentage of underground cables contributes to the very high grid reliability (SAIDI < 20).[19] In comparison, the SAIDI value (minutes without electricity per year) in the Netherlands is about 30, and in the UK it is about 70.

California

In the United States, the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) Rule 20 permits the undergrounding of electrical power cables under certain situations. Rule 20A projects are paid for by all customers of the utility companies. Rule 20B projects are partially funded this way and cover the cost of an equivalent overhead system. Rule 20C projects enable property owners to fund the undergrounding.

Japan

Most electrical power in Japan is still distributed by aerial cables. In Tokyo's 23 wards, according to Japan's Construction and Transport Ministry, just 7.3 percent of cables were laid underground as of March 2008.

Variants

A compromise between undergrounding and using overhead lines is installing air cables. Aerial cables are insulated cables spun between poles and used for power transmission or telecommunication services. An advantage of aerial cables is that their insulation removes the danger of electric shock (unless the cables are damaged). Another advantage is that they forgo the costs—particularly high in rocky areas—of burying. The disadvantages of aerial cables are that they have the same aesthetic issues as standard overhead lines and that they can be affected by storms. However, if the insulation is not destroyed during pylon failure or when hit by a tree, there is no interruption of service. Electrical hazards are minimised and re-hanging the cables may be possible without power interruption.

See also

References

  1. ^
    S2CID 30589908. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help
    )
  2. ^ "How Do Power Lines Cause Wildfires?". Texas Wildfire Mitigation Project. 2014-02-13. Retrieved 2018-05-13.
  3. ^ "Underground power cables".
  4. ^ "To curb power theft, Maharashtra explores underground supply network across state". DNA India. 11 May 2015. Retrieved 20 July 2015.
  5. ^ "No party for thousands of Victoria residents after rogue balloons hit power lines". CBC. Retrieved 7 August 2020.
  6. ^ "Truck snags power line, causes major damage downtown". The Mount Airy News. 22 July 2020. Retrieved 7 August 2020.
  7. ^ Letters to the editors The State (subscription required)
  8. ^ "Urban Forests | American Forests". Archived from the original on 2016-01-18. Retrieved 2016-01-18.
  9. ^ "Edison Electric Institute - Underground Vs. Overhead Distribution Wires: Issues to Consider" (PDF). Retrieved 11 November 2023.
  10. ^ Los Angeles Department of Water & Power System Development Division cost estimate data
  11. doi:10.3390/en7031656.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link
    )
  12. ^ "Should Power Lines be Underground?" (PDF). Retrieved 11 November 2023.
  13. ^ "Underground vs. Overhead Transmission and Distribution" (PDF). Retrieved 2019-05-09.
  14. ^ "Roadway resurfacing in Boston". 9 July 2018.
  15. ^ Residents of South City neighborhood say digging by utility is leaving bumpy patches on road, retrieved 2022-03-19
  16. ^ "Underground Transmission Lines". Archived from the original on 2021-12-21. Retrieved 2019-05-09.
  17. ^ "NEC 310.60". Retrieved 2021-11-13.
  18. ISSN 1357-4442
    .
  19. ^ "Netzausbau in Deutschland" (PDF). kas.de (in German). Retrieved 11 November 2023.

External links

Wikimedia Commons has media related to Underground power lines.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Undergrounding&oldid=1191086537"