United Kingdom and weapons of mass destruction

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
NPT party
Yes (1968, one of five recognised powers)

The

biological, and chemical weapons. The United Kingdom is one of the five official nuclear weapon states under the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons. The UK renounced the use of chemical and biological weapons in 1956 and subsequently destroyed its general stocks.[4]

Biological weapons

During the

Gruinard which left it contaminated and fenced off for nearly fifty years until an intensive four-year program to eradicate the spores was completed in 1990. They also manufactured five million linseed-oil cattle cakes with a hole bored into them for addition of anthrax spores between 1942 and mid-1943. These were to be dropped on Germany using specially designed containers each holding 400 cakes, in a project known as Operation Vegetarian. It was intended that the disease would destroy the German beef and dairy herds and possibly spread to the human population. Preparations were not complete until early 1944. Operation Vegetarian was only to be used in the event of a German anthrax attack on the United Kingdom.[5]

Offensive weapons development continued after the war into the 1950s with tests of

equine encephalomyelitis and vaccinia viruses (the latter as a relatively safe simulant for smallpox
).

In particular, five sets of trials took place at sea using aerosol clouds and animals.

The program was canceled in 1956 when the British government renounced the use of biological and chemical weapons. In 1974,

Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention
in March 1975.

Chemical weapons

The UK was a signatory of the

First World War, in retaliation to the use of chlorine by Germany against British troops from April 1915 onwards, British forces deployed chlorine themselves for the first time during the Battle of Loos
on 25 September 1915. By the end of the war, poison gas use had become widespread on both sides and by 1918 a quarter of artillery shells were filled with gas and Britain had produced around 25,400 tons of toxic chemicals.

Britain used a range of poison gases, originally

Use of poison gas in World War I
.

After the war, the

Bolshevik troops in 1919, and Winston Churchill, secretary of state for war and air, suggested that the RAF use it in Iraq in 1920 during a major revolt there. Historians are divided as to whether or not gas was in fact used.[7]

The UK ratified the Geneva Protocol on 9 April 1930. The UK signed the Chemical Weapons Convention on 13 January 1993 and ratified it on 13 May 1996.

Despite the signing of the Geneva Protocol, the UK carried out extensive testing of chemical weapons from the early 1930s onwards. In the Rawalpindi experiments, hundreds of Indian soldiers were exposed to mustard gas in an attempt to determine the appropriate dosage to use on battlefields. Many of the subjects suffered severe burns from their exposure to the gas.[8]

Many ex-servicemen have complained about suffering long-term illnesses after taking part in tests on nerve agents. It was alleged that before volunteering they were not provided with adequate information about the experiments and the risk, in breach of the Nuremberg Code of 1947. Alleged abuses at Porton Down became the subject of a lengthy police investigation called Operation Antler, which covered the use of volunteers in testing a variety of chemical weapons and countermeasures from 1939 until 1989. An inquest was opened on 5 May 2004 into the death on 6 May 1953 of a serviceman, Ronald Maddison, during an experiment using sarin. His death had earlier been found by a private MoD inquest to have been as a result of "misadventure" but this was quashed by the High Court in 2002. The 2004 hearing closed on 15 November, after a jury found that the cause of Maddison's death was "application of a nerve agent in a non-therapeutic experiment".

Nuclear weapons

Trident missile launched from a submerged ballistic missile submarine
.

British nuclear weapons are designed and developed by the UK's

Trident missiles. The principle of operation is based on maintaining deterrent effect by always having at least one submarine at sea, and was designed during the Cold War
period. One submarine is normally undergoing maintenance and the remaining two are in port or on training exercises.

Each submarine carries up to sixteen

Trident II
D-5 missiles, which can each carry up to twelve warheads, for a maximum of 192 warheads per vessel. However, the British government announced in 1998 that each submarine would carry only 48 warheads (halving the limit specified by the previous government), which is an average of three per missile. However one or two missiles per submarine are probably armed with fewer warheads for "sub-strategic" use causing others to be armed with more.

The British-designed warheads are thought to be selectable between 0.3

kilotons, 5–10 kt and 100 kt; the yields obtained using either the unboosted primary, the boosted primary, or the entire "physics package". The United Kingdom has purchased the rights to 58 missiles under the Polaris Sales Agreement (modified for Trident) from the United States Navy's "pool". These missiles are fitted with United Kingdom–built warheads and are exchanged when requiring maintenance. Under the agreement the United States was given certain assurances by the UK regarding the use of the missiles; however the United States does not have any veto on the use of British nuclear weapons.[9][10] Some non-nuclear components for the British nuclear warhead are procured from the U.S. for reasons of cost effectiveness.[11]

The United Kingdom is one of the five "Nuclear Weapons States" (NWS) under the

Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty
, which the UK ratified in 1968.

The UK permits the U.S. to deploy nuclear weapons from its territory, the first having arrived in 1954.

F-15E aircraft.[13]

In March 2007, the UK Parliament voted to

renew the country's Trident nuclear submarine system at a cost of £20bn.[14] In July 2008, The Guardian claimed that the decision had already been made to replace and upgrade Britain's nuclear warhead stockpile at a cost of £3bn, extending the life of the warheads until 2055.[15]

On 25 February 2020, the UK released a Written Statement outlining that the current UK nuclear warheads will be replaced and will match the US Trident SLBM and related systems.[16]

In March 2021, the British government published the Integrated Review, titled Global Britain in a Competitive Age, which reaffirmed the government's commitment to upgrading and maintaining Trident as a continuous at-sea deterrent. The review also announced that the cap for the UK's stockpile of nuclear warheads would rise from 180 to 260 — the first time it has risen since the Cold War[17] — due to the "evolving security environment".[18]

See also

References

  1. ^ "The British Nuclear Stockpile, 1953-2013", Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 1 July 2013
  2. ^ a b "Nuclear Weapons: Who Has What at a Glance". Arms Control Association. ACA. Retrieved 1 October 2016.
  3. ^ "Global nuclear weapons: downsizing but modernizing". SIPRI. Retrieved 1 October 2016.
  4. ^ "Britain to expand nuclear warhead stockpile by over 40% as global threats rise". Reuters. March 16, 2021 – via www.reuters.com.
  5. ^ Changing Direction: British Military Planning for Post-war Strategic Defence, 1942-47 by Julian Lewis
  6. ^ Fenton, Ben (2005-09-20). "Trawler steamed into germ warfare site and no one said a word". London: Daily Telegraph. Archived from the original on 2012-06-30. Retrieved 26 May 2010.
  7. ^ "British Relations with Iraq". BBC News. February 10, 2003.
  8. ^ Rosenberg, Jennifer (September 4, 2007). "Mustard Gas Tested on Indian Soldiers".
  9. ^ Assistant Director (Deterrence Policy) (19 July 2005), Freedom of Information request about the UK nuclear deterrent (PDF), Ministry of Defence, archived from the original (PDF) on 26 October 2012, retrieved 2013-11-20 {{citation}}: |author= has generic name (help)
  10. ^ "How serious was the Trident missile test failure?". UK Defence Journal. 22 January 2017. Retrieved 24 January 2017.
  11. ^ "Royal Navy welcomes US Navy Admiral to Edinburgh Tattoo". Royal Navy. 25 August 2017. Retrieved 19 September 2017.
  12. U.S. Department of Defense
    , retrieved 2006-05-23
  13. ^ Hans M. Kristensen (February 2005), U.S. Nuclear Weapons in Europe (PDF), Natural Resources Defense Council, retrieved 2006-05-23
  14. ^ Trident plan wins Commons support, BBC News, March 14, 2007, retrieved 2006-05-23
  15. ^ "Britain plans to spend £3bn on new nuclear warheads", The Guardian (London), 25 July 2008
  16. ^ "Nuclear Deterrent". hansard.parliament.uk. UK Hansard. 25 February 2020. Retrieved 26 February 2020.
  17. ^ "UK To Increase Its Nuclear Warhead Stockpile For The First Time Since The Cold War: Report" (PDF). The Wire. 16 March 2021. Retrieved 15 March 2021.
  18. ^ "Global Britain in a Competitive Age: the Integrated Review of Security, Defence, Development and Foreign Policy". GOV.UK. Cabinet Office. 16 March 2021.

Further reading

  • Boudeau, Carole. "Missing the logic of the text: Lord Butler’s report on intelligence on Iraqi weapons of mass destruction." Journal of Language and Politics 11.4 (2012): 543–561.
  • Fidler, David P. "International law and weapons of mass destruction: end of the arms control approach." Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law 14 (2004): 39+ online.
  • Jones, Matthew. The Official History of the UK Strategic Nuclear Deterrent: Volume I: From the V-Bomber Era to the Arrival of Polaris, 1945-1964 (Taylor & Francis, 2017).
  • Jones, Matthew. The Official History of the UK Strategic Nuclear Deterrent: Volume II: The Labour Government and the Polaris Programme, 1964-1970 (Taylor & Francis, 2017).
  • Salisbury, Daniel. Secrecy, Public Relations and the British Nuclear Debate: How the UK Government Learned to Talk about the Bomb, 1970-83 (Routledge, 2020).

External links