Uranium mining and the Navajo people

Edit links
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Acid mine drainage in Animas river following the Gold King Mine Spill

Uranium mining and the Navajo people began in 1944 in northeastern Arizona, northwestern New Mexico, and southeastern Utah.

In the 1950s, the

associated health hazards.[1] The cultural significance of water for the Navajo people and the environmental damage to both the land and livestock inhibits the ability of the Navajo people to practice their culture.[2]

The Navajo Nation was affected by the United States' largest radioactive accident during the Church Rock uranium mill spill in 1979 when a tailings pond upstream from Navajo County breached its dam and sent radioactive waste down the Puerco River, injuring people and killing livestock.[3]

In the Navajo Nation, approximately 15% of people do not have access to running water.[4] Navajo Nation residents are often forced to resort to unregulated water sources that are susceptible to bacteria, fecal matter, and uranium. Extensive uranium mining in the region during the mid-20th century is a contemporary concern because of contamination of these commonly used sources, in addition to the lingering health effects of exposure from mining.

Water in the Navajo Nation currently has an average of 90 micrograms per liter of uranium, with some areas reaching upwards of 700 micrograms per liter.

End Stage Renal Disease of 0.63% in the Navajo Nation, a rate significantly higher than the national average of 0.19%.[8]

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has been cleaning up uranium mines in the Navajo Nation since as part of settlements through the Superfund since 1994. The Abandoned Mine Land program and Contaminated Structures Program have facilitated the cleanup of mines and demolition of structures built with radioactive materials.[9] Criticisms of unfair, inefficient treatment have been made repeatedly of EPA by Navajos and journalists.[10][11][12]

In October 2021, the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights agreed to hear a case filed by the Eastern Navajo Diné Against Uranium Mining, which accused the United States government of violating the human rights of Navajo Nation members.[13]

Shiprock, New Mexico uranium mill aerial photo

History

For the book published in 2006, see The Navajo People and Uranium Mining.

In 1944, uranium mining under the U.S military's

Lakota Nation lands. On August 1, 1946, the responsibility for atomic science and technology was transferred from the military to the United States Atomic Energy Commission. Afterward, widespread uranium mining began on Navajo and Lakota lands in a nuclear arms race with the Soviet Union during the Cold War
.

Large

Environmental Protection Agency
in 1970 and passage of related laws, the mining endangered thousands of Navajo workers, as well as producing contamination that has persisted in adversely affecting air and water quality, and contaminating Navajo lands.

Private companies hired thousands of Navajo men to work the uranium mines. Disregarding the known health risks of exposure to uranium, the private companies and the United States Atomic Energy Commission failed to inform the Navajo workers about the dangers and to regulate the mining to minimize contamination. As more data was collected, they were slow to take appropriate action for the workers.

In 1951, the

Tuskegee syphilis experiment. The experiment on Navajo mine workers and their families documented high rates of cancers (including Xeroderma pigmentosum)[14] and other diseases which manifested from uranium mining and milling contamination. For decades, industry and the government failed to regulate or improve conditions, or inform workers of the dangers. As high rates of illness began to occur, workers were often unsuccessful in court cases seeking compensation, and the states at first did not officially recognize radon illness. In 1990, the US Congress passed the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act, to address cases of uranium poisoning and provide needed compensation, but Navajo Nation applicants provide evidence RECA requirements prevent access to necessary compensation. Congressional modifications to RECA application requirements were made in 2000, and were introduced in 2017 and in 2018.[15]

Since 1988, the Navajo Nation's Abandoned Mine Lands program

Environmental Protection Agency estimates that there are 4000 mines with documented uranium production, and another 15,000 locations with uranium occurrences in 14 western states.[18] Most are located in the Four Corners area and Wyoming.[19]

The Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act (1978) is a United States environmental law that amended the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 and authorized the Environmental Protection Agency to establish health and environmental standards for the stabilization, restoration, and disposal of uranium mill waste.[20] Cleanup has continued to be difficult, and EPA administers several Superfund sites located on the Navajo Nation.

On April 29, 2005, Navajo Nation President Joe Shirley Jr. signed the Diné Natural Resources Protection Act of 2005 that outlaws uranium mining and processing on Navajo Nation lands.

Pressure for uranium mining increased in the postwar years, when the United States developed resources to compete with the Soviet Union in the Cold War. In 1948, the United States Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) announced it would be the sole purchaser of any uranium mined in the United States, to cut off dependence on imported uranium. The AEC would not mine the uranium; it contracted with private mining companies for the product.[21] The subsequent mining boom led to the creation of thousands of mines; 92% of all western mines were located on the Colorado Plateau because of regional resources.[22]

The

Navajo men traveled miles to work in the mines, sometimes taking their families with them.[21] Between 1944 and 1989, 3.9 million tons of uranium ore were mined from the mountains and plains.[24]

In 1951, the

Environmental Protection Agency was established on December 2, 1970. But, environmental regulation could not repair the damage already suffered. Navajo miners contracted a variety of cancers including lung cancer at much higher rates than the rest of the U.S. population, and they have suffered higher rates of other lung diseases caused by breathing in radon.[21]

Private companies resisted regulation through lobbying Congress and state legislatures. In 1990, the United States Congress finally passed the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act (RECA), granting reparations for those affected by the radiation. The act was amended in 2000 to address criticisms and problems with the original legislation.[22]

The tribal council and Navajo delegates remained in control of mining decisions before the adverse health effects of mining were identified.[25] No one fully understood the effect of radon exposure for miners, as there was insufficient data before the expansion of mining.[26][27]

Church Rock uranium mill spill

Main article: Church Rock uranium mill spill
United Nuclear Corporation Church Rock Uranium Mill

On July 16, 1979, the tailings pond at United Nuclear Corporation's uranium mill in

aquifers and left stagnating, contaminated pools on the riverside.[28][29][30]

More radioactivity was released in the spill than in the

radioactive accident
in U.S. history.

The state contingency plan relied on English-only notification of the largely Navajo public populace affected by the spill. Local residents did not learn immediately of the toxic danger.[31] The locals were accustomed to using the riverside for recreation and herb gathering. Residents who waded in the acidic water went to the hospital complaining of burning feet and were misdiagnosed with heat stroke. Sheep and cattle died en masse.[29] The Navajo Nation asked the governor of New Mexico to request disaster assistance from the US government and have the site declared a disaster area, but the governor refused.[31] This limited the amount of disaster relief the Navajo Nation received.

For nearly two years, the state and federal government trucked in water to the reservation, but ended the program in 1981. Farmers had little choice but to resume use of the river for watering livestock and crops.[32]

Health studies on exposure to uranium

Concerned over the adverse health consequences which Europeans experienced from uranium mines, William Bale and John Harley conducted an independent study. Their work led the US government to start the United States Public Health Study (USPHS) on uranium mine workers. Bale and Harley's studies focused on identifying the level of radon in mines and assessing any correlation with

environment exposures, and to conduct a medical evaluation of the miners.[22]

Ethical concerns

The USPHS study raised ethical concerns. The Navajo workers were rarely notified of the possible dangers which the USPHS was studying.[21] As late as 1960, the USPHS medical consent form failed to inform miners about the possible health risks of working in the mine.[22] The Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments, created in 1994 to explore the treatment of the workers, said: "'Had they been better informed, they could have sought help in publicizing the fact that working conditions in the mines were extremely hazardous, which might have resulted in some mines being ventilated earlier than they were."[22] The USPHS failed to abide by a centerpiece of Nuremberg Code (1947), by failing to have informed consent of the subjects of a research study.[21]

In 1952, the USPHS issued two reports, reporting exceptionally high concentrations of radon in these uranium mines, even higher than those found in European mines years before.[22] Medically, there was little evidence found of sickness. But, the latency from exposure to disease, also found among the European cases, explains why there were few medical effects observed at this early stage.[22] In a private meeting between the AEC and the USPHS, the AEC informed the USPHS scientists that not only could the high radon levels eventually cause cancer, but proper ventilation of the mines could avoid the problem.[21] The government failed to take any action on this finding.[21]

Continued effects and research

The USPHS continued to study the uranium miners, eventually including 4,000 American Indian and non-Indian underground uranium miners. They added miners in 1951, 1953, 1954, 1957 and 1960.[22] In 1962, the USPHS published the first account of the effects of radon exposure. It found a significant correlation between radon exposure and cancer.[21] Additional studies were published in 1968, 1973, 1976, 1981, 1987, 1995 and 1997; these demonstrated linear relationships between radon exposure and lung cancer, a latency period of about 20 years between radon exposure and health effects, and noted that, while smoking tobacco caused a shorter latency period for the development of cancer, it did not fully explain the relationship between radon and cancer.[22] Similar reports found instances of other diseases such as pneumoconiosis, tuberculosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), as well as diseases of the blood.[22] A 2000 study of the number of cancer cases among Navajo uranium mine workers concluded that the miners were 28.6 times more likely to contract the disease than the study's control group.[33]

Many miners died from radiation-related illnesses. A 1995 report published by American Public Health Association found:

excess mortality rates for lung cancer, pneumoconioses and other respiratory diseases, and tuberculosis for Navajo uranium miners. Increasing duration of exposure to underground uranium mining was associated with increased mortality risk for all three diseases… The most important long-term mortality risks for the Navajo uranium miners continue to be lung cancer and pneumoconioses and other nonmalignant respiratory diseases.[34]

Over the decades, Navajo miners extracted some four million tons of uranium ore, which was used by the U.S. government primarily to make nuclear weapons. Some miners, unaware of the adverse health effects, carried contaminated rocks and tailings from local mines to build their family homes. These were found to be contaminated, with the family at risk. In 2009, those homes began to be demolished and rebuilt under a new government program, which involved temporarily relocating occupants until the homes could be rebuilt.[35]

Dr. Leon Gottlieb, a pulmonary specialist was the first physician that noted an increase in lung disorders among the Navajo uranium miners. He would later report in a 1982 study that showed of the 17 Navajos that were being observed for lung disorders in this case lung cancer, 16 of the Navajos were uranium miners.[36] Along with studies regarding the correlation between uranium miners and lung cancer there have been other studies that suggest that miscarriages, birth defects, reproductive, bone and gastric cancer along with heart disease deaths have also been identified as related health effects of uranium mining (Churchill 1986, Gofman 1981, McLeod 1985).[36] Even just living near a uranium mill mining area has been linked to birth defects among babies with mothers who live close to the mill, lung cancer, leukemia, cell damage, renal cancer, and stomach cancer . A study was conducted to compare residents who are close to the mining areas and those who are distant. The results show that the residents living near the mining areas suffered from:

  • 1500% increase in testicular and ovarian cancer in children;
  • 500% increase in bone cancer in children;
  • 250% increase in leukemia;
  • 200% increase in miscarriage, infant death, congenital defects, and learning disorders.[37]

Dr. Joseph Wagoner, a health expert collected data regarding the health effects of uranium since 1960 for the US Public Health Service, would report that from 1960 to 1974 there were 144 cancer deaths among 3,500 miners, 700 to 800 of whom were Navajo.[36] Statistically, approximately 30 deaths would have been expected instead of the 144 which were discovered (Bergman 1982). Apart from respiratory diseases and other significant health problems the American Indian communities experienced psycho-social problems, such as depression and anxiety.[38] Residents near the uranium mills reported increased levels of anxiety due to their proximity to the uranium mills and the health hazards of their living conditions along with the lack of awareness among the workers as they would bring contaminated rocks back to their homes.

A study was conducted by the National University of General Martín, Avda Gral Paz to review the cellular consequences of the inhalation of uranium compounds. The accumulation of both insoluble and soluble uranium in macrophages (since macrophages are among the main cells to respond to internalized metallic particles) demonstrated that the exposure to both uranium compounds by inhalation resulted in the breakage of DNA strands along with an increase of inflammatory cytokines and hydro-peroxides production.[39] This reviewed the molecular impacts of uranium contamination that could result in respiratory diseases (neoplasia and fibrosis).[39]

United States government response

Following the publication of the reports in the early 1950s, some private contractors attempted to properly ventilate their mines. The states of Colorado, New Mexico and Utah established minimum standards for radon concentrations (Dawson and Madsen 2007). But, the AEC was lax in enforcement of the rules; AEC commissioners did not establish national radon standards at the time the studies were released.[22] The AEC said it had no authority to regulate uranium, but it regulated beryllium. The health and activist communities have criticized the AEC for its failure to take action related to the scientific reports. The agency repressed the reports.[22]

Government and uranium industry personnel were privy to the information, but it was not until the 1960s that workers were informed of the environmental dangers.[22] The government response continued to be slow. Regulation of the uranium industry was first debated in Congress in 1966, but little progress was made. Journalists began to publish stories detailing the illnesses of uranium miners, giving them public attention.[21] In 1969, Congress set the standard radon level for mines at .3 WL.[21]

Navajo miners began to file lawsuits to seek compensation for health damages, but often lost in court. But the publicity, presentation of harmful evidence, and victim testimony gave support to their cause.[22] Ted Kennedy (D-MA) was the first senator to propose a Radiation Compensation bill, with the goal of avoiding lawsuits and compensating victims fully, though it was defeated in 1979. Orrin Hatch's (R-UT) 1981 compensation bill was met with a similar fate, and his attempt in 1983 did not reach the Senate floor.[22]

Progress toward legislation

In 1989, Orrin Hatch, supported by fellow Utah Representative

birth certificates and official documents, some of which the Navajo did not possess. In some cases, the government did not recognize individuals' documentation as legitimate.[22]

With additional data from the studies by the

Public Health Service (PHS), in 2000 the act was amended to correct shortcomings: "The RECA Amendments of 2000 broadened the scope of eligibility for benefits to include two new occupationally exposed claimant categories (uranium mill workers and uranium ore transporters), expanding both the time periods and geographic areas covered, and adding compensable diseases, thus allowing more individuals to be eligible to qualify."[41] As of November 17, 2009, the government has paid claims of 21,810 people, denied 8,789, and paid $1,455,257,096 in reparations.[42]

Abandoned Mine Land Program

The Navajo Nation Abandoned Mine Land(s) (NN AML) are numerous

Navajo people which were used for mining (e.g., uranium)
. Sites include:

"During the late 1990s, portions...were closed by the Navajo Nation Abandoned Mine Land program".[44]

EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) maintains a partnership with the Navajo Nation. Since 1994, the Superfund Program has provided technical assistance and funding to assess potentially contaminated sites and to develop a response. The EPA has entered into enforcement agreements and settlements valued at over $1.7 billion to reduce the highest risks of radiation exposure to the Navajo people from AUMs (Abandoned Uranium Mines). As a result, funds are available to begin the assessment and cleanup process at 219 of the 523 abandoned uranium mines as of May 2019.[46]

The Abandoned Uranium Mine Settlement fact sheet provides information on the abandoned-uranium-mines enforcement agreements and settlements to address abandoned uranium mines on the Navajo Nation. To learn more about EPA's Superfund legal agreements please visit Negotiating Superfund Settlements. Uranium mining took place on the Navajo Nation from 1944 to 1986, and some local residents used materials from uranium mines when building their homes Mining materials that were used can potentially lead to exposure exceeding background (naturally occurring) levels. These materials include ore and waste rock used for foundations, walls, or fireplaces; mine tailings mixed into cement used for foundations, floors, and cinder block walls; and other contaminated building materials (wood, metal, etc.) that may have been salvaged from the abandoned mine areas.[47]

The EPA and the Navajo Nation Environmental Protection Agency's Archived 2019-12-08 at the Wayback Machine (NNEPA) Contaminated Structures Program evaluates structures on Navajo Nation that may have been constructed using abandoned mine materials or built on or near abandoned mines. The Contaminated Structures Program is responsible for conducting evaluations of potentially contaminated structures, yards and material, as well as removal and cleanup of contaminated structures and materials if there is an exposure risk. The program is for Navajo residents living close to mines or who know their home was built with contaminated materials. Participation in the program is voluntary and at no cost to the resident. USEPA and NNEPA have completed over 1,100 assessments on Navajo Nation since the program began in 2007.[48]

Areas affected by Abandoned Uranium Mines

History

This specific Superfund site for the AUMs on Navajo land has been in existence since 1994. This is following many years of research on the health effects of uranium mining which eventually led to the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act in 1990. Since its acceptance as a Superfund site, many federal, tribal, and grassroots organizations have come together to assess and remediate contamination sites on the Navajo Nation. Due to the fact that there are hundreds of contaminated sites, there have been a few big successes and many communities stuck in limbo. The following is a history of this Superfund site, the organizations that have collaborated on this environmental remediation, and recent criticisms of the handling of this large and complicated problem.

The Abandoned Uranium Mines on the Navajo Nation were established as a Superfund site in 1994 in response to a Congressional hearing brought by the Navajo Nation on November 4, 1993. This hearing included the

Pacific Islands, and Tribal Nations. The site's official EPA # is NNN000906087 and it is located in Congressional District 4. According to the EPA's Superfund site overview, other names for the AUMs may include "Navajo Abandoned Uranium Mines" or "Northeast Church Rock Mine." Church Rock Mine is one of the EPA's most successful clean-up sites among over 500 sites spanning the 27,000 square mile Navajo Nation.[50]

Nearly four years after the initial Congressional hearing, the EPA announced their first helicopter survey for the AUMs in September 1997. Located in the Oljato area in Southeastern

gamma radiation) coming from abandoned uranium mining areas." The stated purpose of these surveys was to "determine if these sites pose a risk to the people in the area and if so, what measures should be taken to minimize that risk."[51]

Over ten years later, on June 9, 2008, the EPA announced its five-year plan for the clean-up of uranium contamination on the Navajo Nation.[52] This five-year plan contained nine specific objectives for 2008–2012: assess up to 500 contaminated structures and remediate those that pose a health risk; assess up to 70 potentially contaminated water sources and assist those affected by it; assess and require cleanup of AUMs via a tiered ranking system of high priority mines; clean Church Rock Mine, the highest-priority mine; remediate groundwater of abandoned uranium milling sites; assess the Highway 160 site; assess and clean Tuba City Dump; assess and treat health conditions for populations near AUMs; and lastly to summarize the action of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) in its assistance to the Navajo Nation's cleanup efforts. Since the introduction of the five-year plan, the EPA has released a progress report (available online) each consecutive year. As of August 2011, the EPA lists its accomplishments as: screening 683 structures, sampling 250 unregulated water sources and shutting down 3 such contaminated sources, provision of public outreach and educational programs for safe water practices, instituting a 2.6 million dollar water hauling feasibility project, and providing up to 386 homes with clean drinking water through a 20 million dollar project with Indian Health Services. For 2012, the EPA has listed its next steps as replacing 6 contaminated structures, demolishing other contaminated structures, and continuing screening of these structures for referral to the EPA's Response Program. The 2011 progress report also lists Church Rock, the Oljato Mesa, and the Mariano Lake Mine as sites of current or proposed remediation.[53]

According to the EPA's website, the AUM Superfund site is not on the National Priorities List (NPL) and has no proposals to be put on this list. The NPL is the list of hazardous Superfund sites that are deemed eligible for long-term environmental remediation. The EPA suggests that although NPL listing is a possibility it is "not likely" for the abandoned uranium mines on the Navajo nation. NPL status guides the EPA in its decisions on sites to further investigate,[54] a process that has been criticized for the handling of these mines. With over 500 uranium sites and only a few sites slated for full-scale remediation plans, the prioritization process has recently[when?] been called into question by The New York Times (see Recent Press).

Partnership agencies

Superfund works with many agencies from both the federal government and the Navajo Nation in order to properly assess and direct funding to mining sites. These agencies include: the Navajo Nation Environmental Protection Agency (NNEPA), the

Indian Health Services
(IHS), the Diné Network for Environmental Health (DiNEH), the Navajo Nation Department of Water Resources (NNDWR), the Department of Energy (DOE), and US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). The NNEPA was established in 1972 and officially recognized through legislation as a separate regulatory branch of the Navajo Nation in 1995. With the official acceptance of the NNEPA also came the adoption of the Navajo Nation Environmental Policy Act. According to the NNEPA website, their mission is: "With respect to Diné values, to protect human health, land, air and water by developing, implementing and enforcing environmental laws and regulations with a commitment to public participation, sustainability, partnership, and restoration."
Center for Disease Control
and the DiNEH Project are also integral players in the assessment of water quality and community outreach. The Navajo Nation Department of Water Resources, with funding from the EPA, assist Navajo residents by hauling water for residents near 4 contaminated water sources, a 2.6 million dollar project. Indian Health Services helped fund the 20 million dollar drinking water project started in 2011. This project serves 386 homes near 10 contaminated water sources. The NNEPA, IHS, NNDWR, and DiNEH project have been the main partners with the US EPA in water hauling projects.

Criticism and press

Despite the EPA's claims of a "strong partnership with the Navajo Nation," recent articles have been published that call into question the equitability and efficiency of the EPA's action on the abandoned uranium mines. On March 31, 2012, The New York Times published an article entitled "Uranium Mines Dot Navajo Land, Neglected and Still Perilous"[56] by Leslie MacMillan. The article suggests that politics and money are influencing the prioritization of mine clean-up efforts. David Shafer, an environmental manager at the United States Department of Energy, has said that questions of whether current uranium problems are due to past mining or to the naturally occurring mineral are delaying the process of cleaning up. Similar concerns are common in environmental remediation projects for victims of industrial pollution.

While the EPA does prioritize mines that are nearest to people's homes, MacMillan highlights some remote locations where people do live and yet have been neglected by the EPA. Cameron, Arizona is one such site which has a population of nearly 1000. Rancher Larry Gordy stumbled across an abandoned uranium mine on his grazing land for his cattle near Cameron in the summer of 2010. There are still no warning signs in the town of Cameron to alert people of potential contamination. On December 30, 2010 Scientific American published an article entitled "Abandoned Uranium Mines: An 'Overwhelming Problem' in the Navajo Nation"[57] by Francie Diep. Diep told Gordy's story and reported that the EPA assessed his site on November 9, 2010. Diep suggested that this date was moved up due to publicity of Gordy's story; originally the EPA had promised to visit within six months of his original discovery of the uranium mine.

Similar allegations of prioritization due to negative publicity for the EPA were made of the Skyline Mine in the Oljato Mesa. Elsie Begay, a 71-year-old Navajo woman from the Oljato region was the topic of a series of articles in

The Los Angeles Times in 2006.[58]
 These articles were written by Yellow Dirt: An American Story of a Poisoned Land and a People Betrayed (2010) author Judy Pasternak, whose work on these articles led to her book. One EPA representative, Jason Musante, stated this publicity "might have bumped the site up the priority list."

Over a year after Gordy stumbled across the mine in his cattle's grazing land, MacMillan reports that the site at Cameron has yet to be given a priority by the EPA. When EPA officials were asked to accompany a reporter to the Cameron site, the officials declined and instead offered to visit the newly cleaned site in Oljato. MacMillan spoke with a Navajo hotel manager near the Skyline Mine who expressed hesitation about the EPAs remediation, stating, "That's what they want you to see: something that's all nice and cleaned up." MacMillan drew attention to the fact that cows are grazing on contaminated land and people are eating these cattle. Taylor McKinnon, a director at the Center for Biological Diversity, went so far as to say the site was the "worst he had seen in the Southwest." Although the locally grown beef is tested, standard tests for meat do not include checking for radioactive substances like uranium. The EPA has put an emphasis on health effects throughout its five-year plan, so the lack of any sort of attention in this matter has raised eyebrows.

In addition to the questioning of political bias in the prioritization of mining sites, there is criticism of the EPA's decision to revisit a 1989 permit proposing to mine for uranium near Church Rock. New Mexico's KUNM radio station reported on May 9, 2012 that Uranium Resources Incorporated has expressed interest in starting production near Church Rock by the end of 2013.[59] An online petition has already gained nearly 10,000 signatures against this new mining initiative.

Navajo treatment, impact and response

Beginning in the 1960s, uranium miners were beginning to become ill with cancer at increasing rates.[21] The state of Utah did not recognize radiation exposure at the time as a category of illness, making workers compensation unattainable for many of the sick Navajo (Dawson and Madsen 2007). Private industry's treatment of the Navajo workers was poor, according to recent standards: companies failed to educate workers on precautionary measures, did not install sufficient engineering controls, such as adequate ventilation; and did not provide sufficient safety equipment to protect workers to the known dangers related to the mines.[60] The Navajo were never told of the radiation effects, and did not have a word for it in their language. Many Navajo did not speak English and trusted the uranium companies to have their interests in mind.[60] Navajo workers and residents have felt betrayed as the results of the studies became known, as well as the long delays by companies and the US government to try to prevent the damage, and to pay compensation.[60] Lung cancer became so prevalent among the Navajo people that working in uranium mines was banned on Navajo lands in 2005.[23]

Following the Gold King Mine Spill in 2015, farmers lost 75% of their crops due to the lack of clean water.[61] The EPA provided the Navajo with water, but it was contaminated with oil, poisoning the land and killing the livestock.[62] Duane Yazzie, a Navajo Tribe member, spoke about the spiritual and cultural importance that agriculture plays in the Navajo culture and how both the oil and uranium contamination infringed upon their ability to practice their culture.[61] In the case of environmental hazards such as the Gold King mine spill, the EPA offers The Standard Form 95 where claims of economic damages, unemployment, loss of income, or damage to property can be filed as a result of an environmental incident.[63] However, Ethel Branch, the Navajo Nation attorney general said this form contained backhanded, offensive language that would diminish one's ability to get full financial compensation and restrict their ability to file additional, future claims.[62]

Implicit racism

White workers also faced different conditions: Navajo workers were forced to enter the mine directly after a detonation, while it was filled with dust and smoke. However, the white workers were able to stay behind.[60] Navajo miners were paid less than miners from off-reservation, well below minimum wage.[64][65] Until radon exposure safety standards were imposed by the Secretary of Labor Willard Wirtz over the objections of the Atomic Energy Commission and the uranium mining industry in June, 1967,[66][67] mines lacked ventilation, exposing workers to radon.

Widows of mine workers met to discuss their grief; they started a grassroots movement that eventually reached the Congressional floor.[21]

The Church Rock uranium mill spill raised claims that race was a factor in the federal government's paying little attention to the disaster:

When there was a relatively minor problem at Three Mile Island in Pennsylvania, the entire attention of the Nation was focused on this location and the Federal and State assistance brought to bear to deal with it was extraordinary. When the largest release of radioactive material in the history of the United States occurs in Navajo country, however, the attention paid to it by the Federal and State authorities is minimal at best.[68]

— Peter MacDonald, Chairman of the Navajo Nation

Community involvement and response

Forgotten People

Black Falls water project, which involved collaboration with the US EPA to provide clean drinking water and educational outreach for the Black Falls community which was affected by uranium mining. FP attributes the success of Black Falls with the evolution "from a needs-based or dependency approach to the agencies into an assumption of full responsibility for their own development." The Black Falls community was able to decide upon their own solutions for their water problems. Their efforts were coordinated by FP and funded by the US EPA. Forgotten People represents an evolving grassroots community which is moving simply from organizing to actually empowering residents to take their development into their own hands.[70]

Forgotten People also gathers and displays pertinent public records for a variety of issues facing the Navajo on their website. For their campaigns against uranium mining, their website displays all official responses US attempts at relaxing uranium restrictions on Navajo territory. FP also preserves the response of the President of the Navajo Nation in response to proposals for uranium mining near the

Joe Shirley, Jr., signed the Diné Natural Resources Protection Act which banned uranium mining and processing on Navajo land. After signing the law, President Shirley stated, "As long as there are no answers to cancer, we shouldn't have uranium mining on the Navajo Nation. I believe the powers that be committed genocide on Navajo land by allowing uranium mining."[71][72]

Diné Citizens Against Ruining our Environment (Diné CARE), established in 1988 as a grassroots organization, aims to give citizens of the Navajo Nation a voice to protect their environment, culture, and community. The expansion of the organization, over the years, allows for individuals within the Navajo community to share their experiences and build a network of people dedicated to the preservation of the Navajo land and resources. Membership is free and involves being an active advocate for the community that the member lives in. Projects and campaigns that Dine' CARE works on are financed by grant money.[73] One of the project that Dine' CARE works on is the Navajo Radiation Victims Project. This project helps regions impacted by nuclear waste from uranium mining by visiting communities and gaining first hand accounts from victims. Earl Tulley, who is now Vice President of Dine' Care, believes the project helps all victims of uranium radiation exposure, native or non-native, get the compensation and help that they need.[73] The organization fights to clean up impacted areas and prevent any future mining on Navajo land. The most notable success for the project was the amendment of the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act (RECA) in 2000.[74] Dine' CARE helped create the Western States RECA Reform Coalition to expand the scope of compensation for victims not only by extending the geographic regions and time periods covered, but also by adding two new occupational claimants and compensable diseases.[75]  

Enduring impact

Many residents of the Navajo Nation have anxiety and concerns about the future because of large amounts of radioactive waste remaining. One Navajo Elder explains: "We, the elderlies, that resides around here don't know what was good and worst about the uranium. There were several deaths in this area that was affected by radiation or cancers. We need help. I lost my wife last year [to cancer] and now I am 87 years. My wife would have been 70 years old which made a lot of difference. I am lonely and can't get anywhere without her help. I was hurted and miserable."

water contamination and contamination of rocks which many residents used to build their houses, continue to be problems.[77]

A 1995 report published by American Public Health Association found: "excess mortality rates for lung cancer, pneumoconioses and other respiratory diseases, and tuberculosis for Navajo uranium miners. Increasing duration of exposure to underground uranium mining was associated with increased mortality risk for all three diseases… The most important long-term mortality risks for the Navajo uranium miners continue to be lung cancer and pneumoconioses and other nonmalignant respiratory diseases." That is to say, not stomach cancer, which the Navajo people naturally have a higher rate of experiencing than the national US average.[34] The descendants of mining families continue to have extremely high rates of ovarian and testicular cancer.

[78]

The enduring effect of uranium mining continues to contaminate the soil and endanger survival of wild plants. Additionally, livestock's dependency on clean food and water sources that are being slowly lost, and that may not recover, casts uncertainty on the continuity of the Navajo's pastoral lifestyle.[79]

Scientific consensus has not been reached about the gravity of the public health threat caused by uranium contamination of groundwater on the Navajo Nation.[80] However, uranium is present in a substantial portion of unregulated groundwater sources used for human consumption.[81][82] The lack of consensus on the risk that this poses to the Navajo may indicate a research deficit that is also seen in other Native American communities.[80] However, a significant connection between proximity to an abandoned uranium mine and presence of uranium (and arsenic) in groundwater wells has been made, no matter if the elements occur naturally or are a result of the mining process.[81] Studies have shown an autoimmune response in some Navajos from uranium mine waste that may indicate a risk for people with autoimmune diseases, which are more prevalent in Native Americans.[80] Chronic lack of access to regulated water sources means that many Navajo people may be drinking from uranium and arsenic-contaminated water.

Clean-up efforts

Since 1994, the

nuclear waste.[83] In 2008, the EPA implemented a five-year cleanup plan, focusing on the most pressing issues: contaminated water and structures. The EPA estimates that 30% of all Navajo people lack access to uncontaminated drinking water.[83]

The EPA is targeting 500 abandoned uranium mills as another part of their five-year cleanup plan, with the goal of ridding the area of nuclear waste.[83] Its priority was identification of contaminated water sources and structures; many of the latter have been destroyed and removed. In 2011, it completed a multi-year project of removing 20,000 cubic yards of contaminated earth out of the reservation, near the Skyline Mine, to controlled storage on the plateau.[84]

In 2017, a $600 million settlement attempts to clean up 94 abandoned uranium mines.[85]

The EPA and NNEPA prioritized 46 mines (called priority mines) based on gamma radiation levels, proximity to homes and potential for water contamination identified in preliminary assessments documented in the EPA Site Screen Reports. Detailed cleanup investigations will be conducted at these mines by the end of 2019. All documents can be found here.[86]

All 46 priority mines are in the assessment phase which includes biological and cultural surveys, radiation scanning, and soil and water sampling. These assessments help to determine the extent of contamination. The assessment work at the 46 priority mines will be documented in Removal Site Evaluation reports which will be completed by the end of 2019. These reports will be shared with communities and made available on this website.[87]

The federal government seeks proposals from businesses to clean up abandoned uranium mines on the Navajo Nation. $220 million available to small businesses to clean up Navajo uranium mines. The funding comes from a $1.7 billion settlement with Tronox, the successor of Kerr-McGee, a company that mined the region. During the Cold War companies extracted nearly 30 million tons of uranium from Navajo land. The EPA says it has funding to assess and clean up 220 of the 520 abandoned mines. The Request for Proposal can be found at www.fedconnect.net in the “Public Opportunities” section by searching Reference Number 68HE0918R0014. Contract proposals will be accepted through May 28, 2019.[88]

Residents of the Red Water Pond Road area have requested relocation to a new, off-grid village to be located on Standing Black Tree Mesa while cleanup progresses on the Northeast Church Rock Mine Superfund site, as an alternative to the EPA-proposed relocation of residents to Gallup.[89]

In popular culture

In the 2020s, reggae rock band Tha 'Yoties (led by Hopi/Tewa edutainer Ed Kabotie) performed and released music about uranium mining on Navajo lands during their national tours.[90]

See also

References

  1. PMID 12197966
    .
  2. ^ Herald, Patrick (November 7, 2017). "Navajos relate cultural, spiritual wounds from spill from Gold King Mine spill". The Durango Herald. Retrieved February 1, 2022.
  3. ^
    ISBN 1416594833
  4. ^ US EPA, REG 09 (2016-06-15). "Providing Safe Drinking Water in Areas with Abandoned Uranium Mines". www.epa.gov. Retrieved 2022-03-01.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  5. ^ US EPA, REG 09 (2016-06-30). "Water Sampling Results in the Navajo Nation". www.epa.gov. Retrieved 2022-03-01.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  6. ^ US EPA, OW (2015-10-13). "Radionuclides Rule". www.epa.gov. Retrieved 2022-03-01.
  7. ^ "Uranium Health Effects". web.evs.anl.gov. Retrieved 2022-03-01.
  8. PMID 17332739
    .
  9. ^ "Navajo Nation Cleanup". epa.gov. 16 February 2016.
  10. ^ "A peril that dwelt among the Navajos". Los Angeles Times. 2006-11-19. Retrieved 2012-05-18.
  11. ^ Diep, Francie (December 30, 2010). "Abandoned Uranium Mines: An 'Overwhelming Problem' in the Navajo Nation". Scientific American.
  12. ^ Leslie Macmillan (March 31, 2012). "Uranium Mines Dot Navajo Land, Neglected and Still Perilous". New York Times.
  13. ^ "Human rights panel to hear Navajo uranium contamination case". AP NEWS. 2021-10-21. Retrieved 2022-03-28.
  14. ^ http://www.peoplesworld.org/article/rare-disease-suddenly-arises-on-navajo-reservation/ review of documentary "Sun Kissed"
  15. ^ "Radiation Exposure Compensation Act amendments on agenda". Farmington Daily Times.
  16. ^ "Home". www.aml.navajo-nsn.gov.
  17. ^ Pasternak, Judy (2006-11-19). "A peril that dwelt among the Navajos". Los Angeles Times.
  18. ^ U.S. EPA, Radiation Protection, "Uranium Mining Waste," 30 August 2012 Web.4 December 2012, http://www.epa.gov/radiation/tenorm/uranium.html
  19. ^ Uranium Mining and Extraction Processes in the United States, Figure 2.1. Mines and Other Locations with Uranium in the Western U.S. http://www.epa.gov/radiation/docs/tenorm/402-r-08-005-voli/402-r-08-005-v1-ch2.pdf
  20. ^ Laws We Use (Summaries): 1978 – Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act (42 USC 2022 et seq.), EPA, retrieved December 16, 2012
  21. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m Brugge, Doug, Timothy Benally, and Esther Yazzie-Lewis. The Navajo People and Uranium Mining, Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press, 2006
  22. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t Dawson, Susan E, and Gary E Madsen. "Uranium Mine Workers, Atomic Downwinders, and the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act." In Half Lives & Half-Truths: Confronting the Radioactive Legacies of the Cold War, pp. 117–143. Santa Fe: School For Advanced Research, 2007
  23. ^ a b Fettus, Geoffry H.; Matthew G. Mckinzie (March 2012). "Nuclear Fuel's Dirty Beginnings: Environmental Damage and Public Health Risks From Uranium Mining in the American West" (PDF). National Resources Defense Council. Retrieved 29 April 2014.
  24. ^ a b Pasternak, Judy (November 19, 2006). "A peril that dwelt among the Navajos". Los Angeles Times.
  25. ^ Pasternak, Judy (2010). Yellow Dirt: An American Story of a Poisoned Land and a People Betrayed. New York: Free Press.
  26. ISBN 978-0-8263-3778-8
    .
  27. ISBN 978-1-4165-9482-6
    .
  28. PMID 17666688
    .
  29. ^ a b Brendan Giusti, "Radiation Spill in Church Rock Still Haunts 30 Years Later", The Daily Times (Farmington, New Mexico), July 16, 2009, Section: Local
  30. ISBN 0826338836
  31. ^
    PMID 17666688
    .
  32. ^ Chris Shuey, MPH "The Puerco River: Where Did the Water Go?" Archived 2012-02-26 at the Wayback Machine, Southwest Research and Information Center, 1986
  33. PMID 12197966
    .
  34. ^
    PMID 7702118
    .
  35. ^ Dan Frosch (July 26, 2009). "Uranium Contamination Haunts Navajo Country". New York Times.
  36. ^
    S2CID 34065101
    .
  37. PMID 11485872
    .
  38. PMID 21979550
    .
  39. ^
    PMID 22561334
    .
  40. ^ United States Department of Justice. Radiation Exposure Compensation Program, About the Program. November 6, 2009. http://www.justice.gov/civil/torts/const/reca/about.htm Archived 2009-12-12 at the Wayback Machine (accessed October 28, 2009).
  41. ^ United States Government Accountability Office. "United States Government Accountability Office." September 7, 2007. www.gao.gov/new.items/d071037r.pdf – (accessed October 28, 2009).
  42. ^ Department of Justice Civil Division, "Radiation Exposure Compensation System", Radiation Exposure Compensation Program, 17 November 2009 (accessed November 17, 2009).
  43. ^ "Abandoned Uranium Mines | Addressing Uranium Contamination on the Navajo Nation | Superfund | Pacific Southwest | US EPA". www.epa.gov. 29 January 2013. Retrieved 2015-08-16.
  44. ^ a b "Site Profile – Skyline Abandoned Uranium Mine (AUM) – EPA OSC Response". response.epa.gov.
  45. ^ "Northeast Church Rock Mine | Addressing Uranium Contamination on the Navajo Nation | Superfund | Pacific Southwest | US EPA". www.epa.gov. 29 January 2013. Retrieved 2015-08-16.
  46. ^ "Navajo Nation Cleanup". epa.gov. 16 February 2016.
  47. ^ "Navajo Nation uranium cleanup". www.epa.gov. 16 February 2016.
  48. ^ "Supefunds negotiation". www.epa.gov. 3 May 2013.
  49. ^ "Superfund". Retrieved 9 May 2012.
  50. ^ "Addressing Uranium Contamination in the Navajo Nation". Retrieved 9 May 2012.
  51. ^ "U.S. EPA to Perform Helicopter Survey of Abandoned Uranium Mines in the Oljato Area" (PDF). Retrieved 9 May 2012.
  52. ^ "Health and Environmental Impacts of Uranium Contamination in the Navajo Nation Five-Year Plan" (PDF). Retrieved 9 May 2012.
  53. ^ "Health and Environmental Impacts of Uranium Contamination in the Navajo NationEPA Progress in Implementing a 5-Year Cleanup Plan" (PDF). Retrieved 9 May 2012.
  54. ^ "National Priorities List". Retrieved 9 May 2012.
  55. ^ "NNEPA". Navajonationepa.org. Retrieved 2012-05-18.
  56. ^ Leslie Macmillan (March 31, 2012). "Uranium Mines Dot Navajo Land, Neglected and Still Perilous". New York Times.
  57. ^ Francie Diep (December 30, 2010). "Abandoned Uranium Mines: An "Overwhelming Problem" in the Navajo Nation". Scientific American.
  58. ^ "A peril that dwelt among the Navajos". Los Angeles Times. 2006-11-19. Retrieved 2012-05-18.
  59. ^ "EPA Revisits Permit for What Could Be First in New Wave of Uranium Mines". KUNM. 2012-05-09. Retrieved 2012-05-18.
  60. ^ a b c d e Dawson, Susan E. "Navajo Uranium Workers and the Effects of Occupational Illnesses: A Case Study," Human Organization Vol. 51, number 4, 1992: 389–97.
  61. ^ a b Herald, Patrick (November 7, 2017). "Navajos relate cultural, spiritual wounds from spill from Gold King Mine spill". The Durango Herald. Retrieved 1 February 2022.
  62. ^ a b "Tó Éí Ííńá (Water is Life): The impact of the Gold Mine Spill on the Navajo Nation". Resource Media. 2015-09-02. Retrieved 2022-02-17.
  63. ^ US EPA, REG 08 (2015-08-10). "Federal Tort Claims Act Information". www.epa.gov. Retrieved 2022-02-17.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  64. ^ Eichstaedt 1994, p. 38.
  65. ^ Kuletz, Valerie (1998). The Tainted Desert. New York: Routledge. p. 25.
  66. ISBN 978-1416594826
    .
  67. ^ Eichstaedt, Peter (1994). If You Poison Us: Uranium and Native Americans. Santa Fe, NM: Red Crane Books. pp. 71, 74.
  68. ^ Mill Tailings Dam Break at Church Rock, New Mexico, US Congress, House Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs, Subcommittee on Energy and the Environment, October 22, 1979
  69. ^ "Forgotten People | News, Events, and Activism concerning the former Bennett Freeze". Forgottennavajopeople.org. Retrieved 2012-05-18.
  70. ^ "Black Falls Safe Drinking Water". Forgotten People: Dine Be na hil naa.
  71. ^ "About Forgotten People: Dine Bé ná hil naa". Forgotten People. Retrieved 12 February 2022.
  72. ^ Shirley, Joe. "Navajo Nation President Joe Shirley, Jr. signs Dine Natural Resources Protection Act of 2005 New law bans uranium mining, processing throughout Navajo Nation" (PDF). Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Retrieved 12 February 2022.
  73. ^ a b "About Us". Dine-care. Retrieved 2022-04-03.
  74. ^ "Dine Care, Arizona | Indigenous Environmental Network". www.ienearth.org. 2016-01-29. Retrieved 2022-04-03.
  75. ^ Office, U. S. Government Accountability. "Radiation Exposure Compensation Act: Program Status". www.gao.gov. Retrieved 2022-04-03.
  76. ^ Diep, Francie (December 30, 2010). "Abandoned Uranium Mines: An 'Overwhelming Problem' in the Navajo Nation". Scientific American.
  77. ^ "Uranium contamination at Navajo Reservation", New York Times, 27 July 2009
  78. ISBN 978-0-8166-9267-5
    .
  79. PMID 21979550
    .
  80. ^
    PMID 33769848
    .
  81. ^
    PMID 28553666
    .
  82. S2CID 75896153
    .
  83. ^ a b c United States Environmental Protection Agency. Addressing Uranium Contamination in Navajo Nation. October 7, 2009. http://www.epa.gov/region09/superfund/navajo-nation/index.html (accessed November 17, 2009)
  84. ^ Felicia Fonseca, "Navajo woman helps prompt uranium mine cleanup", Associated Press, carried in Houston Chronicle, 5 September 2011, accessed 5 October 2011
  85. ^ "Feds: Agreement reached to clean up abandoned uranium mines on Navajo Nation". Arizona Daily Sun. 18 January 2017. Retrieved 2 February 2017.
  86. ^ "Priority Mines". www.epa.gov. 28 June 2016.
  87. ^ "Site Screen Reports". www.epa.gov. 21 March 2017.
  88. ^ "Funding for Clean-up https://www.epa.gov/newsreleases/us-epa-announces-contract-opportunities-worth-220-million-navajo-area-uranium-mine". www.epa.gov. 21 February 2022. {{cite web}}: External link in |title= (help)
  89. ^ Ford, Will (January 18, 2020). "A radioactive legacy haunts this Navajo village, which fears a fractured future". Washington Post. Retrieved 2020-01-18.
  90. ^ Mimiaga, Jim. "Dolores hosts reggae band with a Native American message". The Journal. Retrieved 2023-10-03.

External links

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Uranium_mining_and_the_Navajo_people&oldid=1214590794"