Wikipedia is a Paradise for all who want to dress as Spider-Man. Only uncivil editors dare to tell them that it may be uncool and awkward. Others will say that the costume goes nicely with their hairy ears.
Florence Foster Jenkins. In real life, she was mocked for her strikingly poor singing ability. If she had been a wikipedia editor, her patience and ability to sing songs in her native language would have been adored by her peers.
Frankenstein's monster in the classic 1930s film version. In real life, he would be regarded with abomination. In wikipedian environment, an article fabricated from parts of other articles is always praised as a great editorial masterpiece.
Touch-me-not: you can never say a wikipedian editor that their contribution to our project does not worth shit. You must let them suffer contributing to our project uselessly for years.
Vladimir Lenin before his death. Comrade Lenin was a humane and benign man of state: he caressed the face of the children playing in his garden although he could have ordered their execution. In wikipedian environment, you must be grateful if an administrator only warned you without a hearing because he could have placed a topic ban on you.
The Blind Leading the Blind by Pieter Bruegel the Elder, 1568
For your contributions to bring Voivode of Transylvania to Good Article status. Thanks, and keep up the good work! -- Khazar2 (talk) 19:46, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
Order of the Seven Chieftains third class
For the A-Team: Álmos, Árpád, Zoltán, Fajsz, Taksony and Géza. Very good job! :) Norden1990 (talk) 12:23, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello Borsoka, Eduemoni has given you a shining smiling star! You see, these things promote WikiLove and hopefully this has made your day better. Spread the Shining Smiling Star whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or someone putting up with some stick at this time. Enjoy! Eduemoni↑talk↓ 13:16, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
For your very professional improvement of several articles about early Moravian/Slovak history, such as
talk
) 22:53, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
The Feather Barnstar
For your truly professional contributions and your efforts of bringing articles to good article status. Well done! KœrteFa{ταλκ} 16:12, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
For your contributions to bring Andrew II of Hungary to Good Article status. Thanks, and keep up the good work! — ₳aron 09:15, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
The Royalty and Nobility Barnstar
For your extensive contributions to numerous articles on historical kings, queens and other assorted royalty and nobility figures, I, Piotrus, present you with The Royalty's Barnstar. Please keep up the wonderful work! Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:38, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
The Editor's Barnstar
you deserve this for your hard and excellent work on Jadwiga of Poland Volunteer Marek 06:45, 12 September 2015 (UTC) 03:53, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
The Writer's Barnstar
For your quality improvement efforts to the article Ladislaus IV of Hungary. Thanks to your hard work, the article is has now passed the GA review! Best, -- Notecardforfree (talk) 17:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
history and royalty articles
Thank you for your tireless efforts to write quality articles related to European history, royalty and nobility. This may have come late, but has only become better deserved, for you are an awesome Wikipedian!
The Special Barnstar
For your work in FA/GA throughout the years, here is this barnstar. I came across your page after reading through
Dear Borsoka, I award you The Christianity Barnstar for all your hard work in WikiProject Christianity-related articles, especially your recent creation of Kolozsmonostor Abbey. Keep up the good work! Your efforts are making a difference here! With regards, AnupamTalk 05:02, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
7&6=thirteen (☎) has given you a Dobos torte to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it.
To give a Dobos torte and spread the WikiLove, just place {{subst:Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.
As nominated by your peers as part of the 2017 Military History Newcomer of the Year Award process, you have been highlighted as an editor who has contributed significantly to the Military history project in 2017. As such, I hereby award you these Wikichevrons. Thank you for your efforts in 2017. AustralianRupert (talk) 02:05, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
The Epic Barnstar
For your work on Charles I of Anjou you are hereby awarded The Epic Barnstar. Congrats! TomStar81 (Talk) 19:40, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
Thank you for your hard work on Stefan Dragutin, I appreciate it. I look forward to your future works. Maybe Stefan Konstantin would be interesting for you? Congratulations! Sadkσ(talk is cheap) 20:14, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the The Milhist reviewing award (1 stripe) for participating in 2 reviews between January and March 2021. Peacemaker67 (talk) via MilHistBot (talk) 23:08, 5 June 2021 (UTC) Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste {{WPMILHIST Review alerts}} to your user space
Editor of the Week
Your ongoing efforts to improve the encyclopedia have not gone unnoticed: You have been selected as
Wikipedia Editor Retention Project
)
The Original Barnstar
For bringing an article on such a broad period of history as Hungarian nobility to the status of FA. A monumentally impressive accomplishment. Thank you for your work! —Compassionate727(T·C) 14:25, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
The Teamwork Barnstar
Thank you so much for your GA review of The Holocaust article. It's a daunting task to review an article with such a broad scope, not to mention the subject matter. (t · c) buidhe 03:12, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
Wikipedia is a Paradise for all who want to dress as Spider-Man. Only uncivil editors dare to tell them that it may be uncool and awkward. Others will say that the costume goes nicely with their hairy ears.
Florence Foster Jenkins. In real life, she was mocked for her strikingly poor singing ability. If she had been a wikipedia editor, her patience and ability to sing songs in her native language would have been adored by her peers.
Frankenstein's monster in the classic 1930s film version. In real life, he would be regarded with abomination. In wikipedian environment, an article fabricated from parts of other articles is always praised as a great editorial masterpiece.
Touch-me-not: you can never say a wikipedian editor that their contribution to our project does not worth shit. You must let them suffer contributing to our project uselessly for years.
Vladimir Lenin before his death. Comrade Lenin was a humane and benign man of state: he caressed the face of the children playing in his garden although he could have ordered their execution. In wikipedian environment, you must be grateful if an administrator only warned you without a hearing because he could have placed a topic ban on you.
The Blind Leading the Blind by Pieter Bruegel the Elder, 1568
.jpg)
.jpg)
