User talk:BilboBeggins

Hello, I'm Amberrock. I noticed that you recently removed content from The 100 (TV series) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.—♦♦ AMBER^(ЯʘCK) 21:36, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Кирилл С1

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username TomCat4680 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I’ve

1. Edit the page
2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. Click the Publish changes button.

But, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|TomCat4680}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

TomCat4680 (talk) 12:49, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ronald Gutiérrez (referee) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ronald Gutiérrez (referee) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:00, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On 2 June 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Samuel E. Wright, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai (talk) 23:29, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Wayne Duvall. Thanks! Tame (talk) 19:55, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• talk) 14:01, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tamingimpala was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject

independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid

when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

The sources that are provided do not show that the subject is worthy of an article, that is, the sources do mention the subject, but it fails significant coverage. Significant coverage' means that sources address the subject directly in detail, so no original research is needed to extract the content. Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention but it need not be the main topic of the source material.

Moreover, the roles that he played in movies are very small roles, even many of them are uncredited. Also the video games section do not have any reference to support the claims. Additional voiceover role does not make anyone notable.

This article can only be accepted if the subject has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is only then presumed to satisfy the inclusion criteria for a stand-alone article or stand-alone list.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Wayne Duvall and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Wayne Duvall, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tame (talk) 14:54, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Кирилл С1! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Tame (talk) 14:54, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• "Moreover, the roles that he played in movies are very small roles, even many of them are uncredited." - this is not the case, the only his uncredited role is in Quiet Place 2, and ironically, it has coverage: [2] (a paragraph, which is good combined with other sources), so it is essentially cameo. These were not very small roles, see Edge of Darkness, O Brother. Had supporting role in at least several Academy award nominated films and had multiple recurring roles in TV series, by Wikipedia standards this is more than enough. Did you thoroughly analyse his filmography - I do not understand this "Additional voiceover role does not make anyone notable" remark (voice roles is not remaotely close to his best, or better known roles such as District or Pearson recurring role, or In the valley of Ellah significant role, or others.
  talk) 15:24, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]

  @

  Кирилл С1, by "the roles that he played in movies are very small roles, even many of them are uncredited." I referred to the existing articles on these movies in Wikipedia. While there is some mention of him in several articles of these movies, some of the articles themselves need additional references. In films database webpages the camera personels are even credited, that do not make them notable. "Did you thoroughly analyse his filmography". In any case, my review was based on the references and info that were present in the draft, linking an article from Screenrant website in this talk page is not gonna do anything. You should find more reliable and independent sources that mentions the subject significantly (not just trivial mention), and add them in the draft, then resubmit. Surely I or another reviewer might accept it if it then seems to meet the requirements. -- Tame (talk) 06:00, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply

  ]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SamHolt6 was:

This submission appears to

independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability

of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lindsey Gort and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Lindsey Gort, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SamHolt6 (talk) 14:36, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Apart from maybe second sentence in career section, I don't see any advertising - I already rewrote in neutral way. I don't think that writing that Catrall having congratulated her makes it unencyclopedic. It's not different to hundreds of other articles on actors where their roles are listed. Purely the facts are given.
  talk) 14:56, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply
  ]

On 4 February 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Leonid Kuravlyov, which you nominated and updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 01:05, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Кирилл С1

Thank you for creating Jack Kehler.

Good start!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:32, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Кирилл С1

Thank you for creating Lina Roessler.

This needs some improvement to references. At the moment, the article is heavily dependent upon citations focused upon interviews which may be regarded as primary sources (see

WP:RS

).

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Paul W}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Paul W (talk) 11:02, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

• It meets notability guidelines per WP:DIRECTOR - her work was reviewed. There is coverage on her.
  talk) 16:16, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply
  ]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tommy Lane (actor), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Flipper.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MurielMary was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject

independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid

when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
  Draft:Lina Roessler
  and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MurielMary (talk) 08:47, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

[3] I giggled. --Jayron32 19:42, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Christmas Next Door is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christmas Next Door until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

DonaldD23 talk to me 11:51, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

I understand that animals can die, but plants can't die.

talk) 22:16, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

I have read this small discussion and I don't see consensus for posting plants.

talk) 22:22, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

That's as may be, but previous discussions have covered plant life. And of course plants can die - they don't live forever (nothing does). You are welcome to bring the subject up once more at Talk:Deaths in 2023, but I can assure you that further removals of this type will always be reverted (not just by myself but by other regular editors familiar with the consensus on living organisms dying), until such time as consensus shifts to exclude them. Thanks. Ref ^(chew)(do) 22:57, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have just opened a new section at Talk:Deaths in 2023 dealing with plants in the Deaths list when there is already a discussion in progress on that page. Post your opinions there, and please stop being so disruptive. Ref ^(chew)(do) 18:24, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You told me to "bring the subject up once more at Talk:Deaths in 2023". It's obvious that I didn't see the other topic because I saw only names of topics and only had brief glance at them and didn't recognise that this was already open.

talk) 19:14, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Well, I've fixed the situation by combining the two sections, okay? Ref ^(chew)(do) 20:43, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by 14 novembre were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Derek Webster (actor)

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
  Draft:Derek Webster (actor)
  and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

14 novembre (talk) 🇮🇹 09:14, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Derek Webster (actor), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

14 novembre (talk) 🇮🇹 15:17, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Derek Webster (actor) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Derek Webster (actor) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

UtherSRG (talk) 15:49, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]