User talk:Amir Ghandi

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:23, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On 28 January 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article She'r-e Nimaa'i, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Nima Yooshij was threatened with death for presenting his school of poetry, She'r-e Nimaa'i? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/She'r-e Nimaa'i. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, She'r-e Nimaa'i), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 12:02, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On 30 January 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Zabân-e Pâk, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the treatise Zabân-e Pâk, written by Ahmad Kasravi, was one of the first works that sought to suggest refinements to the Persian language? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Zabân-e Pâk. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Zabân-e Pâk), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Amir Ghandi. You have new messages at Template:Did you know nominations/Azari or the Ancient Language of Azerbaijan.
Message added 06:37, 4 February 2021 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article

criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of David Eppstein -- David Eppstein (talk) 07:41, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply

The article The Forgotten Kings you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:The Forgotten Kings for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of David Eppstein -- David Eppstein (talk) 08:22, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for joining Wikipedia: WikiProject Mysticism. Having looked at your user page, I would guess you are from Iran, so I wonder whether you would be interested in improving coverage of the articles in Wikipedia to do with Sufism? Rollo August (talk) 20:27, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• @Rollo August:. Hello! i think there is a misunderstanding, because i never joined WikiProjedct Mysticism. I'm not even a Muslim, let alone a Sufi.Amir Ghandi (talk) 21:03, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• @Rollo August:. oh! i now see it, i don't recall why i joined.Amir Ghandi (talk) 21:05, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Amir Ghandi. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{

ygm}} template.Amir Ghandi (talk) 22:46, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article

criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Aven13 -- Aven13 (talk) 14:40, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply

The article Khosrow Mirza you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Khosrow Mirza for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Aven13 -- Aven13 (talk) 14:41, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On

Fars, was compared to the courts of Ottoman sultans due to its large and extravagant festivals? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Hossein Ali Mirza. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Hossein Ali Mirza), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page

.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article

criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cerebellum -- Cerebellum (talk) 10:41, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply

The article

]

A barnstar for you!

The Special Barnstar

I love your article choice and your very well writing , i thinking that your activity in English Wikipedia is helpful for intellectual movement in Iran and other countries, please writing more about Persian and Iranian literature , culture , music , art and your activity is changing face of iran and Iranian people in the world , to the lovey and peaceful people and civilization ... Thank you so much ❤️🌹 AdiliArts (talk) 13:44, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

thank you dear Adili, i'm realy honoured and i assure you i won't end my activity in English wikipedia. Amir Ghandi (talk) 14:04, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Faramosh Khaneh, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Cerebellum (talk) 10:38, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article

criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Amitchell125 -- Amitchell125 (talk) 20:02, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply

The article Hossein Ali Mirza you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Hossein Ali Mirza for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Amitchell125 -- Amitchell125 (talk) 15:42, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article

The article

The article

Hello, Amir Ghandi. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Hossein Ali Mirza at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Tdslk (talk) 20:22, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ops, sorry mate, I didn't realize User:Amir Ghandi/sandbox10 was still a sandbox, thought it was a created article. Didn't mean to interfere. --HistoryofIran (talk) 22:34, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• @HistoryofIran: no problem i actually appreciate it, you see i write the articles in my sandbox then move the Content to the article on the main page. it's easier for me. Amir Ghandi (talk) 22:39, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I see, keep up the good work! --HistoryofIran (talk) 23:02, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - per this disclosure on fa.wikipedia, could you confirm you are in fact Amirhosein Izadi? ~TNT (she/they • talk) 12:28, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• @TheresNoTime: yes, i'm gonna be block, right? Amir Ghandi (talk) 12:44, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Thank you for being honest, I appreciate that. Yes, I am going to block this account - you've been around long enough to know you're not allowed to create another account to evade a block. I strongly recommend you review the guide to appealing blocks. For reference, your block was discussed here ~TNT (she/they • talk) 12:55, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. ~TNT (she/they • talk) 12:56, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Amir Ghandi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

i must request at my first account but i have lost its password. for the actual request, my behaviour in my first account (Amirhosein Izadi) was indeed unconstructive and i regret what i did two years ago. I also agree that creating this account was wrong, however i honestly didn't use it for troll editing, i learned from my past and tried to avoid my destruction behaviour and tried to contribute. as you can see that i have two GA articles and i'm here to continue this path. thanks. Amir Ghandi (talk) 13:46, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

As your previous account was blocked due to a community discussion, no administrator can unilaterally lift the block. Even if I believe that you lost the password to that account, you must still address the reasons for that account being blocked(per this discussion). I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 09:40, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

its been five days since i posted my request, i'd like to know why no one is answering me.Amir Ghandi (talk) 19:12, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Emphasized on the fundamental policy Wikipedia:Assume good faith, I supports your appeal because you edits were positive and constructive to this collaborative encyclopedia. Wingwatchers (talk) 04:46, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot: so can i have another request? Amir Ghandi (talk) 09:58, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you may make another request. 331dot (talk) 12:43, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Amir Ghandi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

my previous account (

Wikipedia:Appealing blocks and even if i was, i had already lost my password to the previous account. my edits on this account could prove that i did not continue destructive edits as i have two GA articles and surely will maintain this path if i get unblocked. Amir Ghandi (talk

) 10:26 am, 27 September 2021, Monday (22 days ago) (UTC+2)

Accept reason:

Accepted per the

WP:AN discussion. Vanjagenije (talk) 14:04, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

• Hi Amir, this will ultimately need to go to
  WP:AN for Community review, and will do so on request (it's sufficient improvement over the last one that I won't unilaterally close it). If there's any additions you would want to include for the broader community, or proposals you want to get ahead of by agreeing to in advance, please do so and then let me know when you'd like me to take it to AN. Nosebagbear (talk) 11:57, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]
  • @Nosebagbear: nothing in particular to add. Amir Ghandi (talk) 12:20, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • Just an FYI that I should be processing this onto AN tonight - apologies for the delay Nosebagbear (talk) 09:09, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Checkuser needed Can a Checkuser confirm that this person have been indeed using only this single account since abandoning the previous (blocked) account? Vanjagenije (talk) 00:45, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Checkuser note: Looks OK to progress to the next stage. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 17:08, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

hi. i just wanted to know that is there any further progress in my case? honestly after over 10 days, its becoming frustrating. Amir Ghandi (talk) 00:52, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion on your case is open here: Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#Unblock_request_by_Amir_Ghandi/Amirhosein_Izadi. Vanjagenije (talk) 11:46, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@TheresNoTime and Nosebagbear: Since no objections were raised in 14 days, do you agree to unblock? Vanjagenije (talk) 13:23, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Vanjagenije: Wholeheartedly support an unblock ~TheresNoTime ^{(to chat)} 13:45, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Since you've been indeffed for block evasion and we have many other requests, your copyedit requests have been declined until you're back in good standing. Please see the

Hello, Amir Ghandi. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Aliqoli Mirza Qajar at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Tdslk (talk) 05:40, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for the opportunity to review that interesting article! On remaining question I have is whether to refer to the subject as "Ali Mirza" or "Aliqoli Mirza", because the article switches between the two names. I don't know if one would be considered more correct, but it would be good to use one name consistently in the article. Regards, Tdslk (talk) 05:40, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

* @Tdslk: Thanks for your fast work. regarding the names personally i think Aliqoli is more thorough.Amir Ghandi (talk) 06:02, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article

criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Z1720 -- Z1720 (talk) 01:21, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply

The article

The article Hajji Ebrahim Shirazi you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Hajji Ebrahim Shirazi for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Z1720 -- Z1720 (talk) 03:41, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article

criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Amitchell125 -- Amitchell125 (talk) 08:40, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply

criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jens Lallensack -- Jens Lallensack (talk) 10:21, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply

The article Tahmasp I you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Tahmasp I for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Amitchell125 -- Amitchell125 (talk) 12:01, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article

criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Most Comfortable Chair -- The Most Comfortable Chair (talk) 14:21, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply

The article Sayf ol-Dowleh you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Sayf ol-Dowleh for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Most Comfortable Chair -- The Most Comfortable Chair (talk) 04:41, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article

]

Khosrow Mirza

Hello, Amir Ghandi. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Khosrow Mirza at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle☿gab 03:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tahmasp I copyedit

Hello, Amir Ghandi. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Tahmasp I at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Good luck with GA and all the best, Miniapolis 20:57, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article

criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ganesha811 -- Ganesha811 (talk) 19:40, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply

The article Aliqoli Mirza Qajar you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Aliqoli Mirza Qajar for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ganesha811 -- Ganesha811 (talk) 20:01, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Amir Ghandi. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Hajji Ebrahim Shirazi at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle☿gab 02:53, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article

]

A barnstar for you!

	The Writer's Barnstar
	Thank you for your hard work! HistoryofIran (talk) 01:04, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@HistoryofIran:, thank you for being a great fellow author. Amir Ghandi (talk) 04:11, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from https://doi.org/10.1080/00210860108701997, which is not released under a compatible license. Copying text directly from a source is a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Content you add to Wikipedia should be written in your own words. Please let me know if you have any questions. — Diannaa (talk) 13:55, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article

criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Amitchell125 -- Amitchell125 (talk) 08:01, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply

The article

The article Abbas II of Persia you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Abbas II of Persia for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Amitchell125 -- Amitchell125 (talk) 12:41, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On

a war with the Mughal Empire in 1649 to recover the city of Kandahar? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Abbas II of Persia. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Abbas II of Persia), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page

.

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

culture of Iran

Thank you for quality articles around minds and culture of Persia and Iran such as Iranian Enlightenment, Abbas II of Persia, Hossein Ali Mirza, Jeyran (wife of Naser al-Din Shah) and Zabân-e Pâk, for going for even higher quality, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

You are recipient no.

Aww, thank you! Amir Ghandi (talk) 08:11, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article

criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Amitchell125 -- Amitchell125 (talk) 07:40, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply

The article

The article Ismail II you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Ismail II for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Amitchell125 -- Amitchell125 (talk) 14:21, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article

criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Pharaoh Thutmose III -- Pharaoh Thutmose III (talk) 00:40, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Mohammad Shah Qajar

Hello, Amir Ghandi. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Mohammad Shah Qajar at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle☿gab 18:30, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Resource Exchange request status?

If you never received the two chapters of Quinn

@Worldbruce; Sorry, completely forgot; Sent you an email now Amir Ghandi (talk) 06:12, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

The article Suleiman I of Persia you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Suleiman I of Persia for comments about the article, and Talk:Suleiman I of Persia/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pharaoh Thutmose III -- Pharaoh Thutmose III (talk) 11:41, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

	The Writer's Barnstar
	The quality of the articles you write is astounding! Thank you for your contribution to articles about Iranian history and culture! Salazar the terrible (talk) 07:53, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Salazar the terrible; Thank you for the barnstar, Salazar! Hoping to see your articles becoming GA one day. Amir Ghandi (talk) 17:19, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can you add Soleiman Khan Meykadeh to the genealogy of the Ashtiani family in the Mirza Kazem branch? You can find their relationship here. Basically, Soleiman Khan was the son of Mirza Ali, son of Mirza Yusef, son of Mirza Abdollah, who was in turn son of the aforementioned Mirza Kazem. Salazar the terrible (talk) 18:22, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Salazar the terrible; I'll try my best. But its been so long since I've worked with that kind of templates, so it might take some time. Amir Ghandi (talk) 03:08, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive
August 2023 Backlog Drive: On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here .
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. (t · c) buidhe 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've

criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of AirshipJungleman29 -- AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 15:42, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply

The article Mohammad Shah Qajar you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Mohammad Shah Qajar for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of AirshipJungleman29 -- AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 15:40, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

	Iranian barnstar
	I present this barnstar to you especially for your important articles about the constitutional history of Iran. thank you. Ταπυροι (گپ) 16:34, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@محک Thank you so much! Amir Ghandi (talk) 17:40, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I checked the sources of the article Siege of Astarabad. It seems that forgery has happened in this article! At first, I was extremely happy to see your articles, But I'm disappointed now! Why should anyone take the time to write such things?! Ταπυροι (گپ) 15:18, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@محک Well, that article was the reason I was banned from wikipedia for a time. I wrote that many years ago, only publishing it recently, and at the time I was foolish enough to do that. I had completely forgotten about it, but I think its time I delete that article. Amir Ghandi (talk) 16:58, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Precious anniversary

Precious

One year!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:36, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So as you may already know, many buildings and sites in other countries have their own templates via

I believe a similar thing should exist for national heritage sites of Iran, which number in tens of thousands. I did add a comment under their talk section for this a while ago, but I was ignored, can you try to get it done? Salazar the terrible (talk) 17:47, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Salazar the terrible. You need to request it in Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Historic sites not in Template talk:Designation. Once reaching a consensus there, one of the editors will take up the job. (Although bear in mind that it might go unanswered, in which case I'll make one myself.) Amir Ghandi (talk) 18:05, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Hi Amir. Have you ever emailed the Wikipedia Library people ([email protected]) to see if they're willing to grant you access to the library manually? They do make exceptions even for people who are blocked on other wikis, and I think you'd be a good candidate for that in light of your many content contributions. If you need any help or want me to send a request on your behalf, just let me know. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 04:42, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Extraordinary Writ. Hey, thanks for the offer. Kind of embarrassing for me to say it, but having another user support me might strengthen my chances, so would you please send a request on my behalf, I would really appreciate it. Thanks again. Amir Ghandi (talk) 06:20, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, not a problem. Sent. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:03, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds like the request has been accepted—does the Library work for you now? Extraordinary Writ (talk) 17:55, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Extraordinary Writ Yes it does! Thanks so much for the help Amir Ghandi (talk) 20:18, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive
March 2024 Backlog Drive: On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here or ask questions here.
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I know little English! Can you translate this section in Persian Wikipedia in Kashmar article? Thank you :) Araqkashmar (talk) 22:53, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Araqkashmar Done. Amir Ghandi (talk) 08:44, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Kashmar, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've

criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Aintabli -- Aintabli (talk) 01:24, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply