User talk:Andries

Jesus surrendered his ability to defeat Satan and that's why Word of faith adherents belive Christians can defeat him?

Do you guys actually ever read the Bible? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.52.20.235 (talk) 03:53, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Share and Ben creme articles

Hey, so your front page says your no longer active on wiki, this true? Anyways, Please check the Share international talk page. I've removed a section of text that was previously uncited. Someone cited the Share International website 5 times trying to back up the bold claims (claiming the submitted predictions to world news media) and I went ahead and removed the block of text, because no sufficent sources were given (citing the website the article is about does not seem sufficent.) However, I'm new to wikipedia and I'm not sure if this was too much, perhaps I should have re-edited the article to say "Share International claims that they submitted such and such predictions to world news media, but this has yet to be substaniated" Your the one that replied to my article telling me it's ok for me to remove it if it's uncited for a week or two after I drop the uncited tag. If you could let me know what I'm supposed to do, what the corrective action is if I'm wrong, point me to the right articles, anything, I'd much appreciate it. Of course, I'll be doing my own research, but being as new as I am, I'm not sure I'll easily be able to find something that bluntly has the answer I'm looking for. I just don't want to destroy an article without just cause (on the other hand, I don't feel it's right to make such bold unsubstantiated claims, wiki has a bad rep among many schools and teaching institutions.) Tainted Entanglement (talk) 04:49, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Biography Summer 2007 Assessment Drive

WikiProject Biography Summer 2007 Assessment Drive!

WikiProject Biography is holding a three month long assessment drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unassessed articles. The drive is running from June 1, 2007 â September 1, 2007.

Awards to be won range from delicacies such as the WikiCookie to the great Golden Wiki Award.
There are over 110,000 articles to assess so please visit the drive's page and help out!

This drive was conceived of and organized by

Type words!

.

Sock puppet

Checkuser stated it was not related by IP/location to a particular user, no more or less. It did not indicate that the account was not an abusive sockpuppet, only that the account is not related to an individual user. Vassyana (talk) 20:00, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that, but if you accuse someone of being a sockpuppet then at least you should know the puppet master. Otherwise it is a bit like calling somebody a thief and not being able to answer the question when the thief stole, nor what object he stole , nor from whom the thief stole. Andries (talk) 20:03, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think that's an apt comparison. If it walks like a duck, and talks like a duck ... The user has an obvious familiarity with the interface (very selective undo, using "rv" to mark a revert). Their edits were geared solely towards edit warring and disruption. Obvious familiarity + disruptive editing = abusive sockpuppet. It is the most common way that abusive sockpuppets are identified. Connections to particular established users are usually decided by a combination of editing patterns and checkuser verification. I hope that helps clear up where I'm coming from. Completely off-topic, how have you been of late? What's been occupying your time on-wiki? Vassyana (talk) 20:12, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I wrote nl:optische schijf. I am not sure about your reasoning. Someone may have been very familiar with the non-English Wikipedia and only then started editing the English Wikipedia. Andries (talk) 20:15, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good deal. :) I saw your edits in en.wiki here and there (making some damn sensible talk page comments). I suppose it could be someone familiar with another wiki, but the immediate participation in edit warring is highly suspicious. Regardless, disruption-only accounts are regularly blocked coming out of the gate. Vassyana (talk) 20:19, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Recovery from cults book cover AFF.jpg

Thanks for uploading

Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline

is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our
talk) 07:45, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Bala Sai Baba

Another editor has added the "{{
prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 10:00, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Sathya Sai Organisation official logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading
Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline
is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our
talk) 05:15, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Clerical sexual deviancy allegations

Why do you think my title was so bad you had to change it? The allegations were made against PRIESTS not ordinary believers. The current title just panders to fashionable anti-Catholic hate speech. Do you really think that Catholic believers should be singled out in this unfair way? Is wikipedia an encyclopedia or just an airing ground for media myths and propaganda? And don't tell me to write an article on other religious group members who have commiteed sexual offences cos I think the whole thing is just totally unscientific. Religion is not necessarily the determining factor. Say a person is a Catholic doctor who commits abuse. What made him do it - being a doctor or being a Catholic? I will not be party to irrational hatred directed at randomly selected groups, based on no evidence - I oppose it and I hope that any decent person would do the same thing. Colin4C (talk) 13:04, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have so many things to say that I do not know where to start. I am btw one of the main authors of Sathya Sai Baba. Andries (talk) 13:06, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think there is a reason why the topic of sexual abuse by religious authorities is notable and somewhat different from other sexual abuse. 1. religious authority have more
power (sociology) without any responsibility to other worldly authorities and differences of power tend quite naturally to lead to sexual abuse 2. the betrayal of trust in religious matters tends to be quite bad because religion ultimately depends on trust. Andries (talk) 13:59, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Re: category:critics of Islam

Hi Andries, the appropriate place to review the deletion is Wikipedia:Deletion review. I suggest you bring it up there if you think it deserves a category. Thanks. Spellcast (talk) 14:31, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I had listed it there, so I do not understand your comments. Andries (talk) 14:32, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
In that case, let's see if the deletion can be lifted. One of the main reasons it was deleted was because of the vague title and the possibility of too much
PoV problems. For it to be undeleted, it has to address those concerns. Spellcast (talk) 14:37, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply
]
I understand the objections but I do not agree with them. If we delete articles and categories merely because of possible POv problems then I think 90% of Wikipedia should be deleted. Andries (talk) 14:40, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kirtanananda Swami

"Changed section title I heard a different less flattering story"
I'm interested to hear your different story. Please tell.
talk) 22:09, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

ehh that a devotee of Kirtananda discovered that he had several wives and that he was angry about it, but I may be confused with another successor guru of Prabhupada. Andries (talk) 22:10, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your reply. I think perhaps you must be thinking of someone else. Kirtanananda didn't like women.

Regarding the assassination attempt: I believe the words "distraught" and "crazed" are appropriate. I will send an e-mail as I don't want it necessarily available here.
talk) 01:58, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Vandalism and other troubles in the article Siege of Leningrad

Hi, Andris,
You are right. Thank you very much for your kind reminder, I had so many books about the [[Siege of Leningrad] on my desk yesterday, that reading and editing the article took much attention, so I used the inuse template without a prior step, as you mentioned; albeit this does not mean that other users can now vandalize the article by deleting well referenced facts of history, with links to Britannica, books from my library, public libraries here in CA, and other sources.
Deletion of well sourced edits is vandalism. I do not have much time for dealing with vandals, and other users, who do not help make Wikipedia better.
Regards, Steve shelok honov 23:52, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Btw, if you know Russian and have time, I would appreciate some help with translating
Vistula-Oder offensive from the russian Wikipedia. See [1] Andries (talk) 23:57, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply
]
Articles are not identical, just like all books on history. The Russian discussion shows no activity since May 2007, their idea to post the original Russian map of operation was not accomplished, and Russian users became inactive. I'll look again during the next weekend. Steve shelok honov 00:58, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Military history WikiProject coordinator election

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are aiming to elect nine coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by February 14! TomStar81 (Talk) 01:23, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Jim_Jones_brochure_of_Peoples_Temple.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to
here
.
Please go to
Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline
is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 20:05, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

the nerve of some people

<silliness>How dare you
wikistalk me to a category deletion discussion and agree with me! The nerve! The outrage!</silliness> Just saying hello and I hope you're doing well. :) Vassyana (talk) 07:57, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

I think this dispute has geographical aspects i.e. activism against Islam seems to be a popular career opportunity (or more positively a popular vocation) lately here in the Netherlands. It is probably not that way in other countries and contributors who voted for deletion may not be aware of the current situation in the Netherlands. Andries (talk) 08:09, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXIII (January 2008)

The
talk) 23:02, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Kranenborg

I was depending on my memory of previous conversations regarding the source. I had thought he was discussing conversations involving witnessing to premies. My apologies if my memory is flawed and thanks for keeping close to the source. Do you still have a translation of the section used for reference kicking around? If you do, could I get a wikilink please? Thanks! Vassyana (talk) 22:45, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I just checked it. The word that Kranenborg uses is Dutch "ontmoeting" which is literally "meeting". Andries (talk) 22:46, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tx

Geen probleem, ik wist waar ik aan begon (translation: No problem, I knew what would be coming my way) --Francis Schonken (talk) 22:57, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Military history WikiProject coordinator election

The February 2008 Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting nine coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of fifteen candidates. Please vote here by February 28! --
talk) 12:09, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Prem Rawat 1RR probation

Per the discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Prem Rawat 1RR parole proposal, the articles now in category:Prem Rawat are on special 1RR and disruption probation. A notice describing the probation is at talk:Prem Rawat. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 01:32, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXIV (February 2008)

The
talk) 02:58, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Rawat link

Since your online, please do us all a favor and remove the Rick Ross link at the PR article.Momento (talk) 21:10, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Prem Rawat articles, should go to RFAR

In my opinion 1rr, and DR via AN and ANI, and discussion, have failed. Take it to RFAR.
t/e 18:18, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

I admit that my behavior in the last years was not completely innocent, though I do not think that I have made any serious violation of policies any guidelines in the last half year. Andries (talk) 18:22, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Arbitration

You have been named as a party at
Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration#Prem Rawat ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 20:31, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Prem Rawat

An Arbitration case involving you has been opened, and is located here. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Prem Rawat/Evidence. Please submit your evidence within one week, if possible. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Prem Rawat/Workshop.
On behalf of the Arbitration Committee,
talk) 02:46, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

The spread of Islam in Indonesia
...

Your question on the
The spread of Islam in Indonesia (as I had once intended to do) and updated and created a number of articles on the texts and the sunan - see my contribs for the last day or so. kind regards --Merbabu (talk) 14:26, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXV (March 2008)

The
talk) 00:23, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Sathya Sai Baba 2

Remedy 1.1 in
biographies of living persons
.
For the Arbitration Committee, Daniel (talk) 02:54, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Hello Andries,thank you for the advice.I will not vandalise again.Hope you enjoy wikipedia. From:Malaysian-Hardstyle

Lifting topic ban

No problem! The best thanks is to help keep things neutral there, and to remember to be careful about RSes so as to avoid any further trouble. If there's any doubt, bring it to
WP:RS/N for an opinion. --Relata refero (disp.) 13:20, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

AfD nomination of Cults and new religious movements in literature and popular culture

I have nominated
Cults and new religious movements in literature and popular culture, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cults and new religious movements in literature and popular culture (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Sceptre ^(talk) 18:03, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Prem Rawat mergers

You left ambiguous merge tags on Teachings of Prem Rawat. That particualr merge is being debated at Talk:Teachings of Prem Rawat#Merging?, but without you to explain your intent it's hard to make progress. Because there are several merge proposals on the table, I've create a central thread to discuss them and the overall division of material. Talk:Prem Rawat#Organization Your particiaption there would be helpful. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 22:10, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Theory of Religious Economy

Hello Andries,
Thanks for the helpful links and advice. I am new to wikipedia, so any input is much appreciated. I plan to work on the development section, researching some key figures and their applicable publications. I find the Theory of Religious Economy interesting and hope to make some relevant additions to the page. Any input or suggestions will be greatly appreciated. I am not familiar with the religious situation in the Netherlands (I am from the US), but would be interested in reading about criticisms of the theory from that region. Unrelated topic-My favorite artists (I am a painting major) are from the Netherlands - Bruegel, Van Eyck, Van Der Weyden, etc. Anyways, Thanks,-(Ad Re Spring 2008 (talk) 03:49, 27 May 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Hi Andries,
Thanks for you edits to the entry on Religious economy. It is certainly improving, but it still has much improvement to go. I am recruiting a set of students to improve it further, and I think that it will be much better by the time they are done with it. Their work cycle will be the next 6 weeks. So I would like a stay of merge-ing until after that and we and other Wikipedians can assess the value of the page then. Best, --Htw3 (talk) 13:40, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Munster

I moved Munster back where it came from. I think a requested move would make sense here. Münster and Munster are not at all the same. Angus McLellan (Talk) 17:24, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I had proposed it on the talk page and received no objections. Andries (talk) 17:30, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Well, you have one now, and if you'd like more than one, I'm sure I can rustle up a flashmob of irate Irish wikipedians. Angus McLellan (Talk) 17:43, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The article Munster keeps on getting incorrect links. I had removed most of them recently. Andries (talk) 17:47, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
And it will continue to collect incorrect links, just like all vaguely ambiguous names and many disambiguation pages. There are over 1500 pages link to Munster, most of which are referring to the Irish one on a very cursory check. It may make it slighly easier to spot mistaken links, but that's it. Angus McLellan (Talk) 18:15, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, the article
Munster (Ireland) will not collect incorrect incoming links. so there is a very good reason for the move. Andries (talk) 18:17, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVI (April 2008)

The
talk) 23:25, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Share International

I think not, making unsourced and unverifiable claims is advertising even if "claim" is stuck in front. Spurs is the best team in the world and Spurs claim they are the best team in the world are equally spammy. we call it the Age of Aquarius is a bit of a give away too. Jimfbleak (talk) 09:48, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

latest comments on my talk, since discussion seems to have moved there Jimfbleak (talk) 04:59, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Andries wrote: Is this notice board for discussing each and every minor religious group? To me, it seems that minor religious groups (See
list of cults) should not be discussed here only because of this reason. Andries (talk) 16:01, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Andries, Share International is not a religious group, and it has been discussed on Fringe theories/Noticeboard. (Even Alice Bailey's teachings, that Share International is loosely based on, can not be considered a religion.) The fact is that you are trying to use Wikipedia as a free web host to promote Share International; and -- know that this misuse has been made known -- you are trying to present yourself as a religious martyr. If you had written a balanced article, instead of that piece promotional hype, all this dispute could have been completely avoided. Malcolm Schosha (talk) 17:26, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I have been accused of both anti-cult and pro-cult. The former more often than the latter. So I think your allegation that I try to promote Share International is untrue. Andries (talk) 21:50, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Let me repeat: If you had written a balanced article, instead of that piece promotional hype you did write, all this dispute could have been completely avoided. And I can add: When you change the articles so that they are neutral, there will be no further dispute. Malcolm Schosha (talk) 22:05, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There seems to be some misunderstanding here. Andries has worked diligently at being a royal pain in the neck to anyone trying to get a fair hearing for just about ANY new religious group. If he is a martyr, he is an anti-religious one. I don't think his intention here was to be promotional, more likely he was trying to assert his neutrality. It won't work, Andries! (How are you going, by the way?) Rumiton (talk) 13:02, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Prem Rawat

This arbitration case has been closed and the final decision is available at the link above. Evidence presented did not disclose a history of problematic editing, in terms of basic content policy, by
chat) 15:17, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Cults, sects, and new religious movements

This project that you created was proposed for speedy deletion on the grounds that it overlaps with Wikipedia:WikiProject Religion. I have removed the speedy tags, but maybe you need to discuss with the folks over at Wikipedia:WikiProject Religion, to see what links there should be. Maybe it could be a sub-project or a task force. --Bduke (talk) 09:08, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sikh Thugs

Page 329 of the UK edition - notes to Chapter 16.
"There seem to have been very few Sikh Thugs. But Sahib Khan, the Deccan strangler, 'knew Ram Sing Siek: he was a noted Thug leader - a very shrewd man,' who also served with the Pindaris for a while and was responsible for the assassination of the notorious Pindari leader Sheikh Dulloo.' Sleeman, Ramaseeana I, 239-40."

Thanks! Mikedash (talk) 23:49, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVII (May 2008)

The
talk) 23:28, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Theory of Religious Economy

I'd like your thoughts on the additions to this article from the "Spring 2008" editors. It seems like they ARE doing this for a class, despite previous assertions that the educational aspect was done. It does seem like they're not used to speaking and writing formal English. Am I
WP:BITEing them by aggressively copyediting as much of they write as I can stand? Jclemens (talk) 03:05, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

I think it is okay. The problems with the article are several
1. rather off-topic digressions

2. too much US-centric and as a related consequence tend to lump different countries together that have little in common with regards to cultural differences and religions. For example, Belgium and the Netherlands that are neighbouring countries have a completely different law against cults (no laws in the Netherlands). Also post-communist countries differ very much from each other. Why is Czechia free but non-religious and why is Russia much more religious? (Though I believe there is a lot of room for non-Orthodox religion in Russia)

3. Not NPOV: criticism is missing. Clearly this theory cannot explain as much as it proponents claim.

4. Lay out and referencing should be improved.

Andries (talk) 11:17, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Plagiarism guideline

I've proposed the creation of a separate guideline for plagiarism and avoiding it. See here. I mentioned there the guideline you created in your user space. Hopefully someone will use that to start it off. Carcharoth (talk) 19:58, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVIII (June 2008)

The
talk) 17:26, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXIX (July 2008)

The
talk) 00:23, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Proposed deletion of Arathi

A
dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page
.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the
proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 04:45, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

AfD nomination of Arathi

I have nominated Arathi, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arathi. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Judgesurreal777 (talk) 23:45, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
MfD nomination of User:Andries/list of self-proclaimed deities

sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Andries/list of self-proclaimed deities during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 16:55, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Nominations for the Military history WikiProject coordinator election

The
talk) 21:25, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXX (August 2008)

The
talk) 22:18, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Your User Page

You may think your User Page quotes to be succinct and rather clever but I have the upper-hand on you both intellectually, morally, and religiously. The next time you consider using intellect as a mask for your true agenda, ponder that your quote betrays no more depth of thought or consideration than the dribble produced for mass-consumption by Nichez.

Moral decisions are not always bad by definition. If truth exists, then it may at times be arrived at by human beings.
And your address of the legitimacy of organized religion based on the motivation of their adherents in taking them up is circular and non-sensical at best! Why not address a particular religion as to its truth, or worse, all of them as being untrue. What does their adherents' motivations have to do with these religions' claims as to what is true and what is not.

You have read yourself into a box filled with things you wish to read. My warning to you is that in this manner you will not find the truth and this may be doing you a great disservice of cumulative character. No amount of thinking will change the truth.
Epigraphist (talk) 15:44, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

But I have compassion upon you regarding your experience with Sathya Sai Baba. Believe me perhaps not, but I assure you that there is one truth and that humans are capable of understanding parts of it -very important parts- in the life that is knowable by the senses.
You have my consideration.
Epigraphist (talk) 15:48, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Military history WikiProject coordinator election

The September 2008
talk) 21:09, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXI (September 2008)

The
talk) 21:49, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Sathya Sai Baba movement

I went through and removed a ton of unsourced material from that article, though there are still whole chunks of portions with no citations. Cirt (talk) 06:57, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

~~I do not see many unsourced statements in the article. Andries (talk) 06:59, 4 November 2008 (UTC)~~[reply]
There are whole unsourced paragraphs in a few places. Cirt (talk) 07:13, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
After a second look, I do see quite a lot of unsourced material, but many of it is either well-known, publicly verifiable, and undisputed (e.g. about the ashram) or sourced already in the article Sathya Sai Baba. Andries (talk) 07:14, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Well that does not help the fact that there is uncited/unsourced material in this article. (Especially an article like this on a controversial topic.) Cirt (talk) 08:02, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why is Sathya Sai Baba movement unbalanced?

Because there is quite obviously nothing featured relating to the public reception of the movement. Also, there are a number of web based sources used, these are weak verifiers, especially if the site is a Sai Baba site. Plus, there is nothing about the controversey surrounding the miracle work, or the attempts to debunk it, the videos that evidence trickery, or anything about certain key followers responses to abuse allegations. Also, nothing about the movements ties to state government and policing or the wider influential network that includes a number of notable individuals. I have just toned down one paragraph that read pretty poorly in terms of objectivity. I'm afraid I will have to decline from entering into further discussion on this. If the tag offends you please remove it. Thanks. Semitransgenic (talk) 21:19, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

1. Public reception is missing, I have to admit that, but that has little to do with neutrality.

2.I think the controversies (sexual abuse, false miracles) should be treated in Sathya Sai Baba, not here, because they are very closely related to the person of Sathya Sai Baba. Lack of substance in teachings should and is treated here.

3.I cannot remove the neutrality tag, because the arbcom thinks that I have a conflict of interest.

Andries (talk) 21:26, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Just by way of clarifying the tag directive: it relates to balance. It simply asks readers to: Please improve the article by adding information on neglected viewpoints. There are clearly a number of neglected view points, I don't doubt there is plenty in the literature on
NRM's of relevance, I simply don't have the time to delve into any of it. Regarding the other points, his followers constitute 'the movement', therefore what they believe can be legitimately addressed. One of the core beliefs has to do with acceptance of miracle work so why is it incorrect to deal with the criticism and controversy surrounding this? And, there are quite obviously ties between the movement and local government, and with members of the Indian government but this is not addressed either. Forgive me for being cynical but the article is, in many respects, a content fork from the main Sai Baba page, I don't see how you can separate the man from the movement when one emanates from the other.If you are a true devotee you will find a way to remove the tag ; ) That's my final word on the issue Semitransgenic (talk) 00:13, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply
]
I am not sure whether the movement emanates from the leader. There is a line of thoughts in study of cults that says that far too much influence has attributed to the leader (e.g. J. Gordon Melton is a representative of that)

A short treament of the controversies in Sathya Sai Baba movement and further referring to Sathya Sai Baba for more information would be okay to me but a re-hashing of the controversies, sorry, no, I think that would be wrong. Andries (talk) 07:05, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXII (October 2008)

The
talk) 23:21, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Hi,

The modest and plain look of what is nowadays considered the traditional Dutch cuisine,

Yes But is there an article on the traditional Dutch cuisine? The link is red...
Warrington (talk) 10:51, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, bu~t I think there should be. The reason is that traditional Dutch cuisine is very different from the motley contemporary Dutch cuisine. They are two different subjects. Andries (talk) 20:49, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I agree!. Wonderful idea
Are they any good sources and references on this subject?

Warrington (talk) 12:42, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mediation on Prem Rawat

Andries, you were involved in Vassyana's informal mediation on the Prem Rawat articles, and I was not. However I read through the talk pages earlier this year and got the impression that over that lengthy mediation Vassyana had tended to support one side more than another. For that reason I have opposed Vassyana's nomination for ArbCom. Another user has stated that they don't think Vassyana showed partiality. I don't want to make a big case of this, but I suppose it'd be helpful to other voters to provide some evidence. As I said, that mediation lasted a long time and spread across many talk page archives. You know the case far better than I, so in the interests of time and efficiency I'm wondering if you have any relevant recollections of Vassyana's participation (pro or con) that you can share. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 20:10, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My view on the matter is colored because I then felt and still feel that the complaints by User:jossi and user:momento about an alleged violation of
WP:NOT are baseless. There was no need for a rewrite. See the mediation by Vassyana of Talk:Techniques_of_Knowledge. To be honest I do not really remember much of the mediation by Vassyana on talk:Prem Rawat except that some of his assessments of sources (e.g. Levine, Van der Lans) was misguided. Andries (talk) 15:57, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXIII (November 2008)

The
talk) 15:51, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

CfD nomination of Category:Anti-Islam activists

renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Cgingold (talk) 12:15, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply
]
Proposed deletion of List of religious sects

A
List of religious sects
, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

No content.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's
dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page
.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the
proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Editor2020 (talk) 04:03, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXIV (December 2008)

The
talk) 01:55, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

no.

"I am busy providing citations on the talk page. Did you check it? Please restore statement for which citations have already been provided on the talk page. Arbcom thinks that I have a conflict of interest, so I cannot edit the article directly.".
the onus is on those who want statements to be included to add the references. If you can get people to agree with your sources, get them to re-add the statements WITH the sources, unsourced statements will not sit on BLP article pages while the sources are being discussed. they can be re-added when people agree the sources are good. I'll be reading that article more carefully later - if it's not got a source, I'll scrub it - as per our BLP policy. --Cameron Scott (talk) 22:11, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
There are no "exceptional circumstances" - it's unsourced, it's gone. I can see why you aren't directly allow to edit the article if you don't understand the basis of WP:BLP. --Cameron Scott (talk) 22:16, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXV (January 2009)

The
talk) 03:02, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

Aktion T4 and euthanasia (February 2009)

May be you are interested in the recent
"discussion" about modifications recently made on the section Aktion T4 and euthanasia
of the that article

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVI (February 2009)

The
talk) 21:22, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

Coordinator Elections

Nominations for Coordinator positions in the
Military History WikiProject have commenced, and voting will begin on March 14, 2009. Make sure to get involved and ask questions to the candidates. Nominations for Coordinators goes until March 13. Then come out for the voting which begins on March 14. Thanks and Have a Great Day! Lord R. T. Oliver ^{The Olive Branch} 00:02, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

Nominations for the Military history WikiProject coordinator election

The
talk) 18:02, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

Sathya Sai Baba and Arbitration Enforcement

Please note that I have created an
here. ←Spidern → 14:26, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

I think you know more about the Dec 2007 version than I do. Please contribute your thoughts to the above link and why this version is better than the current version. I have written some of my comments. Radiantenergy (talk) 16:28, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Francis Lucille

Hi, I have found your usernames on articles related to advaita. I need your help and suggestion. I am trying to add an article on one of the Living spiritual teacher. but,I am facing an problem.
The editors who have visited this page don't understand spirituality and they have tagged it for deletion. i need your help urgently. so they are trying to compare it with other biographies in the field of sports etc. As you know,the field the spirituality is not very commercial. so I am having a hard time convincing them. could you please help and and take a look at article. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francis_Lucille http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Francis_Lucille.
Appreciate all your help.

Thanks Amarhindustani (talk) 18:35, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Military history WikiProject coordinator election

The
talk) 00:07, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs

Dutch underground press

Royal Netherlands Football Association

Baghdadi Jews

Steenbergen

Deontological ethics

Van der Made

Paramatman

Swarupanand

Hofje van Guurtje de Waal

Manji (era)

Criticisms of socialism

Hans Brinker or the Silver Skates

Kampen Theological University

Pieter Post

List of sieges

Ockenburg

Hofje In den Groenen Tuin

Universiteit voor Humanistiek

Zevenbergen

Cleanup

Schools of Buddhism

Virtue ethics

Religiosity

Merge

Bayonet

Process philosophy

Psychiatric survivors movement

Add Sources

Names of God

Henotheism

Bai Chongxi

Wikify

Toon Hermans

The Legend of the Matsheumhlope Crocodile

Merchant raider

Expand

Aart Staartjes

HFC Haarlem

Cultural views of suicide

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 16:28, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVII (March 2009)

The
talk) 01:51, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

Proposed deletion of Parody religion

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Parody religion, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

not notable OR and SYN

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's
dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page
.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the
proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Mamalujo (talk) 04:05, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVIII (April 2009)

The
talk) 22:20, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

Wikipedia:External Links

Hello Andries. Pruning through the history of
WP:EL, I found this thread which you created. I agree with you about the ridiculous strictness, and I observe that it has, perhaps accidentally, partially returned, though it's often not applied in practice. I started a discussion here: Wikipedia_talk:External_links#Proposed_ELNO_.232_exception. PSWG1920 (talk) 01:48, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XXXIX (May 2009)

The
talk) 22:03, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

SSB

A vote on adding the youtube videos to the Sathya Sai Baba page can be found here. Your opinion on the matter would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Onopearls ^(t/c) 02:36, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

barnstar

The Original Barnstar

For your continued efforts to bring a sense of balance to the Sathya Sai Baba page through the sandbox Onopearls ^(t/c) 03:17, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please share your perspective in this discussion:[2]. Thank you : ). Dilip rajeev (talk) 19:43, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XL (June 2009)

The
talk) 21:14, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

File:Pre-flavoured tofu from Albert Heijn supermarkt chain the Netherland nr3.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Pre-flavoured tofu from Albert Heijn supermarkt chain the Netherland nr3.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.
If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.
If you have any questions please see
Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:32, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLI (July 2009)

The
talk) 18:43, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

Arbitration Enforcement Case

You can see this case related to Sathya Sai Baba article here http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&diff=prev&oldid=307807198

Radiantenergy (talk) 20:29, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

New Kadampa tradition

Isnt anyone going to do anything about this page? They are a hugely controversial NRM who manipulate WP wantonly. If the Brahma Kumaris on 'on probation' the NKTY should certainly be so-read the edit histories/discussion94.192.139.167 (talk) 17:04, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations open for the Military history WikiProject coordinator election

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 12 September!
Many thanks, Roger Davies ^talk 04:24, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLII (August 2009)

The
talk) 18:59, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

Military history coordinator elections: voting has started!

Voting in the Military history WikiProject coordinator election has now started. The aim is to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of sixteen candidates. Please vote here by 23:59 (UTC) on 26 September!
For the coordinators, Roger Davies ^talk 22:09, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Social and Cultural Planning Office

The article Social and Cultural Planning Office has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No assertion of notability. Every nation has government agencies, no reason for WP to have an article on this one.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be
deleted for any of several reasons
.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page
.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{
dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Northwestgnome (talk) 04:28, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIII (September 2009)

The
talk) 22:13, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

Test your World War I knowledge with the Henry Allingham International Contest!

As a member of the
Operation Great War Centennial
, the project's commemorative effort for the World War I centenary.
If you would like to participate, please sign up by 11 November 2009, 00:00, when the first round is scheduled to begin! You can sign up
talk) 17:39, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIV (October 2009)

The
talk) 17:39, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

Request for Assistance

I am inviting members of Wikipedia:WikiProject Religion/New religious movements work group in on the discussion of Move/name change/notability/merge discussion on New England Institute of Religious Research Currently PelleSmith (talk · contribs) and Weaponbb7 (talk · contribs) seem to have reached a roadblock in discourse with Cirt (talk · contribs). Any help would be appreciated! Weaponbb7 (talk) 23:14, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XIV (November 2009)

The
talk) 03:43, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVI (December 2009)

The
talk) 02:28, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

Sai Baba article

Hi Andries. How is the German researcher work going? The sources I have are somewhat old, and do not touch on the controversies. Can you help me with scholarly articles that do, especially ones that evaluate how much, and in what ways, the various allegations have impacted on the organisation and the subject himself? Thanks. Rumiton (talk) 15:22, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVII (January 2010)

The
talk) 02:50, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

Nominations for the March 2010 Military history Project Coordinator elections now open!

The
talk) 20:58, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVIII (February 2010)

The
talk) 21:52, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

Coordinator elections have opened!

Voting for the
talk) 21:21, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIX (March 2010)

The
talk) 21:14, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : L (April 2010)

The
talk) 18:59, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

TM RFAR

FYI. Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Transcendental Meditation movement has already moved to the voting phase, so I doubt the committee members are paying much attention to the evidence page anymore. To the extent that they are, I don't think that background materials would help them. I suspect that the only thing that would interest them now would be evidence of recent egregious behavior. Will Beback talk 11:00, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LI (May 2010)

The
talk) 17:18, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not
autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages
.
When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious
Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here
.
If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 04:47, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LII (June 2010)

The
talk) 18:37, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LIII (July 2010)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue LIII (July 2010) Front page
Project news
Articles
Members
Editorial

Project news

New parameter for military conflict infobox introduced;
Preliminary information on the September coordinator elections

Articles

Milhist's newest featured and A-Class content

Members

July's contest results, the latest awards to our members, plus an interview with Parsecboy

Editorial

Opportunities for new military history articles

To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section
here
.

This has been an automated delivery by
talk) 21:09, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

User:ZirconiumTwice

Hi there. Have you ever awarded the above user a barnstar? He's using your name on a barnstar on his talkpage. He's been in a number of editing disputes recently so I have his pages watched, but you don't appear to have done this. Cheers, Strange Passerby (talk) 11:14, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I was just coming to ask this myself. In this s/he places it on the talkpage, and in a recent edit edited it so that it appears to be from you. Thanks! Syrthiss (talk) 11:35, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I did not give Zirconiumtwice a barnstar, nor anyone under the user id Andries. (I am always afraid that my daughter will take revenge on me by abusing my userid when I tell her to do homework or to help in the household.)Andries (talk) 20:57, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Email

I received your email. Please use my talk page to contact me. Stifle (talk) 08:21, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LIV (August 2010)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue LIV (August 2010) Front page
Project news
Articles
Members
Editorial

Project news

The return of reviewer awards, task force discussions, and more information on the upcoming coordinator election

Articles

A recap of the month's new Featured and A-Class articles, including a new featured sound

Members

Our newest A-class medal recipients and this August's top contestants

Editorial

In the first of a two-part series, Moonriddengirl discusses the problems caused by copyright violations

To change your delivery options for this newsletter please list yourself in the appropriate section
talk) 22:56, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

Nokia C6

Hi, now that you've converted
WP:FIXDABLINKS? (I would do it myself but I'm not certain the C6-01 should be in the list or not.) Thanks, --JaGa^talk 10:14, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

There are a lot. But if you're going to go creating disambig pages, you should be willing to make the necessary changes to fix the templates you affect. I see you've done Nokia X3 now - there are two templates to fix: see here. Could you take care of that? --JaGa^talk 10:28, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Will do, please be a bit patient. Nevertheless I continue to hold the opinion that the number of lists and templates for Nokia and Symbian phones should be reduced to improve maintainability. Andries (talk) 10:32, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Milhist election has started!

The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has started. You are cordially invited to help pick fourteen new coordinators from a pool of twenty candidates. This time round, the term has increased from six to twelve months so it is doubly important that you have your say! Please cast your vote here no later than 23:59 (UTC) on Tuesday, 28 September 2010.
With many thanks in advance for your participation from the coordinator team, Roger Davies ^talk 21:17, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your comment at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2010 September 19#camera phones by megapixel count

I see you commented at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2010 September 19#camera phones by megapixel count]] that you think that certain other categories (Category:autofocus camera phones and Category:Xenon flash camera phones should be created. Please note that this isn't the subject of the CfD discussion; only categories which define the camera phones by megapixel count (or pixel count, or any similar count) are relevant. If you want these categories create, feel free to create them. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 12:44, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Non-existent link Nokia C5-03

Hello, Andries
I see that you have added
Template:Nokia phones and have made a disambiguation page out of Nokia C5 the disambiguate Nokia C5-00
and C5-03. However, the problem is that no such article as Nokia C5-03 is currently in existence. Please notice that the aim of a disambiguation page and as well as a navbox is to help people reach articles more effectively, not to lead them to dead ends. If you wish to create a link to C5-03, please create a valid article first.
I have reverted your edits per
D part of BRD (discussion). Fleet Command (talk) 05:36, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

I created the article, but in hindsight what should have been done is to unlink Nokia C5-03 (i.e. "Nokia C5-03"") on the disambig Nokia C5 page, instead of removing the disambiguation. Andries (talk) 18:40, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I see. Thank you very much. Perhaps you are right; or... perhaps you haven't seen as many spinster red links entries as I did. But I guess we're bound to come across such bumps in editing such a large encyclopedia. Cheers. Fleet Command (talk) 19:12, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LV (September 2010)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue LV (September 2010) Front page
Project news
Articles
Members
Editorial

Project news

The results of September's coordinator elections, plus ongoing project discussions and proposals

Articles

A recap of the month's new Featured and A-Class articles

Members

Our newest A-class medal recipients, this September's top contestants, plus the reviewers' Roll of Honour (Apr-Sep 2010)

Editorial

In the final part of our series on copyright, Moonriddengirl describes how to deal with copyright infringements on Wikipedia

To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section
talk) 21:01, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Children of God

renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. The Resident Anthropologist (talk) 18:22, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply
]
The Bugle: Issue LVI, October 2010

Your Military history Newsletter

Project News: Editors for the newsletter, GAN backlog reduction drive

Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content

Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients

Editorial: EyeSerene sums up our "Five years of military history"

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section
talk) 21:52, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue LVII, November 2010

Your Military History Newsletter

Project News: From the editors, "Military Historian of the Year", New Incubator, Black Project Report

Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content

Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients

Editorial: bahamut guides us through "Nominating military biographies for deletion"

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section
talk) 21:56, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

thanks for re-organizing the set of Symbian related articles

Most welcome :) I read up a bit on the talk pages and I saw someone say it needs to be done, plus I figured it could be merged since I'm a quality-not-quantity sort, you know, the bigger the mess, the harder it gets for newcomers to understand what in the world Symbian/Platform/OS/whatever is and what it does. I hope I can make it simpler, I actually just did a cut-paste job with a little bit of thought since I was really busy on that day. Its rare to ever get any thanks or compliments on Wikipedia, so yours is much appreciated. For years I've been waiting for those barnstars ... I've done a lot of work on other articles, written up lots to expand them - full list on my user page.....
(reply) 21:40, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue LVIII, December 2010

Your military history newsletter – Volume LVIII, December 2010

From the editors • "Military Historian of the Year" • Discussions • The month's new featured and A-class content • Review awards
Contest results • A-class medal recipients • bahamut teaches us proper usage of "Jargon and acronyms"

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the
talk) 20:17, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

Autopatrolled

Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the
new page patrollers
. Please remember:

This permission does not give you any special status or authority

Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal

You may wish to display the {{
User wikipedia/autopatrolled
}} userbox on your user page

If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it

If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! Acalamari 11:28, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Symbian

Thanks! I reorganized them because I saw the mess it was in and how hard it would make it for newcomers. Would love a barnstar just for the heck of it!!!
(reply) 10:30, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

Hi! Good idea, take a look at my contribs on my user page. All listed and waiting to be explored. Have fun. --
(reply) 20:00, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

Did I do well? --
(reply) 01:20, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

Barnstar

Hi andries.
Writing to remind you that you offered a barnstar if my contributions were good. Please see my user page for the full list. I've created 6 pages fully, from scratch, and lots of other new sections as well.
Thanks, Tom --
(reply) 11:02, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

THANK YOU!!!! --
(reply) 01:29, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Volume LVIX, January 2011

Your Military history Newsletter

Project News: From the editors

Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content

Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients

Editorial: EyeSerene discusses "Writing neutrally for Wikipedia"

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section
talk) 15:10, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue LX, February 2011

Your Military History Newsletter

Project News: From the editors

Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content

Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients

Editorial: Ed talks about real-world collaborations and how you can help

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section
talk) 21:08, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue LXI, March 2011

Your Military History Newsletter

Project News: From the editors

Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content

Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients

Editorial: Dank helps you see what article writers want from reviewers

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section
talk) 01:10, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue LXII, April 2011

Your Military History Newsletter

Project News: From the editors

Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content

Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients

Editorial: Buggie111 discusses neutral point of view

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section
talk) 21:47, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

Nomination of Post-cult trauma for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Post-cult trauma is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Post-cult trauma until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. The Resident Anthropologist (talk)•(contribs) 19:49, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

thx for the warning. Andries (talk) 18:12, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Defense of neutral editing

Hi, Andries
I wonder if you remember me from the old days (like 2004) when we worked together on cult articles. As I recall, you and I took opposite sides yet always worked together without any friction. Each of us respected the work of the other, and both of us felt free to describe the opposing points of view on ideas such as cult brainwashing. I don't think we ever had an edit war or an NPOV dispute. --Uncle Ed (talk) 00:02, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXIII, May 2011

Your Military History Newsletter

Project News: From the editors – Contest results, A-class medal recipients

Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content

Editorial: Hawkeye's thoughts on the article writing process

To begin or stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section
talk) 22:01, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

Nokia Nseries

I think it would be better if people will have one page to search for the phones lying on the Nseries, Eseries, Cseries, Xseries and Tseries range. I'm going to redirect it again, after 72 hours.Beyoncé Superfanatic 18:20, 15 June 2011 (UTC)User:Beyoncé Superfanatic

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Ed Poor 2 has been amended by the Arbitration Committee

Please see here for further details. On behalf of the arbitration committee, Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 11:06, 25 June 2011 (UTC).[reply]

RFC comment

Andries. Regarding your comment at the Cirt RFC do you think you can elaborate a bit more on the connection between what you say about Cirt and the statement you make about Melton and other sources on NRMs. Those of us who are not as familiar with Cirt's editing in that area may not understand why you are talking about those sources. I don't understand why. I agree with you that they are reliable sources, but am not sure why you are pointing that out. Thanks.Griswaldo (talk) 13:05, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Because Jayen said in the RFC that Cirt rejected Melton as a reliable source. Search for "Melton". Andries (talk) 13:08, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Ah. Got it. Sorry there has been so much information in the RFC that I can't keep track of it all. Maybe it would be good to mention that in the comment? Thanks.Griswaldo (talk) 13:15, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
OK thanks for the clarification on my talk page. I have altered my endoresment so as to connect my view about good faith with what you meant.Griswaldo (talk) 13:56, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Melton's methodology

Andries, I'm no expert when it comes to Melton or the study of NRMs, but I do have a fair amount of basic knowledge of this area in the study of religion. What people like Melton are doing is really, and perhaps surprisingly to ex-members, very mainstream when it comes to religious studies methodology. When religion scholars study mainstream religions they rarely incorporate the testimony of apostates. Now, I understand that there are contextual differences that might suggest that apostate (or "ex-member") experiences are more important in the NRM field than in the study of religion more generally -- for instance NRMs have a much higher turnover rate in membership. So maybe someone like Melton is applying standard methods to a fault and maybe there are fair criticisms to be had there. That said, I think there is a lack of appreciation among those who criticize his work, and that of many of his colleagues, of that fact that their approach is really very standard within the study of religion, and to them treating NRMs differently than other religions would be doing them an injustice. Cheers.Griswaldo (talk) 14:20, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I understand all this, but I also understand very well that some ex-members (and anti-cultists) are angry with Melton because he treats critical ex-members as if the story of their lives is completely irrelevant. With such an attitude, Melton pushed ex-members to the anti-cult movement. Ignoring stories of ex-members who in some cases, like myself, had a really bad experience is a sensitive issue for me. So I had better stop writing about it. But I hope it is clear from what I wrote that I read and thought about it. I also read some books by Bromley about the subject, among others, The Politics of Religious Apostasy. Andries (talk) 14:53, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Arbitration Notification

Hello, due to recent events a request for arbitration has been filed by ResidentAnthropologist (talk · contribs) regarding long standing issues in the "Cult" topic area. The request can be found at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Cults The Resident Anthropologist (talk)•(contribs) 07:39, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge discussion for Access time

here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. § Music Sorter § (talk) 06:19, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue LXIV, June 2011

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results

Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content

Book reviews: Nick-D looks at Finland and Spitfires

Op-ed: Fifelfoo and hunting for plagiarism

To receive this newsletter on your talk page,
talk) 22:25, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

Nomination of
Cults and new religious movements in literature and popular culture
for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
Cults and new religious movements in literature and popular culture is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted
.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cults and new religious movements in literature and popular culture(3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. The Resident Anthropologist (talk)•(contribs) 21:45, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Manipulation of BLPs opened

An arbitration case involving you has been opened, and is located at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Manipulation of BLPs. Evidence that you wish the Arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence sub-page, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Manipulation of BLPs/Evidence. Please add your evidence by August 16, 2011, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can contribute to the case workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Manipulation of BLPs/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, NW (Talk) 23:19, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXV, July 2011

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results

Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content

Book reviews: Nick-D looks at Zeebrugee and Afghanistan

Op-ed: WereSpielChequers examines RfA

To receive this newsletter on your talk page,
talk) 21:27, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Manipulation of BLPs closed

An arbitration case regarding of Manipulation BLPs has now closed and the final decision is viewable at the link above. The following is a summary of the remedies enacted:

Editors who edit biographies of living persons and other articles referring to living persons are reminded that all editing of these articles must comply with the biographies of living persons policy and with the principles set forth in this decision;

Administrators and other experienced editors are urged to take a proactive approach in addressing violations and alleged violations of the BLP policy, and to watchlist
the BLP noticeboard
and participate in discussing and resolving issues raised on that noticeboard;

To the extent that parties to this case have been engaged in protracted disputes and quarrels with other parties, the feuding parties are urged to avoid any unnecessary interactions with each other, except to the extent necessary for legitimate purposes such as dispute resolution;

If disputes concerning editing of biographical articles by parties to this case persist, appropriate dispute resolution methods should be pursued. To the extent possible, such dispute resolution should be led and addressed by editors who have not previously been involved in the disputes. If a specific serious dispute persists and other means of dispute resolution do not resolve them, a new and specifically focused request for arbitration may be filed not less than 30 days from the date of this decision.

For the Arbitration Committee, Alexandr Dmitri (talk) 15:18, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXVI, August 2011

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results

Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content

Book reviews: Nick-D looks at Carthage and Australia in Palestine

Op-ed: Remembering 9/11

To receive this newsletter on your talk page,
this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 17:30, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

Survey for new page patrollers

New page patrol – Survey Invitation

Hello Andries! The
WMF
is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.

If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.

You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

Delivered by
Wiki Media Foundation at 11:06, 25 October 2011 (UTC).[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue LXVII, September 2011

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results

Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content

Book reviews: Nick-D and Ian Rose look at Australian air power

Op-ed: Buggie111 ruminates about WikiLife and WikiDeath

To receive this newsletter on your talk page,
this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 01:49, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue LXVIII, October 2011

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results

Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content

Book reviews: Nick-D analyzes three books from Osprey Publishing

Review essay: Nick-D reviews the new Bundeswehr Military History Museum

To receive this newsletter on your talk page,
this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 07:49, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

Roos Vonk

I found accidentely your article about Roos Vonk. Are you going to finish that? She is now extra interesting... <evil grin>
_talk 01:06, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

Your article has been moved to AfC space

Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here:
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Roos Vonk, this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article, if you have any questions please ask on my talk page! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 00:28, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

Roos Vonk, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's
grading scheme
to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to
Articles for Creation
.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the Help desk or on the article reviewer's talk page

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

The Bugle: Issue LXIX, November 2011

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors – MHotY coming; contest results

Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content

Book reviews: Nick-D looks at the Congolese Wars

Review essay: Ian Rose goes to El Alamein

Op-ed: DCI's call to revitalize WikiProject History

The Bugle is published by the
[majestic titan] 20:09, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

Military Historian of the Year

Nominations for the "
Military history WikiProject.[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue LXX, January 2012

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results

Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content

Book reviews: Nick-D Nick-D looks into two recent Milhist books

Review essay: Kirill Lokshin, the first coordinator

Op-ed: Hchc's English Castles

The Bugle is published by the
[majestic titan] 23:39, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue LXXI, February 2012

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results

Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content

Book reviews: Nick-D looks into two recent Milhist books

Op-ed: Ian Rose discusses article assessments

The Bugle is published by the
[majestic titan] 09:29, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue LXXII, March 2012

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results

Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content

Book reviews: Nick-D looks into two recent Milhist books

Op-ed: Hawkeye on Wikipedia collaborating with the AWM

The Bugle is published by the
[majestic titan] 01:58, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

Dispute resolution survey

Dispute Resolution – Survey Invite

Hello Andries. I am currently conducting a study on the dispute resolution processes on the English Wikipedia, in the hope that the results will help improve these processes in the future. Whether you have used dispute resolution a little or a lot, now we need to know about your experience. The survey takes around five minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist in analyzing the results of the survey. No personally identifiable information will be released.
Please click HERE to participate.
Many thanks in advance for your comments and thoughts.

You are receiving this invitation because you have had some activity in dispute resolution over the past year. For more information, please see the associated
DR goes to Wikimania! 00:39, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue LXXIII, April 2012

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results

Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content

Book reviews: Bomzibar on Subhas Chandra Bose; Hawkeye on corps commanders; Nick-D on American special forces

Op-ed: The Land on commemorating World War I

The Bugle is published by the
[majestic titan] 23:48, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue LXXIV, May 2012

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results

Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content

Book reviews: Bomzibar on Chiang Kai-shek; Nick-D on the Falklands War

Interview: Article writers discuss biographies

Op-ed: Nick-D examines using news articles as sources

The Bugle is published by the
[majestic titan] 14:19, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

GOCE July 2012 Copy Edit Drive

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results

Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content

Book reviews: Nick-D on the Chaco War and the Bougainville Campaign

Op-ed: Remembering conflict

The Bugle is published by the
[majestic titan] 18:37, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

Your amendment request

I removed it in this edit based on my interpretation of your last comment. Let me know if you think I made an error. Best, NW (Talk) 05:39, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXXVI, July 2012

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors: Wikimania 2012; special projects note

Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content

Book reviews: Nick-D on the Australian 25th Battalion

Interview: Article writers discuss buildings and fortifications

Op-ed: Hawkeye7 reports on a weekend workshop

The Bugle is published by the
[majestic titan] 09:03, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

Your ArbCom request

It needs formatting and placing in the correct place. Go to Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification_and_Amendment/Template#Template_for_requests_for_a_single_amendment_to_a_case. Copy the template, and paste it below the four dashes "----" here. Then fill in the information from here as appropriate, deleting that post when you have finished. SilkTork ^{✔Tea time} 15:21, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

SilkTork, I think your second link ("here") no longer points to what it did when you wrote it. It might be easier for Andries and for Arbcom if one of the arb clerks could refactor Andries' request as needed. 69.228.170.132 (talk) 16:02, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, it seems odd to declare on your user page that you are retired while seeking more editing rights from ArbCom. Tijfo098 (talk) 06:06, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I sent you an e-mail explaining this. Andries (talk) 20:39, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXXVII, August 2012

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results

Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content

Book reviews: Nick-D on the legacy of World War II

Op-ed: Bomzibar on German military history

The Bugle is published by the
[majestic titan] 00:37, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

Military history coordinator election

The Military history WikiProject has started its 2012 project coordinator election process, where we will select a team of coordinators to organize the project over the coming year. If you would like to be considered as a candidate, please submit your nomination by 14 September. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact one of the current coordinators on their talk page. This message was delivered here because you are a member of the Military history WikiProject. – Military history coordinators (about the project • what coordinators do) 08:35, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Motion regarding Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Sathya Sai Baba 2

By a vote of 9-0, the Arbitration Committee has passed the following motion:

Remedy 1.1 of the Sathya Sai Baba 2 arbitration case is suspended for three months. During this period, Andries may edit within this topic area, provided that he carefully abides by all applicable policies. After three months, Andries may request that the topic-ban remedy be vacated permanently.

For the Arbitration Committee, NW (Talk) 21:07, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Discuss this

The Bugle: Issue LXXVIII, September 2012

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results

Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content

Book reviews: AustralianRupert on artillery in South Australia, and Nick-D on Venice's empire

Op-ed: Nick-D on the "Kokoda: Beyond the Legend" conference

The Bugle is published by the
[majestic titan] 20:22, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue LXXIX, October 2012

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; milestone for the Fortifications task force; contest results

Articles: The month's new Featured and A-class content

Book reviews: Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/News/October 2012/Hawkeye7 on mission command

Op-ed: The ed17 on how The Bugle could be improved

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Nick-D (talk) and Ian Rose (talk) 02:13, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

Edit War Windows RT, sigh

You might like to take a look. Tuntable (talk) 22:40, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ex-premie for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ex-premie is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ex-premie until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Youreallycan 23:03, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Windows RT

The stupid battle sadly remains. Please have at the Poll in talk. Thanks. Tuntable (talk) 08:27, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:English as a foreign or second language

Category:English as a foreign or second language, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. — Mr. Stradivarius ^{(have a chat)} 07:57, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXXX, November 2012

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: The month's new Featured and A-Class content

Book reviews: Sturmvogel_66, AustralianRupert, and Nick-D look at ships, soldiers, and railways

Op-ed: Nick-D on navigating the FA and A-Class review processes

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 02:12, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

Metatheories

I am open minded to alternative titles of that article. My main concern is preserving the "metatheories of religion" category. Would any of these work for you? If the inclusion of Freud is the issue, perhaps "Behavioral" in the title would help?

Sociological metatheories of religion

Sociological theories of religion

Social metatheories of religion

Social theories of religion

Behavioral and social theories of religion

Greg Bard (talk) 00:32, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Anti-cult terms and concepts

Category:Anti-cult terms and concepts, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 21:34, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXXXI, December 2012

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: The month's new Featured and A-Class content

Book reviews: Simon Harley on British battleships and Nick-D on the French Resistance

Interview: Five editors discuss some less-represented areas of military history

Op-ed: Ian Rose looks back on 2012

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:54, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

Disambiguation link notification for January 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited
William Neuman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject
.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:49, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXXXII, January 2013

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: The month's new Featured and A-Class content

Book reviews: Nick-D looks at Mongol naval power

Op-ed: Crisco 1492 on war films

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:54, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Paul Schnabel

Hello, thanks for creating this article. It's been tagged for notability for 4 years now. Could you look it over and see if you can help? Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 06:59, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Coming from a Dutch perspective, it is obvious when reading the text that he is notable. Andries (talk) 07:52, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXXXIII, February 2013

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content

Book reviews: Nick-D looks at US Army leadership since World War II

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 08:12, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Article notability notification

Hello. This message is to inform you that an article that you wrote recently,
reliable, secondary sources to the article in order to establish the topic's notability. You may find the following links useful when searching for sources: "Minority religion" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images. Thank you for editing Wikipedia! VoxelBot 01:13, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue LXXXIV, March 2013

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content

Book reviews: Nick-D looks at refugees during the Battle of France

Interview: Editors discuss writing articles about the former Yugoslavia

Op-ed: Prioryman on German V-weapon sites and the historian's responsibility

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 04:46, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Proposed deletion of Minority religion

The article Minority religion has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of
WP:NOTABILITY
; essay-like or dictionary-like rather than encyclopedic

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be
deleted for any of several reasons
.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 16:17, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the notice. I have no problem if this article is deleted. I have no intention to improve it, because I do not have time and interest now. I did not remember creating it. Andries (talk) 07:35, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mart Bax, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vendetta (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:42, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXXXV, April 2013

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content

Book reviews: Sturmvogel 66 and Hawkeye7 look at aspects of the Pacific War

Op-ed: ErrantX considers the rabbit hole of research

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 16:08, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue LXXXVI, May 2013

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content

Book reviews: Dumelow on the French Foreign Legion and Nick-D on New Zealand military history

Op-ed: Nick-D on military history tourism

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:01, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue LXXXVII, June 2013

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content

Book reviews: Works on the RNZAF, World War I in the Baltic, and British battleship construction

Op-ed: Anchors Aweigh for the Majestic Titans

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:39, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Dr. Kallam

Salutations, I like your contributions to
Satya Sai Baba, in response to this, wanted to say it seems like a logical thing to do, Should we remove him from the list of followers and just add a mention of him 'praising' Satya Sai Baba? -Ugog Nizdast (talk) 13:57, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Wolf Messing

Arguably a reliable source. I haven't looked at the article in months. If I was going to do anything I might take the time to make the argument.Geni (talk) 17:26, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXXXVIII, July 2013

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content

Book reviews: Nick-D looks at Australia's frontier wars

Interview: What Wikimedia chapters can offer military history editors

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 16:16, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue LXXXIX, August 2013

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content

Book reviews: Nick-D looks at the death of Osama bin Laden

Op-ed: Sturmvogel_66 presents his secrets of prolific contribution

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 00:53, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

WikiProject Military history coordinator election

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Kirill ^[talk] 18:24, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXXXXX, September 2013

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content

Book reviews: Nick-D looks at the American Civil War

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 00:51, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

October 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

|21||[[Greenpeace]]'s research and protest vessel [[MV Arctic Sunrise]] Case (See [[Greenpeace Arctic Sunrise ship case]]|| {{flagicon|Netherlands}} [[Netherlands]] || {{

Thanks,
talk) 07:06, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue XCI, October 2013

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content

Book reviews: Nick-D looks Austro-Hungarian battleships of World War I

Op-ed: Advice on reviewing Featured and A-Class articles

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:36, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Ramtha's School of Enlightenment

Hi Andries. I saw your comment from earlier this month on the New religious movements work group page, but saw that your user page listed you as retired so I didn't reach out to you immediately. I'm wondering if you might actually be around and have time to look over the conversation on the discussion page.
It took me a little while to find some editors interested in discussing improvements to the page and there seemed to be a lot of enthusiasm early on, but now unfortunately the conversation has gone quiet. I just posted a little summary on the discussion page that I think will help get you caught up on what has been discussed and done so far. Do you think that maybe you would have time to look at this? Here is that summary: Summary of discussion Calstarry (talk) 17:34, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue XCII, November 2013

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content

Book reviews: Hawkeye7 looks at US industry in World War II

Op-ed: AustralianRupert offers a soldier's perspective on editing Wikipedia

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 06:46, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

November 2013

Hello, I'm
Polish migrant workers in Western Europe after 1989 may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page
.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

uk-economic-crisis Poland: Immigration to UK is back for good life espite economic crisis] by [[Helen Pidd]] in [[The Guardian]], 27 May 2011

Thanks,
talk) 15:03, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue XCIII, December 2013

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content

Book reviews: Carcharoth and Hawkeye7 look at World War I cemeteries and the British Army in World War II

Interview: Less-represented areas of military history – part 2

Op-ed: TomStar81 and Nick-D look back on 2013 and ahead to 2014

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 00:38, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Disambiguation link notification for December 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited
Atrocity story, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James R. Lewis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject
.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Atrocity stories section

Sorry! I accidentally removed the section while reverting edits by Kitfoxxe. Zambelo (talk) 08:02, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Andries. You have new messages at Ezhiki's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

The Bugle: Issue XCIV, January 2014

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content

Book reviews: Nick-D, Zawed and Hawkeye7 look at recent releases

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:50, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

G. Krugers

Thank you for the addition. I was able to track down an RS and expand a bit on the film (which is extent, to my surprise, and the article I found also has a picture of Krugers, which is awesome). — Crisco 1492 (talk) 22:32, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited
Archbishop of Utrecht (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject
.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue XCV, February 2014

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content

Book reviews: Rabaul in World War II and Australia in World War I

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:57, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue XCVI, March 2014

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content

Book reviews: Hawkeye7 on military command and Nick-D on F-111s in combat

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:38, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Retired

You're obviously still editing - I'd prefer it if you either (a) remove the "retired" notice from your user page or (b) actually retire. Thanks! -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 13:58, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue XCVII, April 2014

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content

Book reviews: Hawkeye7 looks at Britain's War Machine

Interview: Article writers discuss German military history

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:59, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue XCVIII, May 2014

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content

Book reviews: Nick-D looks at The Lost Boys of Anzac

Op-ed: Peacemaker67 on Featured Articles involving Yugoslavia in World War II

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:50, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue XCIX, June 2014

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content

Book reviews: Nick-D looks at life aboard a US aircraft carrier and Hawkeye7 considers the role of food in World War II

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:41, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue C, July 2014

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content

Book reviews: Jonas Vinther and Nick-D look at examples of electronic media

Op-ed: TomStar81 on the shot heard around the world

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 03:47, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue CI, August 2014

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content

Book reviews: Wrap-up of some recent external reviews

Interview: World War I editors

Op-ed: TomStar81 on the outbreak of World War I

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:23, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Erlendur Haraldsson

I understand your concerns. I will be doing some edits on this shortly, ones that you even may be pleased with, so far now can you just wait and leave the Lippard reference. I aim to have this completed by Wednesday. I will add in about six or seven sources to solve this issue. Goblin Face (talk) 13:36, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I will wait. I would be pleasantly surprized if you were able to find good new sources. Please note that in the past mere web-based critics of Sathya Sai Baba were found to be insufficiently reliable. Again, I do not want to minimize criticism and I even proposed some critical sources, but the sources have to pass a minimum of reliability and quality. Andries (talk) 17:17, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Materialization (paranormal) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Materialization (paranormal) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Materialization (paranormal) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. LuckyLouie (talk) 12:29, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Comment

Based on your comments here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Avoiding_harm, I am interested in having your feedback/criticism dialogue here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Village_pump_(policy)#Guideline_for_crime_victims_of_world_wide_significance MeropeRiddle (talk) 10:53, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CII, September 2014

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content

Book reviews: Hawkeye7 looks at the military history of Austria-Hungary

Timeleine: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 02:24, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

WikiProject Military history coordinator election

Greetings from
[majestic titan] 22:06, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue CIII, October 2014

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content

Book review: Nick-D on Britain in the French Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars

Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:32, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue CIII, October 2014, Redux

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content

Book reviews: Nick-D on Britain in the French Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars

Timeline: This month in World War I

NOTE: This replaces the earlier October 2014 Bugle message, which had incorrect links -- please ignore/delete the previous message. Thank uou!

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 01:52, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue CIV, November 2014

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content

Book reviews: Nick-D looks at Nazi Germany's Eastern Front allies

Op-ed: TomStar81 on the origins and legacy of trench warfare

Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:27, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Nominations for the Military history Wikiproject's Historian and Newcomer of the Year Awards are now open!

The Military history Wikiproject has opened nominations for the Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year. Nominations will be accepted until 13 December at 23:59 GMT, with voting to begin at 0:00 GMT 14 December. The voting will conclude on 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:35, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the Military history Wikiproject's Historian and Newcomer of the Year Awards are now open!

The Military history Wikiproject has opened nominations for the Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year. Nominations will be accepted until 13 December at 23:59 GMT, with voting to begin at 0:00 GMT 14 December. The voting will conclude on 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:40, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This message was accidentally sent using an incorrect mailing list, therefore this message is being resent using the correct list. As a result, some users may get this message twice; if so please discard. We apologize for the inconvenience.

Voting for the Military historian and Military newcomer of the year now open!

Nominations for the military historian of the year and military newcomer of the year have now closed, and voting for the candidates has officially opened. All project members are invited to cast there votes for the Military historian and Military newcomer of the year candidates before the elections close at 23:59 December 21st. For the coordinators, TomStar81
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CV, December 2014

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content

Book reviews: Hawkeye7 on armoured reconnaissance and German scientists, Nick-D on time travelling historians

Op-ed: TomStar81 looks at the World War I Christmas truce

Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:51, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Global account

Hi Andries! As a
ping me with {{ping|DerHexer}}. Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 16:51, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue CVI, January 2015

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content

Book reviews: Jonas Vinther on Hitler and Cliftonian on the Rhodesia Regiment

Interview: 2014 Military History Newcomer Award nominees

Review essay: Nick-D on the Australian War Memorial

Op-ed: TomStar81 on the birth of strategic bombing

Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:27, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue CVII, February 2015

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content

Book review: Nick-D on the British Pacific Fleet

Op-ed: TomStar81 looks at the advent of chemical warfare

Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:50, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Personal matter

I noticed you remarked that there is a huge delay in Russian post on the related article. I was hoping you might be able to tell me how long it would take for a letter to go from Moscow to Kursk. Best regards,
speak to me!) 20:06, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue CVIII, March 2015

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content

Book review: Recent external reviews

Review essay: Nick-D on the Australian Fleet Air Arm Museum

Op-ed: TomStar81 on submarine warfare in World War I

Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:36, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue CIX, April 2015

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content

Book reviews: Nick-D looks at the landing at Anzac Cove

Op-ed: TomStar81 on the debut of poison gas in World War I

Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 06:31, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue CX, May 2015

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content

Book review: Recent external reviews

Op-ed: TomStar81 and Simon Harley on the sinking of the Lusitania

Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 00:05, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue CXI, June 2015

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content

Book review: Recent external reviews

Op-ed: TomStar81 on the new technology of World War I

Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:38, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue CXII, July 2015

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content

Book review: Recent external reviews

Review essay: Nick-D on sourcing articles about bombing a battleship

Op-ed: TomStar81 on the role of nursing in World War I

Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:34, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Airbus a380 emergency landing listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect
ChampionMan1234 05:47, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

August 2015

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Russian grammar may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)

| ЗА-<br />Movement behind an object; stopping off on the way<

Past perfect: Меня́ уби́ли (I have been killed) ) or (They) have killed me)

nominative case, followed by "быть" - "to be" to indicate tense, followed by a short-form {{fact}} {{adjective (in English - Participle II)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow
talk) 19:59, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue CXIII, August 2015

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content

Book reviews: Nick-D on the Second Schleswig War

Interview: Featured picture participants

Op-ed: TomStar81 on Indian nationalism during World War I

Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:45, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Category:Anti-cult terms and concepts

fgnievinski (talk) 05:50, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue CXIV, September 2015

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors, coordinator elections have begun

Articles: Abbasids to a Yugoslav monitor

Book reviews: Economics of warfare, Japan, and light horse

Op-ed: We can (not) advance

Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 05:08, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

WikiProject Military history coordinator election

Greetings from
[majestic titan] 05:20, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue CXV, October 2015

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content

Book review: Anotherclown and Sturmvogel 66 on war in the air and at sea

Review essay: Auntieruth55 on the French Revolutionary Wars

Op-ed: TomStar81 on the entry of Bulgaria in World War I

Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 21:46, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue CXVI, November 2015

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-Class content

Book review: Hawkeye7 on the Battle of the Bulge

Op-ed: TomStar81 looks at the collapse of the Serbian Army in World War I

Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 03:25, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:15, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Nominations for the Military history WikiProject historian and newcomer of the year awards now open!

On behalf of the Military history WikiProject's Coordinators, we would like to extend an invitation to nominate deserving editors for the 2015 Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards. The nomination period will run from 7 December to 23:59 13 December, with the election phase running from 14 December to 23:59 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:05, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CXVII, December 2015

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-Class content

Book review: Hawkeye7 on the German retreat from France in 1944

Op-ed: TomStar81 on empires of World War I

Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 05:06, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

File:Kristallnacht example of physical damage.jpg listed for discussion

Stefan2 (talk) 01:07, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply
]
The Bugle: Issue CXVIII, January 2016

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content

Book review: Nick-D on Jefferson Davis; Hawkeye7 on Australia's war in Vietnam

Op-ed: TomStar81 discusses British World War I conscription

Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:23, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue CXIX, February 2016

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-Class content

Book review: Hawkeye7 on nuclear weapons in Britain and Nick-D on Australia's war in the Pacific

Op-ed: TomStar81 looks at the Kamurun Campaign of 1914–16

Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:14, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue CXX, March 2016

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-Class content

Book review: Hawkeye7 discusses a Panzer general and a "mercenary mum"

Op-ed: TomStar81 on the terrible battles of 1916

Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:15, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue CXXI, April 2016

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content

Book review: Hawkeye7 on Australian spies, Nick-D on the German Army

Op-ed: TomStar81 on the 1916 Easter Rising

Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 01:38, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue CXXII, May–June 2016

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content

Book review: Hawkeye7 on Australian spies (part two)

Op-ed: TomStar81 looks at the Battle of Jutland

Timeline: Events of World War I

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:05, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue CXXIII, July 2016

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content

Book review: Nick-D on the Australian Imperial Force

Op-ed: TomStar81 looks at the Battle of the Somme

Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:44, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

July 2016

Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:09, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue CXXIV, August 2016

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content

Book review: Hawkeye7 looks at disease control and defence satellites

Op-ed: TomStar81 on the rise of air power

Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 07:57, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

Proposed deletion of Effervescence (disambiguation)

The article Effervescence (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unnecessary disambiguation page per
WP:TWODABS
; a hatnote is sufficient

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be
deleted for any of several reasons
.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Tavix ^(talk) 16:48, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CXXV, September 2016

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content

Book review: Peacemaker67 and Nick-D on Nazi terror and covert warfare

Op-ed: Hawkeye7 looks at Australians on the Somme

Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:27, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

Military history WikiProject coordinator election

Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway, and as a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 23 September. For the Coordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:00, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CXXVI, October 2016

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content

Book review: Nick-D and Hawkeye7 look at recent works

Op-ed: TomStar81 on the evolution of the tank

Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:17, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue CXXVII, November 2016

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content

Book review: Hawkeye7 looks at two new books on the US military

Interview: A chat with our new project coordinators

Review essay: Nick-D discusses recent works on the British and Australian Armies in World War I

Op-ed: TomStar81 on the end of the Battle of the Somme

Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:30, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

ArbCom Elections 2016
: Voting now open!

Hello, Andries. Voting in the
2016 Arbitration Committee elections
is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page.

ArbCom Elections 2016
: Voting now open!

Hello, Andries. Voting in the
2016 Arbitration Committee elections
is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CXXVIII, December 2016

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content

Book review: Hawkeye7 looks at America's nuclear capability at the start of the Cold War

Review essay: Hawkeye7 on the Manhatten Project suite of articles

Op-ed: TomStar81 discusses leadership changes in World War I

Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:09, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

Voting for the Military history WikiProject Historian and Newcomer of the Year is ending soon!

Time is running out to voting for the Military Historian and Newcomer of the year! If you have not yet cast a vote, please consider doing so soon. The voting will end on 31 December at 23:59 UTC, with the presentation of the awards to the winners and runners up to occur on 1 January 2017. For the Military history WikiProject Coordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:00, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This message was sent as a courtesy reminder to all active members of the Military History WikiProject.

The Bugle: Issue CXXIX, January 2017

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content

Book review: Hawkeye7 and Nick-D look at three recent works

Op-ed: TomStar81 on a curious episode of World War I

Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:07, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue CXXX, February 2017

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content

Book review: Recent external reviews

Op-ed: TomStar81 looks at submarine warfare in World War I

Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 04:45, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

Your draft article, Draft:Harald Merckelbach

Hello, Andries. It has been over six months since you last edited your
Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Harald Merckelbach
".
In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission
and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at
this link
. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:07, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March Madness 2017

G'day all, please be advised that throughout March 2017 the Military history Wikiproject is running its March Madness drive. This is a backlog drive that is focused on several key areas:

tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope

updating the project's currently listed A-class articles to ensure their ongoing compliance with the listed criteria

creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various task force pages or other lists of missing articles.

As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.
The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the military history scope will be considered eligible. More information can be found here for those that are interested, and members can sign up as participants at that page also.
The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 March and runs until 23:59 UTC on 31 March 2017, so please sign up now.
For the Milhist co-ordinators. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) & MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:24, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CXXXI, March 2017

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content

Book review: Hawkeye7 and Nick-D look at works on two facets of US military power

Op-ed: TomStar81 on the Russian Revolution

Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:20, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue CXXXII, April 2017

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content

Book review: Nick-D and Hawkeye7 look at air power and nuclear weaponry

Op-ed: Hawkeye7 on Australia's part in the advance on the Hindenburg Line

Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:50, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

Discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CESNUR

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CESNUR. NeilN ^{talk to me} 14:38, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CXXXIII, May 2017

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content

Book review: Hawkeye7 on Strategic Air Command doctrine

Op-ed: Tomstar81 looks at a little-known aspect of World War I

Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 03:01, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue CXXXIV, June 2017

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content

Book review: Hawkeye7 looks at the Battle of Kokoda and US defence acquisition in the 1960s

Op-ed: Hawkeye7 on the Battle of Messines

Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:52, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue CXXXV, July 2017

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content

Book review: Nick-D looks at planning for the unthinkable

Op-ed: TomStar81 on Russia's Provisional Government in World War I

Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 07:34, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue CXXXVI, August 2017

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content

Book review: Hawkeye7 on the Battle of Messines and recent Australian Army leadership; Nick-D on South African armour

Op-ed: Nick-D talks photography

Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:37, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue CXXXVII, September 2017

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content

Book review: Nick-D and Hawkeye7 look at two recent releases

Op-ed: Hawkeye7 on ANZACs in the Third Ypres Offensive

Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:32, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

2017 Military history WikiProject Coordinator election

Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway. As a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 29 September. Thank you for your time. For the current tranche of Coordinators, AustralianRupert (talk) 10:39, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CXXXVIII, October 2017

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content

Book review: Nick-D and Hawkeye7 look at Australian involvement on the Western Front in 1918 and in post-war New Guinea

Op-ed: TomStar81 on the October Revolution

Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:42, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue CXXXIX, November 2017

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content

Book review: Recent external reviews

Op-ed: TomStar81 on late 1917 naval warfare

Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:29, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Andries. Voting in the
2017 Arbitration Committee elections
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

2017 Military Historian of the Year and Newcomer of the Year nominations and voting

As we approach the end of the year, the Military History project is looking to recognise editors who have made a real difference. Each year we do this by bestowing two awards: the Military Historian of the Year and the Military History Newcomer of the Year. The co-ordinators invite all project members to get involved by nominating any editor they feel merits recognition for their contributions to the project. Nominations for both awards are open between 00:01 on 2 December 2017 and 23:59 on 15 December 2017. After this, a 14-day voting period will follow commencing at 00:01 on 16 December 2017. Nominations and voting will take place on the main project talkpage: here and here. Thank you for your time. For the co-ordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:35, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CXL, December 2017

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content

Book review: Recent external reviews

Op-ed: TomStar81 on the Halifax Explosion of 1917

Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:16, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

User group for Military Historians

Greetings,
"Military history" is one of the most important subjects when speak of sum of all human knowledge. To support contributors interested in the area over various language Wikipedias, we intend to form a user group. It also provides a platform to share the best practices between military historians, and various military related projects on Wikipedias. An initial discussion was has been done between the coordinators and members of WikiProject Military History on English Wikipedia. Now this discussion has been taken to Meta-Wiki. Contributors intrested in the area of military history are requested to share their feedback and give suggestions at Talk:Discussion to incubate a user group for Wikipedia Military Historians.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:29, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CXLI, January 2018

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content

Book review: Hawkeye7 looks at tropical medicine and Operation Market Garden

Op-ed: Hawkeye7 on US Army doctrine in World War I

Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:15, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue CXLII, February 2018

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content

Book review: Nick-D on the Napoleonic Wars and Hawkeye7 on World War II

Op-ed: Hawkeye7 on generalship in 1918

Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 07:16, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue CXLIII, March 2018

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content

Book review: Hawkeye7 looks at a work by Daniel Ellsberg

Op-ed: TomStar81 on the 1918 flu pandemic

Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 10:35, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

April 2018 Milhist Backlog Drive

G'day all, please be advised that throughout April 2018 the Military history Wikiproject is running its annual backlog elimination drive. This will focus on several key areas:

tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope

adding or improving listed resources on Milhist's task force pages

updating the open tasks template on Milhist's task force pages

creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various lists of missing articles.

As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.
The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the scope of military history will be considered eligible. This year, the Military history project would like to extend a specific welcome to members of Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red, and we would like to encourage all participants to consider working on helping to improve our coverage of women in the military. This is not the sole focus of the edit-a-thon, though, and there are aspects that hopefully will appeal to pretty much everyone.
The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 April and runs until 23:59 UTC on 30 April 2018. Those interested in participating can sign up here.
For the Milhist co-ordinators, AustralianRupert and MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:53, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CXLIIV, April 2018

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content

Book review: Nick-D looks at the bombing of Darwin; recent books by female military historians

Review essay: K.e.coffman on Wikipedia's representations of the Nazi German military

Op-ed: TomStar81 on the Red Baron

Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:55, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue CXLIV, May 2018

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content

Book review: Hawkeye7 looks at coalitions and logistics in World War II, and Nick-D at Australia's frontier wars

Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:00, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

Copyright problem: List of titles and names of Krishna

Hello, and
welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as List of titles and names of Krishna, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images from either web sites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from http://astrology.aryabhatt.com/108_Names_Krishna.asp, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked
from editing.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author to release the text under the
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:List of titles and names of Krishna and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, List of titles and names of Krishna, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission
for instructions.

If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the
GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:List of titles and names of Krishna. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials
for instructions.

If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:List of titles and names of Krishna
with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow
Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines
.
If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:List of titles and names of Krishna saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.
Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Batternut (talk) 10:56, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CXLVI, June 2018

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content

Book review: Recent external reviews

Op-ed: TomStar81 on a supergun of World War I

Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 10:35, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue CXLVII, July 2018

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content

Book review: This month's external reviews

Op-ed: TomStar81 on the murder of the Romanovs

Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:11, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue CXLVIII, August 2018

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content

Book review: Nick-D looks at a classic US official history

Op-ed: TomStar81 on belated declarations of war in 1916–18

Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 08:35, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Cheers, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CXLIX, September 2018

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content

Book review: Indy Beetle and Nick-D on the Katangese Gendarmes and India during World War II

Op-ed: TomStar81 looks at two important treaties of World War I

Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:19, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced

G'day everyone, voting for the 2018 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced

G'day everyone, voting for the 2018 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:22, 15 September 2018 (UTC) Note: the previous version omitted a link to the election page, therefore you are receiving this follow up message with a link to the election page to correct the previous version. We apologies for any inconvenience that this may have caused.[reply]

Have your say!

Hi everyone, just a quick reminder that voting for the WikiProject Military history coordinator election closes soon. You only have a day or so left to have your say about who should make up the coordination team for the next year. If you have already voted, thanks for participating! If you haven't and would like to, vote here before 23:59 UTC on 28 September. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:28, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CL, October 2018

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content

Book review: Nick-D looks at the use of so-called "substandard" manpower in armies

Interview: On the Bugle turning 150 (issues that is!)

Op-ed: TomStar81 on the collapse of empires at the close of World War I

Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 07:00, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue CLI, November 2018

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content

Book review: Peacemaker67 looks at the Sydney Wars

Op-ed: TomStar81 on the end of World War I

Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:39, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Andries. Voting in the
2018 Arbitration Committee elections
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Andries. Voting in the
2018 Arbitration Committee elections
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations now open for "Military historian of the year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" awards

Nominations for our annual Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards are open until 23:59 (GMT) on 15 December 2018. Why don't you nominate the editors who you believe have made a real difference to the project in 2018? MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:26, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CLII, December 2018

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content

Book review: Recent external reviews

Op-ed: Indy beetle looks at military newspapers in East Africa

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 10:33, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

Voting now open for "Military historian of the year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" awards

Voting for our annual Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards is open until 23:59 (GMT) on 30 December 2018. Why don't you vote for the editors who you believe have made a real difference to Wikipedia's coverage of military history in 2018? MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:16, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CLIII, January 2019

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content

Book review: Nick-D looks at Albert Speer

Op-ed: Factotem on common problems affecting infoboxes

Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:57, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue CLIV, February 2019

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content

Book review: Recent external reviews

Review essay: Nick-D on the Japanese battleship Mikasa

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:18, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue CLV, March 2019

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content

Book review: Hawkeye7 on US Navy aviation safety and Australian war crimes trials

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 10:59, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue CLVI, April 2019

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content

Book review: Peacemaker67, Nick-D and Hawkeye7 look at three books focussing on the World Wars

Op-ed: Indy Beetle on the fall of Idi Amin

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 21:59, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue CLVII, May 2019

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content

Book review: Hawkeye7 on Australia's leadership and medical services in World War II and Peacemaker67 on Israel's targeted assassinations

Op-ed: TomStar81 looks at the fate of the German fleet at Scapa Flow

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:03, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue CLVIII, June 2019

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content

Book review: Nick-D looks at the Dambusters, and Hawkeye7 at Allied code breakers and Australia in New Guinea and Vietnam

Op-ed: TomStar81 on the treaty that ended World War I

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:07, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue CLIX, July 2019

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content

Book review: Haweye7, Peacemaker67 and Nick-D on recent books covering the world wars

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:00, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue CLX, August 2019

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content

Book review: Hawkeye7 and Peacemaker67 look at Italian, German and Australian forces in World War II

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:40, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue CLX, August 2019

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content

Book review: Hawkeye7 and Peacemaker67 look at Italian, German and Australian forces in World War II

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:41, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

Backlog Banzai

In the month of September,
Wikiproject Military history is running a project-wide edit-a-thon, Backlog Banzai. There are heaps of different areas you can work on, for which you claim points, and at the end of the month all sorts of whiz-bang awards will be handed out. Every player wins a prize! There is even a bit of friendly competition built in for those that like that sort of thing. Sign up now at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/September 2019 Backlog Banzai to take part. For the coordinators, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:17, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:37, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced

G'day everyone, voting for the 2019 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 03:37, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CLXI, September 2019

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content

Book review: Nick-D looks at the legacy of World War II

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:17, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election half-way mark

G'day everyone, the voting for the XIX Coordinator Tranche is at the halfway mark. The candidates have answered various questions, and you can check them out to see why they are running and decide whether you support them. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 07:36, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CLXII, October 2019

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content

Book review: Hawkeye7 and Nick-D look at three works

Op-ed: Hawkeye7 on writing a military biography

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:40, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue CLXIII, November 2019

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content

Book review: Willbb234 on Allied pilots, Hawkeye7 on the defence of Australia and logistics in Indochina, Nick-D on Australian commandos

Op-ed: Hawkeye7 reports back on a high-profile history symposium

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 21:44, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review
NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue CLXIV, December 2019

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content

Book review: Hawkeye7 and Nick-D look at works on aspects of the Second World War and Cold War

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:47, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue CLXV, January 2020

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content

Book review: Hawkeye7 on Jim Mattis

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:56, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: IssueICLXVI, February 2020

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content

Book review: Nick-D looks at a failed German counterattack in the Battle of Normandy

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:04, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

March Madness 2020

G'day all, March Madness 2020 is about to get underway, and there is bling aplenty for those who want to get stuck into the backlog by way of tagging, assessing, updating, adding or improving resources and creating articles. If you haven't already signed up to participate, why not? The more the merrier! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:19, 29 February 2020 (UTC) for the coord team[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CLXVII, March 2020

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content

Book review: Recent external reviews

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 01:51, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue CLXVIII, April 2020

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content

Book review: Hawkeye7 looks at the logistics behind the Crusades and the USAF's early Cold War nuclear deterrant

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 05:21, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue CLXIX, May 2020

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content

Book review: Nick-D and Hawkeye7 look at fortifications, the German Army, and post-Cold War conflict

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:02, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue CLXX, June 2020

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content

Book review: Nick-D looks at the naval siege of Japan in 1945

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 04:21, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue CLXXI, July 2020

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content

Book review: Nick-D on Hadrian's Wall and Hawkeye7 on the British military

Op-ed: Nick-D on diversity and military history

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:45, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue CLXXII, August 2020

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content

Book review: Recent external reviews

Op-ed: Nick-D on 1945

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:29, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:03, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue Issue CLXXIII, September 2020

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content

Book review: Recent external reviews

Review Essay: Nick-D on the Historical Aircraft Restoration Society

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:52, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced

G'day everyone, voting for the 2020 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2020. Thanks from the outgoing coord team, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 05:17, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CLXXIV, October 2020

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content

Book review: Nick-D on Franklin Roosevelt in World War II and Hog Farm on the Battle of Chancellorsville

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:21, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue CLXXV, November 2020

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content

Book review: Nick-D & Hawkeye7 look at two aspects of 20th Century warfare

Op-ed: TomStar81 on the Unknown Soldiers

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:50, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review
NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:15, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Nominations for the 2020 Military history WikiProject Newcomer and Historian of the Year awards now open

G'day all, the nominations for the 2020 Military history WikiProject newcomer and Historian of the Year are open, all editors are encouraged to nominate candidates for the awards before until 23:59 (GMT) on 15 December 2020, after which voting will occur for 14 days. There is not much time left to nominate worthy recipients, so get to it! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 06:45, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CLXXVI, December 2020

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content

Book review: Nick-D looks at the war in Ukraine

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:48, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Voting for "Military Historian of the Year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" closing

G'day all, voting for the WikiProject Military history "Military Historian of the Year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" is about to close, so if you haven't already, click on the links and have your say before 23:59 (GMT) on 30 December! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 23:34, 28 December 2020 (UTC) for the coord team[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CLXXVII, January 2021

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content

Book review: Hawkeye7 looks Australian artillery in World War I

Op-ed: Hawkeye7 on no-win scenarios

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 00:06, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue CLXXVIII, February 2021

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content

Book review: Works on the Gallipoli Campaign, Battle of Perryville and US 1st Infantry Division

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:57, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue CLXXVIII, February 2021

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content

Book review: Works on the Gallipoli Campaign, Battle of Perryville and US 1st Infantry Division

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:01, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue CLXXIX, March 2021

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content

Book review: Hawkeye7 on female computers, Nick-D on the Israeli Defence Forces

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:56, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive

Hey y'all, the
Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_History/April 2021 Reviewing Drive#Participants and create a worklist at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/April 2021 Reviewing Drive/Worklists (examples are given). Further details can be found at the drive page. Questions can be asked at the drive talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:22, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue CLXXX, April 2021

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content

Book review: Hawkeye7 on Montgomery's doctrine and Nick-D on Mussolini's wars

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 02:08, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue CLXXXI, May 2021

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content

Book review: Nick- D and Hawkeye7 look at intelligence gathering, doctrine and strategy

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 00:57, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue CLXXXII, June 2021

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content

Book review: Nick-D on RAAF aircraft, Hawkeye7 on mission command and nuclear secrecy

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 03:06, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue CLXXXIII, July 2021

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content

Book review: Peacemaker67 and Nick-D on World War I

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:29, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue CLXXXIV, August 2021

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content

Book review: Hawkeye7 on Commonwealth armies and an Australian spy, Nick-D on the American Revolutionary War and RAAF mine laying

Op-ed: RobDuch on United States coastal defenses

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:48, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:58, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nomination period closing soon

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are still open, but not for long. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! No further nominations will be accepted after that time. Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:42, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Military history coordinator election voting has commenced

Hey y'all, voting for the 2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted at the 2021 tranche page itself. Appropriate questions for the candidates can also be asked. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:38, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CLXXXV, September 2021

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content

Book review: Hawkeye7 on Australia and the UK in Iraq and Afghanistan

Op-ed: Nick-D on writing about military procurement

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:58, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue CLXXXV, September 2021

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content

Book review: Hawkeye7 on Australia and the UK in Iraq and Afghanistan

Op-ed: Nick-D on writing about military procurement

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:02, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting period closing soon

Hey y'all, voting for the 2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche will be closing soon. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted at the 2021 tranche page itself. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:31, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Teresa Salgueiro for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Teresa Salgueiro is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teresa Salgueiro (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Rathfelder (talk) 17:59, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The Bugle: Issue CLXXV, October 2021

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content

Book review: Nick-D on British conscription and German warship raiders

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:51, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue CLXXVI, November 2021

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content

Book review: Hawkeye7 on Canadian junior officers in World War II

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:25, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Survey about History on Wikipedia

I am Petros Apostolopoulos, a Ph.D. candidate in Public History at North Carolina State University. My Ph.D. project examines how historical knowledge is produced on Wikipedia. If you are interested in participating in my research study by offering your own experience of writing about history on Wikipedia, you can click on this link https://ncsu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9z4wmR1cIp0qBH8. There are minimal risks involved in this research.
If you have any questions, please let me know. Petros Apostolopoulos, [email protected] Apolo1991 (talk) 10:30, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CLXXVII, December 2021

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content

Book review: Nick-D on the Franklin–Nashville campaign

Review essay: Military History Wikiproject Coordinators' reading list

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:09, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue CLXXVIII, January 2022

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content

Book review: Nick-D on the Australian Army in Somalia

Review essay: Hog Farm on American Civil War sites in the South and Midwest

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:44, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue CLXXVIV, February 2022

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content

Book review: Hawkeye7 and Nick-D on World War II in Europe

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:22, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Rejuvenate WikiProject Skepticism

Hello - my name is Susan Gerbic (Sgerbic) and I'm writing to you because at some point you joined Wikipedia:WikiProject Skepticism. This might have been months ago - or even years ago. With the best of intentions the project was created years ago, and sadly like many WikiProjects has started to go dormant. A group of us are attempting to revitalize the Skepticism project, already we have begun to clean up the main page and I've just redone the participant page. No one is in charge of this project, it is member directed, which might have been the reason it almost went dormant. We are attempting to bring back conversations on the talk page and have two subprojects as well, in the hopes that it might spark involvement and a way of getting to know each other better. One was created several years ago but is very well organized and a lot of progress was made, Wikipedia:WikiProject Skepticism/Skeptical organisations in Europe. The other I created a couple weeks ago, it is very simple and has a silly name Wikipedia:WikiProject Skepticism/Skepticism Stub Sub-Project Project (SSSPP). This sub-project runs from March 1 to June 1, 2022. We are attempting to rewrite skepticism stubs and add them to this list. As you can see we have already made progress.
The reason I'm writing to you now is because we would love to have you come back to the project and become involved, either by working on one of the sub-projects, proposing your own (and managing it), or just hanging out on the talk page getting to know the other editors and maybe donate some of your wisdom to some of the conversations. As I said, no one is in charge, so if you have something in mind you would like to see done, please suggest it on the talk page and hopefully others will agree. Please add the project to your watchlist, update your personal user page showing you are a proud member of WikiProject Skepticism. And DIVE in, this is what the work list looks like [3] frightening at first glance, but we have already started chipping away at it.
The Wikipedia:WikiProject Skepticism/Participants page has gone though a giant change - you may want to update your information. And of course if this project no longer interests you, please remove your name from the participant list, we would hate to see you go, but completely understand.
Thank you for your time, I hope to edit with you in the future.Sgerbic (talk) 06:48, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CLXXVII, March 2022

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content

Book review: Nick-D on Hitler as a military leader

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:14, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue CLXXVIII, April 2022

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content

Book review: Hawkeye7 on military logistics and rebuilding Nagasaki

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:22, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue CXCIII, May 2022

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content

Book review: Hawkeye7 on a World War II summit and the American space program

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:54, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

You have been pruned from a list

Hi Andries! You're receiving this notification because you were previously listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Members, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over 3 months.
Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the list. If you would like to resubscribe, you can do so at any time by visiting Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Members.
Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:28, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CXCIV, June 2022

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content

Book review: Hawkeye7 and Nick-D look at four recent works

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:42, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue CXCVI, July 2022

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content

Book review: Hawkeye7 on Falklands War artillery and Nick-D on the Battle of the Ruhr

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 20:27, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue CXCVII, August 2022

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content

Book review: Hawkeye7 on the Falklands War

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 08:57, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations opening soon

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are opening in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 1 September). A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:51, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting opening soon!

Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election opens in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 15 September) and will last through 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:26, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Correction to previous election announcement

Just a quick correction to the prior message about the 2022 MILHIST coordinator election! I (Hog Farm) didn't proofread the message well enough and left out a link to the election page itself in this message. The voting will occur here; sorry about the need for a second message and the inadvertent omission from the prior one. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:40, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting closing soon

Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election closes soon, at 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. The voting itself is occurring here If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:12, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CXCVIII, September 2022

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content

Book review: Hawkeye7 on Australian military leadership and Nick-D on the First Crusade's Byzantine connection

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 21:30, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue CXCVIII, October 2022

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content

Book review: Recent external reviews

Op-ed: Meet some of the project coordinators

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:37, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue CXCIX, November 2022

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content

Book review: Nick-D on the 1991 Gulf War air campaign

Op-ed: Meet some more of the coordinators

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 10:31, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the
2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue CC, December 2022

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content

Book review: Nick-D looks at British Territorials in India

Interview: On turning 200 (issues of the Bugle!)

Review essay: Coordinators' 2022 reading list

Op-ed: Meet some more of the coordinators

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:55, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

"Sanathana Sarathi (title of Krishna)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect
Sanathana Sarathi (title of Krishna) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 20 § Sanathana Sarathi (title of Krishna) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 15:26, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

"Sanatana Sarathi" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Sanatana Sarathi and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 22 § Sanatana Sarathi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 10:30, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue 201, January 2023

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content

Book review: Hawkeye7 on the key contributions of two Australian scientists in World War II

Review essay: Nick-D reports on his recent visits to British military sites

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 19:44, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue 202, February 2023

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content

Book review: Hawkeye7 on translation and Eisenhower's armies

Review essay: Catlemur on military museums in Athens

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:25, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue 203, March 2023

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content

Book review: Hog Farm on the Trans-Mississippi Theater of the American Civil War

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 21:28, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue 204, April 2023

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content

Book review: Nick-D on the Australian War Memorial and the South China Sea raid, Hawkeye7 on the 1999 East Timor intervention

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 21:29, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue 205, May 2023

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content

Book review: Hawkeye7 on the Western Allied invasion of Germany

Op-ed: Hawkeye7's tips for writing articles on military logistics

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:33, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue 205, May 2023

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content

Book review: Hawkeye7 on the Western Allied invasion of Germany

Op-ed: Hawkeye7's tips for writing articles on military logistics

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 08:04, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue 206, June 2023

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content

Book review: Hawkeye7 and Nick-D review three recent works

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 18:29, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue 207, July 2023

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content

Book review: Nick-D on alleged Australian war crimes and Hawkeye7 on the 1944–45 Philippines campaign and the Australian Signals Directorate

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 19:57, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue 208, August 2023

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content

Book review: Recent external reviews

Op-ed: Adam Cuerden on finding and using images

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:28, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:04, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue 209, September 2023

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content

Book review: Recent external reviews

Op-ed: Hawkeye7 on the Oppenheimer biopic

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 21:35, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue 210, October 2023

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content

Book review: Hawkeye7 on an American general and the first female astronauts, Nick-D on Roman fortifications

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 19:24, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Prem Rawat: Contentious topic designation removed

Hello Andries,
As a very late update to the
contentious topic designation, previously "discretionary sanctions", originally "article probation", has been removed following a successful request for amendment.

Any actions previously taken in accordance with the contentious topic designation remain in force and are governed by the
contentious topics procedure
.
This notification may be mostly unnecessary, but as you had been a party to the original case, I thought you might be interested in hearing that after about 15 years, this remnant has been removed. Until today, it was listed at Wikipedia:General sanctions § Arbitration Committee-authorised sanctions.
Best regards,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:37, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue 211, November 2023

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content

Book review: Hawkeye7 looks at English Civil War logistics and Peacemaker67 at Austro-Hungarian torpedo boats

Op-ed: Hawkeye7 on how WP:SIZE matters

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 18:17, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue 212, December 2023

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content

Book review: Nick-D looks at the Russian invasion of Ukraine

Op-ed: Nick-D on writing Rhodesian military articles

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:59, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Voting for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023 is now open!

Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023! The the top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki . Cast your votes vote here and here respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2023. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. Hawkeye7 (talk · contribs) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:55, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue 213, January 2024

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content

Book review: Hawkeye7 looks at three diverse works

Op-ed: Hawkeye7 on the state of the Wikiproject

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 18:31, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue 214, February 2024

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content

Book review: Hawkeye7 and Pickersgill-Cunliffe review four books

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 19:08, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue 215, March 2024

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content

Book review: Hawkeye7 and Nick-D look at four recent works

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:56, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue 216, April 2024

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content

Book review: Hawkeye7, Nick-D and Pickersgill-Cunliffe discuss six (count 'em, six!) works comprising eight volumes

Op-ed: Hawkeye7 on a lecture by the Australian official historian

The Bugle is published by the
this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:08, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Proposed deletion of Gravity (Twitter client)

The article Gravity (Twitter client) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not independently notable – no reason to exist separately from Twitter

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be
deleted for any of several reasons
.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the
talk) 10:01, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]