User talk:BegbertBiggs

Welcome to BegbertBiggs's talk page. I will generally respond here to comments that are posted here, rather than replying via your talk page (or the article's talk page, if you are writing to me here about an article), so you may want to watch this page until you are responded to, or let me know where specifically you'd prefer the reply.

Archives

Archive 1

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Hi, thank you for acting as closer in this discussion. Note that some link-fixing is required [1]; I've done quite a few, but would appreciate if you could jump in as well. 162 etc. (talk) 16:18, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You're right, I'll go over it with AWB. BegbertBiggs (talk) 17:29, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Great! I'll have to learn how to use this AWB one day. Thank you! 162 etc. (talk) 19:15, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Charlize Rule (footballer) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 4 § Charlize Rule (footballer) until a consensus is reached. Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 13:07, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion has been quickly closed in case you have not noticed. No need to worry about this at all. Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 17:50, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@BegbertBiggs: Why was this article moved when there was no consensus rfc. The ultra decrypts were likely the most important thing of the 20th century. Why was that moved. It is clearly the primary topic. scope_creep^Talk 08:33, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Scope creep: There was in fact consensus to make the move at the RM here: Talk:Ultra (cryptography)#Requested move 18 November 2023 BegbertBiggs (talk) 12:09, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bit of a marathon, thanks. ;O) Keith-264 (talk) 09:56, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

You moved this article, which appeared to be a

The comment of it being a BLP was provided by

WP:RMT. Admittedly I didn't check that it's actually a living person, but I moved it back to draft space anyway because I agreed that it clearly isn't ready for article space. BegbertBiggs (talk) 23:56, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Yes. I agree that you were reasonable in draftifying it on request. It's more complicated than either you or User:GoingBatty thought, but it didn't belong in article space. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:55, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Beggbert, you may be interested in a discussion at Talk:Cross-country skiing#Travel vs transport. Cheers, HopsonRoad (talk) 18:23, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

Six years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:33, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]