User talk:Bibekbhurtel5

Archives

This page has archives. Sections older than 1 days may be automatically archived by when more than 4 sections are present.

If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, as I am watching it.
If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, then place {{Talkback|Bibekbhurtel5}} on your talk.
Please click here to leave me a new message.

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Total conquest.jpeg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Total conquest.jpeg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the

copyright tags

may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 18:04, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bibek bhurtel

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read
the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard
to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on

credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable

.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. —C.Fred (talk) 19:57, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Remember: newspaper editors are not automatically
reliable sources—and really, sources other than the paper they work for. —C.Fred (talk) 19:58, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

January 2016

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Total conquest. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 16:24, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Total conquest, you may be blocked from editing. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 16:33, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Help

Note:This is my first account. I am not sarojupreti and please check my info I created this account faster then sarojupreti. As you guys told me to use original account I am using this account.

My saying

@

Nepali keto62 after a month of wikibreak (After beebek62 and Beebekbhurtel were blocked). Please try to understand and help me contribute wikipedia. I will never copy him(sarojupreti) next time. I will start a new account and I will not let him know my wikipedia username too please trust me.Bibek^bhurtel5 07:14, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

So, as I read this, you've admitted that you've abused multiple accounts (five accounts total) and that you created new accounts after two of your other accounts were blocked. In other words, if we accept your statement that you're a different person, then you are also guilty of abuse of multiple accounts.

I'm going to assume good faith that you are a different person and extend the

Nepali keto62

that gets unblocked.

Since the Nepali keto62 account was blocked 20 July, the six-month period mentioned in the standard offer runs from 20 July 2016 until 20 January 2017. —C.Fred (talk) 17:25, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@

Nepali keto62 to be unblocked because of more edit counts there. But what you will do if sarojupreti start creating new accounts as I am not him. I wanna give you one hint sarojupreti always tries to edit Indian TV series and shows related articles because he is fan of it so try to check such articles to track his new account. And if possible remove all my accounts from the category Sockpuppets of sarojupreti and place them in new category like Sockpuppet of Bibekbhurtel5. ThanksBibek^bhurtel5 01:14, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

nbsp;