User talk:Carbon Caryatid
/Archive 1 /Archive 2 /Archive 3 /Archive 4
Redlinks and Nicholas Clayton
I noticed that you removed the redlink [[Nicholas Clayton (Presbyterian)|Nicholas Clayton]] at Warrington Academy. In my view undoing a redlink means that you think that Wikipedia doesn't need an article on the topic. I should explain that in my view Clayton, being worth an article in the Dictionary of National Biography (s:Clayton, Nicholas (DNB00)) is probably worth an article here. If you disgree, we should discuss that. If there was some other reason you removed the redlink, we should go into that. Charles Matthews (talk) 20:32, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
- Hello Charles. I've been doing a little dabbling with the talk) 21:28, 10 January 2010 (UTC)]
- Please do follow WP:REDDEAL - finding redlinks "distracting" puts too much of a premium on the current state, in my view, because redlinks are the growth points; and that is the relevant editorial guideline. I mentioned the Clayton article separately because his prominence is such that reasonable people could disagree on whether he deserves an article. I'm just starting to work in this area, and might create the article once I see more of how he fits in (having placed the material on Wikisource already). I didn't want to confuse that issue with Willoughby of Parham, where I had done the work of adding the link by determining which of those he was. (Nicholas Claytonis someone else, so I had done work to disambiguate that link, also.) We tend to assume aristocrats are worth an article.
- Please do follow
- On a more positive note, I have just created Joseph Towers and discovered that he is of interest to you (Talk:Newington Green Unitarian Church#Dictionary of National Biography). We are just getting going on Wikisource with posting the DNB, intending to do the whole work eventually. It makes sense to me to give some priority to those DNB articles that are of interest to editors here, so I'm noting these mentions when I come across them. Charles Matthews (talk) 09:19, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, I had read talk) 22:07, 11 January 2010 (UTC)]
- Yes, I had read
- Re Coward, he's in the DNB and may well get created: in fact today I was looking at him briefly. This raises a tangential issue, which is that I made him William Coward (merchant) in the DNB Epitome listing page (the one that links to that redlink), i.e. the master page out of the set I'm working from. Much disambiguation has to be going on over there to get the DNB (sub)project moving as far as checking who already has an article (it's around 27,000 names, no joke really). Anyway, nice talking to you, and Wikipedia:WikiProject Missing encyclopedic articles/DNB Epitome gives access to all those lists. Given what I know of your interests, quite a number of the "missing" may be related to them. Charles Matthews (talk) 22:45, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
We need help from editors who speak French...
Can you look into this article. It appears notable but a lot of the info is in Franch...
- Done. talk) 19:55, 15 January 2010 (UTC)]
Random recommendation in passing
Have you read Swindled by Bee Wilson? I think you'd enjoy it. I'm halfway through and thought of you ;) Skittle (talk) 19:47, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
- It's kind of you to think of me...but why? I've heard of the author but not read that novel. talk) 22:59, 17 January 2010 (UTC)]
- It's not a novel, it's a history of food adulteration, with the emphasis so far being on 18th and 19th century Britain. It's very readable, and certain parts connected up with Round About a Pound a Week in my head. For example, the 1850 scandal where "a large number of orphans in Drouitt's Institute for pauper children died, as a result of their oatmeal being padded with barleymeal", and yet the same thing happened again and again: compare with the angry passages in Round about a pound a week, discussing the well-meaning suggestion that poor mothers should feed their children porridge. It's full of discussion and facts about how and why people let adulteration and short-changing get so bad, and it's fascinating. You'll love it. (I've left the project to a large extent, but I thought I'd better log in to leave this message. Mysterious messages from random IPs might give the wrong impression) Skittle (talk) 00:28, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
Unreferenced BLPs
- John Minnion - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 23:22, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
Requests
I have created s:Worthington, Hugh (DNB00), and s:Kentish, John (DNB00) existed already. Watch this space for the others. Charles Matthews (talk) 13:07, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks! I hadn't been in the habit of looking at Wikisource. talk) 07:41, 19 January 2010 (UTC)]
- Another one that will be of interest to you is s:Jennings, David (DNB00), from the Kibworth clan, covering also John Jennings (tutor) who was Anna Barbauld's maternal grandfather (and putting a name, Jane or sometimes Jenny, to her mother). Charles Matthews (talk) 10:33, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
- s:Amory, Thomas (1701-1774) (DNB00). There is actually no separate article for Rochemont Barbauld. Looking around for him on the ODNB site, I did find various pupils at Palgrave Academy. Charles Matthews (talk) 21:42, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
- Another one that will be of interest to you is s:Jennings, David (DNB00), from the Kibworth clan, covering also John Jennings (tutor) who was Anna Barbauld's maternal grandfather (and putting a name, Jane or sometimes Jenny, to her mother). Charles Matthews (talk) 10:33, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
dyk hook question
Could you clarify my issue with your dyk hook here? Thanks, —mattisse (Talk) 22:14, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
accusation of soapboxing
Returned this thread to your talkpage. I think it ends here, see below.
On this refdesk thread about the Chinese sex imbalance, you accused either the OP or the first responder (me) of
- I am happy to clarify my WP:SOAPBOX comment. It was not addressed to you. It followed directly the post by 12thdegree that I considered to be an unnecessary repeated attempt to attract attention to an issue about which they have strong feelings (and continued to rant anyway). Cuddlyable3 (talk) 16:17, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you for your prompt reply. I think "soapbox" is a harsh term in this case. Your state that your reasons are threefold: that the OP had asked a similar question earlier, that they have strong feelings about the issue, and that the question consisted of a rant. Let us take these in order.
- 1. It is permitted to re-ask a question. I think I have even done it myself, perhaps because I felt I had not expressed myself clearly enough in the first question, or because I realised, once having received a partial answer, that one aspect of the question needed to be teased out.
- 2. Strong feelings. When dealing with what might be millions of human deaths, I think strong feelings are understandable. I have strong feelings about the recent Haitian earthquake, and, for that matter, the loss of the Library of Alexandria. It doesn't seem realistic to ask our questioners to be devoid of emotion.
- 3. More to the point, was it a rant? With what language did the OP express this strong emotion? I quote:
- If the number is 21 deaths out of 1000 and should be 16-17 deaths out of 1000 if there were no bias against female infants, then in terms of scale, the tragedy is one of the largest. Why is this not talked about more? Or are there reasons other than bias?
- In other words, "If I have my facts X, Y, and Z correct, there is a large tragedy going on. Why is this not more news-worthy? Or are my facts correct? Am I leaving anything out of the equation?" I read this as intellectual puzzlement, based on what might be a human tragedy. A rant would be something more like:
- There are millions of girls dying in China and nobody is doing anything! Why isn't there an article about it on Wikipedia? I cannot believe that there is such a cover-up of such a serious story! Your silence makes you complicit in GENOCIDE!!!
- That is what I understand as a rant. I might even remove it. But more likely I would give even such intemperate language, which this OP did not use, the benefit of the doubt, and attempt a rational answer, or leave the field clear for others to do so. The guidelines at the top of each reference desk say to volunteers: "Be polite and talk) 17:10, 8 February 2010 (UTC)]
- WP:SOAPBOX is a policy. You may think it a harsh one and you may interpret my mere mentioning it to be an accusation. With respect to your opinion and request I am retracting the comment. Cuddlyable3 (talk) 18:16, 8 February 2010 (UTC)]
- I have no problems with the policy; it was your reference to it in this case that I thought harsh. Thank you for taking my comments into consideration in your decision to remove the comment. However, the absolute redaction makes the following comment (from the OP, as it happens) nonsensical, replying to something that is no longer there. It seems more helpful to the flow of discussion on the refdesk to keep the comment visible but struck through. talk) 19:11, 8 February 2010 (UTC)]
- Harsh or not, we must agree the policy cannot be struck out. I disagree that there is cause to conclude from a guideline as you do that something would be served by reopening my comment. Your ref. desk post containing the word "soapboxing" is intelligible enough as it stands. The OP's expression "I don't care about your opinion" is less than endearing but it also is not nonsensical. Thus I don't see that any relevant discussion flow needs mending. That's all. Cuddlyable3 (talk) 22:01, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
I never suggested that the policy be struck out.My refdesk post ("I don't see your statement above as soapboxing") may be intelligible to regulars and contributors such as ourselves, but it hangs in mid-air for those not used to such discussions, namely for many of the readers and visitors for whom Wikipedia provides the library-like refdesk service. I could continue to analyse this, but as you say the matter ends here, I will raise it on the refdesk talkpage for more general views.talk) 23:09, 8 February 2010 (UTC)]- Raised talk) 08:30, 9 February 2010 (UTC)]
- Raised
- Harsh or not, we must agree the policy cannot be struck out. I disagree that there is cause to conclude from a guideline as you do that something would be served by reopening my comment. Your ref. desk post containing the word "soapboxing" is intelligible enough as it stands. The OP's expression "I don't care about your opinion" is less than endearing but it also is not nonsensical. Thus I don't see that any relevant discussion flow needs mending. That's all. Cuddlyable3 (talk) 22:01, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
- I have no problems with the policy; it was your reference to it in this case that I thought harsh. Thank you for taking my comments into consideration in your decision to remove the comment. However, the absolute redaction makes the following comment (from the OP, as it happens) nonsensical, replying to something that is no longer there. It seems more helpful to the flow of discussion on the refdesk to keep the comment visible but struck through.
Newington Green
Thanks for thinking of me - this is an very interesting topic (my father used to go to the Poet's Road US synagogue in his youth) - someone really needs to produce a history of the Jewish community in this part of London but I am not aware of anything mnuch above the anecdotal level. The English Heritage book 'Jewish heritage in England' alas only deals with buildings still in existence. Btw I was just looking at Paul following Guido Fawkes's attack on him, so made my trivial correction. Looks as if Guido has something particular up his sleeve about this fellow. Best regards, --Smerus (talk) 19:31, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for both. I've followed up the Guido info by adding to talk) 20:15, 14 February 2010 (UTC)]
AfD nomination of Bollocks
An article that you have been involved in editing, Bollocks, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bollocks. Thank you.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Tcp-ip (talk) 20:26, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
Hello!
Hello there,
If you are my type, please talk to me on my talk page and maybe we would get together online or where I live in Edna, Texas. Ericthebrainiac (talk) 14:28, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
Where do you live? Ericthebrainiac (talk) 14:28, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
- ]
Smile!
Hello BrainyBabe, Thesevenseas has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
]
AfD nomination of Lady
An article that you have been involved in editing, Lady, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lady. Thank you.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Kitfoxxe (talk) 01:56, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
A question.
hi. First of all, forget any typing mistake. I have been translating to Spanish Bride kidnapping which , by the way, it´s a very interesting article and a great job (with all the sources and stuff...) and I was wondering if you (as one of the main editors of the article) or someone has consider to promote it to the category of good article or (who knows) a featured article. I appreciate your attention and I apologize again for my bad (written) english. Thanks a lot and I wait for your answer.--Wikiléptico (talk) 00:06, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
- Hola, buenas dias. Your English is much better than my Spanish, and I also am a poor typist, so you have no need to apologise. I am flattered that you consider talk) 09:51, 10 June 2010 (UTC)]
- Thanks I'll follow your advise.Of course in case of any question I will take advantage of your generous offer. Bb.--Wikiléptico (talk) 21:46, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
RE:Thanks for your quick vandal-fighting
Sorry for the slow response. I've added the page to my watchlist. However, please note my login patterns are very irregular and I often won't be there to revert vandalism to it.
Shelley
The Wandering Jew.
The Wandering Jew, A Poem in 4 Cantos by Percy Bysshe Shelley. Published for the Shelley Society by Reeves and Turner, London 1877.
I left a note about this on the Shelley talk page. I see that you've done some editing of the Shelley page, so maybe you can fit this widely unknown poem into the article somewhere. If not, I'll get around to it at some point.-- I Never Cry 01:45, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for the invitation, but, having looked at the page, there isn't realy anything I can add. talk) 11:29, 27 September 2010 (UTC)]
That's cool. I added it to the Major Works section.-- I NEVER CRY 02:57, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
Bravo—you have made an effective contribution here. I perceived the waffle in this and related articles but (as a mere infidel) could not really face sorting it out. I'm almost resolved from now on to stay well clear of articles about theology and
]- Thank you, I appreciate your kind words. Fortunately I have never been addicted to Hong Kong films! talk) 03:06, 11 January 2011 (UTC)]
BBC patrol
Hi BrainyBabe, nice to meet you at the BL yesterday. I've added the idea of the Radio 4 patrol to the WikiProject BBC talk page if you want to chime in on it. It's a funny idea, but it could actually be pretty cool. —Tom Morris 11:34, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
DYK issue
Problem at Template_talk:Did_you_know#Essex_Street_Chapel Johnbod (talk) 00:49, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
- See the DYK rules - the first part of the hook needs a ref (maybe 2) right by the fact. The general refs are ok, but a bit messy - don't you have page numbers? If the ODNB was in refs, you could shorten those ones a lot. There's a bare url. Sort the bare url & the hook refs & I'll pass it. Johnbod (talk) 15:37, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
- All paragraphs now have sourcing. There are no page numbers for the main source book, which dates from 1959 but has been uploaded to the organisation's website, each chapter on a separate page. You say the first part of the hook needs a ref or two. It reads: "... that Essex Hall, where in 1774 Theophilus Lindsey established the first such congregation in England, still serves as the headquarters for the the British Unitarians?" In the first History subsection, I've added an explanatory sentence with ref ("This was the first time in England that a church had formed around explicitly Unitarian beliefs", which summarises the end of chapter 2) to flesh out what I'd thought was clear within the text, but perhaps wasn't explicit enough. That the building still serves as the denomination's HQ is covered at the end of the middle paragraph of the "Essex Hall" section. Also, I've been able to copyedit out the 2nd "the", which I wasn't able to do earlier today. Hope this is up to scratch. talk) 19:48, 19 January 2011 (UTC)]
- All paragraphs now have sourcing. There are no page numbers for the main source book, which dates from 1959 but has been uploaded to the organisation's website, each chapter on a separate page. You say the first part of the hook needs a ref or two. It reads: "... that Essex Hall, where in 1774 Theophilus Lindsey established the first such congregation in England, still serves as the headquarters for the the British Unitarians?" In the first History subsection, I've added an explanatory sentence with ref ("This was the first time in England that a church had formed around explicitly Unitarian beliefs", which summarises the end of chapter 2) to flesh out what I'd thought was clear within the text, but perhaps wasn't explicit enough. That the building still serves as the denomination's HQ is covered at the end of the middle paragraph of the "Essex Hall" section. Also, I've been able to copyedit out the 2nd "the", which I wasn't able to do earlier today. Hope this is up to scratch.
Template help
I am stuck with the formatting of
- The easy answer is to avoid cite templates and ref names & just use "Smith, p.5" with the book in a "references" section. You are not supposed to mix the cite templates & ref names anyway. Johnbod (talk) 13:43, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
- OK. I was trying to get to grips with the cite template, but maybe I'd better avoid it. Thanks anyway, and thanks for your interest in my DYK attempt. talk) 13:49, 19 January 2011 (UTC)]
- OK. I was trying to get to grips with the cite template, but maybe I'd better avoid it. Thanks anyway, and thanks for your interest in my DYK attempt.
DYK for Essex Street Chapel
DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Editathon
Assuming you were there, would you like to write me a short piece about it for the Wikimedia UK newsletter? Charles Matthews (talk) 12:58, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry for the delay. I was thinking, what could I write for you? I had post-flu, and only dragged myself to the BL for the final couple of hours, at which only one curator was present. I had a couple of pleasant conversations, but wasn't really "there". Sorry to be unhelpful this time. talk) 00:22, 27 January 2011 (UTC)]
Barnstar for flawless edits
The Editor's Barnstar | ||
For flawless editing in the Biblical Unitarianism article. In ictu oculi (talk) 03:17, 30 January 2011 (UTC) ]
|
- You are too kind. I went back and found a few more things to tweak! talk) 23:03, 30 January 2011 (UTC)]
Brenda Colvin
Hi BrainyBabe and thanks for starting that page! I'm guessing you too heard the Women's Hour bit today about her biography and started the page.
I'm doing a PhD on a mildly related subject (mentioned on R4) and took to browsing as I was listening. I gathered a load of information but don't have time to synthesize and add it to the page, I am happy to send you the links, and even all the text, if you have the time to do it?? (As someone with a degree in garden history, I was surprised there wasn't already a page for Colvin, but there you go...!) If you do want it, just let me know how to get it to you. (I'll try to remember to check back here for reply!) Cheers! --gobears87 (talk) 13:06, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
- Yes, you are correct that I was listening to talk) 13:29, 3 February 2011 (UTC)]
- Hi, was trying to keep it short. :o) The PhD topic is on my user page - it's reconstruction of blitzed cities in Britain post WWII. I'll go ahead with the links as suggested (talk page), which will also answer where the text is from. BTW one is embedded text but I managed to get it from the source info, so sharing it is easiest by email or some pm method. The amount? So far the text I've collected is 3 pgs at font 12pt... When you say "the Colvin articles", what does that include? (I was wondering if Brenda was related to the architectural historian Sir Howard Colvin, but have not managed to find out.) --gobears87 (talk) 14:14, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
- By "the Colvin articles", I meant those related to Brenda's ilustrious lineage. I've brought them together now at talk) 15:19, 3 February 2011 (UTC)]
- By "the Colvin articles", I meant those related to Brenda's ilustrious lineage. I've brought them together now at
- No one would have seen the Colvin (Brenda or family) on my userpage till I moved the articles from private-ish sandbox to very public mainspace! I'm glad you find the Brenda article of interest. Any improvements you or your colleagues can make would be very welcome. talk) 15:27, 3 February 2011 (UTC)]
- No one would have seen the Colvin (Brenda or family) on my userpage till I moved the articles from private-ish sandbox to very public mainspace! I'm glad you find the Brenda article of interest. Any improvements you or your colleagues can make would be very welcome.
Ping
There are a few open issues on the Lesbian talk page, including the Djuna Barnes book. I lost my place in our discussion. Can you clarify what you'd like to see as an ideal in the literature section? Thanks. Talk:Lesbian#Literature_addition --Moni3 16:40, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
Contradiction
I'm trying to get my head around the contradiction you tagged in Newington Green. I know it's badly worded and doesn't exactly scan well, but is there an actual contradiction? Can you have a look, and leave a note on the talk page for me? Cheers WormTT 14:01, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks, I'll respond on the article talkpage. talk) 16:20, 18 February 2011 (UTC)]
On collaboration
You know, I shouldn't really have to do this, because it's like praising someone for doing the job they're getting paid to do, but I appreciate that we worked together to improve the content of the Lesbian article. Too often I feel like I'm forced to WP:OWN an article because the editors who propose changes refuse to read sources or become familiar with Wiki policies. This worked and I'm grateful for it. Thanks. --Moni3 (talk) 15:47, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
- This is a gracious note, and I appreciate it. I sometimes wonder if I ought to bother trying to work on articles that appear to be owned; this interaction boosts my faith that it is possible, and can be productive. Even people who get paid like praise! And this is the never-ending job we all *aren't* being paid to do. talk) 01:14, 23 February 2011 (UTC)]
Courtesy notice
Hello. In the past, you expressed interest in the topic of Agora and the use of critical SPS over at Talk:Agora_(film)#Critique_of_film. If you are still interested, please join the discussion over at: Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#Agora_and_SPS. Thank you. Viriditas (talk) 10:26, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
- I've tried the links you suggest, but can't find the discussion, sorry. talk) 16:26, 28 February 2011 (UTC)]
Durning-Lawrence
Thanks. Yes, I saw your page on the Lawrence family. I used the sources. Very helpful! Paul B (talk) 16:12, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
Billingshurst Unitarian Chapel and others in Sussex
Hi BrainyBabe, and thanks for your note (and the additions to the article). Sussex has quite a few Unitarian churches, almost all of which are listed buildings and hence definitely notable in the WP sense: I plan to write articles at some point on the ones in Horsham (soon - it's "brewing" in a userpage sandbox), Ditchling and Lewes, and possibly Hastings if I can find enough sources (that one isn't listed). I am quite interested in writing about Sussex Nonconformist places of worship in general: see the redlinks in the template I created for an idea of what I plan to write in the future! I took a photo of Croydon Unitarian Church a couple of weeks ago as well when I had some time to hang around there, but it's not as architecturally interesting as some of the others. Cheers, Hassocks5489 (tickets please!) 12:49, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
- Sounds good! Where is this template of which you speak? You mention sources. There is the Unitarian History Society, and presumably parallel organisations for other denominations. They exist to answer queries such as yours. Good luck! I don't have any particular access to sources, but I might jump in to help with article flow, as I did for Billingshurst (which I kept wanting to call Billingsgate by mistake). talk) 14:28, 11 May 2011 (UTC)]
- That website looks useful as a starting point for sources – thanks. Copyediting/prose checking is always gladly welcomed; I tend to write quite spontaneously, focusing on a few sentences at a time, and a natural flow is not always easy to maintain. The template is here: Template:Sussex Nonconformism (and is used on the bottom of the appropriate articles). Hassocks5489 (tickets please!) 20:56, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for your interest in Robert Tyrwhitt. I have just started a related article on the SPKS; which is not a major institution, but comes up at a certain point on the timeline. As with Theological Repository which I was looking at last week, identifying contributors and then giving them articles where possible (e.g. from the DNB) is a decent way to get some of the historical background. The reference I'm using from Thomas Belsham has given me enough of a start to get an article together; but I certainly wasn't able to identify all of the members of the Society he mentions. Any input you have on this issue would be welcome. Charles Matthews (talk) 10:08, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for this. I'm not sure I have any particular input. It is so easy to get tangled in the names! Is SPKS part of, or connected to, The Unitarian Society for promoting Christian Knowledge and the Practice of Virtue by the Distribution of Books? (See talk) 08:39, 18 May 2011 (UTC)]
hey 'babe
I'm the guy whose ancestry you corrected on the wikipedia reference desk :) I agree with your correction, in the paragraph I used the word in error, not once, but twice, and after having otherwise edited the paragraph and reread it a couple of times. do you want to know a dirty little secret? you're the only person to ever have anything to point out to me in my diction (i.e. something real and genuine), which I take away and make my own. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.156.225.56 (talk) 21:24, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
- Hello OP. It is a common error, and I can well believe that it might be overlooked in proof-reading. Thank you for saying my correction has given you something to take away. Maybe you can pass on the favour one day! talk) 08:34, 27 May 2011 (UTC)]
Mary Wollstonecraft family tree
I fixed the Mary Wollstonecraft family tree. Thanks for bringing this to my attention. It appears that some of the information in the Claire Clairmont article may be incorrect, however, especially regarding Charles Gaulis. https://sites.google.com/site/maryjanesdaughter/home/mary-jane-s-daughter has a detailed explanation. Apparently Charles Gaulis was actually Charles Clairmont's father, but not Claire Clairmont's. Kaldari (talk) 06:14, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you for your prompt attention. I have added somewhat to that article. I wonder if Tory peer talk) 08:12, 15 June 2011 (UTC)]
Margaret King
DYK for Margaret King
nominate ) 18:04, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Lille Graah
DYK for Elizabeth Robins Pennell
Calmer Waters 16:03, 8 August 2011 (UTC) List of American gentlemen's clubs naming controversyHey there. You started the article List of American gentlemen's clubs four years ago, and since then it's grown into a great list article. Now, though nobody's objected before, some people are trying to change its title to "List of North American private social clubs." There's an ongoing discussion on that article's talk page. I thought you might want to put in your two cents. Clubwiki (talk) 16:27, 11 September 2011 (UTC) ]
Hi! Just to let you know, I have started an article on Ditchling Unitarian Chapel, which (judging by the amount of source material I've amassed) could turn out to be a biggie. I can't do much on it for the next 24 hours, but any comments/tweaks will be gratefully received during its development. Hassocks5489 (tickets please!) 12:24, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
Barnstar
Best wishes. Axl ¤ [Talk] 22:57, 5 October 2011 (UTC) SigningIs there a reason why you are not? I don't know what has happened to the Ref Desks' Sign Bot. 00:32, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
Rhys MorganI have opened a review of the deletion decision as a matter of urgency doktorb wordsdeeds 01:10, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
Just spotted your query about DRV on a talk page whilst following this up. It's an acronym for Deletion Review (new one on me). The DRV in question is this one. -Rushyo Talk 19:36, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
Italian and Spanish educationHi, I was primarily speaking from anecdotal experience, but the phenomenon is well documented in academia. For one set of illustrative statistics for Australia as an example, see page 49 of this paper. As you can see, the difference between Italian and Spanish is by a factor of 10 or more throughout secondary school. My anecdotal experience, is that I have not even heard of Spanish being offered as a choice in a secondary school in Australia - the most common options are Japanese and French, with less common offerings being Italian, German and (increasingly) Chinese. As I understand it, the popularity of Spanish in the United States can be largely attributed to its proximity to the large Spanish-speaking population of Latin America, and consequently the large number of Spanish-speaking people in the United States. I'm not sure what the situation is in the United Kingdom. However, in the Antipodes at least, Italian predominates (over Spanish) by a large margin as a foreign language in education - some explanations might be the large (or larger?) numbers of Italian migrants compared to Spanish, the cultural prominence of Italian in various fields (opera is one example that springs to mind), and perhaps some connection to the traditional place of Latin in school curriculums. I am not an expert in this area, so please let me know if you have a contrary viewpoint. --PalaceGuard008 (Talk) 22:35, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your message. Black people is watched by more than 500 editors (including me). I try to clean out vandalism when I notice it. I know there are some long-running battles in the article about Afrocentrism, ancient Egypt, and Black people who are not of African descent, and I try to stay away from the controversy. If you have concerns, I think you should go ahead and make the changes you'd like and wait to see if anybody reverts them. It's just the cat-and-mouse game of ]
TriviaJust FYI, we don't reference "In popular culture" items to talk) 23:48, 20 December 2011 (UTC) ]
BechdelYes, the Bechdel test was what I was thinking of. Thank you! Dismas|(talk) 03:13, 1 January 2012 (UTC) "Crown colonies"Off the back of our mutual edits to West Indies Federation, I feel the term "Crown colony" is best avoided, as it's notoriously ambiguous. Roughly speaking, the term is generally used in everyday speech to mean "British colony", but it's also used in a more technical sense to mean a colony lacking any form of self-government. While the colonies/territories that made up the West Indies Federation were of the former type, they weren't all of the latter. Also, using a plain "colony" saves a word! Regards, Andrew Gwilliam (talk) 18:54, 4 January 2012 (UTC).
Appreciation from editor of Costa Concordia DisasterPlease continue to visit Costa Concordia Disaster. I seem to be the lead editor (so far) of the Shipwreck section. Although I am expert in coastal navigation, nautical charts, and maritime law, I certain appreciate those, like you, who assist techies such as I to, together, make an article shine. I appreciate that your skills are in high demand but do visit us "every now and then" to either work or comment.SteveO1951 (talk) 03:58, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for spending your time writing to me about the Concordia disaster translation. I'm truly sorry about my mistake. It's clear I didn't want to tamper anything, I was just trying to fix something that looked terribly wrong. Keep in mind that the only word that i fixed at that time was "dickhead", Which I strongly believe is just plain wrong. Italian is my native language, but I don't keep a blog neither I'm an editor for a magazine, so trying to argue again could be viewed as personal research. Anyway I'm fine with the actual translation. Nevermind. :) --Pascalbrax (talk) 22:15, 23 January 2012 (UTC) TalkbackHello, Carbon Caryatid. You have new messages at RadioFan's talk page.
Message added 21:23, 22 January 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. RadioFan (talk) 21:23, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
A tip about British History OnlineHi there. I redid this diff about University Hall. The main point is that British History Online pages now generate WP citations: for example on this one if you go to "show another format" top left, the dropdown menu gives a Wikipedia option. And then if you click on ">" it brings up {{cite web}} filled in, so very quick and easy. I also piped the link for University Hall to Dr Williams's Library, since that hall should probably have its history on that page, at least initially. Internal links are preferred, as a matter of style. Probably somewhere in the Manual. Charles Matthews (talk) 08:07, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
feminist science fictionHey -- you changed a term on the feminist science fiction article in the text:
"technologically" replaced "terminologically". I realize "terminologically" is rather awkward, but it seems significantly different too me. The story was about a reversal of purdah, IIRC, and so I suspect "terminologically" was meant to refer to language. I don't recall whether the story actually was technologically futuristic. So, I'm just checking in with you to make sure you're correcting based on knowledge and not a presumption of a typo. thoughts? --Lquilter (talk) 00:57, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
References
Who said it?Hello, this may be asking a lot but since I have tagged one of your contributions with a "citation needed" I wonder if you can recall where you got this quote which you placed in The Dinner Party:
You added in in this context, which may help you recall: I started to hunt for it, but as I remarked in my Edit Summary:
Thanks, —Blanchette (talk) 06:08, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
Good work on Halliburton (EOM)TCO (talk) 17:40, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
Since you are the leading registered editor in terms of edits at WP:FOUR) 17:53, 25 June 2013 (UTC) ]
Your submission at |
nominate ) 06:34, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
WikiSourceJust a note - fixed the sourcing for you on Anna Letitia Le Baron. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 19:47, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
UnitarianismHi there, I have consolidated some pages you have edited to add in the British Unitarian and Free Christians Association. Rather than start an edit war, I thought we could civilly discuss the matter here. I think your effort to highlight this organisation is a good one, as it is not properly linked to in the UU pages, which tend to take a very American focus. However, I think that excessively complicated disambiguation pages, we should make an effort to highlight the British (and other countries) associations where the religion is called "Unitarianism" rather than "Unitarian Universalism". My suggestion would be that we do it under the Associations sub-heading on the Unitarian Universalism main page. I also think we need to have better links for those searching for Unitarianism. Hence my support for the page move issue on the Unitarianism page, which takes you to the (largely historical) Christian theology. If you could support the move it would be great, as then we can highlight the Unitarian Universalism page as the first or second link when people in Britain search for Unitarianism. The Enlightened (talk) 22:38, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
Teahouse talkbackHello BrainyBabe. I have answered a question you asked at the Teahouse. If you have any further questions, just ask on my talk page.-- DR/N 02:21, 5 August 2013 (UTC) ]
barnstar
DYK for Hypatia Bradlaugh Bonner
Alex ShihTalk 00:03, 28 August 2013 (UTC) Ministers/Denomination mentionsThanks for your edits of my recent articles. I want to clarify that, while your edits do, in fact, make sense to me, in many cases, categories seem to exist BOTH for ministry and denominational identification. For example, Billy Graham is both in the "Southern Baptist ministers" and "Southern Baptists" categories (as well as "Baptists from the United States"!) And John Bunyan is both in "English Baptists" and "English Christian ministers." Henry Allon is both in the "English Congregationalists" and "English Congregationalist clergy" categories. I hope this is a new policy you're enforcing, but if it is not, then both seem totally appropriate, if (admittedly) a bit redundant. I'll use your style in future articles, but I hope this policy is being enforced across all denominations in perhaps you can edit out these other categories if they seem to also be redundant. Thanks. Nhprman 15:59, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
ODNB missing womenTo let you know what has happened about this. The entire ODNB online index has been loaded into a tool by User:Magnus Manske. This is actually a fresh start, rather than building on the work already done on the older DNB. The point of the tool is to match ODNB entries to Wikidata entries. That is not going to get done fully for a while - tens of thousands to add - but work on the women could go on as a subproject. Once the ODNB-to-wikidata matching has been set up, automation can then easily produce lists of non-missing women, I believe. There would need to be a separate effort to tag the ODNB women. A fair amount to do here, therefore. It is a promising approach in the longer term, though (thinking about other languages, for example). The tool is at http://tools.wmflabs.org/mix-n-match/, and requires a TUSC login. Charles Matthews (talk) 12:39, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
Same academy?Brainy Babe, cc Charles (does ping work from Talk pages?)
I started this second stub but am concerned that it may be the case that the two never existed separately (at the same time) and a redirect might be better. Can you confirm whether this is the same academy or not? In ictu oculi (talk) 11:41, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
Just made a bunch of workYou really messed up a bunch of articles by removing categories about people who bred Arabian horses and recategorizing them as "racehorse breeders". Although Arabians can be raced, this is not what they are primarily known for, they are not Thoroughbreds, they are a different horse breed (an ancestor of the Thoroughbred, yes, but also a modern breed still with us today) and lumping these breeders in with race horse breeders, which are primarily people who breed Thoroughbreds, is of no help to no one, confuses people, and is not accurate. I had to revert all your changes. You probably meant well, but please don't "refine" categories when you don't know what you are doing. Montanabw(talk) 05:54, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
Will take it there. I get really, really tired of people who don't know anything about horses just changing stuff without checking in. Montanabw(talk) 22:00, 13 December 2013 (UTC) Your submission at AfC |
Editathon Invitation Celebrating Charlie Chaplin's film The Tramp at London's Cinema Museum, Kennington This is a free event, one of a series of editathons which Wikimedia UK organises in conjunction with a variety of host organisations.. When? Saturday, 7 March 2014, 11am-4pm Where? 2 Dugard Way (off Renfrew Road) London SE11 4TH. Point of contact: Fabian Tompsett (fabian.tompsettwikimedia.org.uk) for Wikimedia UK. Further details and Registration: Education Program:Wikimedia UK/Cinema Museum 2015 (Spring 2015) |
Meetup Invitation Hi Carbon Caryatid, You are cordially invited to an opportunity to meet active Wikimedians in and around London face-to-face. Description: Informal afternoon in a pub, children welcome. When? Sunday, 8th March from 1 pm. Where? Penderel's Oak, 283-288 High Holborn, London, WC1V 7HP.
Further details and check in: London 91 Hope to see you there, Fabian Tompsett (WMUK) (talk) 11:07, 5 March 2015 (UTC) |
Help with an article
Hi I noticed you have made some good edits to our local chapel wikipedia article back in 2011, Rivington_Unitarian_Chapel hence I am messaging you to request a small bit of help. There appears to have appeared a red cite error on the page and I am not sure how to correct it. It appears to be caused by someone else's edits not yours, but I hope you don't kind having a look, sincere regards --Pennine rambler (talk) 23:02, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
- Hello, I've finally had a look. The error message is now gone. I've corrected a few other things as well. Carbon Caryatid (talk) 20:27, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Reference errors on 31 December
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the )
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a
account creation
Hello Carbon Caryatid,
We are cleaning up some unused account creator
flags. This flag is for people that need to create lots of accounts for other people on Wikipedia, normally part of the
You show as inactive for this flag (0
actions in the last year), and it has been removed. If I have overlooked some other pressing need for this flag, please reply on my talk page. Please note, this will have no impact on your ability to edit anything, or create up to 5 new accounts per day for other people. Thank you and happy editing! — xaosflux Talk 22:40, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can
Richard Nevell (WMUK) (talk) 15:18, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
at any time by removing the {{Thule is cool!
Thanks. The atlas has only been up since yesterday. The only reason I saw it was because it came through on my Facebook feed, https://www.facebook.com/KitikmeotHeritage/?fref=nf. I'll take a look and see what I can find on the Fifth Thule Expedition. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 14:16, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
PECCAVI and Manchester Guardian
I don't have access to the Manchester Guardian archives for 1936, but I can offer you a pdf of:
- "PECCAVI". The Living Age. 350 (4436): 236. May 1936.
The article is attributed to the Manchester Guardian and reports that Lord Zetland's investigations led him to believe Napier never sent such a message, and that the story originated with a paragraph in Punch in 1845. That confirms some parts of the Catherine Winkworth article. If you would like a copy, please use Special:EmailUser to email me so that I can reply with the pdf as an attachment. Regards, Worldbruce (talk) 04:10, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
I am not
a big fan of statements such as your "over the last decade" added to Richard Halliburton because, well what will it mean 20 years from now? Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 22:06, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
"Organize", "organise"
Both spellings are accepted British usage. No harm done if you change one to the other, except that a few other people will check what you've done and you've wasted their time. See Oxford spelling for details. Bmcln1 (talk) 15:06, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
- Bother. Oxford comma and Oxford marmelade are more to my taste. Thanks for pointing that out. I'll leave it as is, and see what happens.Carbon Caryatid (talk) 19:05, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
2016 Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Community Survey
The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.
- Survey, (hosted by Qualtrics)
Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:49, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
Have you seen this article on waste collector?
We were talking about an article like this:
- No, I didn't; thanks for alerting me. I've done a little tidying. How best should the occupations be linked? Or maybe a parallel article of "toilet waste" collectors, across cultures and times?
- Good - I'll put my reply on the talk page of that article. talk) 03:16, 23 June 2016 (UTC)]
- Good - I'll put my reply on the talk page of that article.
Moved to Talk:Fanny. Carbon Caryatid (talk) 22:10, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
The Herveys
Just a quick heads up, I have just put John Hervey, 7th Marquess of Bristol up for GAN having added on some of your extended groundwork a few years back. If that goes well, I might see if I can beef up some of the other family members, several of which seem to have quite an illustrious past. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:20, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
- PS - sorry about having to revert, I would like to find a source that shows the 7th Marquess coming out was important as, say, Graham Chapman's, but there doesn't appear to be much other than that's just who he was. If I can get hold of some of the other paper sources, hopefully something will fall out of that. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:03, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
- OK thanks for explaining. Carbon Caryatid (talk) 02:22, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
Legacies of British Slave-ownership
Hi,
I misremembered the state of things when we talked about the LBS project; we already have Legacies of British Slave-ownership person ID (P3023) in Wikidata. 298 Wikidata items currently have a value for that property. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:04, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks! I'm so pleased. I first mooted the idea to Wiki-friends in March but couldn't take it on myself. I'll ponder how best to develop the use of this data. Thanks for your support. Carbon Caryatid (talk) 18:25, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Do you have any information on him and are you going to write the article? Please let me know what sources you have as I have been looking for quite some time but can only find a reference to his daughter Jean's marriage, so I don't know what practical use a redlink will be. ww2censor (talk) 21:08, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
- Hi! No, I don't have any info, but I'm in full accord with the spirit of Wikipedia:Red link, especially:
- a red link should be allowed to remain in an article if it links to a term that could plausibly sustain an article, but for which there is no existing candidate article [...] Do not remove red links unless you are certain that Wikipedia should not have an article on the subject [...] Good red links help Wikipedia—they encourage new contributors in useful directions, and remind us that Wikipedia is far from finished.
- A more useful question is, where exactly should the request for an article go? I'm not averse to proposing the creation of an amalgamation, e.g. one good paragraph for each Postmaster General. Carbon Caryatid (talk) 22:47, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
Reference errors on 8 November
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the )
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a
DYK for John Hervey, 7th Marquess of Bristol
On 17 November 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article John Hervey, 7th Marquess of Bristol, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/John Hervey, 7th Marquess of Bristol. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, John Hervey, 7th Marquess of Bristol), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Materialscientist (talk) 00:51, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
Richard Smith
I believe you have the wrong Richard Smith, as father-in-law for
To cut to the chase, I think the father-in-law is the Richard Smith on this LBS page for "Richard Smith of Islington": I see you were talking to Andy Mabbett about the LBS project above. Per the ODNB biography for Charlotte, we are looking for "a West India merchant and a director of the East India Company".
Richard Smith (East India Company officer) was on the military rather than the commercial side; and he died 1803. The reason I believe I have the right one is not just circumstantial: this citation for Lionel Smith's grandfather says he died in 1776.
Looking on the bright side, it looks like that more info is available for the Richard Smith of Islington LBS page. It has a "long identifier" 2146650053, which means a person included for deeper background, rather than one of those directly claiming compensation.
Charles Matthews (talk) 21:08, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks for picking this up. I'll rectify Charlotte Turner Smith or shall I? Carbon Caryatid (talk) 11:12, 18 November 2016 (UTC)]
I'm happy to work on this area. I'll go to the library today for the volume of Charlotte's Letters, which has a genealogical table. There is plenty more on LBS, too, as I discovered later. Maybe I can get a draft together for Richard Smith of Islington. Charles Matthews (talk) 11:53, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
- Great. I agree that the Islington family would make an interesting article. The LBS is a rich source; are you focussing on it? Carbon Caryatid (talk) 12:13, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
I have the book and family tree now: amusingly to me, looks like Richard Smith of Islington is an ancestor of Peter Swinnerton-Dyer, one of my Ph.D. examiners. Quite irrelevant, though.
I have been worrying first about the discrepancy between the Venn database (ACAD) and what LBS has. This is about Richard III Smith, Rev. Richard Smith on LBS, Benjamin's nephew we assume, where Venn says his father was Thomas Smith. Nothing can be taken for granted.
Here is that text (SMT784R2):
"Smith, Richard. Adm. sizar (age 17) at TRINITY, Oct. 25, 1784. S. of Thomas, of London. School, St Paul's. Matric. Michs. 1785; Scholar, 1788; B.A. (11th Wrangler) 1789; M.A. 1792. Fellow, 1791-1804; Junior Dean, 1798 and 1800-1. Ord. deacon (Peterb.) Dec. 20, 1789. R. of Sutton, Sussex, 1806-48, and R. of Bignor, 1826-48. Died Oct. 23, 1848, aged 82. (St Paul's Sch. Reg.; Northants. Clergy; G. Mag., 1848, II. 663.)"
We can note that Bignor Park was a Turner family property.
So this page from the
Something that can be read, just about, at s:Page:Alumni Oxoniensis (1715-1886) volume 4.djvu/94 is the Richard Smith who matriculates at St Alban Hall, Oxford in 1793. Who is son of Richard (Smith) of Westminster. He then takes Oxford degrees in 1808? I think this is the same person, going to Oxford first. By the way the letters book has two things to add: date of birth 2 November 1766, which is fine; and wife a daughter of Richard Acklom of Nottinghamshire. Up to a typo somewhere, that I think is the maternal grandfather of Robert Acklom Ingram.
To sum up, there are the LBS page(s), the ODNB, ACAD, CCEd, Alumni Oxoniensis, and The Collected Letters of Charlotte Smith, and they all, quite fortunately, give different angles and leads.
Richard II Smith, father of Richard III and elder brother of Benjamin, Rev. Richard Smith the elder on LBS, is in CCEd as this page only, but the Letters has dates his dates 1 September 1739 to 15 February 1772, and wife Elizabeth Mary Mapp of Barbados. It looks like he is the Richard Smith three places higher in the Alumni Oxoniensis list at Queen's College, Oxford, as LBS suggests; but the Wikisource scan is bad.
So, tracking down Richard I is going to be harder, but there is actually plenty of context. Charles Matthews (talk) 16:13, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
- It sounds like a good day's work. I don't know half the sources you refer to, nor which Benjamin you mean (the only one I know is the Whig MP). So I'm in no position to offer helpful comment, I'm afraid, but I can and will cheer you on from the sidelines. Carbon Caryatid (talk) 16:29, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
Well, I've begun a draft at
- Good show. I notice you've created the draft not in your sandbox - does that mean it would be ok for me to make amendments? I don't want to step on your toes. Carbon Caryatid (talk) 17:38, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
Of course. By the way, the discussion above wasn't meant to be baffling. I suppose it is a worked example of the kind of approach promoted by Wikidata, where I work a lot these days: look for people in name-brand databases, worry away at identification issues. Charles Matthews (talk) 05:44, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Carbon Caryatid. Voting in the
The
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
December 2016 at Women in Red
| |
---|---|
Two new topics for our online editathons |
(To subscribe: ]
Thank you
Thank you for your copy editing help at Fake news website. Sagecandor (talk) 15:51, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you. Articles like that need all the help and clarity we can muster. Carbon Caryatid (talk) 16:00, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
An award for your contributions
These virtual BBC 100 Women freebies are for you. Thank you for your contributions to our very successful BBC 100 Women editathon | |
---|---|
WiR/WMUK/BBC 100 Women worldwide online edit-a-thon
|
--
(See you at our next event Women in Philosophy online edit-a-thon) Victuallers (talk) 13:55, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Seasons Greetings
Merry Christmas from me! Thanks for your company during 2016. We have seen the percentage of articles on women rise from 15% to 16.77%. 20% is within our grasp and that's an increase of a third over what we first found. Victuallers (talk) 13:55, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
January 2017 at Women in Red
| |
---|---|
Women Philosophers & Women in Education online editathons |
(To subscribe, ]
Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future.[survey 1] The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey.[survey 2] The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.
You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to [email protected].
Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 19:25, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
- ^ This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
- ^ Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.
Thanks for you help today
Great to meet you too!
February 2017 at Women in Red
| |
---|---|
Black Women & Women Anthropologists online editathons |
(To subscribe, ]
Greetings
Hi, long time no speak, hope all is well. Care to join us all this Sunday? meta:Meetup/London/115. ϢereSpielChequers 19:03, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
- Hi, I had hoped to come; in fact I set off, but had to turn back. I hope you have a good gathering. Best wishes to everyone! Carbon Caryatid (talk) 14:59, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
March 2017 at Women in Red
Welcome to... Women's History Month worldwide online editathon Facilitated by Women in Red | ||
(To subscribe: ] |
Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey
Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.
If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.
About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or [email protected]. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 08:25, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
April events at Women in Red
Welcome to Women in Red's | ||
|
(To subscribe: ]
May 2017 at Women in Red
Welcome to Women in Red's | ||
|
(To subscribe: ]
Re "Lord Paul" - is Elizabeth B Allan at it again?!
Hello! I stumbled across your wonderfully arch words of wisdom to Elizabeth B Allan (Lord Paul's secretary?) re her flattering editing of Lord Paul's article in 2011. I liked your work so much I did a little sleuthing and discovered that a "Beth Allan" has also been doing (favourable?) edits of the Lord Paul article in Dec./2013 and Feb./2016. All 24 edits "Beth Allan" has done have been exclusively on Lord Paul's article and all (bar the first) have been dubiously marked as minor, including one which resulted in a loss if 1,516 characters. I don't know if all this work has been noticed or if it has biased the article, but I thought I should pass on what I found given your previous interest. Keep up your wonderful work!115.64.164.51 (talk) 00:41, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
- Flattery will get *you* everywhere, o mysterious anon. Lord Paul is on my list of things to do - articles in which I once took an interest, and which, I am sadly aware, have slipped when I took my eye off them. It is a long list, and one I mostly ignore. But your message will bump it up. And your angle on this is? Carbon Caryatid (talk) 20:26, 13 May 2017 (UTC)]
- I don't really have any angles, I'm just doing too much Wiki browsing along with occasional compulsions to do clean-up edits and add a few comments. I can't remember the details of how I came across your wonderful work, but I've been following the edit patterns of lots of people in lots of articles and "BrainyBabe" was one of many leads I followed down the rabbit hole, which lead me to you beautiful advice to Ms. Allan, which prompted a read of Lord Paul's article and a glance at the edit pattern there, only to discover her return to dubious editing under a barely altered moniker. Meanwhile, I should be out buying a Mothers' Day gift/flowers, so I'll have to tear myself away from this keyboard and do my duty. Have a superb day. Cheers!110.22.7.108 (talk) 02:51, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
June 2017 offerings @ WikiProject Women in Red
Welcome to Women in Red's June 2017 worldwide online editathons. | ||
(To subscribe: ]
July 2017 at Women in Red
Welcome to Women in Red's July 2017 worldwide online editathons. | ||
|
(To subscribe: ]
OrphanReferenceFixer: Help on reversion
Hi there! I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. Recently, you reverted my fix to Whiteface (performance).
If you did this because the references should be removed from the article, you have misunderstood the situation. Most likely, the article originally contained both <ref name="foo">...</ref>
and one or more <ref name="foo"/>
referring to it. Someone then removed the <ref name="foo">...</ref>
but left the <ref name="foo"/>
, which results in a big red error in the article. I replaced one of the remaining <ref name="foo"/>
with a copy of the <ref name="foo">...</ref>
; I did not re-insert the reference to where it was deleted, I just replaced one of the remaining instances. What you need to do to fix it is to make sure you remove all instances of the named reference so as to not leave any big red error.
If you reverted because I made an actual mistake, please be sure to also correct any reference errors in the page so I won't come back and make the same mistake again. Also, please post an error report at User talk:AnomieBOT so my operator can fix me! If the error is so urgent that I need to be stopped, also post a message at User:AnomieBOT/shutoff/OrphanReferenceFixer. Thanks! AnomieBOT⚡ 23:42, 13 July 2017 (UTC) If you do not wish to receive this message in the future, add {{bots|optout=AnomieBOT-OrphanReferenceFixer}}
to your talk page.
Women in Red's new initiative: 1day1woman
Women in Red is pleased to introduce... A new initiative for worldwide online coverage: 1day1woman | ||
(To subscribe: ] |
August 2017 at Women in Red
Welcome to Women in Red's August 2017 worldwide online editathons. | ||
|
(To subscribe:
A new WiR initiative starting in August
Introducing... WiR's new initaitve: 1day1woman for worldwide online coverage Facilitated by Women in Red | ||
(To subscribe: |
September 2017 at Women in Red
Welcome to Women in Red's September 2017 worldwide online editathons. | ||
|
(To subscribe:
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 21:19, 28 August 2017 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red October editathon invitation
Welcome to Women in Red's October 2017 worldwide online editathons.
| ||
(To subscribe: |
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:54, 25 September 2017 (UTC) via MassMessaging
November editathons from Women in Red: Join us!
Welcome to Women in Red's November 2017 worldwide online editathons.
| ||
(To subscribe: |
-Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:19, 21 October 2017 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Blackface in Contemporary Art
Hi, I'm not sure about moving the citation of Bruce Nauman's Art Make-up and Flesh to White to Black to Flesh videos to the Physical section. I can see why, but imho these artworks are more conceptual, i.e. more "about" the idea (and history) of blackface than being actual, derogatory blackface. I don't have a citation to that effect, at least not yet, it's only my judgement. But of course since it involves actual makeup I can also see how, objectively, it is actual, physical blackface. Cheers Donellew (talk) 04:30, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks Donellew for initiating this discussion. I'll copy your comment to create Talk:Blackface in contemporary art and respond there. Carbon Caryatid (talk) 16:59, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Thanks
I just wrote a short article about Edith Cliff. I thought she was worth a shot. Esemgee (talk) 18:18, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
- Well done! I've asked for general advice here. Carbon Caryatid (talk) 18:46, 23 November 2017 (UTC)]
WiR December highlights
Welcome to Women in Red's December 2017 worldwide online editathons.
| ||
(To subscribe: |
--Ipigott (talk) 11:12, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
dear Authorized,
I already speak English and Turkish. I translated Turkish sources and biographies into English myself
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Carbon Caryatid. Voting in the
The
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Yo Ho Ho
ϢereSpielChequers is wishing you Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's Solstice or Christmas, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hanukkah, Lenaia, Festivus or even the Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!
Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{}}~~~~ to your friends' talk pages.
ϢereSpielChequers 22:04, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
New Year's resolution: Write more articles for Women in Red!
Welcome to Women in Red's January 2018 worldwide online editathons.
| ||
(To subscribe: |
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:13, 27 December 2017 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Feburary 2018 at Women in Red
Welcome to Women in Red's February 2018 worldwide online editathons.
New:
| ||
(To subscribe: ] |
Far Distant O
Sorry, I didn't notice you were in the midst of working on this. I could have waited. Cheers, Brian Bmcln1 (talk) 11:04, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
A Dobos torte for you!
7&6=thirteen (☎) has given you a Dobos torte to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it.
To give a Dobos torte and spread the WikiLove, just place {{subst:Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. |
7&6=thirteen (☎) 15:41, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Back-to-back houses article
Hi, I see you're making extensive changes to the Back-to-back houses article, which can only be a good thing. Can you be mindful that, as I have posted it as a GA candidate, then some of the new paragraphs you're making will need to be cited (or citations moved/additionally added to the new paragraphs), so as to ensure it isn't an issue during a subsequent review. I must admit that whilst I hadn't taken any interest before in these house types, there is a wealth of information on them, and no doubt the article could be increased by a further 50% by further scrutiny of the refs I have used. Bungle (talk • contribs) 14:57, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks. I've taken an interest in the article for a year or so. I was pleased to see it listed as a GA candidate, hoping that this would attract more attention to tody it up. Bits of it were still quite baggy, e.g. four-clause sentences. The more eyes and fingers the merrier. Carbon Caryatid (talk) 15:12, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
February 2018
- Dear Anchorvale Rather than get into a lather as to what Ms George is mainly known for and whether she would merit an article just for her horse breeding activity, can I suggest we sort this out at Category talk:Arabian and part-Arabian horses? ϢereSpielChequers 17:37, 14 February 2018 (UTC)]
Women's History Month 2018 at Women in Red
Welcome to Women in Red's March 2018 worldwide online editathons.
| ||
(To subscribe: ] |
Removing large ch\unks of information from Kayayei article
Thanks for your edits on Kayayei article. I saw that you removed large chunks of information from the article. But instead of undoing your work I want to reach out to ask "why".
Regards.
-Masssly (talk) 00:24, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks for reaching out. I made several edits, with brief edit summaries, taking the article from 4,526 to 4,307 characters. I don't believe I did remove "large chunks of information", although I did trim repetitive or emotive wording. I added a category, and the article's first image; I retitled the sections. If there is any information that I removed and you wish to reinstate, perhaps the best place to discuss that would be on the article talkpage. Carbon Caryatid (talk) 00:50, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
A toast sandwich for you!
Hello Misterperson (talk) 21:30, 8 March 2018 (UTC) |
A toast sandwich for you!
Please let me keep this up. Theperson111 (talk) 14:33, 9 March 2018 (UTC) |
Remittance man thanks
Thanks for you work there and elsewhere.
Zezen (talk) 06:38, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
- You are most welcome! Carbon Caryatid (talk) 10:02, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
April 2018 at Women in Red
Welcome to Women in Red's April 2018 worldwide online editathons.
| ||
To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list or
|
Nicola Horlick
A year or so ago you assisted a newcomer editor, Nhorlick (talk · contribs), with some issues about references to the Bernie Madoff scandal in an article about the editor after seeking advice at BLPN. In January of this year an IP editor readded and supplemented (though it would appear that the supplement may not have anything to do with the scandal) that information including the blog-supported material which you removed even before the main removal. Nhorlick reappeared, tried to get it reverted, and managed to get herself blocked for legal threats (which is not unusual with editors in this situation who don't know our policies). If the material should not have been included previously — I'm not saying that it should or shouldn't have, but if — then it probably ought not to be included now. I'm only involved in this because I'm the chairperson of the Mediation Committee and before getting herself blocked she filed, inappropriately but in good faith, a request for mediation. I thought you might want to know that the issue has come back up in case you might want to give her a hand again. I'm not saying that you should or should not, nor am I taking any position pro or con on whether the information ought to be there or not, I'm just giving you a heads up. Finally, this is not in any way an official communication of, or on behalf of, the Mediation Committee. Regards, TransporterMan (TALK) 22:21, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you for the heads-up. I have tackled the issue, and described my actions on the article talkpage. Carbon Caryatid (talk) 14:24, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
Thank You
Hi Carbon, Thank you for such a warm welcome. I believe that you will be a helping hand among all other editors
Whaling categories
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
I can't quite get my head around the categories.
1.I created Category:Whaling weapons in error, and would like it deleted; I have created the correct Category:Whaling implements instead.
2. I see that the article Whaling in the United Kingdom still sits within Category:Whaling by country, which is no longer correct, because it now sits, as it should, within Category:Whaling in the United Kingdom. How can I make it appear in only the former category? Carbon Caryatid (talk) 22:12, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
- Done.
- Change [[Category:Whaling by country]] into [[Category:Whaling in the United Kingdom]]. Another option is HotCat, which semi-automates the process.
- If you want more help, change the {{]
Expose the Waster...
...eh? This one went right over my head. Pyrope 22:32, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
- Yes me too! That was an innocent typo, but quite funny I think. I meant "Expose Easter egg", i.e. make visible her full current name. Carbon Caryatid (talk) 23:11, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
- Ah! Right, I see where you were coming from. However, that isn't an Easter egg link and therefore there is nothing to expose. The link is explicitly made to one of the authors of that book, and the link takes you to the page for that author. Nothing hidden. No surprises. The fact that she has more recently added to her surname doesn't really justify that rather clumsy piece of extraneous verbiage. We're not exactly in a Johnny Rotten = John Lydon situation here! Pyrope 15:12, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
May 2018 at Women in Red
Welcome to Women in Red's May 2018 worldwide online editathons.
| ||
(To subscribe: ] |
I'm stuck on a copyvio
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
This is a new one for me, in more than a decade editing. A week ago I created Drift whale, and within 15-20 minutes it had been tagged as a copyright violation. I've asked for help from that editor, but without success. Just to be clear - at this point, I'm not making a complaint against that person, nor am I arguing that the sourced sentences I quoted constitute fair use. Both of those issues can be pursued elsewhere, if I have the energy. All I want to know is, please can someone (presumably it has to be an admin) have a look at the article, do whatever needs to be done, and remove the template? I want to get on with improving the article; I have a lot of great material to add and - I hope - an acceptably paraphrasical prose style with which to do so. Many thanks. Carbon Caryatid (talk) 19:59, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
- Looks like it's all sorted now. -----WRE) 20:31, 12 May 2018 (UTC)]
- Quick and efficient; thank you (both?) so much. Carbon Caryatid (talk) 20:33, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
- Hope that broke the log jam. Cheers. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 20:33, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
- Quick and efficient; thank you (both?) so much. Carbon Caryatid (talk) 20:33, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
- Looks like it's all sorted now. -----
A Dobos torte for you!
7&6=thirteen (☎) has given you a Dobos torte to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it.
To give a Dobos torte and spread the WikiLove, just place {{subst:Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. |
7&6=thirteen (☎) 19:14, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
A page you started (Drift whale) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Drift whale, Carbon Caryatid!
Wikipedia editor Cwmhiraeth just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
An interesting article and a useful addition to Wikipedia.
To reply, leave a comment on Cwmhiraeth's talk page.
Learn more about
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 19:05, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for your work on this article! Hope to see it promoted to Good article status some day. ---Another Believer (Talk) 13:38, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you! Do you know how it happened that the most (or second-most) obvious in-link (i.e. from Maggie Hambling) was lacking? Was that merely an oversight? It seems odd. Carbon Caryatid (talk) 13:56, 18 May 2018 (UTC)]
- Sure, just overlooked until you came along. Not to worry! ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:08, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
Category:Device to dry laundry has been nominated for discussion
Category:Device to dry laundry, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. PamD 17:27, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
- I think that both this and WP:CfD because I think this is the only way to change the name of a category. PamD 17:30, 20 May 2018 (UTC)]
- Also Category:Laundry worker. PamD 17:32, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks for your attention to this. I got some of the new categories right, I believe, e.g. Category:Laundry businesses. But I welcome any improvements. Carbon Caryatid (talk) 17:49, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
Category:Device to wash laundry has been nominated for discussion
Category:Device to wash laundry, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. PamD 17:34, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
Category:Laundry worker has been nominated for discussion
Category:Laundry worker, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. PamD 17:35, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
Any idea for a better hook. I would like to make this reviewer HAPPY. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 20:24, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
Category:Laundry law has been nominated for discussion
Category:Laundry law, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. TJRC (talk) 23:29, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 22
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited In Other Words Feminist Community Center, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Women's League (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
I've come across this sort of thing before, but this BLP strikes me as a particularly egregious example. Until a couple of months ago, it was a non-descript but unproblematic article about a writer. Then one anon edit quintupled the article length, adding sections on everything Smith has ever written. What is most startling is a long section entitled "Literary acclaim", which consists solely of uncontextualised quotes pulled from reviews. Strangely enough, no negative reviews are included, such as this rather waspish one by Theodore Dalrymple - "a strong vein of intellectualised humbug" - or this in the Guardian.
The thing is, many of the quotes are well sourced, so I don't want to strip them out willy-nilly. Others seem to be from the book
I've seen other BLPs undergo this sort of transformation, whether for money or not I cannot say. But this is such a clear example that I thought I would use it to ask for help. This sort of article isn't what the encyclopedia should be about. What is the best way to tackle this recurring problem? Templates to add, projects to alert? Carbon Caryatid (talk) 14:19, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- I think you would be better served using the article's talk page instead of here. - FlightTime (open channel) 14:57, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- My point is, it's not just that article. There are others that are similarly gaming the system. This is just the most recent to come to my attention. Carbon Caryatid (talk) 14:59, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- I have to agree with FlightTime; these are best handled on a case-by-case basis using the talk page. We do have some templates that you could use, e.g. {{Like resume}} or {{Unbalanced section}} but at the end of the day, all they achieve is the defacement of the article. Of course, if you see the same editor transforming multiple articles in that manner, then that's another story, but this rarely happens these days. 78.28.45.127 (talk) 16:39, 24 May 2018 (UTC)]
- @verifiabilityand text added to articles has to satisfy both sets of criteria has often been useful in my experience. I hope this helps.
- @
- I have to agree with FlightTime; these are best handled on a case-by-case basis using the talk page. We do have some templates that you could use, e.g. {{
- My point is, it's not just that article. There are others that are similarly gaming the system. This is just the most recent to come to my attention. Carbon Caryatid (talk) 14:59, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Drift whale
Disambiguation link notification for May 29
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Elsie Inglis Memorial Hospital (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Nursery
- Harpoon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Age of Steam
- Obstetrics (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to College of Physicians and Surgeons
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Women in Red June Editathons
Welcome to Women in Red's June 2018 worldwide online editathons.
| ||
(To subscribe: |
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:15, 29 May 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Disambiguation link notification for June 5
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Edith Vane-Tempest-Stewart, Marchioness of Londonderry (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Blakeney
- Feminist science fiction (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Raj
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:42, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
June 2018
Before adding a category to an article, as you did to Kimball Laundry Co. v. United States, please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. Categories must also be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Thank you. TJRC (talk) 19:48, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 12
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Zak Ové, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Great Court (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 19
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sally Miller Gearhart, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Conservative Christianity (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
Your submission at Rosemary Leith (June 23)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rosemary Leithand click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Hello, Carbon Caryatid!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 12:20, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
|
DYK for Drift whale
On 26 June 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Drift whale, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Icelandic word for "drift whale" translates as "windfall", since the washed-up carcass provides meat, blubber, fat, and other benefits to the finders (pictured)? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Drift whale. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Drift whale), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Gatoclass (talk) 00:01, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 26
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Adelaide Manning (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Married Women's Property Act
- Company town (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Social engineering
- Philippine Airlines Flight 434 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Tail number
- Victorian dress reform (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Temperance
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:39, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
July 2018 at Women in Red
Hello again from Women in Red!
| ||
(To subscribe: ] |
Disambiguation link notification for July 3
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Philippine Airlines Flight 434, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tail number (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
Edits to Chawton House July 2018
Perhaps you could contact me via the message link on my user page when you plan to made edits to this page. The merger of the two previous pages deliberately kept textual changes to a minimum, but further changes are planned so that this article will be extensively extended or expanded and improved. If you are able to contribute to this, I would be interested to hear from you, otherwise, if you think changes are needed, please can you drop me a line to discuss? Many thanks. Woodsail. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Woodsail (talk • contribs) 15:08, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks for this note, Woodsail. Discussions about articles are meant to be held on their talk pages, so I'll copy this to Talk:Chawton House and respond there. Carbon Caryatid (talk) 15:30, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 19
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Sir John Lethbridge, 1st Baronet (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to Gainsborough, Snyders and Vanderbilt
- Philippa Fawcett (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Gower Street
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
August 2018 at Women in Red
An exciting new month for Women in Red!
| ||
Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!): (To subscribe: ] |
Disambiguation link notification for July 26
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited George Monbiot, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rewilding (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
Category:Whaling jobs
Category:Whaling jobs has been nominated for merging. Please see Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2018_August_1#Category:Whaling_jobs.
Also, I have re-nominated Category:Laundry workers for further renaming, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2018 July 31. – Fayenatic London 08:23, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks for the heads-up Fayenatic; I've commented there. Carbon Caryatid (talk) 09:47, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 2
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Charles Tennant, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages William Couper and Alexander Dunlop (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 9
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John Parker (whaling master), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hull (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
September 2018 at Women in Red
September is an exciting new month for Women in Red's worldwide online editathons!
| ||
Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!):
(To subscribe: ] |
October 2018 at Women in Red
Please join us... We have four new topics for Women in Red's worldwide online editathons in October!
| ||
(To subscribe: ] |
Get ready for November with Women in Red!
Three new topics for WiR's online editathons in November, two of them supporting other initiatives
Continuing: | ||
Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!): (To subscribe: |
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:40, 14 October 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Disambiguation link notification for November 3
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Women's Library, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Reading room (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:34, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 12
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Lament for Icarus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Live Fast Die Young (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 19
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Queen's Hall, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blitz (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:34, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Carbon Caryatid. Voting in the
The
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
December 2018 at Women in Red
The WiR December editathons provide something for everyone.
Continuing: | ||
Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!): (To subscribe: ] |
Re: Ref desk query "On the variability of geographic names"
Hi, CC. As an IP user I can't currently answer on the Ref Desks because of the semi-protection, so I'm doing so here. I know of two schemes broadly congruent with what you ask: one is described at Global Location Number and the other at What3words. There may of course be others. {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} 90.202.210.56 (talk) 11:11, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks for taking the trouble. Isn't it ridiculous, that the RefDesks are locked to the point of uselessness. I was aware of W3W but not the former entity. I'll keep looking. I have in mind a project to list all the human names already associated with a place. Israel, to take an obvious example, is laden with points of ancient interest and conflict, and places such as the Wailing Wall will have very different names in different languages - unguessable versions, not simple translations. Or pre- and post-colonial names. Thanks again for your input. --Carbon Caryatid (talk) 18:13, 6 December 2018 (UTC)]
January 2019 at Women in Red
January 2019, Volume 5, Issue 1, Numbers 104-108
January events:
|
Disambiguation link notification for December 22
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sidney Rowlatt, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Raj (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
Yo Ho Ho
ϢereSpielChequers is wishing you Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's Solstice or Christmas, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hanukkah, Lenaia, Festivus or even the Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!
Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{}}~~~~ to your friends' talk pages.
ϢereSpielChequers 23:55, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Cross-dressing in music and opera
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read
the guide to writing your first article.to help you create articles.You may want to consider using the Article Wizard
A tag has been placed on
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by
- Thanks; it looks like someone else has already addressed this. I didn't add any info to the encyclopedia, just cutting from an overly baggy article (History of cross-dressing) to create a new one in parallel with e.g. Cross-dressing in literature. --Carbon Caryatid (talk) 18:33, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 30
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Garden at Buckingham Palace (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Summerhouse
- George Cornewall Lewis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Sarah Austin
- Hannah Greg (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Lancaster
- Vulgarity (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Cursing
- added a link pointing to
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 9
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Flensing (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Render
- History of whaling (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Beluga
- Rescue toboggan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Cross section
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:40, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 16
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Aimee Challenor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to Asexual and Trans people
- Beluga whale (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Echolocation
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:33, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 23
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mary, Countess of Harold, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Foundling (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
February 2019 at Women in Red
February 2019, Volume 5, Issue 2, Numbers 107-111
February events:
|
Thank you for being one of Wikipedia's top medical contributors!
The 2018 Cure Award | |
In 2018 you were one of the top ~250 medical editors across any language of Wikipedia. Thank you from Wiki Project Med Foundation for helping bring free, complete, accurate, up-to-date health information to the public. We really appreciate you and the vital work you do! Wiki Project Med Foundation is a user group whose mission is to improve our health content. Consider joining here, there are no associated costs. |
Thanks again :-) -- Doc James along with the rest of the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation 17:41, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 2
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Abolitionism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Enlightenment (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:41, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Rosemary Leith
Hello, Carbon Caryatid. It has been over six months since you last edited the
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
{{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Dolotta (talk) 20:15, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
March 2019 at Women in Red
March 2019, Volume 5, Issue 3, Numbers 107, 108, 112, 113
Please join us for these virtual events:
| ||
|
Disambiguation link notification for February 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to
- Transgender sexuality (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to Native Americans and Hijra
- Alexander Berry (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Edinburgh Magazine
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
April 2019 at Women in Red
April 2019, Volume 5, Issue 4, Numbers 107, 108, 114, 115, 116, 117
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:12, 27 March 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
May you join this month's editathons from WiR!
May 2019, Volume 5, Issue 5, Numbers 107, 108, 118, 119, 120, 121
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:16, 27 April 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
June events with WIR
June 2019, Volume 5, Issue 6, Numbers 107, 108, 122, 123, 124, 125
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:41, 22 May 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Caudle
Hi, Thankyou, truly, for getting together so useful and informative a collection of sources about what caudle is/was. I have long puzzled about why one needed spoons to "eat caudle" at the same time as having cups to drink it from. A general revival is long overdue! Eebahgum (talk) 10:24, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you for your kind words. I've gone back and made some more minor improvements. --Carbon Caryatid (talk) 16:58, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
July events from Women in Red!
July 2019, Volume 5, Issue 7, Numbers 107, 108, 126, 127, 128
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:39, 25 June 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
August 2019 at Women in Red
August 2019, Volume 5, Issue 7, Numbers 107, 108, 126, 129, 130, 131
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 06:43, 29 July 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
September 2019 at Women in Red
September 2019, Volume 5, Issue 9, Numbers 107, 108, 132, 133, 134, 135
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 16:23, 27 August 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
October Events from Women in Red
October 2019, Volume 5, Issue 10, Numbers 107, 108, 137, 138, 139, 140
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:35, 23 September 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Disambiguation link notification for October 20
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Muxe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page In the closet (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:36, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Bare URLs
Hello. I saw in your edits of
- Thanks for adding the templates. For some reason the software is playing up today and making it difficult. Carbon Caryatid (talk) 15:28, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
Edit at History of transgender people in the United States
I came to leave a note about this edit and was shocked to see that you're a long-time editor. If you honestly felt that a paragraph about a transgender murder suspect is
November 2019 at Women in Red
November 2019, Volume 5, Issue 11, Numbers 107, 108, 140, 141, 142, 143
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 22:57, 29 October 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
December events with WIR
December 2019, Volume 5, Issue 12, Numbers 107, 108, 144, 145, 146, 147
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:42, 25 November 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
January 2020 at Women in Red
January 2020, Volume 6, Issue 1, Numbers 146, 148, 149, 150, 151, 153
|
Disambiguation link notification for January 12
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mary Tighe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page White knight (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:55, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
Elizabeth Salmon
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q83031645 ... thanks. Good find. --Tagishsimon (talk) 21:29, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
- Also gives us an informative link at https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q2172000#P1066 and https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q83031645#P802 --Tagishsimon (talk) 21:36, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you! How long does it take for an item on WikiData to appear on the Redlist? I can't see Elizabeth Salmon on Wikipedia:WikiProject_Women_in_Red/Missing_articles_by_nationality United Kingdom.
- (Also, for my future notes, the 2nd ref I found to ES was in the introduction to Thomas Salmon (2012) by Benjamin Wardhaugh.) --Carbon Caryatid (talk) 09:11, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
February with Women in Red
February 2020, Volume 6, Issue 2, Numbers 150, 151, 152, 154, 155
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 19:31, 28 January 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Disambiguation link notification for February 4
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sherin Khankan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Call to prayer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:52, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 14
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Force-feeding, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Speculum (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:04, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 21
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Fanny Hill (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Fanny
- Sidney Rowlatt (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Preparatory school
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:11, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 13
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Andrew Ducrow (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Colossus
- Lunatic asylum (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Anna Wheeler
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:45, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
April 2020 at Women in Red
April 2020, Volume 6, Issue 4, Numbers 150, 151, 159, 160, 161, 162
Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 14:58, 23 March 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Disambiguation link notification for April 4
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited North Lincolnshire (UK Parliament constituency), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Soke (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:16, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 11
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Houseboy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American slang (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:14, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Pinging
Hi! It's possible I might have misunderstood your intention in that post over at the teahouse, but linking to an editor's user page will send them a notification, but linking to their talk page won't. You can have a look at Help:Notifications#Mentions – these notifications work in sometimes counter-intuitive ways. – Uanfala (talk) 13:43, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
- Hi! Thanks for this. I think what got me muddled is your sig. In trying to link to the first half of it, I got your talkpage (as I saw, too late) and not just your username.Carbon Caryatid (talk) 14:18, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived
Hi Carbon Caryatid! The thread you created at the archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread .
|
Disambiguation link notification for April 18
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 15:12, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 25
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Audience (meeting), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ascot (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:03, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
May 2020 at Women in Red
May 2020, Volume 6, Issue 5, Numbers 150, 151, 163, 164, 165, 166
Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 20:58, 29 April 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Disambiguation link notification for May 7
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lady Caroline Lamb, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mad, Bad and Dangerous to Know (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:45, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
June 2020 at Women in Red
Women in Red June 2020, Volume 6, Issue 6, Numbers 150, 151, 167, 168, 169
Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 17:10, 25 May 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Draft:Hermeneutics of feminism in Islam
Hi,
I came across this promising
Pl. do join to update and expansion, your help will be most welcome.
Thanks and regards
Bookku (talk) 05:45, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for pinging me. I don't have any specialist knowledge, but would be happy to improve the flow of the text and other wikignoming. Carbon Caryatid (talk) 13:03, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
July 2020 at Women in Red
Women in Red / July 2020, Volume 6, Issue 7, Numbers 150, 151, 170, 171, 172, 173
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 16:10, 28 June 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Category:Signatories to the Ladies' Petition for the Establishment of the Foundling Hospital has been nominated for deletion
Category:Signatories to the Ladies' Petition for the Establishment of the Foundling Hospital has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 12:46, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 3
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:19, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
Sources
Re you recent edits. Are you familiar with
- Thanks, I think. I was prepared to be pulled up on having used a source incorrectly (and it still happens, after all these years, still learning), and being politely reminded to check its reliability. But it seems you are asking for me to contribute my opinion. I'll consider. Mostly I confine myself to untangling articles that are written in messy prose. --Carbon Caryatid (talk) 12:44, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
- "Asking"? No. There are a lot of pitchforkers on Wikipedia, ever ready to point fingers and cry foul, so it's important to note the difference between solicitation and having someone become aware of something, which in this case was not specified or linked directly. Pyxis Solitary (yak). L not Q. 15:45, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
- Point taken. I appreciate being made aware of many things. --Carbon Caryatid (talk) 18:32, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
- "Asking"? No. There are a lot of pitchforkers on Wikipedia, ever ready to point fingers and cry foul, so it's important to note the difference between solicitation and having someone become aware of something, which in this case was not specified or linked directly. Pyxis Solitary (yak). L not Q. 15:45, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 10
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Whaler, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Pequod and Crowsnest (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 17
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John Hewlett, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hackney (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for this edit on the 4th of July. However in future please use the dedicated template {{cite EB1911}}
for making such links. It has several advantages.
1. Brevity:
{{cite EB1911|wstitle=Shipley, Jonathan |volume=24 |page=982}}
Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). . Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 24 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 982.
2. The template uses Interwiki linking rather than a url.
3. It placs the article in to hidden maintance categories, which helps people who participate in the Wikipedia:WikiProject Encyclopaedia Britannica.
-- PBS (talk) 16:56, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
August 2020 at Women in Red
Women in Red | August 2020, Volume 6, Issue 8, Numbers 150, 151, 173, 174, 175
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:50, 26 July 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
September Women in Red edithons
Women in Red | September 2020, Volume 6, Issue 9, Numbers 150, 151, 176, 177
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:53, 29 August 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Nomination of List of coupled cousins for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of coupled cousins is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of coupled cousins until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Nihil novi (talk) 04:44, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
October editathons from Women in Red
Women in Red | October 2020, Volume 6, Issue 10, Numbers 150, 173, 178, 179
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:09, 21 September 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Template:Navbox x-word has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Satellizer el Bridget (Talk) 09:33, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
November edit-a-thons from Women in Red
Women in Red | November 2020, Volume 6, Issue 11, Numbers 150, 173, 178, 180, 181
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:52, 28 October 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Happy First Edit Day!
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
December with Women in Red
Women in Red | December 2020, Volume 6, Issue 12, Numbers 150, 173, 178, 182, 183
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:43, 26 November 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
A New Year With Women in Red!
Women in Red | January 2021, Volume 7, Issue 1, Numbers 182, 184, 185, 186, 187, 188
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 03:01, 29 December 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
February 2021 at Women in Red
Women in Red | February 2021, Volume 7, Issue 2, Numbers 184, 186, 188, 189, 190, 191
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 14:58, 27 January 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Disambiguation link notification for January 31
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Dig (2021 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blitz.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 12
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited St Luke's Church, Kentish Town, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bishop of Edmonton.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
March 2021 at Women in Red
Women in Red | March 2021, Volume 7, Issue 3, Numbers 184, 186, 188, 192, 193
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:47, 26 February 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Disambiguation link notification for February 27
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hannah Cowley, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Siege of Acre.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:19, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
April editathons from Women in Red
Women in Red | April 2021, Volume 7, Issue 4, Numbers 184, 188, 194, 195, 196
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 20:15, 22 March 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Disambiguation link notification for March 27
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Squatting in England and Wales
- added links pointing to Georgian and Mutual aid
- Birthing center
- added a link pointing to Fetal monitoring
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Anna Laetitia Barbauld Featured article review
I have nominated
Disambiguation link notification for April 19
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wilfrid Jasper Walter Blunt, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Haileybury.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:51, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 27
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Laundry
- added a link pointing to Zulu
- Retinue
- added a link pointing to Supernumerary
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
May 2021 at Women in Red
Women in Red | May 2021, Volume 7, Issue 5, Numbers 184, 188, 197, 198
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 21:35, 28 April 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Disambiguation link notification for May 4
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Laundry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Zulu.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:52, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
Interview
Hi, I am a PhD student at University College London (UK), researching the collective production of knowledge. Wikipedia is my main case study. Would you be able/willing to talk to me about your activity on Wikipedia?
I have submitted my project to the Wikipedia research committee for guidance. You can find the full summary here: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Sociotechnical_epistemology:_how_do_we_foster_good_practices_in_collective_knowledge-production%3F
There's more on my user page and you can ask me any questions. We can discuss identification, uses of data and so forth before talking as well. If you're interested, you can contact me via my Talk page, or by emailing me at [email protected]
Thanks! ElenaFalco (talk) 15:30, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
June 2021 at Women in Red
Women in Red | June 2021, Volume 7, Issue 6, Numbers 184, 188, 196, 199, 200, 201
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:49, 28 May 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
July 2021 at Women in Red
Women in Red | July 2021, Volume 7, Issue 7, Numbers 184, 188, 202, 203, 204, 205
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 16:04, 22 June 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Disambiguation link notification for June 23
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Kitchen garden
- added a link pointing to Allotment
- William Ogilvie (Ardglass)
- added a link pointing to Allotment
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Hello Carbon Caryatid. I have removed some copyright content you had included in the above article. I'm not sure but I think it may have been your intention that it was a quotation? If so, you need to either put it in a block quote template or add quotation marks. Indenting does nothing. Thanks. — Diannaa (talk) 00:46, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 30
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Harriet Wistrich, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Burgess.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 12
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited History of Taormina, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Isola Bella.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 19
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Brook House (Park Lane), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hyde Park.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
August Editathons at Women in Red
Women in Red | August 2021, Volume 7, Issue 8, Numbers 184, 188, 204, 205, 206, 207
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:24, 23 July 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
September 2021 at Women in Red
Women in Red | September 2021, Volume 7, Issue 9, Numbers 184, 188, 204, 205, 207, 208
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 22:29, 26 August 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hello. Help improve and copy edit. Thanks you. Kolpb (talk) 09:08, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
- Why do you bring this article to my attention, Kolpb? --Carbon Caryatid (talk) 09:20, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
October 2021 at Women in Red
Women in Red | October 2021, Volume 7, Issue 10, Numbers 184, 188, 209, 210, 211
Special event:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 01:34, 29 September 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
A cup of tea for you!
To drink at the WikiAda24.org events. Thanks for you help. Do reach out to newbies and rope them in Victuallers (talk) 12:02, 12 October 2021 (UTC) |
November 2021 at Women in Red
Women in Red | November 2021, Volume 7, Issue 11, Numbers 184, 188, 210, 212, 213
|
--Innisfree987 (talk) 21:27, 24 October 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Happy First Edit Day!
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
December 2021 at Women in Red
Women in Red | December 2021, Volume 7, Issue 12, Numbers 184, 188, 210, 214, 215, 216
|
--Innisfree987 (talk) 00:10, 27 November 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Disambiguation link notification for November 27
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited New Covent Garden Market, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Smithfield.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Wizard of Oz
See Federation of Australia... AnonMoos (talk) 00:53, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 4
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited L. Frank Baum, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Herland.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
Yo Ho Ho
ϢereSpielChequers is wishing you a griffin's claw full of Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's Solstice or Christmas, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hanukkah, Lenaia, Festivus or even the Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!
Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{}} to your friends' talk pages.
January 2022 Women in Red
Happy New Year from Women in Red Jan 2022, Vol 8, Issue 1, Nos 214, 216, 217, 218, 219
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:02, 28 December 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
February with Women in Red
Women in Red Feb 2022, Vol 8, Issue 2, Nos 214, 217, 220, 221, 222
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:09, 31 January 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Disambiguation link notification for February 26
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tulse Hill School, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Black history and CSE.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
March editathons
Women in Red Mar 2022, Vol 8, Issue 3, Nos 214, 217, 222, 223, 224, 225
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:37, 27 February 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Scottish Suffrage/ttes event
Hello again Carbon Caryatid!
Thanks for attending the Protests & Suffragettes / Women's History Scotland International Women's Day Wiki workshop. It was great to meet everyone and I hope that you'll join us for a future event. You can see what we achieved last night here.
- To keep up to date about Wikimedia events happening throughout Scotland, to learn more about ScotWiki projects, or to publicise your own ScotWiki event or project, join the ScotWiki Mailing List!
-
Thanks for joining us!
Lirazelf (talk) 12:29, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
A goat for you from P&S and Women's History Scotland!
Many thanks for attending our Scottish Suffrage/ttes Wikipedia Workshop. We hope that you enjoyed the talks, learning about how to edit Wikipedia and #MakingWikipediaBetter with your edits.
Our next event will be in the third week of April. Please watch out for more details on our social media channels and the Protests and Suffragettes page.
April Editathons from Women in Red
Women in Red Apr 2022, Vol 8, Issue 4, Nos 214, 217, 226, 227, 228
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:44, 22 March 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
April 2022
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Gender neutrality in English, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- NotCharizard 🗨 15:56, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 24
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lady, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American slang.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
May Women in Red events
Women in Red May 2022, Vol 8, Issue 5, Nos 214, 217, 227, 229, 230
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:51, 30 April 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Disambiguation link notification for May 11
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jay Blades, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Channel 5.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Bobby Ionides
Hello, Carbon Caryatid. It has been over six months since you last edited the
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 15:55, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
June events from Women in Red
Women in Red June 2022, Vol 8, Issue 6, Nos 214, 217, 227, 231, 232, 233
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 09:19, 31 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Disambiguation link notification for June 15
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sir Charles Hudson, 1st Baronet, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Selwyn.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red in July 2022
Women in Red July 2022, Vol 8, Issue 7, Nos 214, 217, 234, 235
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:45, 27 June 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Disambiguation link notification for July 1
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Carsten Borchgrevink, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Antarctic whales.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red in August 2022
Women in Red August 2022, Vol 8, Issue 8, Nos 214, 217, 236, 237, 238, 239
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:57, 29 July 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red in September 2022
Women in Red September 2022, Vol 8, Issue 9, Nos 214, 217, 240, 241
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:34, 31 August 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red October 2022
Women in Red October 2022, Vol 8, Issue 10, Nos 214, 217, 242, 243, 244
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 14:58, 29 September 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Disambiguation link notification for October 12
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Walter Besant
- added links pointing to Gaspard de Coligny and People's Palace
- Holly Lodge Estate
- added a link pointing to Lodge
- People's Palace, Mile End
- added a link pointing to People's Palace
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 19
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Walter Besant
- added links pointing to Gaspard de Coligny and People's Palace
- Holly Lodge Estate
- added a link pointing to Lodge
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red November 2022
Women in Red November 2022, Vol 8, Issue 11, Nos 214, 217, 245, 246, 247
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 17:32, 26 October 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Happy First Edit Day!
Happy First Edit Day! Hi Carbon Caryatid! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:37, 3 November 2022 (UTC) |
Women in Red December 2022
Women in Red December 2022, Vol 8, Issue 12, Nos 214, 217, 248, 249, 250
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:53, 26 November 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the
The
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
Yo Ho Ho
ϢereSpielChequers is wishing you Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's Solstice or Christmas, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hanukkah, Lenaia, Festivus or even the Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!
Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{}}~~~~ to your friends' talk pages.
ϢereSpielChequers 19:22, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red January 2023
Happy New Year from Women in Red | January 2023, Volume 9, Issue 1, Nos 250, 251, 252, 253, 254
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:00, 27 December 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red in February 2023
Women in Red Feb 2023, Vol 9, Iss 2, Nos 251, 252, 255, 256, 257, 259
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:26, 30 January 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red March 2023
Women in Red Mar 2023, Vol 9, Iss 3, Nos 251, 252, 258, 259, 260, 261
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 12:52, 26 February 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Requesting inputs
Requesting your inputs about few more queries @ Wikipedia talk:Did you know#Bicycling in Islam. This request is being made to you since previously you seem to have contributed in this topic area. Bookku (talk) 06:06, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Original Barnstar | |
Hi CC. I just saw a great article that you seem to have been the midwife to. Thank you for your work on Reading Abbey Girls' School. So many notable former Women in Red are mentioned in your article.
I tweeted it here Victuallers (talk) 20:18, 9 March 2023 (UTC) |
Splitting discussion for Clitoris
An article that you have edited or that may interest you, (Clitoris), has content that I have proposed to be removed and moved to another article, (Human clitoris). If you are interested, please visit the discussion. Thank you. Peaceray (talk) 05:40, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red April 2023
Women in Red Apr 2023, Vol 9, Iss 4, Nos 251, 252, 262, 263, 264, 265, 266
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:51, 27 March 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red May 2023
Women in Red May 2023, Vol 9, Iss 5, Nos 251, 252, 267, 268, 269, 270
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:27, 27 April 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red - June 2023
Women in Red June 2023, Vol 9, Iss 6, Nos 251, 252, 271, 272, 273
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 09:15, 28 May 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red July 2023
Women in Red June 2023, Vol 9, Iss 7, Nos 251, 252, 274, 275, 276
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:42, 27 June 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red 8th Anniversary
Women in Red 8th Anniversary | |
In July 2015 around 15.5% of the English Wikipedia's biographies were about women. As of July 2023, 19.61% of the English Wikipedia's biographies are about women. That's a lot of biographies created in the effort to close the gender gap. Happy 8th Anniversary! Join us for some virtual cake and add comments or memories and please keep on editing to close the gap! |
--Lajmmoore (talk) 11:00, 18 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red August 2023
Women in Red August 2023, Vol 9, Iss 8, Nos 251, 252, 277, 278, 279, 280
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 19:24, 28 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Disambiguation link notification for August 2
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Native Americans in German popular culture, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cowboys and Indians.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
September 2023 at Women In Red
Women in Red September 2023, Vol 9, Iss 9, Nos 251, 252, 281, 282, 283
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Victuallers (talk) 16:49, 25 August 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red October 2023
Women in Red October 2023, Vol 9, Iss 10, Nos 251, 252, 284, 285, 286
See also
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:51, 29 September 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red - November 2023
Women in Red November 2023, Vol 9, Iss 11, Nos 251, 252, 287, 288, 289
See also Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 08:21, 26 October 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Happy First Edit Day!
Happy First Edit Day! Hi Carbon Caryatid! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! The Herald (Benison) (talk) 17:04, 3 November 2023 (UTC) |
CS1 error on Conradin
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Conradin, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a
Women in Red December 2023
Women in Red December 2023, Vol 9, Iss 12, Nos 251, 252, 290, 291, 292
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:22, 27 November 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the
The
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
Women in Red January 2024
Women in Red | January 2024, Volume 10, Issue 1, Numbers 291, 293, 294, 295, 296
Announcement
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
Women in Red February 2024
Women in Red | February 2024, Volume 10, Issue 2, Numbers 293, 294, 297, 298
Announcement
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:07, 28 January 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red March 2024
Women in Red | March 2024, Volume 10, Issue 3, Numbers 293, 294, 299, 300, 301
Announcements
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:21, 25 February 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red April 2024
Women in Red | April 2024, Volume 10, Issue 4, Numbers 293, 294, 302, 303, 304
Announcements
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 19:41, 30 March 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging