User talk:Chesipiero

I'm seeing huge problems with recent changes you've made. I'm seeing changes to the locations of the lights which are in contradiction to the light lists and which have no citations, and dates which don't seem to come from anywhere. I don't want to have to go through a mass revert, but in Delaware in particular I've been over every light listed and I'm having a hard time seeing how the changes you're making can be justified. Mangoe (talk) 21:44, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And please lose the word "parallelepiped". It's misleading when it isn't inaccurate, not to mention few people remember what it means. Mangoe (talk) 01:05, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as American Shoal Light. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 20:29, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Chesipiero, Thanks for all of your recent lighthouse article edits. Please could you be a bit more careful with the use of those lighthouse stub tags though. I recently removed one from Mystic Seaport Light which is a recognized Good Article. Can I suggest that you check the talk page first before adding these tags in the future, and maybe add the tag as a separate edit rather than include it with other edits (so it can be spotted more easily). All the best (I will watch here for any reply)...Jokulhlaup (talk) 18:02, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I’ll follow your suggestions.Chesipiero (talk) 20:32, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Chesipiero, I recently joined Wikipedia and learning a lot from it, since it will be the research group in my Master´s Thesis. I am searching for active, valuable members of the Aviation Wikiproject who may want to be interviewed for this work. Check my userpage or contact me if you would be open to cooperating! Thanks in advance and all the best! Kind regards, Iasalcan (talk) 11:23, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

		The Lighthouse Barnstar
		Awarded for all of your hard work in adding Info boxes to the world’s lighthouses. Well done...Jokulhlaup (talk) 11:07, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the “Award” you gave me. I tried to complete the Infoboxes giving all an uniform, correct language and data presentation. All the best. Chesipiero (talk) 15:28, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, glad you liked it...Jokulhlaup (talk) 16:14, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Chesipiero.

talk!) 12:01, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

On 24 September 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article High and Low Lights of North Shields, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Black Middens were avoided by aligning the Lights of North Shields (pictured)? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, High and Low Lights of North Shields), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 00:01, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for your lighthouse lists! We'd love you to put them up on Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge board and contribute regularly to this (starting the lighthouses too) so other editors can view them and get more people interested!♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:02, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that! Shocking isn't it how many articles on African lighthouses we're missing! Hope you're interested in starting them all ;-)♦ Dr. Blofeld 09:16, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The lighthouse is on a different island of the same name further north. You should've read the description or checked the coordinates first before editing the article. ST1849 (talk) 16:14, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating List of lighthouses in Kuwait, Chesipiero!

Wikipedia editor

This list looks OK, but try to make pages for the redlinks or just avoid placing redlinks in your page all together. Thank you for contributing!

To reply, leave a comment on UNSC Luke 1021's

Learn more about

Wikipedia:WikiProject Latin America/The 10,000 Challenge is up now ;-)♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:05, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Chesipiero. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

From the icy Canajian north; to you and yours! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 21:44, 26 December 2016 (UTC) [reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the List of lighthouses in Canada page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

Hi there,

I noticed that you've classified this new article as a stub and I'm wondering why. (I created the article so of course I have an interest.)

The article quality grading scheme at Wikiproject Lighthouses says that a stub "is either a very short article or a rough collection of information that will need much work to become a meaningful article." And that it "Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. Readers probably see insufficiently developed features of the topic and may not see how the features of the topic are significant." And that "The best solution for a Stub-class Article to step up to a Start-class Article is to add in referenced reasons of why the topic is significant."

Gannet Rock Lighthouse is 957 words long and - I would have thought - adequately referenced with inline citations to 14 separate sources. It's reasonably well structured with an infobox, pushpin map and image. Not enough for Start class?

Thanks! HazelAB (talk) 18:37, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Araranguá Lighthouse, Chesipiero!

Wikipedia editor Mduvekot just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks!

To reply, leave a comment on Mduvekot's

Learn more about

Hello, just curious why you reverted my minor changes at Sidi Fredj, since you didn't explain in the edit summary. I looked over my changes and don't see a clear problem, so I must be missing something. Please let me know, as I'd like to understand. Thanks! Jessicapierce (talk) 17:03, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Please note that

Please stop adding maps that cause a location marker to display outside the map, as you have done in Clarence Island (South Shetland Islands) and Cornwallis Island (South Shetland Islands).

Doing this makes WP look unprofessional. Locations marks should not be off in the margin of an article or any other stray location. In addition to visual error in the article, it creates map location errors. See Category:Location maps with possible errors. These are currently the only two mainspace articles in the entire encyclopedia with such errors.

If you can find or make another map of the Antarctic Peninsula that includes a wider area, go ahead and add one. MB 00:59, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Chesipiero! Was your revert made here on purpose? Or as it unintentional? I ask because the content doesn't make sense and appears to be possible vandalism. Let me know. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 16:55, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Chesipiero. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot for enhancing the Antarctic glacier articles. Just wanted to let you know that the main source for these articles, the GNIS database, normally (at least records from the 1960's and earlier) gives distances in nautical miles, not statute miles. You can read more about this in this old discussion: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Missing_encyclopedic_articles/Antarctica#miles? - 4ing (talk) 22:22, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to me that you misunderstood my message. When GNIS says that

Gair Glacier is 10 miles long, it is 10 nautical miles long. And the accuracy should not be in decimal numbers when converting to statute.miles or kilometres - the values are not very accurate. I've updated some of your recent edits to what I think is a fair representation of the source data. - 4ing (talk) 18:23, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

...to you and yours, from the Great White North! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 23:42, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas Chesipiero!!
Hi Chesipiero, I wish you and your family a very Merry Christmas and a very Happy New Year,
Thanks for all your help and contributions on the 'pedia! ,
   –Davey2010 ^{Merry Xmas / Happy New Year} 22:44, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Chesipiero, you need to check Category:Pages using duplicate arguments in template calls, because all of your lighthouse edits from today are showing up in there because of a template error. You have the class field appearing twice. Can you fix the templates please. Thanks. - X201 (talk) 08:41, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The oleo strut of the F.E.2's undercarriage is of course well known - and well referenced. Just two sources that come to mind are:

• Hare, Paul R. The Royal Aircraft Factory. London: Putnam, 1990. ISBN 0-85177-843-7, pp.208-209.
• Cheesman, E.F., ed. Fighter Aircraft of the 1914–1918 War. Letchworth, UK: Harleyford, 1960. pp. 44-45.

I have nonetheless run into a bit of conflict with someone with interests from "a later war" who disputes this - perhaps on the authority of works documenting more modern "oleo struts". I wonder if you could apply an impartial eye on this one? --Soundofmusicals (talk) 23:50, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I just wanted to point out to you that

Hello, Chesipiero. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

FWiW Bzuk (talk) 00:17, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. A discussion is taking place as to whether the article VIF Airways is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

Please do comment. Trinidade (talk) 03:32, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Chesipiero, greetings from Coreca. I am writing to greet you and know how you are. I'm quite fine. I am writing to ask you for your extraordinary intervention regarding the Coreca reefs, if you could possibly give a correction and an anglicization to the grammar, syntax and morphology of the article about my town, Coreca. Just and no more than 20 minutes of your precious time. Sure of your certain answer and help, and waiting to hear from you, I thank you in advance for what you did, do and do for me. many greetings!--Luigi Salvatore Vadacchino (talk) 04:27, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of aircraft operated by Alitalia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Indiscriminate list of individual aircraft is really not a noteworthy subject for wikipedia which is why such listings dont exit here but are more suited to enthusiast web sites, also note that there has been 50,000 airliners produced and hardly any of them are noteworthy.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MilborneOne (talk) 17:18, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Just for your information a good example of a list of "historic" aircraft operated by an airline article is List of aircraft operated by Braathens. MilborneOne (talk) 17:28, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize for my revert of your edits to 118 (number). I had too many windows open, and was attempting to revert nonsense edits to 57. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 04:04, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

You are invited in List of airlines of Italy talk page about NEOS. As a recurrent editor, your contribution will be higly appreciated.

Thank you Riktetta (talk) 12:13, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm CrazyBoy826. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. CrazyBoy826 (talk | contribs) 16:04, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that aircraft images are NOT allowed to be included in aircraft charts. We have guidelines on how these charts are supposed to look and you cannot change those at will - you also destroy our work to maintain those charts in shape. Your changes will therfore be considered vandalism. Refer to the aviation portal and WP:AIRLINES for further info. Best regards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.174.168.15 (talk) 09:38, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Checking in with you since you created the article and seem to be something of a lighthouse specialist ... as I mention on the talk page, it's registered as a Canadian historic place as the Pendlebury Lighthouse. Perhaps a name change is in order? --Cornellier (talk) 21:13, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Mathsci (talk) 11:45, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It would be very helpful if you please do not add em items to reflist - it no longer needs to be added, the template itself is now designed to create columns without assistance - thanks JarrahTree 22:56, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please see

The Italian wikipedia article for Cantiere navale di Fiume/Cantiere navali del Quarnaro does not capitalize "navali". Brescia's book does, but I suspect that its editors changed his manuscript to follow English capitalization rules, not Italian ones. Since English wiki follows the capitalization rules of the original languages, I expect that you'll be reverting all those changes to the shipyard names.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:08, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rather than add a not very informative laundry list like you've been doing, I think it would be far more efficient to add the shipyard to the category of "ships built by X", although you will probably have to create some of the categories.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 22:07, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Should most if not all dependent or overseas territories have their own Lists of something in Foo for any lists on any specific topics or subjects? Discussion has been kick-started at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Lighthouses#Dependent/overseas territories. 219.76.24.210 (talk) 10:58, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[1] [2] Which Christmas Island should have their own list? The Kiribati one or Australian one? 219.76.24.200 (talk) 13:00, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Coordinates of Kottas camp of Germany in Antarctica is pointing to the north of Atlantic ocean 61°01′S 9°45′W, this is out of the area of Heimefront Range [field camps] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Awisaka (talk • contribs) 07:58, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The WikiEagle

The WikiProject Aviation Newsletter

Volume I — Issue 1
Aviation Project • Project discussion • Members • Assessment • Outreach • The WikiEagle
Announcements After over a decade of silence, the WikiProject Aviation newsletter is making a comeback under the name The WikiEagle. This first issue was sent to all active members of the project and its sub-projects. If you wish to continue receiving The WikiEagle, you can add your username to the mailing list. For now the newsletter only covers general project news and is run by only one editor. If you wish to help or to become a columnist, please let us know. If you have an idea which you believe would improve the newsletter, please share it; suggestions are welcome and encouraged. On 16 December, an RfC was closed which determined theaerodrome.com to be an unreliable source. The website, which is cited over 1,500 articles, mainly on WWI aviation, as of the publishing of this issue. Luft46.com has been added to the list of problematic sources after this discussion. The Jim Lovell article was promoted to Featured Article status on 26 December after being nominated by Hawkeye7. The Raymond Hesselyn article was promoted to Good Article status on 4 December after being nominated by Zawed. The Supermarine Sea King article was promoted to Good Article status on 22 December after being nominated by Amitchell125. The William Hodgson (RAF officer) article was promoted to Good Article status on 26 December after being nominated by Zawed.
Members New Members KingAviationKid (Joined on 17 December) PatrickChiao (Joined on 22 December) Wp9097 (Joined on 16 December) Number of active members: 386. Total number of members: 921. Closed Discussions Featured Article assessment Jim Lovell (discussion) – Closed as promoted on 26 December 2021 Good Article assessment HAL Tejas (discussion) – Closed as not promoted on 30 December 2021 William Hodgson (RAF officer) (discussion) – Closed as promoted on 26 December 2021 Supermarine Sea King (discussion) – Closed as promoted on 22 December 2021 Raymond Hesselyn (discussion) – Closed as promoted on 4 December 2021 Deletion Timeline of Berlin Brandenburg Airport's construction (discussion ) – Closed as delete and redirect on 30 December 2021 Evergreen International Airlines Flight 17 (discussion) – Closed as keep on 25 December 2021 Requested moves Akbarpur (Ambedkar Nagar) Airstrip → Akbarpur Airstrip (discussion ) – Closed as moved on 30 December 2021 1983 Avensa Douglas DC-9 crash → Avensa Flight 007 (discussion ) – Closed as moved on 30 December 2021 Garuda Indonesia Flight 035 → Garuda Indonesian Airways Flight 035 (discussion) – Withdrawn on 28 December 2021	Article Statistics This data reflects values from DMY. Aviation pages by quality Quality Total FA 142 FL 15 A 56 GA 505 B 4,573 C 11,878 Start 15,082 Stub 18,754 List 2,539 Category 11,638 Disambig 653 File 2,713 Portal 629 Project 89 Redirect 1,518 Template 2,489 NA 66 Assessed 73,339 Unassessed 1 Total 73,340 WikiWork factors (?) ω = 250,758 Ω = 4.93
New/Ongoing Discussions Featured Article review D. B. Cooper (discussion) – Since 14 December 2021 A-class Article assessment Granville Gee Bee Model A (discussion) – Since 21 April 2020 List of aviation shootdowns and accidents during the Iraq War (discussion) – Since 22 February 2010 Good Article assessment Romanian Air Corps (discussion) – Since 25 December 2021 Jean Batten (discussion) – Since 2 October 2021 Merger proposals List of astronauts by name → List of astronauts by year of selection (discussion) – Since 10 August 2021 List of cosmonauts → List of space travelers by nationality (discussion) – Since 10 August 2021 List of space travelers by name → List of space travelers by nationality (discussion ) – Since 10 August 2021 Holidays Czech Airlines → Czech Airlines (discussion ) – Since 23 June 2021 Bendix Aviation → Bendix Corporation (discussion ) – Since 30 May 2021 discussion ) – Since 29 May 2021 discussion ) – Since 28 May 2021 Splitting proposals Family Airlines (discussion) – Since 23 November 2021 2021 Kabul airport attack (discussion) – Since 24 September 2021 discussion ) – Since 16 August 2021 Braniff International Airways (discussion) – Since 8 September 2019 Deletion List of maiden voyages (discussion) – Since 29 December 2021 Requested moves discussion ) – Since 30 December 2021 Aeropostal Alas de Venezuela Flight 108 → Aeropostal Alas de Venezuela Flight 109 (discussion) – Since 28 December 2021 Garuda Indonesia Flight 150 → Garuda Indonesian Airways Flight 150 (discussion ) – Since 28 December 2021 Garuda Indonesia Flight 206 → Garuda Indonesian Airways Flight 206 (discussion ) – Since 28 December 2021 Garuda Indonesia Flight 708 → Garuda Indonesian Airways Flight 708 (discussion ) – Since 28 December 2021 Garuda Indonesia Flight 892 → Garuda Indonesian Airways Flight 892 (discussion ) – Since 28 December 2021 TWA Flight 800 (1996) (discussion ) – Since 27 December 2021 Dynamic International Airways Flight 405 (discussion ) – Since 26 December 2021 CommutAir Flight 4281 → CommutAir Flight 4821 (discussion ) – Since 25 December 2021 discussion ) – Since 13 December 2021 discussion ) – Since 13 December 2021 discussion ) – Since 13 December 2021 Did you know Ravish Malhotra (discussion) – Since 30 December 2021 Alexander Tahy (discussion) – Since 26 December 2021 Veronica Volkersz (discussion) – Since 6 December 2021 Rudolf Szepessy-Sokoll (discussion) – Since 3 December 2021 On The Main Page Did you know... ... that the aerobatic demonstration aircraft used by SoloTürk is also used in military operations of the Turkish Air Force? (24 December)
Discuss & propose changes to The WikiEagle at The WikiEagle talk page. To opt in/out of receiving this news letter, add or remove your username from the mailing list. Newsletter contributor: ZLEA

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:35, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The WikiEagle

The WikiProject Aviation Newsletter

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:25, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The WikiEagle

The WikiProject Aviation Newsletter

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The WikiEagle

The WikiProject Aviation Newsletter

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:18, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I am DinosaurTrexXX33, I would just like to know why you are deleting parts of

Hi. I am no deleting part of Florence page! I follow the Wikipedia:WikiProject Cities/Settlements: Article structure subdision ! Chesipiero (talk) 15:31, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, thanks! You're doing very well btw!

(chat?) 15:35, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

The WikiEagle

The WikiProject Aviation Newsletter

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:33, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you deleting infos from articles and then re-pasting them in it? If you want to change the order of the sections, please just move them in the correct order without deleting and re-create them as if you were the author of those infos.--Alienautic (talk) 13:35, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting infos

Hi. I am no deleting infos from article, I just follow the Wikipedia:WikiProject Cities/Settlements: Article structure subdivisions ! It is clear that I am not the author of the article, it is sufficient to check “View history” of the page to understand what I make.

Chesipiero (talk) 14:08, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I understood, but that's not the correct way to do that. Please, just move the infos within the article without deleting and re-pasting them.--Alienautic (talk) 16:20, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, you would be right but its not simply with long article. Chesipiero (talk) 16:40, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

why did you do that?? Irtapil (talk) 06:57, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You don't respecedt the layout of the list (table). The stations you added are already in the list, it's sufficient to update them. Chesipiero (talk) 09:28, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Chesipiero

Thank you for creating Compagnia Toscana Trasporti Nord.

Good start. I marked as reviewed. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 01:26, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:11, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Happy New Year!

Chesipiero,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. See this for background context.
— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 17:16, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 17:16, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

When editing the Research stations in Antarctica, I noticed that you updated the coordinates of Kunlun and Taishan, moving them by 23 m and 1.56 km respectively. Kunlun can be easily verified, but where did the new coordinates of Taishan come from? Fernando Trebien (talk) 03:23, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's not easy to fix the coordinates for such research stations. I verified from the Antarctic Station Catalogue (pdf) published by COMNAP. From Google maps the station it's not yet visible as others. Chesipiero (talk) 13:52, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Although COMNAP is sometimes a little inaccurate, this is a good source for lack of better alternatives, so thanks for the clarification. --Fernando Trebien (talk) 15:00, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, why did you re-enter the wrong information on the page Autolinee Toscane? Ornamento della Cultura (talk) 12:23, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Chesipiero (talk) 15:13, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Atlantic Island Airways has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 17 § Atlantic Island Airways until a consensus is reached. Carguychris (talk) 20:51, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Template:Glaciers of Bouvet Island has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:15, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]