User talk:Chidgk1

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Wildlife of Turkey, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

. Thanks, ]

COP16

puedes actualizar la sede oficial de la cumbre que se realizará en Cali, Colombia a finales del 2024 https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024_United_Nations_Biodiversity_Conference https://euro.eseuro.com/local/2201567.html#google_vignette

57ntaledane90 (talk) 12:40, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Don’t worry about perfect English - make the edit and as long as it is properly sourced and understandable someone else will copyedit Chidgk1 (talk) 15:00, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also suggest you create the article in your language Chidgk1 (talk) 15:02, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive
March 2024 Backlog Drive: On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here or ask questions here.
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Chidgk1! I know I sometimes disagree with your suggestions in the talk page, but I do not want to discourage you. Given your interest in this article and that you are a very experienced editor, would you be interested in improving this article? We can take it slowly, perhaps over several months lol. After the lead, I was thinking of going from top to bottom, starting with Name and History sections. Btw, it's a Level 3 article, same level with Climate change. Bogazicili (talk) 22:00, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the compliment but no sorry definitely not as I cannot face such a struggle. However I hope to continue to bring some lower level Turkey articles to good standard so anyone working on the Turkey article may be able to pick out their most important points. My next target is Forest in Turkey. Chidgk1 (talk) 06:39, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Are you sure? There's a $100 cash prize lol, you can have it all. Bogazicili (talk) 18:37, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely sure. Can’t think of a joke at the moment. So from your userid you either live near the Bosporus or are missing it? I don’t live in Istanbul but very occasionally visit and enjoy the ferryboats Chidgk1 (talk) 06:38, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was just joking, didn't really think $100 would entice you. I'm not rich enough to live near the Bosporus, but Bogazici is also a university :) Bogazicili (talk) 17:26, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I had forgotten to give you a barnstar when I asked for your help with the article btw. I had noticed your contributions to Turkey-related articles such as Climate change in Turkey :) Bogazicili (talk) 16:26, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		For your contributions to climate-change-related and Turkey-related articles! Bogazicili (talk) 16:23, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Çok tşk. İyi Ramazanlar Chidgk1 (talk) 17:17, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your help. I've expanded and updated the artcile according to your request. I guess I did not forget something necessary. Would you please have a look at that. Cheers. CeeGee 11:24, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Have done some copyediting but not being a lawyer sorry I am not competent to check the translation of the statement by the Turkish Bars Association Chidgk1 (talk) 18:27, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Panthera pardus tulliana, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

. Thanks, ]

Question

Am I allowed to make a subsection of common names on the page of panther pardus tuliana? Firekong1 (talk) 16:34, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am not an expert on Wikipedia rules but I have no objection as long as the names are actually common and you use reliable sources Chidgk1 (talk) 16:58, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So as it has been stated previously, there are sources for the common names on the articles, but the only problem is that I do not want to get into an edit war, because it is not my intention to do so. I simply want to improve the page how I see fit. What do you suggest I do? I shall not edit it right now, I'll wait until you and/or a few other wikipedian authorities let me know when its safe. Firekong1 (talk) 13:46, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your question led me to investigate off topic a bit and I was surprised to find our article is not linked to the one on Farsi Wikipedia. So I attempted to merge Wikidata item Q729713 with Q754336 but was unsucessful. If you are skilled with Wikidata perhaps you would like to try. Chidgk1 (talk) 19:01, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

By the way I am not an authority as I very rarely edit biology articles Chidgk1 (talk) 19:04, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alright then. Just to ensure that I do not seem as if I am starting an edit quarrel, am I allowed to add the section once I create a proper list of common names not used on the page header? Firekong1 (talk) 19:22, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am not an admin - I don’t decide what you are allowed to do - I may whinge about Oxford commas etc but I am not very interested in Wikipedia rules so I have only a couple of times made any formal complaint - it would have to be something serious - for example paid editors who claim they are not Chidgk1 (talk) 19:53, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Of course. Thank you for letting me know anyway, I thought I’d ask you since you are a trusted veteran editor on Wikipedia. Firekong1 (talk) 13:06, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! I was just double-checking the citation you deleted in "Air pollution". https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Air_pollution&oldid=1216214272

Although that paper was published in 2007, it's a highly cited paper (>500 citations) and a systematic review of "all studies published between 1950 and 2007" on that subject - so I think it would count as a high quality

. I think we should probably put it back but address whatever the problem was that prompted someone to label it "clarification needed". Just wanted to check what you think and if you see some other problem with it?

Thanks! 45154james (talk) 12:06, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for asking. You probably know better than me so I won’t object if you revert my change.

I don’t understand the info in brackets - perhaps that is why it was tagged “clarification needed”. I thought that nowadays we understood that PM1 is rather dangerous but perhaps that is only for the brain rather than cardiovascular? The info in brackets seems to be saying that the total weight of particles determines the danger - but probably I misunderstood.

Also it only says correlation - I wonder whether anyone has proved causation by now. Chidgk1 (talk) 15:17, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your thoughts! I didn't want to just revert because there is clearly a problem with it and it does need improving. I'll see if I can rewrite and summarize the latest research with whatever the latest

WP:MEDRS might be. 45154james (talk) 08:47, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply

]