User talk:Daß Wölf

Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3

This page has archives. Sections older than 180 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 15 sections are present.

The article 2020 Zagreb flash flood you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:2020 Zagreb flash flood for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Governor Sheng -- Governor Sheng (talk) 16:21, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:4th-century establishments in Croatia has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Laurel Lodged (talk) 16:58, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

You can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply ]

Hey, I just saw your question at the Village Pump about Oct 2019 spike in readership and wanted to give you some info regarding it. I'm an Analyst working in the Product Analytics team and the drop in October readership was one of the things we noticed this month. Since the discussion has been archived, I was told to reach out to you via Talk pages.

In 2019 Sep and Oct there was suspected bot activity that was reported as user pageviews with 'None' referrer. More details and investigation here : https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T239811#5713328

Hope this was helpful! and if you feel it would be useful for others pls feel free to unarchive the thread and provide this info.

--MKampurath (WMF) (talk) 17:59, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@MKampurath (WMF): Thanks for the info, it's an interesting insight. I've restored the discussion at the VP. I'm glad that you folks on the WMF side are keeping tabs on pageview data I do wonder what's the purpose of this kind of bot traffic... Daß Wölf 18:27, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

]

DYK for Pero Pirker

 — Amakuru (talk) 12:03, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 — Amakuru (talk) 12:03, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article

]

The article

]

The article 1964 Zagreb flood you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:1964 Zagreb flood for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mujinga -- Mujinga (talk) 10:21, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations | June 2022 Backlog Drive

On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number and age of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? Sign up here !

You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives. Click here to opt out of any future messages. (t · c) buidhe 04:26, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear project member, This message is being sent out to encourage new ideas and feedback on those proposed in regard to the colors debate for WikiProject Weather. For those who are unaware of what's been happening over the last year, I will give a brief summary. We have been discussing proposed changes to the colors of the dots on tropical cyclone maps and templates and infoboxes across the entire weather project in order to solve issues related to the limited contrast between colors for both normal vision as well as the various types of color blindness (

). We had partially implemented a proposal earlier this year, however, it was objected to by a number of people and additional issues were presented that made it evident this wasn't the optimal solution. We tried to come up with other solutions to address the issues related to color contrast, however, none of them gained traction and no consensus was generated.

We need your help and I encourage you to propose your own scale and give feedback on those already listed. Keep in mind that we are NOT making a decision on any individual proposal at this time. We are simply allowing people to make proposals and cultivate them given feedback from other project members. Please visit our project page for additional details. The proposal phase will close no later than December 31st at 23:59 UTC. Noah^Talk 02:36, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]