User talk:Dissoxciate

Hi Dissoxciate! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like ChamithN (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi Dissoxciate! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, help: notes, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread. See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both talk) 19:03, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply ]

Umngot River, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Rusalkii (talk) 23:51, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

thankyou! much obliged. Dissoxciate (talk) 00:08, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dissoxciate,

I have made a edit in Rahul Pandita & Vivek Agnihotri page about his self idenfication of his caste. There seems to be seem to be some confusion from my side regarding the same. Since the person has self identified himself which is in accordance to Wikipedia BLP Policy

Please refer the link mentioned for the same and it is not Original research

Could you please provide the reason for removing the same.

Thanks, Pranesh Ravikumar Pranesh Ravikumar (talk) 12:42, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Even if a person has identified himself as belonging to a certain caste, you're not supposed to insert castes of people into Wikipedia unless

With self-identification like that, it's highly likely that admins will see your reverts unfavorably. My suggestion would be to drop this. Hemantha (talk) 02:17, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I see your point. This topic is a huge mess, either way. Dissoxciate (talk) 03:12, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dissoxciate,

I have currently removed my two edits about self identification of their caste for further clarification. Based on your recent conversation with Hemanata i think we could proceed to add the same since it is self identified by the person itself.

Thanks Pranesh Ravikumar (talk) 07:36, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FYI: Wikipedia talk:Noticeboard for India-related topics/Archive 49#Mentioning caste of Individuals — DaxServer (t · m · c) 11:12, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about

page-specific restrictions

, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the

guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here

. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

— DaxServer (t · m · c) 20:52, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wei Sawdong Falls, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

RPSkokie (talk) 06:12, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for informing! Dissoxciate (talk) 06:18, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Dissoxciate: Thank you for your contributions to veganism – or vegetarianism – related articles. I'd like to invite you to join WikiProject Veganism and Vegetarianism, a WikiProject to improve veganism and vegetarianism articles on Wikipedia and coverage of these topics. If you would like to participate or join, please visit the project page for more information. Thanks! Rasnaboy (talk) 04:15, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

this seems interesting, just joined! thanks for the invite. Dissoxciate (talk) 14:00, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for the info! cheers.Dissoxciate (talk) 05:27, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Changey Falls, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 00:28, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kagyu Thekchen Ling Monastery, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Gusfriend (talk) 07:15, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Hope you’re interested in contributing to Animal rights–related articles in Wikipedia. If so, I would like to invite you to add your name under the “Participants” section in Wikipedia:WikiProject Animal rights. Cheers. Bhagya sri113 (talk) 08:20, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

yes, i'm interested to contribute. i'll join. thanks for the invite! Dissoxciate (talk) 09:11, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at

Draft:Singshore Bridge, Pelling. Thanks! Gusfriend (talk) 02:04, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Hi @Gusfriend:, I checked your comment! So as far as I could find, to answer your first question; it appears that the bridge is primarily for pedestrians. However, light vehicles can cross the bridge as well. This reference^[1] discusses it, and a number of tourist reviews elsewhere state the same. For the second question, although there isn't any forthright statement addressing the question, from most references provided it can be made out that the bridge was constructed with the exact purpose of reducing the time and distance between the two gorges (and connecting those two hills), which implies there wasn't any lower bridge prior to its construction. I couldn't find any numbers for the third question, unfortunately. Although all references are consistent on the claim that the bridge attracts significant footfall, none provide any numbers.

There's also one discrepancy that has come to my attention, so I'd request you to review that. The reference(s) I've used in the article mention that the bridge was built 'in the early 2000s', but the aforementioned reference states that it was inaugurated in 1993. I'm not sure which to go by. Please address this. Thanks! Dissoxciate (talk) 08:22, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dissoxciate! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Shortdesc helper, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread. See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both talk) 19:03, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply ]

Hi Dissoxciate! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Articles for submission, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread. See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both talk) 19:02, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply ]

Hi Dissoxciate! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Categories, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread. See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both talk) 19:02, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply ]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at

Draft:Singshore Bridge, Pelling. Thanks! Dwaipayan (talk) 00:30, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Singshore Bridge, Pelling, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Dwaipayan (talk) 19:49, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DGG were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject

peacock terms

that promote the subject.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Promotional -- too much content about what they hope to do in the future. Not notable because the sources are not reliable for notability -- ee WP:NCORP -- interviews where the founder or the company are allowed to say whateverthey please about themselves are not reliable sources, but essentialy press releases.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:JetSetGo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 06:47, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

fair enough. thanks for the response! Dissoxciate (talk) 12:00, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Authors with experience in creating articles may choose to not go through AfC, which has a backlog of drafts waiting for review. Risk for creating directly is that a person at new pages patrol may Speedy delete or start an AfD rather than just revert the article to draft if in their opinion not good enough to be accepted. David notMD (talk) 12:40, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for this, David notMD. So far, I've only created articles using AfC (except i believe 3 on certain species). Since the procedure is fairly time-consuming (and since I've gained a certain level of experience on here), I decided to create an article directly (ofcourse, not before assessing its notability). But the risk, as you said, always remains. Which is why I wanted it to get reviewed, and hence, my inquiries.

Should I just leave the article as it is for now, then? Dissoxciate (talk) 12:46, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am not an AfC reviewer nor a NPP participant. David notMD (talk) 13:26, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

fair enough. Dissoxciate (talk) 15:11, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

Hello, Dissoxciate. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:56, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Santhal Family, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:33, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

thanks! Dissoxciate (talk) 15:59, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Abraxas irrorata, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]