User talk:ExcellentWheatFarmer

Hi ExcellentWheatFarmer! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing!

Hi there. For reference, please don't change the dates inside maintenance templates unless you are making a change that resolves the issue in the template. For instance you've changed the dates in Notability templates on a couple of articles now to read September 2020. Changing these dates means it looks like it's only just been tagged, instead of has been sitting untagged for over 6 months which would mean a different set of actions may happen. Thanks. Canterbury Tail talk 15:12, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Got it! I’ll make sure to keep that in mind. ExcellentWheatFarmer (talk) 15:17, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Meanwhile, if you have more reviews from Dragon or other sources, there are plenty that need to be added here and there. :) Lots, in fact! BOZ (talk) 15:44, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject

independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid

when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails the requirements of

WP:NBOOK

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Guildbook: Haunters and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Guildbook: Haunters, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 06:52, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ExcellentWheatFarmer! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 06:52, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

RPG articles

It can be tough as a new editor figuring things out. I say, if you want to work on RPG articles there are plenty of already existing articles which could use your help. If you have access to Dragon, that is great, there are many articles here which were reviewed in that magazine which could use that review added. If you have access to Arcane that is cool too - I have already added reviews to everything up through issue #9, so everything after that still needs to be gone through. I have already gone through

Or, if you want to dig in but are not sure where to start, I would be happy to give you suggestions. :) BOZ (talk) 01:18, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Olaf Kosinsky was:

This submission appears to

independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability

of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This is a very selective translation of the German article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
  Draft:Julian Reichelt
  and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to
  Draft:Julian Reichelt, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7
  }}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 19:19, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rein Aidma, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Estonian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:20, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add sidebar templates to article without checking out how they affect the article's layout. When there's no room for the sidebar to fit, use navboxes instead. Thanks. Beyond My Ken (talk) 05:53, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I moved a couple of them, but it's not my job to see that a sidebar fits in the article, that's your job. If there's no room in the article to the Mussolini sidebar, don't force it in, use the Mussolini navbox. Beyond My Ken (talk) 06:05, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also, check whether there’s already a navbox. You added it to Death of Benito Mussolini which had the Mussolini navbox already. DeCausa (talk) 06:28, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, I am so sorry that you had to go and fix my cock-ups like that. I’ll keep that in mind in future, and again - so sorry to both of you. ExcellentWheatFarmer (talk) 06:53, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Something to think about if you’re a relatively new editor: avoid making “mass” changes to multiple articles. Try things out gradually. If it’s not quite right you’ll see from initial reaction early on - no harm no foul. If you do a lot of the same thing that’s not quite right it can be a little disruptive. Thanks. DeCausa (talk) 07:06, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your support and trust. Please call on me if you need help, or if you see me fail. BusterD (talk) 18:38, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Heinrich Lades, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Christian Social Union.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

HI @

Understood! I'll have another once-over of the article to see if there's anything of significance I could suggest. – ExcellentWheatFarmer (talk) 17:04, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article

criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kavyansh.Singh -- Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 11:41, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply

Thank you! – ExcellentWheatFarmer (talk) 15:51, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article

The article Jimmy Carter you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Jimmy Carter for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kavyansh.Singh -- Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 07:41, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Its been a pleasure working with you! – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 07:45, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! You too.– ExcellentWheatFarmer (talk) 13:55, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On 1 October 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Jimmy Carter, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Jimmy Carter claims to have seen a UFO? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Jimmy Carter. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Jimmy Carter), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This hook got 38,661 views (1,611 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of October 2021—keep up the great work! theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 03:12, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 43,399.5 views (1,808.3 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of October 2021 – nice work!

theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 19:56, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article

criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Olivaw-Daneel -- Olivaw-Daneel (talk) 03:21, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply

The article

Why? It is a link to the list of Marvel characters with

@

SassyGamer483 Well firstly, the page for MCU Mysterio is currently a draft. Secondly, it's not common practice to have the link to the MCU equivalent in the lede, especially in the place you put it. Hope that's a satisfactory enough explanation! ExcellentWheatFarmer (talk) 15:02, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

A C-class article is clearly not a draft. And that extra info about Mysterio can't emptied out of the list and added to the article unless there is some reasonable room where it can fit. Readers should have direct access to have all relevant information

talk) 15:09, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

You linked it to MCU Mysterio's page, which is currently a draft. The current link takes you to his section on the MCU character list, which contains almost the exact same information in the Film section of the article, so the link is unnecessary. Also, no other Marvel character page does this. ExcellentWheatFarmer (talk) 15:13, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies, I had not seen the

talk) 15:52, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

No problem! ExcellentWheatFarmer (talk) 16:17, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article The Crimson Horror you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Crimson Horror for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Olivaw-Daneel -- Olivaw-Daneel (talk) 00:01, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2022!

Hello ExcellentWheatFarmer, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2022. Happy editing, – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 09:06, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply] Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

@Kavyansh.Singh Thanks dude! Same to you. ExcellentWheatFarmer (talk) 16:36, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for adding The Web Planet to the list of Good Articles. I became super busy. I did see that the bot didn't add the GA icon or notify the nominator of the article passing. I'm not sure why. SL93 (talk) 01:00, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh it's totally fine dude. If it wasn't me someone else would have added it eventually, I'm just really quick on the draw with these things. ExcellentWheatFarmer (talk) 01:02, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at

]

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at

]

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at

]

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at

]

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at

]

A barnstar for you!

		The Invisible Barnstar
		For reviewing at least 3 points worth of articles during the January 2022 GAN Backlog Drive, I hereby present you with this barnstar in my capacity as coordinator. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 03:43, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply ]

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at

]

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are opening in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 1 September). A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:51, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at

]

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at

Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election opens in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 15 September) and will last through 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:26, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just a quick correction to the prior message about the 2022 MILHIST coordinator election! I (Hog Farm) didn't proofread the message well enough and left out a link to the election page itself in this message. The voting will occur here; sorry about the need for a second message and the inadvertent omission from the prior one. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:41, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election closes soon, at 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. The voting itself is occurring here If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:13, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at

]

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at

]

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at

]

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at

]

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at

]

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at

]

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at

]

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at

]

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at

]

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at

]

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:05, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at

]

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at

]

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at

Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023! The the top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki . Cast your votes vote here and here respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2023. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. Hawkeye7 (talk · contribs) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:56, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at

]

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at

]

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at