User talk:Explodicator7331

Hi Explodicator7331! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Name Omitted (talk) 06:09, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

TheDoctorWho is the one who is edit warring. He wants consensus, but he reverted another editor who already agreed with me. That's 2 to 1 against TheDoctorWho's preferred edits. 136.49.32.166 (talk) 15:36, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I see that now.

Also, TIL they rebooted Magnum P.I. Explodicator7331 (talk) 15:41, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also, another editor chimed in, he agrees that discussing potential crossovers is WP Crystal Ball. :) 136.49.32.166 (talk) 15:42, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Would you consider reverting your revert given the circumstances? I opened a discussion on the Talk Page explicitly per TheDoctorWho's request (and I didn't want an edit war either). Thank you! 136.49.32.166 (talk) 15:54, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, sure thing. I'll go un-revert my revert.

Also, have you tried reporting them to Administrators? Explodicator7331 (talk) 15:57, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I appreciate it! I'm using an IP address, not sure if I'm able to report anyone, lol.136.49.32.166 (talk) 16:10, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

When 1) an editor removes something because they believe it violates

WP:STATUSQUO remain in the article while discussion took place until a consensus is reached. NOT continuously reverted to their preferred version. Wikipedia does not use voting so 2-to-1 means nothing. The editor that reverted their initial revert did so on a potential false positive. TheDoctorWho (talk) 16:35, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

I mean, the paragraph you made was based on rumors. If we allowed rumors in Wikipedia, then it would be twice as big. Explodicator7331 (talk) 17:04, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Wikipedia does not use voting so 2-to-1 means nothing." So how is consensus reached? Is it a warm, cuddly feeling?136.49.32.166 (talk) 21:51, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

why did you revert, please see MEDMOS--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 15:48, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Crap! Sorry about that, I just thought it was a random page blanking. Explodicator7331 (talk) 15:50, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

it happens :-) Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 15:51, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Explodicator7331. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by David Biddulph (talk) 16:10, 14 December 2021 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Hi Explodicator7331! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, How do I delete a drafted article I know nothing about?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread. See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both talk) 19:03, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply ]

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
  

—Femke 🐦 (talk) 16:38, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]