Dear Ghirlandajo,
Thank you for your modifications, but please be informed that you are biased against the real people of Sochi and Circassia and i can't believe a real editor and researcher in Wikipedia can remove the truth not because he is not convinced but because the easiest way to him is to remove instead of search for resources , and i can't understand that you removed my contribution by giving a weak reason!!!
What do you mean UNPO.org is not reliable source ????
Please be informed that UNPO stand for Unrepresented Nations and Peoples Organization not a shop for doing propogandas.
Best Regards,
ShapsougSochi1864
Portrait of Anna Yekaterina Countess Bestuzheva-Ryumina (1693-1761)
Dear Ghirlandajo,
With respect to a biographical study concerning the celebrated adventurer Friedrich Freiherr von der Trenck I am looking for a portrait of Countess Bestuzheva-Ryumina, the wife of chancellor A. P. Bestuzhev-Riumin. Unfortunately, though a German lady, it seems that there is no portrait of her known in Germany. Can you help?
I am looking to hear from you. If possible, can you send me your answer as eMail to
[email protected] ?
Yours sincerely,
Andreas Pechtl,
7 December 2009
Project Ukraine
гуд найт! I saw you wrote some excellent new article about Ukraine! Thanks for that! Would you like to join our project Ukraine (click on advert to learn more). We could really need some new articles about the subjects you wrote your last Ukrainian articles about (there are lots of castles there!)! —
I noticed you removed Dierkow and Bardy from the emporia template. I think they should be re-added. *About Dierkow, there is not much known yet, but this does not automatically make it unimportant or tiny (though there is a possiblity).
Bardy-Swielubie in turn is well researched and was not that tiny.
If you are concerned that each archaeological side at the coast will be added, don't be, there are no more known sites at the present.
It does not hurt to leave them in.
"No evidence of non-Slavic presence": This was only true for the early, Carolingian stage of Bardy, as outlined in the next paragraph of the article, the Scandinavians moved in only in the 9th century. I rephrased the article to make that more clear.
If you still think it is a bad idea to put them back in, let me know. Regards Skäpperöd (talk) 11:55, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Feel free to readd them! By the way, I don't think we should limit the template's scope to the Baltic Sea as you did. --Ghirla-трёп- 11:59, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I didn't know that the Cossacks liked raspberries :) More Lviv substubs will be added as soon as I have free time in the Russian Wikipedia. Best, Ghirla-трёп- 21:47, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Question about image
Hi there. I'm doing some work on tagging featured pictures on the English Wikipedia. Coming across this image, I found that you added a {{NoCommons}} tag. This was back in 2006, and the current preference is to put everything on Commons. Do you have a problem with me asking for this image to be deleted from WP or do you still have a pressing reason? Thanks! ~ ωαdεstεr16♣kiss mei'm Irish♣ 04:49, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I'd prefer to keep the local image. Shouldn't we respect each others contributions and attribute them properly. Last year I found it on Main Page of the Wikimedia Commons without any information as to who uploaded and nominated the picture. That was rather disheartening. --Ghirla-трёп- 10:29, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Very true. I asked you first b/c I respect the intentions of photographers/image uploaders. That said, this image is actually in the public domain (and especially since it's not your work), you really have no say over what happens to it after you upload it. I'm going to have the local copy deleted, but once that occurs, everything will be the same once I reenter the missing data (if you're not aware, Commons images are called to a local Wikipedia and local wikipedia templates can still be added, such as the FP and POTD templates). Sorry for any confusion, but PD images are not needed on Wikipedia; they belong on Commons so every language Wikipedia can access them. Thanks for understanding. ~ ωαdεstεr16♣TC♣ 21:30, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
FWIW, I credited you as the original uploader and included much of the info from the local copy to the Commons copy (the caption of the local copy was more complete). Hopefully this doesn't leave a bad taste in your mouth, but it's the right thing to do. ~ ωαdεstεr16♣TC♣ 21:42, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Interesting move. Do you have a link to attest the German version of his name? I can't seem to find one. Neddyseagoon - talk 10:34, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
On T:TDYK]] you said there was little information in English. That doesn't really matter. Are their other-language sources to use? - Mgm|(talk) 12:17, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Baikoff
Hi, Ghirla! When you get a moment, could you check if
Hi, me again. I've got another question for you, if you don't mind. In the Vorotynsk article, there is a mention of the village of Spas-on-the-Oka. I was unable to find anything about this village. I also did not quite understand the "which now marks the spot" part—currently, the village (selo) of Vorotynsk is located on the location of the ancient town, and there is a larger (and newer) settlement (posyolok) of Vorotynsk not too far away from it. There is (and, to the best of my knowledge, was) no populated place called "Спас-на-Оке" anywhere in the vicinity. Could you, please, clarify? Where exactly is Savior Vorotynsk Monastery located, do you know? Same goes for New and Old Vorotynsk villages—are these in reference to the selo and posyolok? Thanks again!—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 15:34, March 6, 2009 (UTC)
Check map coords here [1]. Spas is referenced on many similar tourist sites, it has postcode 248903 and appears to be administered by the city of Kaluga [2][3] although nearby Vorotynsk is in Babyninsky rayon.
Thanks, NVO, it helps, although this still does not resolve everything. In addition to Spas in jurisdiction of Kaluga, there is also another Spas in Babyninsky District; both are listed simply as "Spas", not "Spas-na-Oke" (which is why I ignored them when posting the original note) and none of the two is located on the spot where ancient Vorotynsk stood (the selo of Vorotynsk is in that spot now). Any further ideas?—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 18:49, March 6, 2009 (UTC)
Here's the almighty KLADR [4], see fifth line from the bottom of list. It is деревня Спас, Спасский сельский округ города Калуги. "Na Oke" is omitted in all official data; it is actually inside Oka-Ugra salient. Kaluga police has a vacancy for a local cop [5] - wanna apply?
Ah yeah, here's the dream job I always wanted, thanks so much :) Regarding Spas, any clues as to when the "-na-Oke" suffix is/was used? Or is it more of a colloquial name that never made it to the official records?
Anyway, based on this discussion, is everyone going to be OK with me butchering Vorotynsk a bit? The monastery sentence should be moved to Rosva (based on the coordinates); "Spas-na-Oke" does not seem to do anything with Vorotynsk except being located fairly close (but definitely not on the spot of old Vorotynsk the town), so its mention can be removed; also removed should be the mentions of New and Old Vorotynsk (which are not officially called that). Sounds good so far? Thanks!—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 20:09, March 6, 2009 (UTC)
By the way, my 1859 book on inhabited localities of Peremyshlsky Uyezd of Kaluga Governorate lists the selo of Spas (near the Ugra and Oka Rivers) as "Spas or Spasskoye", so the "-na-Oke" designation must be relatively recent.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 20:14, March 6, 2009 (UTC)
Thank you, my friend, but I still spend most of my time in Russian Wikipedia. My contributions in English are limited to fixing some pesky errors, and I would start an occasional sub-stub every once in a while. --Ghirla-трёп- 22:26, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there, Andrei! Thanx for fixing the picture of the Order of Glory on my user page! Some dude erased a while back claiming it to be a copyvio or something like that :). How are you these days? Will you ever return to serious editing in English Wikipedia? Drop me a line. KNewman (talk) 08:18, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Beregovaya compressor station
Hi, Ghirla. Could you help with the exact location of the Beregovaya compressor station? Some sources says that it is located in Arkhipo-Osipovka, and most of the sources says that at Dzhubga, e.g. this map of gas pipelines. By my understanding it is located in west from Dzhubga and in east from Arkhipo-Osipovka, and definitely there is only one compressor station, not two. Do you knew any reliable source about the location? Beagel (talk) 07:19, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The map is in error. The Beregovaya (literally, "coastal") station, launched in November 2005 as part of the Blue Stream network, is situated in the Drovyanaya Shchel' gorge near Arkhipo-Osipovka, Gelendzhik District at an elevation of 235 meters.[6][7][8] Some pictures are available here. I suspect there will be another compressor station built in Dzhubga as part of the South Stream project. --Ghirla-трёп- 10:36, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. It should be the same compressor station (probably expanded) for the South Stream. There is only one incoming pipeline, and it is not logical that the compressor station for the South Stream would be located east from the Blue Stream pipeline. Beagel (talk) 12:51, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Easter Greetings
Христос воскрес! Хрыстос уваскрос! Alleluia, Christ is risen! Kristus is uppeston!--Paul Pieniezny (talk) 09:09, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, Ghirla! I almost started to move Avdotia Istomina to "Yevdokiya" when I noticed that it was you who created the article originally (and you normally know what you are doing :)). Could you, please, clarify, why the title says "Avdotia" when her actual name is "Евдокия"? I do not immediately see it. Thanks!—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 13:48, April 23, 2009 (UTC)
Привет, я тут случайно написала статью в англовики (со мной такое первый раз, обычно токо правлю). Сделай пожалуйста одолжение, посмотри грамматику, а то у меня с ней всегда оч. плохо было 0_0 --Shakko (talk) 15:14, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Good image of the church, Andrej. It's a pleasure to see your name at English Wikipedia.--Wetman (talk) 12:14, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, my friend. I'm pleased to see your name too. Can you help me in identifying this image? --Ghirla-трёп- 19:31, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Would it be the spiral staircase scala a chiocciola in a wing of
Jacopo Barozzi da Vignola
?
I was tempted to use it for illustrating the Vignola article, but, since the attribution to him is by no means certain, should we let it rest on commons in relative obsurity? --Ghirla-трёп- 08:59, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Your inputs to the Shamordino Convent and other articles
Hey Andrei,
I've noticed you've been editing some of the Wikipedia articles I earlier uploaded images to. Many of the images have been deleted for no apparent reason. I will upload them again. If you don't like some images you can always move them to a gallery.
Please, move Shamordino Monastery to Shamordino Convent (I tried but couldn't do this). This is a community of nuns.
Denghu (talk)
Only a sysop can move this article. You'd better upload your pictures to Wikimedia Commons, so that any wikipedia could use them when needed. --Ghirla-трёп- 08:53, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
OK. Could you please contact a sysop on that? (I actually don't know who that is :-)) Denghu (talk)
Hey there!
Nice to see you, Ghirla! Bishonen | talk 07:51, 3 May 2009 (UTC).[reply]
Thank you, Bish. It's great to know that you are still around! --Ghirla-трёп- 08:58, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Ghirlando. As regards, Philippa of Hainault, I believe that Kuthen of the Kumens's wife was of the Galitzine family. Halicz is just another version of her name as is Galicie. Her first name is a mystery.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 17:53, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
There's some mistake on the part of amateur researchers cited in the article. There is no record of Kotyan's wife, but a medieval Russian chronicle names several of his sons-in-law, including
Battle of Kalka in which they both took part). In other words, it's Kotyan's daughter rather than wife who may be described as "N of Galicia". --Ghirla-трёп- 18:44, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply
]
I believe you may be right, however his wife was most likely of the Halych family as well. Until that can be proved, I'll remove the reference to Kuthen's wife from the Philippa of Hainault article.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 05:53, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Mission accomplished. It now reads that Elizabeth was the daughter of Kuthen only, no mention of her mother. Thank you for drawing my attention to this error (which was made by me). Hopefully we'll discover who mothered Kuthen's children.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 06:00, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I'm puzzled by this [9]. Are you under the impression that I'm active on IRC? William M. Connolley (talk) 11:10, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I'm under impression that your integrity as a sysop has been steadily eroding for about three years. Why you behave the way you do is not for me to say. --Ghirla-трёп- 10:57, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I disagree with your first assertion, of course. But you have not answered my question. You appear to be associating me with IRC, and in this you are incorrect. If you don't care about being wrong, then say so and I won't trouble you any further. If you do care about being wrong (and I would rather hope you did) I'm interested in what you meant William M. Connolley (talk) 12:04, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ghirlandajo merely mentioned this editor as an example of the atmosphere of intimidation, which appears to be demonstrated perfectly well right here. The association with IRC is a red herring.--Wetman (talk) 15:30, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Right on spot, Wetman. --Ghirla-трёп- 15:38, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I'm afraid I'm no wiser about how to interpret your original statement. Whilst clearly demonstrating ill-will towards me, it is otherwise incoherent. However, it is now clear you realise I'm not active on IRC, so some progress has been made William M. Connolley (talk) 18:13, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
On May 26, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Gonzaga Cameo, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
Hi Ghirlandajo, I'm not overly concerned about this, but I saw your change to
Extreme North (Russia)
, and was wondering if the adjectives are actually particularly useful; they're not exactly quantifiable. Would it not be more useful (and Encyclopedic) to simply detail the aspects which you're attempting to describe via adjectives?
And apologies if this mixes up the formatting you have on this page - I'll try to correct it if that happens. Random name (talk) 16:21, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
DYK for Gorgoneion
On May 28, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Gorgoneion, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
Andrey, please take a look - you might have better sources on the subject. Most of the article is based on Lanceray's book from 1930s; I don't have specific modern sources but Shvidkovsky provides completely different dates (and frequently different attributions, but it was expected). Regards,
On June 3, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article House of Lorraine, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
Giants27 21:49, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
You have been nominated for membership of the Established Editors Association
The Established editors association will be a kind of union of who have made substantial and enduring contributions to the encyclopedia for a period of time (say, two years or more). The proposed articles of association are here - suggestions welcome.
If you wish to be elected, please notify me here. If you know of someone else who may be eligible, please nominate them here
I am conducting a reassessment as part of the GA sweeps process. I have found come concerns which need addressing if this article is to keep its GA status, which may be found at Talk:Erast Fandorin/GA1. Thanks. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:13, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Askold and Dir
Fringe theory? What are talking about? The whole Russian history is the fringe theory. Why are parimary chronicles lay the base of Russian history? Book of Veles is being denied by the Russian church. Of course, because that church primary mission to destroy our history, the Slavic history. The primary chronicles were written by that church to come up with the new history. Why is that there are no prior historical records exist until those chronicles? Are we to believe that our ancestors were that stupid that they left us no historical records? Or, maybe, were they eliminated? I believe so.
Rus was converted into Christianity. All Slavic religion was eradicated. Why? Because they did not know how to believe? :) What a crack! No wonder that the church now wants to get rid of Book of Veles. Aleksandr Grigoryev (talk) 19:26, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply
I have conducted a review of this article which has a large number of issues which need attention. I have delisted it. The reassessment is at Talk:Canaletto/GA1. Thanks. Jezhotwells (talk) 13:48, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'm Bagratun from the Spanish wikipedia. I ask you to allow me to use the image File:Hutyn.jpg to illustrate the article in Spanish. I think is a really good photograph. Thank's for your response either is positive or negative.
Greetings, Bagratun.
--Bagratun (talk) 00:43, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I'd like to, but the image is not mine. It comes from the website listed on the page. --Ghirla-трёп- 06:59, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Fantastic work
Wow, very nice work on all the articles youve helped create/expand! Omegastar (talk) 09:13, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
You were discussed
Here: [10] I just came to let you know something is going on about your not-loved arbcom:)) Regards, FeelSunny (talk) 23:15, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Notification
Hi Ghirlandajo. I'm posting to let you know that your name has been mentioned on a list of potential candidates for adminship on the talk page for RfA's
here. If you are interested in running, or if you would like to make any comments, feel free to join the discussion. decltype (talk) 20:11, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply
Important! - Round up what few ballet enthusiasts you know on Wikipedia and get them to vote on the proposed merging of the Ondine articles that would see the article about Frederick Ashton's production of the actual ballet, being merged into one about the music.
Greetings, Ghirla! I noted in past edits of the Aleksey Fyodorov page you favor this as the more accepted spelling of his surname, yet the page text uses "Alexei" throughout. Wouldn't consistency be appropriate? (I only know the editing rule regarding AE vs. BE in the English-language WP, that a page remains as initially written in this regard.) I need to know this for the list of key words I maintain for our archives. What do you advise? -- Cheers, Deborahjay (talk) 06:11, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I think Alexei should be changed to Aleksey wherever possible. Best regards. --Ghirla-трёп- 06:23, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Would you say this is a rule or guideline particularly in transliterating from the Ukrainian, or in general from all Cyrillic-alphabet languages? (N.B. none of which I've studied; I'm just at the stage of mastering the letters.) -- Deborahjay (talk) 06:49, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This applies to Russian names. The Ukrainian counterpart to "Aleksey" is "Oleksiy". --Ghirla-трёп- 06:52, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You are now a Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not
autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages
.
When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious
Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here
.
If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 01:36, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge of the
Second Kamchatka Expedition
Hi, Ghirlandajo! I've proposed this merge and then noticed that once you had proposed the same thing. I think you might be interested in the matter, so please watch out for the possible discussion (there have been no replies yet, but may be some will appear). Greyhood (talk) 17:19, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Karl Wenig's painting
Hey mate! Among many interesting pics you've uploaded, is also the picture Last minutes of False Dmitriy I by Karl Wenig (File:Karl_wenig_1879.jpg). Sometime ago, someone else uploaded a better (no offence!) copy of the same file (File:Last_minutes_of_False_Dmitry.jpg) . So, um, I was thinking about deleting 'your' picture, but it requires orphaning, i. e. deleting it from your uploads gallery. I didn't want to be rude and just mess with it, but if you have nothing against, could you please erase this pic from your gallery, so it can be deleted? - ArCgon (talk) 17:55, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I suppose the vanity page should be deleted. It's of no use anymore. --Ghirla-трёп- 14:48, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Dashkov
thanks for moving
Countess Marianne Bernadotte of Wisborg where someone undid my move the same way? maybe it should be Countess Marianne Bernadotte of WisborgPohick2 (talk) 17:53, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply
]
Perhaps
Marianne Lindberg? Anyway, the word "countess" is redundant in the title. --Ghirla-трёп- 05:17, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply
]
Categories for discussion/Log/2010 July 13#Category:New York City Ballet repertory by season
DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
Hi Ghirla, great to see you! Bishonen | talk 20:38, 16 July 2010 (UTC).[reply]
Thank you, dear Bish! I'm also glad to see you again. --Ghirla-трёп- 22:00, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Nice to see you here. Anyway, have you ever heard of this guy? I am already sorry that I asked :-( -- Petri Krohn (talk) 09:35, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
DYK for Smolensky Cemetery
DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
Great work on the List of Baroque residences - it's looking great. I've been trying to fix some of the redlinks in various articles for some of the Italian palaces - Ducal Palace of Modena and Palazzo Estense so far - which happen to link from articles I've been working on as part of my Italian noble families mini-project. Please let me know if there are any other redlinks you would like me to assist with. Regards, Stalwart111 (talk) 07:03, 23 July 2010 (UTC).[reply]
Hey Ghirlandaj. I'm hoping to expand Barge Haulers on the Volga in the next few weeks or so, but sources in English are few and far between; I have some stored up, but would needed help from a VA native speaker to properly do service. It is has been a collaboration with Johnbod, and he suggested you, somebody I've seen about a fair amount on art pages. So I suppose this is a cap in hand request. No worries if you are preoccupied. Best. Ceoil (talk) 22:58, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
That's one painting (and painter) I really hate! But I will add the page to my watchlist. If you need to translate any specific text, let me know. --Ghirla-трёп- 14:25, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Well thank you very much for the translations, they will add great dept and scope to the page. I will start adding, but might need to verify page numbers etc with you at some stage. Pity to hear that you are Repin-phobic but can understand that too! Best. Ceoil (talk) 17:36, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Uts
I do, actually. There are also stanitsas which are even bigger than that (and also without articles). If you think any of those need to be created urgently and you don't have time to do it, by all means let me know—I can write a fairly decent stub (and no, it's not going to be just the dry stats, unless that's all you need). Also, what connection does this have to "novoyaz" you mentioned in the edit summary? I don't understand. Cheers,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); July 27, 2010; 21:10 (UTC)
Lake Peipus
Before I revert you there, could you please read the references [1-3] of this version and explain your changes. No, Britannica is not an authority on hydrology. Yes, Chudsko-Pskovskoe is a possibility, but in any case, this has to be discussed at the talk page first, and again, how about refs [1-3]? Materialscientist (talk) 06:01, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Britannica is an authority on everything. It's up to you to prove that it's not reliable. This is the best known general encyclopaedia reflecting the views of the scientific mainstream. Besides, I don't see a point in following hydrologists on the issue. If anyone, we should consult historians/linguists. --Ghirla-трёп- 06:50, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This is a discussion for the talk page of the article. In short, Peipus is a historical name, which was the major one, but not anymore. By area, the lakes (there are three of them, not one) are more in Russia, but the English literature calls them more by Estonian name (try searching any source, Google Books, Google, whatever, restricting to English language results). Being bold is good, but to a certain extent. Cheers. Materialscientist (talk) 06:56, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Your reply did nothing to address my concerns. From what I can see, the coverage of Russian lakes/rivers in the English segment of Wikipedia is a joke. There are no pages on many major rivers (check the number of interwiki links in
Don River (Russia), with its ridiculously Anglo-centric title. All right, why should I care. --Ghirla-трёп- 07:07, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply
]
Well, that what I was doing these weeks - expanding those articles lake/river/sea articles, but stopped for now, just before Don, and any help is welcome. As to Peipus, there are wikipedia naming policies and conventions, and it seems to me after your reply that this has to be decided at the talk page, and you are welcome to bring your calm thoughts .. Materialscientist (talk) 07:14, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Please note that I've moved your page from "Barge Haulers on the Volga/Temp" to User:Ghirlandajo/Barge Haulers on the Volga. Temp pages should be in user sandbox space, not in article space. Thanks. Bearcat (talk) 02:01, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Defunct towns and former cities
Nope, we definitely don't need to have two of them. Re-organizing the whole defunct/former/abolished/destroyed mess is one of the projects on my to-do list, but if you have an inclination to sort them out, please do so by all means, because I don't have any plans to start working on this any time soon. Help would most certainly be appreciated. Cheers,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); August 10, 2010; 21:01 (UTC)
Hunyad Castle
Hunyad castle is not a gothic revival, it was a precise renovation of an erased Gothic-Renaissance castle. The ruins of the castle in 1865
Editors in Samara?
Hey Ghirla, do you know of any editors in Samara who can help out with photos as required at
I'm chanting as we speak 22:35, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply
I see your point, and personally, I would find that interesting to read. But it would be difficult: the article has a section of "Salons outside of France", where the nations outside of France are given a summary - such as the first salons, the most notable salon-holders and a few words about the importance and characteristics given to the phenomena in each country. There, of course, Russia should be included as well. To give Russia its own section would, therefore, make it necessary to give each nation its own section. France is already treated specially, but that is of course because it is the original country of the phenomena. My suggestion is therefore, that Russia is either included in the "Salons outside of France"-section, or, if it is given its own section, that each nation mentioned in the "Salons outside of France"-section is given its own chapter under this title, where Russia, of course, is one. Individual Salon-holders al deserve their own articles. Good luck! --Aciram (talk) 12:55, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Not every paragraph in a Wikipedia article needs a boldface title. There is surely room at Salon (gathering) for a more complete discussion of the role of salons in Russia.--Wetman (talk) 17:25, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
List of regional characteristics of European cathedral architecture
Found your comment.
As you have probably observed, this article has recently been calvbed off another article. It originally pertained directly to Western Europe, but no longer does.
I have been working on the other article first, and making headway, but have been interrupted by some more pressing personal matters. I will get around to fixing this present article soon I hope, by including regional characteristics from many other countries in a fuller way. Meanwhile, can you give some thought as to which characteristics and photos should be included for Russia etc? Amandajm (talk) 07:52, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ivan IV
Please revert your edit. I can't see, how 2 non-vague historical evidences may not suffice:
for proof please read russian wiki [12] (section "Отношения с царём") about his favourite Soshial (talk) 15:12, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
On the third day of your silence I will revert your edit. Thx for understanding. Soshial (talk) 06:41, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Belsky
What was your reference on
Shuisky
too.
Will see what I can do on Patrikas, but I do not think I have good sources. Renata (talk) 06:55, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Luigi Premazzi Picture in Tsarskoe selo
Hi Ghirladajo,
I was wondering how you obtained the following image:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Premazzi.jpg
used in the article Tsarskoe Selo.
My wife has written a book on Russian history of the period that that painting is from, and she wants to use this reproduction as the picture for the cover of the book. However the publisher requires permission from the photographer. Do you happen to know who that might be?
I would appreciate any information you could provide. I can be also reached at the [email protected]
Thanks.
Alex
I believe the painting was scanned by the Hermitage Museum.[13] Try searching for "Premazzi" on their website. --Ghirla-трёп- 19:36, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I have uploaded a higher resolution version of the image and added a link to the source page. State Hermitage Museum would have even better versions of this, but most likely you would have to pay to get access. -- Petri Krohn (talk) 15:29, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Russia GA reassessment
An article that you have been involved in editing, Russia has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments here . If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. Philipmj24 (talk) 03:14, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Stubs
Please do not use "stub" as an excuse for removing information from an article. Our stubs are under development, and if some information appears "too detailed" for a stub, well, that's just editors expanding the article out of stub status - and that's great! Rklawton (talk) 12:39, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Moving on
Здраствуйте. I've already indicated my desire elsewhere, in a number of venues, to move on from past conflicts. I trust you will see clear the path to same. Let's not re-litigate the past. Best, PЄTЄRS J VЄСRUМВА ►TALK 14:19, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Great job on the Babolovo Palace. It's precisely these kinds of articles that make Wikipedia the excellent source that it is. Had not heard of the palace previously. DYK, maybe? Dr. Dan (talk) 15:37, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Vladimir
Hopefully this should work? I still think that there are way too many pictures of churches for one article, but oh well. Is there nothing else in the city of interest?—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); September 24, 2010; 17:04 (UTC)
Listen, please, do not be judgmental seeing me as some anti-Russian or whatever. I am, certainly, not that. The information about the Vladimir Principality is too vague. There is really no historical development on how it actually appeared and why until Yuri Dolgoruki. There is also no clear mentioning that Andrei Bogolyubsky changed the Vladimir Principality into the Grand Principality. Little or no information is on the conflicts that took place in the Northeastern Rus. The information that I posted is drawn from other articles and mostly based on the Russian version as well. Would it be possible instead of just purging my edits at least let me know that they need to be revised? Aleksandr Grigoryev (talk) 01:04, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
???
A number of moves??? I may recall one or two where I got a distinct impression that you didn't like them, but a "number"? 90% of the moves I did since August were those of soccer players; somehow I don't think that's what you've got a problem with? Care to elaborate? I always appreciate feedback, even from an old grump like you. Cheers,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); October 6, 2010; 14:10 (UTC)
Ghirla, this is not the Russian Wikipedia. To our average reader, an obscure town in Russia is not much different from an obscure village—it's not like we are equating, say, the village of Moskva in Kirov Oblast with the capital of Russia. The naming is in full compliance with
move request
. If you have reasonable concerns, I'll be the last person to ignore them. Why you choose instead to bitch about how everything sucks and only you can save the day is frankly beyond me. No offense, but it's not easy to take your opinion seriously when you start blabbering about a completely unrelated "problem" in a random venue.
At any rate, the four moves you've found (one of which isn't even by me) are a far cry from "we need to run a bot to revert all that". Cut out the panic, will ya? Even the statistics don't corroborate you theory that these moves are somehow "damaging". Chernushka, for example, was moved on August 20. It was getting on average around ten hits a day prior to being moved, and it keeps getting about the same number of hits after being moved. Apparently, the article isn't as hard to find as you would lead us to believe. And Usolye, Usolsky District, Perm Krai is getting more daily hits now than before the move (around 10 vs. ~2-5 before the move). Hmmm...—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); October 7, 2010; 14:33 (UTC)
Those statistics are broken, nobody knows how they count hits. Why not take a cue from the Russian Wikipedia which at least has pages on those villages (in English Wikipedia, they are likely to remain red-linked for the next 15 or 30 years). If it is ru:Верещагино for Russians, I don't see why it should be so complicated for foreigners. --Ghirla-трёп- 15:27, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Not sure where you got the idea that the stats are "broken" and that "nobody knows how they work", but broken or not, they are at least consistent. The numbers themselves may be off, but the trends they show are pretty accurate (DYKs, major re-writes, and moves always show a spike in activity, while forgotten and abandoned articles show a steady small stream of hits over time with no aberrations). Not that it matters. What matters is the guidelines which we (not ru_wiki) have in place. In case you haven't noticed, I am not the one in charge of writing the guidelines; I'm just a poor peasant stuck with having to enforce them (including those where lunacy is apparent). In this case, I don't even have a problem with the applicable guidelines, so why should I be the one to "take a cue" and waste my time trying to think up something better to replace them with? Like I said in the past, if you have a problem with the way things are done, you either find RfC
Please don't do this without discussion. The best name for this article is already under discussion at
Talk:Muhajir_(Caucasus)#Rename_to_Circassian_Genocide. It helps no-one if a number of different editors move it back and forth without agreement beforehand. Andy Dingley (talk) 09:07, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply
I have read that there was a bodyguard or some such institution in medieval Russia that was composed of very tall, young men, carrying an axe. They supposedly wore white, and the appearance of their height was increased by wearing tall hats. One often sees them in operatic and theatrical productions from time to time. Were these the Rynda, or was there also some other group that fits this description? The English article is paltry and the Russian article was not much help. Are you familiar with the subject at all? Thanks. Dr. Dan (talk) 20:33, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I think you are right. I will probably add some details to Rynda. --Ghirla-трёп- 05:54, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Russian painters
I'd like to draw your attention to the thread here, about the editing activities of Leningradartist (talk·contribs). Any comments or advice relating to same would be mush appreciated. --Ohconfucius¡digame! 08:32, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Photos from Russia
hi ghirla, at begin wikilink User:Russavia/Required photos end wikilink i have compiled a long list of photos that i am needing for numerous articles i have under development and future articles i will be working on. Do you know of anyone who can help with any of the photos, especially those i need from russia. If u could put me in touch with anyone, or conversely them with me, i would be most appreciative. Cheers, russavia
Hello, I see that in your revision of the article about Orda Khan there's dates 1204 (birth) and 1280 (+). This data was translated to all the existent articles in others languages, less Russian (and catalan because I'm trying to stablish it). Can you check if is the correct date?; the successor Qun Quran already deceased in 1280 but reigned 1251-1280, while Orda reigned 1226 (in fact not before 1227 and surely from 1229) to 1251. If is not, and must be c. 1251, please correct all the wikipedies that copied the wrong date. Many thanks. --88.19.48.203 (talk) 18:27, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Opinion?
[14] This is something you may know about and have an opinion on.
Hi, I noted that you removed the caption of the image of the estate of Rozhdestveno that indicated that "Nabokov inherited the
Rastelli- designed estate "Rozhestveno" in 1916." The picture had been taken by User:Alexey Lavrov attesting that it was VN's house, and VN describes (p72) that he inherited the house in 1916, upon the death of his uncle Ruka. Can you please explain where you see the problem with the caption that you had to remove it? Ekem (talk) 02:26, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply
]
As you noticed there is now a Rozhdestveno Memorial Estate site in the English WP; it would be helpful if you could include a comment about the building, namely when it was built, who the architect was, and - if this is not known, as claimed in the French WP - to say so (preferably with a reference). Ekem (talk) 15:13, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
You might want to check out Lev Berg, although you may already have it on your watchlist.
I'm not entirely happy with how things are proceeding, although I think they will get sorted out. See User talk:Liveintheforests#Leo S. Berg for some of the background.
I am assuming that Joe will agree with me and make sure some of the material recently removed is restored.
Assuming that happens, I have some question about the material which I believe you added.
You added the sentence:
Among his pioneering monographs on climatology were "Climate and Life" (1922) and "Foundations of Climatology" (1928).
I wonder if "Foundations of Climatology" is a typo. There is such a work, but by someone else. Berg wrote "Principles of climatology", and I'm wondering if you meant to say that.
I don't know who added the list of works, but one is "Principles of climatology" (1926). However, this search suggests it was 1938, not 1926. Do you concur?
Can you identify the source of the translation? I am needing to know that the translation is in the public domain to be able to transfer it to Wikisource, and there is no information available to make the determination. Thanks. — billinghurstsDrewth 00:08, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Proposal
Hi, Ghirlandajo. Please have a look at this proposal “Global blocks and bans.” If you have a long block log in the English Wikipedia, you will be able to be blocked or banned in the Russian and any other Wikipedia as well when this proposal is approved. And vice versa. Take my best wishes. --Psychiatrick (talk) 07:26, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Forte A. An Ancient Chinese Monastery Excavated in Kirgizia // Central Asian Journal, 1994. Volume 38. № 1. Pages 41-57.
Фрагмент издания, упомянутого Вами, необходим мне для завершения популярной книжки, посвященной Суябу. Я гарантирую указание Вашего имени (если Вы того пожелаете) в разделе Acknowledgements.
I know this may be the worst possible place to post an anti-Polish rant, but here I am anyway. Anyone is free to move this discussion to a more appropriate place. My question is this: is it me who is suffering from polofobia, or does Wikipedia have some kind of a pro-Polish bias?
I started off studying the
Deutsches Reich Inc." or whatever. Studying the article Wrocław
I learn that the town has perpetually been Polish from times immemorial.
After some work on File:Wrocław Collage.png I end up reading the article on Lwów. The second sentence of the article tells me that Poles are (or were) main ethnicity of the city. Further down I understand that a terrible wrong was done to Poland in 1991 when Lwów was not returned to Polish sovereignty after the end of the second Soviet occupation.
Что значит, не используется, а ссылки? Arsania — это русское прочтение, ибо в русском нет звука [θ], поэтому либо «с», либо «т». И вы куда-то "y" потеряли, получился греко-латинский суффикс -ia, которого в арабском нет.--Luboslov Yezykin (talk) 16:40, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Главное, какой вариант предпочитают академические источники на английском. --Ghirla-трёп- 17:16, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Arsania не предпочтительнее, вы сами можете убедиться по поиску в ГуглКнигах, там это может быть вообще всё что угодно, включая имя личное и реку в Урарту. И как вы себе представляете, чтобы они арабское слово именно так транслитерировали? У них есть своя система транслитерации, чаще более точная, чем кириллическая, им не нужно для этого обращаться к русскоязычной литературе. В итоге получается, что мы арабское слово транслитерируем через кириллическое посредство, ну не бред? Википедия здесь пока английская. Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Arabic. --Luboslov Yezykin (talk) 09:14, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Colleague, even if this name is a "modern myth", it is part of "Rurikology", so to say. I google books it may be found in the range of ~150 years in several languages. I think this issue deserves explanation in wikipedia, otherwise it continue to pop up thanks to well-meaning, but less educated people. So, can you explain, in Rurik article, how it is "Tatischeff stuff" and all? Lom Konkreta (talk) 17:53, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Ефанда. Ингорь. Имел Рюрик несколько жен, но более всех любил Ефанду, дочерь князя урманского, и когда та родила сына Ингоря, ей обещанный при море град с Ижорою в вено дал.
The page was heavily vandalised at some point after I had lost interest in English Wikipedia. I reinstated a version of the page last edited by me 5 years ago. P.S. Nobody cares about such matters here. Every article on Russia's early history steadily comes to ruin. --Ghirla-трёп- 19:39, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Dasha Sevastopolskaya
I wonder, would you be at all interested in correcting the (no doubt many but inadvertent) mistakes in this new article on an interesting person? I would be very grateful for any comments you might have. -- Ferma (talk) 21:52, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for that. A few questions/comments, if I may:
There seem to be relatively few sources in English that mention her (hmm - thinking about it, there must be something in Helen Rappaport's "No Place for Ladies"; but do let me know if there are other good ones in Russian I should be using) but most of those that do exist seem to prefer
Should the geographical soubriquet really be translated?
Are there records to dismiss the idea that she could have died in Sevastopol in around 1910?
I'm not sure Dasha is the best Russian counterpart to Florence Nightingale (a better comparison might be Mary Seacole perhaps). Ekaterina Bakunina is closer to Nightingale, although no article yet (that might change shortly), but personally, as Florence was more of an organiser than a nurse, I think Grand Duchess Elena Pavlovna is the best fit. No doubt we ought to be reporting what the sources say.
There are clear parallels, but I doubt
ICRC would accept that the Red Cross was "born" in Russia in the form of the Sisters of Mercy! -- Ferma (talk) 21:15, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply
]
Barnstar
Russian Barnstar of National Merit
For obvious reasons. INeverCry 23:54, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Ghidlandajo, could you please let me know why you replaced the photo that I put in the Sennaya Square page?
The photo you put was taken from the Russian version, but it's not a good photo at all, because it's at night, so you can't see anything, and you can't distinguish any recognisable features of Sennaya Square.
Thanks.
Azylber (talk) 10:02, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Because your photo is of inferior quality and does not illustrate the article at all.
WP:NOTREPOSITORY. If you want to upload your personal pictures, you may consider using Flickr or Wikimedia Commons. Wikipedia is not a proper place for storing such stuff. --Ghirla-трёп- 13:17, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply
]
Hi Ghirlandajo, thank you for reply. I understand your point of view, and I am thankful for you opinion, specially because you have a lot of experience, and I'm very new at editing wikipedia articles.
In my opinion, the night photo taken from the Russian article is not good, for the following 4 reasons:
1) it's at night
2) you can't see anything
3) you can't recognise sennaya square in it
4) it contains things that are wrong, such as the column seen at the back, which doesn't exist anymore
Also in my opinion, the photo that I put is better because:
1) it doesn't have any of the problems with the other photo
2) everybody can recognise sennaya ploshchad from this photo
For these reasons, I understand that the photo that I put is not 100% ideal, but I think it's better than the night photo from the Russian article.
But like I said, you are a very important wikipedia editor, so if in your opinion it's better to have that night photo, I trust your opinion.
Hi, Ghirla. Could you please clarify what you meant by this comment? I can probably implement such a parameter fairly easily, and it seems like a good idea to have a Commons link in the infobox, but I thought I'd check with you first as to what it is exactly you were expecting. Cheers,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); January 4, 2012; 17:44 (UTC)
Hi, Ezhiki. A standard link to an eponymous category in the Wikimedia Commons is all I ask for. --Ghirla-трёп- 17:50, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Если Вам несложно, проверьте там, пожалуйста, названия. По Новгороду я надеюсь сделать всё в ближайшие дни, удобнее сразу создавать статьи с подходящим названием. Заранее спасибо.--Ymblanter (talk) 05:15, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Надо будет посмотреть повнимательнее. Сомневаюсь, например, что киевским Золотым воротам место в этом списке. Вы планируете отдельные статьи по монастырским соборам? --Ghirla-трёп- 08:45, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Да, но не в первую очередь. Сначала - отдельные плюс сами монастыри, там, где нет.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:20, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
DYK nomination of VimpelCom Ltd.
Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Zanhe (talk) 05:05, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply
]
DYK for VimpelCom Ltd.
DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
Dammit, Andrey, I spent a long time yesterday fixing all the links to
Tsarevich Dmitry Ivanovich of Russia (born 1582) is more descriptive, and fits with the other various sundry Tsareviches we have around here. Can we please move it back? -- Ynot? 15:48, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply
]
I'm afraid we cannot. His namesakes are just a footnote in genealogical compilations and cannot compete in importance with this key figure of Russian history. Check
WP:TITLE: "Article titles and redirects should anticipate what readers will type as a first guess and balance that with what readers expect to be taken to. Wikipedia does not necessarily use the subject's "official" name as an article title; it prefers to use the name that is most frequently used to refer to the subject in English-language reliable sources". --Ghirla-трёп- 17:57, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply
]
And is that in fact the most frequent name? I have no idea if it is or not... -- Ynot? 18:03, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yaroslavl
A very funny edit summary on Yaroslavl; thanks for cheering me up :) Just out of curiosity, though—is there nothing else to see in your city except for the bloody churches?—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); June 11, 2012; 12:09 (UTC)
Most of other things are unavailable due to the lack of Freedom of Panorama.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:00, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I know. I was just pulling Ghirla's leg :) FOP issues aside, his fascination with quaint little churches is just too tempting of a target not to make fun of.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); June 11, 2012; 13:19 (UTC)
When/if you have time, could you perhaps copyedit the article? It was nominated (not by me) for DYK, and there have been some questions concerning terminology of ecclesiastical architecture I can not answer properly. I also asked Peter I. Vardy. Thanks in advance.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:18, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Ghirlandajo (nice username!), I added the image because it was from a early date and it is in the commons category Lubok. Do you have any idea why it is in that category, and if it should be removed from it? Lotje (talk) 07:15, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Featuring your work on Wikipedia's front page: DYKs
О Михаиле Керулларии. Уважаемый Ghirlandajo - текст мой. Использовал источники по истории христианской Церкви. Священнослужитель. Имею за плечами светское высшее образование, аспирантуру. Пожалуйста, откликнитесь. Предлагаю найти компромисс. С уважением, диакон Олег Котов.
Hello, I was working on disambiguating the links to
Gostiny Dvor when it became clear to me that it really could be a broad concept article. I checked the history and saw your edit where you changed it from an article to a disambiguation page. Rather than reverse your edit, I thought I'd check with you to get an explanation for your edit summary. What do you mean by "back to disambiguation, no need for forking"? Thanks, SchreiberBike (talk) 17:44, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply
I notice that you've added a comment yeserday to the Workshop page of the Infoboxes arbitration case [19]. Per the header at the top of all the Infobox case pages the workshop closed on the 7th. I'm not an arbitration clark so I wont remove your addition myself, but it would be most polite if you would self-revert. The workshop talk page does remain open. Thryduulf (talk) 12:21, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Ternopil castle
You are a complete idiot, changing Krakow to Krakiv and Jan Tarnowski to Yan Tarnovsky. This castle was built by Poland to protect Poland. I do not know why such a chauvinistic moron is still tolerated here. Tymek (talk) 21:55, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Chaosdruid (talk) 01:46, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply
]
Legionnaires' disease question
Can you please explain why you reverted a perfectly proper merger of Legionnaires' disease here? Especially as you've never edited the article, you failed to give any rationale whatsoever in your edit summary. Why did you revert the merger and then go off to Ymblanter and say I've created a content fork? The page was merged, Ymblanter has had to restore my merger. Please explain your 'edits.' Thanks.
Can you please be so kind as to take a look at the above article, which I'm working on. I've found lots of errors in the Soviet era books on the palace, which I think/hope I am correcting - you may known better. I'm using an English book for the section on the owners, but I think it has a lot of death dates wrong because Wikipedia has articles (which you've worked on) on many of Shuvalovs of the same or very similar names, but the death dates don't quite correspond. I'm pretty sure they are the same people, but would like to you to check them out before I link to them from the article. Thanks. Giano(talk) 15:00, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I thought you would be the person to ask. I'll translate it from the Italian. I've just found this man
Illarion Ivanovich Vorontsov-Dashkov. Interestingly, despite his name, he only lived at the Vorontsov Palace because his wife inherited it - would he have owned it himself through her, or could married woman own property in Russia at that time? Giano(talk) 16:37, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply
]
If Vorontsov-Dashkov had divorced his wife, she would have kept the estates inherited through her mother. --Ghirla-трёп- 11:46, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
That's interesting edit [20], the book is very vague as to why that wing vam to named after the Shuvalovs. I wonder if she had separated from her husband - hence she used that as her country seat rather than one of her husband's. It's odd that with so many houses, the Suvalovs (together) would choose to share one with her brother. Giano(talk) 10:19, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I believe she lived separately from her dissolute husband with her children, the young Shuvalovs, from the 1850s onward. --Ghirla-трёп- 10:34, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
That would explain why she and the children spent so much time at the Vorontsov property then - avoiding her husband. Is this the last private owner [21]? Giano(talk) 10:37, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
You recent edits are all v interesting. I wonder how much of a dalliance the Princess had with Pushkin? Apparently she had Hunt (the architect) recreate "The Fountain of Bakhchisaray" in a courtyard at Alupka - an odd thing for a woman who claimed to rebuff him. I shall be writing that courtyard garden up in the grounds section tomorrow - it's all a fascinating subject that keeps leading to other interesting pages. I was thinking a single page on the 19th century palaces and castles of the Crimea would be good to do. I would quite like to do a trip there, probably though it's not currently the best holiday destination. Giano(talk) 20:43, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I bet :) There was probably nothing serious between the Countess and Pushkin, although this is a matter of some debate. He was motivated by vanity rather than a true feeling; and she spurned his advances. Poets were not highly regarded in the Russian aristocratic circles of the time. Pushkin was very young and held no official post, so there was a precipice between them. Some also found him physically repulsive. The Bakhchisaray poem was certainly a bestseller, but it did not become well known until after his departure from Odessa. --Ghirla-трёп- 22:41, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
How good are you on Islamic architecture? the Russian published sources say there are influences of
The Alhambra, but that was erroneous because Moorish and Mughal are quite different. As you know, I will fight any corner on European architecture, but I don't understand the finer points of Islamic and only have a rudimentary understanding of it - are you or DDima (who is the primary author and got the page to GA) any wiser than me? DDima and I discovered a few months ago that the old Soviet sources did contain some errors and wishful thinking. I think it is Mughal, but don't want to discredit a Russian source if you and DDima don't agree. Giano(talk) 19:07, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply
]
Giano, I know nothing about Islamic art. For older writers, "Moorish" was an umbrella term for all Islamic architectural influences, don't you think? This building in Moscow is routinely described as Moorish Revival, for instance, although its models are Portuguese. I don't have any sources on the Crimean palaces at hand. A quick look at the Google Books found four Russian-language sources highlighting the Jama Masjid as the main inspiration for the southern facade. Some authors of guidebooks, unversed in the mysteries of architecture, repeat (in passim) that, apart from the Delhi mosque, Blore was inspired by "the palace of Muhammad I and Carlos I in Alhambra". They probably found this in some old book and so repeat without thinking. Never mind. The Lions' Terrace is not exactly the Court of the Lions. --Ghirla-трёп- 17:51, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
In the 1830s everyone read the Tales of the Alhambra, and Pushkin based The Tale of the Golden Cockerel on one of Irving's stories. Alhambra was probably viewed as a generic term for any luxurious Moslem residence. The line "There is no God but Allah" supposedly appears 9000 times in the Nasrid palace. Perhaps these associations or some details of the interior led to the name "Alhambra" which was applied to the south part of the palace from 1844 onward. Filatova in her catalogue of the Vorontsovs' portrait gallery (Г. Г. Филатова. Портретная галерея Воронцовых. Volume 1. Alupka, 1997) claims that the southern palace of the palace was called Alhambra on account of the inscription. --Ghirla-трёп- 18:06, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Translated from the article Галиченко А.А. Воронцовский дворец в Алупке: новороссийский губернатор и английский архитектор // Пинакотека. - 2004. - № 18/19. - С. 26-31: "Elisabeth Vorontsov was fascinated by the Alhambra tales of Washington Irving and even undertook, in 1838, a journey to Spain to see the famed palace. She brought with her to Alupka the views of Alhambra interiors drawn by an Enlishman named Satu (Сату????) and Blore's design for the garden which was based on the Generalife gardens in Granada. It took several years and a help from soldiers to realize the Irving-influenced design in Alupka". --Ghirla-трёп- 18:22, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Well I see that well known architectural historian Winston Churchill calls it 'Moorish' - who am I to argue with him? I think the article should point out that the architecture is strictly speaking Moghul, but conveniently suited contemporary ideals of Moorish romance. Would you be happy with that? Giano(talk) 18:39, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Good. as you may know, I have not done at FAC for years; I rather fell out with the idea, but I think I would like to see this featured. However, I am not nominating it unless you are completely happy with it. You know this sort of stuff far better than I. Giano(talk) 20:34, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Giano, I don't think I ever took part in the FAC process, and I don't think I ever will, given my poor English and lack of interest in letter-worship and pedantry. --Ghirla-трёп- 22:37, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
March 2014
Hello, I'm Clarinetguy097. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Novorossiysk without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Clarinetguy097 (talk) 00:58, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Kinzelyuk Waterfall
Hi! I'm ChromaNebula(talk) , and I happened to notice the article Kinzelyuk Waterfall as I was patrolling Recent Changes. I understand that you reverted my addition of a [citation needed] tag. I did not mean to confuse or offend you. On the contrary, I was confused by the claim that it was "probably" the highest waterfall in Russia, and thought the source cited referred to the Talnikovy Waterfall (I was mistaken). Another thing I noticed about the article is that most of the links to other geographical features in that area are red links. Could you consider possibly creating those pages (as I can't read the Russian sources)? ChromaNebula(talk) 16:25, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. Normally I'm tempted to write an English geo-stub only when I see a whopping number of interwiki links (e.g.,
Kureika River). I don't think the American public cares about the mountains or rivers of Russia, even if the mountains and rivers are really huge. So it's not worth wasting my time. Especially since the stubs here are quickly disfigured by ugly infoboxes or by User:Ezhiki's nasty activities. --Ghirla-трёп- 18:02, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply
Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! MANdARAX•XAЯAbИAM 00:37, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply
]
Ghirlandajo, it has been eleven days since the above was posted, and no action has been taken at the nomination or on the article. You have been active on Wikipedia in the interim, so please give your attention here as soon as possible. One week is the standard response time; in this case, if there isn't something in the next couple of days, the nomination will likely be marked for closure. Hope to see you posting soon! BlueMoonset (talk) 07:29, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
You will need to do a quid pro quo (QPQ) review of another nomination for your own to be approved. If you need help finding resources for DYK reviewing, there are the
...around again, and indeed to see two people adding to
Steppes art a bit, I don't know if this is an area that interests you? I've said in the past that Middle Ages could do with some additions on Central/East European matters but I don't think we should add that the Bulgarians invented the Renaissance, as they all apparently learn on their mothers' knee. Johnbod (talk) 15:47, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply
]
Nice to see you too, Johnbod. The Boyana claim is ludicrous, yet the wider Orthodox culture was essential for the Middle Ages. This aspect is sorely underrepresented in the article (judging by the illustrations, at least). --Ghirla-трёп- 12:05, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Steppes art is fascinating, but I don't have time for it at the moment. There are too many artifacts that require articles in this language edition of Wikipedia. The Pazyryk carpet immediately springs to mind. --Ghirla-трёп- 12:08, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Ghirlandajo, this is a final call for you to provide the required quid pro quo review of another DYK nomination, a requirement for your own nomination above to be approved. If we don't hear from you in the next couple of days, we will regretfully have to close your nomination as unsuccessful. I hope you will stop by and post at your nomination, which is linked above. Thank you very much. BlueMoonset (talk) 19:00, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
As you may see from my user page, I was the first wikipedian to receive a DYK medal and the 200 DYK medal and, in the words of the then arb YellowMonkey, used to be the "driving force of DYK" from 2005 on. After spending so much time and effort on DYK, I find the latest requirements to review still more DYK nominations unfair and discouraging. If DYK does not care about its patriarchs, you'd better close the nom. --Ghirla-трёп- 16:33, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Is this genuine?
I've just stumbled upon this page:
Princess Natalia Romanovskaya-Iskander. Is it genuine or a hoax? Giano(talk) 20:44, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply
]
Apparently genuine, though the prose is excessively florid. Her stepson Vladimir Dostal is a well-known film director in Russia. Another stepson was the CEO of the Mosfilm studio. Eleonora Nikolaievna Dostal-Oruç certainly lacks notability for a Wikipedia article. --Ghirla-трёп- 07:44, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I think I agree with this. Should we nominate the article for deletion?--Ymblanter (talk) 07:51, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I think we should. --Ghirla-трёп- 09:11, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Good, I will do it later today.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:50, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I was just checking that she existed. I know the Romanovs fell on hard times, but I never knew they had to resort to being trick cyclists - just shows how resourceful good breeding can make one. Icidentally, I just looked at the Stroganoff Palace, "This chain of ownership was preserved until 1919 when the last Count Sergei Stroganov sold his rights to the entail" I would love to know how much his rights were worth at that time. Giano(talk) 19:47, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Bolding
The bold conflicts were more historically important or more successful in the achievement of their goals.Catlemur (talk) 15:28, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Who decides which conflicts are important and which are not? There is no way a rebellion that spread over the territory roughly the size of Western Europe is less important than events in Bulgaria. --Ghirla-трёп- 08:25, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
CPSU Central Committee members
This might seem like a strange question, since its something I should probably do myself, but since I can't speak or understand Russian its a bit difficult. Even so, do you know anyone who would be interested in creating articles on the 28th different Central Committee (a list of their members, similar to
18th Central Committee of the Communist Party of China). I have a list, found it by using Google Translate, but as you may understand, the translation services falters from time to time very seriously, which makes it all but impossible in certain cases to know who is actually who. I'm not saying you should do this, but do you know anyone on Wikipedia interested in making such a list? That we don't have a list on this topic says a lot about WPs covering of Soviet, and Russian history. --TIAYN (talk) 07:45, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply
]
I can make some of the list but would you please create some appropriate redlinks first? I generally do not like creating orphans.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:55, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
DYK for Stripped Classisim?
WP:DYK, and list all the contributors as creators. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 15:04, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply
An article that you have been involved in editing, Majorat, has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. MiguelMadeira (talk) 11:28, 6 February 2015 (UTC) --MiguelMadeira (talk) 11:28, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
An article about Russian monastery
Hello! You thanked me for my article about the katholikon of the Antoniev Monastery in Novgorod, so I checked your page and figured it out that you seem to be a guru of Wikipedia in this field. I have actually just created an article about Desyatinny Monastery, so, it will be a compliment for me if you would find it curious enough to check ;) Take care! --Sterndmitri (talk) 21:29, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
core goal of the project
Thank you, veteran productive editor in English and Russian, for a wealth of quality articles written, substantially revised and edited, often in collaboration, such as Domenico Ghirlandaio and Stripped Classicism, for "being a driving force of DYK, and for adhering to the core goal of the project", - you are an awesome Wikipedian!
Five years ago, you were recipient no. 1142 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:52, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
What do you know
The Petrovo-Solovovo HouseThe Kurakin palace in the 1880s......the same townhouse after a horrible "renovation" undertaken in the late 19th century
I have just returned from your very impressive country with lots of photos, but I see most of the places I've visited have already very good articles already - most of them with your name n the history!. However, one building caught my attention which does not. Maybe because I've had to research the internet to even find out what it is/was. It seems to be a a lesser known Yusupoff Palace on the Nevsky Prospect. Google "Number 86, The 'Actors House' & a former home of Princess Tatiana Vassillievna Yusupova." It's a real neoclassical building with lots of bass relief, and I have photographed it from both angles and will upload tomorrow or later tonight. There seems to be little info available in English at least, but I'll start a page and see of it grows. Giano(talk) 18:52, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oh! I thought I had discovered a building that no one had noticed. Well my efforts now I have looked at them are all lopsided (that's the best) - is there anything much known about it? Perhaps on a Russian language website. Giano(talk) 20:46, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Please upload your photos by any means. It should be known smth about the building, I will try to se whether there are any sources easily available.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:13, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Giano, you chose the worst time of the year to visit the country! In March, the weather must be atrocious. This building caught my attention last year so I decided to upload a vintage photo (to the right) from this website which contains some info about the palace. It was built by Colonel Fyodor Petrovo-Solovovo in the early 1800s (ru:Петрово-Соловово, Григорий Фёдорович was his son). In 1835, Count Władysław Grzegorz Branicki commissioned Gasparo Fossati, a Swiss-born architect, to have it remodeled. --Ghirla-трёп- 22:02, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Now we have a curious connection with Constantinople! By the way, a previous building on the site belonged to Prince Kurakin who had several other Neoclassical palaces in a similar vein. I happened to upload a picture of his Moscow residence last week (see another picture to the right). --Ghirla-трёп- 22:24, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Actually Ghirla, the weather was very good if a little cold - mostly blue skies! I will start a page later today, it can be a stub and we will see what happens. Is it your opinion that it was not a Yousupoff Palace? I'll call the page Nevsky Prospect 86 - it can always be changed. Giano(talk) 09:45, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
When the snow is gone, tons of garbage appear on Russian streets. Sightseeing is best after the week of April subbotniks :) As for the Petrovo-Solovovo House, this page contains more information. In the late 19th century, the building belonged to Princess Tatiana Yusupova, the wife of the last Prince Yusupov and the mother of Princess Zinaida Yusupova. --Ghirla-трёп- 16:08, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I always like to see places before the tourists arrive. I even love Venice best in the winter. Two things struck me hugely about St Pete's - one as the cleanliness of the streets, and the other was the amount of people using the churches for religious purposes; I'm not sure what I was expecting, but it everything was far more impressive than I expected it to be. I expect that was not the real Russia, but it was the nearest I'm likely to get to it. I ate my breakfast every morning staring at the Petrovo-Solovovo House across the street, which is a pretty nice way to start the day, and what made me curious about it. I'll expand the page a little over the next few days. can you keep an eye on it - my Russian translation is decidedly dodgy at the best of times. Giano(talk) 20:24, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
PS: Years ago, when I was a child, I was told a story about another Princess Zinaida Yusupova who died sometime in the 19th century aged 100. After the revolution, when the new owners were knocking her house about, they found a walled up skeleton of one of her lovers - have you ever heard this story, of have I misremembered and confused something else? Giano(talk) 20:28, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The building is listed as both Petrovo-Solovovo House and Zinaida Yusupova House. We can rename the article in one of these names (I do not hold a strong opinion on this).--Ymblanter (talk) 11:46, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Обсуждение в Рувики
Уважаемый коллега, обращаю Ваше внимание на это обсуждение. Возможно, Вам стоит принять в нём участие. --Humanitarian& (talk) 12:35, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Посмотрел. Энтузиасты скайпочатов, как и предсказывалось, уже закрыли все обсуждения происходящего, прикрикивая: "Здесь не место! Обсуждать нечего!" Видимо, осмысленно обсуждать что-либо выходящее за рамки рутины разрешено теперь только офф-вики :( Очистить лог от кляксы было бы шагом к выходу из кризиса, но это сделать можно и без моего участия. --Ghirla-трёп- 19:02, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
P. S. Вы, однако, не совсем правы относительно закрытия темы; похоже, что это было сделано из каких-то иных побуждений: [22]... --Humanitarian& (talk) 21:16, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Пожалуйста, будьте выше мелких личностей, пытающихся пиариться на фоне грандов проекта. Основная масса участников прекрасно понимает, чья роль важнее, и никогда не подаст руки этим геростратам. Просто исключите таких и им подобных из поля своего внимания и продолжайте работать. Плохой участковый - еще не повод менять квартиру. И не забывайте, что вы в ответе за тех, кого приручили. --213.87.138.136 (talk) 04:57, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Кляксы больше нет! Возвращайтесь! Без Вас неуютно в проекте...--DarDar (talk) 11:56, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
TWL Questia check-in
Hello!
You are receiving this message because
The Wikipedia Library has record of you receiving a one-year subscription to Questia
. This is a brief update to remind you about that access:
Make sure that you can still log in to your Questia account; if you are having trouble feel free to get in touch.
When your account expires you can reapply for access at WP:Questia.
Remember, if you find this source useful for your Wikipedia work, make sure to include citations with links on Wikipedia: links to partner resources are one of the few ways we can demonstrate usage and demand for accounts to our partners. The greater the linkage, the greater the likelihood a useful partnership will be renewed.
Write unusual articles using this partner's sources? Did access to this source create new opportunities for you in the Wikipedia community? If you have a unique story to share about your contributions, email us and we can set up an opportunity for you to write a blog post about your work with one of our partner's resources.
Finally, we would greatly appreciate if you filled out this short survey. The survey helps us not only better serve you with facilitating this particular partnership, but also helps us discover what other partnerships and services The Wikipedia Library can offer.
Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Althorv.jpg
Thank you for uploading
image copyright tag
; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:29, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
TWL Questia check-in
Hello!
You are receiving this message because
The Wikipedia Library has record of you receiving a one-year subscription to Questia
. This is a brief update to remind you about that access:
Make sure that you can still log in to your Questia account; if you are having trouble feel free to get in touch.
When your account expires you can reapply for access at WP:Questia.
Remember, if you find this source useful for your Wikipedia work, make sure to include citations with links on Wikipedia: links to partner resources are one of the few ways we can demonstrate usage and demand for accounts to our partners. The greater the linkage, the greater the likelihood a useful partnership will be renewed.
Write unusual articles using this partner's sources? Did access to this source create new opportunities for you in the Wikipedia community? If you have a unique story to share about your contributions, email us and we can set up an opportunity for you to write a blog post about your work with one of our partner's resources.
Finally, we would greatly appreciate if you filled out this short survey. The survey helps us not only better serve you with facilitating this particular partnership, but also helps us discover what other partnerships and services The Wikipedia Library can offer.
Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Kubrat sword.jpg
Thank you for uploading
image copyright tag
; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Josh Milburn (talk) 21:39, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Real Palace
Please move again
Real Palace. If you had read the article, you would have noticed that, in this case, real ≠ royal. The palace name arises from the fact that it was an almunia or real
(from Arabic riyad, garden), not because it was a royal residence.
That's why the name of the palace in Spanish is Palacio del Real and not Palacio Real, or in Valencian Palau del Real instead of Palau Reial.
Hello! Just so I will understand things correctly: Why do you think the "Gallery" heading at Furillen is inappropriate, but not the pictures? Articles describing places usually have a some pictures from the place and most of these pictures have a Gallery heading. Cheers, w.carter-Talk 12:01, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, the title is useless clutter. Please check
WP:Gallery: "If a gallery would only lend itself to a title along the lines of "Gallery" or "Images of [insert article title]", as opposed to a more descriptive title, the gallery should either be revamped or moved to the Commons." --Ghirla-трёп- 16:35, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply
]
Thank you for explaining. w.carter-Talk 16:39, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
English: Coat of arms of the Kievan Rus 10th-11th c.
Русский: Эмблема Киевской Руси 10-11 ст.
Українська: Емблема Київської Русі 10-11 ст.
As you can see in the link, the image that was added as well as its description were all referenced by simply clicking on the image itself. This image is the appropriate image for the article Kievan Rus', was fully referenced, and did not need to be deleted.
In addition, you also made some changes which re-order Russia to appear before Ukraine in multiple places in the article. This would be strange to users, as Kiev is in Ukraine and not Russia. Although Muscovy subsequently renamed itself to Russia in the 18th century in order to adopt the history of Kievan Rus', and Ukraine later renamed itself from Ruthenia to Ukraine, Russia should not appear before Ukraine simply because the current name of Muscovy is similar to Rus', especially given the circumstances of the name change.
I was planning to make an initial stub into this ridiculously missing topic, but then remembered your interests and hereby I offer you the honors to lay the cornerstone. -M.Altenmann >t 20:34, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Rus'ka Pravda
Hi! Ukrainian scientist say so.[23] So, please, remember укр. Руська, рос. Русская. --Бучач-Львів (talk) 07:57, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the message. You might be interested in the article on Petrovskoye-Alabino. There is a rich seam of grand Russian houses still lying in ruins... Theramin (talk) 01:00, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
File:Platov arka.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered,
Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kellyhi! 20:25, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply
Привет. Лучше вместо скрытия доперевёл бы и всё. --Zimin.V.G. (talk) 06:34, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
File permission problem with File:Wisent, Bison bonasus,.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Wisent, Bison bonasus,.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
make a note permitting reuse under the
CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list
) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter
OTRS pending
}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kellyhi! 09:03, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
File source problem with File:Messerer.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Messerer.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.
If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
А зачем переименовали? еще как минимум два человека с таким именем есть, см. ru:Сычёв. -- deerstop (*•̀ᴗ•́*). 10:59, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Велика вероятность, что в ближайшие 100 лет статей на английском о них не появится. Когда появятся, будем думать о внесении уточнения в заголовок. Сейчас это излишне. --Ghirla-трёп- 11:16, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Оптимистично вы в будущее смотрите.) Ну окей. -- deerstop (*•̀ᴗ•́*). 11:27, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
File source problem with File:Pomogi.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Pomogi.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.
If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please refer to the
image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:13, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply
]
File source problem with File:Theatre Square.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Theatre Square.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.
If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please refer to the
image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:15, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply
]
File source problem with File:Saltriot.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Saltriot.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.
If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please refer to the
image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:23, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply
]
File source problem with File:Podkidysh.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Podkidysh.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.
If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please refer to the
image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:11, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply
]
File source problem with File:Taitsy.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Taitsy.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.
If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please refer to the
image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:44, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply
Thank you for uploading File:Osada lavry.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.
If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please refer to the
image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:52, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply
]
Possibly unfree File:Ukposter.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ukposter.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Kellyhi! 02:17, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Possibly unfree File:Musor statue.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Musor statue.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Kellyhi! 15:51, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Trubchevsk.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Kellyhi! 03:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The media file you uploaded as File:Molev.jpg appears to be missing information as to its authorship (and or source),
or if you did provide such information, it is confusing for others trying to make use of the image.
It would be appreciated if you would consider updating the file description page, to make the authorship of the media
clearer.
Although some images may not need author information in obvious cases, (such where an applicable source is provided), authorship information aids users of the image, and helps ensure that appropriate credit is given (a requirement of some licenses).
If you created this media yourself, please consider explicitly including your user name, for which: {{subst:usernameexpand|Ghirlandajo}} will produce an appropriate expansion, or use the {{own}} template.
The media file you uploaded as File:Ivanovsky.jpg appears to be missing information as to its authorship (and or source),
or if you did provide such information, it is confusing for others trying to make use of the image.
It would be appreciated if you would consider updating the file description page, to make the authorship of the media
clearer.
Although some images may not need author information in obvious cases, (such where an applicable source is provided), authorship information aids users of the image, and helps ensure that appropriate credit is given (a requirement of some licenses).
If you created this media yourself, please consider explicitly including your user name, for which: {{subst:usernameexpand|Ghirlandajo}} will produce an appropriate expansion, or use the {{own}} template.
I attempted to create the article, and this is the best I could come up with. (I am afraid it is still better than the Russian article). I remember that Russian history is one of your main interests, so if you could have a look at some point it would be highly appreciated. There is obviously no hurry.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:47, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The article is almost too good as it is (for the English-speaking public, which does not give a damn about such subjects). --Ghirla-трёп- 15:03, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Stefan2 (talk) 23:48, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply
]
Alexander Nevsky, Revision by Vuhdeem as of 08:22, 4 October 2014
Alexander Nevsky,Revision as of 08:22, 4 October 2014 by Vuhdeem - contradicts dates of article: "In 1237, ... He gave his 8-year-old son Aleksandr Yaroslavich to Batu into amanat (hostages). While staying in the Horde from 1238 to 1252,... , wed Batu Khan's daughter, "
Known wikipedia sources give: 1236 - first rule in Novgorod in age of 15, first visit into Orda - 1247 in age of 26, no Khan's doughter as a wife.
Now it found in uk.wikipedia article "Володимир Білінський". It may be timely view of this particular person.
Vuhdeem revision also removed date 1236 of previous author: Ghirlandajo Revision as of 15:02, 10 June 2005, and inserted itself stright among sentence of Ghirlandajo Revision.
Revision 08:22, 4 October 2014 by Vuhdeem should be limited to "OTHER VIES".
I have removed the synopsis, which you state was published in 1927. It is therefore still under copyright. Sorry, — Diannaa (talk) 21:44, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I'm going to revert your edit. The text is taken from the Wikisource page which states that the work is in the public domain. As the text has been available on Wikisource since 2004, I see no reason to delete it from Wikipedia. --Ghirla-трёп- 17:43, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry for not replying sooner. The material was published in 1927, it still could be under copyright. The Wikisource page says the copyright was never renewed, but I don't know how they determined that. — Diannaa (talk) 22:28, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
User:Cryptic has checked the online database here, and discovered the material is PD, so I have restored it. Thanks for your patience, — Diannaa (talk) 01:04, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply
WP:RUS it states that the rule is not applicable to stressed vowels. I can't see anything other than a distinction between words of Russian and non Russian origin. Am I missing something? Thanks. Fenix down (talk) 07:07, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply
]
@
WP:RUS because the placename Кий is an exception to the rule. Apart from Viy, I can't readily think of any other words consisting of the single syllable ending with "-ий". The "Ky" version is completely nonsensical, because it leaves the syllable without vowels. It is impossible to pronounce. --Ghirla-трёп- 18:29, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply
]
I am sure it should be Kiy. May be we can make a footnote in
WP:RUS, I can not right now think of other single-sillable name with "-ий" but tehnically it is possible. Compare Viy which nobody romanizes as Vy.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:34, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply
]
To my mind there is no difference in pronunciation between Kiy and Ky as the y in Ky is being pronounced as a vowel but I understand it might look a bit weird visually so happy for it to stay where it is if everyone agrees. As an aside, what do people make of Kyyy? Fenix down (talk) 19:11, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
It's not so much about stressed/unstressed vowels, as it is about the usual practice of replacing "-iy" with "-y" in adjectives and certain first names ("Valery", "Makary"), but not in nouns or words of non-Russian origin. This is actually mentioned in WP:RUS—scroll all the way down to the bottom of the "Full rules" table, where endings are explained; the third column explains how the "-iy" ending should generally be dealt with. ("Kyyy" is awful but inevitable, since the word being romanized is a direct borrowing from Sakha and looks pretty weird in Russian, too). Cheers,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); April 20, 2016; 15:54 (UTC)
Where does Kiy/Ky come from in this instance then? Fenix down (talk) 16:25, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
There are multiple theories, but most likely the name is either of Finno-Ugric or Saami origins. At any rate, it's a noun now, and the "-iy" ending in nouns would not be reduced to "-y" when romanized.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); April 20, 2016; 16:39 (UTC)
P.S. By the way, similar cases include Fiy in the Republic of Dagestan, Niy and Kiy in the Republic of Ingushetia, and my personal favorite Iy in the Tuva Republic. Of these, Fiy is the largest (with ~1,500 people).—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); April 20, 2016; 17:02 (UTC)
Thanks for the info, very interesting. Fenix down (talk) 17:31, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for uploading File:Mikhailoftver.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.
If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please refer to the
image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:47, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply
]
Glinski Rebellion
Статья совершенно нечитабельная, или ещё куда ни шло? Если первое, то, вероятно, её было бы проще удалить, чем переписывать, а мне не следует заниматься самопереводом с таким уровнем владения языком.
Конечно, имеет. В принципе, всё понятно. --Ghirla-трёп- 15:29, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
ygm Questia
Please do let me know if you have any questions or problems.
Hello, Ghirlandajo. Please check your email; you've got mail! It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{
sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Template:User no IRC during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Primefac (talk) 02:51, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply
claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media
).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Vanjagenije(talk) 12:04, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
ArbCom Elections 2016
: Voting now open!
Hello, Ghirlandajo. Voting in the
2016 Arbitration Committee elections
is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
We are students writing an article on Tiler Peck as part of our class Academic and Discourse writing at Tec de Monterrey. Since you are an experienced Wikipedian and have an interest in these kind of topics, we would like to know if you could take a few moments to take a look at the article and give us feedback. Thank you for your time. --Antonio Pano (talk) 21:17, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Medzhibozh graves.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. --geageaTalk 04:24, 22 April 2017 (UTC) --geageaTalk 04:24, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
WP:BLPPROD based on the last few paragraphs, but I want to point out that even without those paragraphs this is basically a duplicate of Zubov (surname)
, and that page should be moved here.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be
deleted for any of several reasons
.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Thank you for uploading File:Shulzhenko.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.
If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please refer to the
image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:01, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zubov until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Primefac (talk) 18:09, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
A barnstar for you!
The Original Barnstar
thanks for your effort in wikipedia.I'm really impressed by your contribution to know more about Russia.keep going
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
I listed some of the recent winners. --Ghirla-трёп- 16:01, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Replaceable fair use File:Igor Kirillov archive.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Igor Kirillov archive.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:
Go to
Di-replaceable fair use disputed
|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 11:35, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
For the record, there is a 7-day waiting period before this file should be deleted. Writ Keeper⚇♔ 13:41, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
File source problem with File:Geltzer.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Geltzer.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.
If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please refer to the
image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:57, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply
]
Ezra Pound
Did you realize that there's a discussion on the talk. Feel free to join. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:08, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.
Please carefully read this information:
The
infoboxes and to edits adding, deleting, collapsing, or removing verifiable information from infoboxes, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here
.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
Just a formality, as it seems you haven't been notified. –dlthewave☎ 16:20, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your contributions today, even though you mention above a dislike for Repin. It is good to have input from a Russian speaker. I get the impression that the article is depending slightly too much on English sources at the moment, and there must be more that could be added from Russian language sources. 213.205.240.133 (talk) 08:42, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Copyvio - if it's from the 1950s then the author did not die before 1944
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be
deleted for any of several reasons
.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Hello- What edit are you "reverting" with this edit? I went back in the history a bit and don't see a deletion that your edit restores. Erictalk 02:13, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, thanks, I see now. I didn't go that far back. Erictalk 12:51, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Ghirlandajo. Voting in the
2018 Arbitration Committee elections
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:34, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Happiness (1934 film). Since you had some involvement with the Happiness (1934 film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. PC78 (talk) 10:40, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review
Good to see your signature on the ref desk, reminds me to look at the Russian WP articles for sources. I ran across Eugene Pick's name the other day and remembered i was supposed to write an article. Working on it, but you might say i'm a slow writer.
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect
Great Soviet Encylopaedia. Since you had some involvement with the Great Soviet Encylopaedia redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Regards, SONIC678 15:15, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]
Manu Dibango
Если никто не напишет недели за две, то переведу отсюда, хорошо. Просто если сейчас загляну в русскую Википедию, то опять надолго выйду из строя. Да и не планирую я туда полноценно возвращаться без очистки логов. (Я в мае намечал здесь создать страниц 50–100 из старых планов/запасов... Для десятка страниц даже заготовки уже были. Теперь, конечно, так много создать не получится, но хоть что-то.) --Moscow Connection (talk) 08:25, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Help with ambiguous word
Hello, Ghirlandajo! First, не понимаю по-русский (the only Russian sentence I learned as a child.)
I read that you have absented yourself from the English Wikipedia, but I'm hoping you might still answer a question.
, a page that you have modified in the past. The section in question reads:
Bailiff
Story about the bailiff (Sofron) of a landowner friend of the narrator who is more in control of the land than Arkady Penochkin. He uses the peasants and steals their money from loans. This story was an angreement, though not explicit, of a letter written in response to Gogol's Slavophile tendencies. This story is one of the most vivid examples of the peasantry's exploitation.
The word in blue is unclear. The most similar word would be "agreement", but I wondered about "arrangement", or even "adaptation". Can you help clarify this? Thanks. - Jkgree (talk) 22:17, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
make a note permitting reuse under the
CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list
) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter
OTRS pending
}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. LoganTalkContributions 23:29, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Armenia/Azerbaijan discretionary sanctions
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
Orphaned image with non-identical duplicate already at Commons. The Commons image (File:Borovikovsky maria Lopukhina.jpg) is higher resolution, and has better contrast and documentation.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be
deleted for any of several reasons
.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Grand Duchy of Moscow, it was established in 1263? The source is also pretty explicit in naming Muscovy, not Russia in general. Can you explain further why you changed it? Does the article on the Grand Duchy of Moscow need to be corrected? Constantine ✍ 10:40, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply
]
Answered at
Talk:Nicolò Navazosio Ghirla-трёп- 11:23, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply
]
FAR notice
I have nominated
featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Hog FarmTalk 23:36, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply
File permission problem with File:Kirillov2005.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Kirillov2005.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
make a note permitting reuse under the
CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list
) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter
OTRS pending
}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. HouseBlastertalk 19:36, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Does this mean that the French-language article fr:Abbaye de Sozan should also be deleted? What about the part in in pectore where it says the Prince-Abbot of Sozan was created a cardinal in pectore? Or the Sozan-related files in the Commons? --Orange Mike | Talk 23:37, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Tilzit.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 09:26, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
File:Portrait of Count Nicholas Kamensky (btw. 1807 and 1810).jpg listed for discussion
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be
deleted for any of several reasons
.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Nekrasovtomb.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Great Depression in Central Europe until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Ghirlandajo, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
—Moops⋠T⋡ 15:29, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Onion dome has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Hog FarmTalk 14:25, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bogoroditsk.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:35, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This is an LTA, all removals mortivated by OR must be rolled back. They changes the IP addresses daily which makes the tracking more difficult. Ymblanter (talk) 21:26, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much. I am an inexperienced editor, yet I see so much abuse in this manner (you can probably tell how much it irritates me if you see my user page). By the way, I enjoyed your page, thank you so much for all your contributions to the original vision of Wikipedia. Cheers! Top5a (talk) 23:16, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The more recent edits at least same to be in the same range: 2603:7000:2101:AA00:0:0:0:0/64. I have noticed these for a while so I am not sure if the older edits will still be in that range. Mellk (talk) 23:31, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I have blocked the range, initially for two weeks. Ymblanter (talk) 11:14, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Just so you know, that range immediately went back to the same activity as soon as the block expired. @Ymblanter Cheers. Top5a (talk) 23:29, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Not yet, but if you see again the removal of unsourced but plausible material pls let me know, I will block the range long-term. Ymblanter (talk) 05:41, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, again! Just wanted to let you know that there were some recent edits made to the lede of the GUM page, as well as a renaming of the page, and I do not have the ability or knowledge to verify those changes. cc: @MellkTop5a (talk) 19:49, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the
2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
File permission problem with File:Russian Museum.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Russian Museum.jpg, which you've attributed to Sergey Galchenkov. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
make a note permitting reuse under the
CC BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list
) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter
}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --TheImaCow (talk) 16:36, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be
deleted for any of several reasons
.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Thanks for uploading File:Olyka.jpg, which you've attributed to Petro Vlasenko. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
make a note permitting reuse under the
CC BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list
) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter
}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --TheImaCow (talk) 15:48, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
.jpg)
Yours --
Hello, I'm Clarinetguy097. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Novorossiysk without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Clarinetguy097 (talk) 00:58, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
_by_shakko_.jpg)
APerson) 04:42, 26 June 2016 (UTC)]
This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
