User talk:Guinness323

Metagaming Concepts

It was truly a herculean effort for you to get through all the SPI games above, and even more impressive that you have apparently more than doubled the number of articles in that category over the past year or so! :o But there is nothing left in that category that you haven't already done, so if you like, we can look at other companies you have mostly cleaned up on, whenever you need a break from other things?

You've improved everything on the MicroGame line so far except for The Lords of Underearth. Dragons of Underearth is an RPG probably based on that game, and The Air-Eaters Strike Back! is a sequel to a different MicroGame. The Fantasy Trip was their biggest RPG (with the supplements Fantasy Masters' Codex, Fantasy Masters' Screen, and In the Labyrinth (supplement) and adventures including Death Test, Death Test 2, Master of the Amulets, Orb Quest, Security Station, and Tollenkar's Lair), and Monsters! Monsters! is another early RPG that they produced. Another historical game is The Trojan War (board game). That's it, you've gotten the other ones. :)

Articles uncreated then? Material first of all for The Fantasy Trip not yet created includes

Not that much! I will take a look at a few more companies eventually, preferably ones like these with a limited amount of releases - no more monster production companies like SPI! LOL  :) BOZ (talk) 01:25, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year. :) Back in 2020 we had gone through all the Origins Award/Charles S. Roberts Award winners from the 1970s and started articles for anything that did not have one. While you have been going through the Phoenix reviews and also now starting new articles, that reminded me that we left off with 1980. I saw quite a few reviews for Origins winners in what you have added so far, so it's not a stretch to think we might get a few more from the early 1980s as well? For the record, here are the remaining redlinked winners from the time period where Phoenix was in publication, in case any of these did actually have reviews:

1980

1981

1982

1983

If you find reviews in Phoenix so we can start any of those then great, otherwise we will get to them eventually.  :) BOZ (talk) 22:07, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ironbottom Sound is next on my list of new articles (review in Phoenix 36 + the award). I'll take another look for these others.Guinness323 (talk) 18:26, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can't wait! :) BOZ (talk) 18:56, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just noting that I recently added three PBM Origins Award winners: Starship Command, Forgotten Realms, and Fall of Rome. :) BOZ (talk) 05:12, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may or may not know of these already, but I went through all the titles at http://tacticalwargamer.com/magazines/magazines.htm and searched on archive.org, and these are what I found:

• Miniature Wargames (a few random issues): https://archive.org/details/MiniatureWargames111/Miniature_Wargames_111/
• The General: https://archive.org/details/general_magazine or a different collection: https://archive.org/details/TheGeneralVol21No5/The%20General%20Vol%2009%20No%202/
• Command: https://archive.org/search.php?query=%22command+magazine%22&sort=titleSorter

RPG magazines are much better represented on there, unfortunately! There may be more that I did not find, of course. But, this is at least something to work with. BOZ (talk) 15:43, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I restored Air Force (game) and moved it to draft space. :) BOZ (talk) 13:16, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent. :) If you ever spot anything more for any of these, they may yet have a future!:

• Archworld - wargame published in 1977 by Fantasy Games Unlimited [13]
• Battle of Monmouth (game) AFD - 1978 wargame about the American Revolution [14]
• Conflict (board game) (PROD) - game by Parker Brothers published in 1940 [15]
• Dragon Pass (redirected) - 1980 version of White Bear and Red Moon [16]
• Supremacy (1940 board game) AFD - World War II board wargame published in 1940 [17]
• Warlock (board game) AFD - 1979 fantasy combat game [18]

BOZ (talk) 13:17, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

One thing I should point out, and I think you may have access to some issues, but at User:BOZ/Casus Belli I have noted more than a few wargame reviews from that French publication - a much higher percentage than usual for an RPG magazine. :) BOZ (talk) 05:36, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alas, I did have a source for them, but that site was taken down recently. :( Guinness323 (talk) 17:11, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Argh, that's unfortunate!  :( BOZ (talk) 17:43, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just a heads up, as long as you have your wargame sources out; I recall that Games International reviewed wargames in nearly every issue, and that includes quite a few that I started as noted and are all linked to above: Tokyo Express* (Victory Games, 1988), Desert Falcons* (GDW, 1988), Test of Arms* (GDW, 1988), The Peninsular War (Rostherne Games, 1973), The Last Hurrah (Avalon Hill, 1988), Onslaught (TSR, 1987), La Bataille d'Albuera: Espagnol (Clash of Arms, 1987), The Emperor Returns (Clash of Arms, 1986), Fight for the Sky (Attactix, 1982), 8th Army (Attactix, 1982), Turning Point: Stalingrad (Avalon Hill, 1989), Arnhem Bridge (Attactix, 1982), Modern Naval Battles (3W, 1989), Tomorrow the World (3W, 1989), Light Division (3W, 1989), Hitler's Last Gamble (3W, 1989), Europe Aflame (TSR, 1989), Usuthu! (Valhalla Games, 1989), 5th Fleet (Victory Games, 1989), Rise and Fall (Engelmann, 1989), Napoleon's Battles (Avalon Hill, 1989), Red Barricades (Avalon Hill, 1989), Shell Shock! (Victory Games, 1990), and Modern Naval Battles II (3W, 1990), and possibly others if I missed them! BOZ (talk) 23:23, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In case you have the sources to make it work, the only MicroGame without an article is Sticks & Stones (board game) [19]. :) BOZ (talk) 01:14, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know if this is redundant to what you already had, but someone did take the time and trouble to put User:Rindis/Sources together. :) BOZ (talk) 12:46, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

To give myself something to do, to help out with your quest on the The Comprehensive Guide to Board Wargaming, I went through all the reviews on pages 128-187 and found links for everything there - hope that helps. :) I think I fairly accurately matched up the names of the games since the ones in the book tended to be abbreviated, but the ones with a ? were ones that I could not find a BGG link for. I included every game in the list, even the ones too brief to truly be considered reviews. BOZ (talk) 16:05, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yeoman, The Ythri, Yugoslavia[62]

Good work on John Hill by the way - that article has always looked pretty funky, and now it's improved. :) I don't know how many of these are wargame designers, but if you see anything at User:BOZ/Games deletions#Designers and artists worth working on, I can help you make that happen; I have drafts going for about half of these. BOZ (talk) 12:35, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I added links to Nick Palmer for all the articles that cited The Comprehensive Guide to Board Wargaming. I noticed a few that had other authors, so I switched those to Palmer, but if other people were involved in the book and I made an error, those will be easy to find using my edit summary of "fix name of author and add link". I also caught a weird citation on Stellar Conquest, see #3 under the Reception section and tell me what you think. :) BOZ (talk) 04:27, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! That saved me a mountain of work. I did have to go back and change those other names to what they had been -- Palmer sometimes used his friends in the game industry to write reviews. (Charles Vasey, for instance, was at the time the well-known editor of the influential zine Perfidious Albion.) Guinness323 (talk) 05:42, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

OK gotcha, I wasn't sure about the names, which is why I said something. :) I was in the mood for a repetitive task, so there you go.  ;) On the Stellar Conquest article, you have a review from Moves, but the citation is for TCGTBW, so I'm not sure what went wrong there. :) BOZ (talk) 10:57, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Another good catch, thanks. Guinness323 (talk) 22:18, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

LOL, thanks to us Category:Wargames introduced in the 1970s is enormous. :) You likely noticed me creating "RPG supplements by year" categories, so I will probably want to do the same for this category as well later this week because it's grown considerably. :) BOZ (talk) 02:26, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I went ahead and went through the index in the back of The Complete Book of Wargames to see what is done and not yet done, and at this point it is mostly done. :) I hope this helps! BOZ (talk) 15:12, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yeoman

Awesome work as always on the already-existing articles. :) If it helps you prioritize at all, you've got Unentschieden, Revolt in the East, Stonewall, Troy, and Yalu (or at least games with the same names) on your 2023 to-do list. BOZ (talk) 20:49, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know if these were on your radar, but I found reviews for Dark December (game), Dauntless (game), and Battles of the Hundred Days so I started them, in addition to Crescendo of Doom from last week. :) BOZ (talk) 21:30, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I started one for French wargame Napoléon à Austerlitz yesterday as well.  :) BOZ (talk) 15:29, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I started another French wargame La Bataille de Valmy today. :) BOZ (talk) 19:40, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In case you haven't seen it before, my current huge project is User:BOZ/BTG reviews noticeboard which has its own section for Wargames. :) In particular, since you've done lots (and lots and lots!) of Simulations Publications games, I want to let you know that while I did not list all the SPI games reviewed in "Moves" (too many!) there are still some there in case you want to hit any of them, namely: Chicago, Chicago! with at least one independent review listed on that noticeboard page. :) BOZ (talk) 00:01, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I know you've had a chance to peruse my noticeboard for game articles worth starting, so you probably noticed that there were games there from the The Comprehensive Guide to Board Wargaming and The Complete Book of Wargames lists that I posted above. If it helps to list them out, those include Waterloo (game) by Avalon Hill, in case you have the sources to make any of those work. :) I will see what other sources come up for these other classic wargames that haven't been started already! BOZ (talk) 04:52, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have other sources for one or two of these, will post new articles in the coming weeks.Guinness323 (talk) 06:56, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have any sources to help build up the reception sections on Curse of the Mummy's Tomb (board game) and Gorkamorka? BOZ (talk) 17:44, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Partly for the sake of building up articles that need it, and partly to stave off future deletion attempts, I think it is a good idea to pick a few articles with potential here and there for a little improvement. Do you see any more sources to help build the reception section on the Origins award-winning Adventures in Middle-earth which was once nominated for AFD? Or do you see anything for other award-winners Star Wars Roleplaying Game (Fantasy Flight Games) or Settlers of America: Trails to Rails? BOZ (talk) 12:32, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just got back from a short vacation, I'll look at these once I can find my desk again. Guinness323 (talk) 04:03, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I should have said sooner, but I hope your vacation was good, and glad to have you back. :) BOZ (talk) 10:24, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, vacation was great. I've taken on a new project, I came across Nicolas Palmer's 1977 book 1977 book The Comprehensive Guide to Board Wargaming, and there are a lot of reviews in there that should alllow me to launch several dozen new articles. I'll try to work away at two or three of those per week. That should still leave me time to take on a few odds and ends you toss my way, like the two mentioned in the previous paragraph. Guinness323 (talk) 07:06, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I have definitely noticed, you are rocking and rolling on those! :) Wow, several dozen? If you also have access to The Complete Book of Wargames by Jon Freeman (1980) you'll really clean house with the reviews. Palmer also had a 1980 sequel to his book, The Best of Board Wargaming, although I don't know if that one had reviews. BOZ (talk) 12:25, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

See anything more for another award-winner, The Shackled City Adventure Path? BOZ (talk) 00:50, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing so far.Guinness323 (talk) 07:06, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough! How about the you'd-think-it-was-more-notable Legend of the Five Rings Roleplaying Game? BOZ (talk) 23:32, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Or another award winner, Shadowrun Duels? BOZ (talk) 02:29, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Or how about another award winner, Hero Realms? BOZ (talk) 02:00, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The earliest Fighting Fantasy books should have received a good amount of coverage, but Deathtrap Dungeon in particular seems that it should have more to say in the reception section! BOZ (talk) 13:59, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Serenity Role Playing Game won both an Origins and an Ennie but that reception is almost nothing! BOZ (talk) 13:16, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've got to figure that an adventure like The Forgotten Temple of Tharizdun would have more coverage out there too! BOZ (talk) 22:12, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It may be a little obscure, but maybe Wild West (role-playing game) has more to it out there? I suspect that Down with the King (game) may have more reviews hiding somewhere for it, and likewise with Enchanted Forest (game). BOZ (talk) 23:58, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

More Origins-winners with no reception include Axis & Allies Miniatures and Polarity (game), and then I would also think that the Endless Quest series would have more too? BOZ (talk) 03:15, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mississippi Queen (board game) won a major award, and I found one review as well, but I figure there has got to be more! Necromunda is another game where I found one review and would expect to see more, and likewise for Star Hero. :) BOZ (talk) 15:03, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I noted on the unsourced article Conflict of Heroes: Awakening the Bear! that it won an award, but that's all it's got so far. Conquest of the Empire seems to me like it might have more, and so does Revolt On Antares. BOZ (talk) 18:22, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Railway Rivals strikes me as a classic that should definitely have more sources. General Quarters (rules) didn't have much going for it until I saw that it won an Origins award. Star Trek: The Next Generation Role-playing Game has an award and one review, but I think it may have more. BOZ (talk) 18:33, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I expect that Starfleet Voyages may have some more sources? I would say the same of award winner Qin: The Warring States. The Maztica Campaign Set also seems like it has been getting more attention lately. I think Zargo's Lords might be one that you might be able to find more on. BOZ (talk) 23:59, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I have to think an Origins award winning wargame like Vietnam: 1965-1975 has more sources out there, and same with Ennie award winning campaign setting Freedom City. I likewise have to believe there is a lot more out there for the Middle-earth Collectible Card Game. BOZ (talk) 12:55, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just a few more of these for now, and then no more for a while. First of all, I have to think that Magic Wood is different enough that it might have more sources. Then a couple of Milton Bradley games most likely garnered some sort of attention, Broadsides and Boarding Parties and Power Barons. BOZ (talk) 00:52, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've got a few more here, for whenever. System 7 Napoleonics is a somewhat obscure award winner that has a couple of reviews from Dragon, but maybe your wargame sources have more for it since you last looked at this one three years ago. Similarly, I wonder if Vector 3 has another review or two? Also to toss in a more recent D&D adventure, The Dungeon of Death seems like it has potential. :) BOZ (talk) 23:50, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Trail of Cthulhu won Ennies and I figure it's got to have more to it, and it surprises me that I haven't found more for The Temple of Elemental Evil, and likewise B-17, Queen of the Skies! BOZ (talk) 22:47, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just one more for now! Deadlands: Hell on Earth has a couple of reviews on it, but I'm fairly sure this one has more out there. BOZ (talk) 22:53, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Guinness323,

As you may know, Ogre, to which you have significantly contributed, is continuing to be assessed for GA, and I have observed your changes, which are commendable and improve the article substantially.

Nevertheless, the current consensus is not established yet, but the current general view is that the article is likely B-class or C-class after those improvements. I have added some of my possible suggestions in the GA Reassessment Notes under the talk section for this article, so if you could follow those suggestions and add more factual detail to ensure that it could hopefully retain its GA status that would be great- VickKiang (talk) 00:45, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you'd like to start an entry on that (from List of SPI games), I'd be happy to expand it from pl:Gwiezdny kupiec. That game was (illegally?) published in late communist Poland, and became a cult classic, which is confirmed by RS which certainly makes it notable. A Polish sf writer wrote an accompanying story, and the game has even a number of modern era retro-reviews like this one (I can list more for you if you'd like to machine translate them). _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:35, 24 June 2022 (UTC) Ps. Also ping User:BOZ. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:51, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@BOZ:, just to save you the time and effort of creating stubs for the following, I will be creating these articles in 2023:

• Red Sun Rising
• Saratoga 1777
• Siege of Jerusalem
• Trireme
• Up Scope!
• Victory at Sea

If I can find more sources, I'll also create the following:

• Fortress Rhodesia
• 1944: The Invasion of France
• MTB
• Mukden, 1905
• Rheinbung
• Raid
• U-Boat

And of course, I will always be available for help with other projects or articles. Guinness323 (talk) 19:28, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh OK! I thought I was actually trying to save you time and give myself something to do. :) I hope the stubs I did create helped out in some way. Is that a different game you have listed from The Siege of Jerusalem? I might focus on some of the other games listed in The Comprehensive Guide to Board Wargaming that you did not list above - the majority of games in that book now do have articles, but there are still a lot of redlinks there. :) BOZ (talk) 19:31, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Haha, just trying to save you some work. I have also been working my way through Palmer's TCGtBW, and I haven't found another source for the following, making Palmer the single source. If you come across anything, let me know:

• DMZ
• Four Roads to Moscow
• Helm's Deep
• Hitler's Last Gamble
• Jerusalem
• Marine
• NORAD
• Patton
• Rifle & Musket
• Raiders of the North
• StarSoldier
• Strategy I
• Spanish Civil War
• Warsaw Pact (reviews in JagdPanther #14 and Nexus #1 that I haven't been able to track down yet) Guinness323 (talk) 20:41, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Re Siege of Jerusalem, oops! Yes, that article. Duhhh! Guinness323 (talk) 20:46, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This site does list reviews for March on India, World War II, and Wellington in the Peninsula, or at least games of the same name: [75]. Save yourself some time on StarSoldier as well. :) BOZ (talk) 21:09, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I need a better filing system :) Guinness323 (talk) 00:36, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Panzer 44 is in this book: [76] and if one of those "World War II"s above should be a III, then that one is in the book too: [77]. BOZ (talk) 20:22, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Is Overlord (wargame) the game from Conflict Games that you're looking for? :) BOZ (talk) 14:55, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. I've found sources for Conflict's Overlord in Freeman's Comprehensive Guide and the 1980 Guide to Simulations and Games, but if you've got others, let me know. I've been busy reading old issues of Games & Puzzles, looking for reviews, but will return to creating new articles in a few days. Guinness323 (talk) 19:30, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've found quite a few, and added links to the articles, or in some cases I started new articles:

Ad-Lib, The Great Train Robbery, The Stock Market Game, Operation, Alexander, Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, Blockword, Pay-Day, Gimel, Downfall, Fortune (game), Dungeon!, Sirius, Freedom in the Galaxy, and likely other reviews that I just did not discover yet. And as always, there are many other games reviewed that do not (as far as I know) have articles yet! BOZ (talk) 19:39, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

It's not really related to Games & Puzzles, but I do want to tell you that I also restored Oh-Wah-Ree yesterday. BOZ (talk) 14:12, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I also got Isolation (board game) restored and it has been moved to draft space. BOZ (talk) 06:14, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I found a couple of reviews in a French magazine for Isolation, and moved it back to article space. :) BOZ (talk) 23:09, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I found another review for Freedom in the Galaxy in issue 77[78] along with two wargames about China. BOZ (talk) 17:02, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh noooooo not Different Worlds![79] :( Oh well, I managed to make sure to download copies of all the issues a while ago, so I can continue with it when I'm ready to pick back up with the reviews sometime in early 2024. BOZ (talk) 13:12, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

:( Guinness323 (talk) 16:28, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On the other hand, we DO have this recent addition! :) [80] BOZ (talk) 18:01, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nice!! Guinness323 (talk) 03:54, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know if you noticed this, but it is a bit concerning, and I noticed it a few days ago. RPGGeek used to list magazine reviews for the game products, but it seems like now they don't: [81] Fortunately RPGnet still does, although they have proven less comprehensive: [82] I hope that is temporary and not a functionality intentionally removed. :( BOZ (talk) 12:39, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fingers crossed that it's temporary. Guinness323 (talk) 06:03, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That big collection is probably gone for good, but I will say that I did find copies of issues #39 to #47 so at least we have those!: [83] BOZ (talk) 02:20, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Huzzah! Serves me right for not downloading everything when it was up. Guinness323 (talk) 02:55, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In better news, someone went ahead and uploaded White Dwarf #1-100 again!: [84] :) BOZ (talk) 03:37, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Letting you know that the edit notice is now live - if you edit any article with refideas listed on the talk page, you will get the notification. :) BOZ (talk) 23:54, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nice! Guinness323 (talk) 06:42, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So, you posted this thread a little over a year ago, at which point it looked like this before I started hacking away at it: [85] with an ambitious 40 articles that you intended to start, another 14 in the maybe and another 23 as hopefuls with just one source. I am proud to report that you have started more than half of that entire list, including almost 3/4 of the ones that you were definitely planning on doing. :) This, I must say, was in addition to many other wargame and other articles you started that were not even on this list, as well as me pestering you to work on articles whose notability was challenged and/or that I just wanted to see what you could do with them. I always feel that you do some really impressive things here, and I hope you continue as long as you can and still want to. :)

True confession time, I know you started this thread to save me the work of creating stubs, but I went ahead and did several more anyway earlier this week. :) I took a look at the list that was left, and found anything that I could point at being in at least two solid sources, and made a stub for each of those. So, think of them as something you can look at whenever, but I gave a starting point for Siege!, SSN, Stonewall, Troy, Yalu, March on India, Verdun, and Viva! BOZ (talk) 19:50, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nice find with "Monsters, Aliens, and Holes in the Ground" by the way. :) If you see a decent amount of coverage for a game/supplement/adventure/whatever that we don't currently have an article for, let me know and I will see what I can do! I wouldn't want to be missing out on something important that is worth covering, while our existing articles are getting built up nicely. BOZ (talk) 18:30, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It was a Christmas present. I'm up to 1981, and I haven't hit anything that doesn't already have an article yet, but I expect when I hit the 1990s and 2000s, there will be more obscure products. Guinness323 (talk) 20:14, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's a cool present. :D Yep, you are definitely more likely to find gaps at that point. BOZ (talk) 20:27, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How did you stumble upon those?

FYI: https://web.archive.org/web/20220814110606/https://www.rebel.pl/rebel-times/147-grudzien-2019.html - it was live few weeks ago, sigh. The pdfs are still there. I'll add the review from #10 to that article. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:57, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Cover art for Wrath of Denethenor 1986.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:07, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Something Rotten in Kislev, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dave Allen.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This game depicted the 1631 battle not the 1642 one. I played it as a child and remember King Gustav having a piece. He was dead by 1642 and I wouldn't recall his name if not for the game. Please read this[86] also for proof of what I am saying.Lost in Quebec (talk) 17:47, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]