User talk:Hey man im josh

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Congrats!

Congratulations once again, Josh!! That watchlist page does come in handy, thanks! Regards, John Bringingthewood (talk) 22:06, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, thank you!! Sure does haha. Hey man im josh (talk) 22:08, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Always my pleasure. I'm going to start typing 'ditto' under those notices. You'll know what I mean, lol. Keep on going!!!! Bringingthewood (talk) 22:11, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
P.S. Good call, Josh! Looks like Barrett is going to the Dolphins! Bringingthewood (talk) 21:11, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Bringingthewood: I figured he wasn't done! They'd have let him retire if he had no intention of playing instead of cutting him. Anyways, the more I've thought about it since we talked the more I feel better about the idea of not removing the active tag under the first week of games is over. Players waiting out free agency and training camp, sometimes even pre-season, is all too common. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:25, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, that didn't take long at all. First week does sound good, I should have thought of that before touching that page. Thank God it was a painless revert, lol. Catch you when another star is posted!! Regards, Bringingthewood (talk) 02:09, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Did I miss something overnight regarding Greg Lloyd Pro Bowl highlighted in the career statistics box? Bringingthewood (talk) 02:16, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Bringingthewood: A quick look at PFR shows him as having 5. Hey man im josh (talk) 02:31, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No, no, not the amount, it's the highlight in yellow. I never saw Pro Bowl's added in color for the NFL career statistics chart. Bringingthewood (talk) 02:49, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Bringingthewood: I see now that I'm not on mobile. No, we definitely don't display Pro Bowl selections in the stat tables normally. I've reached out to them. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:11, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for reaching out. I think I'm going to have to follow up on some of these. Seems like it's a copy and paste deal with some, because there are no 'led league' and 'NFL record' for a few. Those colors don't need to be there. Whatever, I'll catch up with you soon. Thanks again. Bringingthewood (talk) 00:42, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bonito (song)

You removed my article and made it redirect to a broader article. Not very kind and you didn’t really provide an explanation which sucks because I put a lot of effort into it. It was Bonito (Song) referring to the Jarabe de Palo song. BBeachBall (talk) 03:31, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @
WP:AFC. You are under no obligation to utilize it, but it's usually a very helpful and useful tool to get feedback when you're writing your first few articles. You can find the draft at Draft:Bonito (song). Hey man im josh (talk) 12:22, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
@BBeachBall: I just realized I pinged the wrong person when I tried to respond to you. Just replying to ping again to make sure you're aware of the above. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:51, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Chicago Bears first-round draft picks, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fred Davis.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, Hey man im josh! The list you nominated, List of New England Patriots first-round draft picks, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.
This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, PresN (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That didn't take long!

You're quicker than a free agent finding a new team! CONGRATS!! Regards, John - Bringingthewood (talk) 23:33, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you thank you! Hopefully a new nom up to day or tomorrow! Hey man im josh (talk) 14:28, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Always a pleasure! Cool! In the promotion message it mentions the word 'rare', I see you don't go along with that, lol. Keep up the great work! Bringingthewood (talk) 20:33, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Adil Raja's Wikipedia Page

I believe that Adil Raja's Wikipedia page should be reinstated. You asked for a few good reliable website sources. Here are many good, reliable sources. Please bring his page back so I can edit it. Btw, there is some more recent news on him. So I believe that he's eligible for a Wikipedia page. This is definitely more than the 3 required. Moreover, they are form different news agencies including some international news agencies. Lastly, there are different news about him. Not just one main event. Please consider reinstating the Wikipedia page. Do update me with your decision. Thank you so much!! :)

  1. Metropolitan Police letter to Pakistani retired major is fake | Reuters
  2. Ms Marvel actor lashes out at ‘honey trap’ claim: ‘Shame on people who blindly believe this bulls***’ | The Independent
  3. Rights, press bodies slam Pakistan crackdown on ‘critical voices’ | Freedom of the Press News | Al Jazeera
  4. https://asianlite.com/2023/news/asia-diaspora-news/pakistan/isis-smuggling-network-and-its-links-to-khalistan-movement-exposed/
  5. UK quashes terror probing against Pakistani social media activist
  6. Profile: Who is Adil Farooq Raja?
  7. https://www.abvsolicitors.co.uk/articles/adil-raja-press-release/
  8. https://ispr.gov.pk/press-release-detail?id=6679
  9. Adil Raja ‘arrested’ in London; Sabir, Moeed booked for sedition
  10. MM News
  11. https://arynews.tv/tag/adil-raja/
  12. PTI distances itself from YouTubers Adil Raja, Haider Mehdi
  13. Adil Raja, Haider Mehdi sentenced for inciting sedition: ISPR
  14. Kubra, Sajal, Mehwish break silence on allegations by Adil Raja
  15. Major Adil Raja Wikipedia, Video, Age, Wife, Family & Biography
  16. https://www.geo.tv/latest/493454-adil-raja-arrested-by-uk-counter-terrorism-police-for-overseas-offences
  17. Big progress in the inquiry against Adil Raja! | Geo News - YouTube
  18. "Adil Raja" site:dunyanews.tv - Google Search
  19. "Adil Raja" site:thenews.com.pk - Google Search
  20. "Adil Raja" site:geo.tv - Google Search
  21. "Adil Raja" site:nation.com.pk - Google Search
  22. Amnesty International ‘extremely concerned’ about crackdown on dissenting voices in Pakistan | Arab News PK
  23. "Adil Raja" site:gnnhd.tv - Google Search
  24. https://twitter.com/soldierspeaks
  25. https://www.jasarat.com/en/pakistan-army-sentences-major-r-adil-raja-captain-r-raza-mehdi/
  26. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0tA6wnPH3eQ
  27. https://thefridaytimes.com/14-Jun-2023/adil-raja-released-after-brief-detention-by-uk-police
  28. https://www.bolnews.com/tag/adil-raja/
  29. https://soldierspeaks.org/about-me/
  30. https://uk.linkedin.com/in/adilfarooqraja-00923444181818
  31. https://twitter.com/IHRF_English/status/1669287220031700994

WarriorYt43 (talk) 12:49, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@
WP:AFC process, especially considering your conflict of interest with the subject. Editors will review your draft and give feedback on what issues may exist and, if they believe if to be fit for main space, they'll accept the draft and move it to main space. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:03, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
Alright. I did mention my Conflict of Interest but I'll try to make a very neutral page which they can review. Thank you for the response WarriorYt43 (talk) 14:44, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Josh. So I made a draft Draft:Adil Raja. Please check it out. I cited everything properly. I need help with something. I told Adil to upload the images as his own work. He did. But they all of his images from his Wikimedia account. How do I upload those images on Wikimedia without them removing them? Last time I uploaded them and Adil emailed them and gave me permission but they still removed them. Are there any different sites that I can use to upload them to make them copyright free? Adil himself is giving me permission. Please assist. Thanks! WarriorYt43 (talk) 14:17, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thoughts

I have had a desire to create a page summarizing all of the Green Bay Packers#Rivalries. I was wondering if I could ask your opinion on format. I am struggling between a typical list format (see Draft:Green Bay Packers rivalries) with a Lead, History section, Rivalry section (main table) and maybe a section on "Non-rivalry rivalries". But I fear that with only 8 items, I am in that grey area where I may get opposes based on the list being too short. My other thought was to write it as an article style, with a short blurb summarizing each rivalry and maybe just have the table in a summary section at the beginning. Then take it through GAN instead of FLC. What do you think? « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 14:25, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Gonzo fan2007: I think you're right that it would struggle at FLC. I'm not really sure of the best way to go about that either. The blurbs like that at Green Bay Packers#Rivalries does make sense to me if you go that route though, as a "List of Green Bay Packers rivalries", would include some explanation of the rivalry. It'd be tough to do so in a fashion other than blurbs if you wanted to actually explain that these are rivalries I think. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:12, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Permission remove request

Dear Hey man im josh, Hello and Thank you for reply on

WP:PERM/NPP but I've decided to take long wikibreak of one week and I've going from Wikipedia temporary because I face few probelm in our personal life , so, I decided to removing my other permission except extended confirmed users ,so, I request to you please remove these permission from my account at this time because I'm not came until 28 March 2024 on Wikipedia.😊~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 16:04, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Good luck on your exams @Aviram7. I've removed your permissions. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:09, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Hey man im josh, Thank you :)~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 16:34, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

NFL Draft capitalization

Josh, I'm unclear on whether you think there are some contexts in Wikipedia text in which it would not be contrary to guidelines to capitalize Draft (in the NFL context). The R from miscapitalization tag is a maintenance thing, useful to help us find such over-capitalization, and fix it; recall that the RfC was about "in article text and titles". It's not an assertion that it's an error to capitalize it in other styles, outside of WP articles. Your edit summary (this is not a miscapitalization/error, it's an alternative capitalization. NFL and all associated teams use a MoS that capitalizes "Draft") suggests you have a different interpretation. Dicklyon (talk) 21:41, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Dicklyon: It's not just a maintenance tag. If you read the text of what you added it classifies the pages as an error in capitalization instead of an alternative one. There's a difference and categorizing these capitalizations as incorrect instead of alternative would be inaccurate. Hey man im josh (talk) 21:46, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If you read a bit more of the template documentation, it says "This redirect is made available to aid searches or to maintain links. Pages that use this link should be updated to link directly to the correct form without using a piped link hiding the correct details." That's the purpose, not to say it would be an error for the NFL or someone else to cap it. Dicklyon (talk) 21:54, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Dicklyon: The rcat template states that the capitalization is an error. These capitalizations are not errors, they are alternatives. I mentioned the NFL and the teams of it using an MoS that capitalizes "Draft" as the proper name of an event because it's contextually relevant. While I've accepted that Wikipedia's policies have resulted in downcasing, it's still treated as a proper name in enough situations to say it's wrong to call it an error. Hey man im josh (talk) 21:57, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I started by asking about "contexts in Wikipedia text in which it would not be contrary to guidelines to capitalize Draft". You're saying there are some. What are they? Dicklyon (talk) 00:14, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Dicklyon: What? I'm saying that "NFL Draft" is not an incorrect capitalization when you consider the usage of it. The articles were down cased based on inconsistent capitalization in sources, not based on a determination that it's not a proper name. I encourage you to check out Wikipedia:Template index/Redirect pages. There you will find that r from other capitalization is used for capitalisation differences that are not incorrect. Hey man im josh (talk) 00:25, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
But "incorrect" should be interpreted in the context of Wikipedia. Per Wikipedia style, these are incorrect. We're not telling the NFL or anyone else not to use them, just ourselves. Dicklyon (talk) 00:36, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Dicklyon: Technically one title is considered the most correct, but that does not make others wrong. If I follow your logic correctly, then there shouldn't be any pages tagged with r from other/alternative capitalizations. There's wrong and then there's what best complies with policy. It's not a significant difference, but we shouldn't be labelling it as incorrect, which is what the text in the r from miscapitalization outright says. Hey man im josh (talk) 00:45, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe we should rely more on
Template:R from over-capitalization, which says "This shortcut is used specifically to flag cases of redirects from overly capitalized names that violate WP:NCCAPS and MOS:CAPS", though at present it's just a redirect so will show the same message calling it an error. I had taken to using that recently, in at least some, maybe all, of the ones you changed. Dicklyon (talk) 02:18, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
@Dicklyon: Perhaps you should propose a change to the wording of one template or the deletion of one. As it stands now, the redirects are not "incorrect" capitalizations and should not be classified as such. Hey man im josh (talk) 02:21, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And I'm not sure what "without using a piped link hiding the correct details" means here. Dicklyon (talk) 21:55, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I started a discussion in the direction you suggested, and listed it at

WT:MOSCAPS, where capitalization-related discussions are usually linked, for the benefit of editors who care about such things. So why did you revert that listing, saying it's not an MOS discussion? Most of the other stuff listed there is also not about MOS, but is about capitalization issues. Dicklyon (talk) 10:23, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

@Dicklyon: It's a discussion about rcats, not about the MoS. I think that's pretty clear and adding it to the area that editors canvas for support at is not helpful. Hey man im josh (talk) 10:42, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Seriously, you think that editors concerned with capitalization are somehow too biased to be invited to a discussion about how capitalization problems are categorized? Dicklyon (talk) 10:48, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Dicklyon: I think the MoS pages shouldn't be used to advertise discussions that are not about the MoS. If you should have notified anybody it would be redirect WikiProject. Hey man im josh (talk) 11:07, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Do you know a good place to notify people who care about capitalization issues, if not MOSCAP? I don't see how this is different from all the other capitalization-related-discussion notifications. Are you wanting to leave such people out of the discussion? Dicklyon (talk) 11:12, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Dicklyon: Well there's no capitalization WikiProject. Rcats and the interpretation of their usage are not MoS and I don't really understand the strong push for including that discussion there. Hey man im josh (talk) 11:19, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That's the thing. There's no capitalization Wikiproject, and if there was there'd be no way to link all the articles it's relevant to. But MOSCAPS is where capitalization issues are typically discussed; not about the MOS, but about its application and interpretation. Sure the other/mis capitalization question falls into that, as RM discussions do. This is where people who argue about capitalization will be found, and they're the ones likely to have ideas about the "error" issue and link maintenance and such. Dicklyon (talk) 11:28, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@
WP:NPP (they review and tag tens of thousands of redirects every year) and Wikipedia:WikiProject Redirect. Never the less, this is moot, since someone else has restored it and accused me of harassment and I'm not going to edit war to remove it. Hey man im josh (talk) 11:52, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
For one thing, these categories are about maintenance, which is done by people who care about capitalization (and/or "argue about" as you say). If you don't tag the miscapitalizations, they're harder to find and fix. The tag says that's what it's for. Dicklyon (talk) 22:48, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I hope you did notify those other projects. I'll check later and do so if you haven't. Got to run now. Dicklyon (talk) 22:49, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Dicklyon: The tag says it's for errors in capitalization, that's the part that I'm focused on. I'm sorry if someone else built a report out of just one subcategory, but that doesn't mean we should apply an incorrect tag to pages just so they appear in a certain maintenance report. Instead, that report should be modified to include pages from other capitalization and not just from the errors in capitalization category. I also did notify NPP and the redirect WikiProject. Hey man im josh (talk) 23:05, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That other template says it "is used on approximately 412,000 pages, or roughly 1% of all pages." Not useful for a report. The "mis" template is for things that links to ought to be fixed. Dicklyon (talk) 04:38, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If they're using a capitalization that links to {{
r from other capitalization}} it should still typically be fixed. "It leads to the title in accordance with the Wikipedia naming conventions for capitalisation, or it leads to a title that is associated in some way with the conventional capitalisation of this redirect title." – So, based on MoS, we would want to fix the capitalizations (in most cases) anyways. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:35, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Song redirects again

Hello. I sent you a message regarding ambiguous song redirects in December:

Idle Hands (song) is ambiguous); already another song listed at Residue (so Residue (song) should not point to just one album); and you also pointed Art (song) to just one album despite Art (disambiguation) listing at least one song at the time of you creating that redirect. Please consider this further. It would really help. Thanks. Ss112 10:39, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

@Ss112: I have taken care to avoid this happening. I've actually been creating quite a few redirects to disambiguation pages when I find instances where the format would be ambiguous. With that said, I definitely missed the capitalization differences leading to dab pages. Art and Residue are indeed mistakes I shake my head at. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:08, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

NPP

Hello, apologies to you bother. I sent you an email a few days ago asking if my request to be a page reviewer could be reviewed, but I am not sure if you saw it, so I am writing on here to let you know. Thanks! Antny08 (talk) 15:08, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Someone will review your request at their earliest convenience @Antny08. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:11, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, thanks! Antny08 (talk) 15:27, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good articles

Hi Josh. Stupid question. Can someone just add or remove a good article I_Look_to_You? I'll revert, if I'm wrong I'll put them back. Seems too easy for someone to do such a thing. Bringingthewood (talk) 21:59, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

UPDATE: Myself and two other editors reverted them. They also received a warning. Honestly, I thought only someone like yourself could do those types of edits. Pretty scary if someone doesn't even have to join up to add/remove good articles. Oh well, catch you later. John. Bringingthewood (talk) 21:44, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
P.S. Can I add one to T. J. Watt's page? (You didn't hear that from me, lol.) Bringingthewood (talk) 21:47, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Shoot, I'm sorry I didn't respond to this @
Good Article Nomination process. Typically a bot will be the one to add these icons (at least they do for featured articles and lists). Hey man im josh (talk) 12:32, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
Not a problem, Josh. That's what I thought. But I also thought that if an IP or whoever copied and pasted that type of material.. they might get stopped at the door. It doesn't seem that way. Still it's scary when anyone can touch something like that. Hey! Maybe I'll go and make all your articles, "featured articles" ... only kidding! Enjoy the rest of your week. Regards, John Bringingthewood (talk) 00:27, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Btw, I just edited Calais Campbell, making him a free agent List_of_NFL_career_sacks_leaders. Another editor may drop by and remove the (blue--active), not knowing about our prior conversation. I say this because free agents: C. Jones, Dunlap, and Quinn all show as 'former'. - Bringingthewood (talk) 01:07, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Potential for FL?

Hi Josh, just had a quick question since you are a regular at FL and I've not yet broached that topic area. Does the format at Foliosum have potential to become featured if it is made complete? I know that FLs require a sort of gravitas that isn't always obvious to outsiders, and I'm just wondering if there's merit to this kind of article there if they were to be fully fleshed out. I could see myself trying to work on a series of them this year if that is the case. Thank you! Fritzmann (message me) 01:46, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @
WP:FLC. I've found a number of examples that I think match up with what you're looking to do at Wikipedia:Featured lists#Plants under the names section. I'm not super familiar with the subject myself, but some of those examples there look like what you're trying to do, right? I think if they were up to it, your best person to ask for help would be @Dank. They created and promoted 10 of the 11 lists in that section. A couple notes I have is that you'd need to expand the lead, as two sentences just won't do, and I think you might also need to consider a slight renaming of the article. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:53, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
Thanks! I'll ask them, and I appreciate you pointing me in the right direction. Fritzmann (message me) 13:14, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:You (season 5)

I created it in the mainspace, then moved it to the draftspace per

WP:NTV. Someone else moved it back to the mainspace after it met WP:NTV, yet I'm not the creator? Kailash29792 (talk) 12:39, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

@Kailash29792: The creator of the page is shown as Wholog56. I recognize that you created the article that is now in main space, but redirects left behind as the result of a page move are not G7 eligible if nominated by someone other than the person who moved the page (unless the redirect was subsequently blanked after the move). Are you trying to move the main space page back into draft space since someone else had moved it? If so, that would be a G6 deletion, and I would be happy to carry that out. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:41, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No, I'm gonna leave it at that. Had I known earlier the season started filming, I would've moved it myself and G7'd the draft prefix. But too bad I live in a different time zone. Kailash29792 (talk) 12:45, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Kailash29792: I don't understand, is there something wrong with a redirect from draft space pointing to the main space version? Hey man im josh (talk) 12:45, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Yekanoglu and Mithras Yekanoglu

Hi! I was hoping for some guidance/assistance on an issue I believe could be vandalism (and is at best COI), but is not blatant enough to report outright. This user, as well as IP User

Wikipedia:NOTHERE. Notably, this user also made a hoax edit to Wikidata so that {{wd-ceo}} would display Yekanoglu instead of the real CEO, Gary Nagle. Your assistance here would be greatly appreciated! Thesixthstaff (talk) 16:45, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

@Thesixthstaff: I'm sorry I missed your message yesterday, but I'm glad to see it's been dealt with. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:36, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Permission restoration request

Dear Hey man im josh , Hello and I've decided to back on english Wikipedia after a long time wikibreak, I ready to work on Wikipedia again, so, please add my permission on my account;if you feel comfortable.😊~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 13:33, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Aviram7:  Done. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:36, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Hey man im josh, Thank you for restoring my permission from immediate effect. 😊~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 13:42, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You've got mail!

Hello, Hey man im josh. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 16:43, 27 March 2024 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{
ygm
}} template.

YGM Steel1943 (talk) 16:43, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've responded @Steel1943. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:48, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ho Yan Lee

Thank you for the quick decline. I've submitted a

sockpuppet report. Robert McClenon (talk) 14:57, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

@Robert McClenon: Thanks for the heads up. I'll keep an eye out for similar drafts at AfC moving forward. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:00, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The original submitter was blocked as a spammer. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:02, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah I hadn't noticed their name when reviewing but I did notice after you visited my talk page that it was an appropriate spam username block. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:03, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]