User talk:ITBF

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

to-do list

DYK for Donald Mackintosh (shooter)

On 27 December 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Donald Mackintosh (shooter), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Donald Mackintosh (pictured) was posthumously awarded an Olympic gold medal for shooting 22 live pigeons in a row? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Donald Mackintosh (shooter). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Donald Mackintosh (shooter)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

--valereee (talk) 12:01, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for SS Petriana

On 9 April 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article SS Petriana, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that SS Petriana was wrecked 200 metres (660 ft) off the Australian coast, but its crew were not allowed to land in Australia? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/SS Petriana. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, SS Petriana), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:01, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Richard Grenfell Thomas

On 16 May 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Richard Grenfell Thomas, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Richard Grenfell Thomas and Isabel Bear scientifically described the smell of rain, for which Thomas coined the term "petrichor"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Richard Grenfell Thomas. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Richard Grenfell Thomas), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:01, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Herbert Payne

On 3 November 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Herbert Payne, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that voter turnout increased by 32 percentage points following the passage of Herbert Payne's bill to introduce compulsory voting in Australian federal elections? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Herbert Payne. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Herbert Payne), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 12:01, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


DYK for Francis Hagai

On 25 April 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Francis Hagai, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Francis Hagai instituted communal sharing of sliced banana as a parallel to the sacramental bread of the Eucharist? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Francis Hagai. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Francis Hagai), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:01, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Poona emerald field

Hello, ITBF. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Poona emerald field
".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion
. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 18:16, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Hello, ITBF. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "New Protection
".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion
. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 03:29, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Atmotic Ship

request
that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

talk) 08:01, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Clarrie Fallon
moved to draftspace

An article you recently created,

general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 12:49, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Hello, Your recent reversion [1] stated the reason for the reversion as "refer the text of the act which bans undue influence and treating". The 1962 amendment had nothing to do with treating i.e. bribery, manipulation or other inducement to vote a certain way in an election. The existing 1918-1946 Act already had provisions for treating that governed all enrolled voters, included the limited number of indigenous enrolments (enrolled as a consequence of miltary service and other narrow circumstances). As far as treating went, all Australians were held to the same law before and after the 1962 Act. See sections 156 to 158 of the Act here [2]

The 1962 Act was entirely concerned with enrolment of indigenous Australians who had previously been excluded from enrolment. The 1962 Act gave indigenous Australians the right to enrol to vote but at the same time added an offence of inducing indigenous Australians to enrol to vote. There was no law against inducing non-indigenous Australians to enrol to vote. Multiple historians have characterised this as "it was an offence to encourage indigenous Australians to enrol to vote". I sourced one historian, Dr Blake Singley, and here's another from an Australian Government website - https://aiatsis.gov.au/explore/right-vote

The Commonwealth Electoral Act was amended in 1962 to give all Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander adults the right to vote in federal elections ... The new Act also made encouraging Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander adults to enrol an offence. This unusual situation remained in effect until 1984 when voting was made compulsory for all Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander adults in line with the rest of the nation

If you revert the reversion, I'll add the second source with a suitable quote. Stuart hc (talk) 10:02, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi User:Stuart hc, see the actual text of the act here: http://classic.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/num_act/cea1962311962260/. S4 bans bribery of Indigenous voters, S5 bans treating of Indigenous voters, and s6 and s7 ban undue influence against Indigenous voters. These are carbon copies of the principal act which bans the same for non-Indigenous voters: https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C1918A00027. e.g. s156 relating to bribery. Omitting this context misrepresents the act. ITBF (talk) 10:21, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Your statements seem to equate "vote" and "enrol" - they are very different things. Enrolment is where an eligible person shows proof of name, age and residence to get their name placed on the electoral roll, an administrative list held by the federal electoral office. Enrolment cannot occur during an election (after "writs are issued" in the terminology of the Electoral Act) i.e. after the annoucement of an election and before the election is over, a period that can last three months. The enrolment list is only opened again after the election is over. Voting is where someone whose name has been previously placed on the enrolment list attends a polling place on the day of the election to cast their vote in secret (or votes by postal ballot when allowed which is also a secret vote). If you disagee, please cite a source that states "vote" and "enrol" can be considered equivalent in the Australian electoral system.
The 1962 amendment makes no provision against voting, as all the provisions against bribery and undue influence for voting were already coverd by the 1918-1949 Act as I already stated above with the reference to sections 156 to 158 (and covered both indigenous and non-indigenous voters equally).
The 1962 amendment only make provisions against bribery, undue influence, inducement etc for enrolments of indigenous Australians who are not enrolled. For example

5. Section one hundred and fifty-seven of the Principal Act is amended by adding at the end thereof the words "or the supply of meat, drink, entertainment or transport with a view to influencing enrolment, or refraining from enrolment, as an elector by an aboriginal native of Australia"

Your statement "These are carbon copies of the principal act which bans the same for non-Indigenous voters" is wrong for two reasons:
  • The 1918-1949 Act's provisions against bribery and undue influence is universal - it applies to all Australian voters including indigenous voters. The 1918-1949 Act does not limit these provisions to non-indigenous voters. If you disagree, please quote the text of the 1918-1949 Act which states it is limited to non-indigenous voters.
  • The new 1962 amendments to sections 156 through 158 are not "carbon copies" since they make no mention of "vote" or "voting" - they are concerned only with enrolments. They introduce new offences against bribery, undue influence and inducement (encouragement) merely for enrolment. There was (and has never been) any provision against enrolment for non-indigenous Australians.
Stuart hc (talk) 07:56, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I've undone the reversion as there was no response to my requests above for sources that contradict the sources I quoted regarding the questions of 'vote' and 'enrol'. As a separate edit I've also added an extra source and quotations in the article as discussed above. Stuart hc (talk) 02:02, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Mabel Freer

On 21 January 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Mabel Freer, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Mabel Freer (pictured) was deported from Australia because she could not speak Italian? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mabel Freer. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Mabel Freer), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

-- RoySmith (talk) 12:02, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hook update
Your hook reached 18,989 views (1,582.4 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of January 2023 – nice work!

talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:27, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

DYK for Paul Freeman (communist)

On 11 February 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Paul Freeman (communist), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Paul Freeman became one of the few Westerners interred at the Kremlin Wall Necropolis, following his death in an experimental propeller-driven Soviet railcar? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Paul Freeman (communist). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Paul Freeman (communist)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 00:02, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
Valentine Logue is a very good page. Well done! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 15:52, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion
.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 19:57, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

request
that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

talk) 03:05, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

hello

Could you help me to wikify this article from wikinews in English from title end 42--Jusaset (talk) 07:00, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Próspero Cahuantzi

request
that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

talk) 10:03, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

On 30 June 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Simon Crean, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 04:31, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Rodger Page

On 6 July 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Rodger Page, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Rodger Page was called out of retirement in 1947 to officiate at the double wedding of two Tongan princes? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Rodger Page. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Rodger Page), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 00:03, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Protector of slaves

request
that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

talk) 12:02, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

DYK for Barcroft Boake (poet)

On 13 August 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Barcroft Boake (poet), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Barcroft Boake, the author of one of Australia's most anthologised poems, hanged himself with a stockwhip a few months after it was published? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Barcroft Boake (poet). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Barcroft Boake (poet)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Z1720 (talk) 00:03, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Mary-Louise McLaws

On 14 August 2023,

[majestic titan] 22:36, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Usage of image in Big John Dodo article

Hi User:Dwkaminski - thanks for starting the DYK review. I probably should have dropped you a line instead of just reverting - I think the issue is that I originally uploaded a higher-resolution image, which was then reduced by a bot. The bot automatically tags the older (higher-res) version of the file as needing speedy deletion. So the issue isn't with the image itself not meeting fair use criteria, it's just that you can't have a higher-res image hosted on Wikipedia. The tag should disappear in a couple days once the older version is deleted. ITBF (talk) 02:46, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I don't believe that is the issue. Take a look at Commons:When to use the PD-Art tag - section 3 "This does not apply to photographs of 3D works of art". Either way, the image should be in Wikimedia Commons, not wikipedia. Recommend to remove from article. Dwkaminski (talk) 11:54, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AIDC

I feel a bit guilty; someone has given me credit for the excellent work you did on the AIDC page. See my talk page. Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 09:50, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks haha. Hate to say it, but probably one of the driest articles I've ever written. It just kept popping up in sources, so thought it needed more than a redirect. ITBF (talk) 11:43, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Protector of slaves

Hello, ITBF. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Protector of slaves
".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission
and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at

this link
. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 12:18, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Big John Dodo

On 23 September 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Big John Dodo, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Lord McAlpine commissioned 100 heads from Big John Dodo? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Big John Dodo. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Big John Dodo), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

PMC(talk) 00:02, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I’m working through the Good Article process for Anna Burke (Talk:Anna Burke/GA1), I was wondering if you knew when that image was from? My understanding is that it’s from 2008 as the website it’s from says the information is from 2008. GraziePrego (talk) 01:58, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I can't say for certain, but I would suggest it's from much earlier in her career - compare this video of Burke presiding as deputy speaker from 2008 where she is visibly older than the photo and has a different hair colour https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CKF1Xjw_nt4. The website was last updated 2008 but they don't specify the dates photos were taken. ITBF (talk) 02:11, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I made sure to give the cardboard Kevin incident a mention in the article :)
I agree about the photo- my suspicion is then that it's from her first election in 1998 but there's no information to say for sure. GraziePrego (talk) 03:18, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Good haha! I often just use the caption "undated photo" in instances like that, but if it's in the infobox it doesn't necessarily need a caption. ITBF (talk) 03:46, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew Bartlett

Hi @

WP:BLP. A source is needed for every sentence. scope_creepTalk 11:01, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

@ITBF: The stuff hasn't been sourced since 2016 when it was put. It is well past the date since it's needed to be removed. scope_creepTalk 11:04, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
User:scope_creep you reverted my edit adding a source, and the existing content you deleted has three sources already. You can delete unsourced content, but please check what you're actually removing. ITBF (talk) 11:06, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I will take a look at it. Two seconds. scope_creepTalk 11:23, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, your right. Thanks for adding sources. That is ideal. scope_creepTalk 11:26, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ITBF. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of people expelled from Australian legislatures
".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion
. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 03:56, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Precious anniversary

Precious
Four years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:32, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, ITBF. Thank you for your work on

page curation process
, had the following comments:

Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 14:34, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for the amazing AFL photo!!

And happy holidays!!

Cheers Buckshot06 (talk) 03:59, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No worries - thanks to the original uploader User:Hansmuller! There's a couple more in commons:Category:Inauguration of William Richard Tolbert, 20th President of Liberia, 1976, but not quite sure where/if they fit in. ITBF (talk) 05:24, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:James Matthews (ship)

request
that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

talk) 09:06, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Edit war

I made a discussion. You didn't. And yet you mark me as edit warring? Seriously. Take it to the talk page. I've dealt with every single one of your points. You don't understand the LoC site; you're 100% wrong about what the photograph's original colours are, and you didn't bother to check if a crop of the sepia image existed.

I've been working with old photos for 10 years. I know some things. There's a reason I have 8.8% of all featured pictures (and that's only counting images I personally restored, nothing I merely nominated.

Kind of annoyed I spent literal days restoring an image, doing all the documentation the old image lacked, and then only to have you come by a week later and edit war to use the unrestored, misleadingly desaturated image.

FPs. 17:26, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Concern regarding
Draft:Moses Havini

request
that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

talk) 06:05, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Possible split

There seems to be support to split Earhart’s vanishing to a separate article. I think one correction should be done: the article should be titled “Disappearance of Amelia Earhart AND FRED NOONAN” (emphasis added). Even the recent news on the sonar discovery treated him as an afterthought. It wasn’t one person who was lost, it was two. 92.17.192.24 (talk) 20:24, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Russell Brereton

request
that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

talk) 12:08, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Maurice Blackburn, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

false positive, you can report it to my operator
. Thanks,
talk) 15:19, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

request
that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

talk) 14:06, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply
]