Search results
Appearance
Did you mean: User_talk:jguk js language change.jpg
The page "User talk:Jguk/js/language-change.js" does not exist. You can click on "User talk:Jguk/js/language-change.js" to create the page directly, or you may request that it be created, but consider checking the search results below to see whether the topic is already covered.
- Wikipedia:Verifiability/temp for a good summary of our policy. Happy editing, jguk 22:56, 10 January 2006 (UTC) Hello - an empty talk page is usually a good...62 KB (5,901 words) - 20:55, 25 June 2022
- involving User:Jguk and date notation, I thought you would be interested in a new arbitration request that has been lodged, again regarding User:Jguk and date...65 KB (10,123 words) - 14:20, 24 June 2022
- arbitration or at least mediation is required. I honestly do not believe Jguk understands or cares about NPOV. Slrubenstein | Talk 15:14, 14 May 2005 (UTC)...150 KB (22,659 words) - 15:25, 5 March 2023
- be found on the Wikimedia UK page on Wikimedia Meta-Wiki. Kind regards, jguk 19:10, 15 November 2005 (UTC) BTW, was that you who reformatted the WMUK...22 KB (3,224 words) - 02:58, 27 March 2023
- User talk:Rich Farmbrough/Archive/2010 December (section Auto link foreign language translations of articles)Rich Farmbrough, 14:43, 19 December 2010 (UTC). Could you implement my idea? http://m.jguk.org/2010/11/wikipedia-auto-link-article.html Now3d (talk) 20:18, 12 December...141 KB (18,748 words) - 11:58, 25 June 2022
- User talk:OwenX/Archive 5 (section monobook.js)from their userpage should be blocked. I oppose the idea wholeheartedly, jguk 22:12, 5 January 2006 (UTC) Thanks. That guy's edits have been bugging me...41 KB (5,160 words) - 22:49, 15 May 2022
- cricket-related pages would take place (so put it on your watchlist). Happy editing! jguk 23:11, 14 January 2006 (UTC) Hi- Many thanks for formating my table so professionally...43 KB (6,172 words) - 18:10, 5 April 2022
- on Sortan. Cheers, Sam Korn (smoddy) 13:38, 25 February 2006 (UTC) Also, Jguk stated on his talk page that he no longer checks it, and that if you want...64 KB (8,127 words) - 12:07, 3 April 2023
- do so - before then, I think the old format should remain. All the best. jguk 15:49, 4 December 2006 (UTC) Good to see you unblocked and going right back...48 KB (6,711 words) - 15:54, 9 March 2023
- call your attention to the following: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Jguk#Optional styles Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Sortan#Preferred_styles...396 KB (17,595 words) - 13:44, 13 March 2024
- should just delete that code and add {{subst:js|User:Gimmetrow/fixRefs.js}} to your monobook, so when I change the code again you'll have the updates. Gimmetrow...103 KB (14,968 words) - 10:11, 24 March 2022
- another RfC - but that does not mean the expired one should be revived. jguk 11:38, 11 Dec 2004 (UTC) Hey, don't get depressed. And I agree with you that...84 KB (13,395 words) - 21:30, 22 February 2023
- inter al., the Jguk arbitration case (although I'm not altogether in accord with the suggestion that one should, for instance, change BE spellings to...188 KB (26,315 words) - 03:47, 10 March 2023
- references be changed to "ROC". He has been trying to do this, annoying a lot of people by his continued persistence, for a number of weeks now, jguk 21:07,...149 KB (22,827 words) - 05:08, 9 April 2023
- consider CE to be a valid epoch. Per Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Jguk#Final_decision: "Both the BCE/CE era names and the BC/AD era names are acceptable...52 KB (7,573 words) - 09:53, 28 March 2022
- that the Christian point of view is represented fairly. Please comment on Jguk's most recent actions [3], [4]. It seems to me that he is destroying what...174 KB (26,110 words) - 11:11, 1 March 2022
- 2005 (UTC) Please note that I have disputed the neutrality of this article. Jguk reverted my NPOV template, claiming that the NPOV dispute is just a personal...159 KB (24,435 words) - 23:28, 13 March 2023
- User talk:Trilobite/archive (section User languages)changes in the article, and on fast-moving articles it isn't practical to discuss what seem like smaller points on the talk pages. Kind regards, jguk...223 KB (33,017 words) - 01:58, 20 February 2023
- User talk:Rick Block/Archive2005 (section HD change)probably best to let the ArbCom case rest a while before going for adminship, jguk 3 July 2005 18:12 (UTC) The upgrade came and went without any automatic generation...262 KB (40,119 words) - 15:54, 23 June 2022
- contributor. See Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Jguk Also, in one of the articles you changed, Badi III, you corrected the spelling and grammar of...362 KB (46,486 words) - 07:47, 16 March 2023
- an easier time getting passed. The last dispute I saw was with Jguk and Johnny, Jguk and Whiteknight seemed to handle the situation just fine, without