User talk:Jo-Jo Eumerus

This is Jo-Jo Eumerus's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81Auto-archiving period: 7 days

This section is pinned and will not be automatically archived.

• Cerro Panizos
• Socompa
• Licancabur
• Llullaillaco
• Sabancaya
• Misti
• Macauley Island, needs prose cleanup
• Aucanquilcha, needs a rewrite with Google Scholar
• Cerro Guacha, needs a rewrite with Google Scholar
• El Laco, needs a rewrite with Google Scholar
• Lastarria, needs a rewrite with Google Scholar
• Purico complex, needs a rewrite with Google Scholar
• Aguas Calientes caldera, needs a rewrite (and some mergers) with Google Scholar
• Pastos Grandes, needs a rewrite with Google Scholar or shortened.
• Mount Okmok
• Mount Aniakchak
• Candlemas Island
• Laguna Verde (Bolivia), needs expansion with talkpage sauces

Most of 'em need a root-and-branch rewrite first, though. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 17:38, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I apologzie for bothering you. but I could not make the "ping" work. Anyway, I answered your question about source of PDF file for NM. Bur Mines Miner. Res. Bull. It is Link to PDF of entire Bulletin 131. Paul H. (talk) 03:34, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jo-Jo. This article has had a sources spot check, but not - so far as I can see - a source review, if you follow me. Any chance you could oblige? Thanks. Gog the Mild (talk) 10:54, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jo-Jo Eumerus, could you possibly perform a source review on the AM DB9 featured article candidacy? Best (don't feel obliged),  750h+ | Talk  14:02, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It will also need a source to text fidelity spot check and a over-close paraphrasing review. Cheers. Gog the Mild (talk) 14:04, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe, although getting some reviews from others in first might be better before asking for spotchecks and the like. Oxford Mail is described as a "tabloid", which makes me wonder about whether it's a "high-quality reliable source". Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 17:07, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind, did this one as well. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 17:53, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jo-Jo Eumerus. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{

ygm}} template.CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 14:14, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, File:Test.mp3, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other test edits you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by