User talk:Johnbod/39

In the discussion that Ceoil said was over, I didn't question that Princesse was her title, nor that it even mattered. What I don't like is the English "The" attached to a title in French, - Princesse de Broglie would be fine, Portrait of the Princesse of Broglie would be fine, but I dislike The Princesse de Broglie. Just to make you understand. The discussion was declared over. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:00, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Convicted book-thieves, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. UnitedStatesian (talk) 14:33, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi John, do you have any other captures of this - would like to include in the main boxwood article, if a little less blurred. I think it might be bothersome, policy wise, if I was to use one of the images from their website. Ceoil (talk) 18:25, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, any other versions would have been worse! I'm a poor photographer with a very cheap camera, and apparently very shaky hands. I was in the room at Waddesdon Manor this came from on Friday, btw! Johnbod (talk) 18:32, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm. Seems like I may have to pay a visit to the BM shortly, maybe even before x-mass ;) Re Waddesdon Manor, lucky you, look at the article it seems very impressive and Chardin always struck me as underappreciated, at least in English. Ceoil (talk) 18:36, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ceoil Ask and ye shall receive. Is this sufficiently better? John, you asked me to tell you when I uploaded them, the ones that came out OK or nearly OK are in commons:Category:Photographs by Jonathan Cardy at the British Museum Jonathan Cardy (talk) 13:28, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, many thanks Jonathan! Nice shot, have added to Gothic boxwood miniature. Ceoil (talk) 17:33, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Johnbod. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It was good and interesting to meet you last night and don't worry you haven't offended the hurricane community. :P Jason Rees (talk) 15:17, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, and thanks for coming! A very enjoyable evening, I think for most. Johnbod (talk) 15:52, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Londinium (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Isotype

Prehistoric Ireland (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Periwinkle

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:17, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Aegean art, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Intaglio (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

In the article on Transfer Printing (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transfer_printing) you added the line "Usually several different transfer sections were needed for each piece." However, none of the two provided references (Honey 6-7 and Savage 30) make mention of this. Would you be able to add a citation for this fact? 128.84.126.23 (talk) 21:38, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Some time, but the two photos of patterns both make this pretty clear. Johnbod (talk) 03:23, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"And the angel said unto them, Fear not: for, behold,

I bring you good tidings of great joy, which shall be to all people.

For unto you is born this day in the city of David a Saviour, which is Christ the Lord."

Luke 2:10-11 (King James Version)

Ozzie10aaaa (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas.

This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove.

Spread the cheer by adding {{Subst:Xmas4}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 13:30, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Johnbod - I have redone

Ok, I'll comment at the merge section. Johnbod (talk) 17:50, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Angelica and Medoro, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Villa Valmarana (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

	Gothic Seasons Greetings
	Wishing you all the best for x-mass, hope it is a time of cheer, and thanks for all the guidance and help over the year. Ceoil (talk) 18:26, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

		Happy Saturnalia
		Wishing you and yours a Happy Holiday Season, from the horse and bishop person. May the year ahead be productive and troll-free. Ealdgyth - Talk 17:00, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dear

What is clear, because you've said so yourself, is that you don't know much at all, and can't understand the term Viking. Yet rather than actually attempt to find anything out, you waste people's time by launching a string of move requests. It would be a very positive development if you stopped doing this. Johnbod (talk) 19:56, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Replied here:

talk) 20:31, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

ϢereSpielChequers is wishing you Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's Solstice or Christmas, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hanukkah, Lenaia, Festivus or even the Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{

subst:User:WereSpielChequers/Dec18a

}}~~~~ to your friends' talk pages.

ϢereSpielChequers 13:54, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May a serene and snowy Christmas and New Years' await you. –♠Vami_IV†♠ 01:37, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please explain why you removed the infobox from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adoration_of_the_Shepherds_(Cariani)? What's wrong with it? Thanks, Laboramus (talk) 04:42, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

	Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year
	Hi Johnbod, I wish you and your family a very Merry Christmas and a very Happy and Prosperous New Year, Thanks for all your help and thanks for all your contributions to the 'pedia,    –Davey2010 Merry Christmas / Happy New Year 14:40, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

is wishing you a Merry Christmas (quite possibly a White Christmas

).

Have a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year

This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove.

Spread the

links

in this message!

— 20:07, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

FWiW Bzuk (talk) 01:16, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

		Seasonal Greetings and Good Wishes
		Seasonal greetings for 2018, and best wishes for 2019 to all who continue to fight for good practice and higher standards in building this great encyclopedia. Brianboulton (talk) 11:07, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The picture for the article Nativity at Night is to go on the Main Page tomorrow, and the accompanying text is essentially what you wrote in December 2009. That includes "It is a small painting presumably made for private devotional use," I have raised at WP:ERRORS my disquiet with the encyclopaedia making a presumption: is there a source attached to this? Is the presumption addressed in Campbell p232/8 ? Kevin McE (talk) 12:42, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes of course it fucking is! When WP:ERRORS gets into art history the introduction of mistakes inevitably follows. But at least thank you for actually letting the outside world know what the errors crew are up to for once. So unusual. Johnbod (talk) 12:47, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What is the need for the attitude? The article, and extract, read as though the reference is to it being derived from the van der Goes work. I don't know what dealings you have had with people at ERRORS before that makes you so bad tempered about it, but I am trying to ensure that mistakes, and unsourced presumptions, are avoided. Perhaps you would like to make clear that Campbell publishes this presumption, maybe with a quote for the benefit of those who don't have a copy of The Fifteenth Century Netherlandish Paintings to hand. Kevin McE (talk) 13:02, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

	Season's greetings!
	I hope this holiday season is festive and fulfilling and filled with love and kindness, and that 2019 will be safe, successful and rewarding...keep hope alive....Modernist (talk) 15:54, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

	Austral season's greetings
	Tuck into this! We've made about three of these in the last few days for various festivities. Supermarkets are stuffed with cheap berries. Season's greetings! Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 22:02, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

On 25 December 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Adoration of the Shepherds (Cariani), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Adoration of the Shepherds (detail pictured) by Giovanni Cariani seems to have been started as a Rest on the Flight into Egypt before the subject was changed by adding shepherds? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Adoration of the Shepherds (Cariani). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Adoration of the Shepherds (Cariani)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 00:01, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

	Holiday Cheer!
	To Johnbod, best wishes to you and yours for a joyous holiday season and a happy & healthy 2019. Ewulp (talk) 01:30, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2019!

Hello Johnbod, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2019. Happy editing, talk) 05:49, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply ] Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Redrose64 🌹 (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the cheer by adding {{

subst:Xmas6

}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

--Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 12:32, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Since you participated in the rfc earlier in the year, I am letting you know of another rfc to merge List of cryptids. Which ever way the wind blows you are welcome to join in. Fyunck(click) (talk) 07:53, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. It looks like you're confused with the use of the term "Persian". The history and culture of Iran is not limited to the ancient Persian Empires, the

I'm not at all confused, though I think you may be as to the usual usage of these terms in English (which confuses many Iranians - this guy for one) and the way Wikipedia categories work. You seem to be trying to carry a distinction between "Persian" as an ethnic sub-group of "Iranian" back into ancient history, which just doesn't reflect usage in English-language

WP:RS, where Persian and Iranian are generally synonymous, except for linguistics or when say Medes are being discussed. The Parthian Empire is certainly Persian - as the Greeks at the time called it, and Western writers have done ever since. So no, if you continue to make erroneous edits, I will continue to revert them. Johnbod (talk) 20:52, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

I don’t see how this issue is relevant, in any way, to what that IP had been doing on the Persian miniature article. While Iran was entirely referred to as “Persia” in the Western World, I’m pretty sure the distinction between the three founding tribes and empires of Iran was made both by the ancient Greek writers and by later western writers on many occasions. Moreover, in present-day English terminology, the use of the term “Iran” has taken over the archaic term of “Persia”, in terms of topics concerning both modern Iran and classical Iran. There are loads of English-language RS already used on the English Wikipedia that clearly recognize the distinction between the two terms. The fact that you do acknowledge the exceptions of using the term “Persian” instead of “Iranian” in terms of linguistics and certain parts of the Iranian history, and that we‘re actually talking about two distinct categories by the names “Iranian culture” and “Persian culture”, illustrates how relevant this concern is. Perhaps more editors should be involved in this discussion.
—Rye-96 (talk) 05:31, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Probably - certainly there has been movement on the matter in recent decades, since the Shah expanded the English usage of "Iranian" beyond liguistic and ethnic matters, but it is just wrong to say that "Persian" is no longer used. Judg8ing by your edit summaries, you seem a poor judge of relevance. Johnbod (talk) 12:31, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm pretty sure the Shah didn't write all of these documents himself, Johnbod. The decree on the official name of Iran was announced in March 1935, but as you can see, the term "Iran" already existed in English (obviously in the national sense) prior to that. It's just that a general word choice preference took place. "Iran" is a well-established English term and its usage does indeed go beyond ethnic and linguistic contexts, which themselves do matter for a category on culture and cannot be disregarded. Nobody's rejecting the use of the term "Persian" altogether; that's not what the point is. The English (and Ancient Greek) usages of "Persian" vary, like that of "Iranian". We're talking about what gives us two distinct categories by the names of "Persian culture" and "Iranian culture" and what each one of them would have to cover precisely regarding the varying definitions of the terms. If you think we can't do that, then the two categories should be merged, since you're insisting that they're all synonymous.
"...the usual usage of these terms in English (which confuses many Iranians..." - "...you seem a poor judge of relevance." — I don't understand that language, btw. I think I could report it. I'm glad you managed to read my edit summaries, at least, cause I failed to see yours on multiple occasions.
—Rye-96 (talk) 22:58, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The sensible broad distinction, which we have had for many years here, is to use "Persian" for ancient and older historical matters, and "Iranian" for modern ones, with fuzzy borderlines and a deal of overlap. That is the china shop into which you have charged. Godd luck with your reporting! Johnbod (talk) 00:59, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Using "Persian" for relevant ancient historical matters is exactly what I'm suggesting we should do, Johnbod. That being said, the Median and Parthian empires were not "Persian" and this is what we know from both classical Greek and modern English resources, and the term "Iranian" does also apply to ancient matters in English resources on many occasions.
—Rye-96 (talk) 14:49, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Die Zeit, die Tag und Jahre macht

Happy 2019

-

begin it with music and memories

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:20, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please check out "Happy" once more, for a smile, and sharing (a Nobel Peace Prize), and resolutions. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:25, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Landshut Wedding, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hedwig Jagiellon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:30, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

On 12 January 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Shepherd with a Flute, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Shepherd with a Flute has had his shirt changed, and is now attributed to Titian rather than Giorgione? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Shepherd with a Flute. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Shepherd with a Flute), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 00:03, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

On 15 January 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Esther before Ahasuerus, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that after various changes to Tintoretto's Esther before Ahasuerus (shown) from the 1540s onwards, the painting now has two figures of Haman? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Esther before Ahasuerus. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Esther before Ahasuerus), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex Shih (talk) 00:01, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Azeri style

Could you check it? Seriously it sounds dubious to me. --

Yes, probably Johnbod (talk) 15:50, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It's really odd. How these Timurid buildings (

talk) 16:47, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Martin Schongauer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Snyder (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:42, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, Johnbod, you are right, this item is possibly more suitable for the article Filigree. Regards, Chris OxfordChris Oxford (talk) 19:54, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Dennis Bratland. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Missal of Silos that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.

See [1]. BTW, I do template the regulars when that’s all of my time they deserve. Dennis Bratland (talk) 19:34, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Would you please go to
  WP:TALK etc. If you can't make corrections to articles without flinging insults, perhaps I'm not the one who should stick to something else. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 19:45, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Well someone else has done so.

WP:OWN on a page I last made small edits to in 2013??? It was a remarkably careless mistake and I pointed this out. It doesn't seem to have dented your over-confidence one bit. Happy trails! Johnbod (talk) 22:34, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

That's false. You did not merely call the mistake careless, though even that is an unnecessary commentary on contributors rather than content. You insulted me directly with vulgar, schoolboy name calling, a violation of

WP:OWNBEHAVIOR policy. I know you know all this, and I also know editors with many years experience and FA credits are deaf to it. It's extremely unlikely you will be held accountable for this kind of behavior, which is why it never gets better. Guys like you have made Wikipedia notorious for obnoxious gatekeeping.

Your history shows you have a pattern of escalating corrections into unnecessary conflict, both when you correct others and when others correct you. I know a lot of people think trying to shame and abuse anyone who makes a mistake improves quality, but evidence shows it doesn't. It creates defensiveness, and conditions editors to resist admitting error. It trains everyone to hide their mistakes, and rationalize them, rather than quickly owning up to them so we can all move on to something constructive.

This superlative sat unsourced on History of paper for 10 years until I raised this question. If I had been afraid of getting bit, I'd have left it alone and it would have remained uncited for years more, in the hands of you Wikipedia royalty. You and I will both make errors in the future, and I expect when you do, you're going to get bogged down in pointless bickering. I see your example and work to avoid being anything like that. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 22:52, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

For puzzled passers-by, I'd better explain that all I did was revert DB's removal of referenced and correct information because he had failed to read the online reference with any care at all. But clearly he is one of those people who is always in the right. Johnbod (talk) 23:07, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You fucking liar. Your edit summary was a personal attack. You are allowed to tell people to fuck off. Profanity is totally fucking fine. You are not allowed to call them motherfuckers. or "dickheads". You must think puzzled passers-by can't read a plain edit summary. What's so hard about saying "oops, sorry, I went too far"? What a fucking ego. Didn't I say you'd be deaf to this? Bye. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 23:13, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fuckety fuck fuck to you both. And thank you for pointing the way to a very interesting article. Now please shake virtual hands and bury the hatchet (but not in each other?). Randy Kryn (talk) 23:23, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What's "extremely silly" about moving the fish photo from the lead to the section about fish? A picture of a fish doesn't provide

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Visitation (Dürer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Visitation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure OWN is a fair accusation. User Tobby72 recently added another image that I did not touch, because it is relevant to the section and I guess there's enough room for it, although it's probably my personal preference that two images per section is enough. Three is pushing it. I like it when images stay neatly within their sections, and illustrate something in the corresponding text. I probably have a mild form of autism that accounts for this lol. - HappyWaldo (talk) 07:11, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Like I said, then Johnbod (talk) 16:00, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please revert my changes instead of manually removing them. It is nice to get a notification of that type of thing. Also try to assume good faith instead of... not. Thanks ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ^ᐐT₳LKᐬ 21:38, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You had left comments on the Signpost article. I would like to thank you here too for the comment. It is always insightful for writers to understand how readers are interpreting articles. A belated thank you. Regards.

Others are available: I mainly use {{

tl}} does not. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 21:05, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

Thanks both, Johnbod (talk) 00:06, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Renaissance dance, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Volta (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion

Perhaps you'd care the one sentence personal attack from this edit? Debresser (talk) 19:12, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

- missing words, but I expect the answer is no. Johnbod (talk) 19:16, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Which is precisely what happened the last time. Which is also the reason that next time I will, again, cut you no slack whatsoever. Don't want to be a friendly editor, don't expect to have an easy time. Debresser (talk) 22:00, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That doesn't seem to be an option with you - you always get your attack in first. You should track back over your own edits sometime.... Johnbod (talk) 02:05, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Johnbod. You have new messages at Serial Number 54129's talk page.
Message added 19:14, 17 February 2019 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

——SerialNumber54129 19:14, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Legacypac

Why are you reinstating the ramblings of an LTA? Natureium (talk) 19:31, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:JoseEduardoTR

Hey John, thanks for doing the appropriate tidiness to the text I wrote in the Talk:The Last Judgment (Memling) I am starting to know more about Wikipedia and I just 'thank' it in its history.

. I have a question. If you find and read this in another Talk's article, what would you do?

Keep having a wonderful week!

JoseEduardoTR (talk) 14:24, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Well, I read it. Johnbod (talk) 00:10, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

. Thanks to you. Did you read it? If so, if you would had read that text in the Talk:OK_gesture, what would you have done? – JoseEduardoTR (talk) 15:48, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for The Dead King and his Three Sons

On 19 February 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Dead King and his Three Sons, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in a story known in the Middle Ages, the sons of a dead king shoot arrows at his corpse? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Dead King and his Three Sons. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, The Dead King and his Three Sons), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Saint Sebastian Tended by Saint Irene

On 22 February 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Saint Sebastian Tended by Saint Irene, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that paintings of Saint Sebastian tended by Saint Irene (example shown) reflected the position of both Catholic and Protestant churches that people should not flee to avoid the plague? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Saint Sebastian Tended by Saint Irene. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Saint Sebastian Tended by Saint Irene), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:01, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. The Rambling Man (talk) 07:12, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Johnbod and The Rambling Man. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 17:35, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Master MZ

On 23 February 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Master MZ, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that an engraving in 1500 by Master MZ shows a woman lifting her skirts to protect or hide an owl? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Master MZ. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Master MZ), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Frog Service

hello Johnbod

Thanks for creating Frog Service. An interesting and well-written article. Intially thought it was going to be some obscure 80s band id est Aztec Camera but was delighted by the content. Well done. Dorkinglad (talk) 12:34, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I leave it for those that call themselves the official ones to provide a rating but a clear B from me.Dorkinglad (talk) 12:34, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks! Johnbod (talk) 04:10, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Philip the Shortly Described

Regarding this. I had a whole long message typed up about how I had deliberately made the original shortdesc the way it was and why that was probably the better choice. And then I had a nagging feeling and went and actually looked at the article. "D'oh!" indeed. I work mainly with Elizajacobean literature topics, with slight detours back to the late mediæval and up to the 18th century, in England. My view of "France" is, it seems, too much colored by that. So thank you for the edit with possibly the most educational value per character changed that has run across my watchlist the last few years! :) --Xover (talk) 05:53, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - I nearly sent you a message, but didn't in the end, partly because of the time it would have taken to explain the ways the dukes & duchy were & weren't exactly "French", & the exact rank/status of the dukes. Johnbod (talk) 13:44, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Mair von Landshut

On 28 February 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Mair von Landshut, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Mair von Landshut's prints (example shown) "resemble whimsical stage sets, and are endowed with an unreal character, like something from a fairy tale"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mair von Landshut. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Mair von Landshut), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:01, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Magdeburg Ivories

Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 00:03, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

Done. You'd think being 950+ years old was enough .... Image first published in 1857. Johnbod (talk) 01:29, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Special Barnstar
	This is to thank you for your hundreds of high-quality art articles with equally stunning images that are so appreciated in the DYK column on the main page. It's a pleasure to promote your work again and again! Best, Yoninah (talk) 02:26, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks! Johnbod (talk) 02:44, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Magdeburg Ivories

On 7 March 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Magdeburg Ivories, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the 16 plaques called the Magdeburg Ivories (one pictured) were probably made around 968 to decorate an unknown cathedral fixture destroyed in the next century? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Magdeburg Ivories. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Magdeburg Ivories), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:01, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What's your problem?

I accidentally clicked a wrong link and instantly corrected my mistake. What the hell is your problem? For what reason are you calling me out by name in an edit summary? What the heck did I ever do to you? --Jayron32 23:26, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I hadn't seen the 2nd edit when I was editing, just your first reversion. Johnbod (talk) 23:27, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It's all good man, carry on. Mistakes happen. Toodles.--Jayron32 23:30, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Johnbod. You have new messages at Template:Did you know nominations/campaign announcement.
Message added 13:38, 10 March 2019 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

csdnew 13:38, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

"jeez"

Why so patronising, Johnbod? It's not the first time either, although it's a while ago now, and I have other things on my mind than finding diffs right now. Hmm? There's absolutely no need for it. I'm not even that fussed about civility, but off-the-cuff, gratuitous bollocks like that on a Sunday evening – I'd love to know. Nortonius (talk) 21:42, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Turf War (Banksy) at AfD

Thanks for participating in the ongoing AfD. Sure, the stub was pathetic, but doesn't mean the topic is not notable. I'm working to add more detail to Turf War (Banksy), so do you mind revising the discussion and sourcing again soon? ---Another Believer _(Talk) 21:32, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Did you know nominations/campaign announcement

Will you still be willing to address the issues I raised recently? Those are the only things left before the nomination is approved.

csdnew 00:41, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

Sure - on it soon. Johnbod (talk) 03:43, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Presidential campaign announcements in the United States

On 17 March 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Presidential campaign announcements in the United States, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a U.S. presidential candidate making a campaign announcement is said to "throw one's hat in the ring", after a boxing metaphor popularized by the Theodore Roosevelt 1912 presidential campaign? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Presidential campaign announcements in the United States), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 01:52, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Frog Service

On 18 March 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Frog Service, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Josiah Wedgwood "was very unwilling to disfigure" his Frog Service with "this reptile" (pictured), but Catherine the Great insisted it appear on all 944 pieces? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Frog Service. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Frog Service), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:34, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I knew this was a winner! Congratulations! Yoninah (talk) 01:44, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! That's amazing! Johnbod (talk) 17:46, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Swedish treeline

Just now is my first time to log in since making that T:DYK edit, so I couldn't do anything, but you perhaps noticed that someone else tweaked it. When I made this edit, the latest revision said Global warming is likely to have an effect on the country's biodiversity, with the treeline moving further north and to higher altitudes, and forests replacing tundra. You need to direct your anger at whoever wrote the article, because altitude and latitude both match what was written there.

Moreover, if I'd looked at the source, I would have pulled the article entirely: it's based on an article from a self-published source. This website's about page says nothing about authors or reviewers, and the article is anonymous. Why am I supposed to trust that they interpreted their sources properly? An article written by an uncredentialled or anonymous person is reliable if reviewed by experts or published in an expert-run forum, and an article written by an expert is reliable, but an uncredentialled or anonymous person has no reputation and cannot reliably self-publish anything. Therefore, if you should do anything with your anger, you really ought to direct it at whoever decided that this unreliable source was acceptable. I expect the information's accurate (obviously, global warming means that the locations of minimum temperatures will expand), but that doesn't mean that we're free to use any source that says so. Nyttend (talk) 11:39, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you think I'm angry? But this drive-by tinkering with stuff on the main page is a bad thing, & we are getting much too much of it. Your reply just just makes more clear the unhelpful nature of your edit. As I surmised, you hadn't then looked at anything, on your own admission. Johnbod (talk) 21:42, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Meynnart Wewyck Tudor portraits

Did you see Painting of mother of King Henry VII revealed as oldest large-scale portrait of an English woman and this? I've added it to Commons and updated the info on the Lockey copy there. Wewyck is all over the web once one knows to look for him. I have the Burlington Magazine article, and I'm headed down the rabbithole, adding bits to Wikidata as I go. - PKM (talk) 12:04, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting - will you do the bio? And there's Artists of the Tudor court, Best, Johnbod (talk) 13:17, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'll likely do Artists of the Tudor court, unless you want to do it. Not sure about more than that. (Feel free to do any of this if you like...I'm really deep in Wikidata these days.) - PKM (talk) 19:28, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Added File:Henry VII of England Society of Antiquaries.jpg to Commons, with new attribution to Wewyck. - PKM (talk) 20:54, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'll give you first shot, Cheers, Johnbod (talk) 21:14, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Getting somewhere: http://vocab.getty.edu/page/ulan/500336012. - PKM (talk) 00:20, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Meynnart Wewyck linked, locked, and loaded. Also updated Artists of the Tudor court - more payment records. Interesting that the last recorded payment to "olde" Wewyck was the year of the first payment to Hornebolte. Comments, additions, and typo fixing welcome. - PKM (talk) 22:01, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Precious anniversary

Precious

Seven years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:14, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Gerda! Johnbod (talk) 09:22, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Venetian Renaissance architecture

On 27 April 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Venetian Renaissance architecture, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that most major Venetian Renaissance architects (villa by Palladio pictured) were not natives of the city, or even of the Republic of Venice? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Venetian Renaissance architecture. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Venetian Renaissance architecture), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 00:01, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject

.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Assessments

Thank you ever so much! Seems no one does that anymore, and doing it myself didn't seem right. It was so kind of you to take the time. Best regards, SandyGeorgia (Talk) 14:38, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Happy to! Doing a DYK is one sure way to get them - but they tend to be too grudging, imo. Few of the assessors seem to have read the actual grade criteria recently. Glad to see you're back n'busy - but sorry if it's taken the crisis to bring you back. Makes Brexit Britain look like a trivial matter (which arguably it is). Johnbod (talk) 14:44, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It's a sad situation, and reading the daily news can be hard with so much suffering ... if I disappear again, you'll know it's because I decided keeping up with all that negativity was too much for me! Best, SandyGeorgia (Talk) 14:47, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A goat for you!

Thank you for your contributions to the glossary of architecture!

Piparsveinn (talk) 19:27, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

2024

Die Zeit, die Tag und Jahre macht

Happy New Year

2024

Like 2019, remember? -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:34, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]