User talk:JulieMay54

Thanks Lourdes for your assistance. This is a draft article which I obviously put in the wrong place. Thanks for the assistance. Hopefully I can lose my training wheels soon. JulieMay54 (talk) 00:10, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article

criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 16:21, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply

The article Nessa Carey you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Nessa Carey for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 16:41, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for your review of this article - it has been a valuable learning experience. JulieMay54 (talk) 05:39, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi JulieMay54,

I was just checking the citations on the Felicity Goodyear-Smith article and came across these references:

Goodyear-Smith, F; Arroll, B (Oct 1999). Literature review on rehabilitation after arthroscopic knee surgery for meniscal damage. Final Report to the Accident Rehabilitation and Compensation Insurance Corporation. p. 46.

Goodyear-Smith, F; Arroll, B (Mar 2001). Recommendations regarding imaging and referrals with respect to acute and chronic low back pain. Report to the Accident Rehabilitation and Compensation Insurance Corporation. 57p.

Goodyear-Smith, F; Halliwell, J (April 2007). Recommendations regarding efficacy of anticonvulsant drugs for neuropathic pain management: Report to the Accident Compensation Corporation. Auckland. 245 pp.

I am having trouble finding them. Can you tell if they have been published and where you found them? Thanks, -- haminoon (talk) 04:00, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Haminoon, These are reports for the Accident Rehabilitation and Compensation Insurance Corporation and, as such, appear unpublished. They are listed both in Goodyear-Smith's University of Auckland Academic CV (http://www.phcris.org.au/phplib/filedownload.php?file=/elib/lib/downloaded_files/roarprofile/document/9162_cv_uoa_2014.pdf) and on her personal website. I have not sighted them myself. JulieMay54 (talk) 06:44, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

On 12 March 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Nessa Carey, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the molecular biologist Nessa Carey cites the slight figure of actress Audrey Hepburn (pictured) to illustrate the possible impacts of epigenetics? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Nessa Carey. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Nessa Carey), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Mifter (talk) 00:02, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article

criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Aircorn -- Aircorn (talk) 06:01, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply

Thanks User:Legobot I am currently travelling and may not always have internet but will try to respond as promptly as possible. JulieMay54 (talk) 06:06, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry Julie May, but I have failed the Good Article nomination. I have left a detailed explanation at the review page. If you have any questions you can ask them here or at my talk page. If you want to ask someone for a second opinion of my review I will not mind. Please don't take my comments the wrong way, I do not think your article is bad - in fact it is better than most of the articles on here - I just don't think it currently meets the GA criteria. I hope my comments have been constructive and I wish you the best in taking this article further. AIRcorn (talk) 07:25, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks User:Aircorn all useful feedback. I'm finding the GA process a valuable learning tool. I will look in detail when I'm not travelling. I found it difficult to find the right balance around the controversy so agree with what you're saying. JulieMay54 (talk) 10:02, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I used to be very involved in the GA process and agree it is great as a learning tool. You do get some variability with reviewers and I am probably a bit harder than some. If you need any help let me know and if I have time I will do what I can. AIRcorn (talk) 21:18, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

		The New Zealand Barnstar of National Merit
		Nice work on New Zealand bios. Keep it up.
		this WikiAward was given to JulieMay54 by Schwede66 on 18:50, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Julie, I've come across your new article

Firstly: the article title: no need for disambiguation as he's the only "Anthony D. Holmes" in the encyclopedia. If he did need disambiguation, a noun is preferable to an adjective, and capital letters aren't used except for proper nouns - so "(surgeon)" would have been better. I've moved it to

But Secondly: more complicated... using your sandbox to create article after article and moving them to main space produces an accidental effect of a long and irrelevant history for the article. I've done it myself once in the past and realised it doesn't work well. Looking at this I can now see that everything before 10 February 2018 is irrelevant, and confusing - it looks as if the article has been around since Jan 2016 and that you've done a huge proportion of the editing since then, which flags up

Happy editing! PamD 08:32, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• @PamD and JulieMay54: I have moved those old irrelevant edits of Anthony D. Holmes, to User:JulieMay54/sandbox2. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 09:07, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Anthony Appleyard: Thanks - I knew you'd be able to fix it! PamD 09:10, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Anthony Appleyard:and @PamD: Thanks for the advice. Ive never been sure how to manage clearing my sandbox to begin again. I will try your suggestion of using subpages. JulieMay54 (talk)

Thanks for all the photos you are uploading. Many of our country areas don't have a lot of photos available on Commons, so keep up the good work!

Kerry (talk) 05:20, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Kerry its so easy to take few photos as we travel around - country Australia has some fabulous places and people!JulieMay54 (talk)

Hello, JulieMay54. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Marguerite Evans-Galea.

The career section is a bit too promotional

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rosguill}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

_signed, Rosguill ^talk 05:45, 23 April 2019 (UTC) {{Re|Rosguill}} thank for your review. Can you please give me a little more specific guidance as to what needs to change? 110.142.122.100 (talk) 09:43, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Anthony D. Holmes (Medcial). Since you had some involvement with the Anthony D. Holmes (Medcial) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Reyk _YO! 09:42, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]