User talk:Karsan Chanda

Dear @Muninnbot:, @LazyManiik: and @RegentsPark: Ji, Is Draft:Alan Singh page fit for Wikipedia now? Because his ten references have been completed. Using all these references, help me complete Alan Singh page. -- Karsan Chanda (talk) 12:10, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Alan Singh. Thanks! ---✨LazyManiik✨ 12:51, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@LazyManiik: ^[1] ok. --Karsan Chanda (talk) 13:21, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@LazyManiik: ^[2] ok. --Karsan Chanda (talk) 13:28, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@LazyManiik: ^[3][4][5] ok. --Karsan Chanda (talk) 14:01, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dear @David notMD: Ji, Is Alan Singh page fit for Wikipedia now? Because his ten references have been completed. Using all these references, help me complete Alan Singh page. -- Karsan Chanda (talk) 13:52, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I know nothing about the topic, nor any interest in working on the article. Most of the references you added were removed as not being reliable by Wikipedia standards. Others are about the fort, but barely mention Alan Singh. David notMD (talk) 14:32, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lazy Maniik was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject

independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid

when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alan Singh and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Alan Singh, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

---✨LazyManiik✨ 12:54, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Karsan Chanda! The thread you created at the archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both talk) 19:03, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply ]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Alan Singh. Thanks! GoingBatty (talk) 03:28, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Chhuttan Lal Meena, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

SL93 (talk) 01:06, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I moved the query that you posted at Wikipedia talk:Reference desk to the place it belongs, Wikipedia:Reference desk/Humanities. (The place for questions is one of the Reference Desks themselves rather than the talk page.) Deor (talk) 17:56, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Karsan Chanda! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, When and how was the Kachwaha dynasty established?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread. See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both talk) 19:04, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply ]

@RegentsPark: Ji, Help me.^[2] -- Karsan Chanda (talk)•

@Hoary: Ji, Any article I write gets deleted immediately. That's why I want help from all of you. -- Karsan Chanda (talk) 04:45, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Wikipedia:Teahouse#Laxman_Meena. -- Hoary (talk) 06:51, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

RJP is a political regional party.^[1][2] -- Karsan Chanda (talk) 13:02, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have corrected your unterminated reference. --David Biddulph (talk) 08:16, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You are continuously adding unreliable sources like blogs for history pages related to History of Amber and Jaipur. Most of these sources are removed, please see

@Sajaypal007: Ji, See this page and tell if all its sources are correct?^[1][2] -- Karsan Chanda (talk) 09:54, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Dhundhar. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Thank you. Sajaypal007 (talk) 04:32, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Sajaypal007: Ji, Check it out and help us.^[1] -- Karsan Chanda (talk) 02:35, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Karsan Chanda

Thank you for creating Shiwar.

I'd suggest that you look for the village in https://censusindia.gov.in/pca/Searchdata.aspx and add the demographic data from there.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:23, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@MPGuy2824: Ji, Ok. -- Karsan Chanda (talk) 05:39, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've noticed that you've added CPI as the third party to the infoboxes of the Rajasthan election articles. This would be all right if they were the party which got the third-highest number of seats, but this isn't true for most of these elections. The general consensus in Wikipedia:WikiProject Indian politics is that it is ok to have the top three parties. If you want to add the CPI total, then please make sure to add all the parties that have won more seats than them too, and make sure they are in descending order of the seats won. Thanks. I also suggest that you join Wikipedia:WikiProject Indian politics. You seem to be interested in the articles that come under their scope. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 02:08, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@MPGuy2824: Ji, I have not added CPI as a third party but as a Left party. -- Karsan Chanda (talk) 02:58, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, but it seems odd to have a party which has just one seat in the infobox while a party with more seats isn't there. Please fix this. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:05, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@MPGuy2824: Ji, Also pay attention to the local elections of Rajasthan. -- Karsan Chanda (talk) 03:10, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, beyond my interest. If you are able to find good sources for them, then you can create the articles yourself. If you start a

draft article and ping me, i might be able to help you get it ready for article space. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:14, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

@MPGuy2824: Ji, Thanks. -- Karsan Chanda (talk) 03:17, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@MPGuy2824: Can you change my page Chanda dynast to Chanda. -- Karsan Chanda (talk) 07:40, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Chanda already exists (as a redirect). At best the name can be "Chanda (dynasty)", but i'd suggest that you leave it as it is now. Also, you can move (i.e. rename) pages yourself. See Wikipedia:Moving a page#How to move a page. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:47, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@MPGuy2824: Please verify the sources given by me in this article. -- Karsan Chanda (talk) 06:21, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:

No changes since previous decline, except for the addition of a source that only mentions Alan Singh in passing. The draft has to be rewritten: the topic is Alan Singh, but the draft focuses entirely on Amber Fort, on a book by James Tod, and on an attack. Again, please take a look at Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Biography to get an idea of how to structure a biography.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alan Singh and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Alan Singh, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 20:36, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Map ke bare mein kya aap samje hay? Itcouldbepossible^Talk 07:45, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

@Kavyansh.Singh: This article of Draft:Amagarh Fort is completely ready. -- Karsan Chanda (talk) 09:19, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It is still just a single sentence long. I feel there should be more that just mentioning where it is located. And you may submit the draft for review by clicking the blue box saying: "Submit the draft for review!". – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 09:30, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:

There is a combination of

WP:CITEKILL

– having nine sources for the single fact that the fort exists and is located in Jaipur district is very much over the top – and an almost complete lack of content in the draft. In addition to the citekill, several of the sources are not primarily about the fort. The references also lack some of the minimum information that's necessary for a proper citation; there is no info about publication dates, publishers, or authors.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Amagarh Fort and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Amagarh Fort, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 10:25, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Karsan Chanda! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Amagarh Fort, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread. See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both talk) 19:02, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply ]

@Muninnbot: Ji, See this page and tell if all its sources are correct? -- Karsan Chanda (talk) 09:41, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Karsan Chanda! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Khogong, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread. See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both talk) 19:02, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply ]

"On the day of Deepawali, the Kachhwaha dynasty Dulharay attacked all the Chanda dynasty and killed them while worshiping unarmed through deceit. Even today, Chanda Rajvanshi remember their ancestors on the Martyr Day of Deepawali.[9][10][11][12]" has nothing to do with Alan Singh and should therefore be removed from the draft. David notMD (talk) 11:50, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Alan Singh -- Karsan Chanda (talk) 11:59, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@David notMD: Ji, [9] आलन सिंह, [10] Ratan Singh or Alan Singh Chanda, [11] आलन सिंह, [12] Aalan Singh. -- Karsan Chanda (talk) 12:04, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@David notMD: Ji, The sentence is not correct, or the source is not correct. do let me know. -- Karsan Chanda (talk) 12:08, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I do not know about the history. Did the massacre occur while Singh was alive? If not, the content and references for the massacre have no connection to him. David notMD (talk) 13:39, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@David notMD: Ji, Singh was killed in this massacre. -- Karsan Chanda (talk) 13:44, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@David notMD: Ji, Now tell me whether these sources are habitable or not. -- Karsan Chanda (talk) 13:47, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not my area of knowledge. David notMD (talk) 14:26, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by RPSkokie were:

This submission appears to

independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid

when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hansraj Meena and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Hansraj Meena, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

RPSkokie (talk) 03:57, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

An article you recently created,

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject

independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid

when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

None of the sources is useful.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alan Singh and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 09:16, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This article needs to be longer than a six word sentence. Please expand it prior to resubmitting for namespace.

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:

This submission is not adequately supported by

Referencing for beginners and Citing sources

.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Please make sure that the references actually verify the information where they are placed, and please include at least a minimum of bibliographical info. Don't link to search strings in books, but always provide a page number (much more important than a Google Books link, which is optional) Raj era sources are not used in articles about ethnic or social groups.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mhair and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 16:19, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by NeverTry4Me was:

This submission provides insufficient

guide to writing better articles

for information on how to better format your submission.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

The content is too short for such an article. Further, infobox conflicts with context, and the sources section is not enclyopedic. Read

WP:REFB

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mhair and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

_{- Signed by} NeverTry4Me ^Talk 06:14, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject

independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid

when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mhair and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 07:52, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Greenman was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: User is wasting reviewer's time, making no attempt to address previous concerns.

Greenman (talk) 11:44, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Karsan Chanda. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 10:59, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Karsan Chanda. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:33, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:

This submission is not adequately supported by

Referencing for beginners and Citing sources

.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

The points made in the first decline notice have not been addressed. It is slightly absurd to make claims about current population or customs when the sources are 100-150 years old.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mhair and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 07:06, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Karsan Chanda. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:29, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

Hello, I'm Sumanuil. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to State Highway 122 (Rajasthan) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Sumanuil. 03:48, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

• Editing
• Referencing
• Images
• Tables
• Policies and guidelines
• Talk pages
• Navigating
• Manual of Style

---

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

---

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

• Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
• It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
• If an edit you make is reverted, you can
  discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus
  .
• When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
• If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
• Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Connecting

If you are interested, there is already a community of users who are

WP:USRD (United States)—and contribute. If your interest is in roads in the United States, there is an excellent new user's guide. There is a wealth of information and resources for creating a great article. If you have questions about any of these WikiProjects, you can ask on each project's talk page

, or you can ask me!

If you would like to chat with other editors, you can join the

Wikimedia Community Discord server

. Here, there are several editors who are willing to answer your questions.

Happy editing! Signed, Rschen7754 02:06, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Meena Empire has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unverifiable, there are no useful sources about a Meena Empire (the source given uses Mina, but doesn't call it an empire anyway)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

An article you recently created,

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pichemist was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth
  (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent
  of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chanda dynasty and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

_Signed, Pichemist ^{( Contribs | Talk )} 17:02, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Karsan Chanda. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:18, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Alan Singh. Thanks! bonadea contributions talk 18:34, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Wikieditor019 were:

This submission is not adequately supported by

guide to writing better articles

for information on how to better format your submission.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mhair and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Wikieditor019 (talk) 18:05, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Mhair. Thanks! Wikieditor019 (talk) 18:06, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, an article you recently created Public Works Department of Rajasthan, is not ready as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage with citations from

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

immediately remove pic in minas hindoo of low caste. Meena is. a tribe not a caste. kindly remove it immediately 2409:40D4:A:DD38:1C20:A8FF:FE21:5798 (talk) 12:28, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

don't reply — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2409:40D4:A:DD38:1C20:A8FF:FE21:5798 (talk) 12:29, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

immediately remove pic in minas hindoo of low caste. Meena is. a tribe not a caste. kindly remove it immediately — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2409:40D4:1006:43A:F0CB:A7FF:FEAC:F87C (talk) 03:27, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

Natwara, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 10:14, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Karsan Chanda. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by - 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 12:35, 26 March 2023 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Hello,

what are the major religious groups among the Bhil? Kind regards, Sarcelles (talk) 20:24, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Religion of The Bhils-a Sociological Analysis -- Karsan Chanda (talk) 01:41, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@

Sanskritization in each tribal communities. -- Karsan Chanda (talk) 04:30, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

The article Bhairavlal Kala Badal has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

NN person

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. UtherSRG (talk) 12:21, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth
  (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent
  of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Khogong and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 13:46, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Karsan Chanda. Thank you for your work on

in the infobox please merge consequtive terms if they were from the same constituency

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:35, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@MPGuy2824: Thanks for drawing attention but how it will happen please try to tell. -- Karsan Chanda (talk) 10:51, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've done this: [1]. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 11:00, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@MPGuy2824: Thanks. -- Karsan Chanda (talk) 12:11, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In the past 9 months, you've started a dozen new discussions at

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rawat Saraswat is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rawat Saraswat until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Paradoctor (talk) 12:37, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello - I notice you've placed an extended-protected edit request on this page, although your user page isn't protected. Is there something I might be able to help you with? Tollens (talk) 03:38, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Tollens: Persistent disruptive editing by anonymous IP. -- Karsan Chanda (talk) 03:44, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Where, specifically? On this page? Tollens (talk) 03:45, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Tollens: See -- Karsan Chanda (talk) 03:48, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I see. Yeah, semi-protection would appear to perhaps be appropriate here. I see you've put in a request for page protection of your userpage - this might not be what you're looking for as there doesn't appear to be any disruption there. Were you instead looking for this talk page protected? Tollens (talk) 03:54, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You can feel free to delete those comments if you'd like as they appear, by the way. I could remove the ones that are here now for you, if you'd like? Tollens (talk) 03:55, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The comments appear to be expressing concern with some image at Meena, however, but don't make it clear which here or at the article's talk page. Are you aware of the particular objection they're raising? Tollens (talk) 04:02, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Tollens: Yes, I know he is objecting to this photo. -- Karsan Chanda (talk) 04:27, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see an actual discussion anywhere - have you engaged with them on the topic of the image's inclusion at any point? Tollens (talk) 05:08, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Tollens: No. -- Karsan Chanda (talk) 05:12, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion would seem to me to be a logical first step, then. Tollens (talk) 05:38, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Tollens: He is not ready to discuss. -- Karsan Chanda (talk) 06:55, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Karsan Chanda. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:54, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alan Singh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alan Singh until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

NP83 (talk) 19:07, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your questions to me at RSN are unrelated to RSN. Please do not ping me with questions about issues at AFD. Your article will be deleted or not based on whether it is notable or not. I am not interested in weighing in on that question. Also, I have reminded you about the instructions at RSN, as have other editors. After 3 years of editing, over 1K edits and dozens of questions at RSN, you should not be posturing as a new, inexperienced editor. Review

At the Alan Singh AFD, you cited some sources and then later, when quotes were requested, said that you didn't have access to them. I also had found earlier that you had added claims to the Alan Singh article that were not supported by the sources you cited.

This is not ok! You should cite sources only if you they are

@Abecedare: There is nothing like that, I can see only a small part of it. I thought there is an expert on Wikipedia who can explain clearly by looking at it, that's why I said so, but you took it in the wrong sense. -- Karsan Chanda (talk) 23:15, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Karsan, in case you missed my question on the AFD, I'll re-post it here: can you tell me the page number where the quote you added to the Alan Singh article and the AFD appear in Kooiman's book? I ask because the quote raises several red-flags for me. Abecedare (talk) 00:20, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Karsan Chanda I'd also like to see it. Doug Weller talk 11:28, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, I have requested an admin to review your editing and source misrepresentation. If you wish, you can add your comment at Bishonen's talkpage. Abecedare (talk) 01:23, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently edited a page related to

contentious

. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the

Ctopics/aware

}} template.

Abecedare (talk) 16:05, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Abecedare: Which page are you talking about? -- Karsan Chanda (talk) 23:07, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Khoh, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

• Firstly, you seem to have jumped in the deep end of Wikipedia, by creating articles. The warnings on your page, and especially your very recent edit here (showing both that you don't understand the problem, and that you use a wrong edit summary of "fixed typo") demonstrate that you are still far from ready to do this. I strongly advise you to take smaller steps, and to learn Wikipedia's principles by improving existing articles. Your creation of Alan Sing, all the comments about your resubmission of it without improvements here, and your input in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alan Singh all show that you're not ready, and that many experienced users have spent time advising you, without much effect.

• Secondly, your use of sources is subpar. This recent warning from Abecedare and your responses to it are especially concerning.

You have replied to Abecedare on my own page that there is no need to worry about you, because when a new editor comes, he makes mistakes because he does not know the legal claims of Wikipedia, you have tried to see almost all my mistakes, thank you very much for that, but your opinion about me Is wrong because I try to correct back the mistakes made by me too so you don't have to worry you can trust me without worrying. I can't agree. My review shows in the first place that you are not that new; you have been here for 2 years 3 months and made 3,139 edits. As for correcting back your mistakes, unfortunately it looks like you don't always understand these mistakes even when they are pointed out and explained. Could this be a language issue? If Hindi is your native language, I urge you to contribute to the Hindi Wikipedia. Meanwhile, I'm afraid I have felt obliged to topic ban you from the topics of India, Pakistan and Afghanistan. See below. If you still wish to contribute to the English Wikipedia, you can practice your editing skills in other areas before returning to the very sensitive India-Pakistan-Afghanistan topics. Also, you are free to edit the other English

The following

topic ban

now applies to you:

You have been indefinitely topic banned from all pages and discussions related to either India, Pakistan or Afghanistan

You have been sanctioned for persistent difficulties in creating articles and in using sources, despite advice from many experienced users.

This topic ban is imposed in my capacity as an

WP:TBAN to understand what a topic ban is. If you do not comply with the topic ban, you may be blocked

for an extended period to enforce the ban.

If you wish to appeal the ban, please read the appeals process. You are free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. Bishonen | tålk 09:29, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Bishonen: Would you mind telling me which is the page for which my account is blocked. -- Karsan Chanda (talk) 09:38, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are not blocked at all, Karsan Chanda. There is an important difference between blocks and bans: blocks prevent you, in a technical way, from editing a particular page or all pages, or whatever you have been blocked from. Bans don't prevent anything, they merely forbid you from certain actions, and it's then your own responsibility to not do the forbidden actions. Your ban states that you are not allowed to make any edits to any pages related to either India, Pakistan, or Afghanistan. If you make such edits anyway, you may be blocked, as a sanction for violating the ban. All right? Looking at your recent edits for examples, you are from now on not allowed to edit Khoh, Alan Singh, Draft:Chanda dynasty and so on. These are just a few examples. You're not allowed to edit their talkpages either, or to engage in any discussions related to India, Pakistan, or Afghanistan, for instance on user talkpages. If you want to make an edit but you're uncertain if it's allowed, please ask first. You can ask me or another admin. I hope this is clear. Please ask again if you still don't understand. Bishonen | tålk 14:40, 25 April 2023 (UTC).[reply]

Hi, Karsan Chanda. You may appeal your ban, or ask me for clarification of your ban, but you may not otherwise post anything connected with India, which you have been topic banned from. What you posted here is nothing to do with appealing or asking about your ban; it's just something about India, and about sources. (I don't understand why you call it a "reply" either; it doesn't seem to reply to anything anybody has said above,) Doing it on my page doesn't help; you don't get to do it anywhere on Wikipedia. Please don't do it again, or you will be blocked. Bishonen | tålk 16:00, 28 April 2023 (UTC).[reply]

Hi, Bishonen. I have learned English so will you help me? -- Karsan Chanda (talk) 07:11, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, no. You are now indefinitely blocked for

sockpuppetry. See your userpage. Bishonen | tålk 09:58, 21 January 2024 (UTC).[reply

]

Hello, Karsan Chanda. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:01, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Buddy can you provide your Email ID, so we can connect. I want to have a discussion with you. TheRealAnalysis (talk) 05:56, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Toddst1 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chanda dynasty and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Toddst1 (talk) 22:03, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

Hi, Doug Weller. Can you help me? -- Karsan Chanda (talk) 08:01, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How? Doug Weller talk 08:08, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Doug Weller. I was banned because I don't know English but now I have learned English. Therefore, I would like your help in removing the block and ban of my account. -- Karsan Chanda (talk) 08:20, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have two problems. One I failed to notify you about for which I apologise but if you look at your user page I noted it there. Also see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Karsan Chanda/Archive. The notice I've added below tells you how to appeal. Unless you are successful there's now way of appealing your topic ban by User:Bishonen/ Doug Weller talk 09:13, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

REMOVE BLOCK 2409:40D4:1006:6FA9:74AD:A3FF:FEA9:41F5 (talk) 17:04, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators:

IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Doug Weller talk 09:09, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

Category:Meena clans has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 04:38, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Meena people has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 21:34, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.  Doug Weller talk 17:39, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]