User talk:Klortho

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

ANI case

Information icon There is currently a discussion at

talk) 04:21, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

User talk pages

Users are welcome to change their use talk pages as they like. When removing things that aren't insulting or anything, that is an indication of bad faith, but that's their problem. Refusing to use a users username, no matter how self-aggrandizing, is rude. You should stop that. --OpenFuture (talk) 12:56, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the feedback. I disagree with you about refusing to use his username. I was surprised to learn that it's not against the rules to delete another's comments on user talk pages. But I think FxC has a nasty habit of using his mastery of WP policies to dominate discussions and bludgeon his opponents, as opposed to having a civil discussion based on common sense and sound reasoning. Klortho (talk) 14:58, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
You are both
WP:BATTLE-prone, and I fall into that as well sometimes. That's bad. If you are unable to even type out his name, you should probably not interact with him at all. Just don't respond. Mastery of policy can indeed be used to disrupt, the only way to fix that is to read up on those processes as they happen. It's a lot of work, but worth it. --OpenFuture (talk) 18:17, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply
]
Thanks again. It's good advice. Klortho (talk) 23:26, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March events and meetups in DC

Greetings from Wikimedia DC!

Looking for something to do in DC in March? We have a series of great events planned for the month:

Can't make it to an event? Most of our edit-a-thons allow virtual participation; see the guide for more details.

Do you have an idea for a future event? Please write to us at [email protected]!

Kirill Lokshin (talk) 16:29, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You're receiving this message because you signed up for updates about DC meetups. To unsubscribe, please remove your name from the list.

The Signpost: 02 March 2016

The Signpost: 09 March 2016

The Signpost: 16 March 2016

The Signpost: 23 March 2016

The Signpost: 1 April 2016

The Signpost: 14 April 2016

The Signpost: 24 April 2016

The Signpost: 2 May 2016

The Signpost: 17 May 2016

The Signpost: 28 May 2016

The Signpost: 05 June 2016

The Signpost: 15 June 2016

BAMN

Hi, I would appreciate it if you could add your input on this issue: Talk:2016_Sacramento_riot#BAMN_on_FBI_terror_list. Thanks! --Eightofnine (talk) 23:18, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for adding your input. I appreciate it. --Eightofnine (talk) 00:58, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 04 July 2016

Question on BLM talk page

Klortho, I am still somewhat unclear on what, precisely, you're arguing here. I know you have said that there is a double standard, but I'm not clear on whether you're pointing to those because you think they should be removed, or simply to make a point about "double standards". Which of these are you arguing?

  1. You don't actually think there are any problems with those items, but you think editors are biased because those are not any less verifiable than the claims about the DePaul protests.
  2. You do think there are problem with those items AND with the DePaul protests.
  3. You think there is a problem with those other cases, but you think the coverage of the DePaul protest is fine.

Please clarify. Nblund (talk) 16:27, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'll respond on the talk page. Klortho (talk) 01:56, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

POV Tag

Okay, since you haven't responded, I addressed the specific issues you mentioned in talk with re-wording and additional sources, and removed the POV tag again. If you want to replace it, you need to point to some aspect of the article content that is actually biased. Cleanup tags are meant to signify an issue that can be addressed with article content, not your beliefs about other editors. NPOV does not apply to talk page proposals, and there is no such thing as "prima facie" evidence of bias. If you are actually fine with the article in its current state, then you absolutely shouldn't be adding cleanup templates to it.

I want to improve the article, I didn't find (and still haven't found) verification for the claim related to DePaul. Several other editors also recognized the exact same issue I did. It's counterproductive and, frankly, just obnoxious, to make accusations of editorial bias simply because you disagree with someone about content. Going forward: just stick to discussing article content and keep your views about other editors to yourself unless you have some kind of meaningful evidence of impropriety. I think several of your comments have already been

WP:UNCIVIL, but I am still willing to work with you if you show a little more tact. Nblund (talk) 00:17, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

"there is no such thing as "prima facie" evidence of bias" -- citation needed. I take issue with every point you raised above, especially with regards to my being uncivil. From what I've seen, you've steamrolled every discussion that you've been involved in, repeating the same assertions over and over, wearing everyone else down through attrition, and utterly deaf to valid points that counter your arguments. Klortho (talk) 01:33, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 21 July 2016

NPOV

We the editors will make changes to pages. You are welcome to help move the discussion but endless threats and circular "discussions" are unhelpful. You seem to have a narrow view but I will try to work with your ideas. It's not personal and therefore I expect the same from you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Landerman56 (talkcontribs) 21:03, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, okay, I will try to be as responsive as I can. I have always said that I think the page could use improvements. And, yes, I know that my viewpoint is a minority one among the editors who have poked their heads up so far. And I'm, of course, familiar with "verifiability, not truth", but nevertheless, I would repeat the same question I asked you before, just on a personal level: Why is it so important to you to besmirch this Nobel Prize winner's reputation? Regardless of what you consider his "thought-crime", he made fantastic contributions to science. And, I think he's 89 years old now, and has paid a great price already. Frankly, even if I agreed with you on the adjective, I can't even see that insisting on adding it makes this a better encyclopedia. Klortho (talk) 22:44, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 04 August 2016

Wikiversity Journal of Medicine, an open access peer reviewed journal with no charges, invites you to participate

Hi

Did you know about Wikiversity Journal of Medicine? It is an open access, peer reviewed medical journal, with no publication charges. We welcome you to have a look. Feel free to participate.

You can participate in any one or more of the following ways:

The future of this journal as a separate Wikimedia project is under discussion and the name can be changed suitably. Currently a voting for the same is underway. Please cast your vote in the name you find most suitable. We would be glad to receive further suggestions from you. It is also acceptable to mention your votes in the wide-reach@wikiversityjournal.org email list. Please note that the voting closes on 16th August, 2016, unless protracted by consensus, due to any reason.

-from

talk · contribs · count
) and others of the Editorial Board, Wikiversity Journal of Medicine.

Talk 10:10, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

The Signpost: 18 August 2016

The Signpost: 06 September 2016

The Signpost: 29 September 2016

The Signpost: 14 October 2016

The Signpost: 4 November 2016

ArbCom Elections 2016
: Voting now open!

Hello, Klortho. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections
is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 4 November 2016

The Signpost: 22 December 2016

The Signpost: 17 January 2017

The Signpost: 6 February 2017

The Signpost: 27 February 2017

The Signpost: 9 June 2017

The Signpost: 23 June 2017

Invitation to editathon at ISMB/ECCB 2017

The Signpost: 15 July 2017

The Signpost: 5 August 2017

The Signpost: 6 September 2017

The Signpost: 25 September 2017

ISCB Wikipedia Competition: call for participation

The Signpost: 23 October 2017


Please unblock VPN IP address for logged-in users

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Klortho (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Using Private Internet Access VPN while logged in. IP address == 173.239.192.0/18

Decline reason:

There's no right to edit through a VPN, and given the edits from that IP range preceding the block, I think it's better if it remains inaccessible. Huon (talk) 00:08, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Klortho (talk) 23:47, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If unblocking is not an option, could someone please point me to the WP policy on editing from VPNs? Thanks! Klortho (talk) 23:58, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
VPNs are considered a form of anonymising proxy and treated according to
WP:OPENPROXY. Huon (talk) 01:17, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply
]
Thanks for the link! Klortho (talk) 03:19, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

IP block exempt

I have granted your account an

full blocks affecting your IP address
when you are logged in.

Please read the page

IP block exemption conditions
.

Note in particular that you are not permitted to use this userright to edit Wikipedia via anonymous proxies, or disruptively. If you do, or there is a concern of abuse, then the right may be removed by any administrator.

Appropriate usage and compliance with the policy may be checked (through the use of CheckUser) periodically, due to the nature of block exemption, and block exemption will be removed when no longer needed (for example, when the block it is related to expires).

I hope this will enhance your editing, and allow you to edit successfully and without disruption. Swarm 00:23, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hi Klortho. I've granted you this IPBE permission for the duration of one year. Should you need it renewed after this point, please make a request at
    WP:PERM, or via Template:Admin help. Welcome back, and best regards! Swarm 00:28, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply
    ]
Thanks! Klortho (talk) 00:43, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 24 November 2017

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Klortho. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 18 December 2017

The Signpost: 16 January 2018

ISCB Wikipedia Competition 2018: entries open!

The Signpost: 5 February 2018

The Signpost: 20 February 2018

Courses Modules are being deprecated

Hello,

Your account is currently configured with an education program flag. This system (the Courses system) is being deprecated. As such, your account will soon be updated to remove these no longer supported flags. For details on the changes, and how to migrate to using the replacement system (the Programs and Events Dashboard) please see Wikipedia:Education noticeboard/Archive 18#NOTICE: EducationProgram extension is being deprecated.

Thank you! Sent by: xaosflux 20:28, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost issue 4 – 29 March 2018

The Signpost: 26 April 2018

The Signpost: 24 May 2018

The Signpost: 29 June 2018

The Signpost: 31 July 2018

8th ISCB Wikipedia Competition: entries open!

The Signpost: 30 August 2018

The Signpost: 1 October 2018

The Signpost: 28 October 2018

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Klortho. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 1 December 2018

The Signpost: 24 December 2018

The Signpost: 31 January 2019

8th ISCB Wikipedia Competition: a reminder

The Signpost: 28 February 2019

The Signpost: 31 March 2019

8th ISCB Wikipedia Competition: entries closing soon!

The Signpost: 30 April 2019

8th ISCB Wikipedia competition: deadline extended!

The Signpost: 31 May 2019

Membership renewal

You have been a member of

Wiki Project Med Foundation
(WPMEDF) in the past. Your membership, however, appears to have expired. As such this is a friendly reminder encouraging you to officially rejoin WPMEDF. There are no associated costs. Membership gives you the right to vote in elections for the board. The current membership round ends in 2020.


Thanks again :-) The team at Wiki Project Med Foundation---Avicenno (talk) 05:34, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The June 2019 Signpost is out!

The Signpost: 31 July 2019

The Signpost: 30 August 2019

The Signpost: 30 September 2019

The Signpost: 31 October 2019

The Signpost: 29 November 2019

The Signpost: 27 December 2019

The Signpost: 27 January 2020

The Signpost: 1 March 2020

The Signpost: 29 March 2020

The Signpost: 26 April 2020

Membership renewal of Wiki Project Med Foundation

Membership renewal

You have been a member of

Wiki Project Med Foundation
(WPMEDF) in the past. Your membership, however, appears to have expired. As such this is a friendly reminder encouraging you to officially rejoin WPMEDF. There are no associated costs. Membership gives you the right to vote in elections for the board. The current membership round ends in 2022.


Thanks again :-) The team at Wiki Project Med Foundation---Avicenno (talk), 2021.01