User talk:Leecullen14

Hi Leecullen14! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Fragrant Peony (talk) 09:56, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much!@Fragrant Peony! Leecullen14 (talk) 08:32, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at

Draft:Perivoli Schools Trust. Thanks! Greenman (talk) 00:02, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Thanks so much for the feedback! Leecullen14 (talk) 05:38, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Perivoli Schools Trust, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— The Most Comfortable Chair 18:42, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamiebuba was:

This submission appears to

independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability

of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Perivoli Foundation and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jamiebuba (talk) 15:38, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Leecullen14! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jamiebuba (talk) 15:38, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Jamiebuba (talk) 15:39, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Leecullen14, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Best practices for editors with close associations
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Jimfbleak - talk to me? 15:48, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Leecullen14. You used the {{Help me}} template, but you wanted an answer from a specific editor. If you still need help, please add your question to that editor's talk page instead. Alternatively, you can ask your question at the Teahouse, the help desk, or join Wikipedia's Live Help IRC channel to get real-time assistance.

Hi Jimfbleak and thank you for your feedback. I did submit this article for review rather than straight to publish to make sure I followed the guidelines correctly, so I really appreciate you coming back to me so quickly. Also apologies for anything that was incorrect, it was not my intention to do anything wrong. I think by removing two of the paragraphs in then original copy, this article should then meet the encyclopaedic style of Wikipedia. I think the userspace draft as you suggest would be the best next step, but I just wanted to check if you agree? Thank you.

~~~~ Leecullen14 (talk) 19:52, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Closing helpme, pinging Jimfbleak. Primefac (talk) 20:03, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Leecullen14, I won't see messages here unless you link to my user name and sign in the same edit, as Primefac has done for you. One important point is that you have not responded to my COI query above. You must do so if you don't want to risk being blocked as an undeclared paid editor Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:53, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jimfbleak thank you - first time using the chat facility! On the COI point I am working with the Foundation, so am creating this page on their behalf. This is why I wanted to submit the article for review and feedback. It is a charitable foundation and I did believe the article to be neutral in tone and information, so I believed I was following the guidelines. Please let me know if there is something more I need to do on that though?

~~~~ Leecullen14 (talk) 12:12, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Since you are working for the foundation, it is mandatory that you copy the following as you see it on to your user page at User:Leecullen14 and save it {{paid|user=Leecullen14|employer=Perivoli Foundation|client=}} Jimfbleak - talk to me? 14:05, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jimfbleak okay thanks for sharing that, I have now updated it so please let me know if that's okay. Is there anything else I should do before progressing to the revised draft? Leecullen14 (talk) 19:27, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You could give some info on the organisation itself. Where is it based? How many employees? What is its income, and how much does it spend. You might consider an infobox; see for example Oxfam Jimfbleak - talk to me? 08:39, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jimfbleak thank you that sounds like a great idea. Should I look to do that in a new userspace draft and re-submit for feedback? Really appreciate all of your guidance with this. 2A02:C7C:2E2D:5600:94C4:87E6:9454:224 (talk) 08:09, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I think that's the way to go Jimfbleak - talk to me? 10:00, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jimfbleak I hope you are well. I have followed your advice and created a new draft with an infobox in the userspace draft so I hope that has gone into the review process. The link is Leecullen14/sandbox/Perivoli Foundation - if you had a moment to share any feedback that would be very helpful. If not I'm happy to wait for another editor to review, but hopefully this all looks okay! Thank you in advance. Leecullen14 (talk) 12:24, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've cleaned up what you have put, but the organisation appears to have no headquarters, staff, income or expenditure, so you haven't given any indication of notability. Also, your refs are affiliated with the foundation or quoting/interviewing it. We need independent third-party sources, not the organisation telling us about itself. Minor points; two of the refs just give a title, but not the source, and the logo should be in the infobox, using

| logo =

| logo_size =

| logo_caption =

Jimfbleak - talk to me? 15:13, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Perivoli Foundation. Thanks! UtherSRG (talk) 13:26, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth
  (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent
  of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

We need to see significant coverage in multiple independent and reliable secondary sources. This excludes coverage of indirectly related matters, as well as anyone associated with the organisation telling us about it.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Perivoli Foundation and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:15, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An IP user (possible you, but not logged in?) submitted this for review again. I figured to post this here so you knew:

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by UtherSRG was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

The coverage is primarily about the Perivoli Schools Trust, which we already have an article about. I suggest merging info from this draft into that article, as I don't think there will ever be enough coverage of the Foundation to support an article. -

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Perivoli Foundation and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

UtherSRG (talk) 12:19, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the feedback on this. I do have some other independent references so will have another look at restructuring the submission, so the focus in more on the Foundation. Hopefully I can make it work as the Perivoli Foundation is doing some amazing things and I do genuinely think (having read the Wiki criteria carefully!) that it is deserving of one. If there is anything else you would suggest doing please let me know as I really appreciate the feedback. Leecullen14 (talk) 10:13, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]