User talk:Malayala Sahityam

Hi, I'm Ironholds. Malayala Sahityam, thanks for creating Ulsaha Committee!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Thanks for writing this article! Please do address the tags on it. Let me know if you need any help doing so :)

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on

A tag has been placed on Jenuse Mohamed, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. (See
  section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify
  their content.
• It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See
  section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable
  .

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Uthara Unnikrishnan for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Karlhard (talk) 20:20, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

IBTimes is a reliable source, but reliability depends on the facts. There is no review of the author there, opinion is entirely based on the three local site reviews. Read it once more and understand. You can be a fan but don't consider wikipedia for promotion. VagaboundWind (talk) 13:44, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On 23 April 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Uthara Unnikrishnan, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that 10-year-old Uthara Unnikrishnan is the youngest-ever recipient of the Indian National Film Award for Best Female Playback Singer? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Uthara Unnikrishnan. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 22:46, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

From the source of IBTimes, their verdict was based on 3 reviews & 2 of them are unprofessional sites onlookersmedia and lensmen.com. So it cannot be used as an overall verdict of the film as "below average". Even the heading of the article is "'Lailaa O Lailaa' Movie Review Round-Up: Critics Rate Mohanlal–Amala Paul Starrer as "Average" It questions articles credibility. And IBTimes is not a review aggregator. "The sources must be based on facts". And i had added another source click here from IBTimes itself saying "the film has opened to average reviews". it's contradicting. And more over an additional source, which is much important for Wikipedia. VagaboundWind (talk) 07:54, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the notification at

Apart from the above, let me use this opportunity to bring into your notice about the translations of Indulekha (novel) on the respective page. As per your edit on 05:05, 29 May 2014, The novel has been translated into many languages. Kindly do the quantification of the many and clarification of languages, both are tagged as per the requirements as on 16 February 2015‎, your edit is only about English translations. Information given might be in accordance with the cited article from the Mathrubhumi Illustrated Weekily, but its better to rewrite with additional references or as a quotation (please use the quote parameter in the citation template, while doing so) by the respective authors, if you are not sure about the details.
Happy Editing
(harith (talk) 04:12, 23 May 2015 (UTC))[reply]

If you want to source objective box office numbers, fine. But

@

List of box office bombs. I will try to reword what I had written and attribute it to the source which reported that. Let the readers decide whether to buy it or not. Malayala Sahityam (talk) 20:05, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

You do not have consensus to add it. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 20:12, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Mundur Krishnankutty

added a link pointing to Mundur

Priya A. S.

added a link pointing to Maharajas College

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the List of Malayalam literary awards page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited V. M. Devadas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vadakkancheri. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Sufi Paranja Katha (film), and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.in.com/tv/movies/surya-tv-136/sufi-paranja-katha-42542.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Valliettan page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

The content clearly hasn't been there since March 2010 because the page was only created in August 2015 and hadn't existed before. Did you copy the text from another article? If so you need to follow the procedure in

@Hut 8.5: Thanks for the information. I didn't know that copying within wikipedia requires proper attribution. The parent article was created in 2010 and the plot summary was added by User:Sreejithk2000. I will now attribute the content to the original author in the edit summary. Malayala Sahityam (talk) 06:37, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine, thanks. (You don't necessarily have to do it in the edit where you attribute the content, you can just make any old edit to the page and include something like that in the edit summary.) Hut 8.5 17:54, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

why to deny access the padmarajan movies in youtube?--Dvellakat (talk) 11:55, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@

copyright violation, such as a film or music video. Sorry for not notifying you the proper reason for the revert. - Malayala Sahityam (talk) 13:11, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

@

you tube is not violating copyright. and so it is safe to publish. then Malayalam Wikipedia also linking many from you tube videos Dvellakat (talk) 16:34, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

@Dvellakat: Many YouTube videos are illegally uploaded and are copyright violation. We normally include video links only if the film is in public domain. I am not sure about Malayalam Wikipedia entries but if such links are used, then they should definitely be removed. Malayala Sahityam (talk) 17:38, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Arundhati Roy may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "[]"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• In November 2011, she was awarded the [[Norman Mailer Prize]] for Distinguished Writing.<ref>[http://hamishhamilton.co.uk/news/from-norman-mailer-to-arundhati-roy "From Norman Mailer to
• roy "From Norman Mailer to Arundhati Roy". [[Hamish Hamilton]]. Retrieved December 13, 2015).</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow

Thanks for uploading File:Vallathol Narayana Menon.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014 Kerala Sahitya Akademi Awards, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chokher Bali. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:21, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Malayala Sahityam. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Malayala Sahityam. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating K. M. George, Malayala Sahityam!

Wikipedia editor Animalparty just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Note that per

MOS:DAB

, entries should have only a single link per line.

To reply, leave a comment on Animalparty's talk page.

Learn more about

--Animalparty! (talk) 22:56, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jenuse Mohamed is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jenuse Mohamed until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --Let There Be Sunshine 16:49, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Malayala Sahityam. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on 2017 Kerala Sahitya Akademi Awards requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

moved page due to wrong year. unable to create proper page now.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

An article you recently created,

]

Blocked

illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 21:51, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply ]

Invitation to WikiProject Socialism

Thank you for your recent contributions to one of Wikipedia's socialism articles. Did you know there's a WikiProject for editors interested in writing about socialism? If you would like to join, simply click the Join WikiProject button on the WikiProject Socialism page. If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask at the WikiProject Socialism talk page. We look forward to working with you in the future! MarioGom (talk) 22:39, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply ]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Sudhakar Mangalodayam, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at

Thank you for your attention.

Hello, Malayala Sahityam. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 00:09, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've seen you're continuously making the change to MT's date of birth. Please check the talk page before making such solo decisions. --Joseph 💬 12:18, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You're leaving messages for people and reverting edits while logged out. Although editing while logged out is not against the rules, it is disruptive to edit while logged out to

On 13 December 2020, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article U. A. Khader, which you nominated and updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 02:08, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work! – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 02:08, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On 27 December 2020, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Sugathakumari, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 10:33, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Indulekha (1967 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film, nothing found in a

WP:NFILM

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 16:42, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Indulekha (1967 film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indulekha (1967 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Donaldd23 (talk) 14:38, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:58, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. defcon5 (talk) 05:10, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks for making Wikipedia more useful Padavalam🌂  ►  15:28, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cynic (film critic) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created,

general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:16, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Proposed deletion of T. M. P. Nedungadi

The article T. M. P. Nedungadi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not enough in-depth coverage to show they pass

WP:GNG

.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:06, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

T. M. P. Nedungadi moved to draftspace

An article you recently created,

general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 21:43, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Nomination of Pramod Raman for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pramod Raman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pramod Raman until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Iamfarzan (talk) 13:24, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Cynic (film critic)

article space

.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under

userfication

of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occurred, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available

here

.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

talk) 14:01, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Concern regarding Draft:T. M. P. Nedungadi

request

that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

talk) 22:02, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply ]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:09, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Malayala Sahityam. Thank you for your work on

page curation process

, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:23, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of C. S. Gopala Panicker

The article C. S. Gopala Panicker has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

As per my research this is not notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the

talk) 10:00, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Kerala Film Critics Association Awards 2011

moved to draftspace

Thanks for creating

Kerala Film Critics Association Awards 2011

. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Reading Beans (talk) 07:16, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I Have Become the Tide

Hello, Malayala Sahityam, I have restored the category you have twice removed because it is supported by the content and reference in the article, and because categories help readers find relevant content. We can continue to discuss this on the article talk page, or find another

dispute resolution option. Thank you, Beccaynr (talk) 16:32, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

And thank you for your patience with my misunderstanding and your kind explanations. Cheers, Beccaynr (talk) 00:06, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

O. V. Vijayan Literary Award

Hi friend, The literary award in the name of O. V. Vijayan that Mathews and V. M. Devadas received recently is different from the award mentioned in the article by name, O. V. Vijayan Literary Award. The one in the article is given by Naveena Samskaarika Kala Kendram, Hyderabad (https://www.dcbooks.com/o-v-vijayan-literary-award-for-karunakaran.html) while the award which was announced recently is sponsored by O. V. Vijayan Smaraka Samithi in Tasrak, in Palakkad, Kerala. As such, I have reverted your good faith edit on the award page.--jojo@nthony (talk) 18:48, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tachs. Sorry, I did not bother to read the entire article before putting that up in Wikipedia. Thank you for your revert and for notifying it here. Malayala Sahityam (talk) 09:49, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I knew it was just an oversight. Happy editing! jojo@nthony (talk) 10:04, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Writer's Barnstar
	I wanted to appreciate you for giving your time and effort to write history and literature related articles. You are a a great contributor to this encyclopedia! Thilsebatti (talk) 05:03, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Fellows of the Kerala Sangeetha Nataka Akademi

A tag has been placed on

section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion

.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:24, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Help to better Iratta

I have seen your edits for Christy. if you could provide Reception info and other such details in clarity. They page can be put for review. As this page has been previously deleted. Aadirulez8 (talk) 06:48, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I am actually on a short wiki break but will try to improve the article if time permits.Malayala Sahityam (talk) 13:08, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate Aadirulez8 (talk) 19:59, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Vellapokkathil is a very good page. Well done. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 02:39, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thayat Sankaran

moved to draftspace

An article you recently created,

general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:33, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

After adding additional citations to meet our notability guidelines I moved it back to mainspace. Thilsebatti (talk) 00:58, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for working on the article and moving it back to mainspace. I was planning to work on it in the coming days but was just demotivated as I always feel when articles get draftified in the first place. Malayala Sahityam (talk) 01:53, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Both of us are from Kerala so we know Thayat Sankaran is notable. But this kind of problem can happen anytime. Do you know any websites like internet archive from where we could collect information from old Malayalam newspapers? This could be really helpful. Thilsebatti (talk) 09:23, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I do not think there are any. However, Internet Archive does have some old magazines like Malayalanadu, Kalakaumudi, and Malayalam Vaarika archived. Although these collections are not complete, they still have a good number of issues available. Also, the Indian Express Madras edition is available on Google Newspapers and has a good coverage of Kerala topics. You may already be aware of this, but otherwise, it is a very useful resource. Malayala Sahityam (talk) 19:26, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.

Tusk001 (talk) 13:18, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Author not found in the list

Hi. I created Ambadi Ikkavamma by translating from the Malayalam wikipedia. As per ml wiki and a source from Mathrubhumi, she is the winner of 1978 Kerala Sahitya Akademi Award. But I was not able to find her name on the list of any of the 12 categories. Any idea what went wrong? Thilsebatti (talk) 06:49, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi User:Thilsebatti. Apologies for the delayed response. I have checked the official website for the award recipients across all the categories for 1978 and other years and I could not find her name listed. Additionally, I also checked the recipients of the endowment awards (some of which were active in 1978), but her name did not appear there either. It seems that the Mathrubhumi source is incorrect. IMO, it would be advisable to remove the claim of her receiving the award. Malayala Sahityam (talk) 11:38, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Let me correct it. Thilsebatti (talk) 01:09, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kerala Film Critics Association Awards 2011 has been accepted

Kerala Film Critics Association Awards 2011, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~Kvng (talk) 20:15, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 29 March 2024

• Technology report: Millions of readers still seeing broken pages as "temporary" disabling of graph extension nears its second year

• Interview: Interview on Wikimedia Foundation fundraising and finance strategy

• Special report: 19-page PDF accuses Wikipedia of bias against Israel, suggests editors be forced to reveal their real names, and demands a new feature allowing people to view the history of Wikipedia articles

• Op-Ed: Wikipedia in the age of personality-driven knowledge

• Recent research: "Newcomer Homepage" feature mostly fails to boost new editors

• News and notes: Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee Charter ratified

• In the media: "For me it’s the autism": AARoad editors on the fork more traveled

• Traffic report: He rules over everything, on the land called planet Dune

• Humour: Letters from the editors

• Comix: Layout issue

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:40, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]