User talk:Mathieulalie

This user is a student editor in University_of_Washington/Cultures_of_Franco-America_(Fall) .

Welcome!

Hello, Mathieulalie, and

welcome to Wikipedia

! My name is Ian and I work with Wiki Education; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

Handouts
Editing Wikipedia, a guide for student editors Choosing an article to edit Add images to articles Citing sources on Wikipedia
Additional Resources
You can find answers to many student questions in our FAQ.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 16:13, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at
Megan Cornish
(June 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gusfriend was:

This submission is not adequately supported by

Referencing for beginners and Citing sources

.

The comment the reviewer left was:

YouTube is generally not a

WP:RS

.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to

Draft:Megan Cornish

and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.

If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to
Draft:Megan Cornish, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7
}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.

If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gusfriend (talk) 11:02, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mathieulalie! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Gusfriend (talk) 11:02, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Megan Cornish
has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at

Draft:Megan Cornish. Thanks! asilvering (talk) 17:53, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

@Mathieulalie, please resubmit this. No changes are needed; the previous reviewer is correct to note that YT is not normally a reliable source, but this is clearly one of the exceptions to "not normally". You may want to add more details to the citations to make this clear. I've altered one of them so you can see what I mean. -- asilvering (talk) 17:57, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Megan Cornish
has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at

Draft:Megan Cornish. Thanks! Gusfriend (talk) 10:49, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Links to draft articles

Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 15:31, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

I apologize, I did not know that is a rule and I will not do it again. Thank you for letting me know! Mathieulalie (talk) 03:26, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Megan Cornish has been accepted

Megan Cornish, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Doric Loon (talk) 12:10, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Mathieulalie! Your additions to

suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism

issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 02:42, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at
Harold Pritchett
(August 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bearcat was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This is depending far too heavily on

WP:GNG

-worthy coverage about him.
A person does not get over our notability criteria by virtue of having his own personal papers archived, or by virtue of having given interviews in which he was speaking about his own work in the first person -- a person gets over our notability criteria by being the subject of third-party coverage in newspapers and magazines and books that independently analyze his significance.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
Draft:Harold Pritchett
and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bearcat (talk) 19:46, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please declare your paid status on talk pages of Drafts and articles

The following will serve you well:

{{Connected contributor (paid) |User1=Mathieulalie |U1-employer=University of Washington Libraries |U1-client=University of Washington Libraries |U1-EH=yes |U1-otherlinks=Declared correctly at the editor's user page}}

It is really up to you as part of your specialities as a paid editor to do this. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 19:37, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Garry Owens has been accepted

Garry Owens, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 04:48, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Harold Pritchett has been accepted

Harold Pritchett, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Deb (talk) 12:11, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at
Jerry Tyler
(November 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Voorts was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Seems like an interesting guy, but the sources cited do not establish that he is notable.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
Draft:Jerry Tyler
and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

voorts (talk/contributions) 20:13, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Phil Lelli has been accepted

Phil Lelli, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 21:57, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at
Ron Magden
(November 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiOriginal-9 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Not enough significant coverage in independent sources

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
Draft:Ron Magden
and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 02:41, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at
Jerry Tyler
(November 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gene93k was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Counting the U. Washington history project, the draft needs non-trivial coverage from at least one additional independent reliable source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
Draft:Jerry Tyler
and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

• Gene93k (talk) 02:44, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Ron Magden
has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at

Draft:Ron Magden. Thanks! WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 18:31, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jerry Tyler has been accepted

Jerry Tyler, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 20:16, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ron Magden has been accepted

Ron Magden, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 20:21, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at
1936 Pacific Maritime Strike
has been accepted

1936 Pacific Maritime Strike

, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ca ^{talk to me!} 15:05, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the article 👍 Ca ^{talk to me!} 15:05, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hi and thank you for joinging the WikiProject Organized Labour! We are editors who collaborate to improve the coverage of all matters related to trade unions.

A couple of suggestions:

If you've not done so already, you might wish to add {{User WikiProject Organized Labour}} to your userpage.
You can leave questions or start discussions at the Organized Labour talk page about matters related to the project.
If you feel like doing some clean up; we have a big list.

Once again, welcome. ~~~~

Goldsztajn (talk) 21:39, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Mary Deaton

request

that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

talk) 18:06, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

Your submission at Articles for creation: United States v. Brown has been accepted

United States v. Brown, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Brachy08 _(Talk) 11:03, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A goat for you!

Love your contributions in

WP:LABOR

and all the recent articles you created!

~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 19:59, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Mathieulalie (talk) 20:29, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rosalinda Guillen has been accepted

Rosalinda Guillen, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 06:00, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A goat for you!

It's getting populated! Thanks for the article!

Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 06:06, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mahoney v. Sailors' Union of the Pacific has been accepted

Mahoney v. Sailors' Union of the Pacific, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Toadette ^{(Let's discuss together!)} 07:54, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 1916 West Coast waterfront strike has been accepted

1916 West Coast waterfront strike, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

GnocchiFan (talk) 23:20, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ross Rieder has been accepted

Ross Rieder, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 21:27, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Ross Rieder

Hello, Mathieulalie,

Thank you for creating Ross Rieder.

page curation process

and note that:

Thanks for creating this! Please link this in other articles to de-orphan.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Vanderwaalforces}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the

Teahouse

.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 21:29, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Earl George
has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Earl George. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 06:51, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Your submission at Megan Cornish (June 23)

Draft:Megan Cornish has a new comment

Draft:Megan Cornish has a new comment

Links to draft articles

Your submission at Articles for creation: Megan Cornish has been accepted

Wikipedia and copyright

Your submission at Harold Pritchett (August 26)

Please declare your paid status on talk pages of Drafts and articles

Your submission at Articles for creation: Garry Owens has been accepted

Your submission at Articles for creation: Harold Pritchett has been accepted

Your submission at Jerry Tyler (November 4)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Phil Lelli has been accepted

Your submission at Ron Magden (November 5)

Your submission at Jerry Tyler (November 5)

Draft:Ron Magden has a new comment

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jerry Tyler has been accepted

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ron Magden has been accepted

Your submission at 1936 Pacific Maritime Strike has been accepted

Welcome!

Concern regarding Draft:Mary Deaton

Your submission at Articles for creation: United States v. Brown has been accepted

A goat for you!

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rosalinda Guillen has been accepted

A goat for you!

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mahoney v. Sailors' Union of the Pacific has been accepted

Your submission at Articles for creation: 1916 West Coast waterfront strike has been accepted

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ross Rieder has been accepted

Ways to improve Ross Rieder

AfC notification: Draft:Earl George has a new comment

Your submission at
Megan Cornish
(June 23)

Draft:Megan Cornish
has a new comment

Draft:Megan Cornish
has a new comment

Your submission at
Harold Pritchett
(August 26)

Your submission at
Jerry Tyler
(November 4)

Your submission at
Ron Magden
(November 5)

Your submission at
Jerry Tyler
(November 5)

Draft:Ron Magden
has a new comment

Your submission at
1936 Pacific Maritime Strike
has been accepted

AfC notification: Draft:Earl George
has a new comment