User talk:Mr. Guye/Archive 15
Please comment on Help talk:IPA for English
The
]Please comment on Talk:The Honourable
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:The Honourable. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Cold War II
The
]Please comment on Talk:Mudar Zahran
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Mudar Zahran. Legobot (talk) 00:00, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Oldest people
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Oldest people. Legobot (talk) 00:00, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Political correctness
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Political correctness. Legobot (talk) 00:05, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Watchdog.org
The
]Please comment on Talk:List of ministers of the Universal Life Church
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of ministers of the Universal Life Church. Legobot (talk) 00:00, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Charli XCX
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Charli XCX. Legobot (talk) 00:00, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Jennifer Lawrence
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Jennifer Lawrence. Legobot (talk) 00:00, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Habib Ali al-Jifri
The
]Please comment on Talk:Bill Cosby sexual assault allegations
The
Please comment on Talk:Emmanuel Lemelson
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Emmanuel Lemelson. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Panagiotis Kone
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Panagiotis Kone. Legobot (talk) 00:00, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Draft:Amit Kleinberger concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Amit Kleinberger, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at
Thank you for your attention.
RfC announce: Religion in infoboxes
There is an RfC at Template talk:Infobox#RfC: Religion in infoboxes concerning what should be allowed in the religion entry in infoboxes. Please join the discussion and help us to arrive at a consensus on this issue. --Guy Macon (talk) 22:28, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for your support
Peacemaker67 RfA Appreciation award | |
Thank you for participating and supporting at my RfA. It was very much appreciated, and I am humbled that the community saw fit to trust me with the tools. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 05:56, 6 February 2016 (UTC) |
Thank you for supporting my RfA
Brianhe RfA Appreciation award | |
Thank you for participating at talk) 07:48, 6 February 2016 (UTC) ]
|
Christiane Woopen
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can
soon.
Doubledoc (talk) 12:49, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
Article Review
Hi! Thank you very much for your review on my article, I'm sorry for including terminology that was not impartial. I already removed those terms for the article to be neutral. If you like you can check it out again I would appreciate it. Thank You again! — Preceding unsigned comment added by GaafNahlot (talk • contribs) 03:38, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
Request on 12:19:28, 9 February 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by Yogeshhkulkarni
Please suggest more specifically what needs to be changed. Maybe, one or two examples in the same article will give me a better idea.
Yogeshhkulkarni (talk) 12:19, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
UAA Talk
There is currently a discussion at
Hi Mr. Guye, this is likely not about you but I thought you might be interested. Horseless Headman (talk) 12:56, 16 February 2016 (UTC).
Nomination of Tyler Adkison for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tyler Adkison is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tyler Adkison until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jrcla2 (talk) 19:21, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Reference errors on 1 March
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the Women in government page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a
Would you please adopt me?
Dear Mr Guye-
I feel as though I have been ejected from Titanic and him desperately looking for some flotsam to hold onto.
This is my first attempt at publishing a wiki article. It has gotten more and more convoluted since I started several weeks ago.
I have read all of the guidelines/do's and don'ts/God help you if we catchya's...
Would you please adopt me? I am a very bright intelligent person, a professional writer, self-described a grammar Nazi and vocabulary strumpet. It's just I am tripping myself up on very basic editing efforts that should not in any way be taking me this long for this much effort to figure out. I am frustrated with the tutorials because they seem to endlessly link to other pages. Trying to avoid source editing and keep it basic and simple.
My situation-I was asked to rewrite and update an existing wiki entry. A couple of weeks ago I did. Now I have been asked to add several pictures and expand upon a couple of sections. Somehow, I messed up the source editing, and the article was all catty wompus dis-formatted. a user, via the help desk, assisted me in restoring the article; however it was restored to the original addition, which existed before I joined the project.
Now I am terrified to do anything because I am afraid I will throw the current article into a similar state of disarray. I think I can test edit the article somewhere... my sandbox? so much of the wiki terminology is foreign to me and I am getting frustrated because I can usually grasp a better than average understanding of a program.
My goals are pretty simple for this article; while technically it is my first wiki article, I have a well-written, unbiased, non-advertisement article ready to go. Could you please, pretty please, help me achieve that?
Most sincerely, Kimber O. username: kkimbero wiki article URL: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DMACK
Kkimbero (talk) 03:15, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
- @WP:ADOPTERS. However, I will provide you with some links to Wikipedia help pages. I will post them on your talk page.
- @
- @Kkimbero: Actually, it seems someone else has already posted those links. Also, I've noticed your edits are all in Visual edit. If you are uncomfortable with that, you may want to edit in source mode (click "Edit source" at the top of the page). That is the one I personally am more comfortable with, but maybe it is because I am used to it. I also noticed that you occasionally add "nowiki" markup when you edit. That removes wiki formatting (like from United States to [[United States]]). I would avoid it if you are new.--Mr. Guye (talk) 03:50, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Ella Fitzgerald
Ella Fitzgerald is not even close to being GA standard. It requires a lot of work. Please could you withdraw the nomination? Gareth E. Kegg (talk) 15:18, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
- @]
- I'm the author of the vast majority of the text of the article and I am aware that it is missing so much biographical information, critical, cultural, and musical analysis and references. If you could let us work on the article for a few weeks, it would stand a much better chance of GA. Gareth E. Kegg (talk) 13:41, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
- @Gareth E. Kegg: Ok. I'm satisfied with your answer. I'll withdraw. --Mr. Guye (talk) 18:42, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
- I'm the author of the vast majority of the text of the article and I am aware that it is missing so much biographical information, critical, cultural, and musical analysis and references. If you could let us work on the article for a few weeks, it would stand a much better chance of GA. Gareth E. Kegg (talk) 13:41, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
- @]
Kasey Campbell
Re: Kasey Campbell: Pussycat Dolls There is mention of Kasey Campbell on the "Pussycat Dolls" Wikipedia page. If you google search Kasey Campbell you can find that information. Alongside IMDB. The redirect is legitimate. Check facts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.67.67.87 (talk) 05:47, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
@50.67.67.87: Sorry for the mistake.--Mr. Guye (talk) 22:23, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
About Draft:William Yang
Hi Mr. Guye,
I'm currently attempting to fix up this previously
Your thoughts about this? Pete AU aka--Shirt58 (talk) 11:00, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
You requested speedy deletion of
Blaxtrast Page
I am quite new to this and was wondering to get input on the faults of the page i created? From what i believe, i was typing in a neutral perspective and not a general. I was wondering if i can receive help? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blaxtrast (talk • contribs) 22:55, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
- Thankyou, but i am curious, for instance on celebrity wiki pages and such, i was trying more to create something in that type of form and not a personal page, any suggestions to the edit to make that page more into that type of form? similar to Skrillex's, I'm not entirely sure how to reference his page threw coding but if you search him through here or on my created page i linked it to his page. (Blaxtrast (talk) 23:09, 27 April 2016 (UTC))
April 2016
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to The Legend of Sleepy Hollow may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- shot off by a stray cannonball during [[New York and New Jersey campaign|"some nameless battle"]]{{c of the [[American Revolutionary War]], and who "rides forth to the scene of battle in nightly
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow
Protection
Hey there, thank you for the barnstar, much appreciated. I've semi-protected your pages for a couple of days following the vandalism earlier. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:08, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Re: GolfNow
I've actually been rewriting the article to remove the promotional fluff and make it a bit more informative. I was also the one who reported those two users on UAA. ViperSnake151 Talk 17:06, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Butuan Polysports Complex AfD
Hi there. You AfDd Butuan Polysports Complex. The creator also created Urios Arena. I can't find a thing to support it. Thoughts? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 05:46, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
Polysports Complex and the FSUU Gym
Hi. Those 2 arenas are different locations. The Polysports Complex is at the Brgy. Baan Km. 3, and the FSUU Gym is at the J.C. Aquino Ave., both from
SALAMAT. (thanks.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ronald Galope Barniso (talk • contribs) 08:05, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
I'm curious why you added the peacock template to Sylviidae. The article isn't great, but it doesn't really read like it's trumpeting the importance of the family. Sabine's Sunbird talk 03:16, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
- @Sabine's Sunbird: Removed the "peacock" template. But I added more specific tags within the lead to indicate where there are still problems. --Mr. Guye (talk) 18:31, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
- Cool, I'll look at that. I'd suggest that the statement about the family being a poorly defined wastebin is neutral. No one really disputed that that was the case, it just existed for a long time because no one really knew what else to do with those species (how all such wastebins arise really). Sabine's Sunbird talk 05:44, 4 August 2016 (UTC)