User talk:NiciVampireHeart

This user may have left Wikipedia. NiciVampireHeart has not edited Wikipedia since 7 June 2020. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5 Archive 6 Archive 7 Archive 8 Archive 9 Archive 10 Archive 11 Archive 12 Archive 13 Archive 14 Archive 15 Archive 16 Archive 17 Archive 18 Archive 19 Archive 20 Archive 21 Archive 22 Archive 23 Archive 24 Archive 25 Archive 26 Archive 27 Archive 28 Archive 29 Archive 30 Archive 31 Archive 32 Archive 33 Archive 34 Archive 35

Hi, how are you? Sorry to bother you about it.

There is a graffiti in Sunderland with Raich Carter, here's a link: [1].

I don't know how to do it, so could I please ask you to upload that photo to Wiki? I would like to add it to the

]

WP:NFC for more information. NiciVampireHeart 17:33, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

no — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pennegod (talk • contribs) 18:54, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pennegod You're gonna need to elaborate on that. NiciVampireHeart 21:33, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please see the comment I made about the user’s edit request. IanDBeacon (talk) 15:09, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

IanDBeacon (talk · contribs) The entire section was removed at Talk:Allied Filmmakes, but judging by this message on my talk page, you're not wrong. Thanks for the heads up. NiciVampireHeart 16:11, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

NiciVampireHeart (talk · contribs) No problem, anytime. --IanDBeacon (talk) 03:09, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, can you tell me if you are currently acting as admin for this article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Godwhale (talk • contribs)

@

Admins have extra technical abilities, but are not in charge of content moderation. If you having disagreements with other users, try discussing it on the talk page of the article or their talk pages. NiciVampireHeart 11:07, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

Thanks for the reply and link. I’m familiar with how WP works, its just that I note that recently the article has been subject to ‘semi-protected edit requests,’ most recently on 11th March this year. I have added some text in the discussion page, as I have previously. I would greatly appreciate your thoughts on the points I have made. --Godwhale (talk) 08:45, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Godwhale: edit requests are just that: requests for edits to be made by users who cannot otherwise edit the page. They can be answered by any editor who has the requisite ability to edit the article. As I have the ability to edit semi-protected articles, I go through Category:Wikipedia semi-protected edit requests to see if I can help, which is the limit of my interest in that topic. Thanks for the invitation, but I have no intention of involving myself in the discussions. NiciVampireHeart 11:31, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

One of the major complaints made about WP is that it doesn’t enforce its own rules, allowing militant editors to bully newcomers and make others give up trying to achieve balanced articles because they know it is pointless. This is what has happened here; for years numerous editors have complained about Rjensen, a former major contributor to Conservapedia who uses sock-puppets to back up his arguments and wear people down by sheer bloody-minded attrition. Yet nothing is ever done to control his behavior and he is left alone to work with other militant editors to turn previously balanced articles into nationalistic BS. This article was far better ten years ago and as before, the points I have made on the talk page will be ignored because they know perfectly well they have no defence. I don't really understand why you would bother to become an admin and then not want to even try to deal with this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7F:1888:300:E599:B6A:B450:874D (talk) 07:32, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not an admin. I'm also not American, and couldn't care less about the American Revolution. As such, I have no idea of the clashing viewpoints on this article. I have no intention of getting involved in this, so please find somebody else's talk page to make your points on. NiciVampireHeart 12:02, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I just wanted to say. 125.212.220.48 (talk) 18:00, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Charming. Who are you? NiciVampireHeart 19:18, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

= 125.212.220.48 (talk) 20:00, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Impressive for a dead woman. Don't forget to close the basement door behind you darling. NiciVampireHeart 20:39, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It's me dear and I just wanted to tell that your a disappointment me and likely always will be. 125.212.220.48 (talk) 20:48, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"your a disappointment me"? Honey, you're disappointing me something fierce right now. No English lessons in Vietnam? Shame. NiciVampireHeart 20:50, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It's me again. 103.4.30.79 (talk) 21:02, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ni hao. How long do you plan on keeping this up? --NikkeKatski [Elite] (talk) 21:47, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dunno, with the way you keep leaving me messages, I'm feeling very loved. You're so sweet! NiciVampireHeart 22:03, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WikiJaguar noises --NikkeKatski [Elite] (talk) 15:56, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello NiciVampireHeart, Thank you for responding so quickly to my attempt to add 4 four school shootings to the

. I made the changes you suggested and titled the subject "Change === 2000s === to include four more school shootings & sources." I would greatly appreciate your expertise with Wikipedia if you could take a look in order to make sure I formatted it correctly this time.

Here is the direct link to the talk page:

Sincerely, NabuThoth — Preceding unsigned comment added by NabuThoth (talk • contribs) 12:45, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the clarification, I also made a requested on the page you indicated. Zerbey (talk) 18:29, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

In case you wish to comment... Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Taemak. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 06:12, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the note, but I don't have anything to add. NiciVampireHeart 07:46, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hey sweetie. Just a little reminder that I inserted your name into the Missing Wikipedians list after over a whopping 96000+ contributions here. Please delete yourself from the aforementioned listing if you ever come back.

Best wishes,

69.126.32.189 (talk) 20:15, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Eh, thanks random internet stranger, but I'm not "missing" – I was gone for less than two weeks! I notice your edit to

WP:MIA was reverted for the same reason. Also, in future, please don't call me "sweetie" – Nici or my full user name is fine. Thanks, NiciVampireHeart 03:15, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply ]

Evs

What is tha disaster movement — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2409:4043:19d:d718:881c:13b1:73bc:36a4 (talk • contribs)

I really have no idea what you mean. Can you reword that into something coherent please? NiciVampireHeart 03:09, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there,

My apologies in regards to not providing sources for the suggested amend to the Sir Ernest Shackleton article - I have responded on the talk page with articles to support now. Could you please advise if these are sufficient? Many thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ljmacdonald92 (talk • contribs)

Sure, I'll have a look shortly. NiciVampireHeart 03:10, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you - also thank you for the welcome message and guidance. Much appreciated. Ljmacdonald92 (talk) 13:22, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello NiciVampireHeart! I'm sorry to disturb you. Sorry for my English. Please help me defend the honor of martial artist Bruce Lee. The page dedicated to Bruce Lee was corrected by unscrupulous personalities and they removed the line “martial artist” in it. I tried to just fix it. But my corrections were quickly removed and said that Bruce Lee is not a master. With mockery, they asked me to personally prove to them that Bruce Lee is a master. And I began to prove it in the discussion. To prove something that does not need evidence for a long time ago. I spent 5 sleepless nights to find reputable sources and, moreover, the opinions of real experts on Bruce Lee's account. I have provided a million arguments. You yourself can see them. But they still don’t want to understand me. I am writing to you from Russia, all this happens on the Russian Wikipedia branch, on the Russian page dedicated to Bruce Lee. She is not protected in any way. And none of the Russian participants comes to my aid. At the moment, they refuse to fully recognize him as martial artists. I ask them to acknowledge the fact of the world and write it in the preamble without any unnecessary comments that they personally added now, they belittle it as a master. I want everything to be like the English version of Bruce Lee's Wikipedia page. Everything is well written there. Please, help. AfighterN (talk) 21:42, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply ]

Good article nominations | July 2021 Backlog Drive
July 2021 Backlog Drive: This Thursday, July 1, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number, length, and age, of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here .
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 10+ good article reviews or participated in the March backlog drive. Click here to opt out of any future messages. --Usernameunique

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:31, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Shawn Michaels, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. --Whiteguru (talk) 12:29, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Jared Leto in Dublin 2008.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused, poor quality image, no foreseeable encyclopedic use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pkbwcgs (talk) 20:54, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations | January 2022 Backlog Drive
January 2022 Backlog Drive: On New Year's Day, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number and age of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here .
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage.
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 10+ good article reviews or participated in the March backlog drive. Click here and remove your username from the mailing list to opt out of any future messages. --Usernameunique

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles at 21:18, 31 December 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Good article nominations | June 2022 Backlog Drive

On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number and age of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? Sign up here !

You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives. Click here to opt out of any future messages. (t · c) buidhe 04:26, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Matt Hardy has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Onegreatjoke (talk) 19:47, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article that been involved with (The Usos) has content that is proposed to be removed and moved to another article (Jey Uso). If you are interested, please visit the discussion. Thank you. Summerslam2022 (talk) 22:52, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dolph Ziggler has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 00:34, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Beth Phoenix has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 02:46, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hardcore Holly has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Spinixster (chat!) 06:28, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]