User talk:Pickersgill-Cunliffe

Archives

1, 2

I added inline citations. Is the problem considered solved? Starlighsky (talk) 02:23, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Starlighsky: Hi! Looks like you've got inline citations for everything apart from the sections "Abbey Theatre Productions" and "Characters". The former of those certainly needs a citation. Also, you cite Wikipedia for references #2 and #8. Per Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a reliable source, we don't cite articles to other Wikipedia articles. If you want to use the information found on those other articles, you need to use the references the articles are cited with rather than the articles themselves. Thanks, Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 02:34, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I just noticed that as well. I am fixing it at this very moment. Starlighsky (talk) 02:43, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, happy to meet you. My question is; if you edit in one place does that correct the error in every place it's mentioned? --Karl Narasky (talk) 05:40, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Karl Narasky: Hello, welcome to Wikipedia! When you edit an article everybody who looks at that article will also be able to see that change, but it is not transferred between articles. Thanks, Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 09:05, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have added references to 1766 in russia so could you check it and move it back Changeworld1984 (talk) 18:57, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Changeworld1984: Hi! You recreated the page after it was draftified, so the article doesn't need moving anywhere. Thanks for adding those references! Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 18:59, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Actually I also tried moving the page and it showed that both destination have same name so I assumed you put some restriction. Changeworld1984 (talk) 19:02, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Doug's work in leading organisation in web literacy (Mozilla and Moodle) alongside a current leader in open badges and his PhD and subsequent work in a very current field digital literacy, alongside his Book which although self published ( this is in connection to his work of open practice) I think information on him and his field of expertise is worthy to be included in Wikipedia. Apologies I wasnt clear in my initial edit why I was created the page - does that help AProcter GB eng (talk) 16:48, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@AProcter GB eng: Hi! You need to post this on the talk page for the article (Talk:Doug Belshaw) where it can be reviewed properly. Admins won't check my talk page here. Thanks, Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 16:51, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

thanks did it :) AProcter GB eng (talk) 16:53, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well they deleted it without even replying to me on the talk page. AProcter GB eng (talk) 19:07, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reverting your edit. I really appreciate it! Avishai11 (talk) 20:00, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to correct errors included on Renee Hobbs page about her federal grant from the Department of Homeland Security.

/* Censorship & Propaganda Controversy */  I would like to remove false and misleading information from the poor-quality source (Media Research Center and Daily Wire) and replaced it with more reliable information from the Boston Globe and Providence Business News.

Courageous Rhode Island

When the U.S. federal government identified media literacy as a strategy to help reduce the fear and hate that leads to violence, Professor Hobbs developed Courageous Rhode Island.^[1] Three programs included:

Courageous Conversations: dialogue and discussion program for adults, addressing topics including preventing violent extremism; hate speech, free speech and censorship; conflict entrepreneurs, influencers; and preventing radicalization.

Courageous Professional Development: a program for middle-school, high school and college educators exploring how to integrate media literacy, active listening, kindness and compassion, and community engagement.

Courageous Youth Media Contest: a program for middle-school, high school, and college students involving media production in print, video, audio, and graphic design.

Of the 22 programs held for Courageous Conversations, 81% of participants reported that they were able to use what they learned in the program in everyday life.

On January 17, 2024, The Media Research Center, "one of the most active and best funded" conservative media outlets, published a report on Courageous RI that is critical of the use of federal funds for anti-disinformation education programs, accusing the program of political bias.^[2] Within days, the conservative media ecosystem re-published their report to dozens of right-wing websites. Naynay2024 (talk) 20:18, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are a remarkable editor in many ways. You would be a good administrator, in my opinion, and appear to be well qualified. You personify an administrator without tools and have gained my support already!

Maliner (talk) 11:48, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Might not have enough GAs ;-) –Novem Linguae (talk) 00:16, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously - you're well qualified. If you decide you want to stand for RFA; I'd be willing to be a co-nominator. Hog Farm _Talk 00:47, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Do it. (If you want to, of course...)

^Queenof_Hearts 15:44, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

+1 ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 16:45, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I looked at some of your recent AIV and AFD reports. I think you'd do well with the tools. I'm not sure if you're interested in working at the noticeboards, but I'll say that the tools are pretty helpful on the content side: deleting copyvios, blocking obvious vandals, changing long-forgotten protections so you can move stuff. Sounds small, but being able to do that yourself gets things done faster while also avoiding adding to backlogs. I hope you consider it! — Wug·a·po·des 00:27, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you decide to apply, I wish you all the best and will add my support too but please consider how administrative work might draw you away from creating quality content. --Ykraps (talk) 07:40, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks all for your kind words and I'll keep that in mind Hog Farm! I'll be less active in February because of work, but we'll see what the future holds. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 12:18, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Are you still intending to put HMS Beaulieu up for FAC? I noticed you've stopped polishing it. --Ykraps (talk) 07:45, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ykraps: Hi, I don't have anything left on my to-do list for Beaulieu, am just waiting for the right moment to nominate now. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 12:19, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have some comments and was wondering whether to leave them on your talk page or save them for the review. If you are posting it soon, I would prefer to wait. I know that seems counter-productive but I dislike turning up at FAC and supporting without having anything else to say. I have seen others do this and it always makes me wonder how much consideration they’ve given nomination. --Ykraps (talk) 15:52, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ykraps: Hi, have now put Beaulieu up, so please feel free to comment! Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 15:49, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For the Ćelinovac page I added that sentence since if you look up the article Poles in Bosnia, It says they settled in Ćelinovac. 2600:1702:5730:D1E0:45FC:107F:E694:423A (talk) 17:44, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please ensure that you include a citation from a reliable source when you add information to a Wikipedia article. Saying that another article has the fact is not enough. Thanks, Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 17:46, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank youuuh Dikita club (talk) 16:21, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Plls help me? Dikita club (talk) 16:21, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, you first need to learn the basics of editing. When you add content to a Wikipedia article, make sure you are providing

reliable sources. Thanks, Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 16:27, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

A toast sandwich for you!

New Wiki contributor thanking you for your review of the first page created. Much work to still get done. Learning by doing. Wikibobfl (talk) 21:35, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've

criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:41, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've

criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:42, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

The Bugle: Issue 214, February 2024

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 and Pickersgill-Cunliffe review four books

Hi, l am sepalx and l've just signed up in wikipedia. I wanna know how to add a new article about some writers or artists which are always under an obligatory silence in my country. If you direct me, it will be a big help and kind of you. --Sepalx (talk) 09:52, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And my second question is if l want to find sources which are trustable for wikipedia how should l know what kind of persian sources are confident for wikipedia? Is it possible for you to give me or direct me to a list of these sources? --Sepalx (talk) 11:33, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@

notability. When it comes to which sources you should use, they should always be reliable and verifiable. There is a list here of sources that editors frequently use, labelling whether they're appropriate or not. I have no experience with Persian sources, but if you're worried about whether a particular source is reliable or not you can post about it here. Thanks, Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 12:35, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

January 2024 NPP backlog drive – Points award

		The Order of the Superior Scribe of Wikipedia
		This award is given in recognition to Pickersgill-Cunliffe for collecting more than 500 points during the January 2024 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions played a part in the 16,070 reviews completed during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to help reduce the backlog! Hey man im josh (talk) 22:31, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024 NPP backlog drive – Streak award

		Unnecessarily complicated Gears Award
		This award is given in recognition to Pickersgill-Cunliffe for collecting at least 150 points during each week of the January 2024 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions played a part in the 16,070 reviews completed during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to help reduce the backlog! Hey man im josh (talk) 23:01, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can You Expand For Me Thanks. --TysWorld (talk) 14:06, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@TysWorld: Hello, as you haven't asked a specific question I can't help you. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 17:37, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is It Possible To Expand. --TysWorld (talk) 19:04, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I am new here, and I want to know how I should start writing in tech. --Sourcingsquare (talk) 14:57, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@

reliable sources. Thanks, Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 17:12, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

Sarfarajshadiwan1 --Sarfarajshadiwan1 (talk) 05:44, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Sarfarajshadiwan1: Hello, feel free to ask me any questions you have about Wikipedia. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 15:04, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You took down my post I do not appreciate this. I imagine only a Torrie would do such a thing shame on you. 168.102.132.39 (talk) 17:03, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted your edit because you provided a wholly uncited paragraph claiming that the President of Peru taught Mussolini how to create the National Fascist Party. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 17:09, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have responded to the edit block and am deeply ashamed at your stance as it is clearly an outmoded viewpoint or you've been lazy and haven't really looked at what you're doing. Wikipedia is a useful sight and my edit was intended to keep it this way. Failure to include my edit in future will be looked into outside of Wikipedia and management will be looking for you to shine by taking a mature approach and not leaving up dangerous articles for the sake of being idiosyncratic and self-deluding. We are lucky to have Wikipedia. We do not own the internet nor do we own the law enforcement agencies that set the rules on what is and what is not the promotion of hate, terrorism and illegal warfare.

This being so, the matter is out of my hands. My IP represents a block of many users (I have looked into this previously) and I am aware that the IP gives this to approximately half its customers and therefore it is not one single end-user you are blocking but a portion of the internet users of an entire country who will now find their IP displayed as being blocked on a Russia article when they wake up in a few hours from now. As I said, I don't set the rules, I just abide by them.

I have clearly indicated that I am prepared to cooperate on you with this matter and proceed with appropriate articles published online. Wikipedia is not a charity that gives second chances to dictators or aggressors in illegal wars or terrorists. You have chosen to put yourself in a position of responsibility and are expected to act accordingly. You have after all put your name to what you do and I'm sure you realise you will be held to account and already know this because you follow the law. This is not a last chance saloon and you will indeed be held to account if you continue to facilitate the publishing online of content that seeks to glorify scheduled entities or individuals.

Please see the error of your way and include my edit which will indemnify you of all responsibility for the tosh that currently is be bandied around by people that presumably need to breath some fresh air, stretch their legs and do whatever it is they need to function properly as individuals instead of them constantly obsessively tinkering with these articles adding extraneous and now obsolete information bellying the fact that they currently have neither journalistic capability or even an understanding of their audience.

It has been a pleasure conversing with you and I am glad that you are enthusiastic about what you and that you take the time to read and respond to others in the community and that you are an upstanding citizen that we will be seeing much more of around here as progress is made with the issues that we both find we are passionate about addressing. 148.252.146.215 (talk) 22:57, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, you have not been blocked. Thanks, Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 22:58, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, something I actually don't understand, reverting my article change which was something I have considered quite carefully and have found myself at pains to be in this situation but it is the reality. It follows on from reading articles that don't even acknowledge companies pulling out of Russia but INSTEAD include them when they have already gone. I have done my research on the situation and this seems to be an issue and I am editing for this purpose as I have found Wikipedia to be in a dire state time and again with excessive and outdated content that frankly sometimes crosses into extremism. If I had a website effectively promoting sanctioned entities or individuals I would expect it to be taken down. We don't need information on how to interact with the Russian war machine which is all these articles are doing. We are in this situation RIGHT NOW, it is a WAR and there are laws to follow from our viewpoint in not aiding 'those sanctioned', in any way, including things such as operating server space for articles detailing unsubstantiated internal workings of a sanctioned entity (here the Russian state and the may individuals also). I couldn't be more clear. The next step is Wikipedia is taken down and has to ask to be returned. Prior to this the unpleasant process of investigations by the multi agency authorities on who's doing what and potentially individuals finding themselves under investigation and subject to the full force of the law, for what might have seemed being lazy in one's duties as an affiliate at an article website. This is happening right now, time is limited, will you rise to the challenge and take responsibility for appropriate content or become the focus and subject of a spectrum of ire from law enforcement all the way to the man in the street? Only you can do this. This will not brushed off by the state as laymen tinkering on the internet oblivious to reality just playing with 'chunks of data', tables and newspaper cuttings of subjects they know nothing of and hold no insight into. I can imagine the questions: "so, you just happened to overrule someone's attempt to protect the public from both becoming at risk from holding an understanding of information likely to benefit an enemy (aka treason) and simultaneously facilitating the gathering and reproduction of information likely to be useful to those wishing to commit treason and support acts of terrorism?". To which you would reply what? My finger slipped and I just happened to type all that stuff in response, click all the necessary moderator buttons to wreck the situation for public safety again, make myself a Nescafe and watch the birds rise in the morning after a night of dullifying oneself staring at the internet for hours pretending I'm not actually state educated and didn't do well in school, but just happened upon the WWW whereby suddenly I was trajected into overseer of mere minions of information not-understood by their layman ways but they can't possibly understand how this is because we can't say they were aware they didn't do well in school, and if they didn't, then surely they have no concept of what an education is as they don't really have much of a one? I don't know where you're going with this, dude but perhaps take a break. The world will be here tomorrow, it relies on individuals like you letting things go sometimes and allowing others to step in where you need someone's delegated independence to shine through so you can bask in that and say you managed to get through it and were part of something that meant something and not another crank being chased by the state and having to take your chances out there but be a part of the community and say you got through this, times were times, you rise above it and you progress on, on the side that matters, on the side that has something worth talking about and something that will last long enough for hyphenated surnames to continue to flourish and a seed that will continue on instead of getting washed away to the horrors of hell. Satan looks for assistants that he can abuse and who abuse others. People join him thinking they are getting rewarded but in fact are damned for eternity, worthless and soulless unable to escape but in constant torment unable to die like they once did but forced to go over it again and again, no end in sight, no pleasure, no soothing, no sympathy. 148.252.146.215 (talk) 23:45, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies, but I won't be reading your wall of text. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 23:48, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

tldr: there's a war going on, you are the chosen one, they are the devil, we are the not that

...or something like that. i'm trying to translate it from kingdom hearts lingo, but this is all i got cogsan _{(nag me) (stalk me)} 00:07, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK does this seem normal to you? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w2iysafhiXM

Please don't revert my edits, unless I genuinely make a mistake in grammar.

I am being critical of you for refusing to limit the display of information on Russian companies / business as normal. Please see the video. 148.252.146.215 (talk) 17:37, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I am new to Wikipedia, and am a n00b at editing. Can you teach me? --TROLLFACE ProblemBro? (talk) 23:14, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@TROLLFACE ProblemPro?: Hi, welcome to Wikipedia! Your best place to start will be here. If you have any specific questions I'd be happy to answer them. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 23:17, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You revered the fix - ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Hi, I am Dumbeldoor, not to be confused with Dumbledore --Albus Percival Wulfric Brian Dumbeldoor (talk) 16:55, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That was a way to get attention, but I'm realizing maybe there were other ways just as fast and simple, sorry. However, I hope you've got the message. There's a person actively insisting to add wrong infos to Erg Chigaga's page.

Have a good day, bye. 79.12.109.24 (talk) 17:17, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stephen Beresford

Nicholas Hytner did not direct this play. I worked on the production. The late Howard Davies directed it. Please credit him.

If you require further confirmation, esteemed theatre critic Michael Billington gets it right in his contemporary review in The Guardian: "As always, however, director Howard Davies gets luminous performances from his cast."

https://www.theguardian.com/stage/2012/jun/20/last-of-the-haussmans-review 82.8.146.85 (talk) 06:44, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I reverted your edit because you provided no source or edit summary with your change and I assumed it to be vandalism. If you would like to edit with sources to back your change, please do. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 12:54, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Pickersgill-Cunliffe,

I am StivinTaesoo. I have read through much of wikipedia guide in order to acquaint myself with the policy. I have also read your conversations and gained quite some insights and I look forward to learn more form your experience. Thank you. StivinTaesoo (talk) 09:36, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		The Copyright Cleanup Barnstar
		Thank you for helping out at CCI. Your help is greatly appreciated! Keep up the good work :) MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 19:46, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I was looking for an article I was working with and can't find it --ATR2147 (talk) 23:29, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@ATR2147: Hi, your account only has one edit so I assume you weren't editing logged in. If you definitely saved your content (whether that was as a draft, user page, or article) then it will be present somewhere. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 23:31, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I believe I was logged in, as I never logged off. Also thanks,I didn't realize I did not have editing privileges. ATR2147 (talk) 23:33, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your essential and inspirational contribution in rollbacking vandalism. 14 novembre (talk) 21:03, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the kind words! Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 00:32, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop reverting: there's no point and it just means there's more for the admins to clean up. 199.80.8.254 (talk) 21:07, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• But if you have a moment, maybe you can revert the last three edits at Jihadist flag? Thanks. 199.80.8.254 (talk) 21:08, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Thanks! 199.80.8.254 (talk) 21:10, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Happy to help. Please note that I will continue to revert vandalism where the edits will result in random visitors to the page seeing offensive language or anything similar to that. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 21:11, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Well, again, look at those edits: they're all scrubbed now, and the vandal got the satisfaction of seeing them a half a dozen times. Perhaps you'll start recognizing this one--he's well known--and think twice about reverting. Calling for an immediate block on ANI, AIV, or IRC is much more helpful. 199.80.8.254 (talk) 21:14, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

      I am reporting on AIV. :) Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 21:15, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article HMS Assurance (1780) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:HMS Assurance (1780) for comments about the article, and Talk:HMS Assurance (1780)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 23:23, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article HMS Magpie (1826) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:HMS Magpie (1826) for comments about the article, and Talk:HMS Magpie (1826)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 23:24, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've

criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Johannes Schade -- Johannes Schade (talk) 11:01, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've

criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:24, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply

Hello, I've just created an account and created (I think) my first wikipedia page, about the artist Enos Lovatt. I did it in the sandbox, then clicked on 'Publish'. I now can't find it again as a sandbox draft, and the article hasn't appeared online yet. Should I wait for it to appear, or does it sound like I've already done something wrong? Once it's live, I'm going to have a go at adding some images and links to names of other people mentioned to their wiki pages. Does that sound OK? Many thanks. --Sam Pond (talk) 14:22, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@

reliable sources

.

I would suggest for your first article, when you think it is ready to publish you go through the

verifiable through the use and referencing to reliable sources. Please make sure you are including such in your work in the future, and do not copy and paste work from another source again. Thanks, Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 14:34, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

Many thanks, that's very helpful. Understood. Sam Pond (talk) 14:37, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've

criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Ealdgyth -- Ealdgyth (talk) 21:03, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply

The article

The article HMS Actaeon (1778) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:HMS Actaeon (1778) for comments about the article, and Talk:HMS Actaeon (1778)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 23:25, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, how do I do visual editing? --Cr7isDaGOAT (talk) 06:03, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Cr7isDaGOAT: If you already have VisualEdtior enabled (done at Special:Preferences) then Help:VisualEditor will get you started. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 20:26, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

日本語にする方法 --Fujimon22 (talk) 08:00, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Fujimon22: You might prefer the Japanese Wikipedia which is located at ja.wikipedia.org. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 20:24, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Thanks so much for your assistance. I submitted an article for a draft. I am not a professional writer or editor and have been mentored by an professor from OWL Purdue, who taught bee the benefits of drafting ideas out and getting things close to finalize and utilizing ai tools to further develop the draft? I was wondering how you felt about that and also things I can do to improve my grammar writing and other abilities. I was also hoping to receive all of the feedback you had to offer for a draft writing material I was doing for an artist, whenever you had the opportunity to do so. I used AI of revisions and was hoping you could let me know what you think about the crafting. I tried to do my best to cite, however conducting multiple research and trying to change language can be exhausting especially when this is not my main form or medium. I appreciate your support and thank you so much for offering this assistance to myself and others wanting to build and expand. --ATR2147 (talk) 23:04, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, how can I update a company logo? --Harri Karppinen (talk) 11:36, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

copyright violation. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 22:43, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

Hey sir I am new wiki editor from Nepal how should I start my journey.Do you have some suggestion for me please mention it. --Shishirjaisi (talk) 12:20, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This page has a number of introductions and overviews about editing Wikipedia. You might also find The Wikipeia Adventure to be a nice place to start. Remember, whatever you're doing to begin with, don't be scared to start small with your work. Get comfortable with Wikipedia, add citations, or perhaps fix spelling errors. Don't run before you can walk! Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 22:46, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 and Nick-D look at four recent works

The article

The article John Marshall (Royal Navy officer, born 1785) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:John Marshall (Royal Navy officer, born 1785) for comments about the article, and Talk:John Marshall (Royal Navy officer, born 1785)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Ealdgyth -- Ealdgyth (talk) 16:50, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you today for Charles Richardson (Royal Navy officer), "a Royal Navy officer who served in the French Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars, eventually reaching the rank of vice-admiral. While most of Richardson's fellow admirals gained the majority of their experience at sea, Richardson found his calling on land, managing to fight in several British Army campaigns. Richardson was also a successful naval commander when he found time to be so, commanding six warships. He continued in the navy after the end of the wars, ending his career in rather strange circumstances surrounding a diplomatic incident in China."! -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:28, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

Royal Navy officers

Thank you for quality articles around the Royal Navy in the 18th century, such as Charles Richardson (Royal Navy officer), Maurice Suckling and Thomas Hardy (Royal Navy officer, died 1732), for Esther Acklom, for quality reviewing, for missing friends, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

You are recipient no.

Thank you, that's very kind. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 00:26, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've

criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:22, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply

why does it say that the edit is destructive even though its not? --Thatguyismangor32 (talk) 02:19, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, Pickersgill-Cunliffe! The article you nominated, HMS Beaulieu, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Gog the Mild (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:05, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

thank you!! Editing on wiki is a little hard and not intuitive lol --Apurnuh (talk) 23:12, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Apurnuh: It's a learning curve for everyone! Some editors have attempted to make the process easier and more comfortable. You might find something like The Wikipedia Adventure useful. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 10:03, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article

The article Maidstone-class frigate you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Maidstone-class frigate for comments about the article, and Talk:Maidstone-class frigate/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 21:21, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Thomas Howard, 5th Duke of Norfolk you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Thomas Howard, 5th Duke of Norfolk for comments about the article, and Talk:Thomas Howard, 5th Duke of Norfolk/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Johannes Schade -- Johannes Schade (talk) 21:21, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

hello. how do i add a biography of my boss and his construction company --MMContractorszm (talk) 09:04, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@

conflict of interest. Please see the message that has already been left on your talk page about the steps to take in regards to this. Thanks, Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 13:01, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

A barnstar for you!

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Awarded for persistence in combatting vandalism, for keeping a keen eye on articles and for consistently reverting edits where necessary. SpookiePuppy (talk) 17:28, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've

criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Hawkeye7 -- Hawkeye7 (talk) 22:22, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply

The article Gerald Marescaux you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Gerald Marescaux for comments about the article, and Talk:Gerald Marescaux/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Hawkeye7 -- Hawkeye7 (talk) 23:41, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For your efforts.

– DreamRimmer (talk) 16:48, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Pickersgill-Cunliffe,

Backlog update: The October drive reduced the article backlog from 11,626 to 7,609 and the redirect backlog from 16,985 to 6,431! Congratulations to Schminnte, who led with over 2,300 points.

Following that, New Page Patrol organized another backlog drive for articles in January 2024. The January drive started with 13,650 articles and reduced the backlog to 7,430 articles. Congratulations to JTtheOG, who achieved first place with 1,340 points in this drive.

Looking at the graph, it seems like backlog drives are one of the only things keeping the backlog under control. Another backlog drive is being planned for May. Feel free to participate in the May backlog drive planning discussion.

It's worth noting that both queues are gradually increasing again and are nearing 14,034 articles and 22,540 redirects. We encourage you to keep contributing, even if it's just a single patrol per day. Your support is greatly appreciated!

2023 Awards

Onel5969 won the 2023 cup with 17,761 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 50/day. There was one Platinum Award (10,000+ reviews), 2 Gold Awards (5000+ reviews), 6 Silver (2000+), 8 Bronze (1000+), 30 Iron (360+) and 70 more for the 100+ barnstar. Hey man im josh led on redirect reviews by clearing 36,175 of them. For the full details, see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone for their efforts in reviewing!

WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers deployed the rewritten NewPagesFeed in October, and then gave the NewPagesFeed a slight visual facelift in November. This concludes most major work to Special:NewPagesFeed, and most major work by the WMF Moderator Tools team, who wrapped up their major work on PageTriage in October. The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers will continue small work on PageTriage as time permits.

Recruitment: A couple of the coordinators have been inviting editors to become reviewers, via mass-messages to their talk pages. If you know someone who you'd think would make a good reviewer, then a personal invitation to them would be great. Additionally, if there are Wikiprojects that you are active on, then you can add a post there asking participants to join NPP. Please be careful not to double invite folks that have already been invited.

Reviewing tip: Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages within their most familiar subjects can use the regularly updated NPP Browser tool.

Reminders:

• You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Pages Patrol Discord.
• Consider adding the project discussion page to your watchlist.
• To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:27, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Pickersgill-Cunliffe, thank you for volunteering to be a host at the Teahouse. We really appreciate your willingness to help! However, we see that you are pretty new around here and have not edited very much in mainspace yet. It takes a lot of time, background knowledge and patience to answer new editors' questions effectively. So you should probably edit for a while longer before you sign up to be a host. That said, you're still very welcome to answer those questions that you can, and we hope you continue to participate and spread the word about the Teahouse to other new Wikipedians. Come back soon!

Remsense诉 15:01, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm..! Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 15:04, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		Editor of the Week
		Your ongoing efforts to improve the encyclopedia have not gone unnoticed: You have been selected as Wikipedia Editor Retention Project )

I nominate Pickersgill-Cunliffe to be Editor of the Week for persistent quality content contributions and their milhist coordination work. As of now, they've helped to promote over 70 articles to Good Article status and 4 articles to Featured Article status, 2 of which they created. Additionally, they have been a quality contributor and coordinator at the military history WikiProject since October of 2022. Their contributions (over 20000 mainspace edits) to the site are always of the utmost quality and they are always easily approachable. I think they should be commended and properly recognized for all that they do. This nomination was seconded by Mr Serjeant Buzfuz and Ixtal.

You can copy the following text to your user page to display a user box proclaiming your selection as Editor of the Week:

{{User:UBX/EoTWBox}}

Member of the Maritime warfare task force

Pickersgill-Cunliffe

Editor of the Week for the week beginning April 7, 2024

A persistent quality content contributions. They have helped to promote over 70 articles to Good Article status and at least 4 articles to Featured Article status, 2 of which they created. They have been a quality contributor and coordinator at the military history WikiProject since October of 2022. Their contributions (over 20000 mainspace edits) to the site are always of the utmost quality and they are always easily approachable.

Recognized for

their Military History coordination work

Submit a nomination

Thanks again for your efforts! Buster Seven Talk (UTC) 12:40, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats! Much deserved :D — ♠Ixtal ^{( T / C )} ⁂ Non nobis solum. ♠ 13:28, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much all! A kind nomination and one I appreciate deeply. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 13:51, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7, Nick-D and Pickersgill-Cunliffe discuss six (count 'em, six!) works comprising eight volumes Op-ed: Hawkeye7 on a lecture by the Australian official historian

Hello,

I would like to find out how to create a Article for our Motorcycle Club Yarmulke Riders Motorcycle Club.

I see that Wikipedia has all kinds of other articles about other Motorcycle Clubs.

We would like to add one for our Motorcycle Club which would list who we are, how we started, when we started, and basically a Truthful History of our Motorcycle Club that is based on FACTS, Not advertising.

We have a whole History already written out of you would like to look over it and let us know how we can add it to Wikipedia.

This would mean a lot as we, The Yarmulke Riders Motorcycle Club is Wisconsin's 1st And Only Official Jewish Motorcycle Club since 2005 A.D..... We made History with founding our Club as there were No other Jewish Motorcycle Clubs in Wisconsin before us.

We even have documentation from The United States Government and a United States Senator to confirm this.

We would be more than willing to send in this documentation to provide all of this.

Please let me know if this is possible.

We just want to let the World know about our motorcycle club, our History since we are Wisconsin's 1st And Only Official Jewish Motorcycle Club, and the facts.

Thank You for your Time. May God Bless all --OfficialYarmulkeRidersMotorcycleClub (talk) 22:15, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia strives for

this page about conflicts of interest before you write anything on Wikipedia. Failing to properly disclose your conflict and edit neutrally could result in you being blocked. Furthermore, your username is currently a violation of the username policy because it might be deemed a promotional username, and you seem to be representing a group rather than yourself as an individual. This isn't allowed. Please look into changing your username

as soon as you can.

If you follow these steps and begin editing on Wikipedia,

verifiable. Content you add about any subject that is not deemed notable, or that is not accompanied by reliable sources that are independent of the subject, are liable to be deleted. Thanks, Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 09:07, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

Hi there, I’ve tried to have an article published but have had it declined as I need to change a word in the heading. I can’t seem to do it nor find how to. Draft article is titled Touch Football in New Zealand which is the common name for the sport but was declined because it’s also called Touch Rugby which is what they want it changed to. Am Happy to do this but can’t find the edit tab to complete it --Touchfinatik (talk) 19:56, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On the top right of the page is a tab called "Page". In this dropdown menu is an option called "Move" which is where you can choose to change the name of a page. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 21:54, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Aviram7, I've scrutinized my draft page and worked to ensure that I have provided a significant number of links to show "significant coverage" of Case to highlight the fact that he is truly notable in his industry. Can you, or Pickersgill-Cunliffe" look at me draft and approve it? If you cannot approve can you five me some mentoring on what it will take to get it approved. We've worked really hard to make it unbiased and we believe that we've achieved that with this latest submission. Thank you for your support! --Cmlaw10 (talk) 21:17, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ‪Pickersgill-Cunliffe‬ I'm in University and starting to become a scientist. I'm ready to slowly starting with editing, but I'm not in a hurry.

Greetings Modemacher. --Modemacher (talk) 09:37, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome! Feel free to ask me any questions you have. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 12:08, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol | May 2024 Articles Backlog Drive
On 1 May 2024, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each review will earn 1 point. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:15, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		Military history reviewers' award
		On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the The Milhist reviewing award (2 stripes) for participating in 7 reviews between January and March 2024. Hawkeye7 (talk) via MilHistBot (talk) 04:28, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply] Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste {{WPMILHIST Review alerts}} to your user space