User talk:Ppgardne

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

License tagging for Image:Yeast.png

Thanks for uploading

image description page
indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 16:13, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

WP:AUK

WikiProject Auckland This is an invitation to WikiProject Auckland, a WikiProject which aims to develop and expand Wikipedia's articles on Auckland. Please feel free to join us.

Taifarious1 04:47, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to

talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 18:40, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for Image:SAM riboswitch pdb-2gis.png

Thanks for uploading

here
- just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 20:08, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for Image:Guanosine riboswitch pdb-1y27.png

Thanks for uploading

here
- just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 20:14, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:NcRNAs-central-dogma.svg

Thanks for uploading

this list, click on this link
, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 05:42, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Landes/RNAbiology

Hi there! I found you via this page after seeing a post on AN. We're putting together a wikiproject for reaching out to exactly that sort of new editor

talkpage, or dropped by my talkpage, to talk about it. //roux   07:23, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Image tagging for File:HAR1F RF00635 rna secondary structure.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:HAR1F RF00635 rna secondary structure.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 10:06, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:6C RNA secondary structure sequence conservation.jpg

Thanks for uploading

this list, click on this link
, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:08, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Telomerase articles merge

hello, and thanks for the suggestion to restructure the Telomerase related articles.

but.. could you please add a discussion section at an appropriate talk page for this proposed multiway merge - and check that the templates are showing what you intended them to show, which I think they are not?

I closed a year-old merge request a month or two back because nobody'd bothered to talk about it since the merge tags were placed, and I as a layman thought the articles' subjects were a bit different - if, in your opinion, the merge is needed, I'd like to have your words about why instead of just leaving the bare merge tag. (merge tags have a GIGANTIC backlog.....) --Alvestrand (talk) 16:44, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sure thing!--Paul (talk) 19:47, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
How is this, squire?--Paul (talk) 20:04, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
BTW, I think this is quite important since the 2009 Nobel Prize in Physiology and Medicine was awarded for the study and discovery of telomeres and telomerase.--Paul (talk) 20:06, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Looks good - thanks! --Alvestrand (talk) 07:00, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WP:RFBOT

Your recent bot approvals request has been approved for tial. Please see the request page for details. . Good luck! Tim1357 (talk) 23:05, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

The Bio-star
I'm amazed no-one has awarded you this already, but it is most deserved for your contributions to
Wikipedia:WikiProject RNA / Rfam synergy. Rockpocket 16:51, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply
]
Awwww, shucks. I'm blushing. Thanks! ;-) --Paul (talk) 17:39, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:CDKN2A COSMIC histogram.png

Thanks for uploading File:CDKN2A COSMIC histogram.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 14:08, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

COSMIC cancer database

Hi. I've nominated COSMIC cancer database, an article you worked on, for consideration to appear on the Main Page as part of Wikipedia:Did you know. You can see the hook for the article here, where you can improve it if you see fit. Rockpocket 17:34, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, the COSMIC DYK will be on the front page on 10th September between 1 and 7pm. Well done. Rockpocket 12:23, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Super! Welldone Rockpocket. --Paul (talk) 20:06, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hairpin ribozyme

Hi, could you take a look at

T:TDYK#Hairpin_ribozyme? Thanks Smartse (talk) 10:05, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

DYK for Hairpin ribozyme

RlevseTalk • 12:39, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Great! Thanks. --Paul (talk) 19:51, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WTSI wiki-group

Thanks for your Welcome!

--Magdalena ZZ (talk) 12:25, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No problem!--Paul (talk) 12:31, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There is already an appropriate criticism section over at

WP:BLP. Several of the claims you've added, such as "this paper led to a firestorm of criticism on the internet", which is sourced to an article in Slate, which in turn is sourced to a blog post which you admit "was published online" does not meet the strict standards of science and biography articles. In this particular case, such criticism needs to appear in a peer-reviewed journal. Viriditas (talk) 14:21, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

I was not aware of the
Wikipedia:BLP#Avoid_self-published_sources policy. I don't necessarily agree with the policy but will abide. I'm sure the scientific literature will eventually catch up with the criticisms made of the GFAJ-1. You should add a reference to the advanced access version of the "in press" article. --Paul (talk) 19:11, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

BLP/N notice

Hello. This is a message to inform you about a thread that may interest you on the Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard. The topic of discussion is Felisa_Wolfe-Simon. Thank you. Viriditas (talk) 14:38, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Computational Biology

Hi,

Thanks for signing up to

discussion page. Alexbateman (talk) 09:15, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

File permission problem with File:Magnesium sensor RNA pdb-2qbz.png

Thanks for uploading File:Magnesium sensor RNA pdb-2qbz.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at

non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags
for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on

T/C) 22:13, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

File permission problem with File:Lys ribosw 1.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Lys ribosw 1.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at

non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags
for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on

T/C) 21:35, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

Hi Drilnoth. This image is covered by the email I sent earlier to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. I've updated the licensing and other information accordingly. --Paul (talk) 21:51, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:SAM-PDB-2gis.png

Thank you for uploading File:SAM-PDB-2gis.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the

image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 00:52, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

Xanthomonas sRNAs

Hi, I hope all is well in NZ. I orignally had the Xanthomonas campestris sRNAs in seperate paragraphs to keep the information about seperate pathovars separate. If you'd prefer it as one paragraph I can rewrite, but would prefer to make it clear that there have been studies on 2 different pathovars (Schmidtke et al studied X.campestris pv. vesicatoria, Jiang et al and Chen et al both studied pv. campestris). The article now implies both ground have studied the same pathovar. Do you have any particular preferences about how best to tweak this article? I probably won't do it until Monday. --RE73 (talk) 08:53, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ruth. Please do update that paragraph to better reflect both studies. I was hoping you would! It was a little repetitive the other way.--Paul (talk) 09:17, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Little Barrier Island giant weta-little barrier 2011.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Little Barrier Island giant weta-little barrier 2011.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (tc) 15:29, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your message. This may take slightly longer than a week to sort out. The Copyright Holder works in remote locations in New Zealand. I've sent him a message which when it arrives I'll forward to [email protected]. Navigating image copyrights is proving to be a dog.--115.188.129.132 (talk) 21:06, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Let me know on my talk page when he sends the message, and I will work the ticket, in order to expedite it. Also, if you have any other images from that person, you might want to get his permission for all of those at the same time. Sorry about the dog; I guess you could say we're "doggedly" committed to free content. Magog the Ogre (tc) 03:26, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Will do. I certainly appreciate the sentiment, shame the execution can be clunky. Thanks for your patience Magog! --Paul (talk) 03:54, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Paperpile

Hello Ppgardne,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Paperpile for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Trivialist (talk) 16:58, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Paperpile-browser-screenshot.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading

claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media
).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the

Stefan2 (talk) 10:45, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Orphaned non-free image File:PaperpileLogo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading

claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media
).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the

Stefan2 (talk) 10:45, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Possibly unfree File:Pacific gecko-little barrier 2011.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Pacific gecko-little barrier 2011.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Deadstar (talk) 12:15, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Pacific gecko-little barrier 2011.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Pacific gecko-little barrier 2011.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Animalparty-- (talk) 07:51, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. On February 24, 2015, you tagged

OTRS pending}}. If you have submitted an email to [email protected], could you please re-send it? I have personally confirmed that no relevant message containing the word "gecko" has been submitted in the last two months. Nor has any email containing the names "William Stovell" or "Zoe Stone" been submitted. If you forwarded the message, it has not been received and needs to be re-sent. If you have not forwarded it, please do so now. --B (talk) 03:32, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

File permission problem with File:Pacific gecko-little barrier 2011.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Pacific gecko-little barrier 2011.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Willy Weazley 03:49, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Mokohinau skink-little barrier 2011-4.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Mokohinau skink-little barrier 2011-4.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Willy Weazley 03:50, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Little Barrier Island giant weta-little barrier 2011-2.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Little Barrier Island giant weta-little barrier 2011-2.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Willy Weazley 03:50, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Mokohinau skink-little barrier 2011-3.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Mokohinau skink-little barrier 2011-3.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Willy Weazley 03:50, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Mokohinau skink-little barrier 2011-2.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Mokohinau skink-little barrier 2011-2.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Willy Weazley 03:50, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Mokohinau skink-little barrier 2011.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Mokohinau skink-little barrier 2011.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Willy Weazley 03:50, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Moko skink-little barrier 2011-2.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Moko skink-little barrier 2011-2.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Willy Weazley 03:50, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Pacific gecko-little barrier 2011.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Pacific gecko-little barrier 2011.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Willy Weazley 03:50, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Moko skink-little barrier 2011.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Moko skink-little barrier 2011.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Willy Weazley 03:52, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Shore skink-little barrier 2011-2.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Shore skink-little barrier 2011-2.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Willy Weazley 03:52, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Shore skink-little barrier 2011.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Shore skink-little barrier 2011.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Willy Weazley 03:52, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

ArbCom Elections 2016
: Voting now open!

Hello, Ppgardne. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections
is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

New Challenge for Oceania and Australia

Hi,

Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge which has currently produced over 2300 article improvements and creations. The Australia challenge would feed into the wider region one and potentially New Zealand could have a smaller challenge too. The main goal is content improvement, tackling stale old stubs and important content and improving sourcing/making more consistent but new articles are also welcome if sourced. I understand that this is a big goal for regular editors, especially being summertime where you are, but if you'd like to see large scale quality improvements happening for Oceania and Australia like The Africa Destubathon, which has produced over 1700 articles in 5 weeks, sign up on the page. The idea will be an ongoing national editathon/challenge for the region but fuelled by a series of contests to really get articles on every province and subject mass improved. The Africa contest scaled worldwide would naturally provide great benefits to Oceania countries, particularly Australia and attract new editors. I would like some support from existing editors here to get the Challenges off to a start with some articles to make doing a Destubathon worthwhile and potentially bring about hundreds of improvements in a few weeks through a contest! Cheers.♦ --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:12, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

Invitation to editathon at ISMB/ECCB 2017

ISCB Wikipedia Competition: call for participation

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Ppgardne. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

TsRNA listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect TsRNA. Since you had some involvement with the TsRNA redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. dqwyy (talk) from zhwiki 01:26, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ISCB Wikipedia Competition 2018: entries open!

8th ISCB Wikipedia Competition: entries open!

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Ppgardne. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

8th ISCB Wikipedia Competition: a reminder

8th ISCB Wikipedia Competition: entries closing soon!

8th ISCB Wikipedia competition: deadline extended!

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Request for applications for position of Wikipedian-at-Large, Aotearoa New Zealand

Kia ora! The Wikimedia Aotearoa New Zealand User Group invites you to read about the call for applications for a Wikipedian-at-Large for Aotearoa New Zealand in 2024. Group members are happy to explain the process and discuss ideas with interested editors.

Sent by Zippybonzo on behalf of MurielMary using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 06:37, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to an in-person meetup in Mohua / Golden Bay

Golden Bay Air are holding some seats for us until 21 November

Thinking about your summer break? Think about joining other Wikipedians and Wikimedians in Golden Bay / Mohua! Details are on the meetup page. There's heaps of interesting stuff to work on e.g. the oldest extant waka or New Zealand's oldest ongoing legal case. Or you may spend your time taking photos and then upload them.

Golden Bay is hard to get to and the airline flying into Tākaka uses small planes, so we are holding some seats from and to Wellington and we are offering attendees a $200 travel subsidy to help with costs.

Be in touch with Schwede66 if this event interests you and you'd like to discuss logistics. Schwede66 09:14, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply
]