User talk:Rhodydog

/Archive 1

Hello, Rhodydog. Thank you for your work on

, had the following comments:

Thank you for creating the article! Hopefully you will write more, have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 07:45, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks you for your note. I'd be happy to add more material. Rhodydog (talk) 21:15, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

]

CS1 error on

Draft:James A. Glazier

Hello, I'm

Draft:James A. Glazier

, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)
• A "missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

. Thanks, ]

CS1 error on

Draft:James A. Glazier

Hello, I'm

Draft:James A. Glazier

, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

. Thanks, ]

Hello, Rhodydog. It has been over six months since you last edited the

".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:25, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

]

that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

]

that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

]

Hello, Rhodydog. It has been over six months since you last edited the

".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:09, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That’s ok, I decided it wouldn’t get past review hence I didn’t update it. Rhodydog (talk) 17:42, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to

]

I am the copyright owner of the image I added to the page. I created it using Affinity Designer.

I'd like to put it into the public domain but that problem is probably more complicated to do. I'll read the page you suggest to figure out how to claim copyright the image can be restored. Rhodydog (talk) 01:26, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I read the instructions and did a release using the tool [generated using relgen] where I made the claim "am the creator and/or sole owner of the exclusive copyright of the media work" Is that sufficient? Rhodydog (talk) 01:38, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

? My message was about some prose I removed that was copied from https://vdocuments.site/cb-chapter3.html. I did not remove any images. — Diannaa (talk) 14:36, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ah yes that makes sense, that is actually my textbook and I own copyright to all the text since I self-publish. You wouldn't have known that. I can reword the text if you like. I assume I can just go back to the history to check what was removed and reedit. Rhodydog (talk) 21:27, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Here is a link to the CopyPatrol report. Click on the iThenticate link to view what was found by the detection service. — Diannaa (talk) 12:44, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have updated the text as follows:

Match 1:

"if reversibility is removed as well the equation reduces to the simple irreversible Michaelis-Menten rate law. The equation can also revert to the product inhibited but irreversible rate law by setting the Keq to infinity. "

has been replaced with:

"If the enzyme is irreversible the equation turns into the simple Michaelis-Menten equation that is irreversible. When letting the equilibrium constant tend to infinity, the equation can be seen to revert to the simpler case where the product inhibits the reverse step."

Match 2:

"For an enzyme with ${\displaystyle h}$ (using the author's original notation) binding sites, the general form of the reversible Hill equation is given by:"

has been changed to:

"Using the author's own notation, if an enzyme has ${\displaystyle h}$ sites that can bind ligand, the form, in the general case, can be shown to be:"

Match 3:

"If h=1 the equation reduces to the non-cooperative reversible Michaelis-Menten equation."

has been changed to:

"The non-cooperative reversible Michaelis-Menten equation can be seen to emerge when we set the Hill coefficient to one."

Rhodydog (talk) 23:20, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That looks ok from a copyright point of view. Thanks, — Diannaa (talk) 00:08, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of systems biology modeling software, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Maxima.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rhodydog! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Kj cheetham (talk) 18:55, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for spotting this, I probably was in auto mode and hit minor edit by mistake. Will

be more vigilant in future. Rhodydog (talk) 19:07, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rhodydog. Thank you for your work on

, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 16:48, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@North8000: I appreciate your support, I’m slowly getting the hang of what’s expected. Rhodydog (talk) 19:45, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I putter around in drafts sometimes.

looks good and I expect it will promoted in due course, but because it's Fancy Science I think it needs a lede paragraph in "explain like I'm five" language. I don't dare attempt it but I find it helps to just couch stuff in very broad terms. "Reversible Michaelis-Menten kinetics are metabolic models using differential equations to study the biochemistry of enzymes." Etc. I have no idea if the foregoing makes a whit of sense just try to use big subject-level words if that makes sense, so someone clicking on the Wikipedia "random" button and landing on the page has some idea what planet they landed on. Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia!!! jengod (talk) 01:28, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the comment, what you say sounds very reasonable. I’ll see what I can do. Rhodydog (talk) 02:29, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just copying what I put it the edit summary: You are obviously an excellent teacher somewhere in the real world! I tweaked it a tiny bit (just for wiki style "ledes" as I understand it -- see Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lead section) but I think this is valuable for both near-laypeople and advanced scholars. Of course revert or rework my changes see fit, and some other know-it-all will come along later and mess with it some other way LOL but I personally think we'd be lucky to have this article on Wikipedia. TY again. jengod (talk) 22:10, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good, thanks Rhodydog (talk) 22:27, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Rhodydog -- I took a look at this draft; is there a reason why you need to get an AfC review for it? It's very unlikely you will get anyone working there who can improve it at all. If you consider it finished, you could just move it to mainspace. Cheers, Espresso Addict (talk) 04:13, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the advice. I will do that. Rhodydog (talk) 04:30, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Linear biochemical pathway

Hello, Rhodydog,

Thank you for creating Linear biochemical pathway.

and note that:

This page is

too technical

for the uninitiated reader.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|FormalDude}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the

.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

––FormalDude (talk) 02:52, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I can fix that. Rhodydog (talk) 04:06, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Rhodydog. Thank you for your work on

page curation process

, had the following comments:

Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 07:32, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rhodydog. It has been over six months since you last edited the

".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 08:12, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]