User talk:Rkieferbaum

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Merger discussion for Anitta's anal tattoo

they|xe) 05:57, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Question from Jellypeeler (12:41, 19 February 2024)

Hello, I am trying to translate a page from Spanish but facing an error, do you know why this may be? link --Jellypeeler (talk) 12:41, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New Pages Patrol newsletter April 2024

Hello Rkieferbaum,

New Page Review queue January to March 2024

Backlog update: The October drive reduced the article backlog from 11,626 to 7,609 and the redirect backlog from 16,985 to 6,431! Congratulations to Schminnte, who led with over 2,300 points.

Following that, New Page Patrol organized another backlog drive for articles in January 2024. The January drive started with 13,650 articles and reduced the backlog to 7,430 articles. Congratulations to JTtheOG, who achieved first place with 1,340 points in this drive.

Looking at the graph, it seems like backlog drives are one of the only things keeping the backlog under control. Another backlog drive is being planned for May. Feel free to participate in the May backlog drive planning discussion.

It's worth noting that both queues are gradually increasing again and are nearing 14,034 articles and 22,540 redirects. We encourage you to keep contributing, even if it's just a single patrol per day. Your support is greatly appreciated!

2023 Awards

Onel5969 won the 2023 cup with 17,761 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 50/day. There was one Platinum Award (10,000+ reviews), 2 Gold Awards (5000+ reviews), 6 Silver (2000+), 8 Bronze (1000+), 30 Iron (360+) and 70 more for the 100+ barnstar. Hey man im josh led on redirect reviews by clearing 36,175 of them. For the full details, see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone for their efforts in reviewing!

WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers deployed the rewritten NewPagesFeed in October, and then gave the NewPagesFeed a slight visual facelift in November. This concludes most major work to Special:NewPagesFeed, and most major work by the WMF Moderator Tools team, who wrapped up their major work on PageTriage in October. The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers will continue small work on PageTriage as time permits.

Recruitment: A couple of the coordinators have been inviting editors to become reviewers, via mass-messages to their talk pages. If you know someone who you'd think would make a good reviewer, then a personal invitation to them would be great. Additionally, if there are Wikiprojects that you are active on, then you can add a post there asking participants to join NPP. Please be careful not to double invite folks that have already been invited.

Reviewing tip: Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages within their most familiar subjects can use the regularly updated NPP Browser tool.

Reminders:

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:27, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New page patrol May 2024 Backlog drive

New Page Patrol
|
May 2024 Articles Backlog Drive
  • On 1 May 2024, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Each review will earn 1 point.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:15, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question from LeonaLeeSykes (18:29, 22 April 2024)

Hello Rkieferbaum. I would like to add a coroner's report to a suicide on the deadly incidents section on the Burj Khalifa page. I have the document. Could I use this as a reference or should I use mention of it from a newspaper report. Thank you. --LeonaLeeSykes (talk) 18:29, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@LeonaLeeSykes: hello there! Citing the document itself, if you have access to it directly, would be problematic. But if it is publicly accessible or if it has been mentioned by an independent and reliable source, then, by all means, you should cite the information that was replicated there. Does that solve your problem? Cheers! Rkieferbaum (talk) 18:33, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much Rkieferbaum. I will try that. LeonaLeeSykes (talk) 16:24, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Would I be able to reference emails sent from a government body confirming that the information that my daughter died from the observation deck was received from the CID Dubai? LeonaLeeSykes (talk) 16:43, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]