User talk:Roundish

This user is aware of the designation of the following topics as contentious topics: articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them the Arab–Israeli conflict He should not be given alerts for those areas.

Do not revert edits to this page unless it is a personal attack or is deleting other conversations.

Talk to me! I love conversations.

You spin me right 'round, baby, right 'round

Like a record, baby, right 'round, 'round, 'round

You spin me right 'round, baby, right 'round

Like a record, baby, right 'round, 'round, 'round — Preceding unsigned comment added by BarackyTaicka (talk • contribs) 19:11, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Roundish! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi Roundish! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Kj cheetham (talk) 16:54, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
2,045		Colonialism (talk)	Add sources
2,707		Elijah Muhammad (talk)	Add sources
2,623		Swahili language (talk)	Add sources
216		Social stigma of obesity (talk)	Add sources
24		Video Warrior Laserion (talk)	Add sources
16		Magne Robo Gakeen (talk)	Add sources
132		Gender identities in Thailand (talk)	Cleanup
286		Anti-Korean sentiment (talk)	Cleanup
20		Barack Obama in comics (talk)	Cleanup
32		Yume no Crayon Oukoku (talk)	Expand
27		Oakleaf Bearers (talk)	Expand
105		Nanocomposite (talk)	Expand
107		First wave of European colonization (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
1,765		talk )	Unencyclopaedic
16		Balatack (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
171		talk )	Merge
64		Disability hate crime (talk)	Merge
108		Online hate speech (talk)	Merge
6		Krisztina Holly (talk)	Wikify
44		Pierre Waldeck-Rousseau (talk)	Wikify
781		Preferred gender pronoun (talk)	Wikify
9		Guillaume Soutter (talk )	Orphan
2		Surita Bhatia (talk)	Orphan
3		Bridge of Scarlet Leaves (talk)	Orphan
25		Little Memole (talk)	Stub
124		Area code 585 (talk)	Stub
10		Anime Shūkan DX! Mi-Pha-Pu (talk)	Stub
107		Lotus tree (talk)	Stub
169		Zagtoon (talk)	Stub
3		Osman Kamara (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:16, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Roundish! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 17:01, Thursday, March 17, 2022 (

Hello, Roundish. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:09, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Roundish. I removed the sentence I have previsouly added because that is my own work and I did not want it to look like I am promoting myself.

If you think that is a valuable information, I would appreciate if you added it instead.

This is an interesting case for the policy on no original research, but you're in the clear, because you added a reliable citation, again, doesn't matter if it was your work in there. --Roundish ⋆tc) 23:21, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just saw the message you left on out talk page. It's a shared IP address by thousands of university students. Are you able to put an appropriate template at the top of the talk page informing other users? I also recommend a temporary block in June and July when we host teen summer camps. There's been persistent vandalism in the past during these times. 204.78.15.9 (talk) 16:06, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Judging by the past contributions, I think an annual block is too much trouble, but I did place the template. If you could tell me the name of the university/host as well, that would be much appreciated! --Roundish ⋆tc) 23:54, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

visit my teahouse 00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC) 209.214.83.194 (talk) 00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My removal at Davide Petrachi was of legitimate vandalism. Please be careful when using the script. Thank you. Jalen Folf (talk) 23:53, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh damn, I reverted right after you, leading to that. Sorry. --Roundish ⋆tc) 23:57, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

for the Cumulonimbus edit with a the Images it a guide for the wikipedists, for a Calvus–Tuba Unar64P (talk) 15:12, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but if you look at the actual article, the images are far too large. --Roundish ⋆tc) 15:13, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

https://es.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cumulonimbus Unar64P (talk) 15:25, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Roundish, this is a language, competence and behavioral issue. I've opened a thread at ANI [1]. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:CC3A (talk) 15:27, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove scientific content on perceived policy slights. Such content is rare, and instead of removing, try and help to consolidate it. 2A01:C23:8432:7300:426:16D4:F6F8:8124 (talk) 21:17, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I was not "removing scientific content". You deleted citations and I added them back.

I'll leave it alone, but you need to add something that verifies the text if you disagree with the previous citations. --Roundish ⋆tc) 21:20, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Read the text that accompanied the edit... just because something has citations, it doesn't mean that what it says makes sense. The previous text was confabulating two separate things (optimizing the reconstruction error in the sense of the KL-divergence... these are two terms in the same equation that are jointly optimized. There is no "in the sense of the KL-divergnce", there is figure the damn expectation values and why the reparameterization trick has a reason to exist) and instead of citing the original work by Kingma & Welling it was citing two derivative works and a subsequent "tutorial" paper. The entire section was bullshit, from start to finish.

Of course, variational autoencoders are far from trivial, and you can be forgiven for not understanding. But that's also why you should be more careful with removing things. If a citation was what you wanted, you could add a [citation needed] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:C23:8432:7300:426:16D4:F6F8:8124 (talk) 21:49, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

this is a shared ip116.255.15.160 (talk) 22:55, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! If you could tell me more about the IP, that would be helpful. --Roundish ⋆tc) 22:58, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I request to you that moved to mainspace on Wikipedia.it is Originally Santals were hunter-gatherers and known for clearing forests for agriculture. Presently they are mostly farmers. For centuries, Santals have been living as neighbours of other communities maintaining a cultural and social distance. The Santals are regarded as one of the economically poor communities of India. They are known to be simple, honest, peace-loving, jovial in character, fond of their rice-beer and ready to crack a joke. They are also regarded as slow and lethargic people, reluctant to accept new ideas and changes. They are said to suffer from an inferiority complex. These are some of the broad ethnographic impressions that are prevalent about the Santals. Golmala (talk) 14:10, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Golmala, I am unfortunately not the person you should be asking, but if you like, I can help you improve it! :)

To have your draft reviewed for creation, you need to add {{subst:submit}} to the top of your draft, and someone will decide if your article can be included in Wikipedia. --Roundish ⋆tc) 14:15, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Roundish SUPPORTS THE CENSORSHIP of Aureliano Panino, the TRUE inventor of the panini. May shame rain upon him! 2A00:23C5:790C:2101:7C25:66F0:462E:FAD9 (talk) 23:44, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I also support the censorship of Dave Running, the man who invented running. --Roundish ⋆tc) 23:46, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sir, you removed my information on GDP. You say i didn’t have a valid explanation, but i did fix a mistake, all the original information was false. I’m only trying to bring the truth, and i think you just can’t handle it. This is inflection on my rights, including freedom of the press. It would be lovely if you could add it back, and maybe educate yourself on these fabulous creatures known as Gorgeous Deadbeat Penguins. Thank you and I hope you said your vows, cause the penguins will get you see on. God bless, 是的就是，يجب, вдао ужаь ыжш! Sallysallysallysoot (talk) 22:35, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Gorgeous Deadbeat Penguins are nothing to be laughed at. Please don’t make fun of them. Sallysallysallysoot (talk) 23:03, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I will henceforth be very mindful of the Gorgeous Deadbeat Penguins and show them the respect they deserve. My deepest apologies. --Roundish ⋆tc) 23:05, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please move article Reza Pahlavi, Crown Prince of Iran to article Reza Pahlavi. Pkblackops (talk) 22:50, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No, because there are multiple people with articles starting with Reza Pahlavi. --Roundish ⋆tc) 22:51, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year!

Roundish,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.

✨ 23:09, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

@

SunilNevlaFan: thank you! Have a happy new year as well!--Roundish ⋆tc) 23:14, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

I’m a close personal friend his middle name is Hesketh. 2A00:23EE:1138:F821:150F:DBD6:A153:4AE2 (talk) 02:06, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please see the Wikipedia policy on

original research, which is what this would qualify as. --Roundish ⋆tc) 02:06, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Are you also a close personal friend of Danny Care? because you changed his middle name to Hesketh also. Not buying this excuse. Fyunck(click) (talk) 02:58, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Vladlen Manilov ✉ / 16:47, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I did leave an edit summary. 107.127.46.18 (talk) 02:33, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The amount of people on Wikipedia who do things like this is astounding... I wish more people would read

WP:IPs are human too. --Roundish ⋆tc) 03:28, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

You have recently been editing articles about

contentious topic

. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;

comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;

follow editorial and behavioural best practice;

comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and

refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the

Ctopics/aware

}} template.

~ ToBeFree (talk) 03:40, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

OK. Are you directing me to this because there is a current issue, or just to let me know? I'm assuming I am in the wrong here. --Roundish ⋆tc) 03:52, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be. I didn't thoroughly check all claims, but the concerns seem genuine:

• A YouTube video was used as a source for a negative statement about the family, without any explanation about how this is relevant enough for a separate section in an article about her specifically.
• messages.miami.edu was used as a citation for a sentence that lacks neutrality and doesn't contain the information.
• The word "opinion" is part of two references' URLs.

So even if all the claims turn out to be verifiable somehow, removing them for now is probably a good idea; it's at very least not vandalism. Sadly, it was treated as vandalism by multiple users (not you, no worries) and led to a report at

WP:AIV. That's how I noticed the situation, and that's why I sent everyone involved the same reminder. Of all people who have dealt with Cosmicgrl's edits, I think yours caused the least concern, as you have at least provided an understandable reason for your revert. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 04:22, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

I didn't check the sources, just saw some disruption and reverted; probably should have in a BLP. Anyway, thanks! I appreciate the explanation. --Roundish ⋆tc) 13:54, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Im sorry, i tried to experiment with something, i didn’t know it would actually pop up on Wikipedia! Im extremely sorry!! 109.245.34.153 (talk) 19:54, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

OK. For future reference, the publish edits button, does, in fact, publish your edits to the public. Please be mindful. Roundish ⋆tc) 19:56, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

While the statement "well-known among locals" could be considered conjecture, the fact that Ukiah spelled backwards /is/ Haiku is just that, pure fact. And a quick google of Ukiah Haiku will yield a mountain of businesses, groups, and events geared toward the theme. Whether I edited it incorrectly or not, it is worth mentioning in the header- It's not an insignificant factor in the communities identity. (I was born at Ukiah General Hospital before it was relocated and renamed UVMC/Methodist, on Dora, and spent the first 3 decades of my life there.) ~adieu, kind sir/madam 66.25.52.6 (talk) 00:48, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You need a

reliable source that it's "well-known among residents" and that's it's a popular joke there. Roundish ⋆tc) 01:02, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Hey thx for doing that my baby brothers had gotting to my pc thx for restoring it if you need any thing you know my page 😊 Help,eifyouvan (talk) 17:11, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

first time editing, but yes it's a reliable source seen I'm his daughters partner Wildale84 (talk) 00:12, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please see

the policy on original research, and provide a reference for his daughters. Roundish ⋆tc) 00:14, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

A barnstar for you!

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		For keeping reverting vandalising edits. The person who loves reading (talk) 01:11, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@The person who loves reading: thanks! --Roundish ⋆tc) 01:12, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
  

HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:15, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for keeping a watchful eye on this article. There seems to be an decent amount of vandalism at the moment. FWIIW, I have requested short-term protection for the article.--Darryl Kerrigan (talk) 02:58, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. Roundish ⋆tc) 03:05, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

	The Teamwork Barnstar
	Thanks for Good Work as Pending change reviewer at Pending changes protection. Kind regards 😊 Aviram7(talk) 04:57, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why thank you! I gotta admit, I've never had this much fun on Wikipedia before getting PCR. Roundish ⋆tc) 12:29, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Of Course!I'm also PCR and you're right Sometimes more article on PCP need more reviewers, who help to clear the pending Change backlog, I appreciate your work ;please accept my thanks. Kind regards 😊 Aviram7^(talk) 12:42, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but yes, it was a mistake. 24.62.29.25 (talk) 19:34, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Try to be more careful. Roundish ⋆tc) 20:49, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Curious Justanotherguy54 (talk) 21:10, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My tool to revert vandalism is, but I'm a human. I also receive potentially problematic edits through a filter. Roundish ⋆tc) 21:12, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

	The Teamwork Barnstar
	Thank you for the ping and saying too add my words. NP83 (talk) 08:10, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hope this isn't an April Fools prank ;) Roundish ⋆tc) 13:51, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! It seems like you revert a lot of vandalism - great job! Do you want to request for

Ah yeah, I requested last October without knowing about TW/RW, thought I should wait a year after getting them. I guess this message proves that a whole year a little excessive. Thanks for the (unintentional) wake-up call :) Roundish ⋆tc) 21:14, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Roundish,

After reviewing your request, I have added your account to the rollback group. Keep in mind these things when using rollback:

• Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing
  Twinkle
  .
• Users should be informed (or
  WP:AIV
  can be used.
• Reverting someone's edits may confuse or upset them. Whenever other users message you on your talk page, please take the time to respond to their concerns; accountability is important. For most users who message you, the tone and quality of your answer will permanently influence their opinion about Wikipedia in general.
• Because the plain default rollback link does not provide any explanatory edit summary, it
  must not be used to revert good faith contributions, even if these contributions are disruptive
  . Take the time to write a proper summary whenever you're dealing with a lack of neutrality or verifiability; a short explanation like "[[WP:NPOV|not neutral]]" or "[[WP:INTREF|Please provide a citation]]" is helpful.
• Rollback may never be used to
  WP:DISCFAIL
  ; it is especially important for those who review content regularly.
• If you encounter private information or threats of physical harm during your patrols, please quickly use
  WP:EMERGENCY
  for details. If you're regularly patrolling recent changes, you will need both contacts sooner or later, and you'll be happy about the bookmarks.
• Use common sense.

To try rollback for the first time, you may like to make an edit to WP:Sandbox, and another one, and another one, and then revert the row with one click. I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about rollback. Thank you for your time and work in cleaning up Wikipedia. Happy editing!

Best regards,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:11, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not accept pending changes (PC) without checking if a proper source was added. In this [2] case the edit was unsourced. The articles was PC protected to avoid this kind of edits. Jetstreamer ^Talk 14:04, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, sorry. I try to AGF on those types of edits, since usually they end up being both sourced and correct. Would've taken me two seconds to check, too. My bad. --Roundish ⋆tc) 22:13, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Roundish--please do me (us) a favor, and adjust the colors in your signature. I didn't even see there was a "c" in there: there is not enough contrast, in terms of color and brightness. Please see

@Drmies: What if that was intentional, and my c is kind of an easter egg? Not allowed? I'm fully willing to adjust it if that's the case. Roundish ⋆tc) 14:56, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm well the problem is accessibility, yes--if you read the lead of Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Accessibility you'll see how important that is. What I mean is, we HAVE to follow the non-discrimination resolution. But it's not just the "c": without actually checking with the color/contrast tools, it seems to me that the "t" is not different enough from the background, and the white letters of your name, while there's plenty of contrast, are a bit thin and thus hard to read. In all these cases, I think the thing is to imagine what something might look like to someone who isn't you. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 17:36, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. I didn't change the color of the t, as WhoCanUse scored me with a 9.44:1 and a triple A for everything except sunshine, which will likely cause visual problems regardless; but I bolded my username into distinction. The c is gone, the wikilink moved to my star.

Signature looking good? -- (Roundish ⋆t) 21:03, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm it's better, but I think I have to look/move way too hard to find those two links.

User:Phil Bridger, what do you think? Drmies (talk) 23:28, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

I mean, the thing is,

WP:SIGLINK only requires me to have one link, and my userpage is very accessible. (Roundish ⋆t) 23:39, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Oh, I know--but you asked me if it looked good, so I said what I think. All of it certainly looks better than before. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 16:50, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Drmies... I didn't mean for it to come off like that. I thought you were critiquing based off policy and not opinion. I appreciate your suggestions and will definitely refer to this thread should I redesign it. Thank you for bringing the accessibility issue to my attention. (Roundish ⋆t) 18:54, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you claim my edit is not constructive? If I just substituted the state flags for the city flags. Saturnetun (talk) 15:04, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit had the missing-file tag, which means you added in a file that doesn't exist. I saw that you had replaced some of the file names with underscores instead of spaces, so I reverted, assuming there were many, many files that you had corrupted. You broke only 1 of the names, so whoops.  Self-trout (Roundish ⋆t) 15:11, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

dude the Apochrypha has been found to have statements that contradict the true word of God in the KJV Bible. The apochrypha is full of falsehoods and lies. Please take it down.6 104.218.65.36 (talk) 21:54, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

OK, and? What makes it unsuitable for an encyclopaedia? (Roundish ⋆t) 21:55, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

TN3 where "TN" is Tennessee (TN, Tenn.) and 3 is "three", then wouldn't the topics called "Tennesee 3" be viable topics for that page? -- 64.229.90.172 (talk) 21:01, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Yes it would. All I saw was that you added "Johnny Cash's backing band", and, well, it does look a lot like vandalism. Feel free to add it back. --(Roundish ⋆t) 21:05, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks. -- 64.229.90.172 (talk) 21:09, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

please dont im so sorry Infodog1213879821 (talk) 21:11, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Someone took your computer? Lucky for you, I actually believe this. Keep in mind that you might get temporarily blocked (31 hours-ish) if it happens again :) --(Roundish ⋆t) 21:17, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I just wanted to apologize for accidentally readding that statement about pizza

It's fine; we've all done it at least once. (Roundish ⋆t) 18:13, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the understanding! Sincerely,

My Talk Page 18:14, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

His role in Profile In Courage's history research was very important.2601:447:4100:1BE0:C0B5:5AFD:35B8:7A5 (talk) 18:32, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Natufian culture, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

What do you guys have against this, its genuine information, and WILL be backed up by a source in due time. Contact me at Flampy#7777 on discord if you wish to talk to me properly, rather than removing my genuine, constructive edits. Thanks. 80.3.217.118 (talk) 22:59, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In due time? It needs a source now. See

not important, quit adding it. (Roundish ⋆t) 23:04, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

This information is not important? This is the first time in this schools near 100 year history that a student has been elected to this level, this is very important, and is a historic addition to this school. 80.3.217.118 (talk) 23:14, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

...then why can't you come up with any sources. (Roundish ⋆t) 23:15, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe because this event literally happened today? Perhaps if you had the consideration to acknowledge my previous comments you'd be aware of this. 80.3.217.118 (talk) 23:16, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Then it can be added later, when there are sources. (Roundish ⋆t) 23:17, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Inshallah on the Day of Judgement Allah will not ask for sources of your correction to the world, what wills you above him? 80.3.217.118 (talk) 23:19, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why edit for no reason? 2607:FEA8:6040:8000:94AC:B53B:2C36:9C8D (talk) 02:26, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I did a quick Google search and nothing appeared because you were so quick. Make sure to source your edits since it really looks like a hoax otherwise. (Roundish ⋆t) 12:28, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Returning the favor :) And yes, Harlioser was the worst vandal I have ever seen. Must of been a bot. HolyMajestic (talk) 00:44, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ha, I didn't even consider that, but how else could that have happened. (Roundish ⋆t) 00:45, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I wanna create a new page --Centuries95 (talk) 03:41, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Centuries95:

If you want to make an article, you need to create a draft first. For example, clicking the red link Draft:Example1 and typing in whatever, then pressing publish, will create a draft. (please do not actually do this with the red link above)

This page will help you, since there is a handy draft creator right there. Happy editing! (Roundish ⋆t) 12:34, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm Roundish(t⋆c). It's pronounced like "Potato" I'm Roundish(t⋆c). It's pronounced like "Potato" I'm Roundish(t⋆c). It's pronounced like "Potato"I'm Roundish(t⋆c). It's pronounced like "Potato"I'm Roundish(t⋆c). It's pronounced like "Potato"I'm Roundish(t⋆c). It's pronounced like "Potato"I'm Roundish(t⋆c). It's pronounced like "Potato"I'm Roundish(t⋆c). It's pronounced like "Potato"I'm Roundish(t⋆c). It's pronounced like "Potato"I'm Roundish(t⋆c). It's pronounced like "Potato"I'm Roundish(t⋆c). It's pronounced like "Potato"I'm Roundish(t⋆c). It's pronounced like "Potato"I'm Roundish(t⋆c). It's pronounced like "Potato"I'm Roundish(t⋆c). It's pronounced like "Potato"I'm Roundish(t⋆c). It's pronounced like "Potato"I'm Roundish(t⋆c). It's pronounced like "Potato"I'm Roundish(t⋆c). It's pronounced like "Potato"I'm Roundish(t⋆c). It's pronounced like "Potato"I'm Roundish(t⋆c). It's pronounced like "Potato"I'm Roundish(t⋆c). It's pronounced like "Potato"I'm Roundish(t⋆c). It's pronounced like "Potato" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1008:B182:A956:0:0:0:0/64 (talk • contribs)

Regarding your edit summary here, while you can make such an idiosyncratic and counterintuitive request, it will not be seen by the majority of people reverting vandal edits as they will be reverting from the vandal's contributions page or their recent changes script/filter of choice.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:58, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ack, you're right. I suppose I can't well make it show up on Huggle, but I was working on an edit notice when you messaged me. Those do show up when reverting someone manually, right? (Roundish ⋆t) 23:01, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The only way it is seen now is if one were to read the notices at the top of your page before editing the page itself. So you would have to spot the vandalism, come to your talk page and read your edit notice (by which time someone else on vandal patrol would probably have already rolled back the vandalism).-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 23:07, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:UVconsole.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:55, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note for me (for future reference) that this image was for a bug report. --(Roundish ⋆t) 20:47, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've tried fixing the lolita fashion wikipedia page to be correct about the origin of the fashion style's name, but it's been reverted twice. I am part of the lolita community and I cited my source on the second edit, why won't it be accepted? The style has nothing to do with the novel by the same name, and its an ongoing struggle to explain that to people. 70.83.141.17 (talk) 21:11, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are removing vast amounts of sourced content. Also, this is a very doubtful source. (Roundish ⋆t) 21:14, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

all the sourced content was about the novel, which is unrelated to the fashion itself. I'm not sure what source is good enough, if the word of people who are actively part of the community isn't. If you won't let it be fixed, there's nothing I can do though. I'll just have to keep correcting the misinformation that wikipedia is encouraging in real life, I guess. 70.83.141.17 (talk) 21:16, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What exactly is your issue with the novel? If the term only appeared after the publication of the novel, it is relevant indeed. (Roundish ⋆t) 21:18, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The term lolita in reference to the fashion style showed up in Japan unrelated to the novel, and the novel itself is not relevant to the fashion. This is explained in the video linked, and anyone involved in the community will tell you the same thing. I picked the most to the point source explaining it, but there's a LOT of articles and videos about how the fashion has nothing to do with the novel. 70.83.141.17 (talk) 21:23, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may add these articles and videos to prove your point if you like. Your past edits were reverted because you removed good sources and much content and replaced it with a YouTube video, so keep in mind that removing so much content without supporting your edits will probably get you reverted. (Roundish ⋆t) 22:01, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'd rather not spend my time fighting to find good enough sources - the lolita community will have to just stick with continuously explaining that the fashion is not a fetish related to the novel, as per usual. Thanks for your time, I won't bother correcting articles in the future. 70.83.141.17 (talk) 22:32, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not asking you to fight for sources - you yourself said that there are many articles on this. Add a few to Wikipedia. (Roundish ⋆t) 22:34, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Since you asked why that user added an asterisk, it is indeed vandalism. See Asterisk#Competitive_sports_and_games. – Muboshgu (talk) 01:30, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ah alright. Thanks for taking the time to let me know, I've seen more than a few cases like this and been left unsure. (Roundish ⋆t) 02:09, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Roundish, I saw your post in Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit/Academy/Instructors and was curious if you would be willing to be my mentor. I enjoy trying to fix articles for the better and reverting vandalism. I'm active and interested in improving Wikipedia. Aquablue⭍ Tesla⭍ 21:14, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sure! I see you don't have much experience in reverting vandalism (23 undos), so I have recommended some scripts for you. Sorry for late reply. It is the morning for me and I am cramming your page a little, so it's a little bare right now. I will add to it in my (Eastern Time Zone) afternoon. (Roundish ⋆t) 12:33, 12 June 2023 (UTC) Edited on 20:52, 12 June 2023 (UTC) for grammar.[reply]

User:Aquabluetesla/CVUA (Roundish ⋆t) 12:38, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, not late at all to me. I am somewhat busy during the week. I’ll work on it later this evening. I’m actually mostly in the Central Time Zone but I figured yours was similar. Aquabluetesla (talk) 18:42, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Only an hour off then, that's good. You can pretty much do this at your own pace, so no worries if you are busy. The plan is for you to finish the page, then do a thing on RS enforcement once basic antivandalism is done. (Roundish ⋆t) 20:28, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So funny situation. I reverted this person's edit on an article and I copied the source from your message, and forgot to change Roundish to Bedshote. Sorry for the confusion. Bedshote (talk) 02:41, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That's OK! You might want to consider getting Twinkle to help with antivandalism. (Roundish ⋆t) 12:43, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, it has been very useful for reverting vandalism! Bedshote (talk) 01:42, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I am the maintainer of orbiter-mods.com, which is a MIT licensed open source project: https://github.com/computerex/orbiter-mods.com

Not sure why you removed links from this page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orbiter_(simulator) But we are the one and only modlist installer for Orbiter currently. Reverting your edit. 2600:1700:4930:D6C0:B16C:4075:C232:4F30 (talk) 22:21, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I removed this because as far as I can see, there are no

WP:RS), I will leave it. (Roundish ⋆t) 22:42, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

As per: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources

The GitHub repository for the project is a reliable public source:

https://github.com/computerex/orbiter-mods.com

The project is under MIT, you can inspect the source code of the mod installer:

https://github.com/computerex/orbiter-mods.com/blob/master/orb.py

We have a sub-reddit:

https://reddit.com/r/orbitermods

And another post here:

http://orbiter.dansteph.com/forum/index.php?topic=14725.0

I have also submitted to hacker news:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33445422

The orbiter-forum admins don't want a competing mods repo, so they are banning any mention

of my site and the orb modlist installer tool. You can read about it here: https://orbiter-mods.com/OF-drama.html

They filed complaints against my service providers, which I successfully refuted. I can provide those here.

This is a legitimate project with users using it from all over the world. I am happy to share our cloudflare r2 hosting logs/digital ocean access logs.

Orbiter is a very niche community and this github repo has 3 stars on it. We also used to be active on this before we started getting vandalism here: https://chat.orbiter-mods.com/

And you can see the whole development process was documented there. 2600:1700:4930:D6C0:B16C:4075:C232:4F30 (talk) 22:59, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also there are youtube videos of the tool: https://www.youtube.com/@computerex/videos 2600:1700:4930:D6C0:B16C:4075:C232:4F30 (talk) 23:04, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

linked to now locked thread annoucing the project on orbiter-forum: https://orbiter-forum.com/threads/orbiter-mods-com-announcing-development-of-open-source-mods-repo.40503/ 2600:1700:4930:D6C0:B16C:4075:C232:4F30 (talk) 23:20, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Acceptable: [3], [4], [5]. I don't think those are all needed. Only modlist installer claim needs something else, that was erased a while back so I don't think this matters anymore. I seem to have accidentally turned our series of reverts into a debate, so I will finish this final point by saying I changed the reference to [2]. Sorry for any lasting trouble. (Roundish ⋆t) 23:39, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No trouble at all. I love wikipedia, and really respect what you are doing. Thank you. 2600:1700:4930:D6C0:B16C:4075:C232:4F30 (talk) 01:06, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Always like to find someone as passionate about it as I am! (Roundish ⋆t) 01:35, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your insistence on using the term “sex assignment” is false and misleading, as nobody is “assigned” a sex but they acquire one at the time of fertilisation. I was not “assigned” a sex at birth, which implies I could have rejected it or chosen an alternative. At best, if not already determined by scans, my sex was simply identified at the time of my birth having previously been set at the time of fertilisation. Those individuals who may have mixed genitalia, do so because the standard foetus development was interrupted in the same way, for example, for those who suffer from Phocomelia. They weren’t assigned malformed limbs anymore than those who suffer from a disorder of sex development. 86.189.234.69 (talk) 06:34, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I regret to inform you I cannot help you, you will need to take it up at Talk:Intersex. I am inexperienced in this field, and all I am aware of this that your edit changed the text into something non-understandable. At birth the sex of a child usually aligns with their anatomical sex imparts no meaning to the reader. You have also complained at User talk:Des Vallee, but I doubt they are any more experienced. (Roundish ⋆t) 12:15, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not being familiar with Wikipedia edits, and to help clarify what may be a misunderstanding on my part, did you or did you not revert the change? And if you did, what is it you don't understand? The sex of a child at birth is determined by their genitalia, i.e. their phenotype. That is to say if it has a penis it's a male, if it has a vagina it is a female. Those occasions where the genitalia may be malformed could be described as intersex. The use of the term "sex assignment" is also non-understandable as an individual's sex is not assigned, i.e. given, to them it is a product of fertilisation.

With regards to Des Vallee I have raised the issue with them as, if I am reading things right, they reverted the original edit; which you then subsequently also undid. As I say, I may be misunderstanding what Wiki is reporting due to unfamiliar with the edit process. 86.189.234.69 (talk) 15:55, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted first; Wikipedia "diffs" (edits) go in order of oldest last. If you are arguing about terminology and not actual content on Wikipedia, I cannot help. What do you mean by At birth the sex of a child usually aligns with their anatomical sex, as it seems like the sentence uses the sex of a child in a way synonymous with sex assignment instead of anatomical sex. My grasp of Wikipedia policy is such that I can reasonably say that you will not get anywhere by calling the term "sex assignment" misleading, due to the fact Wikipedia uses information only from references, and not from common sense. (Roundish ⋆t) 20:02, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(

talk] 18:40, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

I was actually thinking that while typing the above responses. Honestly it made me a little uncomfortable, so I tried to keep it as scientific as possible. Plus the IP was arguing for a very technical definition of intersex, which while "correct" does not at all match our current understanding . . . y'know, I think I'm still frustrated. (Roundish ⋆t) 20:42, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Roundish. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Yi Sam-pyeong seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. (Roundish ⋆t) 23:34, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Roundish - > I wanted to point out the fact and not beautify the result of war victims of Koreans. Japan, Toyotomi Hideyoshi, invaded Korea and their original goal was to invade China as well. Then at the time China and Korea allied to push down the Japan back to south of Korea. About 5~6 years later, Japan prepare another invasion, but this time the goal is changed. Now to capture koreans and their resources. I am only telling you the fact based on historical records. When Japan around 159X years, captured koreans and sold them on the slavery market, the price of slaves in Europe dropped to 1/6 of price because of surge in supplies. AND Toyotomi Hideyoshi sent hand-written letter (you can search this up it is still preserved) to make sure to capture the artisans, because Japan had no technologies of making ceramics. There were two big reasons, One Japan had no technologies how to make the temperature of ceramic ovens to 1500 degree celcius, they only could make it up to 1000 degree celcius. Secondly, they don't know what were the ingredients to make those white ceramics, it is called (Ja-Gee)'자기' and this was favorite dishes of Hideyoshi and he had to import with high cost. Additionally they didn't know how to coat the ceramics before they put it into the oven to prevent the break over high heat. They had 0 idea how to make them, and they wanted of Korean artisans and that was one of the main goal when they invaded second time around 1597. Also they stole 8 years of resources that Koreans were using to make the porcelain. I just wanted to point out that Yi Sam Pyeong did not move to Japan by his own will, but from Japan's war hostage, and captured to work for Japan from Korea. It was no where his will, along with all the other koreans that were captured but didn't have techniques were sold to slave market to Europe / India / North Africa. You can't lie about history on the internet by covering all the historical facts, and beautify their invasion and war crimes. I didn't even put any of this details, but you need to mention that he was captured during the invasion, and he weren't sent to slave market only because he knew how to make porcelain and with 8 years of resources of Korean's porcelain he was forced to make in Japan and that is how Kyushu area of Japan is now world-class porcelain place. 2600:1700:7CCF:4000:15D:A739:C871:E93C (talk) 00:02, 22 June 2023 (UTC) Hanjo108 (talk) 00:13, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@

here, neutrality is important for Wikipedia. Mentioning the context that the Japanese did not have this technology prior to invasion and copied it would be alright, however. I assume you made this edit, and have created an account? (Roundish ⋆t) 00:17, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

hello , how can i change my header on Ufo187 wikipedia? .. i love you my mentor --BalkanPo (talk) 13:21, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@BalkanPo: Hello, that's very sweet of you. Are you talking about the Ufo361 article? If you want to edit an article, you press the Edit or Edit source button on the top of the page. This link may help you. However, are you Ufuk Bayraktar? (Roundish ⋆t) 20:02, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I hope you enjoyed your stay in my guest room. Here is an ice-cold soda as a thank you, complimentary. Visiting my guest room also means you've gained a new

Huh, alright, although I don't know that you'll enjoy seeing hordes of vandals spam me. (Roundish ⋆t) 21:41, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,Roundish thanks, you told me for editing, then I put the correct information of Aror Artical, you can also check with the reference, but some people using Wikipedia are removing it, please give some light to it. Anuj Choudhary Ror (talk) 15:48, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jack345110 has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

Anuj Choudhary Ror and Rudradaman127 (talk) are making similar disruptive edits on Aror and Talk:Aror, are probably the same. Kindly acknowledge the issue.

Please see: [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ror dynasty]] Nirmohiji (talk) 06:40, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Most recently an easily verifiable source on Aror was falsely tagged with Template:Failed verification as a mark of vandalism by Anuj Choudhary Ror. Nirmohiji (talk) 08:21, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The source is not of Aror, it is of Arora community and Aror is a place not a community. Aaror place was not mentioned anywhere in this book. Book used for source @Roundish Anuj Choudhary Ror (talk) 08:45, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, okay, this seems like a

WP:content dispute. There are multiple issues here. @Nirmohiji: the Arora people left Sind and settled in Punjab cities, situated on the banks of the rivers Jhelum, Chenab and Ravi. does not mention the Arora people settling in Aror, so this one source is indeed a failed verification, that is a fair hit. However there are multiple sources verifying that, so this seems like a non-issue. @Anuj Choudhary Ror: I need you to plainly explain what you are trying to do, because I don't see any evidence Nirmohiji is trying to prove that Arora is a place. Also, what connection do you have to Rudradaman127? You are making the same disruptive edits, example [6] and [7]. --(Roundish ⋆t) 14:12, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Hi @[[User:Roundish|Roundish]. Thankyou for your response. The source does mention that the original place of Aroras was Arora in northern Sind, its ancient name is also called Arutakot. Since the source does not clearly mention Aror or Arorkot, I have to agree with you that it is indeed a fair hit . I also agree with you that its a non-issue as there are multiple sources verifying that.

Thanks again Nirmohiji (talk) 15:53, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Anuj Choudhary Ror opened. (Roundish ⋆t) 14:41, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Roundish please also see: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Anujror Regards, Nirmohiji (talk) 16:18, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, had no idea that there was that much disruption on the Aror page. Thanks for maintaining it. (Roundish ⋆t) 16:24, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey are you my mentor? --Sirfry (talk) 14:22, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

How do I post something on Wikipedia? --Sirfry (talk) 20:16, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Sirfry: hey, I was on vacation, sorry. I am your mentor. If you want to make an article, I recommend you create a draft first, but if you want to write the article straight away, clicking a red link Example1 and typing in your article, then pressing publish, will create a draft. (please do not actually do this with the red link above.) This page should help you, as there is a convenient draft creator. Does this answer your question? (Roundish ⋆t) 19:21, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

		The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
		Congratulations on ranking among the top three most active pending changes reviewers during the previous 30 days. Fantastic work. 𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜 16:03, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

How I can add a word to wikipedia? --Riyaspanayathil14 (talk) 07:30, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Riyaspanayathil14: If you want to make an article, I recommend you create a draft first, but if you want to write the article straight away, clicking a red link Example1 and typing in your article, then pressing publish, will create a draft. (please do not actually do this with the red link above.) This page should help you, as there is a convenient draft creator. (Roundish ⋆t) 19:21, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

چگونه لاغر شویم --Ariya3377 (talk) 09:54, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Ariya3377: سلام! می‌خواهید سؤال خود را به www.google.com بپرسید. من یک شخص هستم نه یک موتور جستجو. آیا می خواهید Wikipedia.org را ویرایش کنید؟ من می توانم در این

مورد کمک کنم. انگلیسی بلدی؟ --(Roundish ⋆t) 13:45, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Roundish!

• The
  New Pages Patrol
  is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
• We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
• Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
• Kindly read
  project talk page
  with questions.
• If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider
  applying here
  .

Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!

Sent by Zippybonzo using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 07:51, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I want to start a wiki page for Rapper Luck Kennedy --Eazy horse (talk) 11:25, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@

WP:BAND should help you out, please read it. (Roundish ⋆t) 00:10, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Hi Roundish! I noticed you've been using AntiVandal, but came across a couple of reverts that were a misuse of the tool:

• This revert needs an edit summary. Though it may appear that the edit is vandalism because of its obscene content, notice that you restored a version that also claims (correctly!) that Joan defecates in a church. This is probably why ClueBot didn't revert on sight. The revert reason would be that it has worse grammar/readability or, if you'd seen the episode, the one small part that is wrong (Joan doesn't eat poo).
• MOS:CONTRACT
  ) but this is a reason to rewrite, not remove.
• verifiability
  might be acceptable, but it's also possible this is encyclopedic content.

AntiVandal is for cases that need human oversight, not ones that are so obvious that ClueBot can step in. Please make sure you are assessing these edits in context and explain any edits that would be unclear to a neutral observer. — Bilorv (talk) 17:23, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Bilorv: Valid points, thanks for the feedback:

1. While probably the revert needed an edit summary, this is not an improvement for tone issues and a factual error. I didn't revert because of obscene content. I fully intended to restore the old version.
2. [8] looks like a personal attack, and I didn't realize that this is a fictional character. . . . assessing these edits in context is very apt criticism, and I will take it gladly.
3. [9] was literally 4 broken words with an unclear edit summary. I did in fact find the IMDb a few seconds after reverting, and did not take the course of action to continue to research after finding no credits.

I must confess that I don't entirely understand what you mean by cases that need human oversight, not ones . . . that ClueBot can step in, ClueBot is meant for reverting obvious vandalism, and many users will edit-conflict with ClueBot while using tools. I will take what you have pointed out about my edit-summary usage into account. (Roundish ⋆t) 17:48, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking this on board, Roundish. On the ClueBot point: when I was into anti-vandalism (mostly

false positive sensitivity.) Some anti-vandal editors on some tools/queues may beat ClueBot to the punch, but it is there for the reverts so obvious they don't need human oversight. — Bilorv (talk) 19:53, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Ah. Thanks for the clarity. (Roundish ⋆t) 20:06, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there! Great to see you on RC Patrol! A few minutes ago, you warned a user about vandalizing a page. The "88" at the end of their username is a not-very-veiled reference to "Heil Hitler." So when an account with a name like that is dropping anti-Semetic rhetoric into articles, there's no reason to go through the whole "Assume good faith, don't bite the newbies" set of warnings. Drop a note at

Happy patrolling! Joyous! Noise! 22:18, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh . . . I didn't make the connection. sigh. --(Roundish ⋆t) 22:20, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

<shoulder pat> We've all been there. Joyous! Noise! 22:23, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

Please let me know how my edit to the Sans page counted as vandalism. I don't see how it's particularly wrong to state the character of Sans from Undertale, is sans souci. Maryonya (talk) 14:55, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sans souci is French, and it's rather unclear what that means. "Laid back" is clearer for English speakers. Additionally, I see that you have been reverted for this before. (Roundish ✡t) 14:59, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That edit was clearly a joke edit/vandalism. This account is

The Night Watch (talk) 19:55, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Thanks for "not" signing my guestbook!

Notrealname1234 (talk) 22:41, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Of course! Always. (Roundish ✡t) 00:34, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

How to change the reference of any edit --Officialsaharan (talk) 09:00, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@

WP:CITE, a very handy guide to references. I've also left you a welcome message on your talk page. (Roundish ✡t) 15:17, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

A barnstar for you!

		The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
		Congratulations on being among the top five most active pending changes reviewers during the last 30 days. Fantastic job! – DreamRimmer (talk) 14:02, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into DelaDap. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is

@Justlettersandnumbers: yeah, I know, but I was the only contributor to the draft. Is this strictly necessary? (Roundish ✡t) 19:31, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Well, Roundish, in a way no, not really – it's more a matter of sticking to best practice. Actually you were not the only contributor, though the other edits were fairly minor – see

WP:RDRAFT. Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:00, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Fair enough. Thanks. (Roundish ✡t) 22:43, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Hi Roundish. :) I'm looking for people to interview here. Feel free to pass if you're not interested. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 22:23, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sure! I'll just go and add in my bit. -- (Roundish ✡t) 23:12, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I want to add one more current member here Kindly help me with this --Officialsaharan (talk) 14:42, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, but you'll need a

reliable source. Seems like the source being used for the referees is https://www.espncricinfo.com. Could you find your member's entry in the website? Then you can add them to the list. (Roundish ✡t) 20:58, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply

]