User talk:ServerCSS

Hi ServerCSS! I noticed your contributions to Debbie Lesko and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Marquardtika (talk) 19:26, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Try to create one page by me so please review the page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:ServerCSS/sandbox --ServerCSS (talk) 09:12, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be

Please note that machine translations of copyrighted material are considered copyright violations. —

talk · contribs] 21:29, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Please don't remove copyright violation templates. The templates are needed to inform

talk · contribs] 21:53, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Understand your concern , can't did again and creating this article with own words now-onward (Don't knowledge about copyright). Thanks --ServerCSS (talk) 22:06, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently edited a page related to

contentious

. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the

talk · contribs] 21:24, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Hello ServerCSS. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:ServerCSS. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=ServerCSS|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 08:08, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't taken any compensation amount from anyone and didn't edit for paid. --ServerCSS (talk) 19:00, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ServerCSS! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Kj cheetham (talk) 11:00, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your valuable guidance --ServerCSS (talk) 11:14, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to

1990 Bihar Legislative Assembly election

added a link pointing to Sitaram Yadav

Marhaura Assembly constituency

added a link pointing to Suraj Singh

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

updated to both , thanks for your suggestions. --ServerCSS (talk) 07:36, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ServerCSS, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. Our intro page provides helpful information for new users—please check it out! If you have any questions, you can get help from experienced editors at the Teahouse. Happy editing! Admantine123 (talk) 08:08, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 05:34, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Added four number of independent sources if you need will add. --ServerCSS (talk) 05:38, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Now you can review again, added multiple independent sources --ServerCSS (talk) 05:55, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by

article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. CycloneYoris ^talk! 07:01, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Both are different article [[1]] , comes under Sheikhpura district in Bihar and [[2]], comes under Nunger district in Bihar --ServerCSS (talk) 07:38, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[[3]] comes under Munger district in Bihar

so please review both article again. --ServerCSS (talk) 07:40, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your response! I will then remove the speedy deletion tag. CycloneYoris ^talk! 07:41, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of

Pawan Yadav

for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

Pawan Yadav is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted

.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pawan Yadav until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 08:26, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Janardan Manjhi

Here [4], why you removed the citation in name of cleanup and then tagged it for citation needed? Admantine123 (talk) 07:44, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. I have observed a number of pages created by you where you have named the subject ending with Yadav surname, but the sources donot say so. Avoid doing so, until you have any source, which specifically say that they have an alternative name, ending with Yadav. [5], this link will direct you to pages created by you. You may move page to original name supported by source. Admantine123 (talk) 08:00, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Kunti Yadav

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard

to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page,

speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Devi Kunti. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page

.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by

article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Admantine123 (talk) 08:09, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Deletion discussion about Dev Narayan Yadav College

Hello, ServerCSS, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username Sohom Datta, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Dev Narayan Yadav College, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dev Narayan Yadav College.

You might like to note that such

our guide

about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Sohom Datta}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Sohom (talk) 15:11, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about

Fatehpur Sanda College

Hello, ServerCSS, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username Sohom Datta, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created,

Fatehpur Sanda College, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fatehpur Sanda College

.

You might like to note that such

our guide

about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Sohom Datta}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Sohom (talk) 02:58, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about

S.D. College Kaler

Hello, ServerCSS, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username Sohom Datta, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created,

S.D. College Kaler, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/S.D. College Kaler

.

You might like to note that such

our guide

about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Sohom Datta}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Sohom (talk) 03:19, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Bharatha Chaitanya Yuvajana Party

Hello, ServerCSS, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username Sohom Datta, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Bharatha Chaitanya Yuvajana Party, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bharatha Chaitanya Yuvajana Party.

You might like to note that such

our guide

about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Sohom Datta}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Sohom (talk) 11:40, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ramachandra Yadav moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Ramachandra Yadav. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:00, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Ramachandra Yadav

has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Ramachandra Yadav. Thanks! DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:02, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Easter-egg links in articles on Indian politicians

Hi, Easter-egg links are those that are unclear about their destination (in this case to Politics of India. If you want to retain a link to that article, please list it in a section at the bottom entitled "See also", giving the real destination for readers.

Thanks for your contributions. Tony (talk) 05:23, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Daroga Prasad Rai College

Hello ServerCSS, I thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Daroga Prasad Rai College, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia, in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daroga Prasad Rai College.

You might like to note that such

our guide

about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Sohom Datta}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Sohom (talk) 09:25, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Battle of Rezang La moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to The Battle of Rezang La. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because there is insufficient content to demonstrate the importance of the subject. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Timothytyy (talk) 13:48, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Concern regarding Draft:Ramachandra Yadav

request

that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

talk) 17:05, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

Concern regarding Draft:The Battle of Rezang La

request

that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

talk) 14:05, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

May 2024

WP:SYNTH, and editorialization. I've addressed the worst of the COATRACK and SYNTH, but the remaining text still has neutrality issues. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 18:35, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply

]