User talk:Smalljim

How to use talk pages: (guidelines from Template:User talk top)

Talk page archives: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 · 10 · 11 · 12

Hi Smalljim, over on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:High_Sheriff_of_Devon#New_style_or_old_style_years_before_1752? I am seeking some advice on dating issues - in particular around the use of old style or new style dates before 1752. I would welcome your thoughts over there if you have time to comment.NHSavage (talk) 09:39, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've posted a brief apologetic reply there. Best wishes for 2021.  —SMALLJIM  11:19, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Mediocre Show, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Mediocre Show until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Smallerjim! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to

Over the last 11 or so years the number of missing parishes in Devon has been reduced significantly. You have also created some such as Merton, Devon as well as split some like Loxhore from the manor. There are only 4 left, see User:Crouch, Swale/Missing parishes (1)#Devon which you may be interested in. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:03, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the notice, but I'm pretty much retired from Wikipedia now. I do like the lists of surrounding parishes in the article leads though, by means of which one can take a virtual tour around the county. Expanding those would be another benefit, I think.  —SMALLJIM  23:16, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I tend to use the OS linked data, see Monkton, Devon and perhaps it could be added by a bot. Wikipedia:Templates with red links/104 from 2011 lists 92 missing of which only 1 (Isle of Man) is still red but that is "Lands common to Axminster and Kilmington". Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:05, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:12, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Presumably you didn't get as far as the last section... Johnbod (talk) 15:45, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I did, and what it says was not accurately reflected in the addition to the lead. Since you think something else is needed, I've rewritten it.  —SMALLJIM  21:19, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

22:53, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Thorverton, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Silverton.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Thanks for reverting spam links and apologies for messing up some of your fixes - I think I have restored all your edits correctly now and (after sorting out my incompetence) carried on reverting his edits all the way back. But if I have still made any errors do feel free to restore! Jonathan A Jones (talk) 16:51, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No problem - and especial thanks to you for completing the job that I did poorly by not looking beyond the 50 edits on his first user contributions page! I've just found and fixed two more on page 2, and using https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:LinkSearch has confirmed that there are no more from this domain.  —Smalljim  19:17, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year!

Smalljim,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 15:37, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 15:37, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I hope your new year is a good one too!  —Smalljim  16:35, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

how!!!!!? 50.109.155.222 (talk) 19:28, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

i remember it said you were deceaced, WTF??? 50.109.155.222 (talk) 19:29, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, The information is specifically personal knowledge. I’m aware of the machinations as I was one of the LD group who was bullied out leaving the authority in no overall control. I might be able to find newslinks and revise with hyperlinks when I have time after the election. OddJobLot (talk) 17:20, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@

conflicts of interest strongly discourages such people from editing affected articles. I hope this helps,  —Smalljim  13:34, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

In the article Feudal land tenure in England, a lot of its original text having been created in 2011 by a now-blocked user and subject since to numerous edits, I notice that an anonymous user has started reinstating deleted material. Do you think a block is being evaded? Belle Fast (talk) 10:21, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the alert. Obvious per

the duck test. I've contacted the blocking admin.  —Smalljim  13:12, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Many thanks for your prompt response and action! The user has been blocked (again) and the text deleted. Belle Fast (talk) 16:20, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And many thanks to you for spotting and raising it.  —Smalljim  22:42, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Hello. Wanted you to be aware of this request for more eyes on the disagreement taking place at Emmanuel Lemelson. I hope wider community input can help us resolve the issue. - Swiss Mister in NY (talk) 19:33, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, the introduction of inappropriate pages, such as

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 20:06, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Filmssssssssssss: I haven't had a warning like that for a while! I blocked User:Stuntrider99 and my block message was the first edit to their talk page, so it appears that has caused you to warn me in error.  —Smalljim  20:17, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, apologies for that Filmssssssssssss (talk) 20:20, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! The vandal is blocked and the talk page is blanked - that's all that really matters :)  —Smalljim  20:22, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think it might be a good idea to revoke talk page access here as well, given that the user is abusing it. JeffSpaceman (talk) 15:42, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - pipped to it by JBW.  —Smalljim  15:46, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Evening,

I've reinstated the block on Jerrykolt123 as despite your comment they went back to editing the article with no discussion. Blocked the other user as well as no valid exemption I could see to

Thanks, Amortias, for dealing with that for me. I really shouldn't take time off!  —Smalljim  21:59, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thanks for the recent blocks you've done of accounts with with doxxing in the username. However, please can you not create a talk page for those accounts when you block them? It just spreads the username around even more places for the OS team to suppress. Thanks! stwalkerster (talk) 21:13, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's remembering to change the defaults - but will do!  —Smalljim  21:30, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please block this IP. Warned three times, appears to be vandalism-only. Thank you.

Hi

2003LN6. I'll block if I see them make another bad edit, but sometimes the warnings work!  —Smalljim  20:13, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

@

ping you or refer to you to see what your username actually is. As you see, my first attempt above failed because I misread it. Hope this helps.  —Smalljim  20:21, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

@

6 20:23, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

Hi Jim, those Egyptian/North African IPs are proxies. You can safely hard block them for a nice long time so that the intended target can't cycle back through previous IPs. Best, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:33, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ta. Will do.  —Smalljim  19:34, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• today
• yesterday

Not sure what do hard to detect and block and they appear to have flexible resources to move around. -- GreenC 17:22, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@

combination of factors should make it possible to reliably spot the edits - and the more they make, the more evidence they provide :)  —Smalljim  21:48, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

Ok. Great. Do you want me to continue reporting IPs? -- GreenC 00:17, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, on the assumption that you'll keep reverting them I can get the data from your contributions, so no, there's no need, thanks. And hopefully there may be even less need in future :)  —Smalljim  09:37, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Jim. The user account User:WelshDragoon19 I assume, is a sock that is making mass reverts on the page Vivienne Martin (actress). Is it possible for you to block the account and protect the page? I added a report on RPP. Thanks. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 19:39, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I see that you have blocked the account for 31 hours. Given the sockpuppetry at play here, it might be a good idea to up the block to an indef. JeffSpaceman (talk) 19:49, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I quickly applied that block to stop the edit warring. I'll look into it.  —Smalljim  19:50, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ichthyotitan seems to be a target of constant vandalization. Can you consider putting temp protection on it? Perfecnot (talk) 22:23, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not at present. It's best if we keep the vandal's attention to just one article.  —Smalljim  22:27, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]