User talk:Starship 24
"PRussian invasion of Ukraine" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect PRussian invasion of Ukraine has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 29 § PRussian invasion of Ukraine until a consensus is reached. Mvqr (talk) 13:15, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
Trolling: warning
I have speedy deleted the above-mentioned redirect as pure trolling. If you create any more ridiculous redirects or otherwise deliberately waste other people's time you may be blocked. Several of your comments in the Redirects for discussion also illustrate your aim of wasting time, for example this and this. Bishonen | tålk 16:08, 29 March 2023 (UTC).
- I am not trolling, stop being rude. @Bishonen Frankly, accusing me of trolling is the only trolling here. I have no intent of wasting time. Stop right now. Starship 24 (talk) 20:56, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
- I'm sorry; I would have warned you more mildly if I'd been aware that you had been more or less "dared" to create the redirect in this section of the talkpage of Russian invasion of Ukraine. The experienced editors who did that have to share some of the blame. That said, I still have two points to make to you:
- 1. Please don't be so easily drawn another time.
- 2. Please don't WP:BLUDGEON, and that you will aim for giving your opinion once in future discussions; it's usually enough. Bishonen | tålk 09:14, 30 March 2023 (UTC).]
- Okay, that is fair. I wanted to respond to everyone's complaints, but I get why that is annoying @Bishonen Starship 24 (talk) 13:30, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
- I'm sorry; I would have warned you more mildly if I'd been aware that you had been more or less "dared" to create the redirect in this section of the talkpage of Russian invasion of Ukraine. The experienced editors who did that have to share some of the blame. That said, I still have two points to make to you:
March 2023
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Malware. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. —Bruce1eetalk 23:48, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
- I know, oops, didn't mean to put it here. @Bruce1ee Starship 24 (talk) 23:49, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
Notice on contentious topics area Balkans or Eastern Europe
You have recently made edits related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe. This is a standard message to inform you that the Balkans or Eastern Europe is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. Contentious topics are the successor to the former discretionary sanctions system, which you may be aware of. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see
- Do I need to stop editing there ? @Cinderella157 Starship 24 (talk) 13:29, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
- No, the advice is simply to make you aware that this area is a contentions topic - which includes the invasion of Ukraine. What does it mean to be a contentious topic? There is more likely to be contentious and disruptive editing in such an area. Consequently administrators have broader powers to deal with disruptive editing. It is just letting you know that you should be on your best behaviour. You are welcome to seek further advice. Cinderella157 (talk) 13:57, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
- Okay, then. Thank you. @Cinderella157 Starship 24 (talk) 14:51, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
- No, the advice is simply to make you aware that this area is a contentions topic - which includes the invasion of Ukraine. What does it mean to be a contentious topic? There is more likely to be contentious and disruptive editing in such an area. Consequently administrators have broader powers to deal with disruptive editing. It is just letting you know that you should be on your best behaviour. You are welcome to seek further advice. Cinderella157 (talk) 13:57, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
Xaner civilization moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to Xaner civilization. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. 𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙♂️Let's Talk ! 16:32, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Xaner civilization (1403 CE)
Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —Alalch E. 22:50, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Artemis program pages
Hi, regarding
- It been existing for qyite a while @Redrose64 Starship 24 (talk) 15:43, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
- Whilst Wikipedia:Artemis program was created four months ago (without any authority that I can find), Template:Wikipedia Artemis program was created today. Where were these discussed before creation? --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 18:32, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
- They weren't. The template was for the WikiProject, why does this need discussion. As to the WikiProject, I basically thought it was fine since the Constellation program was created with no approval. This was a revival of that with a bunch of differences. While I do realize this was wrong, it seems to be doing quite well and there is no real non-beuratic reason for deletion. It has 10 success (3 B class, 3 C Class, and 4 Start Class), multiple participants, and 4 months of existence. @Redrose64 Starship 24 (talk) 22:19, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
- Then Wikipedia:WikiProject Constellation program. A WikiProject with such narrow scope can only be doomed to failure; after all, we don't have any WikiProjects dedicated to Apollo, Gemini, Mercury or Space Shuttle - they are all covered by WikiProject Spaceflight]]. I strongly suggest that you read Wikipedia:WikiProject, Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Guide, Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Guide/WikiProject, Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 22:56, 4 April 2023 (UTC)]
- I dont think you understand the scope very well of either, do you. Look at the articles. The scope is spaceflight realted articles. @Redrose64 Starship 24 (talk) 23:24, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
- Also, as a project "doomed to fail" it has 10 success and 1 failure and has been going strong for 4 months. What evidence to you have to support this claim @Redrose64 The constellation program failed bnecause it was too amvitious and the creator got bored, which is different @Redrose64 Starship 24 (talk) 23:26, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
- One more thing, please dont do things to stuff you dont seem to understand. You moved the Wikipedia:WikiProject:Constellation program when the title actually had a purpose. You clearly have no grasp of the scope, purpose, or reasons. Please ask a member of those projects before doing things to it, since you dont appear to understand them yet. @Redrose64 Starship 24 (talk) 23:32, 4 April 2023 (UTC)]
- Regarding your comment
You moved the
Wikipedia:WikiProject:Constellation program when the title actually had a purpose. - I did no such thing. If you are going to make such claims, you must demonstrate with evidence that I made that page move. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 17:24, 5 April 2023 (UTC)]- You are write, that claim was incorrect. The rest is correct. Sorry, thats my at 11:32 P.M. @Redrose64 Starship 24 (talk) 17:28, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
- Regarding your comment
- Then
- They weren't. The template was for the WikiProject, why does this need discussion. As to the WikiProject, I basically thought it was fine since the Constellation program was created with no approval. This was a revival of that with a bunch of differences. While I do realize this was wrong, it seems to be doing quite well and there is no real non-beuratic reason for deletion. It has 10 success (3 B class, 3 C Class, and 4 Start Class), multiple participants, and 4 months of existence. @Redrose64 Starship 24 (talk) 22:19, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
- Whilst Wikipedia:Artemis program was created four months ago (without any authority that I can find), Template:Wikipedia Artemis program was created today. Where were these discussed before creation? --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 18:32, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
Warnings
Hi, if someone has had a {{
- They were already reported. @HJ Mitchell Starship 24 (talk) 18:19, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
- Then no further warnings are needed, just continue to revert them until someone pushes the block button.
- As an aside you can use {{re}} etc.) to automatically generate:
@[[User:Example|Example]]:
with the appropriate username as a parameter so the result appears as follows:{{re|Example}}
which generates @Example - Multiple users may be pinged by including their usernames as additional parameters hence
{{re|User1|User2|User3}}
. Some other templates can also be used for the same purpose such as {{U}} is also frequently used for pings on discussion pages, but most of the other userspace linking templatesserve a more narrow purpose. - However be mindful that unregistered cannot be pinged (see WP:PINGIP) instead use {{talkback}} or {{whisperback}} instead. 74.73.224.126 (talk) 01:42, 6 April 2023 (UTC)]
RFPP
Hello Starship 24. I have noticed your edits to RFPP and I would like to thank you for taking an interest in that area. However, I wanted to give you some tips over you recent requests for protection/unprotection.
In this, you requested semi-protection of a page that had no edits for over 6 months. Pages only need protection in the event of persistent, recent disruption. This article did not qualify. Then there is also this request for unprotection. The page in question does not need to be edited by IP addresses (the only edits to that page come from a bot) so there is no need to unprotect that page. Doing so could actually harm the article by exposing it to IP vandals.
I appreciate the interest you are taking in this website, but you may want to read up on our
- Okay. Thank you @47.227.95.73 Starship 24 (talk) 22:35, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
- Also, just letting you know that pings do not work for IP addresses. :) Cheers, 47.227.95.73 (talk) 22:36, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
- Oh, thats odd. Why is that? Starship 24 (talk) 22:37, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
- I am not quite sure. It may have something to do with the fact that IP's can be shared, as in; operated by multiple people. 47.227.95.73 (talk) 22:39, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
- Okay, then, thank you Starship 24 (talk) 22:46, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
- I am not quite sure. It may have something to do with the fact that IP's can be shared, as in; operated by multiple people. 47.227.95.73 (talk) 22:39, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
- Oh, thats odd. Why is that? Starship 24 (talk) 22:37, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
- Also, just letting you know that pings do not work for IP addresses. :) Cheers, 47.227.95.73 (talk) 22:36, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
- Starship 24, I will ask you to stop commenting on other editors' requests for page protection. Some of your comments verge on inappropriate, such as this one. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 14:35, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
- Okay then @Isabelle Belato Starship 24 (talk) 15:03, 9 April 2023 (UTC).
- You have also been making a lot of RFPP requests, many of which don't seem to have enough vandalism to meet protection requirements. 47.227.95.73 (talk) 00:18, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to
- Rocket Lab
- added links pointing to Integration and LC1
- High Earth orbit
- added a link pointing to Transmission
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
Testing
Good day there, Please don't mind me reverting your edit on User talk:Sandbox for user warnings, it's just a test of the Redwarn feature. Regards! DreamRimmer (talk) 04:06, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Stack exchange
Hi - the discussion at RSN has been closed, so I've come here to answer the question you asked me there. In short, it's not reliable because it is user-generated. This is discussed at
Stack exchange itself has been discussed many times in the past, and there is a strong consensus that it should not be used as a source - you can find links to those discussions at
MfD nomination of Wikipedia:Artemis program
- You may not remove a MFD Notice. You have now done it twice Banks Irk (talk) 14:27, 10 April 2023 (UTC)]
- I wasnt trying to remove the notice you messed up the entire pages (displayed everything twice) just trying to fix it @Banks Irk Starship 24 (talk) 14:28, 10 April 2023 (UTC)]
- I have fixed with everything working. Sorry about that, didn't mean to remove the notice @Banks Irk Starship 24 (talk) 14:32, 10 April 2023 (UTC)]
- I wasnt trying to remove the notice you messed up the entire pages (displayed everything twice) just trying to fix it @
Speedy deletion declined: Draft:Luan Muça
Hello Starship 24, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of
- Then how do I get it deleted? @Primefac Starship 24 (talk) 19:53, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
- You don't need to get it deleted. It's a draft - it's not doing any harm where it is. If the author abandons it, it will end up getting deleted automatically in six months. If they continue trying to force it into article space, it will end up at WP:AfD, where it will either be deleted, or folk will identify some sources that could be used to support it and it will be kept. Girth Summit (blether) 00:22, 11 April 2023 (UTC)]
- You don't need to get it deleted. It's a draft - it's not doing any harm where it is. If the author abandons it, it will end up getting deleted automatically in six months. If they continue trying to force it into article space, it will end up at
Some tips
Hi - so, some more tips on sourcing. Per
Please don't clerk noticeboards
Hi Starship 24, I had attempted to point this out indirectly before ([1]). Looking at [2], [3] and [4] that happened afterwards, I'm afraid I need to directly ask you to stop doing this. Please don't comment on others' noticeboard reports as you currently lack the experience required for doing so, and please don't judge whether this has changed yourself. If you would like to resume commenting on others' noticeboard reports, let me know.
This is not a strict ban, as I can't issue one in the classical sense described by the banning policy, but you may end up being partially blocked from noticeboards or even all pages if this request is disruptively ignored.
Best regards,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:42, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
- How/why was I wrong @ToBeFree Could you please help gain that knowledge/experience Starship 24 (talk) 01:12, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
- A (to the last bit): Step back, watch and learn. More importantly, listen. I think this is a case of your enthusiasm exceeding your capabilities (experience). Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak and remove all doubt. I am not saying that you are a fool but this talk page is evidence that you have done some things that are less than wise and consequently, you have probably pissed a few people off. Perhaps you might refrain from randomly dropping your 2¢ worth in at pages that are primarily the domain of administrators. Cinderella157 (talk) 02:59, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
- PS: While we shouldn't bite the newbies, there is a corollary: if you don't want to get your head bitten off, don't stick your neck out. ;) Cinderella157 (talk) 03:11, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
SPI April 2023
You are suspected of
August 2023 Good Article Nominations backlog drive
Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive | |
August 2023 Backlog Drive:
| |
Other ways to participate: | |
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. |
March 2024 GAN backlog drive
Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive | |
March 2024 Backlog Drive:
| |
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. |