This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.
Hello, Tbhotch!
helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! fetchcomms
Latin music project, if you're interested. Any music in Spanish or Portuguese goes and submissions starting from May are accepted. Erick (talk) 20:10, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply
]
I love it. We're missing hundreds of Latin American songs and our existing articles are badly shaped. Unfortunately starting the next month I won't be able to edit as consistently as I'm currently editing. I can continue collaborating with article creations and ratings others' articles but not in the intended competitive way of the edithon.
Understood. If you'd like you can volunteer to be the judge of the competition since we technically don't have one at the moment. All you'd have to do is update the points from the submissions. On an unrelated note, have you seen List of best-selling Latin albums? I worked on it last year with other editors and thought you might want to know that it exists. Thanks again as always Tbhotch! Erick (talk) 15:05, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Response
The page
MOS:ACCESS is a Wikimedia policy. Tbhotch, I came to you with recommendations that would be beneficial. Please don't be antagonistic towards me for no reason. Please assume good faith of my coming here. Thank you. Ss112 17:11, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply
On 28 July 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Museo Cabeza de Juárez, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the head on top of the Museo Cabeza de Juárez(pictured) inspired the pictogram of Guelatao metro station? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Museo Cabeza de Juárez. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Museo Cabeza de Juárez), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
On 28 July 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Guelatao metro station, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the head on top of the Museo Cabeza de Juárez(pictured) inspired the pictogram of Guelatao metro station? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Museo Cabeza de Juárez. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Guelatao metro station), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
⚠ Thanks for uploading File:3T - YoungstaCPT.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
On 2 August 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Colonia Federal, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the neighborhood of Colonia Federal was built by employees of the Mexican Secretariat of the Interior to create exclusive housing for civil servants? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Colonia Federal. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Colonia Federal), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
On 4 August 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Coyote en Ayuno, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the first ray of sunlight on 23 April passes through the eye of the Coyote en Ayuno(pictured), which was built to commemorate the founding of Nezahualcóyotl, Mexico? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Coyote en Ayuno. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Coyote en Ayuno), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
On 10 August 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Fuente de la República, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the idea for the Fuente de la República arose after Manuel Felguérez suggested a fountain to accompany his newly inaugurated Puerta 1808 to the mayor of Mexico City? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Fuente de la República. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Fuente de la República), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Hi, then how are we going to prove what has been posted on her article? TheBellaTwins1445 (talk) 02:16, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
But there are none, most of the ones you will find on the web would say she was born on Guaymas, Sonora, when she was not, and they also have her birthplace wrong, she was born on 16 September not 12, so how are we supposed to prove it? TheBellaTwins1445 (talk) 02:18, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Gracias por las contribuciones para los artículos de transporte de la CDMX. Estan quedando muy completos! 👍🏽 Abbastraea (talk) 23:54, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
RfC: A TikToker, ... , other accused constitute 'Public figure' or not?
Some of other related policies for current requested RfC discussion:
WP:NOTPUBLICFIGURE
.
Requesting inputs about WP policies regarding,
WP:BLP
protocols and naming of the accused in relation to mentions of allegations and counter allegations in the given article, against a female victim of sexual assault, her associates and also other accused.
Hi again! So, I have a strange request. The article about me has been promoted to Good article status. After appearing on the Main Page's DYK section, another editor translated and nominated the entry for similar status at Spanish Wikipedia. I don't speak Spanish but the translation seems solid and the article looks almost identical to the English Wikipedia version. Curious if you have a moment to make sure the text looks good to you, before the nomination gets picked up for review. No worries if you're not interested. Happy editing! ---Another Believer(Talk) 19:28, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Very interesting. Thanks for the feedback and for making improvements to the entry! Curious to see how the nomination goes. Take care for now! ---Another Believer(Talk) 21:15, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
?
err...do you know the official release is the date on us..? the article say the way, but says the release date of album-
and u will keep being based on the wrong data base? because the apple music are wrong too. (says it was released on jan 1st, 2013)
@Fakesmiletoo: And this is why I said "the world does not revolve around the United States". For some weird reason, Americans are the only users that frequently come to Wikipedia to "fix" release dates that are not incorrect. Yes, Ariana said that, yes, there are sources with that date. But her record label released it on a different date in a different country. What's difficult to understand about that? And of course, the iTunes link doesn't say that. This is an archived copy that clearly reads:
£8.99
Genres: Pop, Music, R&B/Soul, Dance, Contemporary R&B, Vocal, Rock
Released: 30 August 2013
℗ 2013 Universal Republic Records, a division of UMG Recordings, Inc.
Now, if you dislike the album being released on a different date than the one you know about, blame it on her record label. We only go by the earliest known, not the one where the artist comes from.
⚠ Thanks for uploading File:...And Stuff - Psychostick.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Antena 3.ro.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
On 8 October 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Antimonumento +43, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the anti-monument to the 43 students kidnapped in 2014(pictured) was also dedicated to the thousands of people reported missing in Mexico? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Antimonumento +43. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Antimonumento +43), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
WP:LGBT/PERSON would be kind enough to take a look and let me know how it could be improved. Or, if it looks ok, to move it to the mainspace. Thank you in advance for your help and consideration. 22:27, 11 October 2022 (UTC) Volcom95 (talk) 22:27, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply
Happy First Edit Day! Hi Tbhotch! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 19:59, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Looks like there were a couple copy-paste errors in his name, but please double check my 'corrections' are actually corrections. — kwami (talk) 21:57, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Mark Zuckerberg
The page is protected, I cannot edit. On line 18 there is an error: after "Forbes" there is an apostrophe. Can you fix it? 151.36.35.204 (talk) 01:04, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The moving IP changing the nationality on this article takes no notice of other users, as you have probably noticed in the edit history, despite the fact that there is a debate in the first page of the talk page archives that came to the conclusion that "British" would be best. Even worse is their insistence that Natalie Imbruglia is English, despite the fact that she was born in Australia and only has a British passport, so it's OR to state that she is English as there is no way of proving this. But apart from page protection I'm not sure what can be done, and the IP is moving onto other pages to change nationalities as well. Richard3120 (talk) 03:04, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, nice spot, thanks. I did wonder whether a range block would be a possibility. I'm not fanatical about having the "correct" UK nationality, but it does seem to me that if there is a previous consensus or a long-standing existing nationality, it shouldn't just be changed without agreement. And the Natalie Imbruglia one is just flat out wrong. Richard3120 (talk) 03:19, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the
2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
⚠ Thanks for uploading File:IPN Seal.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 04:22, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply
Tbhotch, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
—Moops⋠T⋡ 20:36, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Please engage in discussion before deleting others’ comments to your talk page. I’m open, always, to being reminded of exceptions to policy and understanding how you think they apply in this situation. Deleting my comment is inappropriate. ZsinjTalk 16:23, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
In fact, it is not @
WP:OWNTALK
. I highly suggest you to not take things personal and behave as an admin if you are going to ask for such position rather than taking sides.
The other editor was not blocked when you made a fourth revert.
WP:3RRNO #3 is not applicable. Sorry if the warning template is abrasive. See how I engaged in discussion? My only request was to discuss in lieu of deleting my outreach. ZsinjTalk 16:30, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply
]
So it wasn’t obvious to me until further reviewing the history of Tulisa that the added/reverted edits were the same as those related to Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/MariaJaydHicky. Your edit summary removing my warning did not reference the LTA, leaving me in the dark. Admins are not expected to be omnipotent, so I thank you for your patience while I understood broader context. I semi-protected the page after HJ beat me to blocking the IP. Happy editing. ZsinjTalk 16:47, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The user is banned. It doesn't matter if the active IP/user is blocked or not, or if it is under an SPI investigation, or if it is under an admin review, the user is evading a block and a ban and WP:3RRNO applies by itself. 3RRNO does not "activate" solely because an admin determines one of the parties is indeed a banned editor, and the banned editor doesn't get a get-out-of-the-jail card to do whatever they want solely because they have not been verified as sockpuppets or they can change their IP by simply turning off their modem or changing their physical location. That's called WP:gaming the system and Maria perfectly knows that she is gaming the system and that's why she engages in such behavior.[4]
And I can explain to you in simple terms (it was simpler in my mind but I extended a little more) why I (and others) "edit-war" with this banned editor (and others who behave in the same way), because in our experience following the protocol rarely works immediately unless the admin notices it already knows Maria (or the banned editors). Banned editors wake up to edit "in good faith". They can do it for hours, days, or even months and act like normal editors, but at the moment they are caught, they go reckless because they know they have been caught and they will be blocked soon, so edit-warring starts as that's the last thing that they can do, but they want us to go down with them, because they know we have a 3RR policy, and if an unsuspecting admin believes that both parties are edit-warring for the seek of edit-warring, they will perform admin actions on both editors. Here, for example, you didn't block me, but you warned me and protected the page with no reason attached to the summary, because you were trying to figure out what was going on. Not being omnipresent, omniscient, and omnipotent is not a reason not to investigate further. Here I said the B-word, and the amount of content removed was exactly the same as the previous revert. The editor answering with wikilanguage further indicates that the user is not a newbie as well. Repeating ourselves with "Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/MariaJaydHicky" (or whatever summary that indicates who the other party is) ad nauseum gives the impression that established editors must justify every single edit they perform while (apparently) new editors are free to do as they please solely because they don't "know" how we work. Experienced editors know who are truly new and those who don't. Or for example, you telling me that "Deleting [your] comment is inappropriate", which is not in itself, especially if there is nothing to discuss or justify. For this case, the page's history was crystal clear, and if you go further you can see the same issue as far as 2010/12 when Maria was just a blocked editor evading blocks; the page's protection log even going deeper on this.
Imagine the scenario if I had acted as the protocol indicates. Maria performs the edit, what's the next step? Is the editor adding incorrect content? No. The edit is disruptive? No. The edit is vandalism? No. The user can be reported to AIV? Not by itself and I have had AIV reports of Maria (and several banned editors) declined because a: the user has not been warned correctly (or at all), b: AIV is not SPI (even with evidence), c: the edits are not vandalism or d: I should look for dispute resolution (with a banned editor, for some reason). Meanwhile, Maria has already moved to pages 2, 3, 4 and 5. The banned editor is still editing. She knows that she might be detected soon or maybe she will not. She knows that most of her edits are reverted but she also knows that she hasn't been caught in several of her edits. I stopped editing around 2014 and when I returned in 2020 I had to go back as far as 2017 to revert several of her undetected changes.
Protocol option 2, SPI: For privacy reasons, Checkuser cannot confirm or deny that the person is operating the IP. Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MariaJaydHicky already has an open SPI with 4 other IPs already listed (opened 4 days ago, by the way). Why should I wait until a Checkuser decides to go to that SPI and wait for them to confirm something I already know but then decline the investigation with a "Yes, the IPs behavior is similar, but for legal reasons I cannot affirm or deny the user is the user, however, I blocked the IP to prevent further disruption" (IPs that are already assigned to another person at that point).
Protocol 3 and 4: RFPP and AN/ANI: RFPP is random sometimes the page is protected (indef for some reason despite it is not truly justified), sometimes it is not (Indigo (Chris Brown album) was not protected because there is was no justification at that point, despite being a common target for sockpuppetry as indicated by the history). The admin forum is random as well, sometimes admins proceed, sometimes the comment gets lost between other comments, and sometimes you are directed to the venues above.
What I'm trying to explain, and I'd like you to understand, is that non-admins have to excessively rely on admins who are unaware of the situation and sometimes these will unduly take a side with the new editor because #AssumeGoodFaith™ or because they don't want to review the case and engage on any admin action simply because they don't want to get in trouble if the situation was the opposite of what they thought it was. It's frustrating and tiresome, at least for me, because I have to review 5,000 pages per week. Simply saying the name of the banned editor doesn't solve the issue because she is known for accussing others of sockpuppetry as well,[5][6][7][8] so that's why it is important to see the whole picture and not to stick to what the protocol says.
Spit (album) has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Chchcheckit (talk) 16:35, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi!
Hello, I hope you read my message, but how do you know that the article Deseo Inherente could be a hoax? I don't think a random person posted it because if you see the image it says "Sony Music Latin. All rights reserved". Saúl Rodrigo Martínez (talk) 01:05, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, Tbhotch! I was wondering if you might be able to create an article at English Wikipedia (even just a stub!) for es:Cruz de Mañozca? I'd prefer a Spanish speaker take a first stab at a translation. Thanks in advance for any help. ---Another Believer(Talk) 19:26, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks again for your help above! On the off chance you're interested in doing another quick translation, I'd love to see an entry for es:Escultura con rostro de la muerte at English Wikipedia, too. Either way, happy editing! ---Another Believer(Talk) 19:28, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your many wonderful contributions to Wikipedia. I'm especially appreciative of your entries about anti-monuments in Mexico, public art, transportation, and other historic sites. You've answered many questions for me and responded to requests for translation, which is very helpful. Keep up the great work and happy editing! --Another Believer(Talk) 18:37, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
August 2023 Good Article Nominations backlog drive
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. LizRead!Talk! 17:11, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. LizRead!Talk! 01:05, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned non-free image File:Crystal 103.7.svg
⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Crystal 103.7.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
"Sony" is not a label, it is the parent music company of the labels. Sony Music Distribution is not a label either. Sony Discos (now Sony Latin) and Epic are labels. Thedeadpet (talk) 19:46, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Here (source: press archive from Argentinian media outlet TN), here and here you can see the original cassettes released for the first time in Colombia and Latin America with the Columbia Records imprint on them. The first two images are from the first release in Colombia, the third one is from Chile.
Here, you can see that Rolling Stone magazine states that the next album was also released via Columbia. Thedeadpet (talk) 17:52, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
First of all, like Discogs, captured photos may be user submitted, should not be used for reference. Rolling Stone is an American magazine, while Shakira was signed to Sony Colombia in 90s. 2402:1980:320:A03B:0:0:0:1 (talk) 05:30, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 14:49, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Publishing A Wikipedia Article!
Hello, TBhotch! I have made a page on my sandbox which is about my friend whom is a author and I would love if you could help it become an offical page? It is everything it needs to be published but I have no rights so if you would be so kind and wonderful if you could help! Cheers!
Please do not create talk pages for disambiguation pages with no content other than the Wikiproject banner. See the documentation at {{WikiProject Disambiguation}}. Thanks. PamD 06:40, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
What isn't clear? The template documentation says, in bold in a box, "Please do not use this template solely to create talk pages that otherwise have no content". PamD 17:58, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I considered going to ANI after that inappropriate response, but will assume that you're just having a bad day. Please remember to be civil to other editors. PamD 07:54, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Reminder to remember to manually finish cleaning up after page swaps. I was hoping you might consider running for admin, so you could do such moves the right way, but then I saw the discussion above. Sigh. wbm1058 (talk) 02:50, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be
deleted for any of several reasons
.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. LizRead!Talk! 02:10, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 04:22, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
The redirect El ganador se lleva todo has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 19 § El ganador se lleva todo until a consensus is reached. ArcticSeeress (talk) 10:36, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
