User talk:Th78blue

Greetings,

Please leave me any comments, criticisms, barnstars, kittens, cookies, or other paraphernalia at the bottom of this page—below the hearts and line as indicated below. If I do not respond promptly, it is because I am away from my computer for any number of reasons, and I will respond to your query as soon as I can. Please be patient, thank you. ♥

I am kind of obsessed with the en dash (–). I find the following key to be a useful guide regarding proper use of the various dashes, hyphens, and minus signs. Each object aesthetically appears to look similar, but serves a different function:

• The hyphen (-), is used to join multiple words that function together as a single concept, also referred to as a compound word.

• The en dash (–) or "N dash", is named after the fact that it is approximately as wide as the capitalized letter "N", and is used to represent the words “to” or “through” when specifying a range.

• The em dash (—) or "M dash", is named after the fact that it is approximately as wide as the capitalized letter "M, is the longest and most versatile dash. It is used to act as a more emphatic comma, semicolon, or colon.

• The minus sign (−) or "negative sign", is the symbol used to show a negative value. This is not the same—though very close in appearance to—the en dash (–). Seen side-by-side: en dash first followed by the minus sign (– −), the minus sign is slightly higher than the en dash.

Source: https://www.wix.com/wordsmatter/blog/2020/07/hyphen-vs-dashes/

To indicate a range of numbers, such as inclusive values, dates, or pages, use the en dash (–) Example: 2015–2017

Instead use a minus sign in instances such as the following example Example: 12 − 3 = 9

Use a minus sign to indicate negative numbers. Example: −79

Use an en dash (–) instead of a hyphen in a compound modifier when:

One element of the modifier is an open compound. Examples Windows 10–compatible products dialog box–type options

Two or more of the elements are made up of hyphenated compounds (a rare occurrence).

Don’t use an en dash to indicate an empty cell in a table.

Don’t use spaces on either side of an en dash.

Exception Surround an en dash with spaces when it's used as a minus sign in an equation or in a time stamp appearing in UI. Examples 12 – 3 = 9 2:15 PM 12/1/16 ‒ 4:45 PM 4/1/16.

In text, don’t use an en dash in a range of times. Use to instead: 10:00 AM to 2:00 PM. In a schedule or listing, use an en dash with no spaces around it: 10:00 AM–2:00 PM.

Exception In a date range that includes two times and two dates, add spaces around the en dash. Examples 2:15 AM‒4:45 PM 4/1/16 (time range on a single day) 2:15 PM 12/1/17 ‒ 4:45 PM 4/1/18 (range includes both time and date)

Source: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/style-guide/punctuation/dashes-hyphens/enes

I regularly delete content on this page below this line. It just makes it easier for me to navigate, find, and respond to stuff. Anything above this section here, I have decided to keep for a longer time frame. ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  GeneralNotability (talk) 01:20, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Th78blue (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

To Whom It May Concern, let the record show that I do not have multiple accounts. I would not even begin to have the time for one thing. I generally make dozens to hundreds of edits per day, nearly 95–99% of which are on basic and tedious changes including fixing hyphens, en dashes, and em dashes where one has been mistakenly misused in place of another, and working "Notable people" lists on various towns and cities. I also work on fixing date formatting where birth and death date formats are often poorly laid out on lesser known biographical articles and the like. Occasionally, I may wander over to more sensitive subjects as a matter of personal interest, but I do try to always at least remain civil, and do my best to help other editors that I think are doing solid work and that demonstrate they are here "...helping to build the encyclopedia." I also enjoy being a part of the TypoTeam, correcting for basic typos, I would not have the time to even start or manage another account! While I have noted some other editors work—you come to learn of other editors work after making nearly 40,000 edits after all—including the alleged sock/meat puppet Pulpfiction621, and I have sent them WikiLove such as cookies, strawberries and the like, as well as many other editors I am sure, any "puppetry" ends there. Lastly, as a user in good standing, I have never abused my permissions including Rollback, New page reviewer, or Pending changes reviewer, and I fully hope to continue to demonstrate my "un-sockness" to the community at large. Please unblock me, you will not regret it. ♥Th78blue (talk)♥ 16:49, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

My findings concur with those of User:GeneralNotability, I'm afraid. Drmies (talk) 02:37, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Th78blue (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

As has been previously documented, I have an eye condition called retinitis pigmentosa, and so I organize things on my page for ease of viewing since it is my talk page after all. As for any other editor/s, I cannot speak for them. Regarding the "overwhelming overlap", I did some digging myself to see what kind of overlap in question might exist, and I find that between Pulpfiction162 and myself, there was around ~400 edits of overlap I believe. Wow, that sure seems like a lot I suppose, but factor in that I have made 39,464 edits to date and you are looking at less than ~1%. Is that a lot? I really do not know at that point, but seems like not a lot to me. Certainly not "overwhelming"? In addition, I also add dozens if not hundreds of images to wikimedia. This is a project that has helped me to manage stress and given me purpose in life. I like updating breakfast cereal images and adding new ones where not present, and I even spend my own money on new cereals that I may only take images of for a single bowl specifically for this purpose, probably pretty wasteful, but some have such high sugar content that I cannot risk it either for the blood sugar adverse surges. I have three boxes of new cereals lined up at present and are ready to go with the images and the edit updates immediately pending an unblock. I only edit for myself and have read the full guide to appealing blocks, I think when taken on the whole, my edits are unquestionably a net positive for this fine project, and singularly unconnected to any other account. I believe these and other reasons to be sufficient, and to be good reasons, for a deeper look and a final appeal to please unblock me so I can get back to my favorite past time after a long and stressful day. Sometimes this encyclopedia induces some stress of its own! As many of you more experienced editors may agree, but as you will likely also agree, it has always been worth it to me, and I value your time invested in reading my appeal application and in considering what I have contributed and fully plan to continue to contribute if ultimately unblocked. Thank you very much. ♥Th78blue (talk)♥ 04:09, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 22:35, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@

talk) 01:37, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Sarrail, I hope you understand what I meant when I wrote what I wrote. There is only one way out, and that's by acknowledging that we found what we found. I don't understand this stuff about cereal boxes, it's a waste of my time, and if Th78blue wants to accomplish anything I think they know what they should do. Thank you, Drmies (talk) 01:41, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry about the time-wasting, I hope you get it back. Cheers,

talk) 01:44, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Is it automatically guessed that the user with more edits is the sock master (if in fact, this is a sock at all seems doubtful)? Are those the only factors involved? More edits, must be the sock master, fewer edits, the puppet? Also, would you mind explaining what you mean by this? "and if Th78blue wants to accomplish anything I think they know what they should do". Please and thank you. Riverbend21 (talk) 09:58, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sometimes no. There are some users that have been blocked, only to go unnoticed. See

talk) 18:15, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

I was wondering about the evidence in this case as well. Between the two editors, they've made about 50,000 edits...I don't see how they would have time to sock. I trust our Checkusers but often sockmasters are given a definite time block, not indefinite while the sockpuppets are indefinitely blocked. Does that depend on whether or not they are truthful? Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:20, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That also goes along with me. Different pronouns, this account with nearly 40,000 edits...IMO, uncertainty lingers. I've known Th78blue for quite a time while reverting vandalism. I just don't understand how they were blocked. However, per Drmies' comment, we just need to leave it the way it is unless someone changes their mind.

talk) 12:19, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Since others are weighing in here, I might as well add my piece. I have no clue what degree the technical evidence was conclusive, so I can't reasonably speak at that. Logistically, if these two accounts are the same person, that would be somewhat difficult to pull off. I found there was at least one day (28 March 2022) where both were editing at the exact same time doing two different activities ([1][2]). That certainly does not rule out meatpuppetry (nor does it entirely rule out sockpuppetry either), but I'm not seeing the purpose if it was that. –

☖ 21:56, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

• If a decision to unblock is being considered, it may also be prudent to note this at User talk:Pulpfiction621 (if they are indeed separate people), else PF is probably just sitting there thinking the issue has been totally forgotten. jp×g 15:03, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  @Pulpfiction621alerted. Riverbend21 (talk) 11:13, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Zach Weissmueller and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 14#Zach Weissmueller until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 17:15, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

]

October 2022 New Pages Patrol backlog drive

New Page Patrol | October 2022 backlog drive
On 1 October, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled and for maintaining a streak throughout the drive. Barnstars will also be awarded for re-reviewing articles. Redirect patrolling is not part of the drive. Sign up here!
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

(t · c) buidhe 21:17, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Th78blue. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:15, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

A tag has been placed on Jeremy Kauffman, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See
  Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations
  for more information.
• It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See
  section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable
  .

Much has happened since the last newsletter over two months ago. The open letter finished with 444 signatures. The letter was sent to several dozen people at the WMF, and we have heard that it is being discussed but there has been no official reply. A related article appears in the current issue of The Signpost. If you haven't seen it, you should, including the readers' comment section.

Awards: Barnstars were given for the past several years (thanks to MPGuy2824), and we are now all caught up. The 2021 cup went to John B123 for leading with 26,525 article reviews during 2021. To encourage moderate activity, a new "Iron" level barnstar is awarded annually for reviewing 360 articles ("one-a-day"), and 100 reviews earns the "Standard" NPP barnstar. About 90 reviewers received barnstars for each of the years 2018 to 2021 (including the new awards that were given retroactively). All awards issued for every year are listed on the Awards page. Check out the new Hall of Fame also.

Software news: Novem Linguae and MPGuy2824 have connected with WMF developers who can review and approve patches, so they have been able to fix some bugs, and make other improvements to the Page Curation software. You can see everything that has been fixed recently here. The reviewer report has also been improved.

Suggestions:

• There is much enthusiasm over the low backlog, but remember that the "quality and depth of patrolling are more important than speed".
• Reminder: an article should not be tagged for any kind of deletion for a minimum of 15 minutes after creation and it is often appropriate to wait an hour or more. (from the NPP tutorial)
• Reviewers should focus their effort where it can do the most good, reviewing articles. Other clean-up tasks that don't require advanced permissions can be left to other editors that routinely improve articles in these ways (creating Talk Pages, specifying projects and ratings, adding categories, etc.) Let's rely on others when it makes the most sense. On the other hand, if you enjoy doing these tasks while reviewing and it keeps you engaged with NPP (or are guiding a newcomer), then by all means continue.
• This user script puts a link to the feed in your top toolbar.

Backlog:

Saving the best for last: From a July low of 8,500, the backlog climbed back to 11,000 in August and then reversed in September dropping to below 6,000 and continued falling with the October backlog drive to under 1,000, a level not seen in over four years. Keep in mind that there are 2,000 new articles every week, so the number of reviews is far higher than the backlog reduction. To keep the backlog under a thousand, we have to keep reviewing at about half the recent rate!

Hello Th78blue,

Backlog

The October drive reduced the backlog from 9,700 to an amazing 0! Congratulations to WaddlesJP13 who led with 2084 points. See this page for further details. The queue is steadily rising again and is approaching 2,000. It would be great if <2,000 were the “new normal”. Please continue to help out even if it's only for a few or even one patrol a day.

2022 Awards

Onel5969 won the 2022 cup for 28,302 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 80/day. There was one Gold Award (5000+ reviews), 11 Silver (2000+), 28 Iron (360+) and 39 more for the 100+ barnstar. Rosguill led again for the 4th year by clearing 49,294 redirects. For the full details see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone!

Minimum deletion time: The previous

WP:BLAR). Due to complaints, a consensus decided to raise the time to 1 hour. To illustrate this, very new pages in the feed

are now highlighted in red. (As always, this is not applicable to attack pages, copyvios, vandalism, etc.)

New draftify script: In response to feedback from AFC, the The Move to Draft script now provides a choice of set messages that also link the creator to a new, friendly explanation page. The script also warns reviewers if the creator is probably still developing the article. The former script is no longer maintained. Please edit your edit your common.js or vector.js file from User:Evad37/MoveToDraft.js to User:MPGuy2824/MoveToDraft.js

Redirects: Some of our redirect reviewers have reduced their activity and the backlog is up to 9,000+ (two months deep). If you are interested in this distinctly different task and need any help, see

WP:RFD

.

Discussions with the WMF The

revamping the landing pages

that new users see.

Reminders

• Newsletter feedback - please take this
  short poll
  about the newsletter.
• There is live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
• Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
• If you no longer wish to be a reviewer, please ask any admin to remove you from the group. If you want the tools back again, just ask at PERM.
• To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

Hello, Th78blue. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 14:33, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Th78blue! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Goldback is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Goldback until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Warrenᚋᚐᚊᚔ 22:10, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]